R ENDICONTI
del
S EMINARIO M ATEMATICO
della
U NIVERSITÀ DI P ADOVA
J AMES C. B EIDLEMAN
M. P ILAR G ALLEGO
Conjugate π-normally embedded fitting functors
Rendiconti del Seminario Matematico della Università di Padova, tome 80 (1988), p. 65-82
<http://www.numdam.org/item?id=RSMUP_1988__80__65_0>
© Rendiconti del Seminario Matematico della Università di Padova, 1988, tous droits réservés.
L’accès aux archives de la revue « Rendiconti del Seminario Matematico della Università di Padova » (http://rendiconti.math.unipd.it/) implique l’accord avec les conditions générales d’utilisation (http://www.numdam.org/conditions).
Toute utilisation commerciale ou impression systématique est constitutive d’une infraction pénale. Toute copie ou impression de ce fichier doit conte- nir la présente mention de copyright.
Article numérisé dans le cadre du programme Numérisation de documents anciens mathématiques
http://www.numdam.org/
Conjugate 03C0-Normally Fitting
JAMES C. BEIDLEMAN - M. PILAR GALLEGO
(*)
1. Introduction.
All groups considered in this paper
belong
to the class 8 of allfinite soluble groups. A
subgroup
.X of G isp-normally
embeddedin G if each of its
Sylow p-subgroups
is aSylow p-subgroup
of a normalsubgroup
of G. Asubgroup
X of G isnormally
embedded in G if it isp-normally
embedded for eachprime
p. If T is a Fischerclass,
then the
F-injectors
of G arenormally
embedded(see [10]). Fitting
classes whose
injectors
arenormally
embedded are callednormally
embedded
Fitting
classes. SuchFitting
classes have manyinteresting properties (see
forexample [7,11 ]) .
In
[3]
theconcept
ofFitting
functor is introduced as a mapf
which
assigns
to each G e 8 anon-empty
setf (G)
ofsubgroups
of Gsuch that
whenever a is a
monomorphism
of G into g with Motivationfor the definition of
Fitting
functor isprovided by injectors
and ra-dicals of
Fitting
classes. A number ofproperties
ofFitting
functorsare
developed
in[3, 4, 8].
AFitting
functorf
is calledp-normally
embedded
provided
thatf (G)
consists ofp-normally
embedded sub- groups of G for each G E 8.f
is said to benormally
embedded iff
is(*)
Indirizzodegli
AA.: J. C. BEIDLEMAN:Dept.
of Mathematics, Uni-versity
ofKentucky, Lexington, Kentucky
40506,U.S.A. ;
M. PILAR, GALLEGO : Fac. Ciencias Matematicas, Universidad deZaragoza,
50009Zaragoza, Spagna.
p-normally
embedded for allprimes
p.Normally
embeddedFitting
functors are classified in Satz 6.4 and Satz 7.4 of
[3].
In this paper we
study
ageneralization
of the mentionedconcepts
which results from
considering
sets ofprimes
and Halli-subgroups
instead of
prime numbers p
andSylow p-subgroups.
We restrict ourselves to thoseFitting
functorsf
for whichf(G)
is aconjugacy
class of
subgroups
of G for all G E8,
the so-calledconjugate Fitting
functors.
Let
f
be aconjugate Fitting functor,
G E8,
V Ef (G), Vn
EHall~ (V)
and
Vn Gn
EHall., (G). By
a result in[8],
if andonly
ifVn
EHallyr
This resultprovides
motivation forstudying conju- gate n-normally
embeddedFitting
functors. In section 3 we obtaina number of
properties
ofconjugate n-normally
embeddedFitting
functors. For
example, f
isn-normally
embedded if andonly
if eachmember of the Lockett section of
f
isn-normally
embedded. Letn =
U
Thenf
isyr-normally
embedded if andonly
iff
is
ni-normally
embedded and£n[(f)
==£n(f) 8nj
for all i E I. Let I bean index set and let A E
I}
be apartition
ofP,
the set of allprimes.
AFitting functor g
is said to beI-normally
embeddedif g
is embedded for each À e I.
I-normally
embedded Fit-ting
functors are classified.Moreover,
iff
is aconjugate 1-normally
embedded
Fitting functor,
then adescription
off ,~ ,
the smallest mem-ber of the Lockett section
of f,
is obtained. This answers open que- stion 7 of[4].
Section 4 is devoted to the
study
ofn-normally
embeddedFitting
classes Y. Y is
n-normally
embedded if andonly
if isn-normally
embedded.
