HAL Id: jpa-00220706
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/jpa-00220706
Submitted on 1 Jan 1981
HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.
L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.
TWO DIMENSIONAL ELECTRON LOCALIZATION
M. Pepper
To cite this version:
M. Pepper. TWO DIMENSIONAL ELECTRON LOCALIZATION. Journal de Physique Colloques,
1981, 42 (C4), pp.C4-17-C4-25. �10.1051/jphyscol:1981402�. �jpa-00220706�
TWO D I M E N S I O N A L ELECTRON L O C A L I Z A T I O N M. Pepper*
Cavendish Laboratory, Cambridge, U. K.
Abstract.- This paper gives a s h o r t review o f r e c e n t experimental work on weak l o c a l i z a t i o n i n s i l i c o n i n v e r s i o n l a y e r s . I t i s shown t h a t both t h i s e f f e c t and e f f e c t s a r i s i n g from t h e e l e c t r o n - e l e c t r o n i n t e r a c t i o n a r e present. These mechanisms can be d i s t i n g u i s h e d by t h e i r response t o a magnetic f i e l d , which enables a c o n f i r m a t i o n o f t h e p r i n c i p a l t h e o r e t i c a l p r e d i c t i o n s . The l o c a l i z a t i o n i s c u t o f f by a magnetic f i e l d which leads t o the r e t u r n o f m e t a l l i c conduction, and, i t i s suggested, a minimum m e t a l l i c conductance.
I n t r o d u c t i o n . - Two types o f two dimensional system have been o f use i n l o c a l i z a t i o n studies, these a r e t h i n metal f i l m s ( 1 ) and the i n v e r s i o n , o r accumulation, l a y e r a t a semiconductor surface ( 2 ) . The p r i n c i p a l d i f f e r e n c e between these systems i s t h a t t h e c a r r i e r c o n c e n t r a t i o n i n t h e metals (gated s t r u c t u r e s ) can be a l t e r e d by o n l y a small p r o p o r t i o n . On t h e o t h e r hand t h e semiconductor systems possess a lower c a r r i e r c o n c e n t r a t i o n ( a maximum o f about 2 . 1 0 ~ ~ e - c m - ~ ) b u t t h i s can be decreased c o n t i n u o u s l y t o a n e g l i g i b l y small value.
A considerable amount o f work has been performed on t h e n a t u r e o f l o c a l i z a t i o n i n s i l i c o n i n v e r s i o n l a y e r s (2, 3, 4). The main p o i n t s which have been e s t a b l i s h e d a r e as follo\vs.
1. A m o b i l i t y edge, Ec, separates extended s t a t e s from l o c a l i z e d s t a t e s i n t h e two dimensional band t a i 1. M o d i f i c a t i o n s t o t h e concept o f t h e 2D m o b i l i t y edge w i l l be discussed l a t e r .
2. The temperature dependence o f t h e conductance, a, i s i n agreement w i t h M o t t ' s p r e d i c t i o n t h a t , when s t a t e s o f t h e Fermi energy are l o c a l i z e d , conduction i s by e x c i t a t i o n t o , Ec, passing i n t o v a r i a b l e range hopping ( a = exp
-
( T , / T ) ~ / ~ as t h e temperature i s reduced.3. When t h e Fermi energy, EF, i s a t Ec t h e conductance i s n o t l e s s than
2
0.1 e2/4i, ( 3 . 1 V 5 n-I), t h e minimum m e t a l l i c conductance, although values g r e a t e r than t h i s have been obtained. M e t a l l i c conduction a t values o f a below omi f o r a p a r t i c u l a r specimen are n o t found. T h i s increase i n t h e value o f omin has geen discussed i n terms o f an increase i n the l e n g t h o f t h e p o t e n t i a l f l u c t u a t i o n s ( 2 ) . 4. The l o c a t i o n o f Ec increases as t h e l o c a l i z e d s t a t e s a r e occupied, implying, t h a t , as i n the semiconductor i m p u r i t y band, b o t h d i s o r d e r and t h e e l e c t r o n - e l e c t r o n i n t e r a c t i o n a r e r e s p o n s i b l e f o r t h e l o c a l i z a t i o n .R e c e n t l y , t h e o r e t i c a l arguments have been advanced suggesting t h a t a l l s t a t e s a r e l o c a l i z e d i n t v ~ o dimensions (Abrahams e t a l . (5),Gorkov e t a l . (6),
Houghton e t a l . ( 7 ) , Haydock (8), Kaveh and H o t t ( 9 ) . On these arguments t h e m o b i l i t y edge i s a l o c a l i z a t i o n edge s e p a r a t i n g two d i f f e r e n t types o f l o c a l i z e d s t a t e s . These suggestions, and the experiments which t h e y s t i m u l a t e d , w i l l now
"On leave from Plessey Research, Caswell, Towcester, Northants, U.K.
