HAL Id: jpa-00224693
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/jpa-00224693
Submitted on 1 Jan 1985
HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.
L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.
THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STRUCTURE OF INTERNAL INTERFACES FOR THE PROPERTIES
OF MATERIALS
H. Gleiter
To cite this version:
H. Gleiter. THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STRUCTURE OF INTERNAL INTERFACES FOR THE PROPERTIES OF MATERIALS. Journal de Physique Colloques, 1985, 46 (C4), pp.C4-393-C4-404.
�10.1051/jphyscol:1985442�. �jpa-00224693�
JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE
Colloque C4, suppl6ment au n04, Tome 46, a v r i l 1985 page C4-393
THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STRUCTURE OF INTERNAL INTERFACES FOR THE PROPERTIES OF MATERIALS
H . Gleiter
U n i v e r s i t a t des Saar Zandes, Bau 2, 0-6600 Saarbriicken, F. R. G .
A b s t r a c t
-
The m e t h o d s a v a i l a b l e t o s t u d y t h e c o r r e l a t i o n b e t w e e n p r o p e r t i e s a n d i i f o 0 m m i E - s t r u c t u r e o f i n t e r f a c e s a r e c r i t i c a l l y a s s e s s e d b y c o n s i d e r i n g t h e i r s p e c i f i c l i m i t a t i o n s .S t u d i e s o f t h e b e h a v i o u r o f g r a i n b o u n d a r i e s by means o f t h e p l a t e / s p h e r e m e t h o d a r e r e p o F t % h T n a i T F t T K g t h a t a f e w b o u n d a r i e s e x h i b i t s p e c i a l p r o p e r t i e s w h i c h w e r e o b s e r v e d f o r a p a r t i c u l a r i n t e r f a c e i n d e p e n d e n t l y o f t h e p r o p e r t y i n v e s t i g a t e d ( e . g . e n e r g y , c o r r o s i o n , e m b r i t t l e m e n t ) . M o s t s p e c i a l b o u n d a r i e s w e r e o f h i g h c o i n c i d e n c e t y p e . B u t n o t a l l h i g h c o i n c i d e n c e b o u n d a r i e s showed s p e c i a l p r o p e r t i e s . I t seems t h e i n t e r a t o m i c i n t e r a c t i o n w h i c h s e l e c t s b e t w e e n s p e c i a l a n d " n o n - s p e c i a l " h i g h c o i n c i d e n c e b o u n d a r i e s . T h e p r o p e r t i e s o f b o u n d a r i e s d e v i a t i n g f r o m s p e c i a l m i s o r i e n t a t i o n s w e r e f o u n d t o be c o n t r o l l e d by t h e p r e s e n c e o f
( s e c o n d a r y ) b o u n d a r y d i s l o c a t i o n s .
s y s t e m a t i c s t u d i e s o f t h e p r o p e r t i e s o f i n t e r p h a s e b o u n d a r i e s b e t w e e n i o n i c c r y s t a l s a n d n o b l e m e t a l s S K o K d d - f h - a E c o i n i r d e t i c e m i s o r i e n t a t i o n s do n o t r e s u l t i n s p e c i a l b e h a v i o u r w h i c h was o b - s e r v e d o n l y i f c l o s e p a c k e d r o w s o f a t o m s a t t h e " s u r f a c e s " o f the m e t a l c r y s t a l s " l o c k e d " i n t o t h e " v a l l e y s " b e t w e e n c l o s e p a c k e d a t o m i c r o w s a t t h e " s u r f a c e s U o f t h e i o n i c c r y s t a l s ( " l o c k - i n "
m o d e l o f i n t e r p h a s e b o u n d a r i e s ) .
The b a s i c i d e a o f n a n o c r y s t a l l i n e m a t e r i a l s i s t o g e n e r a t e a new t y p e o f s o l i d s b y 5 X p T o i f f i ? ~ f f i e - h - i g l r y - d i s t o r t e d a t o m i c s t r u c t u r e e x i s t i n g i n t h e c o r e o f g r a i n ( i n t e r p h a s e ) b o u n d a r i e s . T h i s i s a c h i e v e d b y r e d u c i n g t h e c r y s t a l s i z e o f a p o l y c r y s t a l l i n e m a t e r i a l t o a few n a n o m e t e r s ( n a n o c r y s t a l l i n e m a t e r i a l ) s o t h a t t h e v o l u m e f r a c t i o n o c c u p i e d b y i n t e r f a c e s ( i n t e r f a c i a l c o m p o n e n t ) a n d c r y s t a l s a r e c o m p a r a b l e . The i n t e r f a c i a component o f s u c h a m a t e r i a l c o n s i s t s o f many ( t y p i c a l l y 1 0 1 9 c m ) b o u n d a r i e s . As t h e s t r u c t u r e s o f t h e s e b o u n d a r i e s a r e a l l d i f f e r e n t , t h e i n t e r - f a c i a l c o m p o n e n t ( i . e . t h e sum o f a l l b o u n d a r y s t r u c t u r e s ) r e s e m b l e s a f r o z e n g a s . E x p e r i m e n t a l s t u d i e s o f n a n o c r y s t a l l i n e m a t e r i a l s s u p p o r t t h i s h y p o t h e s i s a n d s u g g e s t t h a t i n t e r f a c e s may be u s e d a s a s t r u c t u r a l c o m p o n e n t f o r g e n e r a t i n g a g a s - l i k e s o l i d s t a t e s t r u c t u r e .
INTRODUCTION
The o b j e c t o f t h i s c o n t r i b u t i o n i s t o a s s e s s some a s p e c t s o f t h e c o r r e l - a t i o n b e t w e e n t h e a t o m i c s t r u c t u r e a n d t h e p r o p e r t i e s o f i n t e r f a c e s . F o r p r e v i o u s r e v i e w s we r e f e r t o t h e p a p e r by Pumphrey ( 1 ) a n d Goodhew ( 2 ) . The m a i n c o n t e n t o f t h i s p r e s e n t a t i o n was s e t f o r t h i n p a p e r s w h i c h h a v e a p p e a r e d o r w i l l a p p e a r e l s e w h e r e . H e r e a summary w i l l b e g i v e n o f t h e p o i n t s w h i c h seem m o s t p e r t i n e n t t o t h i s s y m p o s i u m .
