Publisher’s version / Version de l'éditeur:
Vous avez des questions? Nous pouvons vous aider. Pour communiquer directement avec un auteur, consultez la
première page de la revue dans laquelle son article a été publié afin de trouver ses coordonnées. Si vous n’arrivez pas à les repérer, communiquez avec nous à PublicationsArchive-ArchivesPublications@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca.
Questions? Contact the NRC Publications Archive team at
PublicationsArchive-ArchivesPublications@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca. If you wish to email the authors directly, please see the first page of the publication for their contact information.
https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/droits
L’accès à ce site Web et l’utilisation de son contenu sont assujettis aux conditions présentées dans le site LISEZ CES CONDITIONS ATTENTIVEMENT AVANT D’UTILISER CE SITE WEB.
APTI Workshop Conserving Building Envelopes in Cold Climates [Proceedings], pp. 1-53, 2008-10-13
READ THESE TERMS AND CONDITIONS CAREFULLY BEFORE USING THIS WEBSITE.
https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/copyright
NRC Publications Archive Record / Notice des Archives des publications du CNRC :
https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/view/object/?id=346ee78d-3142-4114-914f-2835193cf162 https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/voir/objet/?id=346ee78d-3142-4114-914f-2835193cf162
NRC Publications Archive
Archives des publications du CNRC
This publication could be one of several versions: author’s original, accepted manuscript or the publisher’s version. / La version de cette publication peut être l’une des suivantes : la version prépublication de l’auteur, la version acceptée du manuscrit ou la version de l’éditeur.
Access and use of this website and the material on it are subject to the Terms and Conditions set forth at
New construction techniques and modern concepts applied to existing historic building envelopes
http://irc.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca N e w c o n s t r u c t i o n t e c h n i q u e s a n d m o d e r n c o n c e p t s a p p l i e d t o e x i s t i n g h i s t o r i c b u i l d i n g e n v e l o p e s O R A L - 9 1 1 R o u s s e a u , M . Z .
A version of this document is published in / Une version de ce document se trouve dans:
APTI Workshop Conserving Building Envelopes in Cold Climates, Montreal, QC, Oct. 13-18, 2008, pp.1-53
The material in this document is covered by the provisions of the Copyright Act, by Canadian laws, policies, regulations and international agreements. Such provisions serve to identify the information source and, in specific instances, to prohibit reproduction of materials without written permission. For more information visit http://laws.justice.gc.ca/en/showtdm/cs/C-42
Les renseignements dans ce document sont protégés par la Loi sur le droit d'auteur, par les lois, les politiques et les règlements du Canada et des accords internationaux. Ces dispositions permettent d'identifier la source de l'information et, dans certains cas, d'interdire la copie de documents sans permission écrite. Pour obtenir de plus amples renseignements : http://lois.justice.gc.ca/fr/showtdm/cs/C-42
New Construction Techniques and Modern
Concepts Applied to Existing Historic
Building Envelopes
by
Madeleine Z. Rousseau
National Research Council Canada, Ottawa for
“Tell Them What You Are Going
to Tell Them…”
3 Blocks:
1. Air, moisture and heat flow – Control strategies 2. Rain penetration - Control strategies
Environmental loads affect the
performance of the building envelope
Degree of deterioration – severity of load effects and dose – response relations
Mechanisms of deterioration
Most common agent
of deterioration?
