HAL Id: jpa-00221095
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/jpa-00221095
Submitted on 1 Jan 1981
HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of
sci-entific research documents, whether they are
pub-lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.
L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.
TEMPERATURE DEPENDENCE OF DISLOCATION
RESONANCE DAMPING
H. Schmidt, D. Lenz, K. Lücke
To cite this version:
JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE
CoZZoque C5, suppZ4ment au nO1O, Tome 42, octobre 2981 page c5-351
TEMPERATURE DEPENDENCE OF D I S L O C A T I O N RESONANCE DAMPING
H. Schrnidt, D. Lenz and K . Liicke
I n s t i t u t
Fiir
AZZgemeine MetaZZkunde und MetaZZphysik,RWTH
Aachen, F.R. G.A b s t r a c t . - We have s i m u l t a n e o u s l y measured t h e f r e q u e n c y dependence (10 t o
- -
--
90 MHz) o f t h e u l t r a s o n i c a t t e n u a t i o n a and sound v e l o c i t y v on h i g h p u r i t y Cu as f u n c t i o n o f t e m p e r a t u r e (4.2
s
T<
300K). I r r a d i a t i o n p i n n i n g was used t o s e p a r a t e t h e d i s l o c a t i o n resonance (DR) c o n t r i b u t i o n s aD and AVD/v0. The e v a l u a t i o n o f d a t a i s c o n s i d e r a b l y improved b y t h e use o f t h e f r e q u e n c y depen- dence o f A v ~ / v ~ , e s p e c i a l l y a t T < 50K where aD becomes masked by t h e phonon- e l e c t r o n a t t e n u a t i o n . The observed D R - e f f e c t s have been analyzed i n terms o f t h e Granato-Lucke DR-theory. From t h e d e r i v e d t e m p e r a t u r e dependences o f A L ~ , B/A and t 2 6 ( A d i s l o c a t i o n d e n s i t y , L d i s l o c a t i o n mean f r e e l o o p l e n g t h be- tween p i n n i n g p o i n t s , B d i s l o c a t i o n d r a g c o e f f i c i e n t ) we f i n d ( i ) B(T) i n agreement w i t h c u r r e n t t h e o r i e s and B(273K (4+
2 ) . 1 0 - ~ ~ s / m ~ i n c l u d i n g t h e e l e c t r o n d r a g c o e f f i c i e n t Be = ( If
2)aIO-&;/m2 ; ( i i ) L t o be independent o f T b u t A t o decrease w i t h T down t o t h e l o w e s t T. T h i s A(T) b e h a v i o u r i s d i s - cussed.1. I n t r o d u c t i o n . - MHz-measurements o f d i s l o c a t i o n resonance (DR) damping a r e a v a l u - a b l e t o o l f o r t h e i n v e s t i g a t i o n o f t h e i n t e r a c t i o n o f d i s l o c a t i o n s w i t h phonons and e l e c t r o n s ( d r a g c o e f f i c i e n t B /1,2/). F o r t h e e v a l u a t i o n o f B(T) f r o m such measurements i t has been t a c i t l y assumed t h a t t h e " d i s l o c a t i o n resonance s t r e n q t h " ( b e i n g p r o p o r t i o -
2
n a l t o AL ( w i t h
A
d i s l o c a t i o n d e n s i t y and L d i s l o c a t i o n l o o p l enoth) i s independent o f T. However, t h e r e a r e MHz-results which i n d i c a t e t h a t such a n assumption m i g h t n o t be j u s t i f i e d : ( i ) w i t h t h e s t a n d a r d MHz-pulse-echo t e c h n i q u e T-dependent changes o f L e a s i l y r e s u l t f r o m d i s l o c a t i o n break-away caused by t h e d i f f e r e n t thermal expansion o f t r a n s d u c e r and sample ( Q S D - e f f e c t /3,4/) ; ( i i ) sound v e l o c i t y measurements by A l e r s2
and Zimmermann 15 y e a r s ago showed t h a t t h e d i s l o c a t i o n modulus d e f e c t F.1D
-