Article published online by EDP Sciences and available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/jphyscol:1985442
C4-394 JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE
MICROSCOPIC STATISTICAL EXPERIMENTS VERSUS MACROSCOPIC BICRYSTAL MEASURE- MENTS
S t u d i e s o f t h e c o r r e l a t i o n between boundary s t r u c t u r e and p r o p e r t i e s by means of b i c r y s t a l s a r e c a r r i e d o u t by growing from t h e m e l t a s e r i e s of c r y s t a l l o g r a p h i c a l l y we1 1 c h a r a c t e r i z e d b i c r y s t a l s , t h e p r o p e r t i e s of which a r e measured ( 3 ) a s a f u n c t i o n o f t h e c r y s t a l l o g r a p h i c p a r a m e t e r s A l t h o u g h m e a s u r e m e n t s of t h i s t y p e have made o u t s t a n d i n g c o n t r i b u t i o n s t o o u r p r e s e n t u n d e r s t a n d i n g o f i n t e r f a c e s ( c . f . f o r example i n c l a s s i c a l p a p e r s by A u s t e t a l . ( 4 ) , ( 5 ) ) , t h e method s u f f e r s p r i m a r i l y from t h r e e d i s a d v a n t a g e s . Growth from t h e m e l t i s g e n e r a l l y n o t a p p l i c a b l e t o i n t e r - p h a s e b o u n d a r i e s . As a c o n s e q u e n c e o f t h e s u b s t r u c t u r e p r e s e n t i n t h e c r y s t a l s , a n y b o u n d a r y o f m a c r o s c o p i c d i m e n s i o n s r e p r e s e n t s a m i x t u r e of d i f f e r e n t boundary s t r u c t u r e s . Hence, t h e p r o p e r t i e s m e a s u r e d by u s i n g m a c r o s c o p i c b o u n d a r i e s a r e i n r e a l i t y a v e r a g e v a l u e s . The t i m e consuming g r o w t h p r o c e d u r e of a b i c r y s t a l l i m i t s t h e number o f m e a s u r e m e n t s a n d , t h e r e f o r e , r e d u c e s t h e s t a t i s t i c a l c o n f i d e n c e of t h e p r o p e r t y - s t r u c t u r e c o r r e l a t i o n d e r i v e d . For t h e same r e a s o n , p r a c t i c a l l y a 1 1 m e a s u r e m e n t s a r e biased i n t h e s e n s e t h a t o n l y s p e c i f i c ( e . g . [110] t i l t ) b o u n d a r i e s have been i n v e s t i g a t e d by t h e b i c r y s t a l method. As t h e s e l e c t i o n ofi t h e s e b o u n d a r i e s i s g u i d e d by a s t r u c t u r a l m o d e l , t h e d a n g e r o f c o n f i r m i n g p r e - c o n c e i v e d i d e a s of t h e b o u n d a r y s t r u c t u r e i s n o t u n l i k e l y . I n o r d e r t o remove t h e s e d i s a d v a n t a g e s , a s t a t i s t i c a l method h a s been p r o p o s e d (6), ( 7 ) . A l a r j e number ( 1 0 4
. . .
1 0 7 ) o f g r a i n b o u n d a r i e s i s g e n e r a t e d by s i n t e r i n g 1 0...
10 randomly o r i e n t e d s p h e r e s o f t h e same s i z e ( 0 . 5.. .
10QVm) o n t o a s i n g l e c r y s t a l p l a t e ( F i g s . 1 and 2 a ) . During s i n t e r - i n g , n e c k s a r e formed between t h e s p h e r e s and t h e p l a t e . Each neck c o n - t a i n s a g r a i n b o u n d a r y t h e s t r u c t u r e o f which i s d e t e r m i n e d by t h e o r i e n t a t i o n r e l a t i o n s h i p between t h e p l a t e and t h e s p h e r e ( F i g . 1 ) . Hence, e v e r y s p e c i m e n c o n t a i n s l o 4.. .
107 b o u n d a r i e s o f d i f f e r e n t s t r u c t u r e s ( F i g . 2 a ) . As t h e s m a l l s p h e r e s a r e f r e e o f s u b s t r u c t u r e , t h e s t r u c t u r e o f e v e r y b o u n d a r y r e m a i n s c o n s t a n t o v e r t h e e n t i r e a r e a o f t h e neck") a n d , h e n c e , t h e two d r a w b a c k s o f t h e b i c r y s t a l method m e n t i o n e d a b o v e ( p o o r s t a t i s t i c s , v a r y i n g boundary s t r u c t u r e ) a r e a v o i d e d .Two f u r t h e r a d v a n t a g e s of t h e p l a t e / s p h e r e method a r e t h a t g r a i n bound- a r i e s a s w e l l a s i n t e r p h a s e b o u n d a r i e s may be g e n e r a t e d ( 7 ) and t h a t a l l b o u n d a r i e s a r e t e s t e d s i m u l t a n e o u s l y u n d e r i d e n t i c a l c o n d i t i o n s . C l e a r - ly t h e p l a t e / s p h e r e method i s l i m i t e d t o s y s t e m s t h a t c a n be s i n t e r e d . GRAIN B O U N D A R Y STUDIES
The p l a t e l s p h e r e method h a s been a p p l i e d s o f a r t o s t u d y t h e c o r r e l a t - i o n s between b o u n d a r y s t r u c t u r e and b o u n d a r y e n e r g y (6), ( 8 ) c o r r o s i v i t y (9), embri t t l ement ( l o ) , mobi 1 i t y ( 1 1 ) , p r e s s u r e ( 1 2 ) and t e m p e r a t u r e ( 1 3 ) . The e f f e c t o f t h e a t o m i c s t r u c t u r e on t h e e n e r g y o f a b o u n d a r y was i n v e s t i g a t e d by a n n e a l i n g t h e s p e c i m e n s a t e l e v a t e d t e m p e r a t u r e s . I n o r d e r t o m i n i m i z e t h e f r e e e n e r g y o f t h e s y s t e m , t h e s p h e r e s r o t a t e ( b y a d i f f u s i o n a l a n d / o r g r a i n boundary s l i d i n g p r o c e s s ) i n t o s u c h o r i e n t - a t i o n s which r e s u l t i n b o u n d a r i e s o f minimum e n e r g y ( 1 4 ) ( F i g . 1 ) . Hence, i n a s i n g l e e x p e r i m e n t a l l low e n e r g y b o u n d a r i e s c a n be i d e n t i f - i e d by m e a s u r i n g ( e . g . by means o f a s t a n d a r d X-ray method) t h e o r i e n t - a t i o n s o f t h e s p h e r e s a f t e r l o n g s i n t e r i n g t i m e s . I f t h e p l a t e / s p h e r e method i s s l i g h t l y m o d i f i e d , o t h e r p r o p e r t i e s , s u c h a s b o u n d a r y em- b r i t t l e m e n t , m o b i l i t y o r c o r r o s i v i t y may be i n v e s t i g a t e d and c o r r e l a t e d w i t h t h e boundary s t r u c t u r e . F o r example, b o u n d a r y c o r r o s i o n was s t u d -
* ) S t r u c t u r a l v a r i a t i o n s d u e t o d i f f e r e n t r i g i d body t r a n s l a t i o n s ( 3 1 ) i n d i f f e r e n t a r e a s o f t h e boundary ( 3 2 ) c a n n o t be r u l e d o u t . However, a f t e r l o n g a n n e a l i n g t i m e s , t h e boundary p r o b a b l y a p p r o a c h e s t h e t r a n s - l a t i o n c o r r e s p o n d i n g t h e minimum f r e e e n e r g y . '
i e d by i m m e r s i n g a s p h e r e / p l a t e s p e c i m e n ( F i g . 2 b ) w i t h r a n d o m l y
o r i e n t e d s p h e r e s i n t o a c h e m i c a l s o l u t i o n c a u s i n g g r a i n b o u n d a r y c o r r o s - i o n .
F i g . 1 F i g . 2
F i g . 1: Formation of a g r a i n boundary (AB) d u r i n g s i n t e r i n g o f a s i n g l e c r y s t a l sphere -to a s i n g l e c r y s t a l p l a t e (p). The c r y s t a l l a t t i c e o f b i s t i l t e d 0O w i t h r e s p e c t t o p.A r o t a t i o n o f b may be achieved f o r example by a d i f f u s i v e f l u x o f atoms removing a wedge shaped p i e c e o f m a t e r i a l from t h e l e f t p a r t and i n s e r t i n g i t a t t h e r i g h t p a r t o f t h e boundary.
