HAL Id: jpa-00224228
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/jpa-00224228
Submitted on 1 Jan 1984
HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.
L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.
INFLUENCE OF THE NUCLEAR ASYMMETRY AND COULOMB FORCE ON THE SURFACE WIDTH OF THE NUCLEAR MASS DENSITIES
D. Berdichevsky
To cite this version:
D. Berdichevsky. INFLUENCE OF THE NUCLEAR ASYMMETRY AND COULOMB FORCE ON
THE SURFACE WIDTH OF THE NUCLEAR MASS DENSITIES. Journal de Physique Colloques,
1984, 45 (C6), pp.C6-221-C6-230. �10.1051/jphyscol:1984626�. �jpa-00224228�
JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE
Colloque C6, supplément au n06, Tome 45, juin 1984 page C6-221
INFLUENCE OF THE NUCLEAR ASYMMETRY AND COULOMB FORCE ON THE SURFACE WIDTH OF THE NUCLEAR MASS D E N S I T I E S
D. Berdichevsky
GSI-Darmstadt, P L m c k s t r . 1, 6100 Darmstadt, F. B. G.
Résumé- Pour l e s noyaux f i n i s , l ' i n f l u e n c e des f o r c e s Coulombienne e t asymétrique s u r l a l a r g e u r de l a s u r f a c e de l a d i s t r i b u t i o n de masse e s t é t u d i é e avec un paramètre de l a s u r f a c e sans t e n i r compte des e f f e t s du volume. Les r e l a t i o n s importantes e n t r e l e s changements dans l a forme des p o t e n t i e l s à un corps e t l a l a r g e u r de l a d i s t r i b u t i o n de masse sont présentées.
A b s t r a c t
-
I n f i n i t e n u c l e i , t h e i n f l u e n c e o f t h e nucleon asymmetry and Coulomb f o r c e on t h e surface w i d t h o f t h e mass d e n s i t i e s i s i n v e s t i g a t e d w i t h a surface w i d t h parameter v o i d o f b u l k e f f e c t s . The r e l e v a n t c o r r e - l a t i o n s between changes i n t h e shape o f t h e s i n g l e p a r t i c l e p o t e n t i a l s and t h e mass s u r f a c e widths a r e given.I t i s w e l l known t h a t t h e Coulomb f o r c e and t h e nucleon asymmetry a r e r e s p o n s i b l e f o r several c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s o f nuclear ground s t a t e p r o p e r t i e s . A few examoles are:
a) t h e d i f f e r e n c e i n t h e s i n g l e p a r t i c l e energies o f protons and neutrons /1/, b ) f o r i s o t o p i c and i s o t o n i c s e r i e s , t h e d e v i a t i o n from t h e A ' ' ~ la, e x h i b i t e d hy t h e d i f f e r e n c e s between n u c l e a r charge mean r a d i i /2/, c ) t h e increase o f t h e nucleon asymmetry w i t h t h e mass number A f o r t h e s t a b l e n u c l e i /3,4/. However, much l e s s i s known about t h e i n f l u e n c e o f t h e Coulomb f o r c e and t h e nucleon asymmetry on t h e surface w i d t h o f t h e mass d e n s i t y p A ( r ) [ p A ( r ) = p n ( r )
+
p,,(r) where p n ( r ) ( p p ( r ) ) i s t h e neutron ( p r o t o n ) d e n s i t y l and t h e neutron excess i n t h e s u r f a c e o f t h e nucleus. These p r o p e r t i e s are i m p o r t a n t f o r t h e d e s c r i p t i o n o f q u a s i s t a t i c / 5 / as w e l l as dynamic processes /6/ and a r e a l s o necessary i n g r e d i e n t s i n a l 1 mass formulae /7/. These mass formulae, however, cannot d e s c r i b e t h e s u r f a c e w i t h o u t addi t i o n a l assumption / 8 / .The i m p o s s i b i l i t y t o o b t a i n a t t h e present time from experiment t h e necessary i n f o r - mation about t h e i n f l u e n c e o f Coulomb f o r c e and nucleon asymmetry on t h e s u r f a c e o f n u c l e a r mass d e n s i t i e s provides t h e m o t i v a t i o n f o r t h e i r d e t a i l e d i n v e s t i g a t i o n w i t h t h e s p h e r i c a l constrained HF+BCS-mode1 /9/.
