HAL Id: hal-02190071
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02190071
Submitted on 21 Jul 2019
HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.
L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.
Copyright
Uncertainty quantification in a nonlinear transmission model for Zika virus
Eber Dantas, Michel Tosin, Americo Cunha Jr
To cite this version:
Eber Dantas, Michel Tosin, Americo Cunha Jr. Uncertainty quantification in a nonlinear transmission model for Zika virus. Conference on Perspectives on Nonlinear Dynamics 2019 (PNLD 2019), Jul 2019, São Paulo, Brazil. 2018. �hal-02190071�
Uncertainty quantification in a nonlinear transmission model for Zika virus
Eber Dantas Michel Tosin Americo Cunha Jr
[email protected] [email protected] [email protected] NUMERICO – Nucleus of Modeling and Experimentation with Computers
Introduction
• Zika virus: global widespread and con- nection with congenital diseases
• 2016: Zika becomes a public health emergency of international concern
• Main vector: Aedes mosquitoes Aedes aegypti
• 30 countries in the last 20 years
• 140,000 confirmed cases in Brazil
• 3,000 confirmed cases of related birth de- fects and growth disorders in Brazil
Zika virus
Objectives
• Incorporate a general uncertainty quantification framework
• Perform sensitivity analysis and construct confidence bands
• Generate more robust predictions and diverse statistics
Computational Model
Compartmental Model
v
h h h h
v v
γ
(βvIh)/Nh
α
v(βhIv)/Nv
α
hHuman population
Vector population δ N
vδ
δ δ
Dynamical system
dS
hdt = − β
hS
hI
vN
v, dS
vdt = δ N
v− β
vS
vI
hN
h− δ S
v,
dE
hdt = β
hS
hI
vN
v− α
hE
h, dE
vdt = β
vS
vI
hN
h− (α
v+ δ) E
v,
dI
hdt = α
hE
h− γ I
h, dI
vdt = α
vE
v− δ I
v,
dR
hdt = γ I
h, dC
dt = α
hE
h. + Initial Conditions
Quantities of interest (QoI)
• Cumulative cases of infectious: C (t) = R
tτ=0
α
hE
h(τ ) dτ
• New cases per week: N
w= C
w− C
w−1, w = 1 . . . 52 , N
1= C
1UQ Framework
Stochastic modeling
Computational Model
Y
t= M (X, t)
Input Parameters
X ∼ FX
Output QoI
Y ∼ FYt
Sensitivity analysis (SA)
The Hoeffding-Sobol’ decomposition for n iid inputs X
i∼ U (0, 1) gives Y
t= M
0+ X
1≤i≤n
M
i(X
i) + X
1≤i<j≤n
M
ij(X
i, X
j) + · · · + M
1···n(X
1· · · X
n) ,
M0 = E[Yt], Mi(Xi) = E
Yt|Xi
−M0, Mij(Xi, Xj) = E
Yt|Xi, Xj
−M0−Mi−Mj.
Sobol’ Indices: interaction effect of inputs in u S
u= Var
M
u(X
u) Var
M (X)
Metamodelling: Polynomial Chaos
The Polynomial Chaos Expansion of model Y = M (X), for a multivari- ate orthonormal polynomial family Φ
αwith coefficients y
α,
Y
t= X
α∈Nk
y
α(t) Φ
α(X) , enables analytic computation of Sobol Indices:
S
u= X
α∈ Au
y
α2,
X
α∈ A\0
y
α2, A
u= { α ∈ A : i ∈ u ⇐⇒ α
i6 = 0 }
Maximum entropy principle
The most unbiased distribution of X maximizes the entropy
ε p
X(X)
= − Z
Sn
p
X(x) ln p
X(x) dx ,
while abiding to µ + 1 restrictions Z
Sn
p x (x) dx = 1 ,
Z
Sn
g (x) p x (x) dx = b ,
where g(x) : R
n→ R
µand b ∈ R
µcompiles the available information MaxEnt distribution with µ + 1 restrictions
p
X(x) = 1
Sn(x) exp( − λ
0) exp
−
µ
X
i=1
λ
ig
i(x)
Results
Sobol’ Indices
Calibration tuning
10 20 30 40 50
time (weeks)
0 100 200 300
number of people
103
Cumulative infectious
0 6 13 19 25
number of people
103
10 20 30 40 50
time (weeks)
data first new
New cases
First probabilistic model
R.V.: β
h, β
v∼ MaxEnt. b: support, mean.
