• Aucun résultat trouvé

Blind Browsing on Hand-Held Devices: Touching the Web... to Understand it Better

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Blind Browsing on Hand-Held Devices: Touching the Web... to Understand it Better"

Copied!
8
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HAL Id: hal-01075380

https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01075380

Submitted on 17 Oct 2014

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

Blind Browsing on Hand-Held Devices: Touching the Web... to Understand it Better

Waseem Safi, Fabrice Maurel, Jean-Marc Routoure, Pierre Beust, Gaël Dias

To cite this version:

Waseem Safi, Fabrice Maurel, Jean-Marc Routoure, Pierre Beust, Gaël Dias. Blind Browsing on Hand-

Held Devices: Touching the Web... to Understand it Better. Data Visualization Workshop (DataWiz

2014) associated to 25th ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media (HYPERTEXT 2014), Sep

2014, Santiago, Chile. �hal-01075380�

(2)

! " #!!$ % ! &'(!!' #!! $ % ! & (

)* + + , + - + . +/ 01 +

ABSTRACT

! "

" # $ % & ' (

)' ( * +

, ,

- +

% # . , - -

, " /

, " % #

- , , & ' (

" ! " " 0 1 , "

,# 2 & "

, " - "

+ % +

, " -

+

" " #

Categories and Subject Descriptors

3.#4# 5 3User Interfaces5 6 )6 *- .

78- - #

General Terms

- 9 - . : - ; #

Keywords

' - - "

- - + #

1. I#TRODUCTIO#

8 " < =- , %

" ' ( , >4 - =?

" - @A , # 2 %

- , B -

- -

" C#

' ( ,

# 8

" ' ( ! "-

+ , " "

#

! "- " , "

, - #

, "

# ," D

B - & -

, " ' ( ) : -

" EE <<< 4 <<<

" " <

* CC# 8 - , "

" " "

# : "

" 3 5# ," D -

9 , "

- " " - 9

%

" ,

) - -###* 3 5#

8 , D

" " " ,

," D / , , ,

' ( 9 , " - ,

& ! "

# 2 ,

- "

" ,

# 8 " B

9 2 ' )2' *

"

,

& " -

F + , "

-

% " #

2 % , B - , ,

' ( - ,

" ,

& - , "

=# 2 , " , "

" " @- , "

# : -

, " #

C B77,,,#, # CC B77,,,# # # 7

(3)

2. STATE OF THE ART FOR VIP TECH#OLOGIES

' (

- ' +3=5-

! , 3@5- G , )G " ! *345#

+ +

#

+ - ,

+ % /

& #

" D , , D - $ " " 3A5- 2 D" D3E5

- ' 8 3>5 ( # $

" .2$;

+ , " - + - D -

# - ," D

, " , - ,

" , " ) 9 *#

$ , " , ' (

, , " - 3?5- , "

" " # 2

+ + , " - +

" +

#

, " " , + "

" 3 @5# 2 " , + ' (

-

+ " D# 2

, + - " -

" ' 6 # $ ," D

+ - ,

+ " , #

$ ( F9: )0$

, " ( 1* 3 <5

" " # 2

, , " -

" , , , "

# 2 ," D

" , , "

, - "

, " , # 2

.2$; " #

Figure 1. Representation of a web page by MAP-RDF model, figure extracted from [10].

- , " /

.2$; # : + - "

# "

+ , #

2 " 3 5-

B ) ,

, > * " D -

" , ) *- = 3 5-

, #

Figure 2. Different devices used in Tactos (Computer, graphics tablet, tactile simulators), figure extracted from [12].

2 " , +

- -

# ! + -

+

#

=< 2 " - " "

# 2 "

% + # 2 "

" # 2 ,

,

" 3 5#

3. PROPOSED TECH#IQUE

: " " " D

3 5#

! , D "

, "

! "# "

" #

2 +

, " - " D %

) * # !