Article published online by EDP Sciences and available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/jphyscol:1981402
JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE
be discussed.
Weak l o c a l i z a t i o n and i n t e r a c t i o n e f f e c t s i n 2D.
-
Abrahams and co-workers ( 5 ) f i r s t suggested t h a t a l l s t a t e s i n 2D a r e l o c a l i z e d w i t h t h e m o b i l i t y edge being a l o c a l i z a t i o n edae seoaratina s t r o n ~ l v- "
and weaklv l o c a l i z e d s t a t e s . Thev f i n d t h a t the conductance-of a' 2D sysEem i s( t h i s formula was subsequently obtained elsewhere (6, 3 ) ) . oQ i s the normal conduct- ance, ne2r/m, and t h e l o g a r i t h m i c term a r i s e s from t h e l o c a l i z a t i o n . A t zero Kelvin, L i s t h e specimen l e n g t h , b u t a t f i n i t e temperatures L i s t h e i n e l a s t i c d i f f u s i o n l e n g t h ( ~ ~ , $ ) 3 , LIN and L a r e t h e i n e l a s t i c and e l a s t i c mean f r e e paths r e s p e c t i v e l y . The p r e - l o g a r i t h m i c term i s s t r i c t l y v a l i d f o r small changes, a i s a constant pos- sessing values 1 o r
3
deprnding on t h e s t r e n g t h o f s p i n f l i p s c a t t e r i n g . As" v a r i e s as T P / ~ where LTN v a r i e s as TP t h e temperature dependence o f t h e change o f u , 6 0 , i s
60 =
-
const. Ln TKaveh and M o t t have suggested t h a t a t zero K e l v i n t h e l o c a l i z a t i o n edge separates exponential band t a i l s t a t e s from s t a t e s which a r e power law l o c a l i z e d ,
$ % l / r e x p ( i k . r ) . A l t e r n a t i v e forms o f l o c a l i z a t i o n have been proposed by Pichard and SZriiia (10) and Kaydock (8). However, a t f i n i t e temperatures i t i s suggested t h a t t h e power law l o c a l i z a t i o n i s converted i n t o exponential l o c a l i z a - t i o n and here t h e decay l e n g t h i s t h e i n e l a s t i c d i f f u s i o n l e n g t h .
Recently Hodges (11) has explored t h e connection between these quantum treatments and t h e e a r l i e r , c l a s s i c a l , theorem o f Polya (12) t h a t t r u e two dimen- s i o n a l d i f f u s i o n does n o t occur.
Another t h e o r y which p r e d i c t s the same temperature dependence has been pro- posed by A l t s h u l e r , 'ronov and Lee (13) and i s based on t h e t h r e e dimensional work o f A l t s h u l e r and Aronov (14). Here, i n t e r f e r e n c e between e l a s t i c s c a t t e r i n g and t h e e l e c t r o n - e l e c t r o n i n t e r a c t i o n leads t o a s i n g u l a r i t y i n the d e n s i t y o f s t a t e s a t EF. This r e s u l t s i n a c o r r e c t i o n t o t h e conductance given by
Where the f a c t o r F a r i s e s from e l e c t r o n screening and tends t o zero o n l y a t t h e h i g h e s t values o f c a r r i e r concentration, n. F o r low values o f n i t i s approximately given by,
where K i s t h e 2D screening l e n g t h .
Kaveh and M o t t (18) have obtained t h e r e s u l t o f A l t s h u l e r e t a l . by a non- diagrammatic technique. They p o i n t o u t t h a t the two c o r r e c t i o n s should add, t h e l o c a l i z a t i o n a f f e c t i n g the d i f f u s i v i t y and t h e i n t e r a c t i o n a f f e c t i n g t h e d e n s i t y o f s t a t e s . From t h e temperature dependence o f conductance i t i s o n l y p o s s i b l e t o separate t h e l o c a l i z a t i o n and i n t e r a c t i o n mechanisms i f F and t h e i n e l a s t i c s c a t t e r - i n g mechanism a r e known p r e c i s e l y . However, t h e magneto-resistance and Hal 1 e f f e c t o f f e r a more p r e c i s e method o f d i s t i n g u i s h i n g between t h e two (16, 17).
