• Aucun résultat trouvé

Study on Dynamic Source Routing Protocols for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Study on Dynamic Source Routing Protocols for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks"

Copied!
3
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HAL Id: inria-00466140

https://hal.inria.fr/inria-00466140

Submitted on 22 Mar 2010

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

Study on Dynamic Source Routing Protocols for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks

Jie Li, Hisao Kameda, Yi Pan

To cite this version:

Jie Li, Hisao Kameda, Yi Pan. Study on Dynamic Source Routing Protocols for Mobile Ad Hoc

Networks. WiOpt’03: Modeling and Optimization in Mobile, Ad Hoc and Wireless Networks, Mar

2003, Sophia Antipolis, France. 2 p. �inria-00466140�

(2)

Mobile Ad Hoc Networks

Jie Li y

, HisaoKameda y

and Yi Pan z

y

Institute of Information Sciences and Electronics, University of Tsukuba

Tsukuba Science City, Ibaraki305-8573,Japan

z

Department of Computer Science, Georgia State University

University Plaza, Atlanta,GA 30303, USA

A mobileadhocnetwork(MANET)consistsofacollectionofwirelessmobilenodesthat arecapableof

communicatingwitheachother. Thereisnouseofastaticnetworkinfrastructuresuchasbasestationorany

centralizedadministrationinMANET.Duetothelimitedtransmissionrangeofwirelessnetworkinterfaces,

multiplehops(intermediatehosts)maybeneededforonehosttotransferdatatoanotheracrossthenetwork.

InMANET, each mobilehostmay operatenotonlyasaterminalbut also asarouter, forwardingpackets

from other mobile hosts. The mobile hosts are freeto movearound, thus changing thenetwork topology

dynamically. ThusroutingprotocolsforMANETshouldbeadaptiveandabletomaintainroutesinspiteof

changingthenetworkconnectivity. Suchnetworksareveryusefulinmilitaryandothertacticalapplications

suchas emergencyrescue orexplorationmissions, where staticcellularphone infrastructureis unavailable

orunreliable. Commercial applicationsare alsolikelywhere there isaneed forubiquitouscommunication

serviceswithoutthepresentoruseofaxednetworkinfrastructure.

Designand analysisofroutingprotocolsarethekeyissuesin MANET.TheprimarygoalofaMANET

routingprotocolistoestablishacorrectandeÆcientroutebetweenapairoftwohostsfordeliveringmessage

inatimelymanner. Manydierentroutingprotocols[2,3]havebeenproposedforMANETs. Theycanbe

classiedintotwocategories: table-drivenandon-demand.

Thetable-drivenroutingprotocolsaresimilartoandcomeasanaturalextensionofthoseforthewired

networksincludingInternet. Theyessentiallyuseproactiveschemes,whichattempt tomaintainconsistent

up-to-dateroutinginformationfromeachhosttoeveryothernodeintheMANET.Theseprotocolsrequire

eachhostto maintainoneormoretables tocontainlatestroutinginformation,andanychangein network

topology needs to be reected by broadcasting updates information throughout the network in order to

maintainaconsistentnetwork view.

Ontheother hand,the on-demandroutingprotocolstakealazy approachto routing. Themotivation

behindtheon-demandprotocolsistoreduce largeamountof overheadformaintainingtheroutingtablein

thetable-drivenprotocolsinthedynamicMANET.Theyaresource-initiatedschemeswhichdonotmaintain

orconstantlyupdate theirroute tableswith thelatest routetopology. This type ofroutingcreates routes

onlywhen desired by thesource node. Whenanode requires aroute toadestination, itinitiates aroute

discoveryprocesswithin thenetwork. This process is completed onceone ormoreroutes arefound orall

possibleroutepermutationshavebeenexamined. However,routingoverheadforon-demand protocolsmay

bestilllargemainlybecausetheoodingprocessusedindiscoveringroutes,wherethesource(i.e.,thehost

seekingaroute)oods theentirenetworkwithaquerypacketinsearchingarouteto thedestination.

The Dynamic Source Routing (DSR) protocol (e.g., [1, 4]) is one of the more generally accepted on-

demand routingprotocols. It is naturalto considerthe DSRprotocolwith multple routes sincetheymay

bebuiltduring theroutediscoverybyooding. TheDynamicSourceRouting(DSR) protocolproposedin

[1]alsohasanoptionofmaintainingmultipleroutes,sothat analternateroutecanbeuseduponfailureof

theprimaryone. Butin DSR[1],toomany routesaremaintainedin atrivialmanner, withoutanyregard

totheirultimateusefulness. Theperformancestudy ofDSRprotocolshasnotbeenconducted in[1].

The concept of multipath routing has been used for circuit switched and packet switched networks

as it provides an easy mechanism to distribute traÆc and balance the network load, as well as provide

faulttolerance. For MANET,theTemporallyOrderedRoutingAlgorithm(TORA) [5,6]providesmultiple

alternate pathsby maintaining a"destination-oriented" directed acyclicgraphfrom thesource. However,

(3)

DSRprotocol proposed in [4] , thesourcehostwillselect theshortestrouteto thedestination atrst and

willcacheallthealternaterouts. Iftherstroutebreaks,theshortestremainingalternaterouteisselected.

