• Aucun résultat trouvé

St. Lawrence Burns: gas analysis

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "St. Lawrence Burns: gas analysis"

Copied!
39
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Publisher’s version / Version de l'éditeur:

Vous avez des questions? Nous pouvons vous aider. Pour communiquer directement avec un auteur, consultez la première page de la revue dans laquelle son article a été publié afin de trouver ses coordonnées. Si vous n’arrivez pas à les repérer, communiquez avec nous à [email protected].

Questions? Contact the NRC Publications Archive team at

[email protected]. If you wish to email the authors directly, please see the first page of the publication for their contact information.

https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/droits

L’accès à ce site Web et l’utilisation de son contenu sont assujettis aux conditions présentées dans le site LISEZ CES CONDITIONS ATTENTIVEMENT AVANT D’UTILISER CE SITE WEB.

Internal Report (National Research Council of Canada. Division of Building Research), 1959-12-01

READ THESE TERMS AND CONDITIONS CAREFULLY BEFORE USING THIS WEBSITE. https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/copyright

NRC Publications Archive Record / Notice des Archives des publications du CNRC :

https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/view/object/?id=c9be9d14-55ea-4ccd-8e61-ba5aa2ac5ea7 https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/voir/objet/?id=c9be9d14-55ea-4ccd-8e61-ba5aa2ac5ea7

NRC Publications Archive

Archives des publications du CNRC

For the publisher’s version, please access the DOI link below./ Pour consulter la version de l’éditeur, utilisez le lien DOI ci-dessous.

https://doi.org/10.4224/20338311

Access and use of this website and the material on it are subject to the Terms and Conditions set forth at

St. Lawrence Burns: gas analysis Jutras, J. R.

(2)

NATIONAL RBSFARCH COUNCIL CANADA D I V I S I O N OF B U I L D I N G FU3SEARCH S T . LA~flRENCF BURNS GAS A N A L Y S I S by

J.R.

J u t r a s Report No. 157 of t h e

Division of Building Research

OTTAWA

(3)

PREFACE

The circumstances thg t l e d t o the c a r r y i n g out of f i r e t e s t s on e i g h t b u i l d i n g s i n t h e p r o j e o t known a s t h e S t , Lawrence Burns, and t h e ob j e o t i v e s and the ways i n whioh t h e s e were achieved a r e f u l l y d e s o r i b e d i n a g e n e r a l r e p o r t . It o o n s t i t u t e s t h e oornplete r e c o r d of t b planning and

e x e c u t i o n of the experiments, t o g e t h e r w i t h a l l g e n e r a l i f l o r m a t i o n . The d e t a i l s on eaoh k i n d of measurement made, i n c l u d i n g t h e r e s u l t s obtained, a r e oontained i n s e p a r a t e companion r e p o r t s of which t h i a i s one. A l l the r e s u l t s a r e combined and a r e d i s c u s s e d and f i n a l conolusions drawn

i n a summary r e p o r t .

D u p l i c a t i o n has been avoided aa f a r a s p o s s i b l e , and

it w i l l be necessary t o r e f e r t o t h e g e n e r a l r e p o r t i n r e a d i n g any of the o t h e r r e p o r t s i n c l u d i n g t h i s one f o r any information whioh i s p e r t i n e n t t o more t h a n one of them. A l i s t i n g of a l l r e p o r t s on t h e p r o j e c t f o l l o w s t h i s preface.

The p a r t i c i p a t i o n of the B r i t i s h J o i n t F i r e Researoh Organization i n t h e experiment, t h e i n t e r e s t end support of t h e F e d e r a l C i v i l Defence a u t h o r i t i e s , t h e a s s i s t a n a e of t h e O n t e r i o F i r e Marshal and h i s s t a f f , and f i n a l l y t h e complete co-operation and v e r y c o n s i d e r a b l e a s s i s t a n c e extended by t h e Hydro-Electric Power Commission of O n t a r i o a r e a l l g r a t e f u l l y aoknowledged. It i s a p l e a s u r e a l s o t o be able, t o r e c o r d t h e s p e o i a l c o n t r i b u t i o n made by members of the s t a f f of t h e F i r e

S e c t i o h who worked long hours, o f t e n under t r y i n g f i e l d o o n d l t i o n s and a t g r e a t p e r s o n a l inconvenience, t o meet t h e many d e a d l i n e s and t o aamplete t h e p r o j e c t I n a most s a t i s f a c t o r y manner.

The a u t h o r of t h i s r e p o r t i s D r . J o R , J u t r a s , r e s e a r a h o f f i c e r with t h e F i r e S e a t i o n of t h i s D i v i s i o n who was respon- s i b l e f o r t h e sampling and a n a l y s i s of room atmospheres during t h e experiment 8.

Ottawa

(4)

REPORTS

ON

THE ST. LAWRENCE BURNS

NO.

-

SUB-TITLE

General Report

Smoke and Sound Measurements Temperature Measurements Radiometer Measurements

V e n t i l a t i o n Rate Measurements Resistance Thermometer

Measurements

Radiant Temperature of Openings

AUTHOR G. W. S h o r t e r G. Williams-Leir G. Williams-Leir J. H. McGuire J. H. McGuire J.

H.

McGuire D. G. Stephenson Gas A n a l y s i s J. R. J u t r a s

Summary Report G. W. S h o r t e r and J. H. McGuire

(5)

ST. LAl7HENCE BUFLNS

GAS ANALYSIS

i! y

J.R. J u t r a s

Early i n 1958, a number of controlLed burning e x p e r i - ments were c a r r i e d out a t A u l t s v i l l e , Ontario, by t h e F i r e

Section of t h e Division of Building Research, National Research Council. The g e n e r a l d e t a i l s of t h e s e experiments, which i n - volved t h e burning of s i x dwellings and two l a r g e r b u i l d i n g s , a r e described i n t h e f i r s t of a s e r i e s of r e p o r t s published on

t h e S t . Lavcrence Burns (1).

I t was t h e purpose of these t e s t s t o study t h e develop- ment of f i r e i n b u i l d i n g s and t o determine, among o t h e r t h i n g s , how r a p i d l y a f i r e o r i g i n a t i n g on t h e ground f l o o r of a dwel- l i n g could a f f e c t t h e s u r v i v a l of occupants of u p s t a i r s bed- rooms. The f a c t o r s which have t h e most i n f l u e n c e on t h e time d u r i n g which such s u r v i v a l would remain a p o s s i b i l i t y a r e t h e h e a t d i s s i p a t e d during t h e f i r e and t h e v i t i a t i o n of t h e atmosa phere, e i t h e r through t h e accumulation of smoke o r through

changes i n t h e a i r composition.

