• Aucun résultat trouvé

Master 2 Leader Election in a Sensor Networks (Exercises)

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Master 2 Leader Election in a Sensor Networks (Exercises)"

Copied!
1
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Master 2

Leader Election in a Sensor Networks (Exercises)

Franck Petit

We will investigate the Leader Election Problem in a sensor network. We will come up with the following question: “Given a set of sensors scattered on the plane where no two sensors are located at the same position, what are the (minimal) geometric conditions to be able to deterministically agree on a single sensorL, called the leader?”

The sensors are assumed to be uniform and anonymous, i.e., they all execute the same program using no local parameter (such that a visual identity) allowing to differentiate any of them. However, we assume that each sensor is a computational unit having the ability to determine the positions of then sensors within an infinite decimal precision. We assume no kind of communication medium. Each sensor has its own localx-y Cartesian coordinate system defined by two coordinate axes (xand y), together with their orientations, identified as the positive and negative sides of the axes.

Question 1. Given n≥2 sensors scattered on the plane, is it always possible to elect a leader Lif the sensors share the same coordinate system? If the answer is “yes”, then provide a distributed algorithm and prove it.

Otherwise, show a counter-example. Deduce a theorem from the answer.

Question 2. Same questions as for Question 1 assuming that the sensors share the same oriented direction and the same handedness (chirality).

Question 3. Same questions as for Question 1 assuming that the sensors share the oriented direction of a common axis only.

Question 4. With the same settings as for Question 3, can we refine the result with respect ton? If the answer is “yes”, then provide a distributed algorithm whenever it make sense. Otherwise, prove your result.

Question 5. Same questions as in Question 1 assuming that the sensors have no sense of direction (i.e., they share no common axis) but share the same handedness.

Question 6. Same questions as in Question 1 assuming that the sensors have no sense of direction and no chirality.

Question 7. Same questions as in Question 6 (with the same settings) assuming thatn <4.

[email protected]

1

Références

Documents relatifs

Among the Indo-European contributors to the non-inherited Greek lexicon, we tentatively identify a language that shares phonetic and morphological features with

Thus, warfarin and quercetin neither share the same binding region, nor is the binding region of one ligand situated in front of the other (Figure 3D), but rather a formation of

The study of the partitions which minimize the sum of anisotropic perimeters is even more challenging, since the optimal partition depends on the norm ϕ.. This motivates the interest

Considérons un fil électrique de haute-tension, isolé, situé à proximité d’un champ magnétique. Le passage du courant à l’intérieur du fil provoque une génération de chaleur

Les dimensions de la plaque sont : largeur l=15cm, longueur L=25cm et épaisseur e=1cm (voir figure ci-dessous). La plaque est placée verticalement dans l’air au repos à

Déterminer le coefficient de transfert de chaleur global U, puis les coefficients de transfert de chaleur moyen côté fluide chaud et côté fluide froid... 5

(Réponse) (1.5 points pour le calcul de a et des résistances, 0.5 point pour le résultat numérique).. 2) L’équation de diffusion de la chaleur régit la distribution de

The ratio of the sample to reference is used to measure absorbance and account for other variations.. This approach will account for variations in detector and source response