GROWTH SEQUENCE OF Si-CLUSTERS : FROM A FEW ATOMS TO THE AMORPHOUS PHASE

HAL Id: jpa-00220909

https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/jpa-00220909

Submitted on 1 Jan 1981

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

GROWTH SEQUENCE OF Si-CLUSTERS : FROM A FEW ATOMS TO THE AMORPHOUS PHASE

R. Mosseri, J. Gaspard

To cite this version:

R. Mosseri, J. Gaspard. GROWTH SEQUENCE OF Si-CLUSTERS : FROM A FEW ATOMS TO THE AMORPHOUS PHASE. Journal de Physique Colloques, 1981, 42 (C4), pp.C4-245-C4-248.

�10.1051/jphyscol:1981452�. �jpa-00220909�

CoZZoque

C4,

suppl6ment au nO1O, Tome 42, octobre 1981 page

C4-245

GROWTH SEQUENCE OF S i - C L U S T E R S

:

FROM A FEW ATOMS TO THE AMORPHOUS PHASE

B. Mosseri and J . P . Gaspard X

Laboratoire de Physique des SoZides,

CNRS, 2,

place

A.

Briand, 92190 Meudon- Be ZZevue, France

t

I n s t i t u t de Physique, UniversitQ de Li2ge, B-4000 S a r t MZman, BeZgim

A b s t r a c t We s t u d y t h e growth sequence of c l u s t e r s of atoms bonded by s and p e l e c t r o n i c i n t e r a c t i o n s . I t i s demonstrated t h a t , l i k e i n t h e c a s e of c e n t r a l f o r c e s , t h e c l u s t e r s b e a r l i t t l e r e l a t i o n t o t h e s t r u c t u r e s formed a s s u b u n i t s of t r i o r t e t r a v a l e n t c r y s t a l l i n e l a t t i c e s . The s t a b i l i t y of t h e c l u s t e r i n c r e a s e s with t h e number of bonds even i f t h e bond formation i s accompanied by bond a n g l e s s u b s t a n t i a l l y d i f f e r e n t from 109 o r 1200. But,in c o n t r a s t with t h e c a s e of c e n t r a l f o r c e s , bond a n g l e s Si-Si-Si s m a l l e r t h a n about 90° produce an i n c r e a s e i n bond l e n g t h accompanied by a weakening of t h e c l u s t e r cohesion.

We f i n d t h a t i n some c a s e t h e system undergoes a Jahn-Teller d i s t o r t i o n when t h e HOMO (Highest Occupied Molecular O r b i t a l ) i s degenerate.

I. I n t r o d u c t i o n . - I t i s important t o s t u d y t h e growth sequence of small c l u s t e r s of c o v a l e n t atoms not only because i t s i m u l a t e s t h e d e p o s i t i o n of atoms when forming t h e amorphous phase, but because i t g i v e s i n f o r m a t i o n on t h e r e l a t i v e importance of t h e r a d i a l and a n g u l a r p a r t s of t h e i n t e r a t o m i c p o t e n t i a l s , i n d e - pendently of t h e e f f e c t of t h e neighbouring atoms occuring i n t h e bulk. I t i s shown i n t h i s paper t h a t t h e most s t a b l e c l u s t e r geometries correspond t o a maximization of t h e number of bonds, a t l e a s t f o r bond a n g l e s g r e a t e r t h a n 90°.

We f i n d t h a t , l i k e i n t h e c a s e of c e n t r a l forces[l] ( r a r e g a s e s . . . ) , t h e growth sequence of Si atoms b e a r l i t t l e r e l a t i o n t o t h e s t r u c t u r e s formed a s s u b u n i t s on any ( t e t r a v a l e n t ) c r y s t a l l i n e l a t t i c e . I n t h e c a s e of c e n t r a l f o r c e s , t h e r u l e i s j u s t t o maximize t h e number of bonds w h i l s t i n t h e c a s e of c o v a l e n t systems, a r e d u c t i o n of t h e bond a n g l e below 90° c o s t s energy and may p r e v e n t t h e formation of s h o r t r i n g s ( t r i a n g 1 e s ) . The f i v e - f o l d ( p 1 a n a r ) r i n g s with bond a n g l e s of 1 0 S O ( c l o s e t o 109°28')

,

a r e favoured and g i v e r i s e t o a l o c a l f i v e f o l d synnnetry.

Article published online by EDP Sciences and available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/jphyscol:1981452

JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE

I. Models and methods

I n o r d e r t o c a l c u l a t e t h e f o r m a t i o n e n e r m of t h e c l u s t e r s . we

- -

have t o assume a model o f t h e e l e c t r o n i c ( a t t r a c t i v e ) i n t e r a c t i o n and a p a i r w i s e c e n t r a l r e p u l s i v e p o t e n t i a l V(r) which p r e v e n t s t h e system from c o l l a p s e . We c o n s i d e r o n l y s and p v a l e n c e e l e c t r o n s i n t h e t i g h t b i n d i n g framework[2]

,

^[3]

.