AL decrea- ses w i t h d e c r e a s i n g T down t o 0.3K. B o t h p o i n t s c a s t doubts on MHz-B(T)-measurements. F u r t h e r m o r e t h e MD r e s u l t s cannot be e x p l a i n e d i n t h e frame o f t h e c l a s s i c a l v i b r a t i n g s t r i n g model as worked o u t by K o e h l e r /6/ and Granato and Lucke /7/. W i t h t h e p r e s e n t work we i n t e n d t o c o n t r i b u t e t o c l a r i f i c a t i o n o f t h e M H Z - " A L ~ " problem by simultaneous measurements o f t h e f r e q u e n c y dependence o f d i s l o c a t i o n damping & d i s l o c a t i o n modulus d e f e c t betweenR'r
and 4.2K.2. Experimental.- Our experiments were performed on a < I l l > o r i e n t e d Cu s i n g l e c r y s t a l w i t h RRR 1100. T h i s RRR r e f e r s t o e l e c t r i c a l p u r i t y s i n c e i t i s measured a f t e r i n - t e r n a l o x i d a t i o n (170h, IIOOK, po2 = 0.1 Pa) o f a 100 ppm Fe doped c r y s t a l (PRR z 15). T h i s t r e a t m e n t r e s u l t s i n an i n c r e a s e d d i s l o c a t i o n l o o p l e n g t h L as compared w i t h h i g h c h e m i c a l l y p u r e c r y s t a l s and a l s o r e n d e r s t h e sample i n s e n s i t i v e t o quartz-sample-de-
C S - 3 5 2 JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE
f o r m a t i o n (QSD) e f f e c t s /8,4/. [Both i s e x p l a i n e d by assuming t h a t t h e p r e c i p i t a t i o n o f Fe,OY d u r i n g i n t e r n a l o x i d a t i o n a t t h e same t i m e cleans t h e l a t t i c e f r o m Fe and some r e s i d u a l i m p u r i t i e s w h i c h o t h e r w i s e form C o t t r e l l c l o u d s d u r i n g h e a t t r e a t m e n t and thus make t h e h i g h p u r i t y Cu s e n s i t i v e t o QSD]. The sample p r e p a r a t i o n , y - i r r a d i - a t i o n and t h e t e c h n i q u e s o f a t t e n u a t i o n and v e l o c i t y measurements a r e d e s c r i b e d i n /g/. The c o o l i n g was performed by a c o n v e n t i o n a l ~ e 4 - e v a p o r a t i o n c r y o s t a t . F o r t h e temperature measurements a c a l i b r a t e d P t r e s i s t o r resp. Si-Diode was used. D u r i n g t h e a ( f ) , v ( f ) measurements t h e temperature was h e l d c o n s t a n t w i t h i n
+
0.1 K.3. Experimental R e s u l t s and E v a l u a t i o n . - Fig.1 ( a ,b) shows t h e a ( T ) ( f i g . l a ) and v ( T ) ( f i g . l b ) d a t a which c o u l d be measured o n l y up t o 90 MHz because o f h i g h a t t e n u a t i o n i n t h e p r e s e n t c r y s t a l (measurable l i m i t
2
: 4.5 dB/us). A t T > 100K a ( T ) i s d i f f e r e n t a t l o w and h i g h f: a t 10 MHz a c o n t i n u o u s a ( T ) decrease, a t 90 MHz a broad maximum around 150K i s observed. The s t e e p a ( T ) i n c r e a s e a t T < 50K i s due t o phonon-electron ab- s o r p t i o n (PEA, c . f . / I D / ) . The d i s l o c a t i o n c o n t r i b u t i o n a D ( T ) i s o b t a i n e d b y s u b t r a c - t i o n o f t h e background a t t e n u a t i o n aB(T) measured a f t e r s t r o n g y - i r r a d i a t i o n and i n - c l u d i n g t h e PEA c o n t r i b u t i o n apE ( c . f . dashedc u r v e f o r 50 MHz i n f i g . l a ) . I n c o n t r a s t t o t h e u n i r r a d i a t e d s t a t e s a f t e r i r r a d i a t i o n a Q S D - e f f e c t a i s o b s e r v e d ( f i g . l a ) w h i c h QSD i s due t o d i s l o c a t i o n break-away f r o m i r r a - d i a t i o n p i n n i n g p o i n t s (PP). A f t e r s t r o n g
-
- 3 0 i r r a d i a t i o n a << a(gy=O); we use t h e e x t r a - QS D p o l a t e d ag (dashed d o t t e d l i n e ) as n o n - d i s l o - c a t i o n background f o r 50 < T < 150K. We p o i n t 0 50 100 150 200 250 300o u t t h a t a t T < 50K aD 2 O.la and apE 0.9a Temperature T [K]
whereas a t T > 100K aD 2 0,9a, i . e . a t l o w T FIG l a
52801 -- .