MOISTURE
Mechanical
-deformation,cracking, spalling
Thermal
-Freeze-thaw action, cracking & spalling
Biological
-wood rot, mould growth
Chemical
Moisture Sources
• Before and during construction & conservation
– Building materials during storage and transportation – Rain & snow accumulation during construction
– Construction processes (e.g. concrete)
• During service life
– Exterior sources: rain, snow, ice, atmospheric water vapour, soil
– Indoor sources: occupants and their activities, HVAC systems
Seasonal phenomena
Wintertime
condensation
Rain penetration and
Factors at Work for Condensation
Moisture
(vapour)
Travel Path
Drive
A Differential …Temperature
gradient
Climates (wind,
Climates (wind,
temperature)
temperature)
and HVAC
and HVAC
Climates;
Climates;
thermal properties
thermal properties
of materials &
of materials &
assemblies
assemblies
(Indoor, outdoor,
(Indoor, outdoor,
construction)
construction)
Vapour and air
Vapour and air
permeance
permeance
of materials &
of materials &
assemblies
assemblies
Factors at Work for Condensation
Moisture (Vapour)
Travel Path
“Through & between, materials
Drive
A Differential …Temperature Gradient
Vapour DiffusionAir
Movement
Air leakage versus vapour diffusion
Air leakage is the most significant water
vapour transport mechanism
into concealed spaces
of the building envelope
Air Leakage
The drive:
• Air pressure differentialThe resistance:
• Air permeance of materials • OpeningsP
out< P
inTypes of air flow
Air Barrier Requirements
•
It is a
SYSTEM
made of
SEVERAL
materials over
the building envelope
•
Materials of low air permeance
•
Rigid assembly, for small deformations
•
Structural strength, to sustain wind loads
•
Most challenging:
Continuity
at joints and
Air Permeance of ABS Materials
Low air permeance
Max 0.02 L/(s•m
2) at 75 Pa
– Aluminum foil, polyethylene sheet (negligible),
elastomeric membrane (negligible)
spun-bonded polyolefin (0.004)
– Gypsum board (0.009)
– Plywood (0.008), OSB (0.01)
Structural Requirements for the AB
System
Must sustain and transfer 100% of the
wind loads to the structure
– without damage to itself or to adjacent materials and, – without much increase in system air leakage
Limited deflection
EX: the airtight element of the air barrier system may be a flexible membrane
Quantitative Requirements for AB
System
…Air leakage must be controlled to a level where
the
occurrence
of condensation has
to be sufficiently rare,
quantities
sufficiently
small,
drying
sufficiently rapid to avoid material
deterioration
and growth of
mould
and
fungi
.
NBC Appendix A 9.25.3.1How m
uch for
how lo
ng?
How m
uch for
how lo
ng?
Evaluation Guide for Evaluation of Air
Barrier Systems for Exterior Walls of
Low-Rise Buildings, by NRC Canadian
Construction Materials Centre (CCMC)
**The least drying potential to the outside,
the more airtight the Air barrier should be
Continuity of the ABS
Clear design intent:
What wall materials are to act as the ABS, the airtight element, the rigidity, etc.
How to carry these properties all over the
building enclosure?
Provide thought-through detailing of all junctions.
Validate buildability
Convey the objective to the trades, with mock-up, and figure out the sequencing of trades.
Location of Air Barrier System
Could be almost anywhere …
More durable when the temperature gradient
across it is small
Depends on the vapour permeance of the main
materials
When ABS material has low vapour
permeance, maintain it above dew
point temperature of indoor air.
