HAL Id: hal-02993308
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02993308
Submitted on 23 Nov 2020
HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.
L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.
The use of lithogeochemistry in delineating
hydrothermal fluid pathways and vectoring towards gold mineralization in the Malartic district, Québec
Nicolas Gaillard, E. Williams-Jones Anthony, James Clark, Stefano Salvi, Stéphane Perrouty, Robert L. Linnen, Gema Olivo
To cite this version:
Nicolas Gaillard, E. Williams-Jones Anthony, James Clark, Stefano Salvi, Stéphane Perrouty, et al.. The use of lithogeochemistry in delineating hydrothermal fluid pathways and vectoring towards gold mineralization in the Malartic district, Québec. Ore Geology Reviews, Elsevier, 2020, 120,
�10.1016/j.oregeorev.2020.103351�. �hal-02993308�
The use of lithogeochemistry in delineating hydrothermal fluid pathways and vectoring gold mineralization in the Malartic district, Québec”
Authors
Nicolas Gaillard
1, Anthony E. Williams-Jones
1, James R. Clark
1, Stefano Salvi
2, Stéphane Perrouty
3,4, Robert L. Linnen
4, Gema R. Olivo
5Affiliations
1
McGill University, Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 3450 University Street, Montréal, QC, H3A 0E8, Canada
2
Géosciences Environnement Toulouse (GET), Université Paul Sabatier, CNRS, Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, 14 avenue Edouard Belin, F-31400 Toulouse, France
3
Laurentian University, Mineral Exploration Research Centre, Harquail School of Earth Sciences, Goodman School of Mines, 935 Ramsey Lake Road, Sudbury, ON, P3E 2C6, Canada
4
Western University, Department of Earth Sciences, 1151 Richmond Street, London, ON, N6A 6B7, Canada
5
Queen’s University, Department of Geological Sciences and Geological Engineering, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada
Corresponding author
Nicolas Gaillard
McGill University, Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences
3450 University Street, Montréal, QC, H3A 0E8, Canada
nicolas.gaillard@mail.mcgill.ca
2 Abstract
1
The Canadian Malartic world-class low grade, large tonnage gold deposit is located in the southeastern 2
Superior Province of Canada. With reserves estimated at 6.38 Moz Au grading 1.10 g/t Au, it is currently 3
the largest open pit mine in the Abitibi gold camp. The deposit is hosted predominantly by Pontiac Group 4
metasedimentary rocks, Piché Group metavolcanic rocks, and quartz monzodiorite porphyritic intrusions.
5
Stockwork-disseminated gold mineralization generally consists of a low-grade envelope of disseminated 6
pyritic ore (0.35 to 1 g/t Au) grading inwards into higher grade (>1 g/t Au) stockwork and breccia zones.
7
Hydrothermal alteration in the metasedimentary rocks displays a consistent zonation with distance from the 8
main fluid pathways. Proximal alteration is characterized by a microcline±albite-quartz replacement-type 9
assemblage, with lesser phlogopite, calcite±Fe-dolomite, pyrite and rutile. The distal alteration assemblage 10
is dominated by biotite, microcline±albite, phengite, quartz, calcite, pyrite and rutile.
11
In this study, a lithogeochemical approach is used to assess the magnitude and distribution of fluid-rock 12
interaction in the metasedimentary rocks of the Malartic district. The metaturbidites are separated into four 13
sub-lithologies according to grain size characteristics to reduce the effects of primary depositional processes 14
on mass change calculations. Despite the variability in protolith compositions, the metasedimentary rocks 15
define a geochemically consistent, cogenetic sequence. The results of the mass transfer calculations indicate 16
progressive gains in C-S-K
2O and LOI, as well as Au-Te-W-Ag±(As-Be-Sb-Bi-Mo-Pb) from background, 17
through distal to proximal alteration zones (relative to least altered samples). Molar element ratio analysis 18
(alkali/aluminium) indicates an increase in alkali metasomatism (K and Na) adjacent to the fluid pathways, 19
which is manifested by the progressive stabilization of microcline and albite (at the expense of biotite and 20
white mica).
