• Aucun résultat trouvé

Overview of methods

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Overview of methods"

Copied!
10
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

SegTHOR challenge:

Segmentation of THoracic Organs at Risk in CT images - Part II

Caroline Petitjean, Zoé Lambert, Su Ruan

IEEE ISBI April 8th, 2019

(2)

Overview of methods

Inblue, participants that presented their method today:

Rank Authors nD

1 Miaofei Han 3D Vnet, Multiresolution, generalized Dice loss 2 Tao He 2.5D Unet, Multitask

5 Qin Wang 3D Vnet, Multiscale

9 S Vesal 2D Unet, Dilated res Training in 2 steps Tversky loss 13 L van Harten 2/3D Combining 2D and 3D CNN

16 D Lachinov 3D Unet, Pixel shuffle, Dice loss 18 Ming Feng 3D Dense VNet, DicePlusXEnt loss 20 Li Zhang 3D 2 stage approach

21 Pan Chen 3D Unet, multiresolution

26 Kondratenko 2/3D Unet (Tnet), surface dice score

32 Sekeun Kim 2/3D Selection network, and 3 parallel Thor-net, Xent loss 47 Manoj Satya 2D Dilated UNet applied independently on each organ

2 / 10

(3)

Challenge results

Results on the 50 test set submissions Results with the 12 participants

(4)

Challenge results: average Dice scores for all 50 participants

4 / 10

(5)

Challenge results: average HD (mm) for all 50 participants

(6)

Average Dice metric for 12 participants: esophagus & heart

6 / 10

(7)

Average Dice metric for 12 participants: trachea and aorta

(8)

Comparing to baseline work

Baseline work Top-1 method Esophagus 0.67-0.71 0.86

Heart 0.90 0.95

Trachea 0.82-0.83 0.92

Aorta 0.86 0.94

Results not obtained on the SegTHOR dataset!

Substantial improvement in segmentation accuracy has been obtained by many participants!

8 / 10

(9)

Analysis and future works

What we’ve learnt:

Segmentation CNN: definitely the state-of-the-art!

2D vs 3D vs a mix?

Loss functions: Dice, Cross-Entropy, others?

Post-processing: a necessary step?

Esophagus and trachea: still room for improvement?

What we need to do now:

Assess variability of manual segmentation

Compute statistical significance between methods 2D metrics 3D metrics?

(10)

What’s next?

Our presentations will be soon online Proceedings will be soon online

Test results will re-open on April 10th and remain open Write a collaborative paper with in-depth result analysis

Acknowledgements...

to all participants! especially those who submitted a paper, to ISBI Workshop and Challenge chairs and co-chairs

Contact: [email protected]

https://competitions.codalab.org/competitions/21012

10 / 10

Références

Documents relatifs

Identifier chacun d’entre

Identifier chacun d’entre

cross-validated Expression Recognition Accuracy (RA) employing [55] 3D Fitting Method (FM) on the 3D face region of COMA [22] that has been.. regularly reduced by a Sparsity

As a result, pieces of information related to the evolution of artefacts are available through various visual disposals - in 2D or 3D depending on the amount

By mean of assuming that the resolution of the LED display is 3840 x 2160, then the parallax of the viewpoint image rendered by the two pixel mapping methods is respectively as

Critical roles of phosphorylation and actin binding motifs, but not the central proline-rich region, for Ena/vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP) function during

de plus en plus proche du problème qui nous intéresse : la simulation numérique d'un modèle de ruissellement d'eau de pluie.. La première partie de ce stage est consacrée au système

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des