HAL Id: jpa-00215207
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/jpa-00215207
Submitted on 1 Jan 1973
HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.
L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.
SOME THEORETICAL PROBLEMS RELATED WITH NON RESONANT ENHANCEMENTS
G. Cohen-Tannoudji
To cite this version:
G. Cohen-Tannoudji. SOME THEORETICAL PROBLEMS RELATED WITH NON RESO- NANT ENHANCEMENTS. Journal de Physique Colloques, 1973, 34 (C1), pp.C1-235-C1-238.
�10.1051/jphyscol:1973127�. �jpa-00215207�
SOME THEORETICAL PROBLEMS RELATED
WITH
NON RESONANT ENHANCEMENTSSOME THEORETICAL PROBLEMS RELATED WITH NON RESONANT ENHANCEMENTS
G. COHEN-TANNOUDJI
OPh .T
;CEN SACLAY
1 .- INTRODUCTION.- Knowing w h a t i s n o t a r e s o n a n c e - i s o b v i o u s l y n e c e s s a r y t o know w h a t i s a r e s o n a r l c p . The w h o l e h a d r o n i c s p e c t r o s c o p y i s t h u s a f f e c t e d by t h e p o s s i b i l i t y o f e x i s t e n c e o f non r e s o n m t m h a n c e - m e n t s . As a c o n s e q u e n c e t h e w h o l e m d e r s t a n d i n g o f h a d r o d y n a m i c s i s a l s o a f f e c t e d b y t h i s p o s s i b i l i t y . F o r i n s t m c e , t h e c l a s s i f i c a t i o n o f s t a t e s a c c o r d i n g t o symmetry s c h m e s r e l i e s on t h e d e c i s i o n o f g i v i n g s u c h o r s u c h s t a t e t h e d i g n i t y o f b e i n g a r e s m a n - c e . T h i s i s o b v i o u s l y t r u e f o r SU[3) b u t a l s o f o r i n s t a n c e f o r c h i r a l symmetry: i n t h i s r e s p e c t t h e p o s s i b i l i t y t h a t A1 i s n o t a r e s o n a n c e p u t s a l o t o f t r o u b l e s f o r t h e t e n a n t s o f s u c h a symmetry s c h e m e . T h e s e p a r a t i o n o f r e s o n a n c e s f r o m p s e u d o r e s o n a n c e s i s a l s o c r u c i a l f o r t e s t i n q some d y n a m i c a l s c h e m e s l i k e , s a y , d u a l i t y . As we s h a l l s e e a t t h e e n d o f t h i s t a l k o n e d o e s n o t know y e t w e t h e r t h e t w o compo- n m t d u a l i t y c o n j e c t u r e d by H a r a r i a n d F r e m d i n t w o body s c a t t e r i n g i s v a l i d o r n o t i n d i f f r a c t i v e p r o d u c - t i o n s .
I t i s r a t h e r d i f f i c u l t t o d e c i d e i n a v e r y c l e a r way w h a t i s a r e s o n a n c e . T h e f r e n c h summer s c h o o l o f GIF s u r YVETTE d e v o t e d a c o m p l e t e s e s s i o n i n 1971 t o t h i s q u e s t i o n . One o f t h e p r o p o s e d a n s w e r s w a s t h a t a r e s o n a n c e i s a s i q a l a p p e a r i n g i n a g i v e n s t a t e i n d e p e n d e n t l y o f t h e o r o d u c t i o n mechanism.
Ac o n t r a - r i o a non r e s o n a n t e n h a n c e m e n t d e p e n d s o f t h e p r o d u c - t i o n a m p l i t u d e . S o , s t u d y i n g t h e s e p s e u d o r e s o n a n c e s i s n o t o n l y i m p o r t a n t f o r h a d r o n s p e c t r o s c o o y b u t a l s o f o r t h e m d e r s t a n d i n g o f t h e p r o d u c t i o n p r o c e s s i t s e l f . I n t h i s r e s o e c t t h e e x p l a n a t i o n o f t h e s o c a l l e d ABC e f f e c t , p r o p o s e d i n t h i s c o n f e r e n c e i s p a r t i c u l a r l y i n t e r e s t i n g .