21
Ore-associated pathfinder elements delineate broad enrichment patterns around the deposit, and can be 22
used to outline hydrothermal fluid circulations in the Malartic district. A statistical approach based on the 23
comparison of the mass balance results with the background composition provides robust constraints on the 24
magnitude and extent of the lithogeochemical haloes. Most alteration envelopes extend along the S
2fabric, 25
and the largest lithogeochemical anomalies (e.g., Au, W, Te and Ag) reach up to 10 kilometers in length, 26
and 2 kilometers in width. These observations demonstrate that whole-rock lithogeochemistry provides a 27
valuable vectoring tool toward gold mineralization in a regional exploration context.
28
3 1. Introduction
29
Major gold deposits in metamorphic terranes are typically surrounded by extensive wall-rock alteration 30
haloes manifested by systematic changes in mineralogy away from the hydrothermal fluid pathways 31
(Clark et al., 1989; Eilu and Mikucki, 1998; Bierlein et al., 1998; Eilu et al., 1999; Bierlein et al., 2000;
32
Knight et al., 2000; Eilu and Groves, 2001; Goldfarb et al., 2005). The lateral zonation of alteration reflects 33
the progressive decrease in fluid-rock interaction with increasing distance (i.e., rock-buffering) from the 34
hydrothermal centers (Khorzinskii, 1968; McCuaig et al., 1993; Ridley et al., 1996). Because the variations 35
in alteration mineralogy are generally commensurate with mass transfer processes, lithogeochemical data 36
can be used to assess the magnitude and spatial distribution of fluid-rock interaction (Bierlein et al., 1998;
37
Eilu et al., 2001; Warren et al., 2007; Whitbread and Moore, 2004; Prendergast, 2007). In particular, 38
methods involving mass balance calculations constitute a quantitative approach to evaluate the effects of 39
metasomatic processes (Gresens, 1967; Grant, 1986; MacLean and Barrett, 1993; Mathieu, 2018).
40
Likewise, molar element ratio analysis can be used to investigate mass transfer processes, and also offers a 41
direct means to interpret alteration-related mineralogical reactions (Madeisky and Stanley, 1993; Warren 42
et al., 2007; Stanley, 2017). The results of mass transfer calculations and molar element ratio analysis 43
therefore provide key parameters for mapping the spatial distribution of alteration that defines the footprint 44
of major gold deposits (Eilu and Mikucki, 1998; Eilu et al., 1999; Whitbread and Moore, 2004; Warren et 45
al., 2007; Stock, 2012). Most notably, ore-related ‘pathfinder’ elements (e.g., W, Te, Sb, Bi or As) can 46
delineate lithogeochemical anomalies that extend far beyond the limits of the macroscopic hydrothermal 47
alteration (Eilu and Groves, 2001; Whitbread and Moore, 2004; Perrouty et al., 2018).
48
In this study, we characterize the lithogeochemical signature of hydrothermal alteration at the Canadian 49
Malartic stockwork-disseminated gold deposit (Québec), and extract parameters to map the intensity and 50
distribution of fluid-rock interaction. This approach should prove especially useful in a mineral exploration 51
context by providing potential lithogeochemical vectors toward gold mineralization (Warren et al., 2007;
52
Stock, 2012; Halley et al., 2015). For this purpose, mass transfer calculations are conducted to evaluate 53
the magnitude of the metasomatic processes and their spatial distribution across the Malartic district.
54
In addition, molar element ratios are used to assess the mineralogical controls on alkali mobility.
55
4 2. Regional Geology
56
The Abitibi greenstone belt of Québec, in the southeast Superior Province, comprises world-renowned 57
mining localities such as the Val d’Or, Malartic and Rouyn-Noranda gold districts (Fig. 1). Major gold 58
deposits occur principally along a crustal-scale structure, the Cadillac-Larder Lake Fault Zone, which 59
separates the Abitibi greenstone belt to the north from the Pontiac metasedimentary belt to the south.