F i g . 2: Schematic diagram o f t h e specimens used f o r t h e i n v e s t i g a t i o n o f g r a i n bound- a r y p r o p e r t i e s by t h e plate/sphere method (a). b shows t h e process o f removing i n d i v i d - u a l spheres by boundary corrosion.
As t h e c o r r o s i o n p r o c e s s o c c u r s u n d e r i d e n t i c a l c o n d i t i o n s a t a l l b o u n d - a r i e s . ~ i m u l t a n e o ~ s l y , t h e b o u n d a r i e s w i t h h i g h e s t c o r r o s i o n r a t e s w i l l be c o r r o d e d t h r o u g h f i r s t a n d , h e n c e , t h e c o r r e s p o n d i n g s p h e r e s f a l l o f f f i r s t . Then, t h e s p h e r e s ( b o u n d a r i e s ) w i t h t h e n e x t h i g h e r c o r r o s i o n r a t e f o l l o w a n d so o n . I n o t h e r w o r d s , i f o n e m e a s u r e s t h e o r i e n t a t i o n o f t h e s p h e r e s t h a t f a l l o f f f i r s t ( l a s t ) , o n e knows t h e b o u n d a r i e s o f maximum ( m i n i m u m ) c o r r o s i o n r a t e . The e n t i r e b o u n d a r y c o r r o s i o n s p e c t r u m may be o b t a i n e d i n t h e same way i f t h e o r i e n t a t i o n o f t h e s p h e r e s
f a l l i n g o f f i s m o n i t o r e d a s a f u n c t i o n o f t h e c o r r o s i o n t i m e . I n a s i m i l a r f a s h i o n t h e b o u n d a r y e m b r i t t l e m e n t ( 1 0 ) a n d b o u n d a r y m o b i l i t y ( 1 1 ) a s a f u n c t i o n o f b o u n d a r y s t r u c t u r e was m e a s u r e d . I n t h e s e s t u d i e s ( l o ) , ( 1 1 ) t h e s p e c i m e n s w e r e v i b r a t e d t o b r e a k t h e s p h e r e s o f f o r a n n e a l e d t o i n d u c e i n t e r f a c e m i g r a t i o n . The r e s u l t s o b t a i n e d may b e s u m m a r i z e d a s f o l l o w s . ( i ) A c o r r e l a t i o n b e t w e e n b o u n d a r y s t r u c t u r e a n d p r o p e r t i e s e x i s t s . The o r i e n t a t i o n r e l a t i o n s h i p s f o r w h i c h b o u n d a r i e s w i t h s p e c i a l p r o p e r t i e s ( l o w e n e r g y , c o r r o s i v i t y a n d e m b r i t t l e m e n t ) w e r e o b s e r v e d , w e r e t h e same a n d d i d n o t d e p e n d o n t h e p r o p e r t y s t u d i e d . ( i i ) M o s t ( b u t n o t a l l ) s p e c i a l b o u n d a r i e s w e r e o f t h e h i g h c o i n c i d e n c e ( o r s h o r t p e r i o d i c i t y ) t y p e . T h i s r e s u l t i s c o n s i s t e n t w i t h t h e f i n d i n g s o b t a i n e d f r o m b i c r y s t a l e x p e r i m e n t s ( 1 8 ) - ( 2 1 ) . H o w e v e r , t h e p l a t e / s o h e r e e x p e r i m e n t s showed t h a t n o t a l l c o i n c i d e n c e ( s h o r t p e r i o d i c ) b o u n d a r i e s e x h i b i t e d s p e c i a l p r o p e r t i e s . I n f a c t , t h e s e l e c t i o n b e t w e e n h i q h c o i n c i d e n c e b o u n d a r i e s w i t h a n d w i t h o u t s p e c i a l p r o p e r t i e s s e e m s t o d e p e n d o n t h e i n t e r a t o m i c i n t e r a c t i o n ( T a b l e I ) a s c o m p o s i t i o n a l c h a n g e s v a r y t h e o r i e n t a t i o n r e l a t i o n s h i p s f o r w h i c h s p e c i a l b o u n d a r i e s a r e o b - s e r v e d . P a r a l l e l i t y o f c l o s e p a c k e d d i r e c t i o n s ( p l a n e s ) a p p a r e n t l y f a v o u r s s p e c i a l p r o p e r t i e s (19);(cf. p o s t e r A3 o f t h i s s y m p o s i u m a n d a l s o t h e " l o c k - i n " m o d e l o f t h e s u b s e q u e n t s e c t i o n ) .
C4-396 JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE
T a b l e I: C o m p a r i s o n o f some s p e c i a l b o u n d a r i e s i n d i f f e r e n t m a t e r i a l s ( 8 )
t c o i n c .
I
P l a t e s u r f a c e { 1 1 0 )1
( i i i ) The p r o p e r t i e s o f b o u n d a r i e s d e v i a t i n g f r o m t h e s e s p e c i a l o r i e n t - a t i o n r e l a t i o n s h i p s a r e d e t e r m i n e d b y d e f e c t s i n t h e b o u n d a r y s t r u c t u r e . F o r e x a m p l e , b o u n d a r y c o r r o s i o n (9) was o b s e r v e d t o i n i t i a t e a n d p r o - c e e d a l o n g ( s e c o n d a r y ) b o u n d a r y d i s l o c a t i o n s . I f t h e s e c o r r o s i o n c h a n n e l s o v e r l a p , t h e b o u n d a r y e x h i b i t e d h i g h c o r r o s i v i t y . A s i m i l a r m e c h a n i s m was f o u n d t o c o n t r o l t h e e m b r i t t l e m e n t o f g r a i n b o u n d a r i e s
( 1 0 ) . I n t h e v i c i n i t y o f t h e ( s e c o n d a r y ) b o u n d a r y d i s l o c a t i o n s a c l o u d o f s o l u t e a t o m s ( 1 7 ) i s f o r m e d w h i c h e m b r i t t l e s t h e b o u n d a r y l o c a l l y . H i t h i n c r e a s i n g d e v i a t i o n f r o m a s p e c i a l o r i e n t a t i o n r e l a t i o n s h i p t h e s p a c i n g b e t w e e n t h e s e c l o u d s ( a n d , h e n c e , t h e s p a c i n g b e t w e e n t h e em-
b r i t t l e d a r e a s ) d e c r e a s e s s o t h a t t h e b o u n d a r i e s become m o r e a n d m o r e b r i t t l e . . O b s e r v a t i o n s o f t h i s k i n d w o u l d h a v e b e e n d i f f i c u l t b y u s i n g t h e b i c r y s t a l metho! b e c a u s e a n a c c u r a c y o f t h e o r i e n t a t i o n r e l a t i o n - s h i p o f l e s s t h a n 1 i s r e q u i r e d a n d t h e p r o w t h o f p r e l i m i n a r y u n - known n o n - c o i n c i d e n c e b o u n d a r i e s o f l o w e n e r g y , c o r r o s i v i t y a n d em- b r i t t l e m e n t w o u l d h a v e b e e n n e c e s s a r y .