Need for thermal insulation on the
outside of ABS
CCMC-evaluated Air Barrier
Systems
AB
Systems
– Two insulation-based systems for placement on the exterior of the stud cavity
• Extruded polystyrene; spray-in-place polyurethane systems
Examined the material and system requirements
AB
Materials
– Several breather-type sheathing membranes Examined the air permeance, but no system issues (e.g. the effect of fasteners or structural capability)
Moisture Diffusion
The drive:
•
Vapour pressure differential
–
Moisture content
in air
The path of resistance:
–
Vapour permeance of
materials
–
(ng/Pa•s•m
2) for a given
Requirements for Vapour Barrier
(VB)
Material
of low vapour permeance
– Polyethylene sheet; glass and metals, foil-faced materials,
– Extruded polystyrene (25 mm) = 23-92 ng/(Pa•s•m2)
– OSB (11 mm) = 44 ng/(Pa•s•m2)
– Plywood (6.4 mm) = 23-74 ng/(Pa•s•m2)
Location: warm side of the assembly
Control of Thermal Gradients
EXT
EXT EXTEXT EXTEXT EXTEXT
+20
+20°°CC
--2020°°CC
INT
INT INTINT INTINT INTINT
A
A
B
B
C
C
D
D
+20 +20°°CC +20+20°°CC +20+20°°CC --2020°°CC --2020°°CC --2020°°CC“Tell them what you are going to tell
them…”
3 Blocks:
9 Air, moisture and heat flow – Control strategies 2. Rain penetration - Control strategies
Vancouver BC
Rain Penetration Problems Occur in Cold
climate and Not Just in Coastal Regions
Wetting/Drying Balance
Inappropriate balance between
wetting
and
drying
mechanisms
– Exposure - walls got wet
– Details let water in
– Sensitivity of assemblies – inability to drain or dry
Wetting
• The 6 D Approach
– D
eflect
– D
rain
– D
ry
– D
urable
– “
D
eal with air
pressure difference”
D E T A I L I N G Sequencing … Think 3D Think cross trading…WATER
WATER
FORCES
FORCES
HOLES
HOLES
Three Conditions Required for Water
Ingress
Over time, design strategies focused on the control of some of these conditions
Effect of Overhang on Wall Performance 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0 1-300 301-600 Over 600
Width of overhang above wall, mm
Per centa ge of walls with pr oblems
Single Element Protection
Mass walls (masonry)• Masonry is porous
• Thickness of masonry provides large storage capability and long path for water ingress
• Rain deflection on building facades was extensive (e.g. deep
overhangs
• As structural design evolved toward non-load-bearing facades, masonry walls were built thinner and that
prompted a change in design to control rain ingress ( i.e. cavity walls)
Face Seal Approach: Control the Holes
• Cladding assembly is the
ONLY line of defense against rain penetration (and air leakage)
• No provision for water
evacuation once it gets in
• High on-going maintenance;
reliance on exterior seals
Goal: PERFECTION
To eliminate all openings in the cladding system
Inner wall
Air & water tight cladding
Single Element Protection
Multiple –Elements of Protection
Cavity walls
• Started with masonry, where two layers of masonry were separated by a large air space, flashed and drained at bottom
• Brick veneer with a 1 in. air
space, moisture barrier, flashing and weepholes
• Siding installed on vertical furring strips over a moisture barrier, with flashing drained outside
• Includes a drainage space, a capillary break and a moisture barrier
• Includes some redundancy, and control some of the forces
Rain Screen Walls
WATER
WATER
FORCES
FORCES
HOLES
HOLES
Premises:¾All holes cannot be eliminated
¾Water may enter past the cladding ¾Need to manage all forces, and
Forces
Holes
Holes
Water
Water
• Gravity • Surface tension • Capillarity• Rain drop momentum
• Air Pressure Difference
Reduce Forces Acting on Cladding
•Cavity wall
•Rain screen; Drain screen
•equalized; modulated; Pressure-moderated;Pressurized rain screen
Interior
Gravity
Horizontal Joint
Exterior
Forces Acting on Cladding-
Gravity
Gravity
Int. Ext.
Forces Acting on Cladding-
Surface
Tension & Capillarity
Surface tension Interior Capillarity Exterior Control of cracks Control porosity ??? 10 mm
Rain drop momentum
Interior Exterior
Forces Forces Acting on Cladding
-Rain Drop Momentum
Vertical joint
Control of Forces-
Air Pressure Difference
Air Pressure Difference
Air pressure difference Po P i P o> Pi Interior Exterior o P o P = Pi Pi?