Logarithmic c o r r e c t i o n s , magneto-resistance and H a l l e f f e c t . -
a) Magneto-resi stance
I n t h e presence o f a magnetic f i e l d , B, t h e c y c l o t r o n length, LC, becomes a l e n g t h s c a l e a f f e c t i n g the conductance. The a p p r o p r i a t e c o r r e c t i o n i s
e2 4 e B ~
6 0
C$(3
+ fi/4eB.rI,,D) + L n(-)I.
( 3 )where L D t h e new l e n g t h scale i s given by
This approximation agrees w e l l w i t h equation 3 except when LC >> L where i t f a i l s t o capture t h e B2 dependence o f t h e conductance c o r r e c t i o n .
Thus, as B increases LD becomes s v a l l e r and a negative magneto-resistance i s found. Even i f o t h e r mechanisms dominate t h e temperature dependence o f
resistance, t h e negative magneto-resistance w i l l be found i f t h e o t h e r s c a t t e r i n g processes a r e n o t s e n s i t i v e t o small values o f 6.
Recently i t has been suggested by Lee and Ramakrishnan ( P r i v a t e communication, t o be published) t h a t a magnetic f i e l d a f f e c t s t h e i n t e r a c t i o n mechanism when
ggB >> kT, t h e f a c t o r 2
-
2F being t u r n e d i n t o 2-
F. This increased t h e magnitudeo f t h e l o g a r i t h m i c c o r r e c t i o n p a r t i c u l a r l y a t low values o f n. As t h e l o c a l i z a t i o n i s a f f e c t e d through o r b i t a l motion, t h e n e g a t i v e magneto-resistance w i l l be
dependent on t h e component o f B normal t o t h e plane o f conduction (19). On t h e o t h e r hand, t h e enhancement o f t h e i n t e r a c t i o n c o r r e c t i o n i s a s p i n e f f e c t and so i s o n l y dependent on t h e magnitude o f B, n o t the d i r e c t i o n .
b) H a l l e f f e c t
I n a s i m i l a r manner t h e H a l l constant, R R = uxy/02x) o f f e r s a means o f d i s t i n g u i s h i n g between t h e two regimes. Futuybllka((~0) showea i n t h e l o c a l i z a t i o n case the c o r r e c t i o n i n ox i s t w i c e t h a t of u
,,
thus t h e r e i s no c o r r e c t i o n i n RH. However, A l t s h u l e r e$ a l . (13) suggest t t a t f o r t h e i n t e r a c t i o n regime t h e r e i s no change i n axy o n l y a,,, consequently the change i n RH i s r e l a t e d t o t h e change i n r e s i s t a n c e R byO r , a1 t e r n a t i v e l y , f o r l o c a l i z a t i o n t h e Hal 1 m o b i l i t y , UH, decreases l o g a r i t h m i c a l l y w i t h decreasing temperature, whereas i n t h e i n t e r a c t i o n regime p~ increases w i t h the l o g a r i t h m o f decreasing temperature.
Experimental i n v e s t i g a t i o n s . - The f i r s t observation o f t h e l o g a r i t h m i c c o r r e c t i o n was by Dolan and Osheroff (1) who i n v e s t i g a t e d t r a n s p o r t i n t h i n metal f i l m s . Bishop, Tsui and Dynes (21) showed t h a t t h e c o r r e c t i o n was present i n i n v e r s i o n l a y e r s , t h i s being the e x p l a n a t i o n o f t h e weak temperature dependence i n t h e m e t a l l i c regime present i n e a r l i e r work b u t n o t i n v e s t i g a t e d , i.e. Adkins, P o l l i t t and Pepper (22) F i g u r e 3. As mentioned p r e v i o u s l y , i n t h e absence o f d e f i n i t e knowledge o f t h e i n e l a s t i c s c a t t e r i n g mechanism and t h e value o f F, conductance measurements cannot d i s t i n g u i s h between t h e l o g a l i z a t i o n and i n t e r a c t i o n regimes.