3 9 11 17b 33
INTERPHASE BOUNDARY STUDIES
The u n d e r s t a n d i n g b e t w e e n a t o m i c s t r u c t u r e a n d p r o p e r t i e s o f i n t e r - p h a s e b o u n d a r i e s i s l e s s d e v e l o p e d t h a n f o r g r a i n b o u n d a r i e s ( 2 2 ) . p r o b a b l y , t h e v a r i o u s t y p e s o f i n t e r p h a s e b o u n d a r i e s w i 1 1 b e h a v e d i f f
-
e r e n t l y d e p e n d i n g o n t h e c h e m i c a l b o n d i n g a n d p h y s i c a l p r o p e r t i e s o f t h e c r y s t a l s i n v o l v e d , s u c h a s p o l a r i z a b i l i t y , c o n d u c t i v i t y , m o l e c u l a r w e i g h t e t c . T h i s makes i t d i f f i c u l t t o c o m p a r e t h e r e s u l t s o b t a i n e d f o r d i f f e r e n t t y p e s o f i n t e r p h a s e s . A f i r s t s y s t e m a t i c s t u d y h a s b e e n c a r r i e d o u t ( 2 3 ) o f t h e c o r r e l a t i o n b e t w e e n b o u n d a r y e n e r g y a n d a t o m i c s t r u c t u r e o f i n t e r p h a s e b o u n d a r i e s f o r m e d b y n o b l e m e t a l s (Au, Ag, Cu) and a v a r i e t y o f i o n i c c r y s t a l s ( L i F , KC1, NaC1, Ng0, A1203, m i c a ) . T h e b o u n d a r i e s w e r e g e n e r a t e d b y t h e p l a t e / s p h e r e m e t h o d u s i n g a b o u t 1 0 7 s p h e r e s w i t h d i a m e t e r s o f 0 . 5 t o 1 urn. T h e r e s u l t s o b t a i n e d l e d t o t h e
f o l l o w i n g c o r r e l a t i o n s b e t w e e n t h e b o u n d a r y s t r u c t u r e a n d p r o p e r t i e s ( ( 2 3 ) , p o s t e r A9 o f t h i s s y m p o s i u m ) . ( i ) I n t e r p h a s e b o u n d a r y m o d e l s b a s e d o n t h e c o i n c i d e n c e c o n c e p t a r e n o t a p p l i c a b l e - t o i n t e r f a c e s b e t - ween n o b l e m e t a l s a n d i o n i c c r y s t a l s b e c a u s e t h e l o w e n e r g y b o u n d a r i e s o b s e r v e d w e r e n o t o f t h e c o i n c i d e n c e t y p e a n d c o n c e i v a b l e c o i n c i d e n c e r e l a t i o n s h i p s d i d n o t r e s u l t i n l o w e n e r g y b o u n d a r i e s . F o r e x a m p l e , F i g . 3 shows t g e s c h e m a t i c c r o s s s e c t i o n t h r o u g h a c = 11 c o i n c i d e n c e b o u n d a r y ( 5 0 . 5 r o t a t i o n a b o u t
[lla
) b e t w e e n Au a n d L i F w h i c h was n o t o b s e r v e d t o be l o w e n e r g y , w h e r e a s t h e n e a r b y non - c o i n c i d e n c e b o u n d a r y( ~ 4 . 7 ~ [110] r o t a t i o n ) e x h i b i t e d l o w e n e r g y ( F i g , 4 ) .
+
+
i+
i ++
+ + + -
-+
+ + + +
--
- + + -
-+
+ -
i - -+ I3 s p e c i a l p r o p e r t i e s (low energy) observed L i o t observeu-.
F i g . 3 F i g . 4
Fig. 3: Schematic cross s e c t i o n through a c = 11 coincidence boundary between Au and LiF. The c i r c l e s shown represent t h e atoms and s c a l e w i t h t h e Gold schmidt r a d i i o f t h e i o n s and atoms o f b o t h m a t e r i a l s . The atoms ( i o n s ) a t coincidence s i t e s a r e i n d i c a t e d i n black. This boundary was n o t observed t o be o f l o w energy F i g . 4: Schematic cross s e c t i o n through t h e low energy boundary between Au and L i F n e x t t o t h e c = 11 i n t e r f a c e ( F i g . 3). The o r i e n t a t i o n r g l a t i o n s h i p observed (54.7'
[I101 ) r e s u l t s i n p a r a l l e l i t y o f c l o s e packed planes ((111)
11
(001) . ) and c l o s e packed d i r e c t i o n s [ l l O ] A u11
[I101 LiF. However, thisAYow energyL&undary i s n o t a h i a h coincidence i n t e r f a c e . For c l a r i t y , a l l boundary atoms between the" l o c k - i n " rows o f the Au c r y s t a l a r e removed.
( i i ) A l l l o w e n e r g y b o u n d a r i e s o b s e r v e d e x p e r i m e n t a l l y may b e d e s c r i b e d b y means o f t h e f o l l o w i n g a t o m i c s t r u c t u r e ( l o c k - i n m o d e l ) . A l o w e n e r g y i n t e r p h a s e b o u n d a r y r e s u l t s , i f c l o s e p a c k e d r o w s o f a t o m s a t t h e " s u r f a c e " o f t h e m e t a l c r y s t a l f i t i n t o t h e l ' v a l l e y s " b e t w e e n t h e c l o s e p a c k e d r o w s o f a t o m s a t t h e s u r f a c e o f t h e i o n i c c r y s t a l .
E x a m p l e s o f t h i s t y p e o f b o u n d a r y s t r u c t u r e a r e shown i n F i g s . 4,5,6
F i g . 5 F i g . 6
F i g . 5: "Lock-in" s t r u c t u r e o f one o f t h e low energy boundaries observed between
Au L i F . Adjacent c l o s e packed rows o f g o l d atoms l o c k i n t o adjacent " v a l l e y s "
between c l o s e packed rows a t t h e (001) "surface" o f LiF. The boundary i s n o t a c o i n - cidence boundary.
F i g . 6 "Lock-in" s t r u c t u r e o f a l o w energy A U L i F i n t e r f a c e .
C4-398 JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE
T h i s s t r u c t u r a l model n o t o n l y e x p l a i n s ( 2 3 ) t h e e x p e r i m e n t a l l y o b s e r v - ed o r i e n t a t i o n d e p e n d e n c e of t h e boundary e n e r g y b u t a l s o t h e v a r i a t - i o n o f t h e b o u n d a r y e n e r g y a s a f u n c t i o n o f t h e b o u n d a r y i n c l i n a t i o n , t h e l a t t i c e mismatch between t h e two p h a s e s which was v a r i e d i n t h e s e e x p e r i m e n t s from a b o u t 1 % t o 35 %. I t may be of i n t e r e s t t o p o i n t o u t a c o n c e i v a b l e c o r r e l a t i o n between t h e s e r e s u l t s and t h e o b s e r v a t i o n s m e n t i o n e d i n t h e p r e v i o u s p a r a g r a p h . The l o c k - i n s t r u c t u r e r e s u l t s i n p a r a l l e l i t y of c l o s e packed d i r e c t i o n s and @ l a n e s i n b o t h c r y s t a l s ( c f . F i g s . 3 , 4 , 5 and 6 ) . A s i m i l a r p r e f e r e n c e f o r p a r a l l e l i t y of c l o s e p a c k - ed d i r e c t i o n s and p l a n e s was a l s o n o t i c e d i n s p e c i a l g r a i n b o u n d a r i e s ( c f . T a b l e I ) .