60
The former consists of a succession of mafic-ultramafic to felsic volcanic rocks of tholeiitic to calc-alkaline 61
affinity (emplaced from 2750 to 2696 Ma; Ayer et al., 2002; Thurston et al., 2008), which was succeeded by 62
greywacke-mudstone sedimentation between 2690 and 2685 Ma (Ayer et al., 2005; Frieman et al., 2017).
63
South of the Cadillac-Larder Lake Fault Zone, the Pontiac Group consists of a turbidite sequence dominated 64
by greywacke-mudstone that were deposited from 2685 to 2682 Ma (Davis, 2002). The Timiskaming Group 65
metasedimentary rocks (alluvial-fluvial facies) were unconformably deposited on older units from 2677 to 66
2670 Ma (Ayer et al., 2005; Thurston et al., 2008). Several episodes of intrusive magmatism, the onset of 67
which was contemporaneous with early volcanism, continued during to shortly after major tectonic activity 68
(Sutcliffe et al., 1993; Davis et al., 2000; Chown et al., 2002). These intrusions range in composition from 69
sodic tonalite-granodiorite (syn-volcanic), through calc-alkaline tonalite and alkaline syenite (syn-tectonic), 70
to S-type two-mica granite and pegmatite (post-tectonic) (see Gaillard et al. 2018 for further details).
71
Regional deformation was polyphase, and comprised three main contractional events (Ayer et al., 2002;
72
Robert et al., 2005; Perrouty et al., 2017). The first shortening episode (D
1) initiated immediately after the 73
deposition of the turbidite-dominated basins, and was dominated by a fold-and-thrust style of deformation 74
(Wilkinson et al., 1999; Bleeker, 2015). The second episode of deformation (D
2) followed deposition of the 75
Timiskaming-type sedimentary rocks, and was manifested by north-south compression and local strike-slip 76
transpression (Daigneault et al., 2002; Robert et al., 2005). This event was broadly contemporaneous with 77
regional metamorphism (M
2), which ranged in grade from prehnite-pumpellyite to mid-amphibolite facies 78
(Powell et al., 1995). Peak metamorphism was likely reached between 2665 and 2655 Ma, and postdated 79
most D
2deformation (Wilkinson et al., 1999; Ayer et al., 2005; Piette-Lauzière et al., 2018). The third 80
episode of deformation (D
3) was characterized by dextral transcurrent motion along major fault zones 81
(Daigneault et al., 2002; Ayer et al., 2005).
82
5 3. Local Geology
83
Host lithologies 84
The Canadian Malartic deposit is hosted by three lithotypes, namely the Pontiac Group metasedimentary 85
rocks, the Piché Group metavolcanic rocks, and porphyritic quartz monzodiorite to granodiorite that intrude 86
these units (Trudel and Sauvé, 1992). The Pontiac Group metasedimentary belt, at the northern margin 87
of the Pontiac subprovince, forms a laterally extensive unit that stretches along the Cadillac-Larder Lake 88
Fault Zone (Camiré et al., 1993; Mortensen and Card, 1993). It is composed of greywacke-mudstone 89
successions, the petrographic and lithogeochemical characteristics of which will be described in detail later 90
in this paper (see sections 6.1 and 6.2). The Piché Group (>2709 Ma; Pilote et al., 2015) forms a thin unit 91
(<2 km) restricted to the Cadillac-Larder Lake Fault Zone, and consists dominantly of mafic-intermediate 92
to ultramafic metavolcanic rocks, as well as minor mafic to felsic intrusions and metasedimentary rocks 93
(Simard et al., 2013; Bedeaux et al., 2018). In the Malartic district, these units are intruded by a series of 94
quartz monzodiorite to granodiorite porphyritic intrusions that were emplaced at 2677-2679 Ma (Helt et al., 95
2014; De Souza et al., 2015, 2016).