However, i t was shown by Uren, Davies and Pepper (23) t h a t a combination o f measurements as a f u n c t i o n o f e l e c t r i c and magnetic f i e l d s c o u l d d i s t i n g u i s h between t h e mechanisms, and t h a t b o t h were present. T h i s work and t h a t o f these authors w i t h Kaveh w i l l now be discussed.
Anderson e t a l . (24) i n i t i a l l y p o i n t e d o u t t h a t as t h e e l e c t r o n temperature Te v a r i e d w i t h e l e c t r i c f i e l d , F, as Fx, i n f o r m a t i o n on t h e electron-phonon c o u p l i n g can be obtained by a combination o f e l e c t r i c f i e l d and temperature. T h i s t o p i c w i l l n o t be discussed here b u t t h e measurement o f t h e l o g a r i t h m i c c o r r e c t i o n as a f u n c t i o n o f e l e c t r i c f i e l d i s . a v e r y convenient experimental technique. F i g u r e 1 shows t h e l o g a r i t h m i c g r a d i e n t found by Uren, Davies and Pepper as a f u n c t i o n o f m a g n e t i c f i e l d , B. Here t h e g r a d i e n t i s expressed as t h e change o f conductance p e r decade change o f e l e c t r i c f i e l d (due t o two l e n g t h scales being i m p o r t a n t i n t h e presence o f a
JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE
Figure 1. The "Quasi-Loaarithmic" slope i s plotted against maonetic f i e l d ,
B ,(Tesla). The slope i s the r e s i s t a n c e chanoe per decade change i n e l e c t r i c f i e l d with the l a t t i c e a t - 85 mK, L was 19 nm. The c i r c u l a r and square points a r i s e from localization and interactions respectively, from Uren, Davies and P e ~ n e r (23).
magnetic f i e l d (equations
4and
5 )the dependence of
80on e l e c t r i c f i e l d i s
"quasi-logarithmic"). I t i s seen t h a t the gradient i n i t i a l l y decreases
w i t hincreasing B and then increases, f i n a l l y staying f a i r l y constant. The magneto- resistance in the two regimes showed d i f f e r e n t behaviour, being negative when the gradient decreased with
Band positive when i t increased with
B.I t thus appeared t h a t the magnetic f i e l d was distinguishing between the two mechanisms. This i n t e r p r e t a t i o n was enhanced by the f a c t t h a t the second ( i n t e r a c t i o n ) mechanism was l e s s s t a b l e against increasing e l e c t r i c f i e l d , enabling extraction of the gradients f o r the two processes a t a p a r t i c u l a r value of magnetic f i e l d . From analysis of the dependence on electron temperature i t appeared as i f the condition f o r the magnetic f i e l d enhancement of the interaction process was gfiB
> kTe,where g i s the g value and
6i s the Bohr magneton. Uren, Davies and Pepper present r e s u l t s i l l u s t r a t i n g the decreased s t a b i l i t y of the interaction mechanism against an increase i n temperature.
Confirmation t h a t the magnetic f i e l d produced the interaction regime was pro- vided by measurements of the Hall e f f e c t . The r a t i o
BRH/RY =2d9/? was found i n t h e interaction (second) regime, t h i s r e s u l t was obtained by Bishop, Tsui and Dynes, (25) although they did not separate the two mechanisms. The gradual increase in the r a t i o towards
2as ~ F L increases i s shown i n Figure 2. These r e s u l t s on the r o l e of interactions were f o r values of c a r r i e r concentration such t h a t F was
s0.85.
However, the magnitude of t h e pre-logarithmic f a c t o r was considerably greater than
(2-2F) and was consistent with 2-F, in agreement with the recent suggestion of Lee
and Ramakrishnan. Confirmation t h a t t h e magnetic enhancement of the interaction
regime i s a spin e f f e c t , and not related t o o r b i t a l motion, was provided by Davies,
Uren and Pepper
( 2 6 ) .These authors found l i t t l e dependence in the magnitude of the
interaction correction on t h e direction of the magnetic f i e l d .
specimen r e s i s t a n c e i s shown a t t h e top. The c i r c u l a r p o i n t s were taken u s i n g a sample w i t h L = 360 nm, t h e closed c i r c l e s and open c i r c l e s are w i t h e l e c t r o n temperature determined by e l e c t r i c f i e l d and ambient temperature r e s p e c t i v e l y . The crosses were obtained w i t h t h e specimen used f o r F i g u r e 1, from Uren, Davies and Pepper (23).