The energy l e v e l s Es and E a r e s e p a r a t e d by 7.3 eV. The o v e r l a p of atomic wavefunctions i s n e g l e c t e d 'and t h e t i g h t b i n d i n g i n t e r a c t i o n p a r a m e t e r s a r e , a s g i v e n by Lannoo e t a l . 141 a t a d i s t a n c e of 2.35 fl :

s s r = - 1 . 9 3 eV, s p a = 2.23 eV, p p a r 3.22 eV and p p n r-0.83 eV w i t h a uniform e x p o n e n t i a l b e h a v i o u r w i t h d i s t a n c e : exp(-qr) w i t h q s l . 106 A-

.

The r e p u l s i v e p a i r p o t e n t i a l i s g i v e n by:

V(r)= Vo exp(-pr) w i t h p = 2.094

A-' .

^Vo i s determined i n o r d e r t o g e t a n i n t e r a t o m i c d i s t a n c e f o r t h e S i 2 m o l e c u l e e q u a l t o 2

.

Let u s s t r e s s t h a t we do n o t assume a p r i o r i a p a r t i c u l a r t y p e of s - p h y b r i d i n t h e m o l e c u l a r bond: t h e d i r e c t i o n n a l i t y o f t h e bond i s t h e con- sequence of t h e e l a c t r o n i c i n t e r a c t i o n . The t o t a l energy of t h e system i s g i v e n by

I ^ETe,

⁼

+;zE: ^{+ i; V,,l(rid)}

^{- L}

^N

^{( E . c E p )}

1

where E . a r e t h e energy l e v e l s of t h e h a m i l t o n i a n and N t h e number of atoms. The l a s t t e h n i s t h e s u b s t r a c t i o n of t h e atomic sZp2 energy.

I n t h e c a s e of small c l u s t e r s , one o r two g e o m e t r i c p a r a m e t e r s a r e v a r i e d c o n t i n u o u s l y i n o r d e r t o g e t t h e e q u i l i b r i u m geometry. No c h a r g e t r a n s f e r i s t a k e n i n t o account a t t h i s s t a g e of t h e c a l c u l a t i o n : i t c o u l d modify t h e c o n c l u s i o n s i n c e t h e atoms a r e no l o n g e r n e u t r a l .

111. R e s u l t s on small S i m o l e c u l e s 1)

g3

Let u s f i r s t o b s e r v e t h a t a

s i m p l e p a i r i n t e r a c t i o n approximation -12 would i n any c a s e s t a b i l i z e t h e e q u i -

l a t e r a l t r i a n g l e : t h e l a r g e r t h e num-

b e r of bonds, t h e more s t a b l e t h e _-14 c o n f i g u r a t i o n . The c a l c u l a t i o n t h a t

we d i d u s i n g t h e method d e s c r i b e d i n I1 t a k e s i n t o account t h e quantum me-

c h a n i c a l c h a r a c t e r of t h e c o v a l e n t bond. -16 Fig 1. shows t h e v a r i a t i o n of

t h e t o t a l energy a s a f u n c t i o n of t h e

m:

^{Si3 The}

bond a n g l e i n t h e r a n g e from 600(equi- shows t h e energy ver- l a t e r a l t r i a n g l e ) t o 180°( l i n e a r s u s bond a n g l e c l e f t s c a l e ) . The c h a i n ) . The most s t a b l e s i t u a t i o n lower c u r v e shows t h e e q u i l i b r i u m corresponds t o an angle of about 1000 distance f o r each a % l e ( r i g h t s c a l e ) . w i t h a- r a t h e r f l a t minimum( e s p e c i a l -

l y when l a r g e r v a l u e s of p p r a r e a s - sumed). This means t h a t a n g u l a r d i s - t o r t i o n i s n o t s o much e x p e n s i v e i n energy p r o v i d e d t h e a n g l e being n o t l e s s t h a n about 80°. I n c r e a s i n g t h e ppx v a l u e ( i . e i n c r e a s i n g t h e s t r e n g t h of the7'tbond) c o n t r i b u t e s t o t h e s t a -

b i l i z a t i o n o f t h e l i n e a r c h a i n . _-16 2) S i ,

-q. The most s t a b l e s i t u a t i o n i s Fig.2: S i 4 molecule. T o t a l energy n o t t h e t e t r a h e d r o n a s i t would b e i n versus bond angle.