Further,
if Y isn-normally embedded,
then is adominant
Fitting
class.2. Preliminaries.
A
Fitting functor
is amapping f
whichassigns
to each group G from 8 anon-empty
setf (G)
ofsubgroups
of G such that ifG,
Hbelong
to 8 and a : G - H is a
monomorphism
with thenFor
simplicity
of notation we writea( f (G))
=a(G)
r1f(H).
AFitting
functor
f
is calledconjugate provided
thatf (G)
consists of aconjugacy
class of
subgroups
of G for all G E S. AFitting
functorf
is calledp-normally embedded,
p aprime number, provided
thatf (G)
consistsof
p-normally
embeddedsubgroups
of G for all G E S.f
is said to benormally
embedded if it isp-normally
embedded for each P is the set of allprimes. f
is said to bepronormal
if thesubgroups
inf (G)
are
pronormal
in G for all G E S.If Y is a
Fitting class,
thenRady (G)
_ andInjy (G)
_- is an
Y-injector
ofG}
define twoconjugate Fitting
functors:Injy
andRady.
If Y =8n ,
the class of all a-groups from8, a
a setof
primes,
then we shall writeHalln
insteadInjy. Moreover,
we denoteby
JY’ the class of allnilpotent
groups from8,
andI’(G) =
theFitting subgroup
of G.In the remainder of this section we
present
a number of known results which are used in the later two sections of this paper.PROPOSITION 2.1
([3];
3.7 and3.8). If f
is aFitting functor
and nis a set
of primes,
then the class£n(f) of
groups G such that X has a’-index in Gfor
all X inf (G)
is aFitting
class and£n(f)
=£n(f).
PROPOSITION 2.2
([8]; 2.3).
Letf
be aconjugate Fitting functor,
G E
8,
X Ef (G), Xn
E Halln(X) and Gn
EHalln (G)
such thatGn.
Then the
following properties
areequivalent:
(a)
Halln-subgroup of
some normalsubgroup of
G.(d) Xn
is a Halln-subgroup of
New
Fitting
functors frompreviously given
ones can be obtainedusing
PROPOSITIO.,N 2.3
([3] ; 4.1, 4.7,
4.11 and4.15). (a)
Letf
and g beFitting functors
anddefine ( f o g) (G)
-~X :
X Ef ( Y) for
some Y Eg(G)I,
G E S. Then
fog
is aFitting functor. Moreover, if f
and g areconjugate,
then
fog
isconjugate.
(b)
Let be afamily of pronormal conjugate Fitting functors
and
define
there exists aSylow system
of
Greducing
intoXa, for
all A E G E 8.Then
conjugate Fitting
kEN
(c)
Letf
and g beFitting functors. f
and g are said to commuteif for
each G ES,
X Y = Y.x’ whenever X Ef (G),
Y Eg(G)
and there isa
Sylow system of
0reduoing
into X and Y.By
the characteristicof f
is meant
lp
E ll’: there is G c 8 and X Ef (G)
such that p divides Iet be afamily of pronormal conjugate pairwise. commuting I’itting f unctors of disjoint
characteristics andde f ine
Ithere exists a
Sylow system ot
Greducing
intof or
all GES.T hen
V
is apronormal conjugate .Fitting f nnetor.
AeA
(d)
Letf
and g beFitting functors
withf conjugate
and let a be aset
of primes. Define (f 0 g) (G)
={T:
there exists X Ef(Gcn(f»), Gn
En
E
Hall,,
such thatTIX
E G E S.(Note
thatGn
inthis
definition belongs
toHall,, (G).
Thisf ottows from
the Frattini-argument) .
Then
f
is aFitting functor. Moreover, if
g isconjugate,
thenn
f 0
g isconjugate.
3’t
Let
f
and g beFitting
functors.f
is said to bestrongly
containedin g, denoted
f « g, provided
that for each G ES,
thef olloWing
con-ditions hold:
(a)
If ~" Ef (G),
then there is a Y Eg(G)
such that XY,
and(b)
If W Eg ( G),
then there is a V Ef ( G )
such that V W.(If
f and
g areconjugate,
then(a)
and(b)
areequivalent.)
A
Fitting
functorf
is called a Lockettfunctor provided
that wheneverG E
S,
thenPROPOSITION 2.4
([4]; 4.2,
4.4 and4.6).
Let Y be aFitting
classand let
f
and g beFitting f unctors.