I n t h e n e x t s e c t i o n we present Our d e f i n i t i o n o f t h e surface w i d t h parameter b /9/
I n s e c t i o n II we discuss i n d e t a i l t h e i n f l u e n c e o f nucleon asymmetry and Coulomb f o r c e on t h e n u c l e a r s u r f a c e width. A s h o r t summary o f Our r e s u l t s i s given i n s e c t i o n III.
1
-
SURFACE WIDTH PARAMETER bI n r e f . 9, i t was shown t h a t t h e experimental mode1 independent (MI) n u c l e a r Charge d e n s i t i e s and t h e t h e o r e t i c a l charge and mass d e n s i t i e s obtained from HF+BCS-calcu- l a t i o n s a r e almost symmetric around t h e e x t e r n a l r a d i u s C ( c e n t r a l r a d i u s ) , where t h e slope o f t h e d e n s i t y p ( r ) i s maximum a t t h e s u r f a c e (see f i g . 1). T h i s symmetry i s f u l f i l l e d f o r a r e g i o n
1
r-
C1
< 0.9-
1.0 fm. I n t h a t r e g i o n t h e d e r i v a t i v e o f t h e symmetrized densi t yArticle published online by EDP Sciences and available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/jphyscol:1984626
JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE
f o r r 2 C p'(2C-r) f o r r < C
i s a very good approximation to. p
'
( r ) . The quantity -p-
' ( r ) possesses the advanta- S geous property of being a d i s t r i b u t i o n function. -p8'(r) i s a l s o f r e e from bu1 k e f f e c t s . F i g . 1 shows t h a t the symmetry expressed by r e l a t i o n (1) i s very f a s t destroyed f o r l a r g e r distances from C.Fig. 1
-
Part ( a ) shows the calculated negative derivative of the proton density- p l ( r ) (thick curve), the distance C from the center of the nucleus t o the surface
point where - p l ( r ) i s maximum, and the symmetrized function - p l S ( r ) defined in eq. 1 ( t h i n curve). Part (b): same as part ( a ) but f o r neutrons.
Ue associate with C , and - p l S ( r ) the surface parameter
/
( r ) ( r - ) d r 2b i s s e n s i t i v e t o the surface region and f r e e from any mode1 assumption regarding the shape of the d e n s i t i e s e i t h e r i n the volume or in the surface region. We employ in the following sections the parameter b f o r a systematic study of the influence of Coulomb force and nucleon asymmetry on the surface width of nuclear mass densi- t i e s .
I I
-
SURFACE WIDTH DEPENDENCE ON COULOMB AND NUCLEON ASYMMETRYNuclei along the valley of 6 - s t a b i l i t y with a mass number 20 6 A 5 244 show an increase in the r a t i o between Coulomb-force (EC) and binding-energy (BI)
with EC = 3/5 c Z ~ / A ( ' / ~ ) , and c = 0.744 MeV (force Ka /IO/) and neutron excess
with I = (N-Z)/A, N(Z)= number of neutrons (protons) and A=N+Z.
The analysis of t h e surface masse widths b (q=n(neutrons), p pro tons)) a s a func- tion of A (nuclei along the valley of 6 - s t a b i l i t y ) allows the determination of f i n e q e f f e c t s originating from the nucleon asymetry ( 1 = O ) , and from the Coulomb- force on the nuclear surface widths b (q=p,n).
q
The trends found i n f i g . 2 f o r the dependence of the nuclear surface widths on t h e mass number A a r e the following
Fi g. 2
-
The proton-(léft) and neutron-widths ( r i g h t ) b from s e l f c o n s i s t e n t HF+BCS-calculations with the force SV (upper most part of t h e f i g u r e ) Ka ( c e n t e r ) , and SI11 (lowest part of the f i g u r e ) f o r nuclei along t h e valley of 6 - s t a b i l i t y are given as a function of neutron number. The b values f o r the isotopes Ca, Ni, Fe, Z n , and Zr a r e joined withd s o l i d l i n e s . The curves emphasize the strong shell structures in bn, bp as a function of N and the s t r a i g h t l i n e s i l l u s t r a t e the decrease of the proton width f o r N 2 82.( 1 ) The widths b and bn deviate in al1 cases l e s s than
-
4% from the average Pwidths b and bn (see t a b l e 1 ) . P
C6-224 JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE
Table 1. Coulumns 2 t i l l 4 g i v e t h e average nuclear charge surface w i d t h bc ( l i n e l), and t h e maximal d e v i a t i o n dbc/bC ( l i n e 2 ) c a l c u l a t e d w i t h t h e f o r c e s S I I I , Ka, and SV. The p r o t o n values b and ~ b neutron values bn and abn, and mass bA and abA a r e
P P '
given from l i n e 3 t o 8.
