HAL Id: jpa-00220723
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/jpa-00220723
Submitted on 1 Jan 1981
HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.
L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.
DRIFT TYPE PHOTOVOLTAIC EFFECT IN a-Si p-i-n JUNCTION
H. Okamoto, T. Yamaguchi, S. Nonomura, Y. Hamakawa
To cite this version:
H. Okamoto, T. Yamaguchi, S. Nonomura, Y. Hamakawa. DRIFT TYPE PHOTOVOLTAIC EF- FECT IN a-Si p-i-n JUNCTION. Journal de Physique Colloques, 1981, 42 (C4), pp.C4-507-C4-510.
�10.1051/jphyscol:19814108�. �jpa-00220723�
JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE
CoZZoque
C4,suppZ6ment au nO1O, Tome
42,octobre 1981 page
C4-507D R I F T TYPE PHOTOVOLTAIC EFFECT I N a-Si p-i-n JUNCTION
H. Okamoto, T. Yamaguchi, S. Nonomura and Y. Hamakawa
FacuZty of Engineering
Scielzce,Osaka University, To'oyonaka, Osaka, Japan
A b s t r a c t . - P h o t o v o l t a i c p r o p e r t y and r e l a t e d processes i n an a-Si:H p - i - n j u n c t i o n have been examined by t a k i n g account t h e i n t e r n a l e l e c t r i c f i e l d d i s t r i b u t i o n . Through t h e t h e o r e t i c a l c o n s i d e r a t i o n s combined w i t h experimental data on t h e c o l l e c t i o n e f f i c i e n c y s p e c t r a , quantum e f f i c i e n c y and e f f e c t i v e h o l e d i f f u s i o n l e n g t h have been evaluated t o be a t l e a s t 0.85 f o r fiw>2.leV and 1000A, r e s p e c t i v e l y . An a n a l y s i s has been a l s o made on t h e p h o t o v o l t a i c performance o f an i n v e r t e d p - i - n j u n c t i o n c e l l , and which c o n f i r m s an
e f f i c i e n t p h o t o v o l t a i c o p e r a t i o n n o t so much d i f f e r e n t from a p - i - n j u n c t i o n .
I n t r o d u c t i o n . - A g r e a t deal o f e x t e n s i v e e f f o r t s p a i d on t h e f a b r i c a t i o n technology o f amorphous s i l i c o n s o l a r c e l l s has a l r e a d y r e a l i z e d a conversion e f f i c i e n c y on
t h e p r a c t i c a l l y f e a s i b l e l e v e l [ l ] . Despite, as regards t h e u n d e r l y i n g p h y s i c s o f t h e p h o t o v o l t a i c e f f e c t , any s u f f i c i e n t understandings have n o t been given y e t . The p h o t o c u r r e n t g e n e r a t i o n g e n e r a l l y i n v o l v e s t h r e e b a s i c processes; l i g h t a b s o r p t i o n , p h o t o - c a r r i e r g e n e r a t i o n and c o l l e c t i o n processes[2]. Owing t o a c o n s i d e r a b l y small c a r r i e r m o b i l i t y i n h e r e n t t o amorphous m a t e r i a l s , t h e l a t t e r two processes a r e q u i t e d i f f e r e n t from those f a m i l i a r i n conventional c r y s t a l l i n e semiconductors[3]. That i s , i t has been b e l i e v e d t h a t n o t o n l y geminate recombination has a s i g n i f i c a n t i n f l u e n c e on t h e p h o t o - c a r r i e r g e n e r a t i o n process[4,5] but a l s o non-geminate recorn- b i n a t i o n becomes a s t r o n g o b s t a c l e t o t h e c a r r i e r c o l l e c t i o n [ 6 ] . Moreover, because o f an e x i s t e n c e o f c o n t i n u o u s l y d i s t r i b u t e d gap s t a t e s , t h e j u n c t i o n p r o f i l e and corresponding i n t e r n a l e l e c t r i c f i e l d d i s t r i b u t i o n would be f a r more complicated compared w i t h t h e case i n c r y s t a l 1 i n e j u n c t i o n s [ 7 , 8 ] .