Tdeasurements of temperatures a t v a r i o u s p o i n t s i n s i d e t h e dwellings and o f smoke d e n s i t y i n t h e bedrooms and c e l l a r have a l r e a d y been r e p o r t e d ( 2 , 3 ) . This r e p o r t d e s c r i b e s t h a t p a r t of t h e o p e r a t i o n concerned with t h e d e t e r m i n a t i o n of oxygen and carbon monoxide c o n c e n t r a t i o n s i n t h e two u p s t a i r s bedrooms ( o n e with t h e door open and t h e o t h e r w i t h t h e door c l o s e d ) and i n t h e c e l l a r of each of t h e s i x dwellings. Plan views ( P i g s . 1 t o

5 ,

7 ) show t h e l o c a t i o n of t h e two bedrooms i n each o f t h c (lwellings.

1. A n a l y t i c a l I n s t r ~ a n e n t a t i o n

-

';/hen thought VEI s given t o t h e i n s t r u m e n t a t i o n r e q u i r e d

f o r t h e gas a n a l y s i s , t h e f a c t that; the burns would be c a r r i e d out- a c c o r d i t ~ g t o a r i ~ i d schedule, probably a t t h e r a t e of one

3 day a t some tlis-tance from t h e l a b o r a t o r y , was a major consid-

(6)

sample a n a l y s i s w i t h a n a b s o r p t i o n a p p a r a t u s of t h e Orsa-t t,vpe a s was done i n Englalid (:luring s i m i l a r experiments

( 4 )

,

s-inoe a

rea at

numbel- oof Gas snmpl-es wou1.d. need t o be c o l l e c t e d i n evacuated g l a s s b o t t l e s and acc~.~rnul.ated o v e r a p e r i o d of f o u r t o f i v e d a y s , witil t h e adriec! I - i s l c of b r e a l r a ~ e s , le a k a g e s , and s o on. A l s o , t h i s me-thod ass not atlecyu.ate f o r measuring low c o n c e n t r a t i o n s of carbon monoxicit. a s rvas r e q u i r e d i n t h e p r e - s e n t experiments

.

The use of p o r t a b l e d i r e c t - r e a d i n g instx?~.men-ts s , p e c i a l l y designed f o r t h e a n a l y s i s of con-tinuously f l o w i n g samples

was

t h e r e f o r e i n d i c a t e d . 3uch i n s t r u m e n t s were known t o be a v a i l - a b l e f o r carbon monoxide and oxygen, t h e two g a s e s which have -the most s i g n i f i c a n c e when e v a l u a t i n g t h e time d u r i n g which a n

e n c l o s u r e o r room remains h a b i t a b l e . Two Carbon Monoxide I n d i - c a t o r s ( r a n g e 0 t o 0.15 p e r c e n t ) manufactured by Mine S a f e t y Appliances and one Beckman Oqrgen Analyzer, model C2P ( r a n g e 0 t o 25 p e r c e n t ) , were t h . e r e f o r e o b t a i n e d and were subsequent- l y rnounked on a t a b l e i n t h e heated t r a i l e r which s e r v e d

as

a n i n s t r u m e n t room d u r i n g t h e o p e r a t i o n . The a n a l y z e r was of t h e f a s t r e s p o n s e t y p e (95 p e r c e n t r e s p o n s e i n

7

s e c o n d s ) , but- t h e inclica-tors t o o k a s much a s 30 seconcis t o r e a c h e q u i l i b r i u m c o n d i t i o n s f o l l o w i n g a change i n carbon monoxide c o n c e n t r a t i o n . 2. Gas S a l n p l i n ~ - - . - - &

( a ) Sampling Sys-l-em

The g a s sampling t u b e ex-kencled from t h e bedrooms t o t h e i n s t r u m e n t t r a i l e r , which was g e n e r a l l y s e t a t a d i s t a n c e of a b o u t 100 f t from t h e house t o be burned. I t s f i r s t s e c t i o n c o n s i s t e d of 3/8-in. I D copper t u b i n g r u n n i n g h o r i z o n t a l l y from t h e c e n t r e of each bedroom t o a p o i n t approximately 1 f t o u t - s i d e t h e f r o n t w a l l of t h e house. This s e c t i o n was i n s t a l l - e d some time b e f o r e t h e burns. A second l e n g t h o f copper t u b i n g of t h e same s i z e was a t t a c h e d t o t h i s s e c t i o n immediately p r i o r t o t h e burn, and extended t h e sampling l i n e from t h e second f l o o r l e v e l t o t h e ground and a l o n g t h e ground f o r a d i s t a n c e of between 10 t o 20 f t from t h e house. Brom t h i s p o i n t o n , 1 / 4 - i n . I D IL'ygon f l e x i b l e t u b i n g was used and was connected a t t h e t r a i l e r t o t h e copper t u b i n g (1/4-in. I D ) l e a d i n g t o t h e a n a l y t i c a l system.

A g a s c o l l e c t o r ( P i g .

9)

was f i x e d t o t h e c o l l e c t i n g end of t h e system and c o n s i s t e d of a m e t a l can f i l l e d p a r t l y w i t h g l a s s wool t o remove smoke p a r t i c l e s from t h e g a s e s and p a r t l y w i t h calciixm c h l o r i d e t o remove e x c e s s moristure and p r e v e n t c l o g g i n g of t h e l i n e t h r o u g h f r e e z i n g .

(7)

( b ) Samplinz of Gases

The atmosphere of both bedrooms ( o r of t h e closed. bed- room and t h e c e l l a ~ ) was sampled s i m u l t a n e o u s l y , a s shown i n Fig. 10, a-t a c o n s t a n t r a t e o f 1.. c u f t p e r minu-be by means of two pressure-and-vacuum a i r purrips ( F i s h e r Bo. 1-093) l o c a t e d i n t h e t r a i l e r . The g a s e s were d i r e c t e d i n t o two r e s e r v o i r s ( 1 3 by 10 by 7 i n . ) b u i l t s e p a r a t e l y around each pump and t h e n vented t o t h e atmosphere. A t t h e s t a r t of t h e t e s - t , r e s e r v o i r

A was connected w i t h t h e open bedroom and r e s e r v o i r B w i t h t h e c l o s e d bedroom. A s soon a s t h e carbon monoxide c o n c e n t r a t i o n i n t h e fonrler room reached 1 . 5 p e r c e n t ( u n l e s s u n f o r e s e e n e v e n t s made it n e c e s s a r y t o end t h e t e s t s o o n e r ) , r e s e r v o i r A was con- n e c t e d with t h e c e l l a r .