Then(a) If
Y is a Lockettclass,
thenInj.7
andRad.7
are Lockettf unctors.
(b) If f
and g are Lockettfunctors,
thenf o g
is also a Lockett(e) If f
and g are Lockettfunctors
andf
isconjugate,
thenf 0
gis a Lockett
f unctor.
"(d) If f
is a Lockettfunctor,
thenCn(f)
is a Lockett class.Let
f
be aconjugate Fitting
functor. Definef* by f * (G) _
T E
f (G
XG)~
for each G E S.(Here
n1 is theprojection
of G X G ontoits first
coordinate).
PROPOSITION 2.5
([4] ; 6.1, 6.2, 6.3,
6.4 and6.8) .
Letf
and g beconjugate I’itting functors.
Then(a) f*
is aconjugate
.Lockettf unctor.
(b) f
is a .Lockettf unctor i f
andonly if f
=f *.
(d)
be a setof primes.
Then _If f
is OrLockett
functor,
thenWe shall make use of the
following
lemma.LEMMA 2.6
([3]; 4.9).
Letsubgroups of
GE 8of pairwise relatively prime
orders. Assume thatgi H j = HiHi for
alli, j
E11, 2y
... ,n~ .
LetN2 , ... , Nn be
normalsubgroups of
G. Then(Hi
r~subgroup of
Gfor
alli, j
E{I, 2, ni
3.
x-normally
embeddedFitting
functors.This section is devoted to the
study
ofconjugate n-normally
embed-ded
Fitting
functors. Adescription
of such functors isgiven
in(3.3).
Let
f and g
beconjugate a-normally
embeddedFitting
functors. Themembers of Locksec
( f )
areconjugate n-normally
embeddedFitting
functors as seen in
(3.5). Further, (3.6)
shows thatf o g
is also such afunctor.
Let I be an index set and let
la(A):
Ac- 11
be apartition
of theprimes. Conjugate 7-normally
embeddedFitting
functors are clas-sified in
(3.14). Moreover,
iff
is aconjugate 1-normally
embeddedFitting functor,
then(3.17) gives
adescription
of the smallest memberf*
of Locksec( f ).
Such adescription
answers openquestion
7 of[4].
DEFINITION 3.1. Let a be a set of
primes.
(a)
Asubgroup
.X of a group G is said to ben-normally
embeddedin G if the Hall
a-subgroups
of X are Halln-subgroups
of a normalsubgroup
of G.(b)
AFitting
functorf
is said to ben-normally
embeddedprovided
that for G e 8 and X E
f (G),
X isyr-normally
embedded in G.As a consequence of
Proposition
2.2 we obtain thefollowing
REMARK 3.2. Let
f
be aconjugate Fitting
functor.(a) f
isn-normally
embedded if andonly
if for each G E S andX~
E thenXn
E Hall,,(b) f
isn-normally
embedded if andonly
if for each G E S andXn
E then whereGn
E Hall,.,(G)
such thatXn Gn.
Due to in
(3.2 ), n-normally embedding
ofconjugate Fitting
func-tors is very much related to the
E,,( )-construction.
This can be seenin the
following results,
a number of which aregeneralizations
of re-sults in
[3]
and[4]
for the case{p}.
PROPOSITION 3.3. Let
f
be aconjugate Fitting f unctor
and let n bea set
of primes.
Then(a) If f
isn-normally embedded,
thenf « Injcn(f).
(b) f
isn-normally
embeddedif
andonly i f ;
1,(c)
Let be a collectionof
setsof primes
such thatThen
f
isn-normally
embeddedif
andonly if f
isnrnormally
and
PROOF.
(a)
Assume thatf
isn-normally
embedded. Let G ES,
and
Halln (X).
Thenby part (a)
of(3.2 ), Xn E Halln
Let and such that Since
== the of G have n-index in G and so
Gnl
is contained in some£,n(f)-injector
ofG,
say TT. It now follows that X = and hence(a )
f ollows .(b )
LetBy part (d)
of(2.3), h(G) _
Assume that
f
isn-normally
embedded. Let G ES,
X Ef (G)
andBy part (a)
of(3.2),
LetXnl E Hallnl (X )
andG~, E Hallnl ( G)
such thatGn,.
Then.X = and hence
1«
h.Conversely,
assume that1« h.
Let andXn e
Let such that Let
K = and let =
F(GjK),
theFitting subgroup
ofG/.g.
