• Aucun résultat trouvé

Lateral epicondylitis: New evidence for work relatedness.

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Lateral epicondylitis: New evidence for work relatedness."

Copied!
3
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

JointBoneSpine82(2015)5–7

Availableonlineat

ScienceDirect

www.sciencedirect.com

Editorial

Lateral epicondylitis: New evidence for work relatedness

a r t i c l e i n f o

Keywords:

Epicondylitis Elbowtendionitis Epicondylalgia Occupational Work Cohortstudy Causation

Lateralepicondylitisis oneofthemostcommonupper-limb musculoskeletaldisordersingeneralpractice[1]andinworking population[2]withanestimatedincidencerangingfrom0.3–1.1 per100person-years[3].Its descriptionbyRungein 1873and Majorin1883as“Lawn-tenniselbow”wasduetoitsassociation withthebiomechanicalinjuriesinthissport[4].Recentsystem- aticreviewsconcluded thattherewasmoderateevidenceofan associationbetweenepicondylitisandoccupational exposureto forcefulandrepetitivehandactivities[5,6].However,theevidence forthisassociationwasprimarilybasedoncross-sectionalstudies.

Astherewasonlyoneprospectivestudyavailable[7],thecausality ofthereportedassociationbetweenoccupationalexposureandthe occurrenceoflateralepicondylitishasbeendebated[6].

Threelarge,longitudinalstudiesonmusculoskeletaldisorders wererecentlycompletedwhichaddresstheissuesofworkplace exposuresandriskforlateralepicondylalgiawithgreaterpreci- sion.Inthispaper,wehavesummarizedthesestudiesanddrawn conclusionsfromtheirfindings.

Allthreestudieswerepublishedin2013;twowereconducted intheUnitedStates,andoneinEurope[8–10].Lateralepicondylal- giaisthetermusedforoutcomesinceeachstudyusedastandard definitionforpossibleepicondylitisthatincludedspecificsymp- tomsand/orphysicalexaminationmanoeuvre[11,12](Table1).In theFrenchCosalistudy(PrincipalinvestigatorY.Roquelaure),3710 workers,representativeoftheworkforce,wereidentified by83 occupationalphysicians;thecohortincluded1394workerswith- outelbowpainwhowerefollowedonaveragefor5.5years[8].

Theincidenceoflateralepicondylalgiawas1.0/100person-years.

Self-reportedhighphysicalexertion(Borg20rating>13)combined withreportedelbowflexionandextension,orwithextremewrist bendingfor>2h/day,wasassociated withlateralepicondylalgia withan estimated relative risk of 3.2 in men (95% confidence interval[1.5–6.4])and3.3[1.4–7.6]inwomen.ThePrediCTSstudy (PrincipalinvestigatorB.Evanoff)included1107newlyemployed

workersfrom8companiesand3constructiontradeunionsinthe Saint-Louisarea;699workerswithoutelbowpainatbaselinewere followedonaveragefor2.8years[10].Theincidenceoflateralepi- condylalgiawas1.7/100person-years.Self-reportedexposureto wristbending≥4h/dayandforearmtwisting≥2h/daywasassoci- atedwithlateralepicondylalgia,withanestimatedrelativeriskof 2.5[1.1–5.3].InastudyfromWashingtonState(Principalinvesti- gatorB.A.Silverstein),733workerswereincludedfrom12different manufacturing and service sector industries, with611workers (withoutepicondylitis)followedonaveragefor1.5years[9].The incidenceoflateralepicondylalgiawas4.9/100person-years,and wasassociatedwithforearmpronation≥45for40%ofthetime andpowergrip(bothassessedbyobservation),withanestimated relativeriskof2.8[1.4–5.8].

Although the definitions of lateral epicondylalgia, exposure assessment,inclusioncriteriaandstatisticalmodelsweresome- what different, strenuousmanual tasks involving theelbow or hand wereconsistently foundtobeassociated withthe occur- renceofnewcasesof lateralepicondylalgiain allthree studies.

Thesestudiesdidnotincludedetailedphysicalexaminationsofthe elbowtodifferentiatebetweenepicondylitis,tendinitisandtendi- nosis(andrelatedterms),sothetermlateralepicondylalgiawas preferred.Differentlimitationswerereportedforeachstudy,e.g.

lackofrepresentativenessofnationalworkforce[9,10],attrition [8],self-reportedassessmentofdiagnosis[8]orworkplacephysi- calexposures[8,10],andconfoundingfactors[9].However,oneof thestudieshadarepresentativesample[8],twohadlowattrition ratesandconfirmatoryphysicalexamination[9,10],onehadobser- vationsofexposure[9],andoneacompleteanalysisofconfounders [10].

