• Aucun résultat trouvé

Automatic differentiation of a structural analysis code (OpenNastran) Application to the aeroelastic optimization of a flight demonstrator

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Automatic differentiation of a structural analysis code (OpenNastran) Application to the aeroelastic optimization of a flight demonstrator "

Copied!
1
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Automatic differentiation of a structural analysis code (OpenNastran) Application to the aeroelastic optimization of a flight demonstrator

Master level (6 months from MARCH 2017)

Advisor Joan Mas Colomer, PhD ONERA/ISAE-SUPAERO Prof Joseph Morlier, ISAE-SUPAERO

Context : In mathematics and computer algebra, automatic differentiation (AD) [1], [2], also called algorithmic differentiation or computational differentiation, is a set of techniques to numerically evaluate the derivative of a function specified by a computer program. AD exploits the fact that every computer program, no matter how complicated, executes a sequence of elementary arithmetic operations (addition, subtraction, multiplication, division, etc.) and elementary functions (exp, log, sin, cos, etc.). By applying the chain rule repeatedly to these operations, derivatives of arbitrary order can be computed automatically, accurately to working precision, and using at most a small constant factor more arithmetic operations than the original program.

Within the context of structural optimization or multidisciplinary optimization problems that involve the use of a structural code, it is often necessary to compute the gradients of the objective function or the constraints with respect to the design variables whenever gradient-based optimization methods are used. In the case of multidisciplinary optimization, it is often required to execute different computational codes, which makes it makes it not possible to obtain the gradient of these functions by differentiating a single code only. In this particular case, automatic differentiation may be used to obtain certain partial derivatives for the computation of the coupled gradient.

The recent publication by NASA of the source code of a NASTRAN version [6], one of the most used structural analysis codes among the aerospace industry and research fields, represents an opportunity of application of automatic differentiation to structural optimization. There exist several ways of applying automatic differentiation: source code transformation and operator overloading. The first form, source code transformation (method used by TAPENADE [3] and OpenAD [4], for example), consists in replacing the source code for a function by an automatically generated source code that includes statements for calculating the derivatives interleaved with the original instructions.

The internship will be paid (monthly bonus: € 550) and carried out in the laboratories of the ISAE- SUPAERO in the joint research unit with ONERA (ECR MDO). Background:

• Computer sciences – Applied Mathematics

References

[1] "Automatic Differentiation." Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Automatic_differentiation.

[2] Martins, Joaquim R. R. A., and John T. Hwang. "Review and Unification of Methods for Computing Derivatives of Multidisciplinary Computational Models." AIAA Journal 51, no. 11 (2013): 2582-599. doi:10.2514/1.j052184.

[3] Hascoet, Laurent, and Valérie Pascual. "The Tapenade Automatic Differentiation Tool." ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software 39, no. 3 (2013): 1-43. doi:10.1145/2450153.2450158.

[4] Utke, J. "OpenAD : Algorithm Implementation User Guide." 2004. doi:10.2172/834715.

[5] Martins, Joaquim R. R. A., Peter Sturdza, and Juan J. Alonso. "The Complex-step Derivative Approximation." ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software 29, no. 3 (2003): 245-62. doi:10.1145/838250.838251.

[6] Nasa. "NASTRAN-95." GitHub. 2015. https://github.com/nasa/NASTRAN-95.

Références

Documents relatifs

La question se posait donc de savoir si l'élaboration théorique de ces éléments manquants relevait de la linguistique pure ou de la linguistique appliquée; et dès lors que la

Source Transformation AD is really the best approach to the adjoint mode of AD, which computes gradients at a remarkably low cost. Adjoint AD is a

We propose a mixed approach that uses both operator overloading and source transformation to differentiate an input code that is largely written in C++ but whose

Unité de recherche INRIA Rennes : IRISA, Campus universitaire de Beaulieu - 35042 Rennes Cedex (France) Unité de recherche INRIA Rhône-Alpes : 655, avenue de l’Europe - 38330

The results we have obtained until now show that the strategy we used in this work (machine learning techniques using association rules based on lexical and grammatical features)

The difference in the estimate between survival and time to treatment failure (10%-15%) merely re flects treatment failure in both arms (that do not differ significantly). Finally

Based on limited data, some practical recommendations are given such as, regarding the influence of the induced loads in the membrane and on the performance integrity of the

Cette étude a montré que les mesures issues des instruments AMSU quand elles sont combinées avec des estimations fiables de l’émissivité et de la température de surface,