These c a l c u l a t i o n s were c a r r i e d o u t f o r 25 n u c l e i along t h e v a l l e y o f 6 - s t a b i l i t y w i t h a nucleon number 20 =< A 2 244.
( I I ) There i s a small r e d u c t i o n o f t h e p r o t o n w i d t h (t 2%) w i t h i n c r e a s i n g number o f nucleons A ( f o r N 2 82, i.e. A 5 160).
( I I I ) There are s h e l l s t r u c t u r e s i n t h e neutron w i d t h bn as a f u n c t i o n o f A w i t h nronounced minima f o r N = 20, 28, 50, and 82. T h i s r e s u l t a g r e e s w i t h t h e p r e d i c t i o n o f r e f . 11.
( I V ) The very non-local f o r c e SV /1/ p r e d i c t s s t r o n g e r staggerings i n bn and b P.
(V) The very non-local f o r c e SV p r e d i c t s [ a f t e r d i s r e g a r d i n g t h e s t a g g e r i n g e f f e c t s i n t h e surface w i d t h bn and bn] an almost equal w i d t h f o r p r o t o n and neutron i n c o n t r a s t t o t h e increase o f t L e d i f f e r e n c e between t h e neutron and p r o t o n widths w i t h i n c r e a s i n g nucleon asymmetry 1 w i t h t h e f o r c e s Ka / I O / and SI11 /1/.
( V I ) The f o r c e s S I I I , Ka, and SV show f o r t h e Ca and N i i s o t o p e a d i f f e r e n t
dependence o f t h e p r o t o n and neutron w i d t h b and b, w i t h i n c r e a s i n g neutron excess.
P
11.1
-
INFLUENCE OF NEUTRON EXCESS AND COULOMB FORCE ON THE PROTONS AND NEUTRONS SURFACE WIDTH OF ISOBARIC NUCLEIdie f i n d , a f t e r d i s r e g a r d i n g f o r c e SV, an increase o f t h e d i f f e r e n c e
w i t h A f o r n u c l e i along t h e v a l l e y of 6 - s t a b i l i t y (see f i g . 2 ) . The nucleon asymmetry 1 and t h e r a t i o between t h e Coulomb-energy and t h e binding-energy grows w i t h i n c r e a s i n g A. I n t h e f o l l o w i n g paragraphs we i n v e s t i g a t e t h e e f f e c t o f asymmetry and Coulomb f o r c e on t h e s u r f a c e mass widths b (q=n,p).
'4
For a b e t t e r i n t e r p r e t a t i o n o f t h e asymmetry e f f e c t s on t h e s u r f a c e w i d t h o f t h e n u c l e i ? we f i r s t i n v e s t i g a t e i s o b a r i c n u c l e i a f t e r s w i t c h i n g o f f t h e Coulomb-force.
The study o f isobars w i t h A
>
40 shows an increase o f t h e neutron w i d t h bn w i t h i n c r e a s i n g asymmetry, w h i l e b does n o t change very much (see f i g s . 3a, 4a). This e f f e c t i s responsible f o r an increase o f the neutron s k i n /12/ PL L
70 60 50 70 60 50
1 2
1 OB 108
1 104 IO4 I I
A
1 O0 1 O0
y 0 9 6 O 96
-
-
B - 1 0
O 9 2 0 9 2
=
E0
O 88 O 88
O 81 0 8 1 09
Fig. 3
-
P a r t ( a ) shows, f o r the i s o b a r i c n u c l e iw i t h A=208 ( c a l c u l a t i o n w i t h t h e f o r c e Ka), t h e -N -N
proton surface w i d t h b (8) and neutron s u r f a c e Fig. 4
-
Same as f i g . 3 b u t f o r Pw i t h bn(a) as a f u n c t i o n o f t h e neutrons number Z the isobaric with A=140' (upper s c a l e ) . MIN i n d i c a t e s t h e a b s o l u t e minimum
f o r b as a f u n c t i o n o f N. P a r t ( b ) : same as p a r t P
( a ) b u t w i t h Coulomb-force.