Then and hence W. Thus
Xn(X
nK)
_Since
f
isconjugate
andI
is a
n’-number,
we haveXnK
E£n(f)
and so K. ThusXn
EE
Halln (K)
since K ELn(f). Therefore, f
isn-normally
embedded.(c)
Assume thatf
isn-normally
embedded and let i E I. Sinceni
snit
follows that£n(f)
c~~i( f ).
Let G E ef (G), Xni
EHalln, (X)
and
Xn
E Halln(X)
such that Sincef
isn-normally
embed-ded we have This
yields
thatXni E
E
Hallni (X
nS Hallni (GLni(f))
and hencef
isni-normally
em-bedded
by (3.2). Moreover,
Therefore,
if thenHallni (G) = (G)
andthis means that G E On the other
hand,
=2
8nj
and it follows thatf.,ni(f)
=8nj .
-Conversely,
assume thatf
isni-normally
embedded and =-
£n (f) 8nj
for all i E I. Let G E8, X
Ef (G)
andXn
E Halln(X).
Wenote that
Therefore,
the Hallni-subgroups
of X are contained in forall i E I. Since it follows that
E
Hall,, (GCnU»)
andso f
isn-normally
embedded.EXAMPLES 3.4.
(a)
Let 0 be a set ofprimes
and let i c 0. ThenHaflo,
y andInjsnsn’
aren-normally
embedded.-
(b )
AFitting
functorf
is called a normatFitting functor if,
foreach G e
8, f (G)
containsonly
normalsubgroups. By ([3]; 7.5) f
isa normal
Fitting
functor if andonly
if there is afamily
ofFitting
clas-ses such that These functors are
just
theP-normally
embeddedFitting
functors.Thus,
if n is a set ofprimes
and
f
is a normalFitting functor,
thenf
isn-normally
embedded.(c)
Let pand q
be distinct{p, q},
Y ==S1)Sq
andf
=Injy.
Let G E S.By Proposition
3.2 of[11]
it follows thatThen
f
isp-normally
embedded andq-normally embedded,
= 8and so
f
is nota-normally
embeddedby part (c)
of(3.3).
Let
f
be aconjugate Fitting
functor.By
the Lockett section off,
denoted Locksec
( f ),
is meant~g : g
is aconjugate Fitting
functor andg* = f *~ .
A number of results of Locksec
( f )
are established in[4].
Forexample, f
isp-normally
embedded if andonly
iff *
isp-normally
embed-ded
([4]; 6.5).
We nowgeneralize
this result to the case ofn-normally
embedded
Fitting
functors.PROPOSITION 3.5. Let
f
be aconjugate Fitting f unctor
and let n bea set
of primes. Then, f
isn-normally
embeddedif
andonly if f*
isa-normally
embedded.Thus, if f
isn-normally embedded,
then eachmember
o f
Locksec(f)
isn-normally
embedded.PROOF.
By part (a)
of(2.5) f*
is aconjugate Fitting
functor.Since = is a Lockett class and ==
by part (d)
of(2.~ ),
it follows thatis a Lockett functor. Thus
Assume that
f
isa-normally
embedded. Thenf
« hby part (b)
of
(3.3)
and hencef *
« h* = hby part (c)
of(2.5 ).
Due topart (b)
of
(3.3) again, f *
isn-normally
embedded.Conversely,
y assume thatf *
isyr-normally
embedded. Thenf * « h by part (b )
of(3.3).
Sincef « f * by part (c )
of(2.5),
it follows thatf « h
and sof
isa-normally
embedded.The next four results are concerned about the constructions in
(2.3) being jl-normally
embedded.PROPOSITION 3.6. Let
f and g be conjugate I’itting f unctors,
jl a setof primes
and G E S.If
X isa-normally
embeddedin Y and Y is
a-normally
embedded inG,
then X is1t-rwrmally
embed-ded in G. In
particular, if f and g
aren-normally embedded,
thenfog
is
n-normally
embedded.PROOF. Let .L denote the of G. Then Y n L E
g(.L) and, by
theFrattini-argument,
there existsGn
EHall. (G)
such thatNG(y
nL). Hence G.
n Y n L eHalln ( Y
n.L)
cHall,, (L)
since.L E
£n(g),
and so L s Y. Since Y isa-normally
embedded inHalln ( Y)
cHalln (L) by (2.2). Therefore, Gn
n L EHall. (Y).
Let
c- Hall,, (~).
Then thereexists y
E Y such that nL)v.