The t o t a l volunle of each probe and r e s e r v o i r system was c a l c u l a t e d t o be 0.4 cu f t , which meant a time l a g o f 21 seconds i n t h e pumpins of -the p;ases from t h e house t o t h e t r a i l e r .

3. OxyPen Q--- Determination

Owins t o t h e f a s t response of tile oxygen a n a l y z e r , only one i n s t r u m e n t was r e q u i r e d t o f o l l o w t h e v a r i a t i o n s of oxygen concen-tration i n t h e two rooms. The a n a l y z e r was t h e r e f o r e

connected t o t h e two r e s e r v o i r s , and a two-way v a l v e enabled t h e o p e r a t o r t o switch from one t o t h e o t h e r a t r e g u l a r i n t e r v a l s of 30 seconds.

One adverse f e a t u r e of t h e f a s t response a n a l y z e r i s

t h a t i t s s e n s i n g element i s n o t i n t e r n a l l y p r o t e c t e d , and flow r a t e s of only 40 t o 60 cc/min. ( 2

x

10'3 cfm) a r e s p e c i f i e d . I n o r d e r t o a f f o r d t h e instrument proper p r o t e c t i o n and s t i l l keep t h e s a ~ n p l i n s l a g t o a minimum, samples viere pumped by means of a small c a p a c i t y purnp (Redmond) a t a r a t e of 0.04 cfm and t h e sampling l i n e was provided with a s h o r t by-pass f o r t h e a n a l y z e r . Throuch it a n a i r flow of 0.002 cfm was c o n t r o l l e d by a n e e d l e v a l v e and a I"1ov~~neter ( F i g . 1 0 ) . Y i t h t h i s system, t h e time l a g was found t o be n e g l i g i b l e (about 2 s e c o n d s ) .

4 .

Carbon Monoxide Determinations

--

The measurement of carbon monoxide c o n c e n t r a t i o n s neces- s i t a t e d t h e use of two i n d i c a t o r s because t h e i r low s e n s i t i v i t y would n o t have allowed s w i t c h i n g from one r e s e r v o i r t o t h e o t h e r a t r e g u l a r i n t e r v a l s of 30 seconds. One i n d i c a t o r was t h e r e f o r e branched permanently on each r e s e r v o i r and samples were drawl i n a t a c o n s t a n t r a t e of 0.16 cfm by means of t h e pump b u i l t i n t h e

instru.rnent. The time la: i n pumping. samples froln -the r e s e r v o i r s

t o t h e i n d i c a t o r s was n e ~ l i g i b l e ( 3 seconds). Carbon monoxide

c o n c e n t r a t i o n s were r e a d d i r e c t l y o f f t h e two i n d i c a t o r s every

(8)

I n o r d e r t o a l l o w , however, f o r t h e

measurement

of c o n c e n t r a t i o n s g r e a t e r t h a n 0.15 p e r c e n t ( t h e maximum range of t h e i n d i c a t o r s )

,

d i l u t i o n sys-terns were provided on each sampling l i n e ( F i g . 10) by w11ich a i r was brought i n from t h e o u t s i d e a t a r a t - e , p r e - s e t by Tic>ans of n e e d l e - v a l v e s , s u f f i c i e n t f o r a t e n - f o l d d i l u t i o n of t h e ~ a . n ! ) l e s . This enabled concen- t r a t i o n s of up t o

I-.

5

p e r c e n t carbon monoxide t o be de terrnined.

A c o n s t a n t t e m p e r a t u r e b a t h was a l s o added t o c o r r e c t f o r any infl.uence t h a t v a r i a - t i o n s i n o ~ x t s i d e a i r t e m p e r a t u r e mieht have on t h e g a s - a i r mixing r a t i o .

RESULTS

-

Oxygen and carbon monoxide c o n c e n t r a t i o n s have been determined a t each of t h e s i x burns i n v o l v i n g d w e l l i n g s . Read- i n g s a r e t a b u l a t e d i n 12ppeiidix -4.

Pollowine, c o r r e c t i o n s of a l l r e a d i n g s f o r t i m e l a g s of approximately 30 seconds i n t h e s a m p l i n ~ of t h e g a s e s a n d , i n t h e c a s e of t h e carbon monoxide d e t e r m i n a t i o n s , of a n a d d i t i o n a l

30 seconds t o account f o r t h e slow response of t h e irlciica.tors, t h e measured concentra t l o n s have been p l o t ted a g a i n s t time f o r

each b u m (Eies. 11 t o 1 6 ) t o show t h e i r a c t u a l v a r i a t i o n s d u r - i n g each t e s t . T h e i r mean v a r i a t i o n i n t h e drvellings l i n e d with combustible m a t e r i a l and i n t h o s e l i n e d with incombustible mater- i a l i s g r a p h i c a l l y s i ~ o m i n Il'igs.

1 ' 7

and 18, r e s p e c t i v e l y .

These graphs s h o i ~ t h a t t h e accumulation o f carbon monox- i d e and t h e c o r r e s p o n d i n g d e p l e t i o n of oxygen were q u i t e r a p i d i n t h e open bedrooms of d w e l l i n g s l i n e d w i t h combustible m a t e r i a l , r e a d i n g s of 1 p e r c e n t carbon monoxide and 1 0 p e r c e n t oxycen

b e i n g o b t a i n e d w i t h i n 2 1/2 minutes of t h e s t a r t of t h e t e s t . The c o r r e s p o n d i n g t i m e s f o r t h e d w e l l i n g s l i n e d w i t h i n c o m b u s t i b l e m a t e r i a l a r e 4 minutes f o r 1 0 p e r c e n t oxygen and 8 minutes f o r

1 p e r c e n t carbon monoxide.

':,%en t h e door of t h e bedroom i s c l o s e d witho-cl-t s p e c i a l p r e c a u t i o n s t o b l o c k a i r p a s s a g e s around t h e d o o r , a s was t h e c a s e i n t h e s e t e s t s , t h e p r o t e c t i o n a f f o r d e d a g a i n s t t h e d e l e - t e r i o u s e f f e c t of a f i r e a f f e c t i n g o t h e r s e c t i o n s of a house i s c l e a r l y demonstrated by c u r v e s B of b o t h F i g s . 1 7 and 18, p a r - - t i . c u l a r l y of t h e l a t t e r , ~ v h i c h concerns d w e l l i n g s l i n e d w i t h i n c o m b u s t i b l e m a t e r i a l . I n t h i s c a s e , it t o o k n e a r l y 1 5 minutes f o r t h e carbon monoxide t o r e a c h t h e 1 p e r c e n t l e v e l and a s

much a s 20 minutes f o r t h e oxygen c o n c e n t r a t i o n t o drop b e l o x 1 0 p e r c e n t . Corresponding t i m e s f o r t h e d w e l l i n g s l i n e d w i t h c o r ~ b u s t i b l e m a t e r i a l were

5

and 1 3 minutes r e s p e c t i v e l y .

