R ENDICONTI
del
S EMINARIO M ATEMATICO
della
U NIVERSITÀ DI P ADOVA
K ARL H. W EHRHAHN Projectivities in finite p-groups
Rendiconti del Seminario Matematico della Università di Padova, tome 48 (1972), p. 1-13
<http://www.numdam.org/item?id=RSMUP_1972__48__1_0>
© Rendiconti del Seminario Matematico della Università di Padova, 1972, tous droits réservés.
L’accès aux archives de la revue « Rendiconti del Seminario Matematico della Università di Padova » (http://rendiconti.math.unipd.it/) implique l’accord avec les conditions générales d’utilisation (http://www.numdam.org/conditions).
Toute utilisation commerciale ou impression systématique est constitutive d’une infraction pénale. Toute copie ou impression de ce fichier doit conte- nir la présente mention de copyright.
Article numérisé dans le cadre du programme Numérisation de documents anciens mathématiques
http://www.numdam.org/
PROJECTIVITIES
IN FINITEp-GROUPS
KARL H. WEHRHAHN
*)
In
[2]
theprojectivity
groups ofquotients
in a finite abelianp-group were determined
z[ 2 ] ,
theorem5.13).
In thepresent
paper,we
study projectivity
groups and certainimportant subgroups
of pro-jectivity
groups in finite p-groups. Inparticular
theorem 5.13[2]
isgeneralized
to include the case of abelianquotients
in a non-abelian p-group. The notational conventions of~[ 2 ]
are usedthroughout
thispaper. The
commutatorsubgroup
of a group H will be denotedby
H’.1.
Analogues
of Position.The notion of
position
of aquotient
was defined in[2],
defini-tion
4.2,
forquotients
in an abelian p-group. In this section wegive
two characterizations of this notion which have
applications
in moregeneral
situations.DEFINITION 1.1.
Suppose A/B
is an abelianquotient
in thep-group G. Define
LEMMA 1.2.
Suppose A/B
is aquotient
in the abelian p-group G and that G has type(~1 ,
...,Xk).
ThenPG(AIB)=t
if andonly
iftG(A/B) = pat and ~t ~,t-, .
*) Indirizzo dell’A.: Department of Mathematics, University of Calgary, Cal-
gary, 44, Alberta, Canada.
PROOF.
Suppose
first thatPG(A/B = t
and letA /B
havetype (111,
...,lit). /~.t-1 ~ ~t-1 ~ ~t ,
sincePo(A/B) = t,
and hence it sufficesto show that
tciA/ B) = pÀt. By
definition 1.1 there exist elementsC/De{A/B]
andFCMG(AIB)
with theproperty
thatexp F /F(1) =
= tG(A/B),
whereF(1)=(E’, D } = D
andE = ( F, C } . By
theorem 4.5(i), [2],
Hence
Ux~ (F)5F n C=D
and we haveOn the other hand
by corollary 5.6, [2] A/B
isprojective
to aquotient C/D,
whereC n ~ z ~ =1
for some element z E G of orderet
Hence
tG(A/B) b p’t
andby ( 1 ), tG(AIB)=et Conversely,
lettG(A/B)=
=¡ft,
where~,t ~t-1. By
thepreceding argument,
ifPG(A/B) = s
thentG(A/B)=pÀ8.
ThereforeÀs=Àt
andPG(A/B}= t
since~,t ~,r-1 .
EXAMPLE 1.3. As an
illustration,
suppose G is the group gener- atedby
elements and ysubject
to the relationsIf
A/B
is anycyclic quotient
of G oforder p2
thentc(A/B) ~ p
sincethe center of G is
elementary
abelian of ordert~.
Hencetc(A/B)=p
as otherwise G would possess an abelian
quotient
of orderp4.
The
following
two resultsprovide
necessary conditions for abelianquotients
in a p-group to beprojective.
LEMMA 1.4.
Suppose
G is a p-group andA/B
is an abelianquotient
in G withtG(A/B)=prJ..
IfC/D
is aquotient
in G and(A/B...:,. C/D)
is aprojection
up thenPROOF. Write
A1=(A, C’ )
andR1=(B, C’ )
and denoteby X
thequotient X /C’
for allsubgroups
X of C which contain C’.By
definition1.1 there exists a
quotient E/F
inC projective
to andH E Mc(~/~)
such that
By
lemma5.10, [2] ElFcAilBi.
Clearly H/F
isisomorphic
toH/F
andH e MG(E/F).
HenceSuppose
andthat C
hastype (Xi,
...,~k).