Since X Ef ( Y)
and .X isa-normally
embedded inY,
it follows
by (2.2 )
thatSince the of L r1 Y is a characteristic
subgroup
of L n Yand Y n
Lfl(Y
n it follows thatGn
normalizes(L
r1This means that
By part (a)
of(2.3) f og
is aconjugate
Fit-ting
functor. Henceby (2.2) Xn
EHall.,
and soXn
is a-nor-mally
embedded. Thiscompletes
theproof.
LEMMA 3.7. Let G E
8, Gn
EHall,, (G)
andX,
Ysubgroups of
Gsuch that X r1
Gn
EHall,, (X),
Y r1Gn
EHall., (Y)
andX,
Ya-normally
embedded in G. Then
(a)
X n Y nGn
EHall,, (X
r1Y)
and X n Y isa-normally
em-bedded.
(b) If
X YG,
then X Y r1Gn
EHall,, (X Y)
and X Y is n-nor-mally
embedded.PROOF. Since X and Y are
n-normally
embedded inG,
there exist normalsubgroups
M and N of G such that X n011, =
n011,
and.X Y is
a-normally
embedded.As a consequence of
parts (b)
and(c)
of(2.3)
and(3.7),
we obtainthe
f ollowing
result.PROPOSITION be a
family of pronormal conjugate Fitting functors,
and ~c a setof primes.
(a) If
thefunetors
aren-normally embedded,
thenn f ~,
is a
a-normally
embeddedconjugate Fitting functor.
AeA(b) If
thef unctors
aren-normally
embeddedfunctors of pairwise disjoint
characteristics andpairwise commuting,
thenVfa
isa
n-normally
embeddedconjugate Fitting f unetor.
ac-APROPOSITION 3.9. Let
f,
g beconjugate Fitting f unctors
and let0,
nbe sets
of primes.
(a)
c 0 and g isa-normally embedded,
thenf D
g isa-normally
embedded.
-
0
(b)
c Of andf
isa-normally embedded,
thenf 0
g is n-nor-mally
embedded. 0PROOF. Let G E
8,
T E(f D g)(G).
Then there exist .X Ef(G£8(f»)
0
and
Go
EHallo ( G )
such thatGo N~ (.~’)
andTIX
Eg(GoXjX).
(a)
Assume that n c 0 and g isn-normally
embedded. LetTnEHa1k(T).
Then there existsGn e Halln (G)
such thatE
Hall. (GoX).
Since EHall,, (TjX), GNXIX
EHalln (GOXIX)
and g
isa-normally embedded,
it follows thatMoreover,
Because of
part (b )
of(3.2) f Q
g isn-normally
embedded.e
(b)
Assumethat n C
0’ andf
isn-normally
embedded. ThenHall. (T)
=Halln (X).
LetXn
EHall,, (~Y’)
and let .M =GC8(f). By
part (a)
of(3.2),
X, EHalln (Ln(f)). Therefore, f 0
g isn-normally
embedded. This
completes
theproof.
0Let I be an index set such that
a
non-empty
set ofprimes,
whenever
~,1 ~ À~ .
DEFINITION 3.10. A
Fitting
functorf
is said to beI-normally
embedded if
f
isn(k)-normally
embedded for each I E I.REMARKS 3.11.
(a)
For I = P and =={p}
one has in(3.10)
the definition of
normally
embeddedFitting
functor.(b)
Iff
is aconjugate Fitting functor,
then it follows frompart (c)
of
(3.3)
thatf
isI-normally
embedded if andonly if,
for each A E Iand each
f
isp-normafly
embedded andL1’(I)
=~~(~,) ~~, .
In
particular, if f is I-normally embedded,
thenf
isnormally
embedded.DEFINITION 3.12. Let G e 8
and,
for each letA collection of
subgroups ~H(~,) :
is called anI-Sylow system
associated with
~N( ~, ) :
 E1 ~
if thef ollowing
holds:We note that for I = P and
n(p)
=(3.12)
is theconcept
ofgeneralized Sylow system
due to Fischer(see [5]).
LEMMA 3.13. Let G and let E
I}
be a collectionof
normalsubgroups of
G. Then(a)
There is anI-Sylow system of
G associated with the normalsubgroups ~N(7~) :
A EI} of
G.(b) Any
two suchsystems
areconjugate.
(c)
Let~.H(~,) : ~,
E11 be
anI-Sylow system associated
with~N(~,) :
~, E I~
and let Da G. Then~H(~,)
n D: Â E1~
is anI-Sylow system of
Dassociated with the normal
subgroups ~N(~,)
r’1 D: AEI} of
D.PROOF.
