• Aucun résultat trouvé

Spatio-temporal post-processing of the CFSR daily precipitation across the Great Lakes region (Canada).

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Spatio-temporal post-processing of the CFSR daily precipitation across the Great Lakes region (Canada)."

Copied!
1
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

dikra.khedhaouiria@ete.inrs.ca

Spatio-temporal post-processing of the CFSR daily precipitation across the Great Lakes region (Canada)

Dikra Khedhaouiria1, Alain Mailhot1, Anne-Catherine Favre2

1- Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique - ETE 2 - LTHE - Grenoble (France)

1.Introduction

Precipitation information at the local scale are

needed for many fields, e.g. design of

hydraulic infrastructures.

Reanalysis datasets are an attractive alternative:

the past state of the atmosphere is reconstructed

using Numerical Weather Prediction (NWP)

models assimilating past observations.

Reanalysis datasets cover continuously past period

across the earth with a relatively high temporal

and spatial resolution for several climate

variable as precipitation.

However, reanalysis datasets cannot be directely

used due to, among others, resolution mismatch

and model bias. Therefore, reanalysis needs to be

post-processed before they can be used

.

In this study, precipitation products

are from one reanalysis:

The Climate Forecast System Reanalysis (CFSR)

2.Objectives

Apply stochatistic downscaling approaches combined with meta-Gaussien latent field on CFSR precipitation in order to generate random daily sequences with local properties (as opposed to gridded value) and with

spatio-temporal consistency.

Regionalize the at-site downscaling parameters. As CSFR covers the whole territory, it will be

then possible to generate daily precipitation datasets (not developed here).

3.Data

Hourly datasets aggregated to daily Period: 1979-2009

Resolution: ~ 38 km

Coupled model: Ocean-Atmosphere-Land

331 stations:

Each year: less than 90% missing values Each station cover at least 10

years of the 1979-2009 period

CFSR (Saha et al. 2010)

Observation network

Great Lakes region defined by Plummer et al. (2006)

The stochastic post-treatment is used to correct and downscale CFSR precipitation

Post-processing of reanalysis series is achieved in two steps : one for the precipitation occurrence (LR model) and

one for the precipitation intensity (VGLM model)

Post-processing approach demonstrated high potential for providing precipitation that reproduce at-site statistics,

indices, and the specific annual cycle of the Great-Lake region

The next step is to interpolate (e.g. kriging) the LR and the VGLM

parameters to post-process reanalysis series at sites without historical records

References

7. Conclusion

0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0

Proportion time step

CDD 0.6 0.8 1.0 (b) (a) CDW 0.6 0.8 1.0 (b) (a) Rx1day 0.6 0.8 1.0 (b) (a) 0 20 40 60 80 100 Proportion sites % Rx5day 0.6 0.8 1.0 (b) (a) R95p 0.6 0.8 1.0 (b) (a) 0 20 40 60 80 100

Total wet day precipitation PRCPTOT

0.6 0.8 1.0

(b) (a)

Proportion sites %

Maximum 1-day precipitation Rx1day 0.6 0.8 1.0 (b) (a) 0 20 40 60 80 100 good fair Proportion sites % 0.6 0.8 1.0 (b) (a)

Number of heavy precipitation R10mm 0 20 40 60 80 100 Proportion sites % 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0

Proportion time step

0.6 0.8 1.0

(b) (a)

0 20 40 60 80 100

Cumulative Wet Days CDW

Proportion sites %

4. Method

4.1 Stochastic post-treaments of precipitation ( Wong et al. 2014)

4.3. Daily precipitation at sites

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 Days 0 10 20 30 40 50 Daily Precipitation (mm) Montreal - January Observation quantile 25 quantile 75 Combine the probability of occurrence

and intensity to define the local daily precipitation distribution:

Pr (Z ≤ zi) =pi FΓi, γi; 𝑥𝑖) + (1- pi)

4.1.b. Vector Generalized Linear Model (VGLM) is used

to estimate the precipitation intensity

Daily local gamma distribution conditionnal, where zi is local daily precipitation,

to the simulated intensity xi

μi = μ0 + μ1 log(1+𝑥𝑖)+ μ2 cos(2πd/T) + μ3 sin(2πd/T) γi = γ0 + γ1 log(1+𝑥𝑖)

Pr ( Z ≤ zi | X =xi ) = FΓi, γi; xi)

Daily precipitation distribution is represented by a two-parameter Gamma distribution (μ, γ), [position and shape]

VGLM models allow the daily precipitation parameters at sites to be functions

of daily precipitations estimated by CFSR through the following expression:

μkmare estimated by the maximum-likelihood method

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 Daily Precipitation (mm) 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 P ro b a b ili ty g iv e n a C FS R i n te n si ty Montreal - 10 January 1979

The observed precipitation that day is ~17mm at Montreal Station. The VGLM model estimates, for that day, the probability to observe a precipitation inferior or equal to 17mm is 0.6

4.1.a. Logistic Regression (LR) is used to estimate

local precipitation occurence probabilities

= α0 + α1 log(𝑥𝑖+1) + ...