96
Deformation and metamorphism 97
The Malartic district was affected by a complex sequence of deformation and metamorphic events 98
(Camiré and Burg, 1993; Benn et al., 1994; Ghassemi, 1996; Perrouty et al., 2017; Gaillard et al., 2018;
99
Piette-Lauzière et al., 2018). The first episode of compressional deformation (D
1) was manifested by 100
isoclinal folding of the Pontiac Group metaturbidites (F
1), and is generally recognized from inversions in 101
the polarity of the sedimentary bedding (Perrouty et al., 2017; Gaillard et al., 2018). The second episode of 102
deformation (D
2) produced moderately tight, upright folds (F
2) associated with a penetrative axial-planar 103
cleavage (S
2) (Trudel and Sauvé, 1992). The S
2foliation represents the dominant tectono-metamorphic 104
fabric in the Malartic district (associated with M
2metamorphism), and is defined by biotite±white mica and 105
subordinate chlorite, as well as aligned aggregates of pyrite±pyrrhotite-chalcopyrite (Gaillard et al., 2018).
106
A third episode of deformation (D
3) is represented by rare chevron folds (F
3) and small-scale kink bands, 107
and is locally associated with late chlorite-calcite stringers (Desrochers, 1996; Perrouty et al., 2017).
108
The M
2metamorphic event is reflected in the Malartic district by a gradual increase in grade from upper 109
greenschist facies (biotite zone) adjacent to the Cadillac-Larder Lake Fault Zone to mid-amphibolite facies
110
6
(staurolite zone) a few kilometers (generally 1.5 to 2.5 kilometers) to the south (Fig.2). The axial-planar 111
setting of the metamorphic foliation (S
2) relative to the F
2folds suggests that prograde metamorphism (M
2) 112
was broadly coeval with D
2deformation (Gaillard et al., 2018). In addition, linear inclusion trails oriented 113
parallel to the S
2foliation in garnet and staurolite are interpreted to reflect a late-kinematic timing for peak 114
metamorphism (M
2) relative to D
2deformation (Piette-Lauzière, 2017; Gaillard et al., 2018). These textural 115
interpretations are consistent with geochronological evidence from Lu-Hf dating on garnet, which indicate 116
that peak metamorphism occurred at 2657.5±4.4 Ma (Piette-Lauzière et al., 2018).
117
4. Canadian Malartic Gold Deposit 118
The Canadian Malartic deposit is a world-class low grade, large tonnage gold deposit that contains 119
reserves estimated at 6.38 Moz Au at a grade of 1.10 g/t Au. The deposit overall gold endowment, calculated 120
from the present and past production, plus mineral reserves and resources (excluding inferred) is estimated 121
at 16.3 Moz Au (see Gaillard et al., 2018 and references therein). With an annual gold production of 0.63 122
Moz Au in 2017, the Canadian Malartic open-pit mine is currently the largest gold-producing operation in 123
Canada.
124
Nature and distribution of mineralized zones 125
The Canadian Malartic stockwork-disseminated gold deposit consists of a low-grade (0.35 to 1 g/t Au) 126
semi-continuous halo of pyritic alteration, which generally transitions inwards to higher grade (>1 g/t Au) 127
stockwork and breccia zones (Fig. 3; Robert and Poulsen, 1997). The distribution of the mineralized zones 128
is controlled by three main structures, which are interpreted to have acted as preferential pathways for 129
hydrothermal fluids (Fig. 3). First, the Sladen Fault is a 3 km-long, E-W -t rending, S-dipping ductile-brittle 130
shear zone, and represents a first-order splay off the Cadillac-Larder Lake Fault Zone (Fig. 3; Trudel and 131
Sauvé, 1992; De Souza et al., 2016). Second, the NW-SE deformation zones represent a series of parallel, 132
high-strain bands axial-planar to F
2folds (Fig. 3; Sansfaçon and Hubert, 1990; De Souza et al., 2016).