The work o f Davies e t a l . a l s o showed t h a t i t was p o s s i b l e t o o b t a i n m e t a l l i c behaviour a t 50 mK by completely s e p a r a t i n g t h e i n t e r a c t i o n and l o c a l i z a t i o n c o r r e c - t i o n s . This was achieved by u s i n g specimens w i t h a l o n g e r e l a s t i c mean f r e e p a t h than Uren e t a1
.
The dependence o f r e s i s t a n c e on e l e c t r i c f i e l d f o r v a r i o u s values o f magnetic f i e l d i s i l l u s t r a t e d i n F i g u r e 3. I t i s seen t h a t t h e magnetic f i e l d i n i t i a l l y reduces and then e l i m i n a t e s t h e l o g a r i t h m i c c o r r e c t i o n , and m e t a l l i c behaviour i s found f o r values o f e l e c t r o n temperature down t o 50 mK. ( A t h i g h values o f e l e c t r o n teaoerature, a 1 K, t h e r e s i s t a n c e again increases w i t h i n c r e a s - i n g e l e c t r i c f i e l d . This i s due t o a change i n screening w i t h e l e c t r o n temperature and has no relevance t o t h i s work.) F u r t h e r increase i n B r e s u l t s i n a ~ o s i t i v e magneto-resistance and t h e r e t u r n o f t h e l o g a r i t h m i c c o r r e c t i o n , although here i t i s due t o i n t e r a c t i o n s r a t h e r than l o c a l i z a t i o n . The complete s e p a r a t i o n o f t h emechanisms a r i s e s from t h e increased e l a s t i c mean f r e e path L and a correspondingly enhanced d i f f u s i o n l e n g t h L.
A
s m a l l e r value o f 6 i s r e q u i r e d f o r t h e c y c l o t r o n l e n g t h LC t o become considerably s m a l l e r than L, so causing t h e disappearance o f t h e l o g a r i t h m i c dependence on e l e c t r o n temperature b e f o r e B i s s u f f i c i e n t l y h i g h t o induce the i n t e r a c t i o n mechanism. However, t h e n e g a t i v e r e s i s t a n c e i s s t i l l obtained, t h i s o n l y disappears when LC i s near 1. The g r e a t e r s t a b i l i t y o f t h e l o c a l i z a t i o n mechanism i s apparent as a n e q a t i v e magneto-resistance i s observed when t h e e l e c t r i c f i e l d i s increased s u f f i c i e n t l y t o erase t h e i n t e r a c t i o n c o r r e c t i o n .Another m a n i f e s t a t i o n o f t h e decreased l o c a l i z a t i o n l e n q t h s c a l e i s t h a t , as t h e magnetic f i e l d increases, a h i q h e r v a l u e o f e l e c t r i c f i e l d i s r e q u i r e d t o induce t h e l o g a r i t h m i c behaviour. I n c r e a s i n g B, hence decreasing LC, n e c e s s i t a t e s a s m a l l e r v a l u e o f L, and g r e a t e r v a l u e o f e l e c t r i c f i e l d , f o r t h i s t o determine t h e l e n g t h scale.
Kaveh e t a l . (18) have shown t h a t t h e l o g a r i t h m i c c o r r e c t i o n i s determined by t h e s h o r t e s t l e n g t h a v a i l a b l e , regardless o f i t s o r i g i n . The l e n g t h can be t h e c y c l o t r o n l e n g t h o r the i n e l a s t i c length, depending on t h e values o f magnetic f i e l d and e l e c t r o n temperature as i s shown i n F i g u r e 4.
JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE
F i g u r e 3. Sheet r e s i s t a n c e i s n l o t t e d a o a i n s t t h e l o q a r i t h m o f e l e c t r i c f i e l d L = 360 nm, l a t t i c e temperature = 50 mK, c a r r i e r c o n c e n t r a t i o n = 3.8 x 1011 cW2. The values o f magnetic f i e l d i n Tesla a r e A = 0, B = 0.008, C = 0.021,
D
= 0.047, E = 0.074, F = 0.1,G
= 0.15, H = 0.26,I
= 0.32, 3 = 0.52, from Davies, Uren and Pepper (26).E x t r a c t i o n o f t h e i n e l a s t i c l e n q t h from t h e magneto-resistance has allole~ed in v e s t i - g a t i o n o f t h e temperature dependence o f t h e i n e l a s t i c s c a t t e r i n g r a t e (27, 28). It has been found t h a t t h e T2 law i s m o d i f i e d by t h e e l a s t i c s c a t t e r i n g and a compon- e n t v a r y i n g w i t h a lower power o f temperature i s a l s o present, F i g u r e 5. This i s i n q u a l i t a t i v e agreement w i t h t h e o r e t i c a l c o n s i d e r a t i o n s suqgesting a T component due t o t h e b l u r r i n g o f e l e c t r o n momentum when
~ F L
i s near one.F i n a l l y , v e r y r e c e n t l y Poole, Pepper and Glew (29) have i n v e s t i g a t e d t h e s i t u a t i o n where t h e screening f a c t o r F i s near 0.5, and both i n t e r a c t i o n and l o c a l i - z a t i o n effects are present i n t h e absence o f a magnetic f i e l d . The l o c a l i z a t i o n i s suppressed by t h e a p n l i c a t i o n of a magnetic f i e l d , and w h i l s t t h e r e s i s t a n c e
decreases w i t h B t h e H a l l constant does n o t vary
-
i n accordance w i t h t h e suqgestion of Fukuyama (20). However, when t h e l o c a l i z a t i o n i s suppressed, a l o g a r i t h m i c c o r - r e c t i o n i s s t i l l found as a f u n c t i o n o f temperature. T h i s i s due t o t h e i n t e r a c t i o n mechanism and now t h e H a l l r a t i o o f 2 i s found. These r e s u l t s c o n f i r m t h e sugges- t i o n o f Kaveh and Flott (8, 15) t h a t t h e i n t e r a c t i o n and l o c a l i z a t i o n c o r r e c t i o n s a r e a d d i t i v e .i n e l a s t i c l e n g t h determined by e l e c t r o n h e a t i n q and l a t t i c e h e a t i n g r e s p e c t i v e l y . The dashed l i n e i l l u s t r a t e s t h e r e s u l t s exnected i f t h e l e n g t h was determined by t h e energy change o f t h e e l e c t r o n acquired from t h e f i e l d d u r i n g a d i s t a n c e
1,
a s i t u a t i o n which was n o t achieved; from Kaveh, Uren, Davies and Pepper, (18).Conclusion.- Good agreement now e x i s t s between experiment and t h e p r e d i c t i o n s o f t h e l o c a l i z a t i o n and i n t e r a c t i o n t h e o r i e s . By t h e a p p l i c a t i o n o f a magnetic f i e l d , o r a combination o f magnetic and e l e c t r i c f i e l d s , t h e two mechanisms can be
separated and c l e a r l y d i s t i n g u i s h e d by t h e behaviour o f t h e H a l l e f f e c t and
magneto-resistance. I t i s p o s s i b l e t o o b t a i n m e t a l l i c behaviour a t temoeratures as low as 50
mK,
althouqh i t i s n o t c l e a r i f t h i s s i t u a t i o n i s maintained down t o absolute zero. E v e n t u a l l y kT becomes s m a l l e r than q$R and t h e i n t e r a c t i o n correc- t i o n w i l l become anparent. Holvever, i f t h i s mechanism i s o n l y a ~ e r t u r b a t i o n m e t a l l i c behaviour w i l l be obtained a t 0 K and t h e minimum m e t a l l i c conductance w i l l be observed. The r o l e o f the magnetic f i e l d i n r e s t o r i n g m e t a l l i c c o n d i t i o n w i l l r e s u l t i n a f i e l d induced m e t a l - i n s u l a t o r t r a n s i t i o n .I n t h e presence o f i n t e n s e maanetic f i e l d s these mechanisms w i l l n o t have s i g n i f i c a n c e f o r t h e quantized H a l l r e s i s t a n c e (30), here oxX i s n e g l i g i b l y small and ox i s u n a f f e c t e d by i n t e r a c t i o n s . However, as t h e Fermi energy i s passed throu& t h e Landau l e v e l s a whole s e r i e s o f metal i n s u l a t o r t r a n s i t i o n s w i l l be obtained. As described i n e a r l i e r work (31) t h e c y c l o t r o n o r b i t w i l l d e l o c a l i z e e l e c t r o n s when t h e l e n g t h scale o f t h e p o t e n t i a l f l u c t u a t i o n s i s long.
