• Aucun résultat trouvé

Influence of landscape structure and cropping system on microbial diversity and microbial interactions in vineyards

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Influence of landscape structure and cropping system on microbial diversity and microbial interactions in vineyards"

Copied!
2
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HAL Id: hal-02787591

https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-02787591

Submitted on 5 Jun 2020

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

Influence of landscape structure and cropping system on microbial diversity and microbial interactions in

vineyards

Corinne Vacher, Charlie Pauvert, Thomas Fort, Marc Buee, Valerie Laval, Veronique Edel-Hermann, Laure Fauchery, Angelique Gautier, Isabelle Lesur

Kupin, Laurent Deliere, et al.

To cite this version:

Corinne Vacher, Charlie Pauvert, Thomas Fort, Marc Buee, Valerie Laval, et al.. Influence of land- scape structure and cropping system on microbial diversity and microbial interactions in vineyards.

Séminaire Pôle de Protection des Plantes (CIRAD 3P), Nov 2018, St-Pierre de la Réunion, France.

�hal-02787591�

(2)

Influence of landscape structure and cropping system on microbial diversity and microbial interactions in vineyards

Corinne Vacher1, Charlie Pauvert1, Thomas Fort1, Marc Buée2, Valérie Laval3, Véronique Edel-Hermann4, Laure Fauchery2, Angélique Gautier3, Isabelle Lesur1,5, Laurent Delière6, Jessica Vallance6

1. BIOGECO, INRA, Univ. Bordeaux, 33615 Pessac, France

2. INRA, Université de Lorraine, UMR IAM 1136, Laboratoire d’Excellence ARBRE, Centre INRA-Lorraine, 54280 Champenoux, France

3. BIOGER, INRA, 78850 Thiverval Grignon, France

4. Agroécologie, AgroSup Dijon, CNRS, INRA, Univ. Bourgogne Franche-Comté, 21000 Dijon, France 5. HelixVenture, 33700 Mérignac, France

6. SAVE, Bordeaux Sciences Agro, INRA, ISVV, Univ. Bordeaux, 33882 Villenave d’Ornon, France

Microbial diversity and microbial interactions support many ecosystem services, including the regulation of plant diseases. A current challenge is to robustly infer these microbial community properties from environmental DNA, and to assess their resistance and resilience to agricultural practices and other global change components. To meet this challenge, we first used an artificial microbial community to identify the bioinformatic approach best recovering microbial community properties from metabarcoding data. We then used this approach to assess the influence of landscape structure and cropping system (conventional versus organic) on microbial diversity and microbial interactions in vineyards. We focused on the fungal component of grapevine microbial communities as it includes major pathogens. Our results showed that bioinformatic pipelines using DADA2 to detect amplicon sequence variants were the most effective for recovering the richness and composition of the artificial fungal community. We also showed that fungal dispersal events from forest patches to adjacent vineyards hardly influence grapevine foliar fungal communities. In contrast, the cropping system had a major impact on grapevine foliar fungal communities. Community richness, diversity and evenness were significantly higher in organic plots at the time of sampling, and community composition differed significantly between cropping systems. Fungal association networks also differed, but the high turnover of associations among plots did not allow us to reveal ecological interactions between fungal species. These findings suggest that microbial association networks inferred from metabarcoding data can capture variations in ecosystem functioning but are not robust enough to monitor the disease regulation service provided by the plant microbiota.

Références

Documents relatifs

This study focuses on biofilm microbial communities in a trop- ical mangrove with two different trophic statuses, either exposed or not exposed to effluents from a domestic

Despite the difference of sensitivity of the different algal species to GBMs, the concentrations leading to 50% of algal growth inhibitions all ranged from 20 to over 150  mg.L −1

The soil properties examined were as follows: (i) phys- ical and chemical: aggregate stability index, organic matter content and bulk density; (ii) microbiological: microbial

$PRQJVRLORUJDQLVPVPLFURRUJDQLVPVEDFWHULDDQGIXQJLDUHWKHPRVWLPSRUWDQWLQWHUPVRI GHQVLW\ LQGLYLGXDOVJ VRLO GLYHUVLW\ VSHFLHVJ VRLO DQG LQYROYHPHQW LQ

Preliminary multivariate analysis of >130 samples revealed strong bioregionalisation patterns in microbial eukaryotes, which are in agreement with the classical subdivision of

The simulated tropospheric influx of ozone amounts to 420 Tg per year, and originates in the Northern Hemisphere from the extra-tropical stratosphere, whereas in the Southern

Title: Influence of organic matter and microbial activities on the mobility of arsenic and metals in polluted soils Name(s) of the author(s): Hugues Thouin 1 , Tiffanie

In this study, we aimed to assess soil bacterial and fungal diver- sity in New Caledonian ultramafic substrates and to determine whether floristic composition, edaphic parameters