Thesethreeprospectivestudiesprovidenewevidenceforfourof theHillcriteriaforcausalityinobservationalstudies[13]:tempo- ralsequence,consistencybetweenstudies,strengthofassociation (similarestimationsofrelative risk,between2.5and3.3),anda biologicalgradient increasingwithexposure.Thereisalsogood compatibilitywithfindingsfrompreviousworkplacestudies[6,7]

andwithwhathasbeenobservedinathletes[14]fromoveruse oftheforearmextensormusclesandtheresultantmicrotrauma thatleadstoangiofibroblastictendinosis(biologicalplausibility) [14,15].

Inconclusion,theserecentcomplementaryprospectivestud- iesprovidenewinsights andstrongevidencefor arelationship betweenlateralepicondylalgiaandoccupationalexposuretohigh handforceand non-neutralelbowandwristpostures.Compen- sationguidance,managementandpreventionshouldincorporate

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbspin.2014.10.013

1297-319X/©2014Sociétéfranc¸aisederhumatologie.PublishedbyElsevierMassonSAS.Allrightsreserved.

(2)

6Editorial/JointBoneSpine82(2015)5–7

Table1

Detailsofthethreelongitudinalstudies.

Nameofthecohort(andthe Principalinvestigator)

Country Inclusionandnumber ofworkersfollowed

Definitionoflateral epicondylalgia

Definitionofmain exposure

Incidencerates (per100workers)

RelativeRisk

Cosali(Y.Roquelaure)[8] France 3710workers

examinedby83 occupational physicians, 1394workerswere followedonaveragefor 5.5years

Painaroundlateral epicondylefor4days overaperiodonone weekinthelast 12months,orlocal painonresistedwrist extension

Self-report,high physicalexertion (Borg20rating>13) combinedwithelbow movements(elbow flexionandextension, orextremewrist bending,>2h/day)

Men:1.0 Women:0.9

MenIRR=3.2[1.5;6.4];

WomenIRR=3.3[1.4;

7.6]

Predi-CTS(BAEvanoff)[10] UnitedStated 1107newlyemployed workerswithoutcarpal tunnelsyndromefrom 8companiesand3 tradeunions,699 workerswithoutelbow painwerefollowedon averagefor2.8years

Elbowsymptomsand (eitherone):

a)Painaroundlateral epicondyleatpalpation or

b)Painonresisted wristextension

Self-report, bending4h/dayand twisting2h/day

1.7 OR=2.5[1.1;5.3]

Washingtonstudy(BA Silverstein)[9]

UnitedStates 733workersfrom12 different

manufacturingand servicesector employers,611 workerswerefollowed onaveragefor3.5years

Anyelbowpaininthe past7days,and symptomsoccurring morethan3timesin thelastyear,ANDno previouselbowinjury ANDpainonresisted wristextension

Observed,forearm pronation45for40%

timeandpowergrip

4.9 HR=2.8[1.4–5.8]

IRR:incidentrateratio(adjustedonage,repetitivetask;stratifiedongender);OR:oddsratio(adjustedongender,age,socialsupportlevelofeducation,medicalhistoryofdiabetes,osteoarthritis,rheumaticarthritisandobesity);

HR:hazardratio(adjustedongenderandage).

(3)

Editorial/JointBoneSpine82(2015)5–7 7 thesenewfindingsandpractitionersfromprimarytosecondary

careshouldnotestrenuousbiomechanicalhandandelbowexpo- suresforpatientswithlateralepicondylalgia.

Disclosureofinterest

Thiseditorialreceivednospecificfunding.Norelevantconflict ofinterest(ICMJEfilled).

Theauthorsdeclarethattheyhavenoconflictsofinterestcon- cerningthisarticle.

Acknowledgment

We are particularly thankful to Annette Leclerc, Bradley A Evanoff,and Z Joyce Fanfor theirhelp in theredaction of this editorial.

References

[1]Shiri R, Viikari-JunturaE,VaronenH,et al.Prevalenceanddeterminants of lateral and medial epicondylitis:a population study.Am J Epidemiol 2006;164:1065–74.

[2]DescathaA,HerquelotE,MediouniZ,etal.Épicondylalgieslatéralesdans une cohorte de salariés ligériens:évolution etdéterminants. Rev Rhum 2014;81:328–32.

[3]ShiriR,Viikari-JunturaE.Lateralandmedialepicondylitis:roleofoccupational factors.BestPractResClinRheumatol2011;25:43.

[4]CalfeeRP,PatelA,DaSilvaMF,etal.Managementoflateralepicondylitis:cur- rentconcepts.JAmAcadOrthopSurg2008;16:19–29.

