• Aucun résultat trouvé

Microbial interactions control décomposition

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Microbial interactions control décomposition"

Copied!
15
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HAL Id: hal-02816042

https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-02816042

Submitted on 6 Jun 2020

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

Microbial interactions control décomposition

Sébastien Fontaine, Catherine Hénault, Pierre-Alain Maron, Annick Oudin, Sandrine Revaillot, Vincent Tardy

To cite this version:

Sébastien Fontaine, Catherine Hénault, Pierre-Alain Maron, Annick Oudin, Sandrine Revaillot, et al..

Microbial interactions control décomposition. Diurnal to century-scale controls on soil respiratory fluxes. Towards a new generation of integrated experimental and modelling approaches, European Science Foundation (ESF). Innsbruck, AUT., Sep 2009, Innsbruck, Austria. 20 p. �hal-02816042�

(2)

Microbial interactions control decomposition

Sébastien Fontaine INRA Clermont Ferrand France

With the contribution of Maron, P.A., Aamor, A., Bdioui, N., Maire, V., Mary, B.,

Revaillot, S., Tardy, V. & Henault, C.

(3)

The reasons to reconsider current soil models

 Several phenomena remain unexplained by current models (e.g. Stability of deep C).

 Activity and size of microbial populations limit decomposition:

 Less than 2-3% of SOM compounds are colonized by microbes.

 The supply of fresh C stimulates microbial populations and SOM decomposition (priming effect).

Jenkinson et al., 1976; Paul and Clark, 1989; Broadbent, 1947; Bingeman et al., 1953; Wu et al., 1993; Liljeroth et al., 1994; Fontaine et al., 2007;

Rasmussen et al., 2007; Kuzyakov et al., 2009

(4)

Alternative theory of SOC dynamics

Recalcitrant soil organic matter

Energy-poor Nutrient-rich

Fresh C (plant litter, exudates)

Storing microbes

(fast growth, N limited)

Mining microbes

(slow growth, C limited)

Organic wastes Priming effect

competition

Fontaine et al., Ecol Lett (2005) Fontaine et al., Nature (2007)

CO 2 CO 2

(5)

Objectives

 The objectives of this study were:

 identifying the microbial populations that control the priming and,

 testing the theory of “the competition” by identifying

different functions (storing/mining) among these

populations.

(6)

An approach in two steps

Experiment 1: identifying the microbial populations that control the priming effect.

Soil alone (control) Soil+cellulose ( 13 C)

water water+NPK water water+NPK

CO 2 , δ 13 C (Priming measurement) Microbial PLFA

Microbial DNA (B-ARISA and F-ARISA) Molecular inventory of dominant fungi (cloning and sequencing of 18S rDNA of fungi)

Fresh grassland soil (0-20 cm)

Soil incubations

(7)

Experiment 2: who does what?

Soil+cellulose Dishes with malt Sampling of mycelium

Culture pure of fungi

Sequencing of 18S and ITS genes, measurement of growth rate etc Many transplanting

a/ Isolation and identification of cellulolytic fungi

b/ Re-inoculation of fungi to determine their role on SOC (storing/mining).

Irradiated grassland soil

Species 1...Species 10

Soil alone Soil with

cellulose (

13

C)

CO

2

, δ

13

C (Priming measurement)

Total carbon, δ

13

C

(8)

The supply of cellulose induced priming effects.

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350

0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175

Days

Priming effect (mg C-CO2 kg-1 soil)

Low Ns High Ns

 Cellulose decomposers mine SOC.

 This mining is 2 times higher in the low N treatment.

Cellulose exhaustion

Experiment 1

(9)

Effects of cellulose on microbial community: PLFA method

Double-unsaturated FA (18:2w6c)

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180

Days

%mol of total extracted PLFA

Soil+cellulose (+N) Soil+cellulose (-N) Control (+N) Control (-N)

 This suggest that fungi are key actors of cellulose decomposition and SOM mining.