2.- THE DECK MECHANISM.- We s h a l l f i r s t r e c a l l b r i e - f l y how t h e s o c a l l e d Deck mechanism w o r k s in p r o d u - c i n g p s e u d o r e s o n m c e s . C o n s i d e r t h e p r o d u c t i o n am- p l i t u d e a
+b
+c
+d
+e s y m b o l y s e d i n f i g . 1 on w h i c h t h e k i n e m a t i c s i s d e f i n e d .
t a c
F i g . 1
O r i g i n a l l y t h e Oeck e f f e c t i s a k i n e m a t i c a l e n h a n c e - m m t p r o d u c e d b y t h e p r e s e n c e o f a p o l e i n t h e t
a c v a r i a b l e , c l o s e t o t h e p h y s i c a l r e g i o n . Even i f t h e r e i s n o r a p i d v a r i a t i m i n t h e scd v a r i a b l e , t h e p r e - s e n c e o f n e a r b y p o l e i n tac f a v o r s t h e low c d i n v a r i - a n t m a s s e s , a s shown i n f i g . 2.
-- ccumulat ion
low scd events
physical.
region
F i g . 2
One m d e r s t i n d s e a s i l y t h a t t h e Oeck e f f e c t d i s a g - p e a r s . r a p i d l y w i t h i n c r e a s i n g i n i t i a l e n e r g y s . I n f a c t when s i n c r e a s e s t h e p h y s i c a l domain b r o a d e n s a n d f l a t t e n s n e a r t
=0 i n s u c h
8way t h a t t h e low
a c
m a s s e n h a n c e m e n t v a n i s h e s . C u r i o u s l y i t is t h e d e v e - l o p m e n t o f Regg.e f o r m a l i s m i n i n c l u s i v e p r o c e s s e s w h i c h h a s a l l o w e d t o u n d e r s t a n d why t h e Deck mecha- n i s m may p e r s i s t w i t h i n c r e a s i n g m e r g y . Assume t h a t p a r t i c l e s c m d
da r e a p a r t o f t h e m i s s i n g m a s s in
Article published online by EDP Sciences and available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/jphyscol:1973127
t h e i n c l u s i v e p r o c e s s a
+b
+e . + x. I n t h e f r a g m e n - t a t i o n r e g i o n [ s l a r g e , tbe s m a l l ) t* Regge b e h a v i o u r i s g i v e n by
w h e r e a i s t h e t r a j e c t o r y e x c h a n g e d between b m d e . The h i g h e r i s t h i s t r a j e c t o r y , t h e s t r o n a e r i s t h e c u t o f f i n s
c d '
T h i s e x p l a i n s why Deck e n h a n c e m e n t s a r e l i k e l y t o o c c u r when
:- p i o n c a n b e e x c h a ? q e d between a a n d c ( n e a r b y p o l e 1
- Pomeron can b e e x c h a n g e d b e t w e e n b
ande (scd -2 c u t o f f 1 .
3 . -
THE Q CROSS OVER PUZZLE.- T h e d i f f r a c t i v e l y p r o d u c e d Q e n h a n c e m e n t i s c o n s i d e r e d a s o n e o f t h e b e s t i l l u s t r a t i o n o f t h e Deck mechanism. The Deck d i a g r a m shown i n f i e . 3 a l l o w s t o e x o l a i n m o s t of t h e o b s e r v e d f e a t u r e s
:K
---~---VK*I
x
N
- t h e s h a p e o f t h e 61 e n h a n c e m w t
- t h e e n e r g y d e p e n d e n c e o f i t s p r o d u c t i o n c r o s s s e c t i o n
- t h e d e n s i t y m a t r i x o f K*.
L h f o r t m a t e l y t h i s mechanism d o e s n o t e x p l a i n t h e o b s e r v e d c r o s s o v e r o f
Qa n d 5 d i f f e r e n t i a l c r o s s s e c t i o n s
:d u e t o a i o n e x c h a n g e o n e e x p e c t s a .rr-Nucleon t y p e c r o s s o v e r w h e r e a s o n e o b s e r v e s
aK-Nucleon l i k e o n e . The s i t u a t i o n i s even w o r s e i n n e u t r a l Q0 m d
Go p r o d u c t i o n s w h e r e t h e o b s e r v e d e f f e c t i s t h e i n - v e r s e o f t h e o n e e x p e c t e d f r o m n a i v e p i o n e x c h m g e .
( s e e f i g .
4 ) .I n a p a p e r s u b m i t t e d t o t h i s c o n f e r e n c e
( 1 )G. Cohen Tannoudj
i,C. G i l a i n a n d A. S a n t o r o p r o p o s e a s o l u - t i o n b a s e d on d u a l i t y a r g u m e n t s t o t h i s p u z z l e . It i s known t h a t t h e c r o s s o v e r e f f e c t i n K-Nucleon s c a t - t e r i n g i s d u e t o t h e i n t e r f e r e n c e b e t w e e n t h e Pomeron a n d t h e o c o n t r i b u t i o n s . T h e c r o s s o v e r e f f e c t i n n-Nucleon s c a t t e r i n g i s much w e a k e r b e c a u s e t h e w i s n o t c o u p l e d t o
nlr.I n o r d e r t o h a v e a K-Nucleon l i k e c r o s s o v e r i n Q p r o d u c t i o n o n e t h u s n e e d s t h e e x c h a n g e o f t h e w . T h e a b o v e m e n t i o n e d a u t h o r s show t h a t t h i s
we x c h a n g e i s p o s s i b l e p r o v i d e d t h a t t h e p i o n i s n o t e x c h a n g e d a l o n e b u t i n company w i t h i t s e x c h a n g e d e k e n e r a t e p a r t n e r ( w h i c h c o u l d b e t h e
Bmeson I . F i g .