Ifthen
by
lemma 1.2 Henceby
theorem 4.5(i), ~[ 2 ]
and(1)
we haveUu(11)=U«(C)
from which the lemma follows.THEOREM 1.5.
Suppose
G denotes a p-group andA/B
is an abe-lian
quotient
in G with Let IfC/D
is aquotient
in Gprojective
toA/B
thenand
PROOF. It suffices to treat the case when
C/D)
is aprojection
up. Assertion(i)
is an immediate consequence of lemma 1.4.Also
by
lemma 1.4Hence
and
(ii)
holds.Unlike the case for abelian p-groups, the converse of theorem 1.5 is not true. As an
example,
let G be the directproduct
of groups Qand H where
Q=(x,
andand take
A/B = ~ x ), C/D = ~ y ).
Then conditions(i)
and(ii)
of theo-rem 1.5 hold
but ~ x ) and ~ y )
are notprojective.
tG(A/B)
is not defined for non-abelianquotients.
However thefollowing
relatedquantity
allows us to obtain several moregeenral
results.
DEFINITION 1.6. Let F and D be
subgroups
of a p-group G.Write exp for all If
A/B
andC/D
are
quotients
in G writeIf
A/B
is an abelianquotient
thensd[AIB]
may be
strictly greater
thantG(AIB).
Forexample,
chooseA/B= ( y )
in
example
1.3.LEMMA 1.7.
Suppose
that G is an abelian p-group andA/B
isa
quotient
in G. ThenPROOF. Let
tG(A/B) = p°‘
and supposeC/D
is anyquotient
in Gprojective
toA/B.
IfC1/D1el[C/D]
andFeMG(Ci/Di)
thenU«(F)5 5 U«(E) n F,
whereE= ( F,
AlsoU.,(E)nF=Z5.(C)nD by
lemma1.4 and theorem
4.5 (ii), [2]. Therefore, exp F mod D p°‘
and hencefor all
CID
of[AIB].
THEOREM 1.8.
Suppose A/B
is aquotient
in the p-group G and thatsG[A/B] = p°‘.
IfC/D
andE/F
are elements of~[A/B]
then~ ua(A), F, H’ ~ _ ~ ~Q(C), F, Fit)
whereH=(C11 Ct/Dte[AIB]).
PROOF. It suffices to assume that is a
projection
up.
Trivially, F, H’ ~ C T~a(C),
F,H’).
On the otherhand, U«(D), H’).
sincesc[A/B] = p°‘
and so thetheorem holds.
2. The
Projectivity Groups
of Abelian Quotients.LEMMA 2.1.
Suppose AIB
is an abelianquotient
in the p-group G and thatG = ~ A, F),
where F is some element ofMG(AIB).
LetG’ ~, G’ )
and denoteby X
thequotient X/G’
for allsubgroups
X of Gcontaining
G’. Then’
(i)
BI is a normalsubgroup
of F.(ii) tGCAI/131=tc(AIR)
iftG(A/B) = exp F/B1 .
PROOF:
(i)
holds sinceG/F
is abelian. F is an element of and isisomorphic
toF/Bl ,
henceOn the other
hand, by
definition 1.1, there exists aquotient
and such that where
Thus
D d H,
andH/(R)(1)
>is
isomorphic
toH/D.
Hence and(ii)
follows nowfrom
(1).
LEMMA 2.2. Let G denote a p-group.
Suppose A/B
is aquotient
in G and that
C/D
isprojective
toA/B.
Then for anyinteger
THEOREM 2.3.
Suppose
G is a p-group andAIB
is an abelianquotient
in G withtc(A/ B) = p(J..
ThenPROOF. We use induction on the order of G.
By
definition 1.1 there exists aquotient C/De [A/B]
and an elementFeMG(C/D),
withwhere
D )
andE=(F, C ) . By
lemma2.2 and the induction
hypothesis
we may assume thatAIB=CID
andthat G=E.
Suppose
Denoteby X
thequotient X/G’,
for allsubgroups
X of G
containing G’,
and writeG’)
andG’). By
lemma 2.2 we may assume that
AIB=AIIBI. By
lemma 2.1(ii)
Henceby
induction we haveand the theorem follows from lemma
5.10, [2]. Finally,
ifG’ =1,
thenG is an abelian p-group, say of type
(À1,
..., IfPG(A/B)= t
thenby
lemma1.2,
and the result follows from theorem5.13, [2].
COROLLARY 2.4.
Suppose
G is a p-group andA/B
is an abelianquotient
with ThenDEFINITION 2.5.
Suppose
that H is a p-group and that K is asubgroup
of H. DefineWe list without
proof
some of theproperties
of Aut(H;
a;K).