I n t h i s paper, under t h e r e c o g n i t i o n o f these p e c u l i a l i t i e s , an c a r e f u l exa- m i n a t i o n i s made an t h e p h o t o v o l t a i c p r o p e r t y o f amorphous hydrogenated s i l i c o n
(a-Si:H) i n a p - i - n j u n c t i o n s t r u c t u r e through t h e t h e o r e t i c a l c o n s i d e r a t i o n s com- bined w i t h v a r i o u s experimental data. I n t h e course o f these a n a l i s e s , p h y s i c a l parameters r e l a t i n g t o p h o t o - c a r r i e r g e n e r a t i o n and c o l l e c t i o n processes a r e d e t e r mined. The p h o t o v o l t a i c p r o p e r t y i n an i n v e r t e d p - i - n j u n c t i o n c e l l w i l l a l s o
be discussed i n comparison w i t h a p - i - n j u n c t i o n c e l l .
P h o t o v o l t a i c e f f e c t i n a-Si:H D - i - n j u n c t i o n c e l l s . - The p h o t o c u r r e n t J can be expressed as a f u n c t i o n o f t h e photon energy 3, and a p p l i e d v o l t a g e V ~ [ ! ' , ] ] ,
where t h e i n t e g r a t i o n w i t h respect t o t h e p o s i t i o n X i s proceeded w i t h i n t h e range o f an a c t i v e l a y e r ( i - l a y e r ) from x=O t o di. @(x,hw) i s a photon f l u x d i s t r i b u t i o n and i s o b t a i n e d f o r a s e t o f geometrical and o p t i c a l parameters o f l a y e r s composing t h e c e l l . P (x,hw;V ) i s a p h o t o - c a r r i e r g e n e r a t i o n p r o b a b i l i t y , t h a t i s , quantum e f f i c i e n c y For p h o t g - c a r r i e r generat ion. According t o t h e Onsager's t h e o r y , t h i s f a c t o r can be represented i n terms o f t h e i n t e r n a l e l e c t r i c f i e l d E(x;V ) , Onsager r a d i u s r (46A f o r a-Si :H) and a thermal i z a t i o n d i s t a n c e r (3w) o f p h o t g e x c i t e d e l e c t r o n % o l e p a i r s [ 9 ] . While, a p h o t o - c a r r i e r c o l l e c t i o n E r o b a b i l i t y P (x;V ) i s g i v e n as an extended formula o f o u r p r e v i o u s one[3] by assuming a complete sank f o r C
Article published online by EDP Sciences and available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/jphyscol:19814108
JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE
h o l e s a t x=O w h i c h corresponds t o t h e i n t e r f a c e between t h e p- and i - l a y e r ;
r
here, f k ( x ) = e x p [;
J ~ X
L g ' ( ~ ) d f l , qL
gi(x)=&+:(x), y(x)=+ E(x;va)
L denotes an e f f e c t i v e h o l e d i f f u s i o n l e n g t h w h i c h t a k e s i n t o account t h e a m b i p o l a r t e a n s p o r t w i t h a p r o b a b l e i n f l u e n c e o f t r a p s .
As i s e a s i l y accepted, one s h o u l d examine f i r s t l y t h e i n t e r n a l e l e c t r i c f i e l d E(x;Va) i n t h e i - l a y e r w h i c h i s e s s e n t i a l l y c o r r e l a t e d w i t h t h e d e n s i t y o f s t a t e s i n t h e gap because i t would p l a y an i m p r o t a n t r o l e i n d e t e r m i n g t h e p h o t o v o l t a i c p r o p e r t y t h r o u g h t h e p h o t o - c a r r i e r g e n e r a t i o n and c o l l e c t i o n processes. F i g u r e l (a ) and ( b ) d i s p l a y examples o f space charge p ( x ) and i n t e r n a l e l e c t r i c f i e l d d i s t r i b u t i o n E(x;O), r e s p e c t i v e l y o b t a i n e d by s o l v i n g P o i s s o n l s e q u a t i o n w i t h r e a l i s t i c boundary c o n d i t i o n s and p h y s i c a l parameters