• Aucun résultat trouvé

Fire protection of windows using sprinklers

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Fire protection of windows using sprinklers"

Copied!
5
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Publisher’s version / Version de l'éditeur:

Construction Technology Update, 1997-12-01

READ THESE TERMS AND CONDITIONS CAREFULLY BEFORE USING THIS WEBSITE.

https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/copyright

Vous avez des questions? Nous pouvons vous aider. Pour communiquer directement avec un auteur, consultez la première page de la revue dans laquelle son article a été publié afin de trouver ses coordonnées. Si vous n’arrivez pas à les repérer, communiquez avec nous à PublicationsArchive-ArchivesPublications@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca.

Questions? Contact the NRC Publications Archive team at

PublicationsArchive-ArchivesPublications@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca. If you wish to email the authors directly, please see the first page of the publication for their contact information.

NRC Publications Archive

Archives des publications du CNRC

Access and use of this website and the material on it are subject to the Terms and Conditions set forth at

Fire protection of windows using sprinklers

Kim, A. K.; Lougheed, G. D.

https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/droits

L’accès à ce site Web et l’utilisation de son contenu sont assujettis aux conditions présentées dans le site LISEZ CES CONDITIONS ATTENTIVEMENT AVANT D’UTILISER CE SITE WEB.

NRC Publications Record / Notice d'Archives des publications de CNRC:

https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/view/object/?id=ee364f9d-e252-4a4d-9d42-8381b9deb026 https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/voir/objet/?id=ee364f9d-e252-4a4d-9d42-8381b9deb026

(2)

b y A .K. Kim a nd G.D. Loughe e d

Building ow ners and designers have been limited in the extent to w hich they

can use glazing in fire-rated separations. This Update presents the results of

IRC research on the use of dedicated sprinkler systems to protect glazing

in fires and provides guidelines that w ill ensure effective protection in

different situations.

C o n s t r u c t i o n T e c h n o l o g y U p d a t e N o . 1 2

Th ere is an in creasin g d em an d for th e u se of glazin g assem blies in fire sep aration s an d in th e bu ild in g en velop e for aesth etic, secu rity an d econ om ic reason s. Ord in ary glass can n ot be u sed becau se th erm al stresses w ill cau se it to sh atter after on ly a few m in u tes of exp osu re to fire. Th erefore, for fire-rated assem blies, North Am erican m od el bu ild in g cod es lim it vertical glazin g to w ired glass in steel fram es w ith a m axim u m glazin g d im en sion of 1400 m m . Th is rep resen ts a severe restriction for d esign ers.

To overcom e th ese lim itation s w ith ou t com p rom isin g fire safety, fire research ers at

NRC’s In stitu te for Research in Con stru ction (IRC) d evelop ed a p rotection m eth od in volvin g th e u se of a d ed icated au tom atic sp rin kler system th at ap p lies a film of w ater to th e glazin g assem bly.[1] Th e IRC in vesti-gation s d em on strated th at tem p ered or h eat-stren gth en ed glass (w h ich , by itself, p rovid es on ly m in im al p assive fire p rotection ), p ro-tected by su ch a sp rin kler system , w ill rem ain in tact for m ore th an 1 h ou r. Based on th ese stu d ies, th e sp rin kler-p rotection system h as been accep ted by som e cod e au th orities for u se in fire sep aration s in bu ild in gs for sp ecific ap p lication s.

T he rm a l Shoc k

Tests w ith a sm all-scale rad ian t p an el d em on strated th at cold w ater ap p lied to h ot glazin g can cau se p rem atu re failu re of th e glass.[2] With ou t w ater p rotection , tem p ered an d h eat-stren gth en ed glazin g can su stain a glazin g tem p eratu re on th e exp osed sid e of m ore th an 350°C. How ever, w h en w ater w as sp rayed on to th e h ot glazin g, th e glazin g failed at m u ch low er tem p eratu res. Th e critical tem p eratu res establish ed for h eat-stren gth en ed an d tem p ered glazin g are 150–165°C an d 200°C, resp ectively.[2] Th e critical tem p eratu re for p lain glass (80–90°C) is too low to allow for effective p rotection u sin g a sp rin kler system . Th ese in vestigation s establish ed th at in ord er for a sp rin kler to p rovid e effective p rotection , it m u st be activated before th e glazin g tem p eratu re exceed s its critical level.