(a)
Let E be aSylow system
ofG,
k E I and _=
N(~,)
withSn().)
the Hall of G in Z. Then EE Let
A,
ft E I. Then =and
it followsfrom
(2.6)
that This shows that~H(~,) :
A EI}
is an
I-Sylow system
of G associated with~N(~,) : 7}.
(b)
Let G E S and{H(k) : k
E1}
be anI-Sylow system
of G asso-ciated with the normal
subgroups ~N(~,) :
À E7}
of G. Since G is a finite group and~~(~,) :
is apartition
ofP,
there is a finite set{ Â1, ... , kn}
c I such that all theprime
divisors of the order of Gbelong
Let H =
H(k1)
...H(kn)
G. It is clear that E i=lE
(H)
for all i E{1,
...,n~ . By
a result of section 3 of P. Hall[9], H(Âi),
1 i n, ispart
of aSylow system
of H. There-fore,
there exists aSylow system 27
of G such that =H,
i s n. Thus
.g(~,) G~(~,)
where6~)
e 27 for all A EI,
and so =
G n().) n N(l)
for allSo we have
proved
that eachI-Sylow system
of G associated with has the form~G~(~,) n N(~,) :
for someSylow system E
of G. The result follows from theconjugacy
of theSylow systems
of G.(c)
This follows from(2.6).
The next theorem characterizes
conjugate I-normally
embeddedFitting
functors.THEOREM 3.14.
(a)
Let À EI}
be af amily of Fitting
classes.Then
f
is aconjugate I-normally
embedded I’it-ting f unctor
andLn(k)(f) = X(k)Sn(k), for
each À E 1.(b) If f
is aconjugate 1-normally
embeddedFitting functor.,
thenPROOF.
(a)
For each G E8,
letis an
I-Sylow system
of Gassociated with
By (3.13) f
is aconjugate I-normally
embeddedFitting
functor. $It is clear that = and that
~~(~,)( f )
==- _
~(~,) ~~(~), .
Further it follows thatf
=V (Halloo
Ael
(b)
Asf
andV
areconjugate Fitting functors,
the result follows from
part (a)
of(3.2).
By part (b )
of(3.11)
and Satz 7.4 of[3]
we obtain thefollowing
theorem.
THEOREM 3.15. Let
f
be anI-normally
embeddedFitting functor.
Then
f
is the unionof conjugate I-normally
embeddedFitting functors.
Let
f
be aconjugate I-normally
embeddedFitting
functor.By (3.5)
each member of Locksec
( f )
is also aconjugate I-normally
embeddedFitting
functor. Sincef
is aconjugate normally
embeddedfunctor,
it follows from
part (a)
of(7.7)
and(7.9)
of[4]
that Locksec( f )
hasan
element f*
such thatf*« g
for all g E Locksec( f ). Open
ques- tion 7 of[4]
is togive
adescription
off,~.
In Theorem 3.17 such adescription
ispresented.
We first establish the next routine lemma.LEMMA 3.16. Let
f
and g beconjugate I-normally
embeddedFitting
PROOF. Assume that for each
By (3.14)
we conclude that
t « g.
Conversely,
y assume thatf « g.
Let A c- I and let G ELn(Â)(!).
Letand let
Y~(~,)
E( Y).
Then(G).
Sincef « g,
there exists such that and henceVn(Â)E
E
Halln(Â) ( U).
This means that for each’
THEOREM 3.17. Let
f
be aconjugate I-normally
embeddedFitting
PROOF. For each I E
I,
letJl(1)
=(~~(~,)( f )),~
and let h =V (Halloo
k E I
By part (a)
of(3.14) h
is aconjugate 1-normally
embeddedFitting
functor andE,(11)(h)
_~(~,) ~~(~,).
for each  e I.By part (d)
of
(2.5)
we havefor each A E I.
By (3.14)
it follows that h* =/*
and hence h E E Locksec( f ).
Let
By part (d)
of(2.5),
we seeeach
By (3.16) h « g
for allg E Locksee ( f )
and h.This
completes
theproof.
Using
thedescription
off *
in(3.17),
it follows thatf *
=foRad
where
f
=Hall~ .
This answers the test case inproblem
7 of[4].
4.
normally
embeddedFitting
classes.Let a be a set of
primes. A Fitting
class Y is said to beembedded
provided
thatInjy
is ayr-normally
embeddedFitting
func-tor. In this section we
generalize
a number of known results for x ={P}
(see [7]).