-

2 3 4 5 6

w :

M o l e c u l a r O r b i t a l Energy L e v e l s f o r t h e p l a n a r S i 5 c l u s t e r

Fig.3:

Comparison between i s o m e r s t a b i l i t y versus bond angles. ~ h ~ d o t t e d

f o r N = 3 t o 6. l i n e d e s c r i b e s t h e Lower Unoccu-

p i e d M o l e c u l a r Level.

t h e c a s e o f a c e n t r a l p a i r p o t e n t i a l ( c . f Hoare) b e c a u s e t h e a n g u l a r d e f o r m a t i o n i s p r o h i b i t i v e . Fig.2. shows t h e e n e r g y v a r i a t i o n f o r t h e p l a n a r a r r a y o f f o u r atoms. The ( p e r f e c t ) s q u a r e i s not t h e most s t a b l e c o n f i g u r a t i o n s i n c e t h e HOMO i s d e g e n e r a t e : t h e system u n d e r g o e s a J a h n - T e l l e r d i s t o r t i o n , t h r e e e d g e s a r e s h o r t e n e d d u e t o t h e i n c r e a s e of t h e bond a n g l e s whereas t h e f o u r t h edge i s s u b s t a n c i a l l y i n c r e a s e d . L e t u s remark t h a t t h e e n e r g y c u r v e d e c r e a s e s l i n e a r l y a t e = 900 a s i t i s e x p e c t e d i n t h e J a h n - T e l l e r i n s t a b i l i t y . S t a b i l i z i n g t h e l i n e a r S i 4 m o l e c u l e r e q u i r e s a more d r a m a t i c i n c r e a s e of p p n t h a n i n t h e c a s e o f S i 3

.

3 ) g 5

The c o h e s i v e e n e r g y o f a l a r g e r number o f p l a u s i b l e i s o m e r s have t o b e compared. Fig.3 shows t h e i s o m e r s c o n s i d e r e d i n t h i s c a l c u l a t i o n s e t a c c o r d i n g t o t h e i r c o h e s i v e energy. The most s t a b l e i s o m e r ( among t h o s e c o n s i d e r e d ) i s t h e p e n t a g o n ( s l i g h t l y ) d i s t o r t e d a g a i n by a Jahn-Tellei- e f f e c t . The a n g u l a r d i s t o r t i o n i s 4 O

(f)=

112O). The s q u a r e pyramid i s l e s s s t a b l e ; l e t u s n o t i c e

t h a t t h e i n t r o d u c t i o n of a n atom above t h e s q u a r e d i l a t e s t h e s q u a r e , j u s t t h e o p p o s i t e way a c e n t r a l p o t e n t i a l would do.

The m o l e c u l a r o r b i t a l energy l e v e l s a r e p l o t t e d a g a i n s t t h e bond a n g l e on Fig.4

.

4 ) S f 6

We h a v e compared t h e c o h e s i v e e n e r g y o f t h e l i n e a r c h a i n , t h e s q u a r e bipyramid and t h e s i x - f o l d r i n g ( F i g . 3 ) . The s i x - f o l d r i n g h a s been c o n t i n u o u s l y d i s t o r t e d o r " c o r r u g a t e d " s t a r t i n g from t h e p l a n a r c o n f i g u r a t i o n toward " c h a i r "

c o n f i g u r a t i o n s o f v a r i a b l e bond a n g l e . The minimum o c c u r s f o r a n a n g l e o f * O l e 5 ) s3t

C l u s t e r s of 8 S i atoms a r e i n s t r u c t i v e . We have compared h e r e f o u r c l u s t e r s o f d i f f e r e n t d i - m e n s i o n a l i t y : -ID, t h e l i n e a r c h a i n ( bond a n g l e

..

-

s t a b i l i t y

e q u a l s t o 180°) -2D, a p a i r of f i v e - f o l d r i n g s w i t h a common edge t a k e n from a dodecahedron(2D c u r v e d s u r f a c e ) w i t h a l l a n g l e s e q u a l t o 108O.

-3D, a c u b e and a s o - c a l l e d "small b a r r e l a n " . We o b s e r v e t h a t t h e most s t a b l e c l u s t e r s a r e n o t p r e -

s e n t i n t h e c r y s t a l l i n e diamond s t r u c t u r e . An e i g h t Fig.5: Comparison between atoms p i e c e o f diamond i s n o t e n e r g e t i c a l l y compe- isomers s t a b i l i t y f o r 8 t i t i v e , b e c a u s e o f t h e l o w e r a v e r a g e c o o r d i n a t i o n atoms cluster.

JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE

number. However t h e small b a r r e l a n a p p e a r s i n t h e w u r t z i t e s t r u c t u r e . I n f a c t , t h e a v e r a g e c o o r d i n a t i o n number i s n o t t h e o n l y p a r a m e t e r governing t h e s t a b i - l i t y a s i t i s shown on Fig.5

.

