HAL Id: jpa-00247536
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/jpa-00247536
Submitted on 1 Jan 1991
HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.
L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.
Collapse of grafted polyelectrolyte layer
O. Borisov, T. Birshtein, E. Zhulina
To cite this version:
O. Borisov, T. Birshtein, E. Zhulina. Collapse of grafted polyelectrolyte layer. Journal de Physique
II, EDP Sciences, 1991, 1 (5), pp.521-526. �10.1051/jp2:1991186�. �jpa-00247536�
Classification
Physics
Abstracts6140K 64.75 68 45 82 45
Coflapse of grafted polyelectrolyte layer
O. V.
Bonsov,
T. M.Birshtein,
E B. ZhulinaInstitute of Macromolecular
Compounds
of theAcademy
of Sciences of the USSR, 199004,Len~ngrad,
USSR(Received 5 November 1990,
accepted
31 January1991)
Absbact. The
theory descnbing
chain conformation in aplanar
layer ofgrafted polyelectrolyte
~polyampholyte) molecules and the conformational transition related to the collapse of this layer caused
by
the decrease in solventstrength
isdeveloped Depending
on the values of the layer parameters(grafting
and charge densities) this transition may occur as a continuous (cooperative)or as a first order
phase
transitionThe
layers
ofuncharged polymer
chainsgrafted
at one end ontoimpermeable
surface and immersed(or not)
in a solvent were theobjects
of intensive theoreticalinvestigations dunng
the last decade
[1-12]
The interest to these systems was initiatedpnmarily by
manypractical applications
thelayers
ofgrafted polymer
chains used to be the model of superstructuresformed
by block-copolymers
in the strong segregation limit,
the
grafting (or
theadsorption
at the anchorend)
of thepolymer
molecules can be used for the stencal stabilization andflocculation of colloidal
dispersions,
etc.At the same time the
grafted polymer layers appeared
to be veryinteresting
in the theoretical aspect. It was shown in a number of papers[1-6]
that under the conditions of strongoverlapping
the chains m thelayers
arealways
stretched in the direction normal to thegrafting surface,
so that their dimension in this direction scales with N as the dimensions of the free chain in the d-dimensional space, where d=
3
d~
andd~
is the effective dimension of the matnx(d~
= 2
,
0 and d
= 2 3 for the chains
grafted
onto theplanar, cylindrical
and
sphencal surface, respectively)
This effective reduction of thegrafted
chain dlrnensiona-lity
is manifested in the character of thecollapse
of thelayer
causedby
the decrease of the solventstrength.
As is known
[13-14]
for an individualchain,
tinscollapse (coil-globe transition)
occurs asthe second-order
phase
transition(the
first-orderphase
transition for the stiffchains).
In thelayers
of the chainsgrafted
onto thespherical
orcylindncal
matnces(an
effectivedimensionahty
d= 3 and 2
respectively)
the transition becomesbroader
thanin an isolated
macromolecule,
but retains itsphase
character In contrast tothis,
thecollapse
of thelayer
of the chainsgrafted
onto aplanar
surface(effectively
one-dimensionalchains)
occurs as a non-phase
conformational transitionaccompanied by
a smooth decrease of thelayer height
and anexclusion of the solvent from the
layer [6, 12].
To prevent anymisunderstanding,
we should note that the alternative result obtainedby Halpenn [15] (the possibility
of the first-order522 JOURNAL DE
PHYSIQUE
II M 5phase
transitionaccompanied by
the jumpwisechange
of the dimensions in theplanar layer) appeared
to be an artifact and was causedby
the use of the incorrectexpression
of the elastic free energy of thecompressed
chains(See [12]
for thediscussion).
All the results obtained
previously
referred to thelayers
ofuncharged grafted polymer
chains. We will start the theoretical
analysis
of thegrafted polyelectrolyte layers by
the present paper(some
resultsconcerning
the structure and interaction of theselayers
wererecently
obtainedby
Pincus[16],
thecorresponding
numencal calculations wereperformed
in
[17, 18]).
Up
to the present time a sufficient progress was achieved in the theoreticalinvestigation
of such condensedpolymer
systems aspolyelectrolyte
networks. In a senes of papersby
lchokhlov et al.[19, 20]
the chain conformations and the conformation transitions inpolyelectrolyte
networks wereinvestigated.
As wasshown,
thecollapse
of « dilute » networks causedby
the decrease in the solventstrength
occurs as the first orderphase
transition.The purpose of the present paper is the
investigation
of thecollapse
of thelayer
ofpolyelectrolyte
chainsgrafted
onto aplanar
surface causedby
the decrease in the solventstrength.