(9)

I t was i n t h e c e l l a r , however, t h a t e q u i v a l e n t chances i n atmosuheric composition toolr t h e l o n g e s t t o be reached. I n t h e combu.stible-lined h o u s e s , a

I

p e r c e n t carbon monox:ide

c o n c e n t r a t i o n was o b t a i n e d o n l y a f - t e r a p e r i o d of 11 m i n u t e s , and t h e oxygen l e v e l was s t i l l above 1 0 p e r c e n t 20 minutes a f t e r i g n i t i o n . I n t h e o t h e r c a t e s o r y of d.wellinl;s, even a f t e r combustion had p r o g r e s s e d f o r

32

minutes t h e atmosphere o f t h e basetnent c o n t a i n e d 0.75 p e r c e n t carbon monoxide and. 1 8 p e r c e n t oxygen.

SURVIVAL

TIMES

-

--

The e x a c t l e v e l s a t which l a c k of oxygen o r I-ow concen- t r a t i o i l s of carbon monoxide w i l l r a p i d l y cause unconsciousness a r e s t i l l n o t a rnatter of d e f i n i t e a c c o r d , s i n c e t h e y a r e con- s i d e r a b l y a l t e r e d by such v a r i a b l e s a s e x e r t i o n , deptli of 1-es- p i r a t i o n , e x c i t e m e n t , f e a r , and o t h e r f a c t o r s a f f e c t i n g b o d i l y v i e o u r .

The ITational. F i r e P r o t e c t i o n A s s o c i a t i o n Commit t e e on F i r e Gas Research has r e p o r t e d

( 4 ) ,

however, t h a t c o l l a p s e oc- c u r s q u i c k l y when t h e oxygen c o n c e n t r a t i o n drops below 1 0 p e r c e n t . For t h e purpose of t h i s s t u d y , t h i s v a l u e was a c c e p t e d a s t h e limit under vrhich a person would become unable t o escape on h i s own e f f o r t . S u r v i v a l t i m e s e s t i m a t e d on t h i s b a s i s a r e g i v e n i n Table I .

On t h e oti-ler. hand, when carbon monoxide i s p r e s e n t , it i s almost g e n e r a l l y agreed

( 4 )

t h a t d e a t h w i l l o c c u r when 60 t o

80 n e r c e n t o f the blooc! hacn~o~.lobi-n h a s been tranzforrjed i n t o car'ooxy-haemor;lobin. The t i m e n e c e s s a r y f o r t h i s c o n d i t i o n t o be reached w i l l depend upon t h e r e l a t i v e a m o i ~ n t s , o r mass

a c t i o n s , of carbon monoxide and oxysen i n t h e a i r b r e a t h e d , and upon t h e i n t e n s i t y of t h e a f f i n i t i e s of t h e two g a s e s f o r hae- moylobin. I n g e n e r a l , t o determine t i m e of s u r v i v a l i n atmos- p h e r e s c o n t a i n i n g carbon monoxide, one r e s o r t s t o a formula derived from a c t u a l d a t a by Henderson and Haygard ( 5 ) by which f a t a l exposure t o carbon monoxide can be p r e d i c t e d .

where "t" i s t h e time of exposure i n minutes and "E-~" t h e carbon monoxide c o n c e n t r a t i o n i n p e r c e n t . Gonsciousness wox~ld, however, be l o s t a t a much lo7rer l e v e l of s a t u r a t i o n of t h e b l o o d , between 40 t o 50 p e r c e n t a c c o r d i n g t o G1aud.y ( 6 ) . On t h i s b a s i s , t i m e of s i ~ r v i v a l , i f t a k e n t o mean t h e time a t which a person beconles h e l - p l e s s

,

tvould be c o n s i d e r a b l y s m a l l e r t h a n tirne of f a t a l exposure

(10)

T!inchin ( ' 7 ) r e p o r t s t h a t c o l l a p s e would o c c u r when -t-11e p r o d u c t of t h e c a r b o n monoxitle conceu1;ration by t i m e OJ? exposure ( i n

m i n u t e s ) e q u a l s

4.5,

t ' r ~ a t i s

t x R,, , . =

4 . 5

The u s e o f t h i s formula i s , however, o n l y v a l i d when t h e carbon rnonoxide c o n c e n - b a t i o n i s c o n s t a n t . I n -the c o u r s e 01 a f i r e , t h e p r o p o r t i o n . of carbon rnonoxide in. t h e a t r n o s p l ~ e r e var.j.es constant-1-y, and i n o r d e r t o t a k e i n t o a c c o u n t i t s c u m u l a t i v e a b s o r p t i o n in. t h e bl.00~1 i t s con.cen-l;ration n e e d s t o be i n t e g a t e c ? . 1wi't;h r e s p e c t t o t i m e , t h a t i s

The a r e a s u n d e r t h e c u r v e s g i v e n i n F i g s . 11 t o 18 have t h e r e - f o r e been i n t e g r a t e d , and the? times a t which an a r e a eqt.livalent t o

4.5

was ob-tain.ed a r e l i s t e d i n Table I . I n many c a s e s , t h e s e t i m e s exceed t h e p e r i o d d u r i n g wh.ich measi.rremen-ts were o b t a i n e d f o r t h e test::. I n t h e s e ' i n s t a n c e s , constan-t v a l i - ~ e s e q u a l t o

t h e l a s t readin:; o b t a i n e d a r e assumed f o r t h e p e r i o d durinz; which no i n f o r m a t i o n was a v a i l a b l e .

These t i m e s may be compared. w i t h t i m e s , a l s o 1 - i s t e d i n Table I , a t which a 1 . 2 8 p e r c e n t c a r b o n monoxide c o n c e n t r a t i o n was o b t a i n e d . -4ccord.in~; t o Kam:ilton and J o h n s t o n e (€3)

,

a t t b . i s

c o n c e n t r a t i o n t h e r e i s a n immediate e f f e c t and c o i i s c i o u s n e s s i s l o s t .

