• Aucun résultat trouvé

Extreme wave pressures and loads on a pile-supported wharf deck: influences of air gap and wave direction

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Extreme wave pressures and loads on a pile-supported wharf deck: influences of air gap and wave direction"

Copied!
3
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Publisher’s version / Version de l'éditeur:

Vous avez des questions? Nous pouvons vous aider. Pour communiquer directement avec un auteur, consultez la première page de la revue dans laquelle son article a été publié afin de trouver ses coordonnées. Si vous n’arrivez pas à les repérer, communiquez avec nous à PublicationsArchive-ArchivesPublications@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca.

Questions? Contact the NRC Publications Archive team at

PublicationsArchive-ArchivesPublications@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca. If you wish to email the authors directly, please see the first page of the publication for their contact information.

https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/droits

L’accès à ce site Web et l’utilisation de son contenu sont assujettis aux conditions présentées dans le site LISEZ CES CONDITIONS ATTENTIVEMENT AVANT D’UTILISER CE SITE WEB.

Coastal Engineering 2018: Proceedings of the 36th International Conference, pp.

5-6, 2018-08-03

READ THESE TERMS AND CONDITIONS CAREFULLY BEFORE USING THIS WEBSITE.

https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/copyright

NRC Publications Archive Record / Notice des Archives des publications du CNRC :

https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/view/object/?id=7bedd5a8-a914-4770-8347-07ea573e54db

https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/voir/objet/?id=7bedd5a8-a914-4770-8347-07ea573e54db

NRC Publications Archive

Archives des publications du CNRC

This publication could be one of several versions: author’s original, accepted manuscript or the publisher’s version. / La version de cette publication peut être l’une des suivantes : la version prépublication de l’auteur, la version acceptée du manuscrit ou la version de l’éditeur.

For the publisher’s version, please access the DOI link below./ Pour consulter la version de l’éditeur, utilisez le lien DOI ci-dessous.

https://doi.org/10.9753/icce.v36.waves.5

Access and use of this website and the material on it are subject to the Terms and Conditions set forth at

Extreme wave pressures and loads on a pile-supported wharf deck:

influences of air gap and wave direction

(2)

EXTREME WAVE PRESSURES AND LOADS ON A PILE-SUPPORTED WHARF DECK -

INFLUENCES OF AIR GAP AND WAVE DIRECTION

 

Andrew Cornett, National Research Council Canada, Andrew.Cornett@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca

 

INTRODUCTION

Many deck-on-pile structures are located in shallow water depths at elevations low enough to be inundated by large waves during intense storms or tsunami. Many researchers have studied wave-in-deck loads over the past decade using a variety of theoretical, experimental, and numerical methods. Wave-in-deck loads on various pile supported coastal structures such as jetties, piers, wharves and bridges have been studied by Tirindelli et al. (2003), Cuomo et al. (2007, 2009), Murali et al. (2009), and Meng et al. (2010). All these authors analyzed data from scale model tests to investigate the pressures and loads on beam and deck elements subject to wave impact under various conditions. Wave-in-deck loads on fixed offshore structures have been studied by Murray et al. (1997), Finnigan et al. (1997), Bea et al. (1999, 2001), Baarholm et al. (2004, 2009), and Raaij et al. (2007). These authors have studied both simplified and realistic deck structures using a mixture of theoretical analysis and model tests. Other researchers, including Kendon et al. (2010), Schellin et al. (2009), Lande et al. (2011) and Wemmenhove et al. (2011) have demonstrated that various CFD methods can be used to simulate the interaction of extreme waves with both simple and more realistic deck structures, and predict wave-in-deck pressures and loads.

Despite considerable previous research, establishing reliable estimates of extreme hydrodynamic pressures and forces on low elevation deck structures for use in design remains challenging due to the complex and somewhat chaotic nature of the wave interactions that occur. In this paper, new results from an extensive set of 3D scale model tests conducted to support the design of a large free-standing pile-supported wharf (or pier) are presented. The important influences of deck clearance (or air gap) and wave direction on the extreme pressures and loads exerted on the deck slab and horizontal support beams will be explored and discussed.

LABORATORY EXPERIMENTS

Experiments were conducted in which a detailed 1:35 scale model of the outer portion of the wharf structure, the mooring and berthing dolphins, and the surround-ing bathymetry was set up in a 63m x 14m wave basin and exposed to scaled reproductions of the extreme waves and water levels expected at the site (Fig. 1-3). Most tests were conducted with 3-hour realizations of irregular waves synthesized from JONSWAP spectra, although tests with regular waves were also performed. Test conditions were selected to simulate extreme seastates spanning return periods of approximately 50 to 2,000 years. Different wave headings were simulated by rotating the model structure within the wave basin. The deck model consisted of a solid deck slab supported

on a welded grid of longitudinal and transverse aluminum beams, all with rectangular cross-section (Fig. 2). The joints between the beams and the solid deck were sealed to prevent air and/or water from escaping. The deck was supported on a rigid assembly of 25 circular steel piles and 16 pile caps. The elevation of the pile assemblies and the pier deck could be varied in discrete increments by inserting spacer blocks below the base of each pile. Deck elevations from +13.9 m to +18.5m were modelled. The local pressures on the surface of the model were measured in 26 locations using 19 mm stainless steel pressure sensors suitable for measuring impulsive pressure fluctuations with rapid rise times. The forces and moments acting on portions of the pier deck were measured in three locations. At each location, sections of the pier deck were isolated from the surrounding deck structure and suspended from a 6-axis load cell mounted on a rigid beam located above the deck.