Pc P P o o=
=
PPcc“Tell them what you are going to tell
them…”
3 Blocks:
9 Air, moisture and heat flow – Control strategies 9 Rain penetration - Control strategies
• Different materials and construction techniques • Little/no insulation in place • No designated air barrier
• No designated vapour barrier • Different detailing
• No humidification
• Depressurization with several stacks and combustion systems • May have been subjected to poor
maintenance, poor alterations and “improvements”
• Little concern over energy
efficiency, thermal comfort and air quality
• Buildings last centuries
Applying these principles to “upgrade”
older masonry buildings
Old Buildings - Appreciating the differences:
Typical scenario: “the building will be converted to new use. Can we add some thermal insulation on the inside
Concerns over adding thermal insulation
inside
• Adding thermal insulation on the interior side will result in colder masonry in wintertime
• Colder masonry may be more susceptible to:
– interstitial condensation, mould and water damage, & frost jacking
– differential movement with other adjoining elements, and crack formation or displacement
– more freeze-thaw cycles on sunny facades, possibly resulting in spalling where masonry is water saturated
– Less drying potential (and increased time of wetness) which can affect moisture sensitive materials embedded in the
• If the only thing you were going to do is to add thermal insulation, yes all these risks could materialize…
A holistic approach needs to be adopted
Minimize external moisture loads transport:
¾Minimize rain and melting snow deposition on masonry ¾Preserve the integrity of the first line of protection against rain infiltration
Minimize internal moisture loads transport:
¾Control indoor relative humidity
¾Provide effective barriers to moisture flow into the assembly
¾Minimize pressurization of the B. E. ***Identify problem areas and treat those separately/differently
Minimize External Moisture Loads
Transport to Interior
¾ Assess the roof integrity at managing water, melting snow and ice (detailing, flashing, slopes, condition of eave troughs and downspouts, air leakage in roof spaces) ¾ Minimize rain and melting snow deposition
on masonry elements (drip edge projection, flashing over & under openings, slope for drainage)
¾ Preserve the integrity of the first line of
protection against rain infiltration (condition of mortar, need for repointing with
compatible mortar) without reducing its breathability
¾ Decode existing damage to target problem areas, and address the cause
¾ Control relative humidity indoors- Do you even know what it is likely to be, based on occupancy requirements? How will it be controlled?
¾ Minimize pressurization of the building envelope; this means less drive for exfiltration of humid air. Do you even know what it is likely to be? -interact with HVAC engineering for acceptable solutions
¾ Provide effective barriers to moisture flow into the assembly. Air barrier continuity at junctions and interfaces will likely be your challenge
¾ Opt for reversible interventions
¾ Identify problem areas, and address the cause
¾ Recognize unknown and manage the risks, e.g. add redundancies,
tighter quality control during construction, monitoring problematic areas during several years of service, modelling prediction??
Minimize Internal Moisture Loads
Transport to Exterior
Case Studies
Several design professionals have studied & published :
• Patenaude-Trempe: conducted field review and test
openings on 10 energy retrofitted masonry buildings in different fashions, and reported satisfactory performance.