Thedependence
of the character of this conformational transition on the main parameters of thesystem (grafting
andcharge densities)
and thescaling
relations forlayer
dimensions in different regimes will beanalyzed.
Model.
Let us consider a
layer
formedby long (N
»I) polyelectrolyte ~polyampholyte)
chainsgrafted
at one end onto animpermeable planar
surface with adensity I/«
ensunng theoverlapping
ofpolymer
coils and inunersed m a dielectnc solvent. A chain part oflength equal
to chain thickness a is chosen as a unit. Forsimplicity
let the backbone of thepolyelectrolyte
chain beflexible,
i-e its Khun segmentlength
is A ma The nonelectrostatic volume interactions between the monomer units will be describedby
thesecond,
v, and thethird,
w, vinal coefficients. The formerdepends
ontemperature (solvent strength)
near the b-point as vmvor, where r =
(T-0)/T,
and we will consider thechanges
inlayer
charactenstics accompanying the variations of r, whereas the latter is
approximately independent
of temperature(solvent strength),
w m const(r).
Let every m-th unit of each chain carriespositively
ornegatively charging
group, so that the total number ofcharging
groups in the chain is
N/m.
Let m'mm be the mean distancealong
the chain betweenuncompensated charges
of the samesign,
so that the totalcharge
of the macromolecule isQ
=Ne/m'.
We haveQ
=
0,
m'mm in the isoelectnc case and m'mm for «pure»polyelectrolytes,
when the chains carry the groups of one sign. We will restnct ourconsideration
by weakly charged polyelectrolytes,
for whichm ~'~
» u =
e~/(eaTl (1)
where e is the dielectric constant of the solvent. In this case the intrachain Coulomb interactions do not lead to the
changes
of chain stiffness[21].
We will consider the situation when no salt is added into the solution The condition of the total
electroneutrahty
of the system results in the presence of SI N/m'
mobile counterions~per chain)
in the solution. These counterions are retainedby
infiniteplanar layer
ofgrafted polyions
near itjust
as near an infinitecharged
flat surface[22]
Under the conditionKH »
I,
whereI/K
is theDebye
screeninglength
in alayer
and His thelayer thickness,
all countenons are located in alayer.
In our consideration we will assume this condition to be fulfilled.Free energy.
For the
analysis
of the conformations ofgrafted polyelectrolyte
chains m alayer
we will use the standardapproach
based on the minimization of free energy which ispresented
as a surnof terms of different
physical origin.
AF
=
Afdci
+Afconc
+AFm
+Afco« (2)
We will restrict ourselves
by
thesimplest approximation
in which these terms areexpressed
as functions of the total
layer thickness, H, only. (A
preciseanalysis
of aplanar layer
ofuncharged grafted
chains shows[11, 12]
that this approximation allow to obtain allscaling dependences
oflayer
charactenstics on its parameters and toanalyze
the character of the transition related to thelayer collapse).
Thedependences
of the tennis inequation (2)
on H(through
theswelling
coefficient with respect to the chain Gaussian dimensions a=
H/N~'~
a orthrough
the mean unitdensity
in alayer
p=
Na~/( «Hi)
have thefollowing
forms~per chain)
:elastic
(conformational)
term~~~
~a~~+
Ina~,
a ml ~~~
free energy of volume interactions
AF~~~~ m NV p +
Nwp
~(4)
translational
entropy
of mobile$ountenons
AFm
m s inw/m') (5)
electrostatic
(correlation)
term, related to the correlations of localcharge density
AF~~~
m N(uim
j~'~ p ~'~(6j
Here and below all numencal coefficients are omitted and all
energetic
values areexpressed
in kT units.
Note that the correlation
(electrostatic)
contnbutionAF~~~, equation (6),
is written in theDebye-Huckel approxbnation,
I-e as forweakly
unidealplasma [23]
In the mosttypical
casesuml and this
approximation
is valid for the solutions ofweakly charged (m
mlpolyelectrolytes
m a wide range of concentrations p «1.Equafion
forswelling
coefficient.The minimization of the free energy, equations
(2)-(6),
with respect to a(or pi
leads to the equation for theequihbnum layer
tluckness Tlus equation may bepresented
in thefollowing
form :
a
(S
+ I a + Ga ~'~= Br +
Cla
, a m1
-a~~-,(S-I)a~Ga~'~=Br+Cla,
awl ~~~where
B m vo
N~'~a~/« (8.I)
C m wN
~(a~/«)~ (8.2)
524 JOURNAL DE
PHYSIQUE
II M 5are the renormahzed
parameters
of pair andtemary
nonelectrostatic interactions in alayer, respectively,
andG m N
~'~(u/m
)~'~(a~/«)~'~ (9)
is the renormahzed paranJeter of electrostatic interactions.
