• Aucun résultat trouvé

View of Ford, E. and Zorn, R. (1975). <i>Why be Lonely?</i>

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "View of Ford, E. and Zorn, R. (1975). <i>Why be Lonely?</i>"

Copied!
2
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

144 BOOK REVIEWS/REVUE DE LIVRES Misunderstandings of the Self, V. Raimy, San

Francisco: Jossey-Base, 1975, 199 pp. + xiii, References and Index, $12.50.

Reviewed by: J. W. Vargo Assistance Professor

School of Rehabilitation Medicine University of Alberta

Edmonton, Alberta

Ever since Hans Eysenck questioned the efficacy of psychotherapy in 1952, a number of investi-gators have attempted to offer evidence that psychotherapy is effective and have theorized about the mechanisms responsible for it's success. Some practitioners boldly assert that their specific therapeutic technique underlies the effectiveness of all forms of therapy. For example, Joseph Wolpe, in The Practice of Behaviour Therapy argues that whenever a person benefits from psy-chotherapy, it is because the therapist (usually inadverently ) evokes responses which reciprocally inhibit anxiety.

Subtitled "Cognitive Psychotherapy and the Misconception Hypothesis", Misunderstandings of the Self offers a refreshing look at factors poten-tially responsible for therapeutic change.

Raimy suggests that before psychotherapy can succeed, the therapist must help the client detect and modify those misconceptions, or faulty be-liefs, that are central to the presenting problem. Probably the best known advocate of a "Mis-conception Hypothesis" approach is Albert Ellis, but Raimy's theoretical system encompasses more than Ellis.

The book begins with a detailed discussion of the misconception hypothesis which is stated as: "If those ideas or conceptions of a client or Why be Lonely?, Edward Ford and Robert Zorn,

Niles, Illinois: Argus Communications, 1975, 165 pp. $2.25. Reviewed by: R. Vance Peavy Associate Professor Faculty of Education University of Victoria Victoria, B.C.

The authors describe their book as "an attempt to popularize and explain 'reality therapy' ". From this assertion one may assume that the writers intend that the Why Be Lonely? would be useful to the general or popular reader.

In my opinion, this book is not likely to be read, or, if read, to prove useful to very many

patient which are relevant to his psychological problems can be changed in the direction of greater accuracy where his reality is concerned, his maladjustments are likely to be eliminated, (p. 7). Raimy then goes on to describe four major techniques the therapist can use to help him uncover client misconceptions (explanation, self-examination, self-demonstration, and model-ling). Another chapter is devoted to "repeated cognitive review", or ways in which the client can actively modify faulty beliefs. The approach here is eclectic: as Raimy says, "One of the major theses of this book . . . [is that] there is no one best way to discover and to change mis-conceptions in psychotherapy" (p. 167). To but-tress this point, the book offers an extensive syn-thesis of Raimy's cognitive approach with that of other theorists as varied as: Du Bois, Adler, Combs and Snygg, Ellis, Freud, Rosen, Perls, Berne and Bandura.

Of special interest to the clinical or psychiatric practitioner may be the chapter outlining clusters of misconceptions found to be prevalent in various diagnostic categories including reactive depression, obsessive-compulsive neurosis, hysteria, phobic re-action, and the psychoses. Raimy also identifies two misconceptions which have previously attrac-ted little attention: phrenophobia (the fear that one is losing control of his mind), and the special-person misconception (the belief that one is superi-or to everyone else, suffers msuperi-ore pain and frus-tration than anyone else, and must be in complete control of all phases of life). For the busy reader, the last chapter provides an excellent summary of the previous 184 pages.

Because of its heavy theoretical input, Mis-understandings of the Self is not recommended for the novice. It is a stimulating sourcebook for the well-read, experienced practitioner.

popular readers. (Its usefulness to the professi-onal would seem to be even less apparent.) Briefly, my reasons for doubting the utility of

Why Be Lonely? for the popular reader are as follows.

First, the format of the book is unattractive. The title is printed so that the initial impression of the title is WHY BE? rather than why be LONELY? The text is not supported by illustra-tions of any kind. There are twenty-one figures scattered throughout the text. However, I found them to be in small, difficult to read print and, more importantly, not helpful in clarifying the text. For example, figure 14 purports to sche-matically show how "Building Depth or Strength Into Relationships Works". Besides the fact that

(2)

BOOK REVIEWS/REVUE DE LIVRES 145 a naive reader might simply be puzzled over the

chart, there is the highly questionable maxim that to build strength into a relationship "you do some-thing to please the other regardless of what the other is doing". Come now, what experienced counsellor/therapist would fail to recognize that piece of advice as highly suspect — reinforcing neurotic interaction as frequently as rewarding positive interaction. Hurt me again while I please you!

Chapter three, "Changing the Way We Live" has potential benefit for the reader, especially the "Do" plan. Similarly with Chapter six on "Time and Money". While the treatment of action plan-ning, time and money is not well-developed, these are self-help topics which the popular reader can frequently get benefit from reading and self-analysis.

Chapter ten on "Sex and Loneliness" is a di-saster. Trivia and advice-full, it seems to me to be more mis-directive than guiding.

There are a number of advice formulas which are open to serious questions. Two examples are: "the greatest thrill in sex is when you work to give your partner enjoyment" (p. 116), ". . . both the man and woman should withhold sex initially to see if they are willing to develop the commitment in the relationship" (p. 122). My guess is that the counsellor/therapist who has counselled clients of varying ages and from vari-ous value-systems will find more reasons not to offer such advice than could be found to offer it.

In my estimation reality therapy offers a valued approach to the field of helping and autonomous living. While one may wish for an attractive and useful translation of the precepts and practices of reality therapy for the general reader, in my opinion Why Be Lonely? is not such a translation. It appears to be a hasty compilation of do's and don'ts which may confuse the reader and trivi-alize reality therapy. I do not think this book belongs on the counsellor's shelf of useful biblio-therapy materials.

Références

Documents relatifs

Par contre, les eleves expliquent moins bien les moyens qu'ils utilisent pour verifier diffe- rents aspects de leur texte (voir les exemples presentes a la page 85 des Modeles

As  the  plane  starts  to  descend,  I  experience  a  familiar queasiness, not from  the  swaying  of  the  plane  in  the  crosswinds,  but  from  the 

2 Until a refrigerator-stable vaccine becomes available, however, varicella vac- cine will not be incorporated into the recommend- ed immunization schedule in Canada, as most

However, by my lights, Sankey is mistaken that his most recently proposed view avoids Grzankowski’s second objection, since believing that p is true isn’t logically distinct

This approach has recently resulted [5, 6] in new forms of the conjecture which are in some sense similar to Hilbert’s 17 th problem and are formulated entirely in terms of moments

If a previous execute failed in a way indicating a programming error in the display program (error conditions 6,7 and 8), then an SETUP or an UPDATE request must be

The time and cost for a brute force attack is approximately 2^(16) more than for TripleDES, and thus, under the assumption that 128 bits of strength is the desired security

The problem list has been further analyzed in an attempt to determine the root causes at the heart of the perceived problems: The result will be used to guide the next stage