• Aucun résultat trouvé

Effects of tree species diversity on resistance to natural disturbances in planted forests

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Effects of tree species diversity on resistance to natural disturbances in planted forests"

Copied!
27
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HAL Id: hal-02793549

https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-02793549

Submitted on 5 Jun 2020

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

Effects of tree species diversity on resistance to natural disturbances in planted forests

Herve Jactel, Johanna Boberg, Damien Bonal, Bastien Castagneyrol, Barry Gardiner, José-Ramon Gonzalez, Julia Koricheva, Nicolas Meurisse, Eckehard

Brockerhoff

To cite this version:

Herve Jactel, Johanna Boberg, Damien Bonal, Bastien Castagneyrol, Barry Gardiner, et al.. Effects of tree species diversity on resistance to natural disturbances in planted forests. 5. International Eco- Summit. EcoSummit 2016. Ecological Sustainability: Engineering Change., Aug 2016, Montpellier, France. 26 p. �hal-02793549�

(2)

Effects of tree species diversity

on resistance to natural disturbances in planted forests

Hervé Jactel, Johanna Boberg , Damien Bonal, Bastien Castagneyrol, Barry Gardiner, José-Ramon Gonzalez, Julia Koricheva, Nicolas Meurisse,

Eckehard Brockerhoff

http://www.waldwissen.net

(3)

An urgent need for new, planted forests

1. to meet the social demand for wood products including energy wood

2. to contribute to climate change mitigation through carbon sequestration

3. to alleviate the logging pressure

on natural forests and preserve biodiversity

(4)

Rising threats due to global change

1.

Climate change

temperatures trigger pest outbreaks and range expansion

2006 1979 2011

Pine processionary moth

Mountain pine beetle

(5)

Rising threats due to global change

1.

Climate change

droughts increase the risk of forest fires

droughts increase tree susceptibility to infection

(6)

Rising threats due to global change

1.

Climate change

wind damage

(7)

Rising threats due to global change

2.

World trade

globalization results in more biological invasions

Exotic arthropods

N u m b er n ew s p e c ie s / ye ar

Dryocosmus kuriphilus

Origine: China

(8)

Challenge: design new planted forests less vulnerable on the long term

• Trees are being planted for decades or centuries

• Forests will experience disturbances never met before

(9)

Is mixing tree species in planted forest an option?

Diversity – resistance relationships in grasslands

(10)

Resistance of mixed forests to 7 natural disturbances

1.

Patterns of response to tree diversity

2.

Underlying ecological mechanisms

1.

Drought

2.

Fire

3.

Windstorm

4.

Mammal herbivores

5.

Pest insects

6.

Fungal pathogens

7.

Invasive species

William M. Ciesla, Forest Health Management International, Bugwood.org

http://www.redbubble.com/people/bberwyn

(11)

1. Resistance of mixed forests to drought

Water Use Efficiency = Productivity / Transpiration

http://dnr.wi.gov/

(12)

2. Resistance of mixed forests to fires

Light Severe

http://www.sierraforestlegacy.org

(13)

3. Resistance of mixed forests to windstorms

http://iireporter.com

(14)

4. Resistance of mixed forest to mammal herbivores

Contrasting effects on mammal herbivores

(15)

-150%

-100%

-50%

0%

50%

100%

150%

200%

36 % less damage in mixed forests

(80% cases)

5. Resistance of mixed forest to pest insects

119 case studies, 33 tree species

-31%

(16)

6. Resistance of mixed forest to fungal pathogens

Overall better resistance of mixed forests to root rot fungi

Resistance or neutral effects for foliar pathogens

(17)

7. Resistance of mixed forests to invasive species

M ea n % d ef o lia ti o n p er p lo t

Tree species richness

(18)

- 42% - 15% 0%

Resistance of mixed forests: common features

1.

Direction and magnitude of effects depend on pest specialization

Castagneyrol et al. 2014

-

Spill over

-

Mixing diet

(19)

Resistance of mixed forests: common features

2.

Forest composition more important than tree species richness

-60%

-50%

-40%

-30%

-20%

-10%

0%

% d a m a g e re d u ct io n

conifer conifer

broadl.

broadl.

broadl.

conifer

conifer broadl.

