HAL Id: jpa-00224059
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/jpa-00224059
Submitted on 1 Jan 1984
HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.
L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.
DYNAMICAL EFFECTS IN NEUTRON OPTICS AND SPIN INTERACTIONS
M. Forte
To cite this version:
M. Forte. DYNAMICAL EFFECTS IN NEUTRON OPTICS AND SPIN INTERACTIONS. Journal de Physique Colloques, 1984, 45 (C3), pp.C3-249-C3-253. �10.1051/jphyscol:1984342�. �jpa-00224059�
DYNAMICAL EFFECTS IN NEUTRON OPTICS AND SPIN INTERACTIONS
M. Forte
Physics Division, J o i n t Research Centre - I s p r a Establishment, 21020 I s p r a (Val, I t a l y
Re'sume' - On e'tudie l a production d ' e f f e t s d'optique neutronique qui sont s e n s i b l e s 2 la diffusion non-en avant du spin d a n s l e s conditions de l a diffraction dynamique. On considgre l e s c a s d e s i n t e r a c t i o n s s p i n - o r b i t e e t d e s i n t e r a c t i o n s hypothe'tiques qui violent P e t T .
A b s t r a c t - The g e n e r a t i o n of neutron optical effects, which a r e s e n s i t i v e t o non-forward spin s c a t t e r i n g i n dynamical diffraction conditions, i s studied. C a s e s of s p i n - o r b i t and of supposed P and T violating i n t e r a c t i o n s a r e considered.
In the study of low-energy neutron s p i n i n t e r a c t i o n s , the m o s t s e n s i t i v e e x p e r i - m e n t s a r e based on neutron optical effects. We c o n s i d e r , f o r example, the P- violation effects, namely the s p i n rotation and the helicity-dependent t r a n s m i s s i o n due to weak c u r r e n t s i n the neutron n u c l e a r i n t e r a c t i o n , ,which have been observed with v a r i o u s n u c l e a r t a r g e t s and a r e reviewed i n different p a p e r s of t h i s Workshop.
Effects of the f i r s t and of the second kind a r e d e t e r m i n e d , r e s p e c t i v e l y , by the r e a l and by the i m a g i n a r y spin-dependent p a r t of the optical potential. In o r d i n a r y t a r g e t s , the optical potential i s proportional to the f o r w a r d coherent s c a t t e r i n g f a c t o r Fo of t a r g e t c e n t r e s , thus excluding the possibility of optical effects r e l a t e d to s p i n - o r b i t and t o o t h e r spin i n t e r a c t i o n s , violating both the P and T s y m m e t r y , which do not contribute to f o r w a r d s c a t t e r i n g .
In a p e r f e c t c r y s t a l , instead, the propagation of c o h e r e n t neutron waves, a p p r o a c h - ing diffraction conditions ko-lch =
=
( r e c i p r o c a l lattice v e c t o r ) , i s s t r o n g l y depen- dent on the p e r i o d i c a l potential s t r u c t u r e , _which a p p e a r s i n the e x p r e s s i o n of the wave v e c t o r s i n the combination FhF-h = FF of the reflection and a n t i r e f l e c t i o n s t r u c t u r e f a c t o r s . T h e r e f o r e , coherent s p i n effects r e l a t e d t o non-forward spin s c a t t e r i n g a r e possible and c a n be d e s c r i b e d by the dynamical t h e o r y of diffraction.Different a s p e c t s and c a s e s a r e considered i n a previous work /1/ (and r e f e r e n c e s t h e r e i n ) , looking a t spin effects i n the e m e r g e n t t r a n s m i t t e d and r e f l e c t e d neutron beams. We s h o r t l y r e v i e w a few r e l e v a n t points.