5shows t h e d u a l i t y d i a g r a m s c o n t r i b u t i n g t o w e x c h a n q e i n
K*Tp r o d u o t i o n
F i g . 5
I n d e e d t h i s e x p l a n a t i o n o f t h e Q c r o s s o v e r p u z z l e a p p l i e s o n l y t o t h e
K*Wp r o d u c t i o n .
When t h e O bump i s o b s e r v e d i n t h e K
ps y s t e m , t h e r e i s n o o u z z l e s i n c e it i s t h e K w h i c h i s e x c h a n - g e d . Rut t h e O i s m a i n l y o b s e r v e d i n t h e K% s y s t e m .
4 . -
DUALITY I N DIFFRACTIVE PRODUCTIONS.- As we h a v e s e e n a b o v e t h e Deck e f f e c t i s l i k e l y t o o c c u r i n d i f - f r a c t i v e o r o d u c t i o n s . I n an i n c l u v e p o i n t o f v i e w a d i f f r a c t i v e p r o c e s s i s o f t h e t y p e a
+ b +b
+x. I n t e r m s o f t h e R e g g e - M u e l l e r a n a l y s i s t h e i n c l u s i v e d i f f r a c t i v e c r o s s s e c t i o n i s , i n t h e f r a g m e n t a t i o n r e g i o n r e l a t e d t o t h e t o t a l c r o s s s e c t i o n o f t h e s c a t t e r i n g o f a v i r t u a l Pomeron on p a r t i c l e a
:see f i g . 6 .
F o r l a r g e m i s s i n g m a s s e s o n e e x p e c t s t h i s v i r t u a l
r e a c t i o n t o b e d o m i n a t e d b y Pomeron a n d s e c l n d a r y
Regge e x c h a n g e s . F o r low m i s s i n g m a s s e s o n e e x p e c t s
t h e o c c u r e n c e o f d i f f r a c t i v e r e s o n a n c e s a n d d i f f r a c -
SOME
THEORETICAL PROBLEMS RELATED
WInl NON RESONANT ENJUNCEIYIENTS C1-237F i g . 6
t i v e b a c k g r o m d . It i s o f g r e a t t h e o r e t i c a l i n t e r e s t t o know whether t h e two component conj o n c t u r e o f H a r a r i and F r e m d a c c o r d i n g t o which r e s o n a n c e s a r e d u a l t o Regge p o l e s and background t o Pomeron i s a l s o v a l i d i n d i f f r a c t i v e r e a c t i o n s . In p a r t i c u l a r . i f one was a b l e t o s e p a r a t e d i f f r a c t i v e r e s o n m c e s from d i f - f r a c t i v e b a c k r o m d , one s h o u l d be a b l e t o g e t t h r o u g h F i n i t e Mass Sum R u l e s
(t h e i n c l u s i v e v e r s i o n of F i n i t e Energy Sum R u l e s ) m i d e a o f t h e r e l a t i v e s t r e n g t h of Pomeron -Pomeron -Reme and Pomerm -Pornarm- Pomerm c o u p l i n g s . U l f o r t m a t e l y , a s we have s e e n , t h e Deck mechanism i s a b l e t o t e r r i b l y c o m p l i c a t e t h e s i t u a t i o n i n p r o d u c i n g non r e s o n a n c e b u t r e s o n a n c e l i k e e n h m c e m e n t s . In o t h e r words t h e d i f f r a c t i v e b a c k g r o m d s h a r e s w i t h d i f f r a c t i v e r e s o n a n c e s many o f t h e i r f e a t u r e s . Due t o t h e i m p o r t a n c e of y e s t i o n ' s r e l a t e d w i t h t r i p l e Pomeron c o u p l i n g , we t h i n k it would be i n t e r e s t i n g t o improve d e t a i l & a n a l y s e s o f t h e d i f f r a c t i v e l y produced m i s s i n g m a s s - ( p h a s e s h i f t m a l y s i s , d e n s i t y m a t r i x , p h a s e v a r i a t i o n . . . ) i n o r d e r t o w e l l s e p a r a t e r e s o n a n c e s from b a c k g r o m d . L e t u s c o n c l u d e t h i s s e c t i o n by m e n t i o n i n g t h e p a p e r submit- t e d by L u b a t t i m d Moriyasu ( 2 1 which c o u l d a l l o w s y s t e m a t i c s t u d i e s o f t h e i m p l i c a t i o n s o f d u a l i t y m d q u a r k model i n d i f f r a c t i v e d i s s o c i a t i o n s .