133
Third, the Barnat Fault forms of a corridor of anastomosing shears that extend along the southern margin 134
of the Cadillac-Larder Lake Fault Zone, parallel to the NW-SE deformation zones (Fig. 3; Trudel and 135
Sauvé, 1992). Gold mineralization also displays a close spatial association with quartz monzodiorite to 136
granodiorite porphyritic intrusions, most notably along faulted contacts with the metasedimentary and 137
metavolcanic host rocks (Fig. 3; Helt et al., 2014; Perrouty et al., 2017).
138
7 Hydrothermal alteration
139
The Canadian Malartic deposit is typified by stockworks of quartz-biotite-carbonate-microcline±pyrite 140
veinlets (v2) associated with a pervasive microcline-albite-biotite±(white mica)-carbonate-pyrite alteration 141
(Robert, 2001; de Souza et al., 2015, 2016; Gaillard et al., 2018). Systematic variations in alteration reflect 142
a lateral zonation of hydrothermal features away from the fluid corridors (de Souza et al., 2016; Gaillard et 143
al., 2018). The proximal alteration is typified by a beige-brown replacement-type assemblage dominated 144
by microcline±albite-quartz, with variable proportions of phlogopite, calcite, Fe-dolomite, pyrite and rutile 145
(Fig. 5A-B). This alteration displays a strong genetic association with ore-stage (v2) veinlets, and coincides 146
spatially with dense veining in stockwork and breccia zones (Fig. 5A-B).
147
In the metasedimentary rocks, the proximal alteration transitions outwards to a blue-grey distal alteration 148
assemblage consisting of biotite, microcline±albite, phengite, quartz, calcite, pyrite and rutile (Fig. 5C-D).
149
The strength of the distal alteration is controlled mainly by ore-stage (v2) veinlets, as manifested by a broad 150
correlation of pyrite and calcite alterations with veining (v2) intensity (Fig. 5C-D). The transition from 151
proximal to distal alteration is accompanied by a gradual increase in the proportions of biotite (Mg-rich) 152
and white mica (phengite) at the expense of microcline±albite (Fig. 5C-D). The mineralogy of the distal 153
assemblage is affected by the composition of the metasedimentary rocks, as indicated by increased phengite 154
alteration in fine-grained mudstone beds (de Souza et al., 2016; Gaillard et al., 2018; Lypaczewski et al., in 155
review) (Fig. 5C).
156
In addition, hydrothermal alteration is also manifested by a broad sulfidation-oxidation halo surrounding 157
the main fluid pathways (Gaillard et al., 2018). This halo is delineated by systematic outward transitions in 158
Fe-sulfide (from pyrite to pyrite±pyrrhotite) and Fe-Ti oxide (from rutile to ilmenite) minerals, and typically 159
extends a few meters beyond the limit of the ore-shell (>0.35 g/t Au). These transitions are interpreted to 160
reflect decreases in sulfidation (∑aS) and oxidation (fO
2) parameters away from the hydrothermal corridors 161
(Nesbitt, 1986a,b; Gaillard et al., 2018).
162
Ore mineralogy 163
Gold mineralization at Canadian Malartic consists of native gold and Au-(Ag)-bearing telluride minerals 164
in quartz-biotite-carbonate-microcline±pyrite (v2) veinlets and associated alteration envelopes (Helt et al., 165
2014; De Souza et al., 2016; Gaillard et al., 2018). The ore assemblage is typified by native gold, petzite 166
(Ag
3AuTe
2) and calaverite (AuTe
2), along with hessite (Ag
2Te), altaite (PbTe) and minor Bi-bearing
167
8
tellurides (Helt et al., 2014). These minerals are generally accompanied by minor chalcopyrite and galena, 168
as well as rare sphalerite and molybdenite. Mineralogical and textural observations indicate a consistent 169
association of native gold and telluride minerals with disseminated pyrite (Helt et al., 2014; Gaillard et al., 170
in review). This association is generally manifested by the precipitation of gold-bearing minerals in the 171
vicinity, or in direct contact with pyrite grains. Hydrothermal pyrite typically displays composite textures 172
manifested by three main paragenetic stages (Type 1 to 3), the first and second of which are interpreted to 173
have precipitated from ore-forming fluids (Gaillard et al., in review). Native gold and Au-(Ag)-telluride 174
minerals also occur as small (sub-micron) inclusions and nano-particles in Type 1 and 2 pyrite, as indicated 175
by elevated Au and ore-related element (Ag, Te, Pb and Bi) concentrations (Gao et al., 2015; Gaillard et 176
al., in review).