Forexample,
we show in(4.2)
that aFitting
class Y isa-normary
embedded if andonly
if is an-normally
embeddedFitting
class.PROPOSITION 4.1..Let Y be a
n-normally
embeddedFitting
class.Then
(a) If
G E8,
then anof
GGn,
EHall,,, ( G ) .
(b)
dominantFitting
class.PROOF.
(a)
Let V be anY-injector
ofG, Vn
EHall,, (V)
andVn,
eHalln, (V). Further,
letGn
EHall~ (G)
andGn,
eHall,,, (G)
suchthat and
Gn,.
SinceInjy
isn-normally embedded,
Y~ == Gn
nTherefore,
is a
subgroup
of G.By Proposition
4.4 of[11],
is aninjector
of G.’ ’
(b)
SinceIn17
isn-normally embedded,
it follows from(3.9)
that =
Injy 0 Injsn’
isa-normally
embedded. Hence we mayassume that T =
Let G G such that H e Y. We show that H is a
subgroup
of anY-injector
of G. LetFIGY
be theFitting subgroup
of Since
,~ ~~, _ ,~ ,
andFIGY
EJY’,
we have E8n.
Moreover H n
GIGG
and so H r1 F -:1 a G. H nI’ a H
andso H n Therefore g n F =
Gy
which isan Y-injector
of F.By
Lemma 4 of[6],
~ is an5;--injector
of HF. Let P EHall,, (HF)
and Hn E Hall,,
(H)
such that P.By part (b)
of(3.2),
we haveand so Hn Since E Hall,,
and
8n,
This means thatand hence centralizes
FIGY. Therefore,
F r) H -Gy
and it follows that H for some
Gnl E Halln’ ( G ) .
SinceY8n, = Y, C~(,~ ) _ ,~ by Proposition
3.1 of[11]. By (a)
isan
Y-injector
of G and so theproof
iscomplete.
THEOREM 4.2.
Fitting
class and i a setof primes.
Thena-normally
embeddedif
andonly if
isn-normally
embedded.PROOF. Assume that Y is
yr-normally
embedded.Then, by part (a)
of
(4.1 ), InjCnUF) (G)
= EHall,,, (G)l
and so isa-normally
embedded.Conversely,
assume that isa-normally
embedded.By part (b)
of
(4.1) £n(Y)
is dominant. Let V be anY-injector
of G.Since V is
an Y-injector
ofV,
it follows that Esince is dominant. This means that
Halloo
and since isn-normally
embedded and haveTherefore,
Y isn-normally
embedded.The next
proposition gives
three necessary conditions for Y to bea-normally
embedded. Notethat,
in thethey
areall satisfied for every Y.
PROPOSITION 4.3. Let Y be a
Fitting class, n
a setof primes
andconsider the
following properties
(a)
Y isn-normally
embedded.(c)
T he groups in have normalF-injectors.
Then
(a) implies (b), (b) implies (c)
and(c) implies (d).
PROOF.
(a)
~(b).
This is due topart (c)
of(3.3).
(b)
~(c). Suppose
for a contradiction that G is a group of minimal order such that G E and an:F-injector
of G is not a normalsubgroup
of G. Let us consider Theorem 1.1 of
[1]
and M = S.The
subgroups S
in theproof
of this theorem containGy
and hence8n. Therefore,
thearguments
on theminimality
of G arevalid here and it follows that G = MY where M is the
unique
maximalnormal
subgroup
ofG,
V EInjF (G),
.M r1 V = is a non-trivial q-group and
where p and q
are distinctprime
numbers. Since
Ge Y8n,
we haver1
~~(,~ )
= Y. Thus =Gy
and soG ~ ~~(,~ ) ~p,,
But Vhas
q-index
in G andconsequently
G E~(3~),
contradiction.(c)
~(d).
Assume that the groups inY8n
have normalY-injectors.
In
particular,
the groups in8n
have normalF-injectors.
SinceInjF n
8n =InjFoHalln,
we have that F n isstrictly
normal inBy
Theorem 4.7of [2],
it follows that,~ n ~~ _ ~1 ~
or(~n8~)*=§~.
This means that Y c
8n,
or8n c
Y*.In the next
example
it is shown that(d)
does notimply (c).
EXAMPLE 4.4. Let n =
{2, 3}
and let Y =§~§3~.
Let G =- Cb 1 ( C3 1 C2)
whereCp
is thecyclic
group of order p. Then0,,(G)
=1,
G E andInjy (G)
=Hall3, (G).