I t shoilld be emphasized, however, t h a t t h e s u r v i v a l t i m e s g i v e n i n Table I a r e based on r e s u l t s o f s e p a r a t e s t n c l i e s : one concerned w i - t l ~ . t11e s o l e e f f e c t s o f l a c k o f o x y p n on human b e i n g s ,

and tile o t h e r w i t 1 1 -those of: c a r b o n monoxide i n a n o t h e r w i s e normal at-rnosphere. I n a b u r n i n g b u i l d i n g , where there i s a simultaneous

d e c r e a s e

or

oxygen and i n c r e a s e of c a r b o n monoxide, c a r b o n monoxide a b s o r p t i o n i n t h e blood w i l l be a c c e l e r a l i e d becau.se of t h e l o w e r oxyg.en p r e s s u r e i n t h e 1 . u . n ~ : ~ . Consequent1.y

,

s h o r t e r s u r v i v a l t i m e s than a n y o f t h o s e l i s t e d i n T a b l e I s h o u l d be expectecl..

(11)

1. S h o r t e r , G.':'i. :it. Lawrel~ce

Burns

-

General. R e p o r t . N . H . C . , DT3R I n t e r r ~ a l R e p o r t Fo. 1 5 0 , Nov. 1959. 2. ' t J i l l i a m s - L e i r , G. St-. T~swsence B u r n s

-

Temperature

P'iea s u r e m e n t s

.

IT.

R . C

.

,

DBR I n t e r n a l R e p o r t No. 1 5 2 , Dec. 1959.

j. i i r i l l i a m s - L e i r , G. S t . J~awrence B u r n s

-

Smoke and Sound Measurements. N. R . C .

,

DDR

I n t e r n a l R e p o r t No.

1-51, Uec. 1959.

4 . F i r e Gas R e s e a r c h R e p o r t . N a t i o n a l F i r e P r o t e c t i o n A s s o c i a i ; i o n , Commit-Lee on F i r e Gas R e s e a r c h . I?FP'11

Q u a r t e r l y , 4-5: 280. 1952.

5 . Henderson, Y. and H. 'X. Haggard. The P h y s i o l o g i c a l _ P r i n . c i p l e s Governing V e n t i l a t i o n \"hen t h e A i r i s

Contaminated w i t h Carbon J!!Ionoxide. J . I n d . k g .

Chern. 1 4 : 229-236. 1922.

6 . Claudy

,

Y.

D.

C a r b o ~ Monoxide i n F i r e - F l g h t i n s . NFPA

Firemen. V.21, n . 6 , 1 2 , 1 3 , a n d 22; n . 7 , 10-11. 1954.

7.

M i n c h i n ,

L.T.

Thild Carbon Monoxide P o i s o n i n g a s a n

I n d u s t r i - a 1 Hazard. Ind.. Chemist. 30: 381-385.

3 9 5 4

8. H a m i l t o n , A . a n d R. 5'. J o l m s t o n e . I n c i u s t Y i a l T o x i c o l o g y . Oxforcl I T n i v e r s i t y :Press. 191i.6.

(12)

1' k 0 k 0 U be 4) '" d U m 4 U

s

7 n I I O O O c o r - 3 I I m w n m a * m u 3 rl ao

d

2

II n m

.

0 . 0 C D r l t C r l d

m

<

a

A

m

$ 2 " .

n o m

.

tC

s d

w h u 3

.

m

m

A w A

-

*d d d m n "\ a w n

a

m

A !

Z d

w Q d Q )

; A t - C U

rl I f . I n

" \ m

z

0 -

9

4 ) t C w n

m

o

o0 m. 0. t c t c

> G

w

m n

0 , O'W d A

A

Y n

q

.

c o C U d A w sc J n

m

m

.

C U w w

a

$

2

+I d I a ri P a k*d w 0 - d k m = d

s a

d P r l a E d 0 0 1 2 O D n m r l

.

rl A w n I t C t C t C O d m C V W C V w

m

o

o

m

. .

o

.

d m w

m ' L ? ' L ? a o m o

0 . 0 A r i d B

2

:

w n ' " 0 c u o m 6

2

14

3'

d a ri 0 d z 5 m E: Q) + aw

:::

U

;GI;\

...

4. I -4 CU d- 0 0 . O C U Q ) ' " A d m o m A ri c 3

< " \ *

c u m w

.

a a 6 d d d P

2 2 4

* * *

m 3 m z 1 P P P 0 0 0 CV m

m

8 O c u t - N 'ci\

.

; i d ' "

' 0 . C ; ' o . C U

c u m r -a Q ) a d r i d

5 5 5

* * *

; ; 2

P P P

a

E! g o o

2 2 2

d d + I d d- Cc

A

n

w

n

.

o t c o A -8 n w 'd

2

*-I d I 6 d

2

s m k m tO 0 5 G k P d E a G o d 0s 0-ri a G 5 = + a

(13)

DINING ROOM

fl

9 y n x 1 0 , ' - 4 "

7L!ril[

- GROUND FLOOR

1

FIRST FLOOR - I 1 NOTES .,

I. ALL WALLS 6 CEILINGS OF PLASTER

!L

A

a

CLOSED BEDROOM 10'-2"x 8 ' - 3

'

[

1

INSTRUMENTATION

n

17 OPEN BEDROOM a ' . 0 " ~ / / ' - 5 " IN BASEMENT WEST CORNER LEGEND ,' 4 THERMOCOUPLES

9i

4

D L ~ N ~ lo €,-

RES/S TANCE THERMOMETER

0

RADIOMETERS \ @ THERMOPILE RADIOMETER .'\ GAS COLLECTORS SMOKE METERS

Tbh

0 BEDROOM BEDROOM 10'-2"x 10'- 6 " 8 ' - o ' ; l 0 ' . 6 " A N E M O M E T E R 0 5 10 t 1 m z -1 F E E T

(14)

GROUND FLOOR BATHROOM BEDROOM 10'- 8°K 1 0 ' - 5 " / 0 CLOSED BEDROOM T / 2 ' . 0 ' ( ~ 8 ' - 3 " OPEN BEDROOM 10'- 6 ' ; 8'. 1'' 10 I I I I t NOTES.