summerized i n t h e f i g u r e . Here, an e x p o n e n t i a l l y d i s t r i b u t e d gap s t a t e s i s assumed w i t h a minimum gap s t a t e s d e n s i t y g in and c h a r a c - t e r i s t i c energy E [ 1 0 ] . One o f t h e n o t i c e a b l e f e a t u r e s found i n E ( X ; O ~ I S an e x i s t e n c e o f a h i g h i n t e r n a ? e l e c t r i c f i e l d i n excess o f 104v/cm t h r o u g h o u t t h e i - l a y e r i n an a-Si :H p - i - n j u n c t i o n c e l l o f a c t u a l d i m e n s i o n [ l l ] . P h o t o - c a r r i e r g e n e r a t i o n and c o l l e c t i o n p r o b a b i l i t y c o r r e s p o n d i n g t o t h i s E(x;O) a r e demonstrated i n F i g . 2 ( a ) and (b)
,
r e s p e c t i v e l y . From F i g . 2 (b),
a " d r i f t t y p e " p h o t o v o l t a i c b e h a v i o r o f a-Si :H j u n c t i o n s [ 8 1 can be c o n f i r m e d , where a h i g h i n t e r n a l e l e c t r i c f i e l d e f f e c t i v e l y enhances a d r i f t component o f t h e p h o t o c u r r e n t and r e s t r i c s non-geminate r e c o m b i n a t i o n l o s s a r i s e n f r o m a v e r y s m a l l c a r r i e r d i f f u s i o n l e n g t h .F i g u r e 3 ( a ) and ( b ) show v a r i a t i o n s o f t h e i n t e r n a l e l e c t r i c f i e l d E(x;v ) i n t h e i - l a y e r c o r r e s p o n d i n g t o t h o s e o f t h e i - l a y e r t h i c k n e s s and f o r w a r d b i a s v81 t a g e V
,
r e s p e c t i v e l y . These r e s u l t s p u t f o r w a r d a new r e c o g n i t i o n t h a t t h e concept o f d g p l e t i o n r e g i o n c o n s i d e r e d i n c r y s t a l l i n e j u n c t i o n s n o l o n g e r h o l d s good i n t h e case o f a - S i j u n c t i o n s , i n s t e a d , an o v e r a l l change i n E(x,V ) s h o u l d be t a k e n i n t o account i n response t o t h e v a r i a t i o n o f c e l l demension o r beas v01 tage.1
r. = l s o aloo&
-
S O B
-
L.- 2 5 8
( a ) rc= 46 A
-
-
- 1 0 -2
noEg(opt)=t 7 8 e V ( b ) I E ~ - E F ~ = O 8 5 e V I
g
AEF" = 0 6 5 e VI
& E F p = - 0 4 3 e V-
9
I
0 1 0 7 m 3 m 40W SW0W POSITION X ( A )
-P ,-- i
:;.
n-Fig.
2Plots of photo-carrier generation
PG( a ) and collection probability
PC(bl Fig.1 Ezamples of space charge density as parmeters of a t h e m a l i z a t i o n dis- p(z;o) ( a ) m d internal e l e c t r i c f i e l d tance ro and e f f e c t i v e hole diffusion E(z;O)
( b )i n m a-Si:H p-i-n junction. length
LP,respectively.
(a)
0
2
-U @
E 0 3
-
2-
m 2 0 6 0 a 2 0 4 0,-
X g 0 2
5
0
Fig.
3Vaariations of internal e Zectric field
E(x; Va)corresponding t o those o f i-Zcger thickness 4 ( a ) and fomard bias voltage
Va( b ) .
-
Geminate and non-qeminate recombination i n a-Si:H.- I n t h e f o l l o w i n g d i s c u s s i o n , f i r s t l y , t h e p h o t o - c a r r i e r g e n e r a t i o n p r o b a b i l i t y i s assumed t o be constant through-
O S , o u t t h e i - l a y e r i n t h e e x t e n t o f t h e cases encountered i n t h e usual o p e r a t i o n o f an a-Si:H p - i - n j u n c t i o n c e l l o f a c t u a l d i m e n s i o n [ l l ] . Coupling t h e r e s u l t i n Fig.3 w i t h eqs. ( l ) and ( 2 ) , an i - l a y e r t h i c k n e s s dependence o f t h e c o l l e c t i o n e f f i c i e n c y f o r monochromatic l i g h t i s d e r i v e d , which i s i l l u s t r a t e d i n Fig.4 w i t h a parameter o f e f f e c t i v e h o l e d i f f u s i o n l e n g t h L
.