Thus Gdoes not have normal
Y-injectors
Y.The next result is used to establish another
equivalent property
to
(2.2)
in the casef
=Inj y, Y
aFitting
class.LEMMA 4.5. Let Y be a
Fitting
class and n a setof primes.
ThenRadFoInjFSn
=PROOF. Let us write
f
=RadFoInjFSn and g
=Let GE 8 and
g~-
where H eBy Proposition
3.2 of[11]
there exist and E
Hall,, (G)
such that and .g =WG:n;.
Since it follows that and so r1 nW(G:n;
r1H~-).
Hence we have thatH~-
r1 EHall,,
Hy
n andHy
Ef (G)
and so,by (2.2), By
n More-over,
by part (b)
ofProposition
4.4 of[3],
Therefore, W ~
nG~)
and since W is anF-injector
of it follows that Sincef
and g
areconjugate Fitting functors,
the result follows.Let V be an
F-injector
of G. Then V r1 is an!F-injector
of
and, by
theFrattini-argument,
the Halln-subgroups
ofn are Hall
n-subgroups
of G. SinceV ~
if then there exists such that
and Under these circumstances we have
PROPOSITION 4.6. The
following
areequivalent (a)
V isn-normally
embedded in GPROOF. Assume that V is
a-normally
embedded in G and let L denote the of G. Thenby (2.2)
and=
Conversely,
letVn ±
andVn(V
nL)
E Y. ThenE)
which is an
FSn-injector
of Gby Proposition (3.2)
of
[11].
Hence the Y-radical of nL)
contains nL). By (4.5),
and so From(2.2)
we conclude that V isn-normally
embedded.Let Y be a
Fitting
class and ~z a set ofprimes. Y
is said tosatisfy
conditions a
provided
that for all G E8, Vn
EHaflnoInjy ( G),
thereexists such that and
V,, Gy c- 5;’.
COROLLARY 4.7. Let a be a set
of primes
and let Y be aFitting
classsatisfying
condition a. Then Y isn-normally
embedded.PROOF. Assume that Y satisfies condition a and let G be of mi- nimal order such that Y~ is not normal in
Gn
for someOn E Halln (G),
andV E Inj:¡; (G).
Let .L denote the of G. V is anY-injector
of nL)
andNa(Y
nL)
has n’-index in G.
Thei ef ore, by minimality
ofG,
and hence
Gy =
V n .L. This contradicts thehypothesis
of(4.6)
andconsequently F
isn-normally
embedded.REFERENCES
[1]
J. C. BEIDLEMAN - B. BREWSTER, Strictnormality in Fitting
classes I, J.Algebra,
51 (1978), pp. 211-217.[2]
J. C. BEIDLEMAN - B. BREWSTER, Strictnormality
inFitting
classes III, Comm. inAlgebra,
10 (7) (1982), pp. 741-766.[3]
J. C. BEIDLEMAN - B. BREWSTER - P. HAUCK,Fittingfunktoren in
end-lichen
auflösbaren Gruppen
I, Math. Z., 182 (1983), pp. 359-384.[4]
J. C. BEIDLEMAN - B. BREWSTER - P. HAUCK,Fitting functors in finite
solvable groups II, Math. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc., 101 (1987), pp. 37-55.
[5]
G. CHAMBERS,p-normally
embeddedsubgroups of finite
soluble groups, J.Algebra,
16 (1970), pp. 442-455.[6] R. S. DARK, Some
examples
in thetheory of injectors of finite
soluble groups, Math. Z., 127 (1972), pp. 145-156.[7] K. DOERK - M. PORTA, Über Vertauschbarkeit, normale
Einbettung
undDominanz bei
Fittingklassen
endlicherauflösbarer Gruppen,
Arch. Math.,35 (1980), pp. 319-327.
[8] M. P. GÁLLEGO, The radical
of
theFitting
classdefined by
aFitting functor
and a set
of primes,
Arch. Math., 48 (1987), pp. 36-39.[9]
P. HALL, On theSylow
systemsof
a soluble group, Proc. London Math.Soc., 43 (1937), pp. 316-323.
[10] B. HARTLEY, On Fischer’s dualization
of formation theory,
Proc. London Math. Soc., 19 (3) (1969), pp. 193-207.[11] F. P. LOCKETT, On the
theory of Fitting
classesof finite
soluble groups, Math. Z., 131 (1973), pp. 103-115.Manoscritto