• Aucun résultat trouvé

Economic assessment of greenhouse gas mitigation on livestock farms

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Economic assessment of greenhouse gas mitigation on livestock farms"

Copied!
2
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HAL Id: hal-01210928

https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01210928

Submitted on 2 Jun 2020

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

Economic assessment of greenhouse gas mitigation on livestock farms

Vera Eory, Philippe Faverdin, Donal O’Brien

To cite this version:

Vera Eory, Philippe Faverdin, Donal O’Brien. Economic assessment of greenhouse gas mitigation on livestock farms. 3. Climate Smart Agriculture, Mar 2015, Montpellier, France. 2015, Abstracts of the climate smart agriculture 2015. �hal-01210928�

(2)

Oral Presentations L1.4 Europe

65 16:45 Economic assessment of greenhouse gas mitigation on livestock farms

Eory Vera1, Faverdin Philippe2, O'Brien Donal3

1Scotland’s Rural College (SRUC), Land Economy, Environment & Society, EH9 3JG, Edinburgh, United Kingdom

2INRA, UMR Physiologie, Environnement et Génétique pour l’Animal et les Systèmes d’Élevage, F-35000 Rennes, France

3Teagasc, Animal & Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Moorepark, Fermoy, Co Cork, Ireland

One of the main challenges of livestock production is to reduce its environmental burden while meeting the increased demand for animal products in a changing climate. A wide range of management practices and technologies are available to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from European livestock farms. The variability in environmental, financial and management conditions of the farms inevitably leads to differences in the applicability, mitigation potential and costs of these options. Economic assessments of GHG mitigation usually consider an ‘average’ farm in a region or country, without the detailed implementation of the options on individual farms. This paper is presenting an economic assessment of mitigation options as implemented on two modelled livestock farms: a continental dairy mixed farm (France) and a maritime grassland based dairy farm (Ireland). The mitigation options include cover crops, legumes, nitrification inhibitors, fat and nitrate feeding, and genetic improvement of livestock. The biophysical aspects of the farms were modelled in FarmAC, a deterministic farm model, in a related work. This provided data on production, GHG and ammonia emissions and nitrogen leaching for the baseline and the mitigation scenarios. The corresponding net technical costs were calculated to reflect the management changes required for implementing the mitigation options, and included changes in resource costs, labour and income. The net technical costs of the options were compared to the greenhouse gas emission changes to calculate the cost-effectiveness of the mitigation options. Results rank the mitigation options in terms of their cost-effectiveness and highlight the differences between the two farms. The divergent practical implementation of the mitigation options is discussed, focusing on the variability in cost elements and abatement potential, and emphasising the need for individually tailored mitigation advice for farmers.

Références

Documents relatifs

(3) - Art 324-1 « Le blanchissement est le fait de faciliter, partout moyen la justification mensongère de l’origine des biens ou des revenus de l’autre d’un

Across all study areas, more than 80% of the farmers believe in CC and more than 60% observe a CC-effect on their on-farm yields (especially in Africa). However, less than 50% of

Livestock farming contributes to climate change but in turns it is also affected by a changing climate directly on animal performances or indirectly via feed resources availability

Pour valider l’accord, on peut remplacer le participe par un adjectif dont l’accord est simple, comme vert.. La montagne

- CA system with Cajanus as cover plant is the best suitable option for all simulated farm types. - The subsistence-oriented farms registered the highest but also the most

Waste managtt FARM SYSTEM FARM SYSTEM CERES - EGC FARMSIM Imports / PASIM (Riedoet al., 1998) IPCC Exports Module 7: Feedingsystems Module 7: Feedingsystems Module 1:

From the study of the multiple interrelations between gases and between farm compartments, the following mitigation options are advised for organic mixed crop-dairy systems: (1)

Evaluating innovative scenarios to enhance mixed crop-livestock farms sustainability: A partnership methodology based on long-term farmers’