The s c a t t e r i n g amplitudes, f o r the considered spin interactions, a r e a n t i s y m m e - t r i c : f6(k, k t ) = - & ( k t , h). In t h i s c a s e , a non-monoatomic a c e n t r i c s t r u c t u r e i s n e c e s s a r y t o have spin t e r m s in F F . Assuming a complex f, = ( s t i s ' ) o3 and a r e a l n u c l e a r amplitude fn, and s e p a r a t i n g the contributions of e a c h amplitude t e r m , we have
The r e l e v a n t spin t e r m s , r e f e r r i n g the r e l a t i v e phase a n g l e s t o 6 , = 0, a r e given by
R ~ ( F F ) O / 1 F, I = -2(F$ I s i n 6;, I ~ ( F F ) , / IFn I = 2 s i n 6,
and produce, r e s p e c t i v e l y , spin rotation and s p i n t r a n s m i s s i o n effects. The r o l e of r e a l and i m a g i n a r y amplitudes i s exchanged, with r e s p e c t t o o r d i n a r y optics,
Article published online by EDP Sciences and available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/jphyscol:1984342
C3-250 JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE
and t h e magnitude of s p i n effects i s e s s e n t i a l l y independent of IF,)
.
The e l e c t r o m a g n e t i c s p i n - o r b i t i n t e r a c t i o n g i v e s a p u r e i m a g i n a r y amplitude f S a i/.g.kxklFe, with Fe the e l e c t r i c a t o m f o r m f a c t o r . Related spin r o t a t i o n effects c a n be quite l a r g e , f o r example r o t a t i o n a n g l e s p e r c m a1
-
1 , in the c a s e of quartz and, t h e r e f o r e , could offer a r e a l i s t i c possibility to s t a r t a n e x p e r i m e n t a l i n v e s t i - gation of d y n a m i c a l spin effects with perfect and non-perfect c r y s t a l s .The n u c l e a r s p i n - o r b i t is usually negligible, but c a n be enhanced, with a complex amplitude, i n the p r e s e n c e of n e a r - t h r e s h o l d p - r e s o n a n c e s . R e f e r r i n g t o known n u c l e a r p a r a m e t e r s , but to hypothetical c r y s t a l s a m p l e s , we e s t i m a t e s p i n r o t a - tions a 1 2. ,., 1 0 - 3 and polarization t r a n s m i s s i o n e f f e c t s p e r c m = 1 0 - 3 "
10-4. A d i r e c t d e t e r m i n a t i o n of t h e s e p-wave effects a t threshold, with p a r t i c u l a r nuclei, m a y be i n t e r e s t i n g in connection with P-violation e x p e r i m e n t s .
A simultaneous violation of P and T i n the neutron-nucleon i n t e r a c t i o n would allow a t e r m f poc ~i G p ~ ~ ( h - k t ) i n n u c l e a r s c a t t e r i n g /2/. In the vicinity of a p - r e s o - nance, f pi s expected t o be s t r o n g l y enhanced and complex, in analogy with P- ~ odd T - e v e n i n t e r a c t i o n s / 3 / . We m a y a l s o r e f e r t o known enhanced P-violation ef- f e c t s and t o a s s u m p t i o n s on the r e l a t i v e coupling s t r e n g t h G P T / G ~ / 2 , 4 / , f o r a n indicative upper l i m i t e s t i m a t e : a1 (, f o r t h e r m a l neutrons and a 1 Z P1 d 10-4 a t r e s o n a n c e , in a g r e e m e n t with the e s t i m a t e f o r a n o t h e r kind of P- and T-viola- tion effects, a t the 0.75 eV p - r e s o n a n c e of 139 La /4/.
A m o s t advanced investigation of P and T violation i n fundamental interactions is the s e a r c h f o r a neutron e l e c t r i c dipole moment, i n f r e e - n e u t r o n r e s o n a n c e expe- r i m e n t s r e p o r t e d i n t h i s Workshop. The neutron a t o m i c s c a t t e r i n g includes a n EDM amplitude of the f o r m ~ E D M oc ipecr(h-&')re. An evaluation of the r e l a t e d s p i n r o t a t i o n in a q u a r t z c r y s t a l gives, f o r favourable r e f l e c t i o n s , a l ( r a d / c m ) % l o 1 9 !?
with R (cm) = p e / e . A conceivable EDM e x p e r i m e n t should be based on a back- r e f l e c t i o n configuration, i n the Bragg c a s e , to s u p p r e s s s p i n - o r b i t effects. P a r t i - c u l a r techniques and feasibility p r o b l e m s a r e d i s c u s s e d in / I / .