CoUapse
of thelayer.
At
S,
G=
0 equations
(7)
describe thedependence
of the thickness ofuncharged grafted layer_on
r and give thefollowing scaling
asymptotes for it.Na(vo ra~/«)~'~,
r » r *(10.1)
~"
Na(w~'~a~/«)~'~, jr
«(r* (10.2)
Na(wa~/(vo jr
«)),
r « r *(10.3)
in the regions of
strong,
b- and poorsolvent, respectively (comp [5, 6]).
The temperatures± r *
m ± C
~'~/B
= ±(w~'~/vo)(a~/«)~'~ (l I)
correspond
to the crossover between different regions The decrease in r leads to the continuous(without
ajump)
decrease in thelayer thickness,
the transition of thelayer
into acollapsed (globular)
state is not of thephase
character(see [6, 12]
fordetails).
In the
general
case of agrafted polyelectrolyte layer,
theanalysis
ofequations (7)
shows that the character of thedependence
of theequihbnum layer
thickness H(swelling
coefficienta)
on the solventstrength,
r, is determinedby
the relation between the parametersC,
S and G and three different regimes of thelayer
behavior can bedistinguished.
I)
The regimeof
«uncharged» layer
CmS~, G~'~
In this case thepolyelectrolyte
effects in a
layer
are weak companng withstrong
volume interactions. The thickness of thelayer
is givenby
equations(10), (11)
Thecollapse
of thelayer
with decrease in r occurssmoothly just
as thecollapse
of thelayer
ofgrafted uncharged
chains(Fig. I,
curveI).
It's easy to see that the condition C »S~
means that under the conditions of strong and o-solvent there is less than one mobile ion(or
oneuncompensated charge)
per one blob[1, 2, 5]
of thestretched chain in a
layer
2)
The«polyelectrolyte»
regime CmS~, G«S~'~C~'~(m'mm
~) In this case theequllibnum layer
dimensions under the conditions of strong and b-solvent are determinedby
the
competition
between the translationalentropy
of mobile countenons(Eq (5))
and thec£
2
5
qf
Fig.
I Different types ofdependence
of the swelling coefficient, a, of thegrafted polyelectrolyte
~polyampholyte) layer
on the solventstrength,
r(all
comments to the curves are in thetext)
elastic free energy of chain
stretching (Eq. (3))
andslightly
decrease with thedecreasing
in the solventstrength
HmNam'~~'~ (12)
1-e the
polyelectrolyte
effectspredominate
over the volume interactions. This situation retains in the range of r~~ wr « 0 where
r~~m-S~'~C~'~/Bm-m'~~'~w~'~. (13)
Note that the condition C «
S~ provides r~'
« r*. At thepoint
r= r~~, the attractive
pair
interactions become strong
enough
to compete with countenon entropy and thelayer
thickness suffers a jumpwlse decrease up to the value of the thickness of
uncharged layer
at the same r(Fig. I,
curve2)
3)
Isoelectricregime.
CmG~'(
G »S~'~C~'~(m~ mm').
In this case the number ofoppositely charged
groups in the chains islarge
and their attraction(correlation
term,Eq. (6))
gives a sufficient contribution m the total free energy of thelayer.
If m' mm ~, thiselectrostatic attraction results m the
collapsed
state of thelayer
even under the conditions ofstrong solvent
(Fig.1, curve3),
where thelayer
dimensions are determinedby
thecompetition between electrostatic attraction and pair
repulsive
volume interactions :H m
Na(vo r)~ (miu)~ (a~ia-) (14)
In the intermediate case,
m~
« m' « m~, under the conditions of a strong solvent the
layer
is m a swollen state,
equation (10.I),
but the decrease inr leads to the
collapse
of thelayer
into the state described above
(Eq (14))
Thls transition occurssmoothly
at rmm~ ~'~(
«la
~)~'~ if G »S~'~
or with a jump inlayer
thickness at rm
m'/m~
if G «S~'~ (Fig. I,
curves
4, 5, respectively).
The further decrease in the solvent
strength,
r, transforms thesystem
into theb-conditions,
where thelayer
thickness is determinedby
thecompetition
betweenrepulsive
temary volumeinteractions and electrostatic attraction
H m Naw
~'~(miu (a~ia-) (15)
The
b-region
occupies the range ofr,*
« r «(r,*(,
where* -1 113
(16)
T, m-m W'
~Note,
that at C «S~,
m~« m' we have
r,*
» r *).
At r «
r,*
thelayer
passes into theordinary globular
state, equation(10 3)
Discussion.