10 20 30 40 50
time (weeks)
0.0 1.5 3.0 4.5 6.0
number of people
105
C (t) – CV : 0%
10 20 30 40 50
time (weeks)
0.0 0.8 1.5 2.3 3.0
number of people
104
95% prob.
mean nominal data
N
w– CV : 0%
Second probabilistic model
R.V.: β
h, β
v∼ MaxEnt. b: support, mean, dispersion
10 20 30 40 50
time (weeks)
0.0 1.5 3.0 4.5 6.0
number of people
105
C (t) – CV : 5%
10 20 30 40 50
time (weeks)
0.0 0.8 1.5 2.3 3.0
number of people
104
95% prob.
mean nominal data
N
w– CV : 5%
10 20 30 40 50
time (weeks)
0.0 1.5 3.0 4.5 6.0
number of people
105
C (t) – CV : 10%
10 20 30 40 50
time (weeks)
0.0 0.8 1.5 2.3 3.0
number of people
104
95% prob.
mean nominal data
N
w– CV : 10%
Third probabilistic model
R.V.: β
h, β
v, CV ∼ MaxEnt. b: support and mean for β , support for CV.
10 20 30 40 50
time (weeks)
0.0 1.5 3.0 4.5 6.0
number of people
105
C (t) – CV ∼ U (5%, 10%)
10 20 30 40 50
time (weeks)
0.0 0.8 1.5 2.3 3.0
number of people
104
95% prob.
mean nominal data
N
w– CV ∼ U (5%, 10%)
Statistics and predictions
Histograms for the time average of cumulative infectious
10-5
1.0 1.8 2.5 3.3 4.0
number of people 0.0
0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0
probability density function
105
PDF mean mean std 95% prob.
C (t) – CV : 0%
10-5
1.0 1.8 2.5 3.3 4.0
number of people 0.0
0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0
probability density function
105
PDF mean mean std 95% prob.
C (t) – CV ∼ U (5%, 10%) Evolution of QoI histograms per epidemiological week
0.0 1.5 3.0 4.5 6.0
number of people
0.0 0.4 0.7 1.1 1.5
probability density function
10-4
105 5
7 10 15 20
25 30 35 45 52
C (t) – CV ∼ U (5%, 10%)
0.0 0.8 1.5 2.3 3.0
number of people
0.0 0.8 1.5 2.3 3.0
probability density function
10-3
104 5
7 10 15 20
25 30 35 45 52
N
w– CV ∼ U (5%, 10%) Cumulative distribution function for the time average until EW 20
1.0 1.3 1.5 1.8 2.0
number of people
0.0 0.3 0.5 0.8 1.0
probability
100
105
C (t) – CV ∼ U (5%, 10%)
0.8 1.0 1.2 1.5 1.7
number of people
0.0 0.3 0.5 0.8 1.0
probability
100
104
N
w– CV ∼ U (5%, 10%)
Final Remarks
• Implementation of a UQ framework with robust determination of pa- rameter distributions in the epidemiological context via MaxEnt
• Observation of general parametric behavior exposed via SA
• Investigation of dispersion influence, changes in skewness, evolution of stochastic QoIs and statistical simulations
Acknowledgements
References
[1] E. Dantas, M. Tosin and A. Cunha Jr, Calibration of a SEIR–SEI epidemic model to describe Zika virus outbreak in Brazil. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 338: 249-259, 2018.
doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2018.06.024
[2] E. Dantas, M. Tosin and A. Cunha Jr. Uncertainty quantification in the nonlinear dynamics of Zika virus, 2019. hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02005320
[3] C. Soize. Uncertainty Quantification: an Accelerated Course with Advanced Applications in Compu- tational Engineering, Springer, 2017.