5.-
THE ABC EFFECT AND ITS EXPLANATION.- We c o n c l u d e t h i s b r i e f s u r v e y o f t h e o r e t i c a l i n t e r p r e t a t i a n s of
n mr e s o n m t e n h m c e m e n t s by m e n t i o n i n g t h e e l e g m t e x p l a n a t i o n o f t h e s o c a l l e d ABC e f f e c t propoded i n a s u b m i t t e d p a p e r by J. h j o s ,D. Levy m d A. S m t o r o [ S ) .
The ABC e f f e c t i s a n e a r t h r e s h o l d e n h m c e m m t o b s e r v e d i n t h e m i s s i n g mass s p e c t r u m i n t h e r e a c t i m d
+p
+He3
+ mno.T h i s e f f e c t was f i r s t o b s e r v e d a l o n g t i m e ago and d i d n o t r e c e i v e m y s a t i s f a c t o r y e x p l m a t i o n .
Aseries o f e x p e r i m e n t s
(41, u s i n g t h e e x t r a c t e d d e u t e r o n beam from t h e s y n c h r o t r o n S a t u m e a t S a c l a y h a s been r e c w t l y performed by a S a c l a y , Cam m d F r a s c a t i c o l l a b o r a t i o n . L. G o l d z a h l h a s r e p o r t e d h e r e t h e main f e a t u r e s o f t h e e x p e r i m e n t a l d a t a . I n f i g . 7 we show t h e a p p r o x i m a t e s h a p e o f t h e o b s e r v e d spectrum p l o t t e d v e r s u s t h e l a b o r a t o r y mo- mentum o f t h e o u t g o i n g He3. The t h r e e bumps a r e
c a l l e d from l e f t t o r i g h t ( i n c r e a s i n g He3 momentum1
"forward ARC", "middle bump", "backward ABC".
P Lab (lie31
F i g . 7
The proposed t h e o r e t i c a l e x p l a n a t i o n r e l i e s on t h e t r e a t m e n t of t h e r e a c t i o n a s a r e a l t h r e e body p r o - blem
:two p i m s a r e produced i n a two s t e p r e a c t i o n N1
+p
-+d
+nl f o l l o w e d by di
+ N2 +n,
+ ti3where
i e'
N m d N a r e t h e c m s t i t u a n t s o f t h e d e u t e r m and
1
2d an i n t e r m e d i a t e d e u t e r m . The k i n e m a t i c a l c m f i g u -
ir a t i o n i s s u c h t h a t t h e i n t e r m e d i a t e d e u t e r o n i s a l - most on i t s mass s h e l l , s o t h e diagram of f i g .
8i s
dominant .
F i g . 8
The two p r o c e s s e s I and 11, w i t h r e a l d e u t e r m
have been e x p e r i m e n t a l l y s t u d i e d . The d i f f e r e n t i a l
c r o s s s e c t i o n s show s t r o n g f o r w a r d m d backward p e a k s .
Q u a l i t a t i v e l y m e c m m d e r s t e n d t h a t when b o t h
r e a c t i o n s t a k e p l a c e i n t h e f o r w a r d d i r e c t i o n m e
g e t s t h e f o r w a r d ABC, when t h e y t a k e p l a c e i n t h e
backward d i r e c t i o n m e g e t s t h e backward ARC, m d
when m e t a k e s p l a c e i n t h e f o r w a r d d i r e c t i o n and
t h e o t h e r i n t h e backward d i r e c t i o n m e g e t s t h e
m i d d l e bump; Nore q u m t i t a t i v e c a l c u l a t i o n s t a k i n g
i n t o a c c o m t t h e Fermi motion i n s i d e t h e d e u t e r m
l e a d t o a s a t i s f e c t o r y , a g r e e m e n t w i t h t h e d a t a .
REFERENCES
I1 1 COHEN-TANNOUDJI ( G I
.
G I L A I N I C I and SANTORO [ A l , I 3 1 ANJOS [J.Cl. LEVY I D 1 and SANTORD (A), PaperPapar No 407. No 114.
I 2 1 LUBATTI I H . J l md WORIYASU I K I . Paper No 377. I 4 1 BANAIGS [ J 1
et
A1. ,
P a o e r No 11 8.BANAIGS