The jumpwise
dependence
of the dimensions of theplanar layer
ofgrafted polyelectrolyte
chains on the solvent
strength
in contrast to that of thelayer
ofuncharged polymer
chains indicates that thecollapse
of theplanar grafted polyelectrolyte lajer
may occur as the first orderphase
transition. This result is not surpnsmg, because the translational entropy of mobile countenons, which isresponsible
for thiseffect,
contributes an affectivelong-range
interaction into the system.
The main
relationships
of thecollapse
ofgrafted polyelectrolyte layer
coincide with that of thecollapse
ofpolyelectrolyte
networks[19, 20].
The main difference is the appearance of the526 JOURNAL DE
PHYSIQUE
II M 5regime in which strong volume interactions in
densely grafted layer
dominate over allpolyelectrolyte
effectsNote
that,
as was shownabove,
thelayer
ofstrongly charged
andmoderately densely grafted polyelectrolyte
chains remains in a swollen state far below theb-point.
This iswhy
this kind ofprotecting layers provides
a stencal stabilization of colloidalparticles
below the b- point in contrast tostabilizing layers
ofuncharged
chains[24]
Note addkd m
proof
Recently
Y. Rabin and S. Alexander(Europhys
Lett. 13(1990) 49)
have shown that if the chains in thelayer
are stretchedby
the extemal force the chainelasticity
must be descnbedby
the Pincus law
(AF~j
m(H/(N~'~ar~'~))~'~)
i-e differs from that of Gaussian chains. Ananalogous
situation takesplace
in the «polyelectrolyte
» regime when the osmotic pressure of countenons acts as an extemalstretching
force.Analysis
shows that if we take this effect into account the factor m' ~'~ inequation (12)
obtained in the mean fieldapproximation
should bereplaced by
thescaling
factor m' ~'~r
~'~ at r » m' ~'~.
References
[Ii
ALEXANDER S, JPhys
38(1977)
983[2] DE GENNES P. G, Macromolecules13
(1980)
1069[3] BIRSHTEtN T M., ZHULINA E. B,
Polymer
Science USSR 25(1983)
2165[4] ZHULINA E. B,
Polymer
Science USSR 26(1984)
885 ;Vysokomol.
Soedm.(B)
25(1983)
884 [5] BIRSHTEIN T M., ZHULINA E B,Polymer
25(1984)
1453[6] BORISOV O. V., ZHULINA E B, BIRSHTEIN T. M., Vysokomol Soedm
(A),
30(1988)
767.[7] MILNER S T, WITTEN T. A., CATES M. E,
Europhys.
Leit 5(1988)
413.[8] MILNER S T,
Europhys
Lett 7 (1988) 695[9] MILNER S T, WITTEN T A, CATES M E, Macromolecules 21
(1988)
2610[10] SKVORTSOV A M, GORBUNOV A. A, PAVLUSHKOV I V, ZHULINA E B, BORISOV O V,
PRYAMITSYN V A,
Polymer
Science USSR 30(1988)
1706.ii Ii
ZHULINA E B., PRYAMITSYN V A., BORISOV O V,Polymer
Science USSR 31(1989)
205 [12] ZHULINA E. B, BORISOV O V, PRYAMITSYN V A, BIRSHTEIN T M., Macromolecules 24(1991)
140 [13] LifsHiTz I M
,
GROSBERG A. Yu, KHOKHLOV A. R.,
Uspehi,
Fiz Nauk (USSR ) 127(1979)
353 [14] BIRSHTEIN T M, PRYAMITSYN V. A.,Vysokomol
Soedm. (A) 29(1987)
1858, Macromolecules24
(1991)
m press[15] HALPERIN A, J. Phys France 49 (1988) 547.
[16] PiNcUs P, Colloid Stabilization with Grafted
Polyelectrolytes,
prepnnt.[17] MIKLAVIC S J, MARCELIA S, J
Phys
Chem. 92(1988)
6718[18] MISRA S, VARANASI S, VARANASI P P., Macromolecules 22
(1989)
4173.[19] VASILEVSKAYA V. V., KHOKHLOV A. R., in Mathematical Methods for
Polymer Investigations,
ed SCBI, Poustchino, USSR
(1982)
45[20] STARODUBTSEV S G, KHOKHLOV A R, PAVLOVA N R, VASiLEVSKAYA V V,
Vysokomal
Soedin. (B) 27
(1985)
500.[21] ODIJK
T,
J.Polym
Sci.,Polym Phys
Ed 15(1977)
447, SKOLNICK J, FIXMAN M., Macromolecules 12(1977)
688[22] ISRAELACHVILI J N, Intermolecular and Surface Forces