α2 cos(2πd/T) + α3 sin(2πd/T)

pi

1 - pi

log( )

probability of rain at a given site conditionnal on the intensity estimated by the reanalysis xi for the same day i

LR aims at modelling the pattern of dry and wet days at sites

αk are estimated by

the maximum-likelihood method

10-1 100 101 102

Daily Precipitation at Grid-cell(mm)

0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 P ro b a b ili ty t o o b se rv e a w e t d a y Montreal - January Probability of 0.6 to observe a wet day at Montreal Station when it rains ~2.5mm at the concerned CFSR grid-cell

Transform gaussian field to uniform field

0 1 x 100 -2 0 2 x 100 -2 0 2 x 100

4.2. Random meta-Gaussian latent field definition (Serinaldi et al. 2014)

Fit spatial covariance function of the observed daily precipitation

for each season gaussian field, y(s), at each CFSR Random simulation of the grid-cell coordinates

Append the temporal persistence, ρ, to the random field

(Podgorski & Wegener,2012):

Generate from that distribution with the uniform random field obtained by the meta-gaussian definition

5. Evaluation

Metrics to be evaluated 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 Post-treated or CFSR values 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 Observed values case (1) case (2) case (3) case (4) relative difference 2.5% relative difference 5% post-treated mean 99.7% post-treated interval 90% post-treated interval rd 2.5% 2.5% < rd 5% rd> 5%

Climate evaluation of the daily precipitation Spatial evaluation

Mean, mean on wet days, number of wet days, 95th percentile

Spatial correlation of the the daily precipitation at the pair of sites Annual evaluation

Climate indices from the ETCCDI indices (World Meteorological Organization’s Expert Team on Climate Change Detection

and Indices)

Annual cycle of the precipitation

CASE* framework evaluation

*Comprehensive And Systematic Evaluation

6. Results

The generated series displayed good climate characteristics

(good representation of the marginals: occurrence and intensity) Noticeable improvement compared to CFSR

Climate evaluation of the daily statistics

Annual evaluation

Spatial evaluation

The meta-Gaussian field

enabled the generation accurate spatial correlation even

at the season scale CFSR overestimated the spatial correlations of the daily precipitation

Fraction of annual values displaying a good or fair performance for each sites

Annual cycle of precipitation

Around 30% of sites had 100% of their annual index series in the good category

For the remaining sites, this percentage dropped between 60 to 90% and for the same series, while the remaining years fell in the fair category

Here again, post-processed CFSR showed for the majority of sites and index, better estimates than CFSR

Annual cycles estimated from regionally-averaged daily precipitation

Post-processed series enabled the simulation of the regional annual cycle of the precipitation Good or fair estimates of regional month amounts were generrally obtained in post-processed series

CFSR cycle was not concordant with the observed cycle

The meta-Gaussian latent field can be used to generate spatially consistent precipitation series with adequate temporal persistence

Serinaldi, F., C. G. Kilsby, 2014: Simulating daily rainfall fields over large areas

for collective risk estimation. J. Hydrol., 512, 285–302

Saha S., Moorthi S., et al. (2010). The NCEP Climate Forecast System Reanalysis. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 91(8), 1015-1057.

Wong G., Maraun D., Vrac M.,

Widmann M., Eden J.M., Kent T. (2014). Stochastic model output statistics

for bias correcting and downscaling precipitation including extremes.

Journal of Climate, 27(18), 6940-6959. Bennett, B., M. Thyer, M. Leonard,

M. Lambert, B. Bates, 2017: A

comprehensive and systematic evaluation framework for a parsimonious daily rainfall field model. J. Hydrol.

Plummer, D. A. et al. 2006: Climate and climate change over North America as simulated by the Canadian RCM.

Journal of Climate, 19 (13),

Podgórski, K., Wegener, J. (2012). Velocities of a spatial-temporal stochastic field

with embedded dynamics.

Références

Documents relatifs

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des

On MY18, the cooling system used a diaphragm water pump, which although heavy, reliably provided adequate flowrate for the given pressure drop.. For MY19, the

Results: DJB induced a dramatic decrease in body weight and improvement in glucose control (glucose- and insulin-tolerance) in obese wild type mice fed a high calorie diet, for 25

plots from Taq DNA polymerase stop assay; Energy optimized structure of ligands at HF/6- 31G* level; Time dependent RMSD graphs of c-MYC, c-KIT1 and telomeric (parallel,

Deuxièmement, un grand nombre de non-distracteurs sont sémantiquement plus proches de la réponse que les distracteurs, mais n’ont pas été sélectionnés manuellement car

Excepted for the even ∆J propensity rule, quasi classical calculations are in excellent agreement with close coupling quantum calculations.. As a first application, we present a

The hardware for tle toolkit consists of a PCMCIA data acquisition card, a servo motor controller, servo motors, a stepper motor controller, and stepper