• Aucun résultat trouvé

Evaluating innovative scenarios to enhance mixed crop-livestock farms sustainability

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Evaluating innovative scenarios to enhance mixed crop-livestock farms sustainability"

Copied!
15
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HAL Id: hal-01210117

https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01210117

Submitted on 3 Jun 2020

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

Evaluating innovative scenarios to enhance mixed crop-livestock farms sustainability

Julie Ryschawy, Alexandre Joannon, Annick Gibon

To cite this version:

Julie Ryschawy, Alexandre Joannon, Annick Gibon. Evaluating innovative scenarios to enhance mixed crop-livestock farms sustainability: A partnership methodology based on long-term farmers’ strategies.

11. International Farming System Association Meeting, Humboldt University of Berlin. DEU., Apr 2014, Berlin, Germany. 143 p. �hal-01210117�

(2)

J Ryschawy *, A Joannon, A Gibon

* INRA INPT-ENSAT, UMR AGIR, FRANCE

Evaluating innovative scenarios to enhance mixed crop-livestock farms

sustainability.

A partnership methodology based on long-term farmers’ strategies

11th European IFSA Symposium

1-4 April 2014 in Berlin, Germany

(3)

A mutual objective on mixed-crop livestock

The Coteaux de Gascogne ’ A French less-favoured area

 Low specialization of agriculture (50% of farms MCLS)

Mutual objective : Evaluating scenarios including technical innovations that could enhance sustainability of MCLS.

Local actors : Which future for their MCLS farms?

Research : Worldwide regain of interest in MCLS

Crops Livestock

(4)

A specific Local Group of Partners

 Knowledge on the area

4 municipalities involved

56 farms surveyed

Databases on farmers’ practices

Historical data on farms since 1950

 A new partnership working with local actors for our study :

15 farmers within the 56 surveyed

their local advisors

2 mayors within the 4 municipalities

Membership on a voluntary basis

Basic requirements

1. Transparency :

collective steps definition and evaluation, reports, vote, …

2. Stability of the group

3. Freedom of expression and respect : post-its, gathering opinions, mediation,…

4. Enthusiasm!

T rust elaboration

(5)

S T EP 1 - Co nce ptu al isa tion

Oct 2010 - May 2011 June 2011 to June 2012

ST EP 2 - Ex pl ora tion ST EP 3 - Eva lu atio n

b - Identification of: technical

scenarios a- Relevant

long-term strategies

Exploration of the technical

scenarios

Collective assessment of the simulations

KEY

Local actors : Individual

Collective

Researchers:

Individual

Collective

Computer model

Interactions

(6)

Step 1a : A retrospective study of farmers ’ strategies

 Studying farmers’ long-term strategies as a useful material for future studies

Innovations linked to their strategies

 Typology of past farms trajectories from 1950 to 2005

- 50 farms considered - 2 collective meetings - 12 individual surveys

Type Autonomy-led farmers (13 farms)

“If you want something done right, do it yourself”

Type Diversified family-farmers (8 farms)

“Don't put all your eggs in one basket”

(7)

o Whole participatory process with farmers & actors :

o 3 collective meetings of 3 hours

o Technical innovations in line with farmers long term strategies to maintain MCLS

Methodology

Step 1.c : Participatory definition of prospective scenarios

A. A « post-its meeting » : 5 post-it / partner

« What is worrying you concerning the future of your farm? »

(8)

Type Autonomy-led farmers

Scenario : sowing forage legumes intercrops to achieve autonomy for herd feeding

Type Diversified family-farmers

Scenario : adding a finishing unit of heifers to achieve direct sales

B. Collective organisation of the post-its :

« Which major uncertainties within the local context? »

Step 1.b : Participatory definition of prospective scenarios

C. Vote to select two scenarios (and two real-farms)

« How could we change our practices to adapt to those

uncertainties? » Scenarios of technical innovations

(9)

S T EP 1 - Co nce ptu al isa tion

Oct 2010 - May 2011 June 2011 to June 2012

ST EP 2 - Ex pl ora tion ST EP 3 - Eva lu atio n

b - Identification of: technical

scenarios a- Relevant

long-term strategies

Exploration of the technical

scenarios

KEY

Local actors : Individual

Collective

Researchers:

Individual

Collective

Computer model

Interactions

(10)