[5]PalmerKT,HarrisEC,CoggonD.Compensatingoccupationallyrelatedtenosyn- ovitisandepicondylitis:aliteraturereview.OccupMedLond2007;57:67–74.

[6]VanRijnRM,HuisstedeBM,KoesBW,etal.Associationsbetweenwork-related factorsandspecificdisordersattheelbow:asystematicliteraturereview.

Rheumatology(Oxford)2009;48:528–36.

[7]LeclercA,LandreMF,ChastangJF,etal.Upper-limbdisordersinrepetitivework.

ScandJWorkEnvironHealth2001;27:268–78.

[8]HerquelotE,GuegenA,RoquelaureY,etal.Work-relatedriskfactorsforinci- denceoflateralepicondylitisinalargeworkingpopulation.ScandJWorkEnv Health2013;39:578–88.

[9]FanZJ,SilversteinBA,BaoSS,etal.Theassociationbetweencombinationof handforceandforearmpostureandincidenceoflateralepicondylitisina workingpopulation.HumFactors2014;56:151–65.

[10]DescathaA,DaleAM,JaegersL,etal.Self-reportedphysicalexposureassoci- ationwithmedialandlateralepicondylitisincidenceinalargelongitudinal study.OccupEnvironMed2013;70:670–3.

[11]HarringtonJM,CarterJT,BirrellL,etal.Surveillancecasedefinitionsforwork relatedupperlimbpainsyndromes.OccupEnvironMed1998;55:264–71.

[12]SluiterBJ,RestKM,Frings-DresenMH.Criteriadocumentforevaluatingthe work-relatednessofupper-extremitymusculoskeletaldisorders.ScandJWork EnvironHealth2001;27:1–102.

[13]GrimesDA,SchulzKF.Biasandcausalassociationsinobservationalresearch.

Lancet2002;359:248–52.

[14]FaroF,WolfJM.Lateralepicondylitis:reviewandcurrentconcepts.JHandSurg 2007;32:1271–9.

[15]EygendaalD,RahussenFTG,DiercksRL.Biomechanicsoftheelbowjointin tennisplayersandrelationtopathology.BrJSportsMed2007;41:820–3.

AlexisDescathaa,b,c,∗

AnnMarieDaled BarbaraA.Silversteine YvesRoquelauref DavidRempelg

aUniversitédeVersaillesSaint-Quentin,78035 Versailles,France

bInserm,UMS011,94807Villejuif,France

cAP–HP,PoincaréUniversityHospital,Occupational HealthUnit,92380Garches,France

dDivisionofGeneralMedicalSciences,Washington UniversitySchoolofMedicine,Saint-Louis,MO,USA

eSafetyandHealthAssessmentandResearchfor Prevention(SHARP),WashingtonStateDepartmentof LaborandIndustries,Olympia,WA,USA

fLUNAMUniversité,Universitéd’Angers,Laboratoire d’ergonomieetd’épidémiologieensantéautravail (LEEST),49045AngersCedex01,France

gDepartmentofMedicine,UniversityofCalifornia, SanFrancisco,CA,USA

Correspondingauthor.InsermUMS011,UVSQ, unitédepathologieprofessionnelle,CHUde Poincaré,104,boulevardPoincaré,92380Garches, France.Tel.:+33147107764;

fax:+33147107768.

E-mailaddress:[email protected] (A.Descatha) Accepted22October2014 Availableonline29December2014

Références

Documents relatifs

The sex offenders in our sample showed a pattern on the SC clusters that was different from the other two offender types; they exhibited low values on all of the SC- related

ZĞƐƵůƚƐ ĨƌŽŵ dĂďůĞ ϰ ĂůƐŽ ƐŚŽǁ ƚŚĂƚ ƚŚĞ ƐĞůĨͲƌĞƉŽƌƚĞĚ ŵĞĂƐƵƌĞ ŝƐ ŵƵĐŚ ůĞƐƐ ƐĞŶƐŝƚŝǀĞ ƚŽ

Our study highlighted the importance of associations between work-related factors, especially specific combination of high physical workload and elbow musculoskeletal pain

Our study highlighted the importance of associations between work-related factors, especially specific combina- tion of high physical workload and elbow musculoskeletal pain and

Il reste donc seulement à démontrer qu’une telle fonction est unique.. Soit f et g deux fonctions satisfaisant les hypothèses de

– Sending feedback: The client generates a feedback record from a token, the previous blind signature and his feedback value – which may also contain a comment1. He sends it to

Interestingly, despite the short sequences, both investigators detected a shift from high to intermediate or no flow and increased flow heterogeneity during progressive mesenteric

Objective: To compare measures of sensation seeking in a clinical group of cocaine-dependent (CD) patients with and without a history of probable childhood