A comparison be- - tween experimental data[2,11] and t h y s c a l c u l a t e d oney i e l d s an e v a l u a t i o n f o r L o f about 1000A. A s i m i i a r - procedure i s a l s o a p p l i e d 8 i t h t h e r e s u l t i n ~ i ~ . 3 ( b ) 50oA t o g e t t h e p h o t o c u r r e n t versus forward b i a s v o l t a g e V
durves. F i g u r e 5 shows these dependencies f o r two a Ob 0; o i oS6 o'8 1 0 d i f f e r e n t i l l u m i n a t i o n wavelengthes w i t h corresponding
I-LAYER THICKNESS dl (pm) experimental data o b t a i n e d i n s e v e r a l e f f i c i e n t p - i -n
fi9.4 Relation b e b e e n an i-
j u n c t i o n c e l l s [ l 2 ] under v a r i o u s b i a s l i g h t c o n d i t i o n s .l a y e r thickness 4 m d
photo-This examination a l s o supports an L o f around 1000A.-rent
J Las a parmeter of
I t i s added here t h a t an experiments1 J - V curve f o re f f e c t i v e h o Z e d i f f u s i o n
a n i ~ l u m i n a t i o n o f f u r t h e r s h o r t w a v e l e k g t ~ l i g h t ~ ~ ~ l dlength $.
n o t be f i t t e d by L o f lOOOA and t h i s m i g h t imply ane f f e c t i v e l o w e r i g g o f LP near t h e p / i i n t e r f a c e . On t h e o t h e r hand, through t h e same way desc-
1.0 3 = 5 5 o o d r i bed i n o u r p r e v i o u s papers [2,3], t h e p h o t o - c a r r i e r g e n e r a t i o n p r o b a b i l i t y ~ ~ ( f i w , E ) can be e s t i m a t e d by
-
a t t r i b u t i n g a discrepancy observed between experimen-0 ,209 - t a l and c a l c u l a t e d c o l l e c t i o n e f f i c i e n c y s p e c t r a t o
> geminate recombination. The r e s u l t i s summerized i n
-
--. -
Fig.6. That i s , z e r o - f i e l d quantum e f f i c i e n c y PG(Tw,O)Lp(A)
0 8 - a 1500 . d e f i n e d by e x p [ - r / r ] e x h i b i t s a sharp r i s e from
b 1200 the photon energychi;her than t h e o p t i c a l gap energy
-
c I O W - Theoryd 900 --- Exper~rnents and exceeds about 0.85 f o r X w > 2 . l e V . Here, a s l i g h t
a e 700 decrease o f PG i n t h e photon energy r e g i o n o f h i g h e r
:2=630bA
than 2.2eV might i n d i c a t e an e x t r a non-geminate t i o n l o s s i n t h e v i c i n i t y o f p / i i n t e r f a c e n o t taken i n t o c o n s i d e r a t i o n i n t h e presentP - i - n j u n c t i o n c e l l . - I n t h i s s e c t i o n , we i n e how a small h o l e d i f f u s i o n l e n g t h would
t h e p h o t o v o l t a i c performance o f an i n v e r t e d
c: l 0 0 0
- d . 900 -Theory c t i o n c e l l where m s t o f photo-holes a r e
t e . 7 0 0
--
Expertrnents, 6,
'Fig.
5Photocurwnt
JLversus fo~Ward bias voltage
VaAPPLIED VOLTAGE va (Y)
e w e s for i ZZwnination wavelengthes
of 6300 and 5500A.g
E l - Layer Thickness =5000h=105-
- .
E
3 .
: i-Layer Thickness
0 2 0.3 ~ ~O.L 0.5 0.6 0.8-
i 2
-v
W .
=
. ( a ) , 'v
=O:
10; I
2000 4000 6 0 0 BOM)
d
( b )POSITION x ( A ) lo30 I&O 2doo 3600 40bo 5000
POSlTlON X ( A )
C4-510 JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE
1.0 I generated near t h e i / n i n t e r f a c e and SO
...
...O' o... ~ , = r o o o ~
O r ,Y
0 8
io6-
5
5 0 4 - t
3 0 2 -
o b l iged t o pass through whole t h e i - l a y e r .
0.9
-
--.-
F i g u r e 7 shows t h e c a l c u l a t e d c o l l e c t i o nno e f f i c i e n c y s p e c t r a f o r v a r i o u s p - i - n and
m
i n v e r t e d p - i - n j u n c t i o n c e l l s . Here, Ae and Aa denote t h e Fermi l e v e l s h i f t s dopingFfn n- and p - l a y e r , r e s p e c t i v e l y .
' These c a l c u l a t i o n s a r e c a r r i e d o u t w i t h r e a l i s t i c c e l l c o n s t r u c t i o n parameters by
-
t a k i n g account o f t h e a b s o r p t i o n losses i nI Moll *l a1
.
p - and n - l a y e r s [ l l ] . As can be seen i n t h eg
W 0 5 - - * - g ( E . 0 ) f i g u r e , an i n v e r t e d p - i - n j u n c t i o n c e l l~ , ( o P I ) ...-o....