" #

2 , " +

" )

*# 2 " ,

" %

- -

" " D , " " # 2

& "

# " ) $ 2: < ,

* " #

- , , %

" " D "

(4)

, &

" #

2 - ,

, , " #

, " ,

" ) * " #

"

, " # 2

"

" # -

" , " #

: = -

" #

Figure 3. (a) The used micro-vibrator: the range of vibration frequency goes from 20 Hz up to 260 Hz. (b). The embedded system designed in the lab with the Bluetooth module.

4. PRE-TESTS PROTOCOL 4.1 Objectives of Pre-tests

8 "H "

' ( % 9 , " #

=- ,

) @# *- ,

4 ) , *

3 =5- 4 " # 2

"

" "

# 2 , "

" ) +

*#

4.2 Designed Protocol for Vibro-Tactile Access

+ ) " * @

) D*-

) D*# + , -

D

) I- J- -

*# : @ @ -

4 @ #

Figure 4 (a). Image a (Training task).

Figure 4 (b). Images b (#T2), c (#T3), d (#TG) (Training task)

Figure 4. Images of training task.

Figure 5 (a). Image a (Evaluation task).

Figure 5 (b). Images b (IDP1), c (IDP2), d (IDP3). (Evaluation Task).

Figure 5. Images of evaluation tasks.

D-

@ ) - " ) 2 *-

) 2=*- ) 26**- , "

# 2 2 - 2=- 26-

, &

- + 2

& # Figure 3. (a) The used micro-vibrator

Figure 3. (b) The embedded system

(5)

2 D @ - ,

4# & -

+ " 4#"- 4# - 4# - , , D

- "

- , #

! , B

4# & ,

D- " %

#

- 4#" = , % ,

- 4# = ,

% -

4#"- 4# " % -

#

4# ) *-

"

#

2 + +

-

" " " "

, " #

2 , ,

" 3 5# 2 " +

2 - 2=- 26 ) &

" 4

# 2 " D

4# - - , "

, *# " - "

" , #

Table 1. Results of experiments of sighted persons for images

#T2, #T3, #TG. (Table extracted from [1])

2 "

2 >

2= =A A

26 =

! " , "

2 - + "

2=#

5. RESULTS OF EXPERIME#TS WITH BLI#D PERSO#S

5.1. Experiment steps:

2 , 4 "

, B & - +

"H - D- D# 2

+ "

#

5.1.1 Personal and technical questions

, 4 " - , D

, "

" # 2 " % ,

& #

Table 2. Personal information of the blind persons

9 < = @

)J *

A= AE 4? 4A =A

+ $ : $ : :

9

" = 4

< 4

! D ,

" + ,

- - , " ,

! "# 2 " = , ,

& # 2 ,

" ) ! , ; +*

+ " # 2 - -

" , G ! )G "

! *- '9 ) ' 9 D *- 8F -

+ " #

Table 3. Used operating systems and screen readers

! , ; + G ! '9 8F

"

, +

@ < @ <

"

,

"

" " -

, 2 D $ " D ,

D - ' , ( # 8 4

! " ) ( *# 2

" ! " + " -

( , B " : -

" G I - " D , "

, " # )2 " "

" 4 *#

5.1.2 Explaining the objective of the test

2 " " - , +

, "H D -

" " / , +

"H H - , , "

& & #

2 , D

" , +

" #

5.1.3 Training and learning task

D-

@ ) - " ) 2 *- ) 2=*-

) 26**- , # 2

D , "

(6)

D- D , + ,

"

" #

" # 9 D-

)I- J -

( - 2 *#

2 " @ -

@#

Table 4. Times of training task for each user (in minutes) User ID

/ Image ID0 ID1 ID2 ID3 ID4 Total Average A 4,99 2,60 3,55 9,97 3,96 25,08 5,02 b (NT2) 4,40 3,11 0,99 3,30 1,00 12,80 2,56 c (NT3) 2,81 6,29 2,54 2,85 1,15 15,65 3,13 d (NTG) 3,11 3,98 2,02 3,22 1,32 13,65 2,73 Total 15,31 15,99 9,10 19,34 7,43