I ALL WALLS 8 CEILINGS OF FIBREBOARD EXCEPT

- IN BEDROOMS, WALLS 8 CEIL JNGS OF PLASTER - IN KI W H E N , WAINSCO r OF WOOD 2. INSTRUMENTA TlON IN BASEMENT WEST CORNER LEGEND - 0 THERMOCOUPL ES RESISTANCE THERMOMETER (3 RADIOMETERS

@ THERMOPILE RAOIOME TER

n GAS COLLECTORS

L

\ SMOKE METERS

(15)

/

- COVERED WITH PL ASTERBOARD

J

t I

KITCHEN 6 DINING ROOM 18'-2"x 9'- 10" L IVING ROOM 9'- 11"x 18'-2" CRIB UP - -

f

t

k+ GROUND FLOOR NOTES :

I . ALL WALLS 6 CEILINGS OF FIBREBOA RD FIRST FLOOR 2. INSTRUMENTATION IN BASEMENT WEST CORNER LEGEND : 4 THERMOCOUPLES % RESISTANCE THERMOMETER

0

RADIOMETERS @ THERMOPILE RADIOMETER GAS COLLECTORS SMOKE METERS 0

t-xAZ-2

F E E T

(16)

-, COVERED WITH PLASTERBOARD ? KITCHEN ~ 4 ' . 6 " ~ 8'-8" ~~ - I I L . q 7 ' - 0 2 L.. ...- 40?ol'__- DINING ROOM LOWER

---

14'-1O'x 15'- 5 " SASH REMOVED

I I

LIVING ROOM 1 1 ' - p ' j 1 4 ' - 9 " GROUND FL OUR

gdt*1

1

NOTES :

I ALL WALLS 6 CEILINGS OF P L A S T E R 2 INSTRUMEN TATION /N BASEMENT SOUTH CORNER LEGEND : -4 THERMOCOUPLES RESfSTANCE T H E W M E TER @ THERMOPILE RADIOMETER 0 GAS COLLECTORS SMOKE METERS O U F E E T

FIGURE 4

-

BUILDING NO. 4

-

TWO - STOREY WOOD FRAME DWELLING WITH CLAPBOARD EXTERIOR AND BRICK INFILLING

(17)

NOTES :

I. ALL WALLS B CEILINGS OF PRESSED PAPERBOARD 2. INSTRUMEN TATION IN BASEMENT LEGEND : -4 THEIIMOCOUPL ES

-% RESISTANCE TtfERMOME TER C ) RADIOME mas @ THERMOPILE RADIOMETER 0 GAS COLLECTORS SMOKC METERS 0 5 10 I r

--

FEET FIRST FLOOR

FIGURE 5 -BUILDING NO. 5 - TWO

-

STOREY WOOD FRAME DWELLING WITH CLAPBOARD EXTERIOR

(18)

GROUND FLOOR 0 I - - - - 5 I0 FEET NOTE .' CElL /NG WALLS WAINSCOT PLASTER WOOD

-

THERMOCOUPLES

A RES/S TA NCE THERMOMETERS ANEMOMETERS

0

RADIOMETERS

@ THERMOPILE RADIOMETER

F I G U R E 6

-

BUILDING No. 6

-

T W O

-

S T O R E Y SOLID B R I C K

(19)
(20)

GROUND FLOOR N '- 6 " x 11'- 6 " OPEN BEDROOM 1 1 ' - 6 " x 11'-6" CLOSED BEDROOM I/'-6" r 10'-0' 3 2 ' - 2 " FIRS T FLOOR NOTES:

I ALL WALLS a CEILINGS

OF PLASTER

IN BASEMENT SOUTH CORNER

LEGEND :

-

THERMOCOUPLES

% RESIST4 NCE THERMOMETER

0

RADIOMETERS @ THERMOPILE RADIOMETER GAS COLLECTORS SMOKE METERS 0

-

5 I 0 F E E T

(21)

NO WIND NOTE : WALLS O f PLASTER CEILING OF WOOD LEGEND : --a THERM3COUPL ES % RESISTANCE THERMOMETERS ANEMOMETERS

0

RADIOMETERS THERMOPlL E RADIOMETER GROUND FLOOR 0

-

5 10 FEET

F I G U R E

8

-

6,UILDING

NO. 8

-

T W O

-

S T O R E Y SOLID

BRICK

(22)
(23)

Y ~ C U P l P E

/;;;;;

TO

Y;

19;

TO

vi

CU P l P E

LOCK SCREWS REDUCING COUPLING

FOR CENTERING AND DEPTH ADJUSTMENT

3 REQD

CONTA

l

NER

I" GLASS WOOL

SLEEVE

RING

(24)
(25)

BU lLDl NG No. l (NONCOMBUSTIBLE LINING) 0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 T I M E IN MINU'TES

1

I

I

I

I

I

I

I 1 I I I 1 I CARBON MONOXI DE

-

I I I

-

I I I I -1 t

-

I I I 0 0 4 8 12 16 2 0 24 28 32 T I M E IN M I N U T E S I I

I

I

I

I

I

I

-

OXYGEN

-

-

\ t \ \ - \ I.

-

s \

-

-

1

1

1

F I G U R E

11

CARBON MONOXIDE AND OXYGEN CONCENTRATIONS I N ( A ) OPEN BEDROOM AND ( B ) CLOSED BEDROOM OF B U I L D I N G NO.1 DURING BURN. GRASS F I R E CUT OFF GAS S A M P L I N G L I N E TO C E L L A R E A R L Y I N T E S T .

(26)

B U I L D I N G N o . 2 ( C O M B U S T I B L E L I N I N G )

-

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I I

. . . .

. . . .

.

.

...

-

I I -1 I I I C A R B O N M O N O X I D E I I 0 4 8 12 I 6 2 0 2 4 2 8 . 3 2 I T l M E I N MINUTES O X Y G E N 0 0 4 8 12 16 2 0 2 4 2 8 3 2 T I M E I N M I N U T E S F I G U R E

12

CARBON M O N O X I D E AND OXYGEN CONCENTRATIONS IN ( A ) OPEN BEDROOM ( B ) CLOSED BEDROOM . A N D ( C ) CELLAR OF BUILDING N 0 . 2 DURING BURN

(27)

B U I L D I N G N o . 3 ( C O M B U S T I B L E L I N I N G )

I

I

I

1

2

-

C A R B O N M O N O X I D E

-

-

1

I

0 4 8 12 16 2 0 2 4 2 8 3 2 'TIME IN MINUTES 0 0

4

8 12 16 2 0 2 4 2 8 3 2 T I M E I N M I N U T E S F I G U R E

13

I

I

I

-

. . O m . . . . OXYGEN

-

-

-

I

-

-

-

CARBON M O N O X I D E AND O X Y G E N C O N C E N T R A T I O N S I N ( A ) OPEN BEDROOM ( 0 ) CLOSED BEDROOM AND ( C ) C E L L A R OF B U I L D I N G NO. 3 D U R I N G BURN

0 R 2 0 2 9 - 3

(28)

B U I L D I N G No. 4 ( N O N C O M B U S T I B L E L I N I N G ) C A R B O N MONOXI DE

-

-

0 4 8 12 16 2 0 24 2 8 3 2 T l M E I N MINUTES 0 0 4 8 12 16 2 0 24 2 8 3 2 T l M E IN MINUTES

I

I

-

OXYGEN

-

-

0 \ \

-

\

-

\

-

-

FIGURE

14

I

I

CARBON MONOXIDE AND OXYGEN CONCENTRATIONS I N ( A ) OPEN

I

I

I

I

BEDROOM AND ( 6 ) CLOSED BEDROOM OF B U I L D I N G NO. 4 DURING BURN. NO DETERMINATIONS WHERE MADE I N THE PARTLY

EXCAVATED C E L L A R

(29)

BUILDING No.