Figure 1 – 1/35 scale model of deck-on-pile wharf structure

Figure 2 – Underside of the model deck

(3)

INFLUENCE OF DECK CLEARANCE

Results from nearly 400 tests have been analyzed to reveal the important influences of air gap and wave heading on extreme pressures and deck loads. Fig. 4 shows three examples of the relationships between wave-in-deck load and deck clearance (air gap) developed from this dataset. These figures show the maximum dimensionless force (F*) recorded on an exposed portion of the deck during 3-hours of irregular wave attack as a function of dimensionless deck clearance (C*). The design curves shown in these figures can be written in the form

(1)

The coefficients a and b that provide a good fit to the data are given in Table 1.

a)

b)

c)

Figure 4 – Influence of air gap on peak wave-in-deck loads.

Table 1 – Value of coefficients a and b in equation 1

Force component a b Fx* (horizontal) 0.45 0.17 Fz* uplift 0.10 0.15 Fz* suction 0.10 0.30

 

CONCLUSIONS

An extensive set of laboratory experiments has been conducted to investigate the pressures and loads exerted by steep shallow-water waves on portions of a large deck-on-pile structure. The presentation and full

paper will present new experimental data and provide new insights into the character and magnitude of the hydrodynamic pressures and loads exerted on pile-supported deck structures by steep shallow-water waves, with a focus on the important influences of deck clearance (air gap) and wave heading.

REFERENCES

Baarholm, Faltinsen (2004): Wave impacts underneath horizontal decks. J. Mar Sci Tech 9:1-13

Baarholm, Stansberg (2004): Extreme vertical wave impact on the deck of a gravity-based structure (GBS) platform. Proc. Conf. on Rogue Waves. Baarholm (2009): Experimental and theoretical study of

3-D effects on vertical wave-in-deck forces. Proc.

2009 OMAE Conf., paper 79560, Honolulu, USA.

Bea, Xu, Stear, Ramos (1999): Wave forces on decks of offshore platforms. J. Waterway, Port, Coastal and

Ocean Eng. 124-3 136-144.

Bea, Iversen, Xu (2001): Wave-in-deck forces on offshore platforms. J. Offshore Mechanics and Arctic

Eng. 123 10-21.

Chen (2010): Time domain simulation of nonlinear wave impact loads on fixed offshore platform and decks.

Proc. 20th ISOPE Conf., pp 364-371.

Cuomo, Tirindelli, Allsop (2007): Wave-in-deck loads on exposed jetties. J. Coastal Eng. 54 657-679. Cuomo, Shimosako, Takahashi (2009): Wave-in-deck

loads on coastal bridges and the role of air. J.

Coastal Eng. 56 (2009) 793-809.

Finnigan, Petrauskas (1997): Wave-in-deck forces. Proc.

6th ISOPE Conf., Honolulu, USA.

Kendon, Pakozdi, Baarholm, Berthelsen, Stansberg, Enger (2010): Wave-in-deck impact: comparing CFD, simple methods, and model tests. Proc. 2010 OMAE Conf., paper 20860, Shanghai, China.

Lande, Johannesen (2011): CFD Analysis of Deck Impact in Irregular Waves. Proc. 2011 OMAE Conf., paper 49418, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

Meng, Chen, Yan (2010): Wave interaction with deck of jetty on a slope. Proc. 2010 Int. Conf. on Coastal Eng., Beijing, China.

Murali, Sundar, Setti (2009): Wave-induced pressures and forces on deck slabs near the free surface. J.

Waterway, Port, Coastal and Ocean Eng. 135:269-277.

Murray, Winsor (1997) Impact forces on a jacket deck in regular waves and irregular wave groups. Proc. 1997

Offshore Tech. Conf., paper 8360, Houston, USA.

Raaij, Gudmestad (2007): Wave-in-deck loading on fixed steel jacket decks. J. Marine Structures 20, 164-184. Schellin, Peric, Moctar (2009): Wave-deck-load analysis

for a jack-up platform. Proc. 2009 OMAE Conf., paper 79633, Honolulu, USA.

Tirindelli, Cuomo, Allsop, Lamberti (2003): Wave-in-deck forces on jetties and related structures. Proc. 13th

ISOPE Conf., pp 562-569.

Wemmenhove, Lefranc (2011): CFD Calculations of Wave-in-Deck Load on a Jacket Platform – Impact Pressure Decrease due to Air Pocket Formation.

Proc. 2011 OMAE Conf., paper 49515. Rotterdam,

Figure

Figure 1 –  1/35 scale model of deck-on-pile wharf structure
Figure 4 –  Influence of air gap on peak wave-in-deck loads.

Références

Documents relatifs

6 Remaining uncertainties in Arctic aerosol research The NETCARE research outlined above has provided novel insights into (1) the biogenic sources of gases that can im- pact the

In Section 3 the stochastic approach is coupled with a water entry model to compute the distribution of hydrodynamic loads on a foil exposed to wave impacts.. Theoretical

The so-called gelatinous layer (G-layer) is formed soon after the start of the lignification in tension wood. Although the total number of cells produced on the side of tension

The comparison of reliability indices between the two design methods as a function of the span length is shown in Figure 6.38, Figure 6.39, and Figure 6.40 for the

Then, the numerical tool is applied to Saint Jean de Luz and Bayonne sites (South west Atlantic coast, France) in order to evaluate the mean annual power production, and

Based on the potential theory, a semi-analytical method has been presented in order to solve the radiation and scattering problem which provides hydrodynamic parameters in heaving

Assessment in fatigue of an orthotropic steel deck bridge under traffic loads and impact of abnormal loads.. Case of

The aim of this chapter is to investigate dry dense avalanches through small-scale laboratory tests on granular ows in order to study their dynamics, the force that this type of