aD becomes masked by PEA. Cv.long wave, q ~ ~ ( l ~ l ) . ~ = S D M H Z
I
F i g . l b shows v ( T ) (measured s i m u l - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ! t a n e o u s l y w i t h u ( T ) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , f i g . l a ) and t h e "background" v e l o c i t y v, (T) (measured a f t e r s t r o n g y i r r a d i a t i o n s i m u l t a n e o u s l y w i t h aB, f i g . l a ) . The v ( T ) - d a t a f o r t h e o t h e r frequen- c i e s b e i n g c l o s e t o v ( T ) have been o m i t t e d ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 5,ml L -. .-
_
A -f o r sake o f c l a r i t y ; vo(T) i s f - i n d e p e n d e n t
o
50loo
150 200 250 360and g i v e n by v ~ , ~ ~ ~ > t h e v e l o c i t y o f t h e " d i s - Temperature T [K]
l o c a t i o n f r e e " < I l l > - o r i e n t e d c r y s t a l . We n o t e FIG I b
FIG 1 T-dependence o f a t t e n u a t i o n t h a t t h e s l i g h t QSD-effect (seen on aB around
-
(fig.1a) (aB = 50 MHz
-
non-
150K) does n o t i n f l u e n c e v,(T) t o any measura- d i s l o c a t i o n background a f t e rU
b l e extend. The i n s e r t i n f i g . l b b r i n g s o u t y - i r r a d i a t i o n ) and sound ve- l o c i t y ( f i g . l b ) ( v e = V L ~ ~ ~ ,
t h e remarkable LT behaviour: Whereas f o r T + 0 measured a f t e r bac ground
v(T) e x h i b i t s a f i n i t e and even i n c r e a s i n g slope w i t h T + 0. The same v(T)-behaviour
has been observed a t a l l frequencies. Q u i t e s i m i l a r v(T) e f f e c t s have been r e p o r t e d by A l e r s and Zimmermann /5/ a t even lower T (T 2 0.3K).
-p ...
F i g.2 shows t h e (T ,f )-dependence o f t h e
d i s l o c a t i o n modulus d e f e c t ,_p --__ I [ M H Z ]
a
MD : AM/Mo = (Mo-M)/Mo = 2 ( ~ ~ - v ) / v ~ (1 )
which i s more i n f o r m a t i v e than v(T) and e a s i e r \
t o compare w i t h aD(T) ( f i g . l a ) . With decrea- s i n g T t h e MD passes through a broad maximum
I: ard thendecreases almost l i n e a r i l y down t o
4.2K. As w i t h an(T) t h e MD-maximum shows a 0 50 100 150 200 2x300
c h a r a c t e r i s t i c 7 - s h i f t from 200K a t 10 MHz t o Temperature T !K] 50K a t 70 MHz. We p o i n t o u t t h a t a t T < 50K FIG 2 T-dependence o f d i s l o c a t i o n ND(T,f) i s n o t i n f l u e n c e d by phonon-electron
-
modulus d e f e c t . e f f e c t s w i t h i n t h e present Av/vo s e n s i t i v i t y /11/ and t h e r e f o r e much b e t t e r s u i t e d f o r t h e i n v e s t i g a t i o n o f d i s l o c a t i o n e f f e c t s than t h e PEA-rnas ked aD.4 . D i s c u s s i o n . - F i g . 3 s h o w s ( u p p e r p a r t : T > IOOK lower p a r t : 1 IOOK) t h e f-dependence of our MD- and aD-data (converted i n t o decre-
ment 6)
.