NAMOCRYSTALLINE MATERIALS
I f t h e c r y s t a l s i z e o f a p o l y c r y s t a l i s r e d u c e d t o a few n a n o m e t e r s , t h e volume f r a c t i o n o c c u p i e d by t h e i n t e r f a c e s becomes c o m p a r a b l e t o t h e volume f r a c t i o n o f t h e c r y s t a l s . I n o t h e r w o r d s , i n m a t e r i a l s o f t h i s t y p e ( c a l l e d n a n o c r y s t a l l i n e m a t e r i a l s ) , t h e i n t e r f a c e s may no l o n g e r be r e g a r d e d a s p e r t u r b a t i o n s o f t h e c r y s t a l l i n e s t r u c t u r e . The sum o f a l l i n t e r f a c e s ( c a l l e d t h e " i n t e r f a c i a l c o m p o n e n t " ) r e p r e s e n t s a p a r t of t h e m i c r o s t r u c t u r e j u s t l i k e t h e o t h e r more c o n v e n t i o n a l s t r u c t u r a l c o m p o n e n t s , s u c h a s p r e c i p i t a t e s , g r a i n s o f a s e c o n d p h a s e e t c . ( 2 4 ) . One of t h e a t t r a c t i v e f e a t u r e s of s u c h n a n o c r y s t a l l i n e m a t - e r i a l s may be t h a t t h e y p r o v i d e a means o f g e n e r a t i n g s o l i d s h a v i n g an a t o m i c s t r u c t u r e w i t h n e g l i g i b l e s h o r t and l o n g r a n g e o r d e r , i . e . t h e s t r u c t u r e of a f r o z e n g a s ( 2 5 ) , ( 2 6 ) . I f t h i s were s o , n a n o c r y s t - a l l i n e m a t e r i a l s would r e p r e s e n t a s o l i d s t a t e s t r u c t u r e d i f f e r e n t from t h e two known s o l i d s t a t e s ( c r y s t a l l i n e and g l a s s y s t a t e ) t o o n e o f which a l l m a t e r i a l s p r e s e n t l y a v a i l a b l e b e l o n g . The r e a s o n f o r t h e f o r m a t i o n o f a f r o z e n - g a s - l i k e s t r u c t u r e i n n a n o c r y s t a l l i n e s u b s t a n c e s may be r a t i o n a l i z e d a s f o l l o w s . I n m e t a l s , and p r e - sumably a l s o i n many i o n i c and c o v a l e n t l y bonded m a t e r i a l s , g r a i n b o u n d a r i e s a r e p r o b a b l y t w o - d i m e n s i o n a l p e r i o d i c s t r u c t u r e s t h e p e r i o d i c i t y o f which a n d , h e n c e , t h e p o s i t i o n a l c o r r e l a t i o n f u n c t i o n o f t h e i n t e r f a c i a l atoms d e p e n d s on t h e o r i e n t a t i o n r e l a t i o n s h i p b e t - ween a d j a c e n t c r y s t a l s . Hence, i f a p o l y c r y s t a l c o n t a i n s many bound- a r i e s , and i f t h e o r i e n t a t i o n r e l a t i o n s h i p f o r e v e r y boundary i s d i f f - e r e n t , i t c o m p r i s e s many d i f f e r e n t boundary s t r u c t u r e s . F o r e x a m p l e ,
i f we c o n s i d e r a n a n o c r y s t a l l i n e m a t e r i a l of c r y s t a l l o g r a p h i c a l l y
F i g . 7 : S c h e m a t i c s t r u c t u r e o f a n a n o c r y s t a l l i n e m a t e r i a l . For s i m - p l i c i t y , t h e b o u n d a r y ( c r y s t a l ) r e g i o n s a r e i n d i c a t e d by b r o k e n l i n e s . The b o u n d a r y atoms a r e marked i n b l a c k f o r c l a r i t y . T h i s d o e s n o t im- p l y t h a t t h e y a r e c h e m i c a l l y d i f f e r e n t from t h e atoms i n t h e c r y s t a l s .
randomly o r i e n t e d c r y s t a l l i t e s ( t h e d i a m e t e r i s a sumed t o be 5 nm, t h e i n t e r f a c i a l t h i c k n e s s 1 m ) i t c o n t a i n s a b o u t i n t e r f a c e s p e r cm3 which occupy a volume f r a c t i o n o f r o u g h l y 40 % ( F i g . 7 ) . As t h e o r i e n t - a t i o n r e l a t i o n s h i ( a n d , t h e r e f o r e , t h e boundary s t r u c t u r e ) a r e d i f f e r e n t ( a n d u n c o r r e l a t e d ! f o r e v e r y i n t e r f a c e due t o t h e random t e x t u r e , t h e i n t e r f a c i a l component o f g t h e n a n o c r y s t a l l i n e m a t e r i a l c o n s i d e r e d i s t h e sum of many ( r o u g h l y 1 0 ) d i f f e r e n t and u n c o r r e l a t e d boundary s t r u c t - u r e s . The a v e r a g e o v e r s o many u n c o r r e l a t e d s t r u c t u r e s i s u n l i k e l y t o e x h i b i t a n y s i g n i f i c a n t s h o r t o r l o n g r a n g e o r d e r , i . e . t h e a t o m i c a r r a n g e m e n t may be c o m p a r a b l e t o t h a t o f a f r o z e n g a s . I n t h e c a s e of a g a s , i t i s t h e e n t r o p y which f o r c e s t h e s y s t e m s t o form a l a r g e number of a t o m i c c o n f i g u r a t i o n s ; i n t h e c a s e o f a n a n o c r y s t a l l i n e m a t e r i a l , i t i s t h e boundary c o n d i t i o n s ( v a r y i n g from i n t e r f a c e t o i n t e r f a c e ) which f o r c e t h e atoms i n a n y i n t e r f a c e t o form d i f f e r e n t a t o m i c a r r a n g e - ments. The r e s u l t s of s t r u c t u r a l s t u d i e s by X-ray d i f f r a c t i o n , t r a n s - m i s s i o n e l e c t r o n m i c r o s c o p y and Mossbauer s p e c t r o s c o p y seem t o s u p p o r t t h e i d e a t h a t t h e i n t e r f a c i a l component o f a n a n o c r y s t a l l i n e m a t e r i a l has a s t r u c t u r e w i t h l i t t l e s h o r t o r l o n g r a n g e o r d e r .
L 0 L 8
VELOCITY [mrnlsl
F i g . 9
Fig. 8: X-ray d i f f r a c t i o n curve ( l i n e C) of t h e i n t e r f a c i a l component of nano- c r y s t a l l i n e iron with a crystal s i z e of about 6 nm. The l i n e D represents the e l a s t i c X-ray d i f f r a c t i o n of a gas of iron atoms with the same density a s t h e mat- e r i a l of curve C. E i s the measured d i f f r a c t i o n i n t e n s i t y of the iron g l a s s FegO P13C7 (27) which i s similar t o t h a t of molten iron (28).
Fig. 9: ITijssbauer spectrum of the i n t e r f a c i a l (A) and c r y s t a l l i n e component (B) of t h e m e nanocrystalline iron a s in Fig. 8.