C6-226 JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE
w i t h t h e asymmetry 1 = (N-Z)/A. A c l o s e r a n a l y s i s shows, t h a t the a s y m e t r y f o r c e acts on t h e depth and w i d t h o f t h e proton and neutron s i n a l e - p a r t i c l e o o t e n t i a l s (see t a b l e 2 ) . The nucleon asymmetry (asymmetry f o r c e ) oroduces w i t h i n c r e a s i n g 1 a decrease o f t h e depth and an increase o f t h e s u r f a c e w i d t h o f t h e neutron s i n g l e - p a r t i c l e p o t e n t i a l . For protons, i t a l s o produces an increase o f t h e s u r f a c e w i d t h o f t h e p r o t o n s i n g l e - p a r t i c l e o o t e n t i a l and, as expected, a l s o a deeper p r o t o n p o t e n t i a l .
Table 2. T h i s t a b l e g i v e s t h e f o l l o w i n g c h a r a c t e r i s t i c p r o p e r t i e s o f t h e s e l f c o n - s i s t e n t s i n g l e p a r t i c l e o o t e n t i a l s c a l c u a l t e d w i t h t h e f o r c e Ka:
a) The h i g h o f t h e Coulomb-barrier h (column C 4). (b) The average depth o f t h e
P
v
proton s i n g l e p a r t i c l e p o t e n t i a l V (column 5 ) and i t s s u r f a c e w i d t h b (column 6)
P P
( c ) The average depth of t h e neutron s i n g l e p a r t i c l e p o t e n t i a l Vn and i t s surface w i d t h bn (column 7 ) .
v
OC (mC) (column 1 ) denotes t h e r e s u l t obtained i n s e l f c o n s i s t e n t c a l c u l a t i o n s w i t h o u t ( w i t h ) t h e Coulomb-force. The mass number A i s g i v e n i n column 2 and o f neutrons i n column 3.
We i n v e s t i g a t e w i t h t h e WS-potential t h e i n f l u e n c e o f t h e f o l l o w i n g two extreme cases on t h e increase o f bn.
(a) t h e neutron s i n g l e - p a r t i c l e p o t e n t i a l ( c e n t r a l p a r t ) i s t h e same f o r a l 1 i s o b a r i c n u c l e i (A=208) and t h e occupation number i s changing from N=104 t o N=138.
[The r a t i o between t h e e f f e c t i v e mass and t h e nucleon mass m*/m=0.61 i s chosen i n order t o perform a q u a n t i t a t i v e comparison w i t h s e l f c o n s i s t e n t c a l c u l a t i o n s using the f o r c e Ka. The WS-potential i s f i t t e d i n i t s depth and s u r f a c e w i d t h t o t h e c a l c u l a t i o n w i t h t h e f o r c e Ka f o r t h e nucleus 208 104X. The s p i n - o r b i t c o u p l i n g constant was chosen i n order t o g i v e t h e same s i n g l e p a r t i c l e occupation as i n t h e s e l f c o n s i s t e n t c a l c u l a t i o n s .
(b) We change depth and surface w i d t h o f t h e c e n t r a l p o t e n t i a l f o r a system w i t h a f i x e d occupation number(N=104).The p o t e n t i a l changes are chosen i n order t o cover t h e v a r i a t i o n i n t h e s e l f c o n s i s t e n t p o t e n t i a l o f t h e i s o b a r i c n u c l e i w i t h A=208 when t h e neutron number changes from N=104 t o N=138.
We f i n d t h a t t h e increase o f bn w i t h growing asymmetry 1 can be described as t h e e f f e c t o f two causes. One o f them i s t h e "cooperative" a c t i o n o f a l 1 o a r t i c l e s t o decrease t h e depth and increase t h e s u r f a c e w i d t h o f t h e neutron s i n g l e - p a r t i c l e
r
p o t e n t i a l . The o t h e r i s caused by t h e approach o f t h e Fermi-energie E: t o t h e zero value w i t h i n c r e a s i n g neutron number. Both causes c o n t r i b u t e almost e q u a l l y t o t h e growth o f t h e neutron d e n s i t y surface w i d t h bn when t h e neutron number N goes from 104 t o 138 (see f i g s . 5a and 6 ) .