• Precision of farmers’ wishes:

Two types of intercrops to insert in the rotation

• Identification of major constraints:

Periods of sowing and harvesting / work organisation

Feeding quality and low costs

Legumes intercropping : pure or mixed species

S1 : Red clover and oat-vetch intercrops / S2 : Premium on red clover Farm selected : typical MCLS of the area

A farmer deeply involved in the process

133 ha - 50% crops & 50 % grasslands

43 suckler cows – Limousine breed

1 Working Unit

Step 2 : Scenario exploration with the farmer

Focus of Type Autonomy-led farmer - Intercropping

(11)

o Simulation with the farmer through a simple computer-based tool

5 to 6 visits of 3-4 hours to specificy the technical scenarios

Time at the lab to adapt the model and prepare the simulations

Crop-Livestock Farm Simulator (CLIFS)

Supply-Demand balances At the farm scale

Farmer feedback CalculRation

Feeding need per type of animal

CalculFerti

Fertilisation need Per type of crops

Crop-Livestock Farm Simulator (CLIFS)

Supply-Demand balances At the farm scale

Farmer feedback

CalculFerti

Fertilisation need Per type of crops

Step 2 : Scenario exploration with the farmer

(12)

S T EP 1 - Co nce ptu al isa tion

Oct 2010 - May 2011 June 2011 to June 2012

ST EP 2 - Ex pl ora tion ST EP 3 - Eva lu atio n

b - Identification of: technical

scenarios a- Relevant

long-term strategies

Exploration of the technical

scenarios

Collective assessment of the simulations

KEY

Local actors : Individual

Collective

Researchers:

Individual

Collective

Computer model

Interactions

(13)

o Scenario presented by the farmer himself  motivating other farmers o Discussions on the technical routines and … on systemic thinking ! :

Step 3 : Collective evaluation of the results

Systemic thinking - “Everything isn’t always a race”

“The performance would be to know when you are spending too much to produce”.

New technical scenarios of pratices to better integrate crop and livestock at the farm scale?

(Argyris & Schön, 1996)

(14)

Strong involvement of local actors

• Interest in local adapted study

• Relevance of real cases

«For once, it was concrete and corresponded to our ideas »

• New discussions on work organisation

Collective evaluation

• Importance of collective meetings

• Posture of researchers

« We have been listened et could express our views. »

• Interactions research/local actors

« It is really interesting to share views with other core works »

Other professions could take an objective look at the local situation

For researchers, learning on contexts and realistic innovations

(15)

Time, enthustiasm & confidence in the process needed !

- Many time spent in organisation - Transparancy as a major rule !

Risks were taken «disturbing not to know where we were going»

Reflexivity of the researchers is essential

- First seen as an expert…then maybe as a partner ? - Does the research question really come from the actors ?!

Specific skills needed...Communication…

Which level of implication of the partners?

Adaptations of the group acccording to steps ...and whishes!

Technical discussions on local real-life farms!

From «out of pure curiosity» to involvement

Thank you ! !

My take-home message : Establishing a dialogue based on trust between all types of actors is not easy neither a sure thing

Lessons and limits

Références

Documents relatifs

Multicolor single-molecule localization microscopy (λSMLM) is a powerful technique to reveal the relative nanoscale organization and potential colocalization between different

[8] showed quadratic lower bounds under SETH for (3/2

In this section we discuss modeling VaR and related Market Risk measures (MRMs) via conditional quantiles and other techniques....

(Received 15 January 2015; revised manuscript received 15 March 2015; published 4 May 2015) It has been shown that the bosonic symmetry-protected-trivial (SPT) phases with pure

Avant de pouvoir mesurer une anomalie de ro- tation dans les cristaux d’hélium, nous devons faire des mesures en température de la fréquence de résonance et du facteur de qualité

Daluogu de Chaozhou : Chaotianzi (Audience impériale), dans 1983, Chaozhou da luogu (Grande musique de tambours et gongs de la région de Chaozhou), Beijing, Renmin yinyue, p.

Changes in the practice of storing forage crop residues (a), forage crops (b) according to the classes of mixed crop-livestock farming systems (see Table 1.1)...

An agropastoral diagnosis has highlighted 4 types of crop-livestock farms according to the degree of intensification and integration of production systems (Blanchard et al., 2018):