For e x a m p l e , F i g s . 8 and 9 show t h e Mossbauer s p e c t r u m and t h e X-ray s c a t t e r i n g c u r v e o f t h e i n t e r f a c i a l component o f 6 nm n a n o c r y s t a l l i n e i r o n . I t may be s e e n ( F i g . 8 ) t h a t p r a c t i c a l l y no i n t e r f e r e n c e e f f e c t s d u e t o s h o r t r a n g e o r d e r a r e n r e s e n t s o t h a t a f r o z e n g a s - l i k e s t r u c t - u r e i s s u g g e s t e d . Measurements o f p r o p e r t i e s t h a t a r e s e n s i t i v e t o s h o r t r a n g e o r d e r ( e . g . s a t u r a t i o n m a g n e t i z a t i o n o f 3d f e r r o m a g n e t s , s p e c i f i c h e a t and p o s i t r o n a n n i h i l a t i o n ) s u g g e s t t h e a t o m i c a r r a n g e - ment i n n a n o c r y s t a l l i n e m a t e r i a l s t o be d i f f e r e n t from g l a s s e s and
r y s t a l s . T h i s r e s u l t a o r e e s w i t h . t h e s t r u c t u r a l . i n v e s t i g a t i o n s
f ~g s . 8 and 9 ) mntioned;For l e x a m p l e , t h e saturation m a g n e t ~ r a t l o n of a - i r o n which d i f f e r s by o n l y a few p e r c e n t between t h e c r y s t a l l i n e and t h e g l a s s y s t a t e ( 2 9 ) but i t chanaes by a factor ~2 i f one goes from t h e c r y s t a l 1 i n e t o t h e n a n o c r y s t a l l i n e s t a t e ( 2 5 The p r o p o s e d i n t e r - p r e t a t i o n o f t h e e f f e c t s r e p o r t e d i n t e r m s o i ' t h e numerous a t o m l c s t r u c t u r e s p r e s e n t i n t h e i n t e r f a c e s i s s u p p o r t e d by t h e f o l l o w i n g two o b s e r v a t i o n s . A n n e a l i n g o f n a n o c r y s t a l l i n e m a t e r i a l s a t e l e v a t e d t e m p e r a t u r e s c o n v e r t s them back i n t o c o n v e n t i o n a l i r o n a s soon a s
C4-400 JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE
t h e b o u n d a r i e s a r e r e m o v e d b y g r a i n g r o w t h . M e a s u r e m e n t s o n i s o l a t e d 6 nm i r o n c r y s t a l s o u t o f w h i c h t h e n a n o c r y s t a l l i n e m a t e r i a l s w e r e p r o - d u c e d ( c f . n e x t p a r a g r a p h ) d i d n o t r e v e a l a n y o f t h e s e e f f e c t s . I n f a c t , a l l e f f e c t s w e r e o n l y s e e n when a h i g h d e n s i t y o f g r a i n b o u n d - a r i e s was p r e s e n t .
F o r c o n v e n i e n c e , t h e n a n o c r y s t a l l i n e m a t e r i a l s w e r e g e n e r a t e d b y a mod- i f i e d m e t h o d o f p o w d e r m e t a l l u r g y . The s u b s t a n c e , ( e . g . Fe)was e v a p o r a t - ed i n a n i n e r t ( H e ) a t m o s p h e r e ( p r e s s u r e 1
-
2 k P a ) . The e v a p o r a t e d m a t e r i a l l o o s e s i t s t h e r m a l e n e r g y t o t h e He a n d c o n d e n s e s i n t h e f o r m o f s m a l l ( 1 - 1 0 nm) c r y s t a l s ( 3 0 ) . T h e s e c r y s t a l s w e r e a c c u m u l a t e d and, s u b s e q u e n t l y , c o m p a c t e d m e c h a n i c a l l y ( * 7 0 !!Pa p r e s s u r e ) i n t o n a n o c r y s t a l l i n e s o l i d s . T h i s m e t h o d was s e l e c t e d among o t h e r c o n c e i v - a b l e p r o c e d u r e s f o r t h e f o l l o w i n g r e a s o n s . The s i z e o f t h e c r y s t a l s c a n e a s i l y be m a n i p u l a t e d b y means o f t h e e v a p o r a t i o n r a t e a n d / o r t h e He p r e s s u r e , t h e r e s u l t i n g t e x t u r e i s random,and t h e c o n c e n t r a t i o n o f t h e i m p u r i t i e s p i c k e d - u p d u r i n g p r e p a r a t i o n i s i n t h e o r d e r o f l o m 3 .C ! e a r l y , n a n o c r y s t a l l i n e s o l i d s a r e n o t r e s t r i c t e d t o p u r e e l e m e n t s . S ~ m u l t a n e o u s o r c o n s e c u t i v e e v a p o r a t i o n o f s e v e r a l c o m p o n e n t s l e a d t o m u l t i p h a s e m a t e r i a l s . One o f t h e a t t r a c t i v e f e a t u r e s o f m u l t i - p h a s e n a n o c r y s t a l l i n e m a t e r i a l s ( n a n o c r y s t a l l i n e " a l l o y s " ) i s t h a t o n e i s n o t l i m i t e d b y m i s c i b i l i t y o f t h e c o m p o n e n t s i n t h e l i q u i d s t a t e
a s i n t h e c a s e o f m e l t s p i n n i n g , f o r e x a m p l e
.
A c c o r d i n g t o p r e l i m i n a r y t e s t s , n a n o c r y s t a l l i n e a l l o y s c a n be g e n e r a t e d i r r e s p e c t i v e o f t h e t y p e o f c h e m i c a l b o n d i n g , c r y s t a l s t r u c t u r e , m o l e c u l a r w e i g h t , e t c .References
P.H. Pumphrey: i n Grain Boundary S t r u c t u r e and P r o p e r t i e s (E.A. Chadwick and D.A.Smith, eds.) Academic Press, 1976, N.Y., p. 139.
D.J. Goodhew, i n Grain Boundary S t r u c t u r e and K i n e t i c s (R.W.Salluffi, ed.) American Soc. f o r Metals, 1980, Metals Park, Ohio, p. 155.