Fig. 5
-
The dependence of t h e mass s u r f a c e w i d t h on t h e shape o f the s i n g l e p a r t i c l e p o t e n t i a l i s shown. P a r t ( a ) . Each o f t h e t h i n curves gives t h e neutron surface w i d t h bWS as a f u n c t i o n o f t h e US-parameter Vn WS (MeV) ( P o t e n t i a l depth) f o r one value ':i ( p o t e n t i a l surface w i d t h ) , and f i x e d valuecBS
( p o t e n t i a l s i z e ) , and f i x e d neutrons number N. The neutron c e n t r a l 9 o t e n t i a l i sWS WS
ws
WSVn(r)=-Vn /Cl+expl (r-Cn )/z, 11. The t h i c k curve g i v e s t h e neutron s u r f a c e b,
as a f u n c t i o n of and , z:' where
v:'
and znS a r e f i t t e d t o reproduce t h e chanping s e l f c o n s i s t e n t depth and s u r f a c e w i d t h o f t h e neutron p o t e n t i a l as a f u n c t i o n o f t h e nucleon asymmetry f o r i s o b a r i c n u c l e i w i t h A=208 and neutron number changing from N=104 t o 138. P a r t ( b ) : same as p a r t ( a ) b u t f o r protons, and t h e t h i c k curve g i v e s t h e dependence o f bWS on t h e p r o t o n number Z, when i t changes from Z=104 t o 70.P
We performed the same a n a l y s i s , w i t h o u t Coulomb force, f o r t h e p r o t o n surface w i d t h bD o f t h e i s o b a r i c nuclei(A=208)with an o c c u ~ a t i o n number changing from Z=104 t o 70.
C6-228 JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE
Fig. 6 shows t h a t the decrease o f t h e Fermi-energy
EL
from -8 MeV t o -16 MeV (no change i n t h e oarameters o f t h e WS-ootential) a l h e produces a r e l a t i v e l y small e f f e c t on t h e p r o t o n surface w i d t h b This small i n f l u e n c e on b coming from t h eP. P
s t r o n g v a r i a t i o n i n E~ appears s i m i l a r t o t h e one already found i n r e f . 12 between
P WS
the change i n t h e s i z e o f the c e n t r a l o o t e n t i a l w e l l ( l a r n e r parameter C ) and i t s e f f e c t on t h e s u r f a c e w i d t h bu f o r t h e Ca-isotopes. I f we d i s r e g a r d s h e l l e f f e c t s b o t h r e s u l t s a r e e q u i v a l e h t . The change i n t h e occupation number i s respon-
-
s i b l e f o r a s t r o n g decrease i n
EL
and the f i x e d c e n t r a l p o t e n t i a l becomes ' l a r g e r "f o r t h e remaining p a r t i c l e s . [ ~ e r e the word l a r n e means t h a t t h e s i z e o f t h e r e - s u l t i n g p r o t o n p o t e n t i a l i s l a r g e r than t h e one corresponding t o t h e s t a b l e isotope].
But t h a t i s e q u i v a l e n t t o m a i n t a i n t h e number o f p a r t i c l e s constant and t o increase WS
the s i z e o f the p o t e n t i a l ( l a r g e r WS-parameter C ). I n t h a t case t h e small changes o f t h e p r o t o n d e n s i t y surface w i d t h bu (see f i g . 6a) r e s u l t from t h e compensation
7
o f two opposite e f f e c t s : a) t h e decrease o f t h e Fermi-energy
EL
which tends t o decrease bD, and b) a smoother and more extended shape o f t h e have f u n c t i o n s a t t h e nuclear surface which tends t o i n c r e a s e bp. Thus, t h e s u r f a c e w i d t h bp depends mainly on t h e "cooperative" a c t i o n o f a l l ' p a r t i c l e s t o increase t h e depth and surface w i d t h o f t h e o r o t o n s i n g l e - p a r t i c l e o o t e n t i a l (see t a b l e 2). While t h e i n c r e a s i n o depth o f t h e p o t e n t i a l w i t h growing nucleon asymmetry 1 i s r e s p o n s i b l e f o r a decrease o f the surface w i d t h b t h e increase i n t h e surface w i d t h of t h e s i n g l e p a r t i c l e p o t e n t i a l tends t o i n c r e a s e t h e p r o t o n d e n s i t y s u r f a c e w i d t h b P' The r e s u l t i s again a r e l a t i v e small v a r i a t i o n i n b (see f i g . 5b). P.P
Fig. 6
-
The dependence o f t h e mass surface w i d t h on t h e Fermi-energy E~ 'when t h e shape o f t h e s i n g l e p a r t i c l e p o t e n t i a l i s n o t the two curves q i v e s b, [ t r i a n g l e s ] (bn [ c i r c l e s l ) as a
(neutrons) number Z ( N ) . The parameters
cWS,
zWS, andvbJS
o f t h e two WS-potentialsI I 2 l 1 I I I I I I I I
a) A=208 0 N I bl A = 208
- -
- 4- - V " ' = S ~ L M ~ V . us= - 0 3 8 fmy - - - v ~ : ~ ~ o M ~ v . us= -039frnz
O P O Q
-
W B O Q >-12 f
- b * d
are given t o g e t h e r w i t h t h e s p i n - o r b i t courilino constant us, where
uWS
(S.O.) =u S / r d v w Z ( r ) / d r .