LEMMA 2.6.
Suppose H
is a p-group and K is a normalsubgroup
of H. If
H/K
is aregular
p-group then(i)
Aut(H;
~c;K)
is asubgroup
of Aut(H).
(ii)
a;K)
is a normalsubgroup
of Aut(H)
if K is acharacteristic
subgroup
of H.Theorem 2.7.
Suppose A/B
is an abelianquotient
in the p-groupG. If
tG(A/B) = pa
then(A/R;
tx;K/R),
wherePROOF. It is sufficient to
,show,
for any andxBeA/B
that where
zBeA/B
andSuppose 0
andxB are
given. By
lemma2.4, [2],
and theorem2.3, [2],
there existquotients
...,An/Bn
of[A/B], subgroups Fl ,
..., Fn of G withFI E MG(AZ/BI)
and elementszi E FZ ,
fori =1,
..., n, such that_ (xB~(zB),
where z=zi ... zn .e u«(( A; , Fi ~ ) n Fi
and henceby
theorem 1.5(ii),
n B, H’)
for all i. Also there exists an element of H’ such thatand we conclude that
DEFINITION 2.8. We say that an abelian
quotient A/B
in ap-group G has the trivial intersection
property,
orTI-property,
ifwhere
tG(A/B)=p"
andH=(E I E/Fe1[A/R]).
The next result shows that if
A/B
has theTI-property
then anyquotient projective
toA/B
also has thisproperty.
LEMMA 2.9.
Suppose A/B
is an abelianquotient
in the p-group G and thattG(AIR)=pfl..
LetC/D
be aquotient projective
toAIR
andsuppose c is a
projection
chain betweenA/B
andC/D.
Writeand
Then the
image
ofKl/B
under isK2/D.
Inparticular,
if and
only
if nPROOF. Without loss of
generality
we may assume that c=C/D)
is aprojection
up. It suffices to show that(K1 , D) =
= K2 ,
for then(Ki/B --~ K2/D)
is aprojection
up.Clearly (Ki, D ~ K2 .
On the other
hand, by
lemma1.4, C’ )
and soAs a
corollary
to theorems 2.3 and 2.7 we have:THEOREM 2.10.
Suppose A/B
is an abelianquotient
in the p-group G and thattG(A/B)=prJ..
IfA/B
has theTI-property
thenWe conclude this section with two
examples
ofquotients
whichdo not possess the
TI-property.
These show that theinequality
in theo-rems 2.3 and 2.7 are best
possible
in the sense that both bounds may be attained.I am indebted to Dr. D. W. Bames for
example
2.11.EXAMPLE 2.11. Let G be the group of order
p~,
where p isodd, generated by
elements x, y and z andsubject
to the relations:Choose A to be the
subgroup generated by
x.Clearly tdA)=p
andand hence A does not possess the
TI-property.
It is difficult toverify
that1tG(A) = Aut (A;
and that
EXAMPLE 2.12. Let G be the group of order
3 ,
withgenerators
x, y and z
subject
to the relations:Then
y3 ) .
Inparticular
G has class 2. ChooseA to be the
subgroup generated by
x. andG= E
A does not have the
77-property
since However Aut(A)
isgenerated by
the element 0 definedby (x)Ð=x2
and8=a(c),
where c is the
projection
chain:Thus
3. The
Projectivity Groups
of Non-abelian Quotients.THEOREM 3.1.
Suppose A/B
is aquotient
in the p-group G. Ifsc(A /B) = p°‘
thenThe
proof
of theorem 3.1 is similar to that of theorem 2.7.COROLLARY 3.2.
Suppose
thatA/B
is aquotient
in the p-group G. Ifor
then
4. The
DEFINITION 4.1. The number of
projections
in aprojection
chainis called the
length
of the chain.Suppose A/B
andC/D
arequotients
in the group G and that ci and c2 are
loops beginning
atA/B
andC/D respectively.
ci is said to bex-conjugate
to c2 if there exists aprojection
chain d between
A/B
andC/D
such thatIf n is any
positive integer,
definewhere c is
x-conjugate
to aloop
oflength n ~.
is
always
a normalsubgroup
of7cG(A/B).
More-over,
x01(A/B)
and1tg)(A/B)
are trivial.LEMMA 4.2.
Suppose A/B
is aquotient
in the group G. IfC/D
is any
quotient
of Gprojective
toA/B
then isisomorphic
to
PROOF. If d is a
projection
chain betweenA/B
andC/D
the map«(c)
~a(d- lcd),
for all of is anisomorphism
betweenand
~~ ~(C/D).