Crandall PG(E=Eminl e x h i b i t s an i n f e r i o r p h o t o c u r r e n t t o t h a t
I o f a p - i - n j u n c t i o n c e l l so f a r as a s l i g h t l y 0.4
l'
1.8 2.2 2.6 II
310
' d o p e d i - l a y e r i s employed. However,a s u f -PHOTON ENERGY 3rd ( e V ) f i c i e n t l y doped p - l a y e r would improve t h e p h o t o c u r r e n t o f an i n v e r t e d c e l l , a t l e a s t ,
Fig.6 Phoh-caprier generation Poba-
up t o t h e same degree as i n a p - i - n j u n c t i o nb i l i t ~
P G ( m , E )as a fwzction o f
c e l l . While, o u r p r e l i m i n a r y a n a l y s i s ont a t i o n photon energy a.
J -V curves i n d i c a t e s t h a t an i n v e r t e d p-i - n j u n c k i o t c e l l e s s e n t i a l l y i n v o l v e s a lower f i l l f a c t o r as compared w i t h p - i - n j u n c t i o n c e l l s .
0 ~ ' 4 " 0 5 " 0 6
WAVELENGTH X (pm) 0 7 0.85 and i s enhanced up t o 0.95-0.98 by t h e i n t e r n a l e l e c t r i c f i e l d f o r t h e e x c i t a t i o n photon energy f i g . 7
Conp?apison o f coZlection
h i g h e r than 2.leV. Instead, a probable e x i s t e n c ee ffi'iciency spectra among
o f e x t r a non-geminate recombination i n t h e v i c i n i t yvarious p-i-n and inverted
o f the p / i ' i n t e r f a c e would r e s t r i c t t h e p h o t o v o l -p-i-n junction c e l l s .
t a i c performance o f t h e present a-Si:H p - i - nj u n c t i o n c e l l s . While, an a n a l y s i s on i n v e r t e d p- i - n j u n c t i o n c e l l s c o n f i r m s a s i m i l a r l y e f f i c i e n t o p e r a t i o n , i f w e l l designed, as compared w i t h p - i - n j u n c t i o n c e l l s .
References.
111
TAWADA Y., OKAMOTO H. and HAMAKAWA Y.,Appl. Phys. L e t t . 39 (1981) i n press.[2] OKAMOTO H., YAMAGUCHI T., NONOMURA S . and HAMAKAWA Y.,
~rz.
1 5 t h I n t . Phys.2
Physics o f Semiconductors, Kyoto (1980) 1213.
131 YAMAGUCHI T., OKAMOTO H., NONOMURA S. and HAMAKAWA Y,Jpn. J. Appl. Phys.
20
(1981) suppl.2, 191.
[h] CRAMDAtL R.,Appl. Phys. L e t t .
36
(1980) 607.[51 MORT J.
,
TROUP A., MORGAN M., GRAMMATI CA S.,
KN l GHTS J. C. and LUJ IAN R., Appl.
Phys. L e t t . 38 (1981) 277.
161
BELL R.o.,~ ~ 3 .
Phys. L e t t .37
(1980) 952.173 CHEN I and MORT J., Phys. L e t t .
2
(1980) 952.[81 HAMAKAWA Y . , OKAMOTO H. and NlTTA Y.,Proc. 1 4 t h IEEE P h o t o v o l t a i c S p e c i a l i s t s Conf., San Diego (1980) 1074.
[9] PAI D.M. and ENCK R.C.,Phys. Rev. Rev. 1 1 (1975) 5163.
[IOISHUR M., CZUBATYJ W. and MADAN A., J. ~ o n - c r ~ s t . Sol i d s
35636
(1980) 731.[II]OKAMOTO H., NlTTA Y., YAMAGUCHI T. and HAMAKAWA Y., S o l a r Energy Mat. 2 (1980)313.
[IZITAWADA Y., YAMAGUCH l T., NONOMURA S., HOTTA S., OKAMOTO H. and H A M A K A ~ A Y
.,
Jpn.J. Appl. Phys.
20
(1981) 213.' L~-IOOOA
T A € , , = O73eV ..
-
q-
,,' ,.-p - ,'..-
NORMAL p-I-n .-
I----
INVERTED pinAE~n:065ey