• Aucun résultat trouvé

Research Method Track

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Research Method Track"

Copied!
1
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Research Method Track

Barbara Paech1, Roel Wieringa2

1Heidelberg University, Germany, [email protected]

2University of Twente, Netherlands, [email protected]

In 2015 REFSQ hosted for the first time a research method track. The track was organized by the authors. It extended the empirical track from previous REFSQ conferences to provide a forum for the exchange about research methods and their application. While commonly accepted guidelines for experiments exist, there is much more debate on how to conduct other forms of research studies: how to design, plan and justify research, and how to ensure relevance, generalizability and applicability to industry? Specific questions are for example: how to assess state-of- art, how to generalize from empirical studies, and how to set up longitudinal studies?

In response to the Call for Papers, four submissions were received All proposals were independently reviewed by 3-4 members of the Program Committee, who provided recommendation for acceptance or rejection. As a result of this process, two submissions were accepted for presentation: one live-study and one mini-tutorial.

The live-study Collecting Natural Language Trace Queries by Sugandha Lohar, Jane Cleland-Huang, Alexander Rasin and Patrick Maeder aims at studying what kind of information developers want to gain from traces between their software artefacts.

The mini-tutorial Focus Groups: Cost-effective and Methodologically Sound Ways to Get Practitioners Involved in Your Empirical RE Research by Maya Daneva provides an introduction to this very important requirements engineering technique which is only rarely taught to students.

In addition, the Research Method Track contains a session in which young researchers can ask experiences experts in research methodology questions about the structure and design of their own research. It is expected that this will be part of a process of knowledge-sharing in which we continuously raise the standards of our own research.

We would like to thank the members of the REFSQ Program Committee and the experts of the Panel for their volunteer work. Last, but not least, we gratefully acknowledge the support from the local organizers.

206

Copyright © 2015 by the authors. Copying permitted for private and academic purposes.

This volume is published and copyrighted by its editors.

Références

Documents relatifs

 Columbia  University

–  research discussions –  paper presentations –  practice talks. – 

At the end of each class, one (or more) homework is assigned The deadline depends on the topic (between 1 and 4 weeks). The deadline is

Very dense agenda (in the past, we used to have 7 weeks) Lots of exercices in class, homework, and one final

Class  by  David  Jensen  at  University  of  Massachusetts,  Amherst    .!. DOING RESEARCH

The project’s focus on innovative research practices ranged from data collection to analysis and covered disciplines such as (social) psychology, sociology, social work,

Kurose, “10 pieces of advice I wish my PhD advisor had given

Very dense agenda (in the past, we used to have 7 weeks) Lots of exercices in class, homework, and one final