5

(COMBUSTIBLE LINING) CARBON MONOXIDE 0 4 8 12 I 6 20 24 28 32 T l M E I N M I N U T E S OXYGEN 0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 T l M E I N M I N U T E S

CARBON M O N O X I D E A N D OXYGEN C O N C E N T R A T I O N S I N ( A ) OPEN BEDROOM ( 8 ) CLOSED BEDROOM AND ( C ) C E L L A R OF B U I L D I N G N 0 . 5 D U R I N G BURN.

(30)

B U I L D I N G No.

7

( N O N C O M B U S T I B L E L I N I N G )

I

I

I

-

-4 C A R B O N M O N O X I D E

.-'

-

-

...

-

a * *

....

...

y;;.*.*''

-

7

I

4 8 12 16 2 0 2 4 2 8 3 2 T l M E I N M I N U T E S i

I

I

I

...

...

a*..

-

*. -0..

@--i'.*..

-

O X Y G E N

-

\ \

-

\

-

-

-

I.

I

I

I

I

I

-

T I M E I N M I N U T E S F I G U R E I6 C A R B O N M O N O X I D E AND O X Y G E N C O N C E N T R A T I O N S IN ( A ) OPEN

BEDROOM ( B ) CLOSED BEDROOM AND ( C ) C E L L A R OF B U I L D I N G N 0 . 7 D U R I N G B U R N .

(31)

BUILDINGS WlTH C O M B U S T I B L E L I N I N G

I

I

1

I

I

I

I

.

.

I:...' I - I

-

-

C A R B O N M O N O X I D E

MEAN OF THREE READINGS

-

---

MEAN OF TWO READINGS

...

ONLY ONE READING

0 4 8 12 16 2 0 2 4 28 32 T l M E I N MINUTES 0 0 4 8 I 2 16 2 0 24 28 32 T I M E I N M I N U T E S r

I

I

-

-

-

O X Y G E N

-

MEAN OF THREE READINGS-

----

MEAN OF TWO READINGS

...

b . . ONLY ONE READING

-

F I G U R E

17

M E A N C O N C E N T P A T I O N S OF CARBON MONOXIDE AND O'XYGEN IN ( A ) OPEN BEDROOM ( B ) CLOSED BEDROOM AND ( C ) C E L L A R OF

B L I I L D I N G S L I N E D W l T H C O M B U S T I B L E M A a r E R I , A L

(32)

BUILDINGS W l T H NONCOMBUSTIBLE L I N I N G 1.6

I

I :

I

I

I

I

I

:: C A R B O N M O N O X I D E

.-

.:

MEAN OF THREE READINGS

-

/;

.

- --

t - MEAN OF TWO READINGS

....

;

i

;,:'

: a.

...

ONLY ONE READING

,---/

0.

.

..

: / 5'

....

/ I

....

...

**.

...

...

0 4 8 12 16 2 0 2 4 28 3 2 T I M E I N MINUTES 0 0 4 8 12 I 6 2 0 2 4 28 3 2 T I M E I N M I N U T E S

I

I

I

I

I

...

... ...*...

-

. .

**.

*.

O X Y G E N **. *.

-

MEAN OF THREE READINGS

----0 MEAN OF TWO READINGS

',.'\,

\

""""" ONLY ONE READING

-

'

.

.

\

'.

-

-

-

I

I

I

f

I

I

I

1

F I G U R E

I8

M E A N C O N C E N T R A T I O N S OF CARBON MONOXIDE AND OXYGEN I N ( A )

OPEN BEDROOM ( 8 ) CLOSED BEDROOM AND ( C ) C E L L A R OF B U I L D I N G S L I N E D W l T H I N C O M B U S T I B L E M A T E R I A L

(33)

APPENDIX A

Readings o b t a i n e d on oxygen and oarbon monoxide c o n c e n t r a t i o n s i n the c l o s e d bedroom, open bedroom, and c e l l a r of e a c h o f t h e s i x d w e l l i n g s during the

"st.

Lawrenoe ~ u r n s " .

(34)

ST- LAWRENCE BURNS GAS ANALYSIS

B u i l d i n g No. 1

9

January

1958

Time Closed Bedroon: Open Bedroom C e l l a r MinSec $ C O $ 0 2 0 00 0 .OO 20.9 0.00 20.9 0 30 0.00 20.9 0.00 1 00

o

-00 1 30

o

,OO 20.9

f

0.00 20.8 0-02 2 00 0.00 2 30 0.01 0.03 0.13 20.3

19-7

16

-5

5

00

5

30

17.3

6

00

6

30 8 30

9

00

9

30 10 00 10 30 11 00 11 30 12 00

0-65

13-7

d o +,

.

12 30

0.66

o OBP 0.70

13.1

l e 5 d C l n @k

.

0-76

12.7

,

5 a 0.80 12.5

a z g

111

30 0

-79

4 0 a>- P NOTE

-

h o r n

5;

=

l h a surement 8

sgg

d i s c o n t i n u e d . Sampling l i n e

;

c u t o f f by B firo. o zi

6

05

NOTE

-

No r e a d i n g s obtained. Sampling l i n e c u t o f f by g r a s s f i r e .

O.l5+

I

15.5

, 10.1

7.1

(35)
(36)

ST* LAWRENCE BURNS GAS ANALYSIS

-

Building No,

3

January 1958

Time Min See

o

00 0 30 1 00 1 30 2 00 2 30

3

00

2

2:

4

30

5

00

2

2:

6

30

7

00 7 30 8 00 8 30

9

00

9

30 10 00 10 30 11 00 11 30 12 00 1 2 30

13

00

3

20"

14

30

15

00

15

30

16

00

16

30

17 00

17

30

18

00 18 30 Closed

%

CO 0.00 0.00 0 eOO 0.00 0 mO0 0.02

o

*02 0.03 0.11 0

.25

0.48 0.70 0.95 1.21 1.50

I

l a e o

?6

:;

16

16.2 16.0

16.1

16.3

16.