A l s o f o r the possibility of a n e x p e r i m e n t a l investigation of r e l a t i v e l y l a r g e effects, a c r u c i a l problem i s the existence of a suitable c r y s t a l t a r g e t . A c e n t r i c s t r u c t u r e s a r e not s o r a r e a n d , i n a few c a s e s , c r y s t a l s of good quality a r e available inclu- ding a v a r i e t y of nuclides, however, a question t o be f i r s t investigated c o n c e r n s the d e g r e e of perfection which i s r e a l l y c r i t i c a l t o o b s e r v e dynamical s p i n effects.
In the next p a r t of t h i s w o r k we a n a l z s e the g e n e r a t i o n of spin effects inside a p e r - fect c r y s t a l . C e r t a i n p a r a m e t e r s a r e defined i n the u s u a l way by boundary condi- tions which r e f e r t o a plane plate of thickness d , however we will put into evidence r a t h e r g e n e r a l r e l a t i o n s and r e s u l t s , r e l e v a n t f o r a f u r t h e r investigation of spin e f f e c t s i n non-perfect c r y s t a l s .
In the vicinity of a reflection, ko-kn = h, we c o n s i d e r the plane -wave solution in a p e r i o d i c a l potential
- A
where go = l / g o =Lo. fi and A ~ + / A , + - - = - z + / F . -
Continuity conditions a t the e n t r a n c e s u r f a c e , with a n incident wave 9E exp(i&. r),
d e t e r m i n e the d i r e c t i o n of fi, p a r a l l e l t o the ingoing n o r m a l , and
lco = k + (1/2) k Fogo% ( o r d i n a r y r e f r a c t i o n , taking Fo and F i n units of k2).
The phase velocities have the f o r m
H e r e X, with Zkg. h = h2, r e p r e s e n t s the deviation f r o m the c e n t r e of t h e d i f f r a c - tion line, o r r e s o n a n c e e r r o r , and _W i s the pendellosung frequency, while the r e - flection g e o m e t r y d e t e r m i n e s gh = kh. fi and g = l / g = go/gh. I c i s convenient t o s e - p a r a t e the n u c l e a r and the much s m a l l e r spin t e r m , writing FF = (FF),+FF)o, with (FF), % I Fn 1 (assuming a negligible a b s o r p t i o n ) and to introduce reduced units
.
w h e r e t i s the penetration depth in extinction length units, putting t = 0 a t the en- t r a n c e s u r f a c e . The spin effects a r e e s s e n t i a l l y due t o s p i n t e r m s i n the expozen- t i a l f a c t o r s of (Z), given by a reduced f o r m ( w h e r e got i s a coordinate along k o )
In o t h e r c a s e s we can safely a p p r o x i m a t e
In t h e Bragg c a s e , we implicitly exclude the r a n g e where w2 ,< 0 (no t r a n s m i s s i o n ) . The amplitude r a t i o i s d e t e r m i n e d by the boundary conditions %(O) = 0 i n the Laue c a s e and Ph(d) = 0 in the Bragg c a s e , obtaining r e s p e c t i v e l y
Ao+ = - + z ~ / ( z + - z ) and A = T Z F exp (Fiwgod) /N
- of.
with N the s u m of n u m e r a t o r s , t o have A o++Ao- = P (0) = P k(0) = 1. T h e r e f o r e , i n the Bragg c a s e , the wave a m p l i t u d e s include a pendglliisung f a c t o r , with a n effec- tive dependence on s p i n t e r m s .
