• Aucun résultat trouvé

• List of Tables

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "• List of Tables "

Copied!
4
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Contents:

• Acknowledgements

• Contents

• List of Tables

• List of Figures

1. Structure of the thesis

1.1. Motivation and Objectives of the thesis 1.2. Outline of the thesis

2. Absorptive capacity and Knowledge Flows for Large International Firms: A Survey

2.1. Introduction

2.2. Framework to formalize the R&D Spillovers: A Review of the Literature

2.2.1. Technological and geographical proximities 2.2.2. Production function Approach

2.2.3. Knowledge production function Approach

2.3. Absorptive capacity: Definition and Measurement issues 2.4. Effects of Knowledge Spillovers: Econometric Modelling

and Empirical Evidence

3. Data and Empirical structure

(2)

4. Microevidence of the Effects of R&D on Labour Productivity for Large International R&D Firms

4.1. Introduction

4.2. Empirical findings

4.2.1. Variable and constant returns to scale specification 4.2.2. Robustness of the results

5. Geographic and Technological R&D Spillovers within the Triad: Microevidence from US Patents

5.1. Introduction

5.2. Estimation results

6. Technological and Geographical proximity effects on Knowledge Spillovers: Evidence from US Patent citations data

6.1. Introduction 6.2. Empirical results

6.2.1. Basic results

6.2.2. Analysis of proximity effects over time

7. Conclusions

7.1. State of the art, contributions to the literature and motivations

7.2. Main findings

7.3. Policy implications

7.4. Weaknesses of the research done and suggestions for the

further research

(3)

References

Appendix 1 :

A1 – Firms by economic sector

A2 – Summary statistics

A3 – Number of firms and means by sector and economic area

A4 – Correlation matrix (no constant returns to scale)

A5 – Correlation matrix (constant returns to scale)

A6 – Static analysis: Hausman test Ho: the difference on coefficient are not systematic (no constant returns to scale)

A7 – Static analysis: Hausman test Ho: the difference on coefficient are not systematic (constant returns to scale)

Appendix 2 – Variance correction for the two-step GMM estimator.

Appendix 3 :

B1 – Summary Statistics

B2 – Number of firms and means by sector and economic area

(4)

LIST OF TABLES

Table 2.1 Production function approach: Comparative analysis on foreign spillovers Table 2.2 Comparative analysis based on technological or geographic proximities Table 2.3 Knowledge production function approach: Comparative analysis

Table 2.4 Comparative analysis on Absorptive capacity Table 3.1 Constant returns to scale test

Table 3.2 Technological and geographic (in italic) proximities Table 3.3 Matrix of knowledge flows based on citation data Table 3.4 Summary statistics

Table 4.1 Levels of output and input per capita and Total Factor Productivity Table 4.2 Extended production function with variable returns to scale

Table 4.3 Extended production function with constant returns to scale Table 4.4 Robustness of results

Table 5.1 Technology and geographic based R&D spillovers (GMM-system) Table 5.2 Absorptive capacity (GMM-system estimates)

Table 6.1 Estimation results (1) Table 6.2 Estimation results (2)

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 2.1 Effects of R&D investments

Figure 3.1 Number of patents by economic area in the sample

Références

Documents relatifs

Table 2: Genes differentially expressed in GASCs and control

4- Aide-toi des additions de l’arbre pour écrire les résultats des multiplications.. 5- Invente au moins trois autres multiplications avec le

Remarque: L'apprentissage des tables de multiplications prend du temps et je ne m'attends pas à ce que cette leçon soit parfaitement sue du premier coup.. -LA TABLE

Menu pour 8 convives répartis sur 1 table de 4 couverts et 2 tables de 2 couverts. Moules marinière (1 table de 4) service

Menu pour 8 convives répartis sur 1 table de 4 couverts et 2 tables de 2 couverts.

Les vins seront choisis par le centre d'examen en fonction des approvisionnements ou des

Épreuve E1 – Pratique professionnelle SESSION 2015. Sous-épreuve U13

Results of marker-based genome scans for non-neutral population divergence based on divergence and diversity based tests, pairwise population comparisons arranged side-by-side on