R ENDICONTI
del
S EMINARIO M ATEMATICO
della
U NIVERSITÀ DI P ADOVA
H. P AHLINGS
Errata-Corrige : “Some sporadic groups as Galois groups II”
Rendiconti del Seminario Matematico della Università di Padova, tome 85 (1991), p. 309-310
<http://www.numdam.org/item?id=RSMUP_1991__85__309_0>
© Rendiconti del Seminario Matematico della Università di Padova, 1991, tous droits réservés.
L’accès aux archives de la revue « Rendiconti del Seminario Matematico della Università di Padova » (http://rendiconti.math.unipd.it/) implique l’accord avec les conditions générales d’utilisation (http://www.numdam.org/conditions).
Toute utilisation commerciale ou impression systématique est constitutive d’une infraction pénale. Toute copie ou impression de ce fichier doit conte- nir la présente mention de copyright.
Article numérisé dans le cadre du programme Numérisation de documents anciens mathématiques
http://www.numdam.org/
ERRATA CORRIGE
«Some
Sporadic Groups
as GaloisGroups
II»(Rend.
Sem. Mat. Univ.Padova,
82(1989), 163-171)
H. PAHLINGS
(*)
There is an error in Lemma 1 of this paper. As Kai
Magaard (Yale University) observed, e = (2B, 3A, 10B)
of Aut(McL)
is not a rationalrigid triple.
Infact, li (e)
=0,
as elements g E2B, h
E 3A withgh
E 10Bgenerate
the maximalsubgroup 5++ 2 : 3: g . 2.
Furthermore,
in the table of theprimitive permutation
charactersof McL.2 in
[3]
the characterscorresponding
to34 : (Mlo
x2)
and3~ + 4 : 4. S 5
areinterchanged.
Nevertheless the Theorem of the paper remains correct. One has to
replace
Lemma 1b) by
LEMMA. For the rational class
structure e = (4B, 3A, 10B)
Aut(McL)
one has1’(e)
= 1 andn(e)
= 3. Thus e is rationalrigid
butnot
strictly rigid
in the sense of Serre[4].
PROOF. An easy
computation
with the character table of Aut(McL)
shows that
n(e)
= 3.Let g
E4B, h E
3A be such thatgh
E lOB. The table ofprimitive permutation
characters of Aut(McL)
shows that theonly
maximal
subgroups containing
elements of the classes4B, 3A,
and 10Bsimultaneously
areM1 = PSU(4, 3) :2, M2 = 34 : (Mlo x 2),
andM3 =
= 5+1+2:3:8·2
Looking
atMg/ O2,
it is obvious that aproduct
of an element oforder 4 and an element of order 3 cannot have order 10 in this group.
Likewise,
since the elements of 3A intersectM2
in a class contained inOg (M2 )
it is clear that aproduct
of elements of order 4 and of elements of order 10 inM2
cannot be in 3A nM2 .
Hence the
only
maximalsubgroups
of Aut(McL)
which can contain(*) Indirizzo dell’A.: Lehrstuhl fur Mathematik Rhein-Westf. Technische
Hochschule, Templergraben
64, D-5100Aachen, Rep.
Fed. Tedesca.310
(g, h)
areisomorphic
toM1= PS U(4, 3) : 2.
The fusion of the classes ofM1
intoAut(McL)
is obvious:3A, 4C,
and 10A ofMI correspond
to theclasses of the
triple e
and thecorresponding
normalized structure con-stant is 2. Observe that
MI
is the group namedPS U(4, 3) : 2g
in the AT- LAS.Looking
at the maximalsubgroups
ofM1
or at the table ofprimi-
tive
permutation
character of this group one seesimmediately
that anypair
ofelements x,
y with X E3A,
y E4C,
xy E 10A inM1 generates Ml .
So one concludes that
decomposes
into 3regular
orbits under theoperation
of Aut(McL)
withtwo orbits
having representatives
withHence
REMARK.
Replacing
Lemma 1b) by
the Lemmaabove,
i. e. 2Bby 4B,
theapplication by
W.Feit [1] (Beispiel
3 in Matzat’s paper[2]) showing
that is a Galois group overQ(t)
also remains cor-rect.
REFERENCES
[1] W. FEIT, Some
finite
groups with nontrivial centers which are Galois groups,Proceedings
of the 1987Singapore Conference, Berlin,
NewYork,
1989, pp. 87-109.
[2] B. H.
MATZAT, Frattini-Einbettungsprobleme
überHilbertkörpern, Manuscripta Mathematica,
to appear.[3] H.
PAHLINGS,
Somesporadic
groups as Galois groupsII,
Rend. Sem. Mat.Univ.
Padova,
82(1989),
pp. 163-171.[4] J.-P.
SERRE, Topics
in GaloisTheory,
Course at HarvardUniversity,
Fall1988,
Notes writtenby Henry Darmom,
tentativedraft, Cambridge,
1989.
Manoscritto pervenuto in redazione il 25 marzo 1991.