– In 8 cases 25 to 37 mm SPF was sprayed onto the back of the masonry, acting as both air barrier and thermal
insulation. Typically vapour barrier was independent part of an uninsulated steel stud assembly
SPF sprayed directly on masonry is practically not reversible. One better practice is to first apply a sacrificial parging on the masonry before applying the SPF (J. Diodati case
Case Study
• NRC-IRC monitored a 4 storey warehouse built in 1911 and converted in 1993 to offices and workshops and laboratories
Energy Retrofit Approach
16 mm drywall 90 mm steel stud 30-35 mm air gap 55 mm foil-faced insulation Concrete floor Main support floor beam Steel column in brick wall Sand-lime brick Clay brick 765 305 235 100 16 mm drywallTemperature gradient in Jan 1994
765 mm -10.5 C 235 mm C la y b ri ck fa ci n g -31.1 C Exterior Steel column 305 mm 0 C 32.2 C Air space Dry wall In su latio n 5 5 m m S te e l s tu d 9 0 m m Interior 24.8 C 18.9 C 23.9 C 765 mm 265 mm 305 mm C la y b ri ck fa ci n g -29 C Exterior Steel column 0 C 32.9 C Interior 24.8 C 15.3 C Uninsulated InsulatedComparative Temperature Regime
-40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40Aug-93 Dec-93 Apr-94 Aug-94 Dec-94
Tem per a ture (°C ) UNINSULATED T6 INSULATED T41 Max Min Max Min INTERIOR SURFACE Interior face of masonry
No moisture problems were detected
in wintertime – A contributing factor
-50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 December 1994 P res s u re di ff er enc e (P a) Weekend
The building operated mainly in negative pressure (laboratories and workshops), leading to cold air infiltration, not exfiltration of indoor air)
The Dynamic Buffer Zone- the Mechanical
Weapon
• The goal: avoid
exfiltration of indoor humid air and keep masonry warm
• Strategy: create a double wall or use an existing cavity and blow warm dry air to pressurize that cavity above
outdoors and above indoors pressure
Indoor space at 50%RH
DBZ Masonry
Typical Applications
• Most warranted: buildings of high heritage significance where the indoor humidity level requirements are high, and the complexity of the building geometry/construction or the preservation of the interior finishes make the use of “passive” approach of installing interior insulation and air barrier impractical
• Examples: McCord Museum Montreal; Musée des beaux-arts Montreal; Musée du Québec Quebec city; Federal
heritage properties on Parliament Hill Ottawa; Nature Museum Ottawa
DBZ- variations on the theme
Reported to be less effective as negative pressure can prevail in the DBZ near the return air plenum
DBZ: Things to consider
• Need for an effective air barrier to form the interior layer of the BDZ cavity
• Evaluate impact on indoor air quality e.g. Not suitable when contaminants such as asbestos is present in exterior walls
• Need a monitoring & alarm system, and back up plan if air handling system breaks down
• Need training building manager • Evaluate energy consumption
In a nutshell
• In the conservation field , every case is unique
• Effective moisture control is a must for ensuring durability of the building. Air tightness more critical and challenging to achieve than vapour diffusion control.
• Effective intervention on the INTERIOR of the building envelope does require effective control of EXTERNAL moisture sources
• No one magic bullet solution for adding thermal insulation to interior of existing older masonry envelopes. Several documented case studies showed a holistic approach to air, heat and moisture flow control can work.
Thank You!
Madeleine Z. Rousseau
National Research Council Canada, Ottawa E-mail: madeleine.rousseau@nrc.ca
Water
Water
Forces
Forces
Holes
Holes
•• Regional & local climatesRegional & local climates •
• Geometry of building envelopeGeometry of building envelope •
• “Direct” water management“Direct” water management •
• Shielding (projections, Shielding (projections, soffitssoffits) ) •
• Properties of cladding Properties of cladding materials
materials
Reduce exposure to rain
• Protection during construction • Overhangs
• Eavestrough and downspout system to manage water from top to bottom
Holes
Holes
Forces
Forces
Water
Water
•• Unintentional holes Unintentional holes
(during design, construction
(during design, construction
and service life)
and service life)
•
• Intentional holes (vents)Intentional holes (vents) •
• Porosity of the claddingPorosity of the cladding
Re duc e H ole s (unobst ruc t e d
Choosing the Destiny of the Walls
Control of holes Control of holes Control of forces Control of forces•
•
Face
Face
-
-
seal wall
seal wall
also known as Barrier wall
also known as Barrier wall
or Surface
or Surface
-
-
sealed wall
sealed wall
•
•
Cavity wall,
Cavity wall,
•
•
Rain screen wall,
Rain screen wall,
•
•
Pressure
Pressure
-
-
“controlled”
“controlled”
wall
Keep Going!
• Assume some water will get in, and design ways to get it out quickly and through a route that can handle wetness
• Rainscreen wall approach provides such a second line of defense
• Face seal wall approach provides only one line of defense. When that fails...
One more!