16*<

16.3

16.3

Bedroom

%

O2 20.9 20.9 20.9 20.5

19.5

18.3 17.2

16.1

114.9

13.6 13.0 13 e l

13.1

12.9 12.8 5.8

6

.o

Opon

$ c o

0.00 0

.oo

0.00

o .oo

0.00

o

.

15

0

a147

1.30 Bedroom $ 0 , 20.9 20.8 17.8

7

*6

%

CO 0

.Icz

0

a45

::$8

0. 2

o

.66

0.72 0.81 0.90 0.98

1.04

1.

d+

1.24

::p

1. 47 C e l l a r

%

02 d 19.8

19.5

19

*3

19.

1 18.7

18.4

18.2

17

*9

17

*4

17

02

(37)

Building N O O

4

S T l LAInmENCE BURNS GAS ANALYSIS

15

January

1958

Time Min Soc

.o

00 0 30 1 00 1 30 2 00 2 30

3

00

2

2:

4

30

5

30

6

00

6

30

7

00

7 3 0

8

00 8 30

9

00

9

30 10 00 10 30 11 00 11 30 1 2 00 12

30

15

00

15

30

16

00

16

30 17 00

17

30

18

00 18 30

19

00

19

30 20 00 20 30 2 1 00 21 30 Closed Bedroom I

%

CO

%

o2

C e l l a r

$

co

$

O2 Opon

%

CO No determinations made Bedroom

%

0, 20.9 20.8 20.4

14.5

1002

9.1

900 9.0 902 10

03

10.8 11

08

9.6

6.6

0.00 O o O O O oOO 0 ,OO 0.00 O o O O 0.01 0017 0.55 0.91 1.11 1020 1.22 1.24 102 0 l o

15

1.10 1.08 1010 1.07 1-02

0.98

0 0 9 5 0.8 O e 8 2 1.23

0094

1.9

oooo

0.00 O o O O O o O O 0 000 0 .OO 0 000 0.00 0001 0.02 0.05 0.07 0.10

0.13

0.15 0.16 0.18 0.20 0.21 0 ,22 0.25 0.28

0.31

0. 0.50 0.60

o

,68

0079

0.89 1.03 1.18 20.9 20.8 20.8 20.8 20

19.9

19

04

19.0 18.7

18.4

18 .O

17

04

16

.9

16

-2

15.5

14.8

14.4

13

.z

13

13.3

12 l2

2

l 1 2 02 11. l1

02

11 02 lo 10

02

l 10.4 1001

(38)

ST. LAVfRENCE BURNS

----

GAS ANALYSIS

--

B u i l d i n g No.

5

16

January 1958 Time Min Sec

o

00 0 30 1 00 1 30 2 (10 2 30

3

00

i

;:

4

30

5

00

2

2:

6

30

7

00 7 30 Closed

%

G O 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 ,OO 0.00 I 0.00 O e 0 1 0.03

0 ~ 1 5

0.20

o

.65

0.97

~ 5 . o

Open

s&

CO

o,oo

0.00 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.41

1.50

- Bedroom

%

o2

---

20.9 20.9 20.9 20.9

1 . 5

17 *7

16.7

15.1

13

*5

8

00

1

8 30

9

00

9

30 10 00 10 30 11 00 11 30 12 00 12 30

13

00 ,

g

20"

4

30

15

00

15

30

16

00

16

30

17

00

17

30 10 00

18

30

19

00 Bedroom -7

-%

0, 20.9 20.9 20.5 1 2

e 3

2.7

%

CO 0,

"'b

0.

5

0.81 0.70 0 e70 0.75 0.79 0.83 0.87 0.93

o

.q8 0*97 0

*97

0.98

Oe99

0.99 1.00 1.02 1*12 1 2

.3

12.3 . C e l l a r

%

O2

-

20.4 20.3

19.9

19

07

19.5

:!:%

1

.8

18.4

17.9

17 07

17.6

17.3

17

*2 1 l a

*9

16

,5

Z:?

12

e9

1.32

1.5-1-

11.3

9.7

(39)

ST, LAWRENCE BURNS

GAS ANALYSIS

Figure

FIGURE  I  -  BUILDING  No.  I  -  TWO  -  STOREY  SOLID  BRICK  DWELLING
FIGURE  2  -  BUILDING  NO.  2  -  TWO -  STOREY  SOLID  BRICK  DWELLING
FIGURE  3  -  BUILDING  NO.  3  -  T W O   -  S T O R E Y   SOLID  BRICK  DWELLING
FIGURE  4  -  BUILDING  NO.  4  -  TWO  -  STOREY  WOOD  FRAME  DWELLING  WITH  CLAPBOARD  EXTERIOR  AND  BRICK  INFILLING
+4

Références

Documents relatifs

i) The calculated intensities are very close to those obtained by the software CaRIne, ii) There is a difference between the calculated intensities and those given by the base

c Department of Chemical Engineering , Saad Dahlab University of Blida , Blida , Algeria d Laboratory of Environmental Biotechnologies BIOGEP , Ecole Polytechnique d’Alger—10

Par contre si le scénario d’accords agricoles alternatifs a augmenté les prix aux producteurs et l’équité, il a aussi augmenté les dépenses publiques pour le financement

اًﻮْﻀُﻋ ﺔﻴﻧﺪﻤﻟا ﺔﻴﻟوﺆﺴﻤﻟا ﻦﻣ ﻦﻴﻣﺄﺘﻟا ﺠﻟا نﻮﻧﺎﻘﻟا ﻲﻓ روﺮﻤﻟا ثداﻮﺣ جﺎـــــــﺤﻟوأ ﺪـــــــﻨﺤﻣ ﻲـــــــــﻠﻛأ

The nominal result and statistical uncertainty is given in black, while the results of the dominant systematic variations to the nominal model (per Sec. VI ) are given by the

راد ،(ةنراقم ةسارد) كلهتسملا ةيامح دعاوق ءوض يف ةحايسلا دوقع يف ةمالسلا نامضب مازتلالا ،حاتفلا دبع ديلف دباع رهاقلا ،ةيبرعلا ةضهنلا ،ة 2006 ص ، 26..

detection of flooded areas on the 526 MODIS images, chosen to monitor the annual and interannual variations of the flood. The IDL routine automatically computed

the criteria towards design and accepting the latter two as constraints, a proposal for the total form of the campus for 1980 is suggested. The existing