• Aucun résultat trouvé

Comment on "Obliquely propagating large amplitude solitary waves in charge neutral plasmas" by F. Verheest, Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 14, 49?57, 2007

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Comment on "Obliquely propagating large amplitude solitary waves in charge neutral plasmas" by F. Verheest, Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 14, 49?57, 2007"

Copied!
3
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HAL Id: hal-00300114

https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00300114

Submitted on 27 Aug 2007

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access

archive for the deposit and dissemination of

sci-entific research documents, whether they are

pub-lished or not. The documents may come from

teaching and research institutions in France or

abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est

destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents

scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,

émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de

recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires

publics ou privés.

Comment on ”Obliquely propagating large amplitude

solitary waves in charge neutral plasmas” by F.

Verheest, Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 14, 49?57, 2007

J. F. Mckenzie, E. Dubinin, K. Sauer

To cite this version:

J. F. Mckenzie, E. Dubinin, K. Sauer. Comment on ”Obliquely propagating large amplitude solitary

waves in charge neutral plasmas” by F. Verheest, Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 14, 49?57, 2007.

Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics, European Geosciences Union (EGU), 2007, 14 (4), pp.543-544.

�hal-00300114�

(2)

Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 14, 543–544, 2007 www.nonlin-processes-geophys.net/14/543/2007/ © Author(s) 2007. This work is licensed

under a Creative Commons License.

Nonlinear Processes

in Geophysics

Comment on “Obliquely propagating large amplitude solitary waves

in charge neutral plasmas” by F. Verheest, Nonlin. Processes

Geophys., 14, 49–57, 2007

J. F. McKenzie1, E. Dubinin2, and K. Sauer2

1Schools of Pure and Applied Physics and Mathematical Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa 2Max-Planck Institut f¨ur Sonnensystemforschung, Katlenburg-Lindau, Germany

Received: 15 May 2007 – Revised: 10 August 2007 – Accepted: 17 August 2007 – Published: 27 August 2007

In a recent paper on nonlinear stationary waves in a mag-netized plasma, Verheest (2007) imposed the constraint of “strict” charge neutrality by which is meant that simultane-ously with ni=nethe longitudinal electric field Exis strictly

zero. Armed with this constraint Verheest (2007) goes on to show that nonlinear whistler waves, oscillitons and obliquely propagating Hall-MHD solitons do not exist. This is a case of throwing the baby out with the bathwater.

There are circumstances in which quasi-charge neutrality holds with ni≈nebut divE6=0. The nonrelativistic whistler

wave is one such circumstance. In this case we may write Poisson’s equation in the form

1 ω2 pe d dx( eEx me ) = δn n (1)

in which ωpe is the electron plasma frequency and δn/n

is the ratio of excess of ions over electrons to the plasma density. The whistler oscilliton propagates at approximately

VAe/2 speed (where VAe is the Alfven speed based on the

electron mass density) with a characteristic length scale

VAe/ e (where e is the electron gyrofrequency) and an

electron acceleration VAee/4 (see e.g. Sauer et al., 2002;

Dubinin et al., 2003; McKenzie et al., 2004; Mace et al., 2007). Equation (1) then shows that

δn n ∼ 2e 4ω2 pe =V 2 Ae 4c2 (2)

Hence quasi-charge neutrality ni≈neand Ex6=0 is a good

ap-proximation if the wave speed VAe/2 is not relativistic.

Ac-cording to Chen (1984) “the novice finds this property diffi-cult to understand”. On the other hand, if VAe is of the order

of c then we must not only use Poisson’s equation but also the equations of motion must be made relativistic as discussed by McKenzie et al. (2005).

Correspondence to: E. Dubinin (dubinin@mps.mpg.de)

A similar argument can be made for Hall-MHD solitons in which the acceleration of the protons is 0(VAp), the

length scale is VA/ p yielding the fractional charge

sep-aration δn/n∼2p/ω2pi=VA2/c2, where VA and p are the

Alfven speed based on the proton mass density and the pro-ton gyrofrequency, respectively, demanding that δn/n is rel-ativistically small and divE6=0. This is the reason why the standard Hall-MHD equations do not require Poisson’s equa-tion and do not impose any constraint on divE. The electric fields are derived from Faraday’s law and the equations of the motion together with the condition divj =0. Poisson’s equation provides us only with an estimate of the charge sep-aration ratio δn/n as was shown above.