-
3p'b
H
-
i 21%2f'b 3p%
-
- b * d
4' l h ' 4 Ih*
I I l I I I I i I l~
P a r t ( b ) . Each o f t h e curves gives on t h e r i g h t scale t h e Fermi eneraies E:
r-
-16
[ t r i a n g l e s ] ( € 1 EoDen c i r c l e s l ) as a f u n c t i o n o f t h e protons (neutrons) number Z(N).
7
IOL 120
db
136 72,,\
88 IO4 136--
z * Z "O F.'bN
-
N-
For comparison, t h e s e l f c o n s i s t e n t neutron Fermi -1evel s E; a r e i n c l u d e d ( f u l l c i r c l e s ) .
The Coulomb f o r c e a c t s upon t h e surface w i d t h bu. I t a l s o m o d i f i e s bn as a conse- quence o f t h e dependence o f t h e s i n g l e - p a r t i c l e ' p o t e n t i a l on t h e t o t a l mass-, moment-, and s p i n - d e n s i t i e s /13/.
For a d e s c r i p t i o n o f t h e e f f e c t o f t h e Coulomb-force on t h e s u r f a c e w i d t h
ba (q=p,n) i t i s u s e f u l t o d i s t i n g u i s h between p r o t o n - r i c h and n e u t r o n - r i c h n u c l e i .
~ g l l o w i n ~ t h e usual convention, p r o t o n - r i c h n u c l e i a r e s i t u a t e d a t t h e l e f t s i d e o f t h e Gamow's v a l l e y and n e u t r o n - r i c h a r e s i t u a t e d a t t h e r i g h t side. Figs. 3,4 show t h a t t h e Coulomb-force i s r e s p o n s i b l e f o r a l i g h t increase o f b P (
-
2% f o r140ce, and 2 3% f o r 2 0 8 ~ b ) and a n e g l i g i b l e change o f t h e neutron s u r f a c e w i d t h b, f o r t h e s t a b l e n u c l e i . Toward p r o t o n - r i c h n u c l e i b increases
P abp/bp = 7-8% f o r A=140(N=70), 208(N=104) wi t h
ab = [b ( w i t h Coulomb)
-
b ( w i t h o u t Cou1omb)lP P P
The e f f e c t o f the Coulomb-force on t h e p r o t o n w i d t h b, decreases toward n e u t r o n - r i c h n u c l e i . For t h e n e u t r o n - r i c h n u c l e i Our c a l c u a t i o n als; shows a r e d u c t i o n o f t h e neutron w i d t h w i t h respect t o the HF-calculated value w i t h o u t Coulomb-force. The presence o f t h e Coulomb-barrier a t t h e surface o f t h e p r o t o n c e n t r a l p o t e n t i a l i s r e s p o n s i b l e f o r a r e s t r a i n e d increase o f t h e p r o t o n surface w i d t h b when t h e
P
Fermi-energy cF approaches t h e zero value /14/. This e f f e c t must a l s o be considered f o r t h e very n g u t r o n - r i c h n u c l e i (see t a b l e 2).
I I I
-
SUMMARYThe proton s u r f a c e w i d t h parameter bD shows minor changes ( 1 3%) as a f u n c t i o n o f t h e nucleon asymmetry. The neutron s u r f a c e w i d t h bn shows a steady increase w i t h t h e neutron excess. T h i s increase gets f a s t e r f o r v e r y n e u t r o n - r i c h n u c l e i .