The l i n e a r c h a i n ( 7 bonds) i s l e s s s t a b l e t h a n t h e c u b e ( l 2 bonds), b u t t h e most s t a b l e c l u s t e r s a r e t h e small b a r r e l a n ( 9 bonds) and t h e p a i r of 5-fold r i n g s w i t h a common edge( 9 bonds).

I V . L a r g e r S i c l u s t e r s

We c a l c u l a t e t h e c o h e s i v e energy of t h r e e l a r g e r c l u s t e r s u s i n g t h e same method t h a n f o r t h e s m a l l e r ones. We c o n s i d e r a 29 atoms s u b u n i t of t h e diamond l a t t i c e c o n t a i n i n g a l l t h e 6 - f o l d r i n g s p a s s i n g throw a c e n t r a l v e r - t e x , a dodecahedron and a 21 atoms c l u s t e r which c o n s i s t s i n t h e packing of 4 small b a r r e l a n s around a c e n t r a l v e r t e x , t h e l a t t e r two being drawn on Fig.6

.

The t o t a l energy of t h e c l u s t e r s h a s been c a l c u l a t e d a t each s t e p of t h e i r c o n s t r u c t i o n , s t a r t i n g from a few atoms t o t h e f u l l c l u s t e r . The r e s u l t s f o r t h e dodecahedron and t h e b a r r e l a n c l u s t e r s a r e shown on Fig.7 where t h e e l e c - t r o n i c ( a t t r a c t i v e ) p a r t of t h e energy h a s been p l o t t e d a g a i n s t t h e number of atoms. I t h a s t o b e n o t e d t h a t t h e energy c u r v e i s v e r y s i m i l a r t o t h e p l o t of a rough count of t h e a v e r a g e number of d a n g l i n g bonds p e r atom which shows t h e c r u - c i a l r o l e of bond f o r m a t i o n when b u i l d i n g t h e c l u s t e r . Moreover, t h i s i s suppor- t e d by t h e g a i n i n energy c l e a r l y v i s i b l e a t each r i n g c l o s u r e .

The 21 atoms b a r r e l a n c l u s t e r h a s i t s own i n t e r e s t i n t h e l i g h t of r e c e n t r e s u l t s on m i c r o c r y s t a l l i n e S i . Indeed i t can b e shown t h a t i t i s an i n - t e r m e d i a t e s t a g e of r e c o n s t r u c t i o n when g o i n g from a Connell-Ternkin l i k e model t o a w u r t z i t e l a t t i c e .

The dodecahedron i s t h e most s t a b l e c o n f i g u r a t i o n ( among t h e t h r e e c o n s i d e r e d h e r e ) . However s t r a i n i s supposed t o i n c r e a s e when adding new dodeca- d r a s h a r i n g f a c e s w i t h t h e f i r s t one. lw,, I b Q t .

l

Fig. 7 : Energy v e r s u s number of atoms. The lower c u r v e s show t h e a t t r a c t i v e p a r t of t h e t o t a l energy ( l e f t s c a l e ) . The upper c u r v e s show t h e number o f d a n g l i n g bonds p e r atom ( r i g h t s c a l e ) . a ) dodecahedron b ) b a r e l a n c f u s t e r . V. Conclusions.

-

The main c o n c l u s i o n s can be s m e r i z e d a s follow:

I n s and p bonded S i c l u s t e r s : i ) c r y s t a l l i n e arrangements a r e n o t favoured( l i k e i n r a r e g a s e s c l u s t e r s ) . i i ) a n approximate r u l e i s t o maximize t h e number of bonds p r o v i d e d t h a t t h e bond a n g l e s a r e g r e a t e r t h a n about 90°. i i i ) t h e r e i s an open c o m p e t i t i o n between isomers.

I t h a s t o be n o t e d t h a t h y d r o g e n a t i o n of t h e c l u s t e r s could change t h e c o n c l u s i o n s s i n c e Si-H bond i s s t r o n g e r t h a n S i - S i bond.

-

111 Hoare,M.R. and PAL,P., Adv. Phys.

20

(1971) 161

[2] Harrison,W.A. " E l e c t r o n i c s t r u c t u r e and t h e p r o p e r t i e s of S o l i d s "

( Freeman,San F r a n c i s c o , 1980).

[3] F r i e d e 1 , J . J. d e P h y s i q u e

2

(1978) 651 [4] Lannoo ,M.and Allan,G. p r i v a t e communication.

s e e a l s o Lannoo,M. J . d e Physique %(1979)461

a

Fig.6:

L a r g e r c l u s t e r s . a ) The dodecahedron(20 atoms) b ) The "4 small b a r r e l a n s "

c l u s t e r ( 2 1 atoms)