Fire Protection of Window s

Using Sprinklers

Figure 1.Section through test room

a

a

aaa

a a a aaa

aaaaaaa

aaa

aa

aaa

a

Baffle Gravel Exposure fire Glazing Exhaust stack inlet Gas Air

West Linear propane burner East Control

thermocouples

(3)

2

De sign Conside ra t ions

Specific design considerations for a d ed icated sp rin kler-p rotection system for a fu ll-h eigh t (floor to ceilin g) w in d ow assem bly are ad d ressed below. Th ese in clu d e: • w in d ow w id th ,

• m u llion d ep th , an d • m u lti-sp rin kler system s.

For all tests, a fast-resp on se sp rin kler w as u sed .[1,2,4] In th e tests, a sp rin kler w as in stalled in a h orizon tal orien tation an d p osition ed at th e top cen tre of a w in d ow assem bly. Th e cen trelin e of th e sp rin kler’s d eflector w as located 50 m m below th e top w in d ow fram e, an d th e d eflector p osition ed

13 m m from th e glass (see Figu re 2). Th e sp rin kler w as activated by th e fire, an d th e w ater p ressu re at th e sp rin kler w as m ain -tain ed at 145 kPa.

Window Width

Tests w ere con d u cted to d eterm in e th e m axim u m w id th of glazin g th at can be p ro-tected u sin g a sin gle sp rin kler. For glazin g 3000 m m w id e, w ith n o sep aratin g m u llion , th e w ater sp ray from a sin gle sp rin kler p ro-vid ed good coverage for all su rfaces of th e w in d ow an d fram e, w ith ad equ ate w ater film flow on th e glazin g su rface (see Figu re 3). Glazin g tem p eratu res reach ed stead y con d i-tion s in less th an 10 m in u tes an d th e w in d ow system m ain tain ed its in tegrity for th e 2-h ou r test d u ration .

Mullion Depth

Tests were conducted with 10-mm and 25-mm d eep m u llion s. Th e resu lts in d icated th at m u llion s w ith d ep th s of 25 m m or m ore in terfered w ith th e w ater sp ray to th e glazin g on both sid es of th e m u llion . Th e con clu sion is th at a sin gle sp rin kler w ill n ot p rovid e ad equ ate p rotection for su ch a glazin g assem bly. For w in d ow s w ith m u llion s m ore th an 25 m m d eep , th erefore, m u lti-sp rin kler p rotection system s sh ou ld be con sid ered .[4]

Multi-Sprinkler Systems

Wh en a m u lti-sp rin kler system is u sed to p rotect a w id e w in d ow or a w in d ow w ith a d eep m u llion , th e w ater sp ray from th e first

N RC Te st Fa c ilit y

Th e fu llscale fire tests on sp rin klerp rotected w in d ow assem -blies w ere con d u cted in a room w ith a floor area of 3600 m m by 3300 m m an d a ceilin g h eigh t of 3300 m m .[2] A sketch of th e test facility is sh ow n in Figu re 1.

Fire exp osu re w as p rovid ed by a lin ear p rop an e bu rn er in stalled n ear th e floor ad jacen t to th e w est w all of th e test room . Com bu stion air w as su p p lied th rou gh a p erforated steel d u ct located ben eath th e bu rn er. Com bu stion p rod u cts an d steam w ere w ith d raw n from th e room u sin g n atu ral ven tilation th rou gh tw o exh au st stacks w ith a 600-m m by 450-m m cross-section .