The r e l a t i o n 1 of 1 2 / I ~ o , l ~ z - ' / z m e a n s that, f o r a sufficiently l a r g e r e s o - nance e r r o r ( s a y f o r w > , g1/2 in the B r a g g c a s e ) and corresponding t o i t s sign, t h e r e i s one dominant t r a n s m i t t e d wave, a s s o c i a t e d with the s m a l l e r of I z + I .
A qualitative validity of t h i s r e s u l t c a n be stated, i n g e n e r a l , by the physiczl a s s u m p t i o n I Ah+ / 2 + /(Ah- 1 < JAOt 1 + 1 AO- 1 2.
T o proceed, i t i s convenient t o c o n s i d e r the c u r r e n t d e n s i t i e s a s s o c i a t e d with '+'o(r) and qh(%, given by Lo, h ( ~ ) = ko, h(p*,, hyq, hh)- BY m e a n s of (2), d i s r e g a r d i n g t h e spin dependence, f o r the moment, and puttln k /A,+ l 2 = I,+., - k /AhL1 = Ih+, .Zf - = R + , - we obtain the flux density, f o r any Io+)?o-.
With our boundary conditions, a s i m p l e a l g e b r a d e t e r m i n e s the splitting r a t i o of t h e incident flux bk = kgo into 4, and $ h a t the s u r f a c e s , reproducing well known r e s u l t s . In the Bragg c a s e , r e f e r r i n g t o pendellosung a v e r a g e s { I o t } = R ~ / J R + - R - J we obtain { @(t) } = { 9 o(d) 1 = kgo w/ x (outgoing t r a n s m i t t e d flux).
Extending t h i s f o r m a l i s m , we define s p i n c u r r e n t d e n s i t i e s , r e g a r d i n g Po, h a s s p a c e x s p i n functions:
w h e r e i m a y be omitted. We f i r s t d e s c r i b e a s m a l l spin t r a n s m i s s i o n effect, due t o wo = i b o 3 , ( ( b d ( < < l ) . To evaluate the flux 6 . 2 3 of 0 3 , we have to take the d i f - f e r e n c e of J. fi i n the s p i n s t a t e s 03 = t 1. The r e s u l t
C3-252 JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE
shows a l i n e a r growth of the s p i n flux v e r s u s t , while the i n i t i a l value fiS(0) =
,.
nSh(0), f o r So(0) = 0 (unpolarized incident b e a m ) i s the negative of the outgoing spin flux of the reflected beam, i n the Bragg c a s e , and i s vanishing, i n t h e Lane c a s e . In s i m p l e w o r d s , i n ( 7 ) , the l i n e a r t e r m C r e p r e s e n t s the t o t a l neutron s p i n g e n e r a t e d by the i n t e r a c t i o n and c a r r i e d t o the s u r f a c e s by the t r a n s m i t t e d and r e f l e c t e d b e a m s , while the constant t e r m i s due to the inherent spin depen- dence of I,+, depending on boundary conditions. --
The equivalent f o r m C = -2bt ~ o + ( l + g ~ + ) - I ~ - ( ~ + ~ R - ) ] allows to v e r i f y t h a t , i n the Bragg c a s e , on e i t h e r side of the t r a n s m i s s i o n c u r v e , (that i s f o r -gRt < 1 and -gR- > l o r v i c e v e r s a ) the sign of Z i s uniquely defined and r e v e r s e s like x.
T h i s r e l e v a n t r e s u l t i s valid in g e n e r a l .
Our boundary conditions give Ih+ = Ih- and, t h e r e f o r e , 2 = - 2 b t ( I o t - ~ o - ) . In the Bragg c a s e , the pendelltjsung a v e r a g e i s ; C } = -2bt x/l X I . In the Laae c a s e
Z = g. S = gS0, with no s p i n effect i n J h (with no n u c l e a r absorption).
F i n a l l y , we c a n evaluate the neutron flux polarization, given by
In the Bragg c a s e , where P ( d ) i s the t r a n s m i t t e d beam polarization, we have
I n { P 3 ( t ) } , only the constant t e r m i s a n a v e r a g e . According t o (9) and (4), some enhancement of spin effects (not included i n o u r previous e s t i m a t e s ) i s expected n e a r the t o t a l reflection edge (w + 0) and it\ a s y m m e t r i c reflection w i t h l g \ > > l , i n the Laue c a s e too.
