R ENDICONTI
del
S EMINARIO M ATEMATICO
della
U NIVERSITÀ DI P ADOVA
H. P AHLINGS
Some sporadic groups as Galois groups II
Rendiconti del Seminario Matematico della Università di Padova, tome 82 (1989), p. 163-171
<http://www.numdam.org/item?id=RSMUP_1989__82__163_0>
© Rendiconti del Seminario Matematico della Università di Padova, 1989, tous droits réservés.
L’accès aux archives de la revue « Rendiconti del Seminario Matematico della Università di Padova » (http://rendiconti.math.unipd.it/) implique l’accord avec les conditions générales d’utilisation (http://www.numdam.org/conditions).
Toute utilisation commerciale ou impression systématique est constitutive d’une infraction pénale. Toute copie ou impression de ce fichier doit conte- nir la présente mention de copyright.
Article numérisé dans le cadre du programme Numérisation de documents anciens mathématiques
http://www.numdam.org/
Sporadic Groups Groups
H. PAHLINGS
(*)
The purpose of this note is to
show,
that thesporadic simple
groups
J3 , MCL,
andLy
and theirautomorphism
groups are Galois groups overQ,
and what is more over the fieldQ(t)
of rationalfunctions
over Q. Taking
into account the results of various authors([2, 3, 4, 5, 9, 10];
see[6]
for anexposition
and summary of knownresults)
thisshows,
that all thesporadic simple
groups are Galois groupsover Q (or Q(t))
with thepossible exception
the Mathieu groupM23’
For this group the methods of this paper seem to be insufficient.We use the notation and definitions of the first
part
of thispaper
[9].
Inparticular
we use the notation of aGAR-realization,
which is of
importance
for the extensionproblem,
and state our mainresult as
THEOREM. The
sporadic simple
groupsJ3, .Ly
haveGAR-realizations over
Q(t).
As in
[9]
theproof
uses theRationality
Criteria ofBelyi,
Matzatand
Thompson
and follows from thefollowing
lemmas.LEMMA 1. For the rational class structure
(*) Indirizzo dell’A.: Lehrstuhl D ffr Math.
Templergraben
64, 5100Aachen
(R.F.T.).
164
one has
li(C)
=n(C)
= 1.Thus the groups Aut
(Ja),
Aut(McL),
Ru arerationally rigid
inthe sense of
Thompson [10].
LEMMA 2.
Ly
has a rational class structureHere, concerning
theconjugacy classes,
the notation of the ATLAS[1]
isused;
inparticular
2B is the class of outer involu- tions in or Aut The normalized structure constant of atriple C = ( C1, C2 ,
of classes of the groups G is denotedby n(C)
andli(C)
is the number of orbits of G onPROOF OF LEMMA 1.
a)
It iseasily
verified thatn(2B, 3B, 8B)
== 1.Let
9 E 2B,
be such that and let H =(g, h).
We show that H is not contained in a maximalsubgroup
of AutThe maximal
subgroups
of Aut(J,)
are(cf. [1]) Jg
and(up
to iso-morphism)
Using
theCAS-system (cf. [8])
the table of allprimitive
permu- tation characters of Aut has beencomputed.
This is useful forother
applications,
too. The result isreproduced
in theAppendix.
It
shows,
thatHi
does not contain elements of2B,
the groups.~.I4 , Hg
contain no elements of 8B andH7
no elements of 3B.Obviously H
cannot be contained inH2. Hs
has three normal sub- groups of index2,
onebeing
3 xMlO;
this group contains the ele- ments ofHs
n8B,
the cubes of elements of order24,
but no outerinvolutions,
i.e. elements of 2B. Soproducts
of elements ofg5
n 8Bwith those of n 2B cannot be contained in 3 x
A6
and hence donot have order 3.
Finally
the character table ofH8
has been com-puted
and its fusion into Aut(J,)
has been determined. It is repro- duced in theappendix.
An easycomputation
shows thatproducts
of elements of
g8
n 2B with elements of 3B are not in 8B.This shows that H is not contained in any maximal
subgroup
ofAut and so H = Aut
(J.,);
thusb)
In Aut we haven(2B, 3A, 10B) =
1. Let g E 2B h e 3A be such thatgh
E 10B and let .~ =(g, h~.
The maximal sub- groups of Aut(McL)
are(cf. [1])
McL and up toconjugation
The table of
primitive permutation
characters of Aut(.llTct) (cf.
Appendix) shows,
that theonly
maximalsubgroups
of Autwhich contain elements of the classes
2B7
3A and 10Asimultaneously
are
.H1
and84.