\'\ \ \ \ 6 = 0.115 (a-clg) [ d B / p ]/f [MPz]',
\ \ (2) 0The (6,MD)-data a r e compared w i t h t h e theore-
,,---_____
t i c a l f-dependence o f 6 resp. MD according t o t h e GL-theory f o r an exponential L - d i s t r i - b u t i o n /7/. Our reasons f o r t h e choice o f t h e GL-frequency p r o f i l e (GLP) have been given elsewhere /g/. Here we l i k e t o remind t h a t t h e GLP i s a i n t e r l i n k e d combination ( l a r g e
c i r c l e s i n f i g . 3 ) o f t h e 6-branch ( s o l i d cur- Frequency f [MHz]
v e ) and t h e MD-branch (dashed curve) which FIG 3 Comparison of present (&,MD)- a r e t o be simultaneously compared w i t h t h e
-
data w i t h t h e GC-theory. 6 ( f ) - r e s p . MD(f)-data. As seen i n f i g . 3 ane x c e l l e n t f i t o f t h e present data i s obtained
C5-354 JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE
w i t h
R
o r i e n t a t i o n f a c t o r , G shear modulus, b Burgers v e c t o r , C l i n e t e n s i o n . F o r l a - t e r purposes we add t h e decrement f o r f << fblAX4 2
dLOW = 19.7 Q G ~ ~ B AL f / C (7
As f i g . 3 shows fMAX i n c r e a s e s w i t h d e c r e a s i n g T ( f r o m 13 MHz a t 273K t o 100 MHz a t 50K). Q u a l i t a t i v e l y s u i h a s h i f t i s p r e d i c t e d by t h e t h e o r e t i c a l /12/ B
-
T dependence a t T/QD>
0.2 (QD = 345K Debeye-T). However, i t i s t o be p o i n t e d o u t t h a t t h e " d i s l o c a t i o _ ? resonance s t r e n g t h " GMAX w h i c h i s independent o f B (equ. ( 3 ) ) decreases w i t h decrea- s i n g T. Such a GMAX(T)-behaviour p o i n t s t o a more complex T-dependence o f DR t h a n h i t h e r t o t r e a t e d by t h e t h e o r y and m o s t l y assumed f o r e v a l u a t i o n o f e x p e r i m e n t a l d a t a2
(GMAX
-
!L = c o n s t /13,14/, see however /3,15/). T h i s c r u c i a l p o i n t , t h e T-dependen- c e o f A L ~ , i s even b e t t e r demonstrated by comparing t h e measured MDLOW(T)- b e h a v i o u r w i t h t h e o r y (equ.(5).
MDLOW b e i n g independent o f B and any s t r o n g l y T-dependent2 2
q u a n t i t i e s : C(-Gb ) c a n c e l s t h e Gb -dependence i n equ. (5)): As f i g . 2 and 3 show MD W(T) decreases c o n t i n u o u s l y w i t h d e c r e a s i n g T down t o l o w e s t T. Adding A l e r s and -L 0
Zimmermann's /5/ r e s u l t s we c o n c l u d e t h a t t h e MD(T) decrease c o n t i n u o u s down t o even
0.3K. 18'
i
'1
Fig.4 shows t h e T-dependence o f t h e DR parameters w h i c h can be d e r i v e d f r o m t h e GL- t h e o r y w i t h o u t r e s o r t t o any a p r i o r i unknown
2
q u a n t i t y : AL ( d e r i v e d f r o m 6MAX and f r o m MD* equ. ( 3 ) and ( 5 ) ) , B/A ( d e r i v e d f r o m equ. (3,4)
2
resp. equ. (5,6)) and L B ( d e r i v e d f r o m equ.
( 4 ) resp. e q u . ( 6 ) ) w i t h R = 0.088, G = 10 4.08 X 10 N /m2, C = 0.55 X I O - ~ ~ N , b = 2.55 X 1 0 - ~ ~ m ( a l l v a l u e s f r o m / 1 3 / ) . Whereas t h e t e m p e r a t u r e i n f l u e n c e on G
2
and C n e a r l y c a n c e l each o t h e r f o r AL .we o 50 1 0 0 1 5 0 2 0 0 2 % 300 e v a l u a t e B L ~ w i t h C = c o n s t which r e s u l t s Temperature T {K,
i n a s m a l l e r r o r ( 5%) between 273 and FIG 4 T-dependence o f d i s l o c a t i o n
2 resonance parameters.
4.2K. As f i g . 4 shows AL decreases by 2 80%
between 273 and 4.2K. With t h e p l o t o f B / A
2
we e l i m i n a t e L ( T ) ( w h i c h c o u l d be t h e reason f o r t h e 11L b e h a v i o u r ) a t t h e c o s t o f i n t r o d u c i n g B(T). I f we would assume A = c o n s t t h e d e p i c t e d B/A-behaviour would d i - r e c t l y r e p r e s e n t t h e T-dependence o f B. The a l m o s t l i n e a r B/A-behaviour f o r T > 50K c o u l d t h e n be e x p l a i n e d by phonon s c a t t e r i n g (Bph
-
T ) b u t t h e i n c r e a s e i n B/A a t T < 30K t h e n i s i n c o n t r a d i c t i o n t o any c u r r e n t t h e o r y / l ,16/. Furthermore, B/ A de- creases by t h e f a c t o r o f 3 between 273 and 4.2K whereas f r o m t h e o r e t i c a l arguments a n o r d e r o f magnitude r e d u c t i o n o f B i s p r e d i c t e d/?/.
