• Aucun résultat trouvé

193. Barriers to adaptation and mitigation to climate change in livestock farms of Africa, South America and Europe

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "193. Barriers to adaptation and mitigation to climate change in livestock farms of Africa, South America and Europe"

Copied!
1
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Poster Session 2 L2.5 Overcoming barriers: policies and institutional arrangements to support CSA

297

193.

Barriers to adaptation and mitigation to climate change in livestock farms of

Africa, South America and Europe

Frey Hélène1, Vayssières Jonathan1, Messad Samir1, Koslowski Franck2, Stienezen Marcia3, Cardoso Viera Paulo4, Poccard René1, Blanchard Mélanie1, Silvestri Silvia5, García de Jalón Silvestre6, Lecomte Philippe1

1CIRAD, French Agricultural Research Centre for International Development, Umr SELMET Tropical and Mediterranean Livestock Production Systems, 34398, Montpellier, France

2SRUC, Scotland’s Rural College, Department of Land Economy, Environment & Society Research Group, EH93JG, Edinburgh, Scotland

3WUR, Wageningen University, Livestock Research, 6708 WD, Wageningen, The Netherlands

4UFRGS, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Faculdade de Agronomia, Grazing Ecology Research Group, 91540, Porto Alegre, Brazil

5ILRI, International Livestock Research Institute, 00100, Nairobi, Kenya

6UPM, Technical University of Madrid, Department of Agricultural Economics and Social Sciences, 28040, Madrid, Spain

Livestock farming contributes to climate change but in turns it is also affected by a changing climate directly on animal performances or indirectly via feed resources availability in terms of quantity and quality. Numerous studies have analysed the diversity of barriers for farmers to adopt new technologies for climate change adaptation and mitigation. But these studies were generally conducted for specific contexts. As part of the AnimalChange European research project, this work focuses on assessing farm-scale barriers across 10 countries: Senegal, Burkina-Faso, Kenya, South Africa, Madagascar, Brazil, France, Scotland, Netherlands, and Ireland, encompassing for both low and high-input systems.

A generic questionnaire was designed and applied to 175 farms addressing three themes i) general data on the farmer, his farm and its environment, ii) farmer’s perception on climate change, iii) likeliness for introducing management options and barriers assessment if the option is not likely to be adopted. Based on a multiple factorial analysis, we characterised the links between barriers and farm activities, pedo-climatic conditions, market access, information access, funding, and farmer’s education.

This broad analysis provides an overview of technical, social and economic barriers across different regions and systems. The main barriers to adoption in the South countries are mainly represented by lack of information, funding, and education, whilst in the North, the most important barriers are access to land and labour. The results of this research could be used by policy makers to understand what poses barriers to adoption across different sites.

Références

Documents relatifs

Raimy suggests that before psychotherapy can succeed, the therapist must help the client detect and modify those misconceptions, or faulty be- liefs, that are central to

The Green Climate Fund could test innovative approaches to the integration of adaptation and mitigation and stimulate changes at the national level in recipient countries and at

Across all study areas, more than 80% of the farmers believe in CC and more than 60% observe a CC-effect on their on-farm yields (especially in Africa). However, less than 50% of

(Pramova E., Locatelli B., Djoudi H., Somorin O., forthcoming. Forests and trees for social adaptation to climate variability and change. WIREs Climate Change, online first.

Consequently, just as there are synergies and trade-offs between global and local ecosystem services, there are synergies and trade-offs between mitigation and

REDD+ projects can increase forest resilience No explicit reference Forest A => M Adaptation measures can increase the permanence of carbon in a changing climate.

Consequently, just as there are synergies and trade-offs between global and local ecosystem services, there are synergies and trade-offs between mitigation and adaptation:

In order to ensure that ecosystems like forests will be able to contribute to the adaptation of broader society and to provide multiple co-benefits, EbA must reduce current threats