The process continues until all routes break, then a new route discoveryis initiated. In the second DSR

protocol,allintermediate nodesarenowequippedwith adisjoint,alternate route. Ifadata packet issent

into anintermediate hostand thelink connecting tothe nexthostis broken,the alternateroute from the

intermediatenodewillbeused forsendingthe allthelaterdata packets. Sincesomedatapacketsmaybe

lost dueto alinkbreak andthemessageaboutthe datalossmaynotbesentbackto thesourcehost,the

losingdatapackets maynotberesentandbelostpermanentlyin thesecondDSRprotocolin[4]. Because

of the possibility of lossingdata packets, we consider that the second DSR protocol cannot be used as a

practicalone.

WenotethataninterestinganalyticmodelisdevelopedforanalyzingtheperformanceofDSRprotocols.

Theperformanceusedintheanalysisisthetimeintervalbetweenroutediscoveriesforadatatransmissionin

anon-demandDSRprotocol. Thistimeintervalbetweenroutediscoveriesisalsothelifetimeofthemultiple

routesused forthedata transmission. Note that thelifetime foradatatransmissionchanges dynamically.

Ifthe lifetime foradata transmissionis shorterthanthe lifetime of multiple routes,it isnot necessaryto

havelonglifetimeofmultipleroutessincethedatatransmissionwillnishbeforethestartofthenextroute

discovery. On the other hand,the lifetime of a data transmissionmaybe longerenough which may need

morethantworoutediscoveries. Theperformancemetricusedin[4]doesnotreecttheperformanceofthe

DSRprotocolswell.

In this paper, we develop a comprehensive analytic model for the performance study of the multiple

route DSR protocol for MANET. At rst, weintroduce twoperformancemetrics. Therst metric is the

probabilitythatthe lifetimeof multiple routesislargerthanthelifetime ofadatatransmission. Itis easy

toseethatthelargertheprobabilityis,thebettertheperformanceofamultiplerouteDSRprotocolis. We

calltheprobabilityprobabilityofasuccessfuldatatransmission. Thesecondmetricistheprobabilitythatthe

multiple routes can be usedfor the next data transmission. Notethat in themultiple route DSRprotocol,

thelifetime ofmultipleroutesforasourceS todestinationDmaybelongerthanthetimeintervalbetween

twodata transmission. It meansthat someroutes used for adata transmission may also beavailable for

thenextdata transmission. Thesecond metricisused tostudy thepossibility ofusingmultiple routes for

thenextdatatransmission,whiletherstmetricshowstheprobabilityofusingmultipleroutesforonedata

transmission. Wederiveboththeprobabilityofasuccessfuldatatransmissionandtheprobabilitythatthe

multipleroutescanbeusedforthenextdatatransmissionforthegeneralcaseovernmultipleroutes. These

analytic resultsprovide insightsinto mechanics ofthe multiple DSRroutingprotocol. It isalso useful for

thedesignand implementationoftheon-demandroutingforMANET.

References

[1] J.Broch,D.JohnsonandD.Maltz,"DynamicSourceRoutinginWirelessAdHocNetworks,"inMobile

Computing,eds.T.ImielinskiandH.Korth(KluwerAcademic,1996)Chapter5.

[2] Yu-Liang Chang, Ching-Chi Hsu, "Connection-Oriented Routingin Ad HocNetworks Based on Dy-

namicGroupInfrastructure,"itProc.oftheFifthIEEESymposiumonComputersandCommunications

(ISCC2000),pp.587-593,July04-06,2000Antibes,France

[3] Ming-Hong Jiang, Rong-Hong Jan, "An EÆcient Multiple Paths Routing Protocol for Ad-hoc Net-

works,"The15thInternationalConferenceonInformationNetworking(ICOIN'01),January31-Febru-

ary02,2001BeppuCity,Oita,Japan,pp.544-549.

[4] A.Nasipuri,R.Castaneda andS.Das, "Performanceofmultipath routingforon-demandprotocolsin

mobileadhodnetworks,"ACM/Kluwer Mobile Networksand Applications, vol.6,no.4, pp.339-349,

2001.

[5] VincentD. ParkandM.ScottCorson,"AHighlyAdaptiveDistributedRoutingAlgorithmforMobile

WirelessNetworks,"Proc. ofIEEE INFOCOM '97,Kobe,Japan,April1997,pp.1405-1413.

[6] VincentD.ParkandM.ScottCorson,"APerformanceComparisonoftheTemporally-OrderedRouting

AlgorithmandIdeal Link-StateRouting,"Proc. of IEEE Symposium onComputers and Communica-

Références

Documents relatifs

His research interests include applications of discrete Maths to Computer Science: complex- ity analysis of algorithms and data structures, analytic combinatorics,

Domaine de Voluceau, B.P. The advantage hereof is that no prior assumption of the network topology is required in order to provide routing between any pair of nodes in the network.

Unité de recherche INRIA Rennes : IRISA, Campus universitaire de Beaulieu - 35042 Rennes Cedex (France) Unité de recherche INRIA Rhône-Alpes : 655, avenue de l’Europe -

Unit´e de recherche INRIA Rennes, Irisa, Campus universitaire de Beaulieu, 35042 RENNES Cedex Unit´e de recherche INRIA Rh ˆone-Alpes, 655, avenue de l’Europe, 38330 MONTBONNOT

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des

Considering both figure 12 and figure 6, we observe that, when varying the number of traffic streams in the network, OLSR consistently has a shorter route length - even at a

Reverse Path Forwarding Flooding [4] (RPF) augments the mechanism of CF by the requirement that a node may only forward a packet if the “previous hop” of the packet is on the

1) Shortest-path RREQ forwarding: The first observation that can be from the shortest-path RREQ forwarding results is that the use of standard jitter, with the distribution specified