2
consider t h e T-dependence o f LB i n f i g . 4 , assume L = const and f i n d B
-
T down t o 50K, B = const a t T < 30K and B(273K)/B(4.2K) 2 10. Such a B(T)-behaviour i s i n com-p l e t e accordance w i t h t h e t h e o r e t i c a l p r e d i c t i o n s .
measurements. With counted l o c a l A - v a l u e s
i n t h e range (1 t o 4).10'crn-~ and B(273)/ A = 02 1 . 7 - 1 0 - ~ ~ ~ s ( f i g . 4 ) we g e t B(273K) =
2
T-dependence o f B: I n f i g . 5 we p l o t B* = ( L ' B ) ~ / ( L B)213K = B(T)/B(273K) f o r L inde- pendent o f T versus T/QD. For t h i s p l o t we have taken care o f C = C ( T ) . Since i n n o r - mal metals B i s t h e sum o f t h e phonon (Bph) and e l e c t r o n (Be) drag and s i n c e f o r T -t 0 Bph -t 0 we o b t a i n from our r e s u l t s B(T + O)/B(273K) = Be/B(273K) = 1/10 and
Be = 0.11 Bph(273K). S u b t r a c t i o n o f t h e T-independent B,-contribution (dashed d o t t e d l i n e i n f i g . 5 ) y i e l d s t h e phonon c o n t r i b u t i o n Temperature T [Hi
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 345
Bph(T)/Bph(273K) (open squares) i n good
( 4 2 2). 1 0 - ~ ~ s / r n ~ . T h i s value conf inns pre- , 4 . , , , . , . . .
0 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10
vious B-values obtained by theory and o t h e r
TIB,
agreement w i t h theory /12/. As can be seen
from f i q . 5 f o r Cu t h e approximation B/B(273K)= 'bO
-
"
experiments ( c . f . c o m p i l a t i o n given by /15/).
FIG 5 T-dependence o f t h e normalized For t h e e l e c t r o n drag c o e f f i c i e n t we o b t a i n
-
d i s l o c a t i o n drag c o e f f i c i e n t s .-3- BIB(273K)
- - - B,/B(273)0
+ (B-Be)/Bph(273K)
- - - Bp,, theorte
l
(Bra~lsford)T-dependence o f A : The reasonable values f o r ~ ( 2 7 3 K ) and B, and t h e good agreement o f B(T) w i t h phonon s c a t t e r i n g t h e o r y a p o s t e r i o r i j u s t i f y our L = const assumption.
2
This L = const i s even s t r o n g e r supported by t h e behaviour o f L B a t T < 30K ( f i g . 3 ) : Since a t these temperatures Bph << Be and thus B = Be = const i t f o l l o w s t h a t L =
const. Therefore t h e l i n e a r T-dependence o f f,~' i n t h i s temperature range can o n l y be due t o t h e 1-dependence o f A w h i c h i s a d m i t t e d l y a strange conclusion. However, recent measurements of DR i n s l i g h t l y y - i r r a d i a t e d samples u s i n g t h e SSC-technique
(SSC = sandwich s i n g l e c r y s t a l , a novel b u f f e r technique designed f o r t h e protec- t i o n o f t h e pinned d i s l o c a t i o n s a g a i n s t QSD induced break-away 1171) show t h a t any L ( T ) - e f f e c t between 4.2 and 300K must be excluded and prove t h a t A = A (T) 1181.
2
Fig.4 (curve AL w i t h L = const) d i r e c t l y shows t h a t P decreases l i n e a r l y from 150 t o 4.2K (and probably even t o lower T 151). A l i n e a r e x t r a p o l a t i o n p o i n t s t o r e s i d u - a l DR damping a t T
-.
OK. However, more work i s needed a t very low T s i n c e A l e r s and Zimmermann /5/ measured MD e f f e c t s o n l y a t a s i n g l e f. Since o f course t h e d i s l o - T/273 ( d o t t e d l i n e ) f o r T > 50K and B/B(273K)=E
l.