Fungal biomarker

Experiment 1

(10)

Effects of cellulose on microbial community: ARISA method

1./ The B-ARISA band profiles were not affected by the supply of

cellulose.

2./ The F-ARISA band profiles were strongly simplified by the supply of cellulose.

Soil+cellulose (-N) Soil+cellulose (+N) Control (-N)

Control (+N)

 This indicates that few different populations of fungi are involved in the priming.

The molecular inventory identified two major populations : Geomyces pannarum, Humicola fuscoatra (data not shown).

F-ARISA results for the day 40

Experiment 1

(11)

Isolation of 17 strains (6 genus)

Fusarium oxysporum

Bionectria ochroleuca

Trichoderma sp

Geomyces pannorum Mucor hiemalis

Humicola fuscoatra

Unknown species

Isolated species have contrasted growth rates, from 2 mm d -1 for Humicola fuscoatra to 12 mm d -1 for Trichoderma sp.

Experiment 2

(12)

Who is who?

Species Priming

effect

Quantity of soil

12

C (mg C kg

-1

) Trichoderma sp No

Mucor hiemalis No Geomyces pannorum No Humicola Fuscoatra No Trichocladium asperum No

Zygomycete sp No

Fusarium oxysporum Yes 62 ± 26

Bionectria ochroleuca Yes 89 ± 10 Nectria lugdunensis Yes 117 ± 23 Zygorhynchus moelleri Yes 140 ± 48

Mixture of fungi

Yes 72 ± 20

Preliminary results for 190 days of incubation

 This shows the existence of two distinct microbial functional groups (Mining and storing microbes).

Experiment 2

Storing microbes

Mining microbes

(13)

Conclusions

 Fungi are the key actors of cellulose decomposition and SOM mining.

 We show the existence of two distinct microbial functional groups having opposed functions (Mining, storing) regarding to SOM.

 SOM dynamics are controlled by interactions between these

two microbial groups.

(14)

Perspectives

 Several projects devoted to determine:

 The roles of microbial interactions in the regulation of

cycles in ecosystems (Soil as a bank, feedback buffering the impact of warming).

 The impact of diversity loss in cultivated soils on these processes.

 Molecular markers (DNA micro arrays) allowing to follow these key decomposers and the priming in ecosystems.

Funded projects: DIMIMOS et BIOMOS (french ANR agency), NitroEurop

and Carbo-extreme.

(15)

What is the effect of cellulose supply on soil C storage?

High N Low N New soil C ( 13 C) 232 ± 17 235 ± 21

Old soil C ( 12 C) 145 ± 16 296 ± 9

lost by the priming effect

Soil C balance +87 -61

in mg C kg

-1

after the addition of 1000 mg cellulose.

Nitrogen treatments

 Carbon input to soil may decrease soil C content because of the priming effect.

 The availability of nitrogen controls the direction of soil C change.

Experiment 1, preliminary results

Références

Documents relatifs

For instance,the agrifood system integrates the food safety management and the environment protection policies,which would both impact the choice of farming practices such as the use

Results: To address this gap, we created a comprehensive toolbox to model i) microbe-microbe and host- microbe metabolic interactions, and ii) microbial communities using

mined anaerobically on a liquid medium adapted from Halliwell and Bryant’s medium (1953) and expressed as the most probable

We then used this approach to assess the influence of landscape structure and cropping system (conventional versus organic) on microbial diversity and microbial

The priming effect: a point of connection between microbial ecology, C cycling and plant functioning.. Sébastien Fontaine, Aziza Aamor, Catherine Hénault, Pierre-Alain Maron,

This chapter details (1) the diversity of microbial communities and the ecological dynamics of insect host e microbe interactions, (2) the direct and (3) indirect effects of

Under optimum water as well as drought conditions, soils containing BC showed higher soil organic carbon (SOC) mineralization as compared to control soil.. Moreover, BC effects on

No bacteria totally killed by freezing (1% – 90%) The remaining flora will quickly grow during thawing.. • Arrhenius : degradation rate =