The d i f f e r e n t changes o f the corresponding s i n g l e p a r t i c l e p o t e n t i a l s w i t h i n c r e a s i n g neutron excess a r e m a i n l y r e s p o n s i b l e f o r t h e d i f f e r e n c e s between neutron and p r o t o n s u r f a c e w i d t h as a f u n c t i o n o f t h e nucleon asymrnetry 1 . The decrease o f t h e depth and increase o f t h e s u r f a c e w i d t h o f t h e neutron s i n g l e - p a r t i c l e p o t e n t i a l c o n t r i - bute t o t h e increase o f t h e neutron s u r f a c e w i d t h bn w i t h growing asymmetry 1. The increase o f bn i s f u r t h e r enhanced because o f t h e approach o f t h e Fermi-energy
-
(chemical p o t e n t i a l )
EL
t o zero. The depth of t h e p r o t o n s i n g l e p a r t i c l e p o t e n t i a l increases w i t h growing asymmetry 1. That i m p l i e s a decrease i n bu. This e f f e c t i n t h e surface w i d t h bu i s compensated by t h e i n c r e a s i n g s u r f a c e w i d t h o f t h e p r o t o n p o t e n t i a l .The Coulomb f o r c e i s r e s p o n s i b l e f o r a l i g h t increase o f b ( = 2% f o r 140ce) f o r P
n u c l e i along t h e v a l l e y o f P s t a b i l i t y . T h i s increase i s l a r g e r f o r very proton- r i c h n u c l e i ( = 7% f o r 140yb).
I n f i g . 2 s h a r p increases o f bn when the neutrons number N gets l a r g e r than 20, 28, 50, and 82 a r e m a i n l y due t o t h e approach o f t h e neutron Fermi-energies
E~ t o t h e z e r o t h value
(SE
= 4 MeV). Because o f t h e Coulomb-barrier hC t h e p r o t o nn F P
surface w i d t h bp i s much l e s s s e n s i t i v e t o ep
.
C6-230 JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE
F i n a l l y we would l i k e t o note t h a t j u s t a f t e r completion o f t h i s work we have become aware o f a p u b l i c a t i o n by L i p p a r i n i and S t r i n g a r i /15/ i n which t h e depen- dence o f t h e s u r f a c e w i d t h on t h e nucleon asymmetry 1 i s i n v e s t i g a t e d i n t h e frame work o f t h e l i q u i d d r o p l e t model.
Me g r a t e f u l l y acknowledge many h e l p f u l and s t i m u l a t i n g discussions w i t h Prof. U. Mosel ( U n i v e r s i t y Giessen) and Dr. K.-H. Schmidt (GSI Darmstadt).
References
1. BEINER M., FLOCARD H., VAN GIA1 N., and QUENTIN P., Nucl. Phys. =(1975)296 2. BAIRD P.E.G. e t a l . , J. Phys. B16(1983)2485
3. WAPSTRA A.H. and BOS K., .At. D a t a and Nucl. Data Tables 19(1977)175 4. BOHR A. and MOTTELSON B., Nucl. S t r u c t u r e 1, W.A. BenjamK New York, 1969 5. VINAS, F.J., LOZANO M., and MADURGA G., Phys. Rev. C23(1981)780
6. KRIVINE H., TREINER J., and BOHIGAS O., Nucl. P h y s . x 3 6 ( 1 9 8 0 ) 1 5 5
7. MARIPUU S., 1975 Mass P r e d i c t i o n s , At. Data and Nat.lcu Tables - 17(1976)411 8. N0LLER P. and NIX J.R., Nucl. Phys. A361(1981)117
9. BERDICHEVSKY D. and MOSEL U., Nucl. Phys. A388(1982)205
10. KOHLER H.S., Nucl. Phys. A258(1976)301 -
11. TONDEUR F., Proceedings o r n e I n t e r n a t i o n a l Summer School h e l d i n La Rabida (Huelva), Spain, June 7-18, 1982, Springer-Verlag, B e r l i n Heidelberg, 1982 12. BERDICHEVSKY D., t h e s i s Giessen, 1982
13. VAUTHERIN D. and BRINK D.M., Phys. Rev.
-
C5(1972)626 14. SAUER G., J. Phys. G3(1977)108515. LIPPARINI E. and STRfNGARI S., i n Proceedings o f t h e Topical Meeting on Nucl.
F l u i d Dynamics, I n t e r n a t i o n a l Centre f o r T h e o r e t i c a l Physics, T r i e s t e , 11.-15.
October 1982, IAEA-SMR-108, Wien, A u s t r i a