Fire Ex posure

Th e fire exp osu re w as establish ed by con d u ctin g a p relim in ary test w ith ou t sp rin kler op eration to d eterm in e th e p rop an e flow rate requ ired to m ain tain th e average tem p eratu re in th e en closed com p artm en t as close as p ossible to th e stan d ard tim e-tem p eratu re cu rve, u sed for d eterm in in g th e fire resistan ce of bu ild in g assem blies.[3]

Th e p rop an e flow rate d eterm in ed in th e calibration test w as th en u sed for th e tests w ith sp rin kler p rotection . Th e on ly sp rin klers op eratin g d u rin g th e tests w ere th ose u sed to p rotect th e w in d ow assem bly. Alth ou gh su ch a system w ou ld , in m ost cases, be u sed in a bu ild in g w ith overall sp rin kler p rotection , it is assu m ed th at th e w in d ow -p rotection system w ou ld be a d ed icated on e, sep arate from th e m ain sp rin kler system .

Figure 3.Location of single sprinkler for protection for full-height window assembly (elevation)

max 3000 1500 3300 Single sprinkler 50

Figure 2.Sprinkler location relative to full-height window assembly (section)

13 mm

50 mm

To p rovid e ad equ ate p rotection , th e fast-resp on se sp rin kler m u st h ave a tem p era-tu re ratin g of 74°C an d a Resp on se Tim e In d ex (RTI) of 22.7 m1/ 2s1/ 2 or low er.

(4)

in terest to bu ild in g d esign ers for aesth etic reason s. A stu d y to d eterm in e th e effectiven ess of su ch a system revealed tw o con -cern s: sp rin kler activation tim e an d w ater sp ray p attern on to th e glazin g su rface.

Sprinkler activation time. Ceilin g-m ou n ted

sp rin klers, both stan d ard an d fast-resp on se, d id n ot activate in tim e to p rotect fu ll-h eigh t tem p ered glazin g from a sm all fire located on th e floor ad jacen t to th e glass.[4] Th is lim its th e u se of ceilin g-m ou n ted sp rin klers in p rotectin g glazin g assem blies. Th ey can , h ow ever, be u sed in th ose cases w h ere th e base of th e glazin g is at least 1000 m m above th e floor. In su ch in stan ces, th e ch an ces of h avin g a localized fire im p in gin g d irectly on th e glazin g are sm all an d , th u s, th e system would not likely be faced with this challenge.

Spray pattern. A series of sp ray-p attern

tests in d icated th at th e p robability of glass breakage from fire exp osu re in creases gen -erally w ith an in crease in sill d ep th , an in crease in sp rin kler h eigh t above th e top of th e glazin g an d an in crease in sp rin kler d istan ce from th e w in d ow.[2] Th is is based on th e size of th e d ry area on th e glazin g observed for each con figu ration . As th e d ry area in creases, th ere is an in creased p roba-bility of glass breakage from th erm al stress. Based on th ese stu d ies, m axim u m s for each p aram eter w ere establish ed as follow s (see Figu re 5):

• a sill d ep th of 150 m m ,

• a sp rin kler h eigh t above th e w in d ow of 450 m m , an d

• a sp rin kler d istan ce of 600 m m from th e w in d ow.[4]

For d esign p u rp oses, th e th ree p aram eters are in terrelated . Th e d esign er sh ou ld select d istan ces th at w ill m axim ize w ater sp ray to all areas of th e glazin g.

Fire tests u sin g a ceilin gm ou n ted sp rin -kler w ith a 1800-m m -w id e tem p ered glazin g system at th ese m axim u m d istan ces

sh ow ed th at th e w ater sp ray w as su fficien t to p rovid e 1-h ou r fire p rotection .

If a ceiling-mounted fast-response sprinkler is located at an id eal p osition — 300 m m aw ay from th e glazin g su rface, an d 300 m m above th e top of a w in d ow w ith a w in d ow -sill d ep th of 50 m m or less — th e w ater sp ray p rovid es su fficien t p rotection for a w in d ow assem bly w ith tem p ered glazin g an d a m axim u m w id th of 2600 m m (see Figu re 6) for at least on e h ou r.[2] For a w id er w in d ow, a m u lti-sp rin kler system sh ou ld be u sed . Th e d elay in sp rin kler sp rin kler activated cou ld d elay th e activation

of an ad jacen t sp rin kler. Tests w ere con -d u cte-d to stu -d y th e p roblem .