The intersection of2B,
3A and 10B withHl
arethe classes
2F,
3A and10 C, respectively,
y of the groupU,(3):2,,
inAtlas nota.tion
([l],
pp.54-55)
and an easycomputation
shows thatthe structure constant of this class
triple
vanishes.Finally,
since the elements of 3A intersect withH4
in a classcontained in the
elementary
abelian normalsubgroup
of order 34 itis
quite
clear that aproduct
of elements of order 2 with elements of order 10 inH4
is not in 3Ar1.H4 .
Thus H = Aut( McL)
and3B, 8B)
= 1.c)
Consider the classes2BI 4A,
13A of thesimple
group Ru andlet g E 2B,
be such thatgh E 13A.
For the normalized structure constant onegets n(2B, 4A,13A )
= 1. Put H =~g, h~.
Theonly
maximalsubgroups
of which contain elements of order 13are up to
conjugation
166
.Hl
contains no elements of 2B andH2
andH4
no elements of4A,
yas the
primitive permutation
characters(see
theAppendix)
show.The character tables of some maximal
subgroups
of Ru and the fusion maps have beencomputed by
S. Mattarei[7].
The class 2B of Ru is the class of involutions which are not third powers of elements of order 6.
H,
containsjust
one such class(2B
inthe notation of the ATLAS
[1],
p.17)
and this is in a coset ofL2(2~),
which does not contain an element of order 4. So H cannot be con-
tained in
Ha,
hence g = G andli (2B, 4A, 13A )
=n (2B, 4A, 13A ) =
1.PROOF OF LEMMA 2. We consider the classes
2A, 5A,
14A ofLy;
the normalized structure constant
n(2A 5A, 1~A)
is2 .
The maxi-mal
subgroups
ofLy
are(up
toconjugation)
The
only
maximalsubgroups,
which contain elements of order 14are
H2
andH4 .
The class 5A(resp. 14A )
ofLy
intersects with~4
in the class 5a
(resp. 14a)
of whereas both involution classes 2a amd 2b of2. An
fuse into the class 2A ofLy.
But the structure constantsn(2a, 5a, 14a)
andn(2b, 5a, 14a)
are both zero.The class 5A
(respectively 14A )
ofI y
intersected withH2 gives
one
conjugacy
class 5a(respectively 14a)
ofH2,
whereas 2A nH2
consists of two classes 2a and
2b,
the latterbeing
the outer involutionclass. One finds
n(2a, 5a, 14a) = 2 and, obviously n(2b, 5a, 14a)
= 0.It follows that the number of
triples (g, h, gh) with g
E5A, gh
E 14A whichgenerate
a propersubgroup
ofLy
is at most(and
in fact
equal Thus,
since the center ofLy
istrivial, Ly
hasone
regular
orbit onf (g7 h) : g E 2A, (g, h)
=Ly}
andli(2A, 5A,14A )
=1.Acknowledgement.
Part of this paper was written whilevisiting
Dr. D. Hunt at the
University
of New SouthWales, Sydney.
Theauthor would like to thank him and hic
colleagues
for their generoushospitality during
the visit.168
170
REFERENCES
[1] J. H. CONWAY - R. T. CURTIS - S. P. NORTON - R. A. PARKER - R. A.
WILSON, An Atlas
of finite
groups, OxfordUniversity
Press (1984).[2] G. HOYDEN-SIEDERSLEBEN - B. H. MATZAT,
Realisierung sporadischer einfacher Gruppen
alsGaloisgruppen
überKreisteilungskörpern,
J.Algebra,
101 (1986), pp. 273-286.
[3] D. C. HUNT, Rational
rigidity
and thesporadic
groups, J.Algebra,
99 (1986), pp. 577-592.[4] B. H. MATZAT,
Realisierung
endlicherGruppen
alsGaloisgruppen,
Manu-scripta
Math., 51 (1985), pp. 253-265.[5] B. H. MATZAT, Zum
Einbettungsproblem
deralgebraischen
Zahlentheorie mit nicht abelschem Kern, Invent. Math., 80 (1985), pp. 365-374.[6] B. H. MATZAT, Konstruktive Galoistheorie, Lecture Notes in Mathematics,
no. 1284, Berlin,
Heidelberg
(1987), 286 pp.[7] S. MATTAREI,
private
communication.[8] J. NEUBÜSER - H. PAHLINGS - W. PLESKEN, CAS;
design
and useof
a systemfor
thehandling of
charactersof finite
groups, in :Computational Group Theory (ed.
M. D.Atkinson),
pp. 195-247, Academic Press, Lon- don, 1984.[9] H. PAHLINGS, Some
sporadic
groups as Galois groups, Rend. Sem. Mat.Univ. Padova, 79 (1988), pp. 97-107.
[10] J. G. THOMPSON, Some
finite
groups which appear asGal(L/K)
whereK~Q(03BCn),
J.Algebra,
89 (1984), pp. 437-499.Manoscritto pervenuto in redazione il 9 settembre 1988.