– 27%

– 45%

(20)

Resistance of mixed forests: common features

3.

“Associational resistance” operate at several, nested spatial scales

Tree scale

Neighbors identity

Stand scale

Species composition

Landscape scale

Heterogeneity

(21)

Mechanisms underlying

diversity – resistance relationships

0. The insurance hypothesis

Being composed of several species with different functional traits,

mixed forests have a higher likelihood of containing resistant trees,

thus providing more opportunities to maintain a forest cover

and sustain basic ecosystem functions on the long term

(22)

Mechanisms underlying

diversity – resistance relationships

1.

Traits complementarity

-

Root depth / drought

-

Bark anatomy / fire

-

Crown architecture / wind

-

Leaf quality / herbivores

-

Niche occupancy / invasive species

(23)

Mechanisms underlying

diversity – resistance relationships

2.

Reduced density (amount) of susceptible trees

-

herbivores less likely to enter the plot

-

lower amount of resources/fuel

-

longer distance between host trees

Gerlach et al. 1997

T re e m o rt al it y d u e to A . o st o ya e in m ix ed s ta n d s

(24)

Mechanisms underlying

diversity – resistance relationships

3.

Reduced probability of susceptible trees being hit

Spruce - Fir Beech - Maple

B ro w s in g f re q u e n c y

Saplings planted

under Eglantine

-

physical protection by neighbors

-

diversion (decoy) processes

(25)

Mechanisms underlying

diversity – resistance relationships

4.

Reinforced multitrophic interactions

100% Scots pine

50% Scots pine – 50% Birch

Neodiprion sertifer

-

decomposers and mycorrhiza

-

natural enemies

(26)

Conclusions

1. Mixed forests : associational resistance >

susceptibility

2. Tree composition > species richness

3. Several scales, many processes involved

4. Tradeoffs for resistance to different disturbances?

5. Recommendations to forest managers:

• 2 species mixtures might be enough

• beyond the conifer – broadleaved mixtures

(27)

Thank you for your attention

http://mixedwoodecozone.weebly.com/natural-vegetation.html

Références

Documents relatifs

First, the full dbh growth model (Eq. 13) was fitted for each species group and for each of the preselected CIs, assuming nonequivalent neighborhood effects: β i1 ≠ β i2 ≠ β i3 ≠

The L 12 (t) function indicated that segregation was a more common pattern in the bivariate spatial distribution of the pairs of examined species (cherrybark oak, water oak,

ا لﻮﺳر ﻰﻠﻋ مﻼﺴﻟاو ةﻼﺼﻟاو ﷲ ﺪﻤﺤﻟا ﻪﺒﺤﺻو ﻪﻟا ﻰﻠﻋو ﷲ ﺪﻌﺑ ﺎﻣأ ﻦﻴﻌﻤﺟأ : ﺔﺠﻴﺘﻧ ﺪﺼﺤﻧ ﻦﺤﻧ ﺎﻫ دﺎﺠﻟا ﻞﻤﻌﻟاو دﺎﻬﺘﺟﻻا ﻦﻣ تاﻮﻨﺳ روﺮﻣ ﺪﻌﺑ ﻪﻳﺪﻬﻧ يﺬﻟا ﻊﺿاﻮﺘﻤﻟا ﻞﻤﻌﻟا اﺬﻬﺑ ﺎﻨﺒﻌﺗ ﻰﻟإ

لخدلما ةيبرعلا ةيؤرلاو بيرغلا يرظنتلا ةديدلجا ةياورلا 5 ةديدج ، درفنم روصتبو ةديدج ةيؤر قفوو لبقتو باعيتسا نود حلطصلما اذه

Left panel: Mean stellar population ages of MPGs as derived from the SED fitting as a function of redshift and mean stellar mass density for.. high- and low-Σ MPGs

A major challenge of using organically collected data for location discovery is that not all users accurately identify their locations when they contribute scans to

2, The "Proprietary Systems" World: Large Vendors of Incompatible Systems A useful starting point is the polar case in which there are several vendors of proprietary

The growth rate was lower when the tree was exposed to an increased water stress, but logging had an opposite effect insofar as it decreased competition among trees for