For very wide windows without a mullion, th e activation tim es of sp rin klers, located 2000 m m from a sp rin kler op eratin g at a p ressu re of 145 kPa, w ere in th e ran ge of 5 to 7 m in u tes. How ever, th e critical tem p eratu re for th e glazin g w as n ot reach ed u n til 10 to 11 m in u tes. As su ch , th e secon d sp rin kler w ou ld activate before critical con d ition s are reach ed . Th erefore, a w id e w in d ow or a w in d ow w ith ou t m u llion s can be p rotected by a m u lti-sp rin kler system , w ith ou t th e con cern of d elayed sp rin kler

activation , w h en sp rin klers are located at least 2000 m m ap art (see Figu re 4).[4]

When there is a centre mullion (of at least 50-m m d ep th ) betw een th e sp rin klers, th e in flu en ce of w ater sp ray from th e ad jacen t sp rin kler is n ot sign ifican t; in th is case, th e secon d sp rin kler activated in less th an 40 secon d s.[2]

Th e activation tim e of th e secon d sp rin kler is d ep en d en t on sp rin kler orien tation an d location . If th e geom etry is ch an ged , th e overall p rotection system sh ou ld be evalu ated to d eterm in e th e effectiven ess of th e d ed icated sp rin kler system .

Ce iling-M ount e d Sprink le rs

Th e u se of ceilin g-m ou n ted p en d en t sp rin klers to p rotect glazing assemblies is of particular

3

Figure 4.Location of sprinklers in multi-sprinkler system for protection of wide windows (elevation)

greater than 3000

at least 2000 max 1500

Sprinklers

Figure 5.Limiting distances for ceiling-mounted pendent sprinklers (section)

max 450

1000

max 600

(5)

activation d u e to ad jacen t sp rin kler op era-tion is n ot a p roblem if th e sp rin klers are sp aced at least 1800 m m ap art.

Sum m a ry

Th e IRC stu d ies in d icated th at tem p ered or h eat-stren gth en ed glazin g cou ld be p rotected for m ore th an on e h ou r u sin g a d ed icated sp rin kler system . How ever, th ere are certain lim itation s on glazin g w id th , m u llion d ep th , th e u se of sin gle vs. m u lti-sp rin klers, an d th e u se of ceilin g sp rin klers. For th e sp rin kler system to p erform effectively in p rotectin g w in d ow assem blies, th ese lim i-tation s m u st be taken in to accou n t. Th ey are su m m arized as follow s:

• A d ed icated fast-resp on se sp rin kler can be u sed to p rotect a fu ll-h eigh t w in d ow assem bly from both a large com p artm en t fire an d a sm all fire located on th e floor im m ed iately ad jacen t to th e glazin g. Th e sp rin kler sh ou ld be m ou n ted ad jacen t to the glazing at the top centre of the window assem bly.

• A sin gle sp rin kler sh ou ld n ot be u sed to p rotect glazin g w id er th an 3000 m m . • A sin gle sp rin kler sh ou ld n ot be u sed to

p rotect a w in d ow assem bly w ith a m u l-lion h avin g a d ep th of 25 m m or m ore. • A m u lti-sp rin kler system can be u sed

to p rotect glazin g w id er th an 3000 m m if th e sp rin klers are sp aced at least 2000 m m ap art.

• If th ere is a cen tre m u llion w ith a d ep th of at least 50 m m located betw een th e

sp rin klers, th e sp acin g betw een th e sp rin klers n eed n ot be lim ited .