! " @ D

- " + "

# !

" ,

D# 2 "

# !

" ,

- + , 9@ E#@=

) - 2 - 2=- 26*- " , 9=

?#=@ #

5.1.4 Evaluation task

D- , D 4#

, &

& - , D 4#" )9( *- 4#

)9( *- 4# )9(=*- " - ,

# 2 " 4 ,

& & 4# )2 "

" D 4# -

- , " , *#

) " 4 A- " ,

- " I

, " *#

Table 5. Results of questions for squares in image 4.a User-ID/

Square Name ID

0 ID

1 ID

2 ID

3 ID

4

Number of errors

NT2 X 1

NT3 X X 2

NTG X X 2

! " 4 , "

2 - , ,

" , #

F , & 9( -

9( - 9(= % " A#

Table 6. Answers of questions for images IDP1, IDP2, IDP3

9 9< 9 9 9= 9@

9( = = = = =

,

" "

I I I I I

,

" %

I I I I I I I I I

! " @- 4- A- "

, 9@- " "

" , - "

" ,

) ( , D , ' 8 *#

, & " ) 9( -

9( - 9(=*- , D ,

# : A , ,

9@ ) 9@ , "

, *#

Figure 6. Results of redrawing images IDP1, IDP2, IDP3 for the user ID4.

! , ): A* ,

9( - 9( - 9(=- , -

, , B

# " % - "

" , ,

& " ,

) 9( - 9( - 9(=*#

# " -

" ) - -

-K* " , , &

" , #

2

& % " E#

Table 7. Times of the evaluation task for each user (in minutes) User

ID /

Image ID0 ID1 ID2 ID3 ID4 Total Averag

e A 1,23 9,87 5,39 7,84 1,85 26,17 5,23 IDP1 4,39 14,99 1,41 3,75 1,41 25,96 5,19 IDP2 7,70 9,22 0,79 1,99 13,85 33,55 6,71 IDP3 2,71 12,94 2,81 4,03 12,58 35,06 7,01 Total 16,03 47,02 10,39 17,61 29,68

(7)

5.2 Results Analysis

2 "

D - ,

A ) E- <<### <=- <### =-

<### =- =<### ==*-

#

Figure 7. The 16 areas of the touched-screen of user with ID4 (Red points represent touched points with max pressure values, blue points represent touched points with pressure values less than the max and greater than the average, green points represent touched points with pressure values less than the average).

! - - -

- =<- ==- = - << "

># 2 " +

" "

#

Figure 8. Most and least touched areas on the touched-screen.

9 - ,

" , )(

" / + ,

$ 2: < , *#

2 % - , +

" , - , =# ?- , #E=- ,

, ,

, & + "

, - , +

" , " -

, " ,

# : E +

) 9(= D ,

@*# % , - ,

H ) + *

, , # 2 "

" - ,

" , #

2

-

#

9 , "

& D - " "

#

6. CO#CLUSIO# A#D PERSPECTIVES

- , % , D ,

, "

# 2 "

, "

" " +

, & " #

2 " - ,

+ " , & )

" *- , -

" +

, 7 ,

) " & " - D

&

" - " -

, "

-K*#

, " "

, , D + , , " +

" 7 , - , " "

L + , D L

L L , , " " 7 #

+ , " *

" .2$;

D - " - - - *

$ D "

- , # =* "

- + ,

" -

+ - @* "

/

" - " , D , + ,

" / + "

" , "

- 4* !