• Rainscreen wall includes an air barrier system, a capillarity break (cavity), a water-resistant drainage path to the outside, large vent area, some
compartmentation
The “Lack of” syndrome
• Lack of design detailing
• Lack of communication between field and design teams
• Lack of field supervision & coordination and quality control
LEAD to
Air Convection Loops Without
Through-Flow
Air flow in and out of an external air cavity
INT. EXT.
Air flow into a stud cavity, and back inside
Cold air circulation between materials
INT. EXT.
Vertical wall section External
air barrier system
Insulating sheathing
Cold air circulation between materials
INT. EXT.
Vertical wall section External
air barrier system
Insulating sheathing
Airtightness of the AB System
15-60 60- 170 170-800 > 800 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20Max. Air Leakage Rate
at 75 Pa (L/(s
•
m
2
)
For 35% RH, 22°C indoors
Water vapour permeance of outmost
unvented wall layer (ng/Pa•s•m
2)
R value on Outside of Low Air & Vapour
Perm Materials, as a Function of Climate
Heating Degree-Days (HDD)
< 4999
5000s 6000s 7000s 8000s 9000s 10000s11000s12000 & up
Increasing period+ intensity of cold temperatures
Ratio of outboard to inboard
R value 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.1
Increasing R value on the outside of low perm material
Fredericton Edmonton
Then the Open Rain Screen was Born…
• In 1962 Norwegian Building Research Institute published
Curtain Walls, in which Mr. Birkeland wrote:
– “The only practical solution (to the problem of water
leakage) is to design the exterior rain-proof finishing so open that no super-pressure can be created over the joints… The surges of pressure created by the gusts of wind will then be equalized on both sides of the exterior finishing.”
• In 1963 Kirby Garden at NRC Canada wrote Canadian Building Digest Rain Penetration and its Control.
– Control of ALL FORCES acting on exterior wall – Importance of air leakage control to gain rain
penetration control and pressure equalization • In 1971 the Architectural Aluminum Manufacturers
Association published “The Rain screen Principle and Pressure-equalized wall design
Plane of
airtightness of the wall
Interior Interior
Face-seal approach applied to a precast concrete panel cladding wall
Face-seal Approach
One-stage joint Two-stage joint Horizontal sectionTowards Rainscreen:
Rainscreen:
• • • • • Rain screen
• Effective vent area • Vent location
• Design loads • Stiffness
Wind driven rain Air Barrier System
• Effective leakage area • Design loads
• Stiffness
Chamber
Depth & Volume Air permeability
Drainage (flashing & drainage holes)
Delimiters •
Exterior Interior
Features of a Pressure-equalized Rain
Screen Wall
Water resistance of inner boundary
Wrap Up 1/4
• Barrier walls: Single protection without any redundancy. Watertightness based on perfection of exterior seals.
Once exterior seals fail, water cannot get out. High maintenance costs for sealants, too often triggered by water damage
• Mass walls: single protection but with some redundancy.
Weatherproofing based on absorptive property of large mass of masonry or concrete and evaporative drying. Problems tend to be corrosion of metals embedded in masonry, freeze thaw damage or rain ingress at joints
• Cavity walls: dual protection by means of a drained and
flashed clear cavity behind cladding and second line of defense (moisture barrier). Has been successful when combined with careful detailing and where wind-driven rain pressures were not high
• Variation: Ventilated cavity walls, which provide the dual protection of cavity walls, with the addition of vents top and bottom of compartment to promote drying of wall. Several modelling studies underway in this area
Wrap Up 3/4
• Rain Screen walls: Multiple protection & redundancy of the cavity wall, with addition of the control of air flow .
– Requires an effective air barrier system inside the wall.
– Requires more venting than typically provided in cavity walls. – Requires control of lateral air flow behind the cladding with
compartment separators
• Has been used successfully in panelized wall systems and curtain walls exposed to high wind-driven rain
pressures. Can reduce wind loads on cladding. • Several terms used in industry:
Pressure-equalized; moderated ; pressure-compartimentalized