K.T. Aust and B. Chalmers, Proc.Roy.Soc. - 204, 359 (1950) K.T. Aust and J.W. R u t t e r , Trans AIME 215, 820 (1959) -
J.W. R u t t e r and K.T. Aust, Acta Met. 13, 181 (1965) -
G. Herrmann, H. G l e i t e r and G. Baro, Acta M e t a l l . 24, 353 (1976) -
U. Erb, W. Abel and H. G l e i t e r , S c r i p t a M e t a l l . 16, 1357 (1982) -
H. Sautter, H. G l e i t e r and G. Baro, Acta M e t a l l . 25, 467 (1977) -
U. Erb, H. G l e i t e r and G. Schwitzgebel, Acta M e t a l l . 30, 1377 (1982) - A. Roy, U. Erb and H. G l e i t e r , Acta M e t a l l . - 30, 1847 (1982)
R. W i r t h and H. G l e i t e r , Acta M e t a l l . 29, 1825 (1981) -
H. Meiser and H. G l e i t e r , S c r i p t a M e t a l l . 14, 95 (1980) -
U. Erb and H. G l e i t e r , S c r i p t a M e t a l l . - 13, 61 (1971)
P. Shewmon, i n Recryst. Grain Growth and Textures, American S o c i e t y f o r Metals, Metals Park, Ohio, 1966, p. 165
H. Mykura, i n Grain Boundary S t r u c t u r e and K i n e t i c s , (R.W. B a l l u f f i , ed.) American S o c i e t y f o r Metals, Metals Park, Ohio, 1980, p. 445
R. Mauerer, Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. o f Saarbruecken, 1984
A.H. C o t t r e l l and M.A. Jaswon, Proc.Roy.Soc. A 199, 104 (1949)
T. Watanabe, S. S h i m and S. Karashima, L i q u i d and S o l i d Metal Embrittlement, American Soc. f o r Metals, Metals Park, Ohio, 1983, i n press
(19) T. Watanabe, Phil .Mag., i n p r e s s
(20) O.P. Arora and M. FJetzger, Trans AIME 236, 1205 (1966) -
(21) J.Y. Boos and C. Goux, C.R. Acad.Sci., P a r i s , - 271, 978 (1970)
(22) H. G l e i t e r , i n Physical Metallurgy (R.W. Cahn and P. Haasen, eds.) E l s e v i e r Science Publ., 1983, p. 650
(23) H.J. Fecht and H. G l e i t e r , Acta Metal l . , i n p r e s s (24) E. Hornbogen, Acta Metal 1 . - 32, 615 (1984)
R B i r r i n e r
m,
365 ( i 9 8 2 ) H. G l e i t e r , H.-P. Klein and P. Marquardt, Phys. L e t t e r s , H. G l e i t e r and P. Marquardt, Zeitschr.f.Metallk. 75, 263 (1984) -Y. Waseda and T . Masumoto, Z.Physik B 22, 121 (1975) Y. Waseda and M. Ohtani , phys.stat.so1 (b)
62,
535 (1974)F.E. Luborsky, i n Ferromagnetic N a t e r i a l s , ( E . Wohlfahrt, ed.) North Holland Publ
.,
N . Y . , 1980, p. 453 abd 483C. Granquist and R. Buhrman, J.App1 .Phys. - 47, 2200 (1978)
M.J. Weins, H. G l e i t e r and B. Chalrners, J n l . of Appl .Phys. - 42, 2639 (1971) P. Pumphrey, T. Malis and H. G l e i t e r , Phil.Mag. - 34, 159 (1976).
DISCUSSION
K.L. Merkle: Would you c a r e t o s p e c u l a t e about t h e p h y s i c s behind t h e g r e a t reduction i n s a t u r a t i o n magnetization o f t h e s i n t e r e d Fe p o l y c r y s t a l s ? What is t h e reduction i n bulk density?
H. . G l e i t e r : The reduction i n t h e macroscopic d e n s i t y o f t h e n a n o c r y s t a l l i n e m a t e r i a l i s about 50%. A t p r e s e n t we do n o t know how much o f t h i s d e n s i t y d e f i c i t is due t o small voids and how much r e s u l t s from t h e presence o f t h e high d e n s i t y o f i n t e r f a c e s . The observed reduction i n s a t u r a t i o n magnetization is assumed t o be due t o t h e d e v i a t i o n o f n e a r e s t neighbour d i s t a n c e s o f t h e i r o n atoms i n t h e boundary regions a s compared t o t h e p e r f e c t l a t t i c e . It h a s been shown t h e o r e t i c a l l y t h a t a change o f a few percent i n t h e spacing between neighbouring i r o n atoms r e s u l t s i n a s t r o n g reduction o f t h e magnetic moment. Perhaps t h e most w e l l known experimental evidence f o r t h i s e f f e c t is t h e change o f t h e magnetic p r o p e r t i e s o f i r o n when grown a s a t h i n f i l m e p i t a x i a l l y on s u i t a b l e s u b s t r a t e s s o t h a t t h e spacing between neighbouring i r o n atoms d e v i a t e s from t h e equilibrium value i n t h e bulk ( c f . a l s o t h e comments Prof. Andersen).
O.K. Andersen: I would l i k e t o remark t h a t t h e magnetization o f i r o n is highly s e n s i t i v e t o t h e l o c a l atomic coordination. For i n s t a n c e , a t a p r e s s u r e o f 100
C4-402 JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE
k b a r s , which merely d e c r e a s e s t h e l a t t i c e c o n s t a n t and t h e magnetization by a few p e r c e n t , bcc Fe undergoes a first o r d e r phase t r a n s i t i o n and becomes hcp and nonmagnetic, j u s t l i k e Ru and 0 s . This f a c t , t h a t a few p e r c e n t decrease o f t h e magnetization c a u s e s t h e hcp r a t h e r than t h e bcc s t r u c t u r e t o be s t a b l e was explained by u s s e v e r a l y e a r s ago a s t h e b a s i s o f t h e e l e c t r o n i c s t r u c t u r e . If Fe is constrained t o remain i n t h e hcp ( o r f c c ) s t r u c t u r e ( f o r i n s t a n c e , a s an e p i t a x i a l l a y e r grown on a noble-metal s u b s t r a t e ) and t h e l a t t i c e c o n s t a n t i s now i n c r e a s i n g a few p e r c e n t (by changing t h e composition o f t h e s u b s t r a t e a l l o y ) t h e magnetization r i s e s a b r u p t l y from Oh/atom ( o r 0.6 /atom i n t h e f c c s t r u c t u r e )
t o about 3 /atom.
b
r~
H. G l e i t e r : We a r e aware o f t h e s e observations. I n f a c t , they have been used t o i n t e r p r e t t h e low s a t u r a t i o n magnetization observed ( c f . r e f . 25 o f t h e manuscript).
G. K u I would l i k e t o comment on t h e o r i e n t a t i o n r e l a t i o n s h i p observed i n your i n t e r p h a s e boundary experiments. If you were t o c o n s i d e r t h e e n t i r e i n t e r s e c t i o n group (and n o t only its t r a n s l a t i o n a l subgroup, t h e so-called CSL) you would f i n d t h a t o f your o r i e n t a t i o n r e l a t i o n s , a r e d i c t a t e d t o y i e l d extreme i n i n t e r f a c i a l p r o p e r t i e s . S i n c e you have seen them, we know t h e y - a r e minimas. T h i s is a f i n e example where symmetry arguments, when used i n a g e n e r a l i z e d and ' u n r e s t r i c t e d way may y i e l d u s e f u l information about p r o p e r t i e s .
H. G l e i t e r : I f u l l y a g r e e with Prof. K a l o n j i t s comment. Of c o u r s e , t h e prime motivation f o r o u r experiments was t o f i n d t h e p h y s i c a l p r i n c i p l e which s e l e c t s t h e low energy boundaries from t h e e n t i r e s e t o f boundaries which can be expected on t h e b a s i s o f symmetry o p e r a t i o n s t o y i e l d extrema i n t h e i n t e r f a c i a l p r o p e r t i e s . I n f a c t , t h e problem o f p h y s i d a l l y understanding t h e a t o m i s t i c s t r u c t u r e o f i n t e r f a c e s is analogous t o t h e determination o f t h e s t a b l e c r y s t a l s t r u c t u r e o f a p a r t i c u l a r m a t e r i a l . Crystallography provides t h e framework o f t h e conceivable atom arrangements. However, i n o r d e r t o s e l e c t t h e s t a b l e s t r u c t u r e a m n g a l l conceivable s t r u c t u r e s , we have t o understand t h e p h y s i c a l e f f e c t s c o n t r o l l i n g s t r u c t u r a l s t a b i l i t y .