In the classic nonlinear wave propagating transverse to the magnetic field (Adlam-Allen, 1958; Sagdeev, 1966) the cir-cumstances are not quasi-charge neutral. In fact, such an assumption would violate conservation of longitudinal mo-mentum requiring a balance between dynamic pressure and magnetic pressure. It is interesting that in this case the elec-tric stresses are again relativistically small compared with magnetic stresses (pressure) but Poisson’s equation is not re-quired even with ni6=ne(McKenzie et al., 2001).

By setting Ex=0 simultaneously with ni=ne(uix=uex)

Verheest (2007) has taken a wrong turning and got a paradoxical result even for the linear (evanescent) waves. In conclusion, note that a question of using Poisson’s equation versus the quasineutrality condition is not a new one. It was discussed and clarified 40 years ago in the classical review paper by Braginskii (1965).

Edited by: J. B¨uchner

Reviewed by: M. Leubner and another anonymous referee

(3)

544 J. F. McKenzie et al.: Comment on “Obliquely propagating large amplitude solitary waves in charge neutral plasmas” References

Adlam, J. H. and Allen, E.: The structure of strong collision-free hydromagnetic waves, Phil. Mag., 3, 448, 1958.

Braginskii, S. I.: Transport processes in a plasma, in: Reviews of Plasma Physics, v. 1, edited by: Leontovich, M. A., Consultants Bureau, New-York, 1965.

Chen, F. F.: in: Plasma Physics. Controlled Fusion, p. 77, Plenum Press, New-York, 1984.

Dubinin, E., Sauer, K., and McKenzie, J. F.: Nonlinear station-ary whistler waves and whistler solitons (oscillitons). Exact so-lutions, J. Plasma Phys., 69, 305–330, 2003.

Mace, R. L., McKenzie, J. F., and Webb, G. M.: Conservation laws for steady flow and solitons in multi-fluid plasma revisited,, Phys. Plasmas, 14, 012310-1, 2007.

McKenzie, J. F., Dubinin, E., and Sauer, K.: Nonlinear waves prop-agating transverse to the magnetic field, J. Plasma Phys., 65, 213–233, 2001.

McKenzie, J. F., Dubinin, E., Sauer, K., and Doyle, T. B.: The appli-cation of the constants of motion to nonlinear stationary waves in complex plasmas: a unified fluid dynamic viewpoint, J. Plasma Phys., 70, 431–462, 2004.

Sagdeev, R. Z.: Cooperative phenomena and shock waves in colli-sionless plasmas, in: Reviews of Plasma Physics, v. 4, edited by: Leontovich, M. A., Consultants Bureau, New-York, p. 23, 1966. Sauer, K., Dubinin, E., and McKenzie, J. F.: Wave emission by whistler oscillitons: Application to “coherent lion roars”, Geo-phys. Res. Lett., 29, 2226, doi:10.1029/2002GL015771, 2002. Verheest, F.: Obliquely propagating large amplitude

soli-tary waves in charge neutral plasmas, Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 14, 49–57, 2007, http://www.nonlin-processes-geophys.net/14/49/2007/.

Références

Documents relatifs

In (Mottez 2012a), the numerical simulations put in evidence the settlement of non oscillatory parallel electric field (if the waves polarisation are appropriate), its

Figure 2 presents the sound pressure level in the cavity, as well as the speedup factor (SU) with respect to the direct resolution by FE, when FE or CMS is used for the acoustic

2 - Power versus effective index characteristics (a) for a single interface separating two self-focussing nonlinear dielectric media and (b) for a symmetric

Il est donc souvent intéressant, et même essentiel dans certains cas, d’utiliser les caractéristiques physicochimiques des calcifications comme outil diagnostique et de

Development of origin–destination matrices using mobile phone call data The MIT Faculty has made this article openly available.. Please share how this access

In summation, both protein and small molecule drugs are limited in that they cannot target every disease-relevant protein or gene. The mRNA and DNA precursors of

From the top to the bottom are (i) the transverse velocities and the total value of the transverse speed of the electrons, (ii) the longitudinal velocities of the protons (solid