177
5. Methods 178
Sampling strategy 179
A total of 596 metasedimentary rock samples were collected and analyzed for whole-rock major and 180
trace element compositions (see Piercey et al. (2014) for details on the sampling protocol). The drill core 181
and surface samples were taken from homogeneous intervals representative of the lithology and alteration 182
at each site. Sampling was distributed across the Malartic district over an area of approximately 15×7.5 183
kilometers, thus providing a regional framework with which to assess the metasomatic effects associated 184
with hydrothermal fluid-rock interaction (Fig. 2). Sampling density was increased near the deposit to assess 185
the lithogeochemical signatures of the proximal and distal alteration facies. The regional distribution of 186
samples was designed to characterize the background geochemical variations of the Pontiac Group 187
metasedimentary rocks. With respect to the latter, samples were divided into three groups according to their 188
alteration characteristics, from background samples (n=443) with no visible evidence of hydrothermal 189
alteration, to distal (n=123) and proximal (n=30) alteration types.
190
Whole-rock lithogeochemical analyses 191
The samples were crushed, split and pulverized with mild steel to <75 µm (package Prep-31) by ALS 192
Canada (Vancouver, BC). The major and minor element compositions were determined after lithium fusion 193
using wavelength dispersive X-ray fluorescence analysis (package 4C-XRF Fusion) by Activation 194
Laboratories (Ancaster, ON). The minor and trace element compositions, including those of rare earth
195
9
elements (REE), were analyzed using a combination of ICP-AES and -MS after sodium peroxide fusion 196
(package GE ICM90A) by SGS Canada (Burnaby, BC). Whole-rock major, minor and trace element 197
compositions, including gold concentrations, were also determined using ICP-AES and ICP-MS analysis 198
following partial digestion using aqua regia (package ME-MS41L) by ALS Canada. Whole-rock sulfur 199
and carbon analyses were carried out using a LECO analyzer (infrared absorption spectroscopy after 200
combustion) by SGS Canada (package GE CSA06V). The accuracy and precision of the whole-rock 201
lithogeochemical analyses were monitored through systematic incorporation of standard, blank and 202
duplicate samples. Details of the quality control and assurance protocols (QA/QC), and cross-validation 203
results are provided in Perrouty et al. (2018).
204
Evaluation and preparation of the lithogeochemical dataset 205
A systematic approach was implemented to evaluate the lithogeochemical dataset as a prerequisite for 206
further investigation and statistical analysis. Elements with more than 5% of values below the lower 207
detection limit (non-detect values) were discarded (left-censored datasets). In addition, elements with a 208
large number of values close to detection limit (i.e., more than 50% of analyses below 3×LOD value) were 209
also removed. The presence of non-detect values is typically a source of complication for subsequent data 210
analysis and calculation of summary statistics (Helsel, 2005; Huston and Juarez-Colunga, 2009). Simple 211
methods for handling censored values (deletion or arbitrary replacement) typically disregard the effects of 212
closure that characterize compositional data (Aitchison, 1986) and have been shown to generate biased 213
estimates of the mean and variance (Helsel and Gilliom, 1986; Makvandi et al., 2016). In this study, a 214
multivariate imputation method was implemented to replace the censored values using the 215
zCompositions package in the R software environment (Hron et al., 2010; Palarea-Albaladejo and 216
Martin-Fernández, 2013, 2015). The imputation method relied on the robust isometric log-ratio expectation- 217
maximisation algorithm, an iterative compositional procedure that estimates the non-detect values through 218
the preservation of the multivariate relative covariation structure of the dataset (Palarea-Albaladejo et al., 219
2014).