Acknowledgements.- The work reviewed here was performed i n c o l l a b o r a t i o n w i t h W.A. Davies, M. Kaveh, D.A. Poole and M.J. Uren and w i l l be f u l l y described
elsewhere. Throughout t h i s work we have enjoyed many discussions w i t h
Professor S i r Nevi11 Mott. T h i s work was supported by t h e Science Research Council and, i n p a r t , by t h e European Research O f f i c e o f t h e U.S. Army.
References
1. DOLAN, D.J., OSHEROFF,
B.D.,
Phys. 9ev. L e t t . 43 (1979) 721.2. MOTT, N.F., PEPPER, M., PQLLITT, S., WALLIS,
RT.,
ADYINS,C.J.,
P ~ o c . 9.Soc. A345 (1975) 169.
3. PEPPER, K P r o c . 9 . Soc. A353 (1977) 225.
4. HATTSTEIN, A., FOULER, A . B . 7 u r f a c e Science 73 (1978) 19.
-
JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE
F i g u r e 5. (+,,T)-l i s p l o t t e d a g a i n s t T, T i s t h e e l e c t r o n - e l e c t r o n s c a t t e r i n g time and T i s t h e temperature. ?fie presence o f a component v a r y i n g a t a lower power than 2 i s s i g n i f i e d , from Uren, Davies Kaveh and Pepper (22).
ABRAHAMS, E., ANDERSON, P.M., LICCIARDELLO, D.C., RAMKRISHNAN, T.V., Phys. Rev. L e t t . 42 (1979) 673.
GORKOV, L.P., LARKINFA.H., KHMELNITZKII, El., J.E.T.P. L e t t . 30 (1979) 299.
HOUGHTON, A., JERICKI, A., KENWAY, R.D., PRIJISKEN, A.M.M., PhE. Rev. L e t t . 45 (1980) 394.
HAmCK, T.V., P h i l . rlag. B43 (1981 ) 203.
KAVEH, M., MOTT, N.F., J. P F s . C14 (1981) L177.
PICHARD, J.L., SARMA, G . , J. P h y s T C E (1381) L127 a l s o J. Phys. C. i n t h e press.
HODGES, C.H., J. Phys. C14 (1980) L247.
POLYA, G., Math. Ann. 8 4 7 9 2 1 ) 149.
ALTSHULER, B.L., ARONOV; A.G., LEE, P.A., Phys. Rev. L e t t . 44 (1980) 1288.
ALTSHIJLER, B.L., AROFIOV, A.G., Sol i d S t a t e Comn. 30 (1979) n5. KAVEH, H., FlOTT, N.F., J. Phys. C14 (1981) L183.
-
ALTSHULER, B.L., KHMELNITZKII, D.,ARKIN, A.I., LEE, P.A., Phys. Rev. B g (1980) 5142.
.
HIKAMI, S., LARKIN, A.I., NAGAOKA, Y., Prog. Theor. Phys. 63 (1380) 707.
KAVEH, H., UREN, M.J., DAVIES, R.A., PEPPER, tl., J. Phys. m 4
-
(1981) 413.BISHOP, D.J., TSUI, D.C., DYNES, RX., Phys. Rev. L e t t . 44 (1980) 1153.
ADKINS, C.J., POLLITT, S., PEPPER, M., J. Physique 37 C 4 7 9 7 6 ) 343.
UREN, M.J., DAVIES, R.A., PEPPER, M., J. Phys. C13 7J980) 1985.
ANDERSON, P.W., ABRAHAMS, E., RAMAKRISHNAN, T . V . 7 h y s . Rev. L e t t . 44 (1979) 1288.
BISHUP, D.J., TSUI, D.C., DYNES, R.C., Phys. Rev. L e t t .
46
(1981) 360.DAVIES, R.A., UREN, M.J., PEPPER, M., J. Phys. C. i n t h e press.
UREN, M.J., DAVIES, R.A., KAVEH, M., Pepper, M., J. Phys. C14 (1981) L395.
KAWAGUCHI, Y., KAWAJI, S., J. Phys. Soc. Japan 48 (1980) 6 9 K POOLE, D.A., PEPPER, M., GLEW, R.J., J. Phys. C F t o be published.
von KLITZING, K., DORDA, G., PEPPER, M., Phys. Rev. L e t t .
-
45 (1980) 494.PEPPER, M., P h i l . Mag. B z (1978) 83.