To d e s c r i b e the s p i n r o t a t i o n around f 3, due t o wu = a 3 , with I a d ] <<I, we m a y c o n s i d e r a n incident beam completely polarized along X I . The s a m e f o r m a l r e l a - tions a r e obtained but with -a, S 2 , P 2 , e t c . , in place of b, S3, P g , etc. The a p p r o x - imate s p i n r o t a t i o n i s then given by P2.
F o r a sufficiently l a r g e r e s o n a n c e e r r o r and a r e l a t i v e l y low reflection intensity, t h e r e i s a predominant Io+ o r I,-, with a s p i n phase-velocity t w o o r -wo, c o r - responding t o the e r r o r sign. In this a p p r o a c h , by dividing (7) by ( 5 ) , we obtain the s i m p l e r e l a t i o n P3x -2bgot ( x / l x l ) , w h e r e b cx g w - l , and the analogous f o r P2.
In g e n e r a l , i n the l i m i t ~ 2 > > ~ ~ F , t h a t i s W % X = g(8-$B), a solution (2) r e d u c e s t o one r e f r a c t e d y a v e propagating in a d i r e c t i o n n e a r ko, in a spin-dependent op- t i c a l potential ( F F ) u / 2 ( 8 - 8 B ) . T h i s f o r m , independent of boundary conditions, r e p r e s e n t s the effective dynamical o r "resonance" neutron s p i n i n t e r a c t i o n with the c r y s t a l .
A r e l e v a n t question c o n c e r n s the existence of c o h e r e n t s p i n effects in n o n - p e r f e c t c r y s t a l s , where the optical-potential periodicity i s a l t e r e d . In this c a s e , s i m p l e plane wave solutions like (2) do not apply, but m a y be r e p l a c e d following Takagi /5, 6/, by wave packets with a s p a c e r e p r e s e n t a t i o n
where D o ( r ) , Dh(x) a r e ( n a r r o w ) d i s t r i b u t i o n functions a r o u n d r e f r a c t e d and r e f l e c - t e d n e u t r o n t r a j e c t o r i e s , which s a t i s f y p a r t i a l d i f f e r e n t i a l equations of the kind
position, a p p e a r s i n X' = X-k-l(a/aqh)h. y ( r ) , w h e r e i s the d i s p l a c e m e n t of the a t o m s of a unit c e l l ( r e g a r d e d a s r i g i d ) with r e s p e c t t o a p e r f e c t r e f e r e n c e l a t t i c e , f o r which X i s defined. Usually, the second t e r m in XI i s a s s u m e d relatively s m a l l and slowly varying. In regions with no d i s t o r t i o n , the Takagi equations a r e s a t i s - fied by a packet of o r d i n a r y solutions (2). A s a f i r s t a p p r o a c h we c o n s i d e r the c a s e of a back r e f l e c t i o n , i n the Bragg c a s e , i n a s y s t e m composed of q u a s i - p e r f e c t blocks of a sufficient s i z e ( a t l e a s t s e v e r a l estinction lengths) with t i l t a n g l e s , r e - lative t o the r e f e r e n c e l a t t i c e , definitely l e s s than the i n t r i n s i c width of the r e f l e c - t i o n ( d m i n u t e s ) . T h e r e f o r e , i n a n y block, g = -1 and X t ( r ) X ( r e f e r e n c e value, d e t e r m i n e d by k). F o r neutrons t r a n s m i t t e d on a given side of the t r a n s m i s s i o n c u r v e , a s u b s t a n t i a l spin effect will r e s u l t by the accumulation of r e g u l a r i n c r e - m e n t s i n e a c h block while weak i r r e g u l a r spin changes through g r a i n boundaries m a y be d i s r e g a r d e d .