220
Mass balance calculations 221
Mass transfer associated with hydrothermal alteration was calculated following the principles of Gresens 222
(1967), wherein the evaluation of mass changes is based on the comparison of altered rock compositions 223
with those of their least altered rock equivalents (precursors). In the absence of density measurements, the
224
10
overall mass/volume change caused by hydrothermal alteration was estimated using immobile element 225
ratios (MacLean, 1990). Elements such as Al, Ti and Zr are generally considered to be immobile 226
in hydrothermal systems under a wide range of physico-chemical conditions (Finlow-Bates and Stumpfl, 227
1981; MacLean and Barrett, 1993). Because immobile element pairs retain constant ratios during alteration, 228
the selection of immobile elements for mass change calculations can be assessed graphically from their 229
linear relationships in bi-variate plots (MacLean and Kranidiotis, 1987). As shown by Warren et al. (2007), 230
the use of immobile element ratios in place of density and volume factor terms yields a simplified 231
expression of Gresens’ mass change equation, which is equivalent to that of MacLean and Barrett (1993).
232
This approach involves the calculation of the reconstructed composition of a component X, corrected for 233
the overall mass/volume change produced by hydrothermal alteration:
234
RC
XA= C
XA× (C
imm.P/ C
imm.A) (1) where:
235
o RC
XAis the reconstructed composition of a component X in sample A (altered rock) 236
o C
XAis the concentration of a component X in A (altered rock) 237
o C
imm.P/ C
imm.Ais the concentration ratio of an immobile component in P (precursor) to A (altered rock) 238
In this study, the mass changes are expressed relative to the composition of the precursor rock, and 239
correspond to the ratio of the reconstructed composition of component X in the sample of interest to the 240
concentration of the same component in the precursor rock:
241
∆
X= RC
XA/ C
XP(2)
where:
242
o ∆
Xis the mass change of a component X, relative to the precursor composition 243
o C
XPis the concentration of a component X in P (precursor) 244
The expression of the mass transfer as a ratio relative to the precursor composition yields results that are 245
restricted to the positive number space, which facilitates data manipulation (e.g., log-transformation) for 246
subsequent statistical calculations and map representation (cf. Perrouty et al., 2018). In this context, the 247
values below unity correspond to depletions, whereas values above unity represent enrichments relative 248
to the least altered samples (e.g., concentration factor).
249
11 Lithogeochemical mapping and spatial data analysis 250
The results of the mass change calculations are presented as a series of maps that illustrate the 251
distribution of fluid-rock metasomatic interactions in the metasedimentary rocks of the Malartic district.
252
Spatial interpolation between the discrete data points was conducted using a minimum curvature gridding 253
algorithm in the Geosoft Oasis Montaj® software. The complete dataset used to produce the 254
lithogeochemical maps is reported separately in the supplementary material attached to this study.
255
Because the selected criteria for the spatial representation of the mass changes remain partly arbitrary 256
(e.g., the color scale), a statistical approach was implemented to investigate the magnitude and distribution 257
of the metasomatic haloes. The aim of this method is to establish a statistical framework in order to compare 258
the spatial extent of the different lithogeochemical anomalies, and thus to provide robust constraints on the 259
mobility of the pathfinder elements. Our approach therefore consists in formulating the mass balance results 260
in terms of standard deviation distance relative to the background population mean (standard score). This 261
method is generally referred to as standardization and is most commonly applied to normally-distributed 262
datasets. For most elements, however, the distribution of the mass change data in the background 263
metasedimentary rock population (n=443) is best approximated by a log-normal distribution. For this 264
reason, the geometric mean (x "
*) and multiplicative standard deviation (s
*) were used to characterize 265
the central tendency and dispersion of the data, respectively (Limpert et al., 2001). Given a component X, 266
these parameters are expressed as:
267
x "
*= exp $ 1
n · % ln(x
i)
n
i=1
& (3)
s
*= exp () 1
n - 1 · % * ln + x
ix "
*,-
2n
i=1