In the remainder of this section we shall
be mainly
concerned with whereA/B
is an abelianquotient
in the p-group G.LEMMA 4.3.
Suppose
thatA/B
is aquotient
in the group G. If ctis a
loop beginning
atA/B,
which is-conjugate
to theloop
c2 oflength four,
then either(i) a(ct)
is theidentity automorphism
or
(ii)
ci isi-homotopic
to aloop c’i
which isx-conjugate
to analternating loop c’2
of the formwhere
EIIFI)
is aprojection
up.PROOF. Since ci is
x-conjugate
to c2 , there exists aprojection
chain d such that ci
= dC2d-l.
Suppose
If c2 is not an
alternating loop
thenclearly (i)
holds. If c2 is an alternat-ing loop
and(A,IBI
-+A2/B2)
is aprojection
up then~(ii)
is satisfiedwith
c’i=ct
andc’2 = c~ . Finally
suppose is aprojec-
tion down. Let
c’2
be the sequence ofprojections 82 , 83, 84, 61
andC’1
be theprojection
chain Then ci isi-homotopic
toC’1
andC’1
isx-conjugate
toc’2,
whence(ii)
follows.THEOREM 4.4.
Suppose A/B
is an abelianquotient
in the p-group G and thattG(AIB)=p".
ThenPROOF.
(a)
We first show that(A/B)K Aut (A/B;
It is sufficient to show that all elements of
~G ~ (A/B)
of the forma(c),
where c is
~-conjugate
to aloop
ci oflength four,
are contained inAut (A/B; fia(AIB». By
theorem 2.3,t[2]
and lemma 4.3 we canchoose
for some
quotient E/F
andisomorphisms 61 and 82. By
lemma 2.4[2]
if
xDeC/D
there exist elements zi and Z2 of[C/D, Ð1]
and[E/F, Ð2]
respectively,
such that where z=ziZ2. Nowfor some w
of (E, C )’,
whenceThus and so
(CID;
Hence for cx-conjugate
to ci ,~(c)
is an element of Aut~(A/B; 9MAIB)).
(b)
It remains to show thatAut (A/B;
Since
tc(A/B)= pa,
there exists aquotient C/DE [A/B]
and an elementFeMG(C/D)
such that D is a normalsubgroup
ofF, exp F/D = p"
andE/D
is abelian whereE=(F, C).
Without loss ofgenerality
itclearly
suffices to show that
Also
by
lemma5.10, ’[2]
we haveMoreover, by
lemma 2.1ii). Thus,
to prove( 1 )
it suffices to assume that E = G and D =1.
Let A be a
subgroup
of type(~1 ,
..., in the abelian p-groupG,
where G hastype (À1,
...,Xk).
IfPG(A)=t
thenby
lemma1.2, tG(A)=pÀt = p°‘.
The theorem will beproved provided
that we can showSuppose
8 is an element ofAut (A;
If xeA then there existsz of A such that where
I z Using arguments
similar to those ofJacobson (~[ 1 ] ,
pp.18-21),
it is easy to show tat every ele- ment ofAut (A;
is theproduct
ofelementary automorphism
of the
following
two types:Here ...,
ar }
is a basis for A and theautomorphisms
are definedby taking
elements from one basis to thecorresponding
elements in the other.To
complete
theproof
of the theorem we show thatautomorphisms
of types
( I )
and(II)
areprojectivities
in G oflength
four.By corollary 5.6, [2]
we may assume the existence of acyclic subgroup
C of Gof order
pÀt
which has trivial intersection with A.Suppose
0 is anautomorphism
of type(I).
Choose an element z of C such that
I z _
.Then
and
is a
projection
chain withSuppose finally
that 8 is aprojectivity
of type(II).
Choose an element z of C whose order is
equal
to the order ofai . Put
and
Then
and
is a
projection
chain withSince 0 may be any
automorphism
of type(I)
or(II)
we conclude that(2)
holds and hence that the theorem isproved.
As a consequence of theorem 4.4 and theorem 2.10 we have COROLLARY 4.5.
Suppose
thatA/B
is an abelianquotient
in thep-group G. If
A/B
has the trivial intersection property thenCOROLLARY 4.6.
Suppose
thatA/B
is an abelianquotient
in thep-group G. Then is a normal
subgroup
ofAut (A/B).
REFERENCES
[1] JACOBSON, N.: Lectures in Abstract Algebra, vol. 2, Van Nostrand, 1953.
[2] WEHRHAHN, K. H.: Projectivities in Finite p-groups I, Math. Zeitschr. (to appear).
Manoscritto pervenuto in redazione il 18 gennaio 1972.