D. A s t : ( i ) Could you c o m e n t on t h e d e n s i t y d e f i c i t o f t h e s i n t e r e d phase? How is t h i s volume d i s t r i b u t e d ? Mostly a s t t l a r g e t t (say nm) voids o r a s atomic s i z e o r subatomic s i z e " f r e e volumett? ( i i ) Is t h e s i n t e r e d phase s t a b i l i z e d by gas? During r e c r y s t a l l i z a t i o n , is g a s desorbing?
H. G l e i t e r : ( i ) Small angle x-ray s c a t t e r i n g experiments i n d i c a t e t h e presence o f voids t h e average s i z e o f which was about 7 nm i n n a n o c r y s t a l l i n e i r o n with an average c r y s t a l s i z e o f 6 nm. The s c a t t e r i n g experiments showed l i t t l e evidence
f o r voids smaller than about 2 nm. On t h e b a s i s o f t h e s e r e s u l t s and TEM observations on t h e d e n s i t y o f voids (defocus c o n t r a s t o b s e r v a t i o n s ) , one i s led t o conclude t h a t a c o n s i d e r a b l e f r a c t i o n o f t h e observed d e n s i t y d e f i c i t between bulk i r o n and n a n o c r y s t a l l i n e i r o n r e s u l t s from t h e presence o f t h e g r a i n boundaries. ( i i ) There is l i t t l e evidence t h a t t h e n a n o c r y s t a l l i n e s t r u c t u r e i s s t a b i l i z e d by g a s . I r o n specimens were heated up t o 1400 K i n a mass-spectrometer, s o t h a t t h e desorption process could be followed. These experiments showed no measurable desorption o f He.
A. R a i t Could you p l e a s e comment on t h e s t a b i l i t y o f your nanometer g r a i n s i z e p o l y c r y s t a l ?
H. G l e i t e r : On t h e b a s i s o f s t a b i l i t y s t u d i e s involving s e v e r a l n a n o c r y s t a l l i n e metals a s w e l l a s n a n o c r y s t a l l i n e s o l i d s with i o n i c and covalent bonding, it appears t h a t t h e thermal s t a b i l i t y o f t h e n a n o c r y s t a l l i n e m i c r o s t r u c t u r e s c a l e s approximately with t h e melting temperature. Roughly speaking, metals w i t h melting p o i n t s h i g h e r than about 5 0 0 ' ~ a r e found t o be s t a b l e a t ambient temperature o r below.
J.M. Gibson: What is t h e impurity c o n t e n t o f t h e n a n o c r y s t a l l i n e i r o n ? Have you done, f o r example, x-ray fluorescence looking f o r oxygen? It seems t h a t t h e massive s u r f a c e a r e a o f t h e powder used t o prepare t h i s m a t e r i a l might absorb c o n s i d e r a b l e amounts o f i m p u r i t i e s .
H. G l e i t e r : The impurity c o n t e n t was 0.5% o r l e s s ( c f . w r i t t e n version o f t h e manuscript). We have analyzed t h e chemical composition o f o u r specimens by mass spectroscopy and atomic absorption spectroscopy ( c f . r e f . 25 i n t h e w r i t t e n v e r s i o n ) . The oxygen c o n t e n t was determined by a s p e c i a l method capable o f r e v e a l i n g an oxygen c o n c e n t r a t i o n o f 1 ppm. Furthermore oxide formation i n annealed specimens was checked by Mossbauer spectroscopy. None o f t h e methods revealed measurable amounts o f gases. It is c o r r e c t t h a t t h e m a t e r i a l might adsorb c o n s i d e r a b l e amounts o f i m p u r i t i e s a t t h e l a r g e f r e e s u r f a c e . I n o r d e r t o avoid t h i s a d s o r p t i o n , t h e m a t e r i a l was produced by a "self-cleaningtt method ( s i m i l a r t o a Wilson chamber) i n a He atmosphere t h e r e a c t i v e i m p u r i t i e s o f which were removed by g e t t e r i n g them with evaporated i r o n . The g e t t e r m a t e r i a l r e s u l t i n g from t h i s procedure was accummulated on a s e p a r a t e cold t r a p s o t h a t it could n o t i n t e r f e r e w i t h t h e i r o n evaporated subsequently i n t o t h e "cleanedv He i n o r d e r t o o b t a i n t h e n a n o c r y s t a l l i n e m a t e r i a l . This p r e c a u t i o n s turned o u t t o be c r u c i a l f o r o b t a i n i n g n a n o c r y s t a l l i n e i r o n w i t h an impurity c o n t e n t o f < 0.5%.
Y. I s h i d a : Comment: Mijssbauer experiment on 1 1 9 m ~ n i n t h e g r a i n boundary o f Fe showed ferromagnetism is l a r g e l y changed by IVB t o VIB elements ( i n c l u d i n g P). It
C4-404 JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE
appears t h a t your spectrum should t a k e i n t o account t h i s e f f e c t . The argument o f specimen s t r u c t u r e upon s i n t e r i n g t h e f i n e p a r t i c l e s may be c l a r i f i e d e i t h e r by HREM o r by examining s i m i l a r f i n e grained s t r u c t u r e s such a s ~ r + bombarded Fe t h i n f o i l .
H. G l e i t e r : The p o i n t concerning t h e IVB and VIB i m p u r i t i e s is w e l l taken.
However, a s we know from chemical a n a l y s i s t h a t our specimens contain no measurable amount o f i m p u r i t i e s o f t h i s k i n d , we neglected t h e s e e f f e c t s s o f a r . HREM s t u d i e s a s w e l l a s EXAFS (e.g. NMR, low temperature s p e c i f i c h e a t , XPS) a r e a p p l i e d t o c h a r a c t e r i z e t h e new s t r u c t u r e .
H.T. Sawhill: We a l s o f r e q u e n t l y s e e alignment o f low index d i r e c t i o n s i n Ni/NiO i n t e r f a c e s . I n t h i s c a s e t h e geometry would n o t follow such a "lock-in s t r u c t u r e t f . Would you expect t h a t such a model would apply a l s o t o t r a n s i t i o n metal/ionic i n t e r f a c e s o r can you make conclusions only about noble metal/ionic i n t e r f a c e s ?
H. G l e i t e r : On t h e b a s i s o f t h e d a t a p r e s e n t l y a v a i l a b l e we can draw conclusions only about noble metal/ionic i n t e r f a c e s . An attempt t o extend t h e work t o o t h e r metals w i l l be made.
G. Elssner: Would you a g r e e t h a t your locked-in t y p e o f i n t e r f a c e may be r e s t r i c t e d t o combinations o f metal and i o n i c c r y s t a l s o r s a p p h i r e , r e s p e c t i v e l y , with low i n t e r f a c e energy o r low chemical a f f i n i t y ?
H. G l e i t e r : It is d i f f i c u l t t o comment without having measurements on systems with high i n t e r f a c e energy and/or high chemical a f f i n i t y . However, my guess is t h a t such systems may well show d i f f e r e n t behaviour. Additional r e s e a r c h is planned t o check t h e v a l i d i t y o f t h e nlock-inlf model prbposed f o r systems o t h e r than noble metals and i o n i c c r y s t a l s .