The influence of lattice d i s t o r t i o n c a n be studied by eq. (1 1) with (a/aqh) = -(a/aqo),
which m a y be r e w r i t t e n i n reduced units t=klFn1 qo, x1=x'/1Fn(, e t c . The equation a d m i t s a +ble solution iDo(x). I t is e a s i l y s e e n that, by introducing a s m a l l s p i n t e r m in FF = J F , ) ~ + (FF), = IFn 1' (l+ccr3), the solution i s v a r i e d , a p p r o x i m a t e - ly, by a f a c t o r exp[io3 b+(t)] - (for 6+ - <<l), such that
(L c/2w1)dt, with w' = (x12-1) 1 /2
T h e r e f o r e , a l s o in non-periodical solutions Do+, r e s p e c t i v e spin-dependent p h a s e - f a c t o r s c a n be s e p a r a t e d (with 6 + ( t ) depending En the neutron t r a j e c t o r y ) and s p i n c o h e r e n c e i s p r e s e r v e d . T h i s s i m p l e extension of the p e r f e c t - l a t t i c e c a s e (where w ' ( ~ ) = w and c/2w1 = a o r ib) s p e c i f i e s the qualitative d e s c r i p t i o n of s p i n effects i n the previous p i c t u r e , and allows to f o r e s e e qualitatively s i m i l a r effects i n d i s - t o r t e d blocks and in the whole c r y s t a l . Indeed, with reasonable physical a s s u m p - t i o n s , f u r t h e r considerations following the line of previous c a s e s , support the s i g n coherence of spin effects along neutron t r a j e c t o r i e s , when the t r a n s m i s s i o n o c c u r s on one side of the effective r e f l e c t i o n c u r v e (including d i s t o r t i o n and m o s a - i c broadening and a s s u m i n g no s a t e l l i t e s ) . In p a r t i c u l a r , a d e s c r i p t i o n with one wave-packet ( e i t h e r Do+, 6+ o r Do-, 6, ) i s meaningful in the l i m i t of a good t r a n s - m i s s i o n i n analogy with the p e r f e c t c r y s t a l c a s e .
In s u m m a r y , tke existence of c o h e r e n t s p i n effects d o e s not n e c e s s a r i l y r e q u i r e a long-range coherence of neutron waves but, a t l e a s t a sign coherence of the diffe- r e n t i a l spin-dependent phase velocity ( o r attenuation) along the neutron t r a j e c t o r i e s . The p r e s e n t d i s c u s s i o n i s p r e l i m i n a r y , and d o e s not c o n s i d e r , f o r instance, the r o l e of waves r e f l e c t e d and diffused by c r y s t a l i m p e r f e c t i o n s . B e s i d e s the e x - a c t back-reflection, o t h e r c a s e s should be considered. Finally, we suggest t h a t a n a l t e r n a t i v e m e c h a n i s m f o r the s e l e c t i o n of neutron waves with univocal spin e f f e c t s i s n a t u r a l l y o c c u r r i n g in ( m o d e r a t e l y ) absorbing c r y s t a l s and, p a r t i c u l a r l y , i n the anomalous t r a n s m i s s i o n ( a l s o i n the reflection) i n the Laue c a s e .
R e f e r e n c e s
/1/ FORTE M . , Conf. Neutron and i t s Application, Cambridge (1982) Contr.
4. B. 4 and J. Phys. G. 4 (1983) 745.
/2/ SZYMANSKI Z . , N u c l . P h y s . A E ( l 9 6 8 ) 385.
/3/ FORTE M. , Fundamental P h y s i c s with R e a c t o r Neutron and Neutrinos (1 977) Inst. Phys. Conf. S e r . 42 (1978).
/4/ BUNAKOV V. E. and GUDKOV V. P . , Leningrad, Nucl. Phys. Inst. P r e p r i n t 777 (1982).
/5/ TAKAGI S . , Acta C r y s t . 3 (1 962) 23.
/6/ TAKAGI S . , J. Phys. Japan, 26 (1969) 1239.