# 2 "

"

" - A*

/ , "

, " ,

, " # Acknowledgment

2 , D " F

) F B77,,,#

(8)

# 7 * F2 9 H F 8

<<<= < ) M F 2 + 9

N & * 6F J " ),,,# # *

),,,# # *

),,,# # *#

2 D F " " - " H 28

#

7. REFERE#CES

[1] $ - :#- 9 - 6#- F - G $#- ' - $#- - (#-

$ - $#- - #- < #Haptic Perception of Document Structure for Visually Impaired People on Handled Devices-

( - ' @- < - ( = ? = ?-

B >EE <4<?#

98 O B77 +# # 7 <# < A7H# # < # <#<=A

3 5 $ - :#- ' +- #- F - $#- 8 - #- <<=#

Contribution of the Transmodality Concept to Improve Web

Accessibility# 2 F - '

- <<=- ( >A ?=# / -

/ ,

" # B =>= > =I#

3=5 B77,,,# +# 7 3 E747 < @5

3@5 B77,,,# # 7 ,7, # 3

E747 < @5

345 B77,,,# # 7 3 E747 < @5

3A5 B77 # # 7 7 7 P O # #

# # # % Q O 3 E747 < @5

3E5 B77 # # 7 7 7 P O # #

# # D" DQ O 3 E747 < @5

3>5 B77,,,# # 7 7 " 7 3 E747 < @5

3?5 - #- $ - J#- - #- < #Tactile

Web+avigator Device for Blind and Visually Impaired People#

( < G

2 - G - < #

98 O B77 +# # 7 <# <?7 2# < #A = 4 ?

3 <5 - J#- $ H - $#- 8 - #- ' +- #- <<?#

Accessibility for the Blind, an Automated Audio/Tactile Description of Pictures in Digital Documents#

2 - <<?- ( B 4? 4?@#

98 O B77 +# # 7 <# <?7 2 # <<?#4 E>44

3 5; - #- 6 - 8#- . - #- $ & - #-

6 R - #-Sensory Substitution, Limits and Perspectives#

2 S , -

- <<=- ( B E4 ? #

3 5 2 + - $#- ; - #- ; - 6#- 6 - 8#- " - 9#-

Designing Interactive Content with Blind Users for a Perceptual Supplementation System, 2 < =- < =- ( E

2 " - " "

- - - < =- ( ? =A#

98 O B77 +# # 7 <# @47 @A<A 4# @A<AA=

3 =5 $ F ;- :#- : - !#- 2- (#- F8 28 F - G#$#-

< =#+avigation aveugle sur dispositifs mobiles : toucher le Web... pour mieux l'entendre- AM &

9 T & - 9 A- ; : -

- < =#

3 @5 F - $#- S U - #- - 2#- <<4#A Tactile Web Browser for the Visually Disabled# ( +

$ . + . # $- ,

J D- J- - <<4- 4 #

98 O B77 +# # 7 <# @47 <>==4A# <>==A

Références

Documents relatifs

2) In barrier coverage problem, sensors must form a barrier that detects any event crossing the barrier. A barrier is defined as a segment between two points of the sensor field

4 I shall try to show how Gilles Deleuze’s analyses of the figure in Bacon — and of its interactions with the background — shed light on what happens to language

In works such as [11,16,17,19,24,29], a part of the analysis relies on the construction of 0-forms (i.e. functions) quasi-modes supported in some characteristic wells of the potential

Given a finite bounded lattice L, we construct a diagram of (∨, 0)-semilattices liftable in a variety of lat- tices (or bounded lattices) V if and only if either L or its dual

The hypersingular BIE residual function is found to be equal to the derivative of the strongly singular BIE residual when the same values of the boundary variables are substituted

La première est que la philosophie a généralement une connotation négative auprès des élèves qui suivent une autre option spécifique (OS) que l’OS

The data clearly show a similar magnitude of γ-ray sensitivity of these pre-B bcl2 SCID– cells compared to the pre-B bcl2 SCID+ cells to that shown by the SCID fibroblast cells

In summary, the Champtoceaux micaschists preserve part of a prograde P - T path in garnet inclusion-rich cores, whereas matrix phases (kyanite and phengite) and