0.1 (dashed d o t t e d l i n e ) f o r T < 30K can be
g
09 U
used. For numerical e v a l u a t i o n o f B we need
F
08t o know e i t h e r A o r L. Since L cannot be mea-
-J 0 7
sured independent1 y o n l y t h e A
-
measurement 0 6 (e.g. by t h e e t c h - p i t technique) o f f e r s/ /
C5-356 JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE
c a t i o n d e n s i t y ( i n t h e sense o f t o t a l d i s l o c a t i o n length/cm3 ) i s T-independent we ha- v e t o c o n c l u d e t h a t t h e number o f l o o p s c o n t r i b u t i n g t o d i s l o c a t i o n resonance i s tem- p e r a t u r e dependent. Such a n e f f e c t p o i n t s towards some i n t i m a t e p r o p e r t y o f t h e d i s - l o c a t i o n s i n v o l v e d i n MHz-DR and p r o b a b l y has t o be d i s c u s s e d i n terms o f T-dependent k i n k - (and perhaps s t a c k i n g f a u l t - ) b e h a v i o u r . I t seems i m p o s s i b l e t o a t t r i b u t e t h e observed
A
( T ) t o t h e t e m p e r a t u r e dependent d e n s i t y o f t h e r m a l l y generatedk i n k
-
p a l r s , s i n c e t h i s cannot e x p l a i n e.g. A (T) a t <100K. Thus we a t t r i b u t e t h e A ( T ) be- h a v i o u r t o an u n e x p l a i n e d T - i n f l u e n c e on t h e m o t i o n o f g e o m e t r i c a l k i n k s i n Cu. Acknowledgements
.-
Our thanks a r e due t o o u r c o l 1 eagues I r e n e Z e f e r e r who c a r e f u l l y t y p e d o u r m a n u s c r i p t s , t o Fred Ramm who d i d t h e s k i l l f u l d r a w i n g and p h o t o g r a p h i c work, t o L o t h a r Kaul and K u r t D i e s i n g e r f o r g r o w i n g t h e s i n g l e c r y s t a l s and l a s t n o t l e a s t t o Ludwig C o s l e r who cooperated w i t h sample p r e p a r a t i o n and m e t a l l o g r a p h i c work. Work s u p p o r t e d by t h e DFG (SF0 125).References
/l/ A.V.Granato: Proc. 5 t h ICIFUA, Vol.11, p.33 S p r i n g e r B e r l i n 1975
/2/ V.J.Al ' s h i t s , V.L. Indenbom: "Dynamic Drag o f D i s l o c a t i o n s " , P r e p r i n t No.18, I n s t . o f C r y s t a l l o g r a p h y , Academy o f Sciences o f t h e USSR, Moscow (1974)
/3/ H.R.Kaufmann, D.Lenz, K.Liicke: Proc. 5 t h ICIFUA, Vol.11, p.177, S p r i n g e r B e r l i n 1975
/4/ J.Schulz, D.Lenz: t h i s volume
/5/ G.A.Alers, J.E.Zimmermann: Phys.Rev.
139,
414 ( 1 965)/6/ J.S.Koehler: " I m p e r f e c t i o n s i n N e a r l y P e r f e c t C r y s t a l s " , J . W i l e y New York 1952 /7/ A.V.Granato, K.Lucke: J.Appl.Phys.
27,
583 (1956)/8/ G.Hartmann, D.Lenz: t e be p u b l i s h e d /9/ D.Lenz, K.Lucke, H.Schmidt: t h i s v01 ume
/10/ P.Schrey, J.Schulz, H.Schmidt, D.Lenz: t h i s volume /11/ M.S.Steinberg: Phys. Rev.
111,
425 (1958)/12/ A . D . B r a i l s f o r d : Proc. 5 t h ICIFUA, Vol.11, p.1, S p r i n g e r B e r l i n 1975 / l 3 1 R.M.Stern, A.V.Granato: Acta Met.
10,
358 (1962)/14/ N.P.Kobelev, Ya.M.Soifer: Sov.Phys.Solid S t a t e ,
17,
989 (1975) /15/ V.K.Park, H.D.Gubermann: J.App1. Phys.2,
32 (1973)/16/ V.Ya.Kravchenko: Sov.Phys.Solid S t a t e ,