• A ceilin g-m ou n ted p en d en t sp rin kler can be used to protect a window assembly whose base is at least 1000 m m above th e floor. • For a ceilin g-m ou n ted p en d en t sp rin kler,

th e m axim u m s for certain p aram eters w ere establish ed as follow s: a sill d ep th of 150 m m , a sp rin kler h eigh t above th e w in d ow of 450 m m , an d a sp rin kler d istan ce from th e w in d ow assem bly of 600 m m . Becau se th ese th ree p aram eters are in terrelated , th e d esign er sh ou ld select d istan ces th at m axim ize w ater sp ray to all areas of th e glazin g.

• For a ceilin gm ou n ted fastresp on se sp rin -kler at th e id eal location (300 m m above th e w in d ow an d 300 m m from a window with a sill depth of 50 mm or less), glazin g w ith a m axim u m w id th of 2600 m m can be p rotected for u p to 1 h ou r.

• For multi-sprinkler arrangements mounted on th e ceilin g, th e sp rin klers sh ou ld be sp aced at least 1800 m m ap art.

Re fe re nc e s

1. Rich ard son , J.K. an d Oleszkiew icz, I. Fire Tests on Win d ow Assem blies Protected by Au tom atic Sp rin klers, Fire Tech n ology, Vol. 23, No. 2, May 1987, p p . 115-132.

2. Kim , A.K. an d Lou gh eed , G.D. Th e Protection of Glazin g System s w ith Ded icated Sp rin klers, Jou rn al of Fire Protection En gin eerin g, Vol. 2, 1990, p p . 49-59.

3. CAN4-S101-M82, Stan d ard Meth od s of Fire En d u ran ce Tests for Bu ild in g Con stru ction an d Materials, Un d erw riters’ Laboratories of Can ad a, Scarborou gh , ON, 1982.

4. Kim , A.K. Protection of Glazin g in Fire Sep aration s by Sp rin klers, Proceed in gs of th e Sixth In tern ation al In terflam Con feren ce, Oxford , UK, 1993, p p . 83-93.

Dr. A .K. Kiman d Dr. G.D. Loughe e d are sen ior research officers in th e Fire Risk Man agem en t Program of th e N ation al Research Cou n cil’s In stitu te for Research in Con stru ction .

“Construction Te chnology Up d a te s” is a se rie s of te chnica l a rticle s conta ining p ra ctica l inform a tion d istille d from re ce nt construction re se a rch.

For more information, contact Institute for Research in Construction, National Research Council of Canada, Ottaw a K1A 0R6

Telephone: (613) 993-2607; Facsimile: (613) 952-7673; Internet: http://irc.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca

© 1997

Nation al Research Cou n cil of Can ad a Decem ber 1997

ISSN 1206-1220

Figure 6.Location (ideal) of ceiling-mounted pendent sprinkler relative to window assembly (elevation)

2600

1000

Figure

Figure 1. Gas Air Section through test room West a a aaa a a a aaa Exposure fire Linear propane burner Gravel Baffle aaaaaaa aaa aa Exhaust stack inlet Glazing aaa East a
Figure 3. Location of single sprinkler for protection for full-height window assembly (elevation)
Figure 5. Limiting distances for ceiling-mounted pendent sprinklers (section)

Références

Documents relatifs

The current progressive increase in air temperature makes fruit trees particularly fragile because of their long life during which they might accumulate stresses and the

Furthermore, 30% of the proteins differentially expressed between luminal and TN tumors were validated in a larger cohort of 406 TN and 469 luminal tumors through

Here, in an experimental study on a whole tree in a large-scale wind tunnel, we present the first empirical evidence that foliage motion is actually dominated by individual leaf

We analyze the bargaining between land and water rights owners and the bottler Vittel to determine how transaction cost issues (valuation disputes, bi-lateral monopoly conditions,

The CHG-T1 solution was signifi- cantly more efficacious to prevent CRBSIs when compared to the PVI-T1 solution without any additional cost for the ICU (€21,927 (95%CI:

Experiments with the other language pairs were carried out as with Eng>Fre: greedy search over single coarse models followed by greedy search over model

51 School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom 52 School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom 53 Oliver

In order to illustrate the effect of the size of the box on the noise level in the retrieved displacement field as well as on the “damping” of the signal as a function of the