HAL Id: hal-00894212
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00894212
Submitted on 1 Jan 1998
HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of
sci-entific research documents, whether they are
pub-lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.
L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.
Reciprocal X;1 translocation in a calf
B. Mayr, H. Korb, S. Kiendler, G. Brem
To cite this version:
Note
Reciprocal X;1
translocation in
a
calf
B.
Mayr
H.
Korb
S. Kiendler
a
G.
Brem
a
Institute for Animal
Breeding
andGenetics, Veterinary University,
Veterinarplatz
1, 1210Vienna,
Austriab
Ludwig
Boltzmann Institute for Immuno-,Cyto-
andMoleculargenetic Research,
Veterinary University, Veterinarplatz
1, 1210 Vienna, Austria(Received
28 November1997; accepted
26February
1998)
Abstract - A
reciprocal
translocation60,XX,t(X;1)(42;13)
was detected in a2-month-old chimeric calf. A
study
of the parents of the calfstrongly suggested
the ’de novo’origin
of the aberration.©
Inra/Elsevier,
Pariscattle
/
reciprocal translocation/
X-autosomal/
cytogeneticsRésumé - Une translocation réciproque
60,XX,t(X;1)(42;13)
sur un veau. Unetranslocation
réciproque
d’un veauchimérique
de 2 mois a été détectée. L’examen deses parents fait penser à
l’origine
de novo de l’aberration.©
Inra/Elsevier,
Parisbovin
/ translocation réciproque
/ X-autosomale
/ cytogénétique
1. INTRODUCTION
Despite
thehigh
economicimportance
of cattle in farm animalbreeding,
very few data are available on
reciprocal
translocations in thisspecies.
Knowninterautosomal
reciprocal
exchanges
are60,XY,t(10;11)(41;14)
in a bullshow-ing
a 60-90days
non-return rate of 30%
[11,
12], 60,XY,t(2q-;20q),t(8q-;27q)
in an infertile bull
[15]
and60,XY,t(8;15)(21;24)
in a bull with a 60-90days
non-return rate of 25
%
[13].
Further cases were
60,XY,t(1;8;9)(q43;q13;q26)
with a reduction in60-90
days
non-return of36.4 %
[8], 60,XY,t(20;24)(q17;q25)
with a reduc-tion of 60-90days
non-return of 17%
[16]
and60,XY,t(8;13)(qll;q24)
in asterile bull
[1].
In addition to these interautosomal
reciprocal translocations,
there are also a few known cases of X-autosome translocations[2,
3,
5,
6, 9,
14].
Now we have detected a further
reciprocal
translocation of the X-autosometype
in cattle. *2. MATERIALS AND METHODS
The 50 chimeric twins examined
cytogenetically
were all female chimerasof the Fleckvieh
(Simmental)
breed; they
were 1-10 months old.Peripheral
blood was withdrawn from thejugular
vein andlymphocytes
were isolatedby
the method describedby
Lin et al.!lOJ.
The chromosomes were G-bandedby
thetrypsin technique
ofWang
and Fedoroff[17].
G-bandedpreparations
were
karyotyped
according
to theReading
Conference recommendations!4J.
The nomenclature ofbanding
patterns
wasadopted
from ISCNDA 1989[7]
forschematic
representation.
3. RESULTS
A 2-month-old female chimera was found to possess 98
%
female and 2%
male cells in a total of 200 screened cells. All of the 196 female cells were dis-covered to be
heterozygous
for thereciprocal
translocation60,XX,t(X;1)(42;13)
shown infigure
1. Incontrast,
the translocation was absent in the four XY cells. The translocation was balanced and the calf washealthy
andappeared
pheno-typically
normal at this age. We had no furtherdata,
i.e. later or section dataregarding
freemartinism.While no blood
sample
from the male chimeric twin was available forcytogenetic investigation,
samples
of bothparents
of the female translocation carrier wereinvestigated.
Both of theparents
presented
normalkaryotypes,
i.e.they
were free of any translocation in all the 150 blood cellsinvestigated.
Therefore,
a ’de novo’origin
of the translocation was obvious.4. DISCUSSION
The chimeric nature of our
investigated
female makes any conclusionsregarding
effects of theX;1-translocation
onfertility impossible. However,
itis
justified
toexpect
higher fertility depression
from areciprocal
translocation ascompared
to theusually
mild effects of Robertsonian translocations in cattle. Because of the lack of the translocation in any cell of eitherparents,
a ’denovo’
origin
of therearrangement
must be assumed. The mutational eventprobably
occurred in thegametogenesis
in theparental
testis/ovary,
orearly
in theembryogenesis
of the calf. It isimpossible
todefinitely
differentiate between thesepossibilities,
because nocytogenetic
studies wereperformed
inthe
parental gonads. Furthermore,
the absence of anykaryotypically
normal XX cells makes a ’de novo’origin
in lateembryonic
or fetaldevelopment
ratherimprobable.
It may be
expected
that over the next few years newmethods,
such as chromosomepainting,
willspeed
up the detection of furtherreciprocal
REFERENCES
[1]
AnsariH.A., Jung H.R., Hediger R.,
FriesR., K6nig H., Stranzinger G.,
A balanced autosomalreciprocal
translocation in anazoospermic bull, Cytogenet.
Cell Genet. 62(1993)
117-123.[2]
BasrurP.K., Popescu C.P.,
PinheiroL.E.L., Berepubo N.A., Reyes E.R.,
Non-random pattern of X-chromosome inactivation in X-autosome translocation carriercows, 16th Int.
Congr. Genet., Toronto,
20-27August
1988, Genome 30(suppl.)
(1988)
1,
31.[3]
Eldridge F.E.,
X-autosomal translocation incattle,
in: Proc. 4th Eur. Coll.Cytogenet.
Domest.Anim., Uppsala,
9-12 June 1980, pp. 23-30.[4]
FordC.E.,
Pollock D.L., Gustavsson I., Proc. 1st Int. Conf. for theStandardisa-tion of Banded
Karyotypes
of DomesticAnimals, Reading,
2-6August 1976,
Hereditas92
(1980)
145-162.[5]
Gallagher
D.S. Jr, BasrurP.K.,
WomackJ.E.,
Identification of an autosome toX chromosome translocation in the domestic cow, J.
Heredity
83(1992)
451-453.[6]
GustavssonI.,
FraccaroM., Tiepolo L.,
LindstenJ., Presumptive
X-autosome translocation in a cow: Preferential inactivation of the normalX-chromosome,
Nature 218(1968)
183-184.[7]
ISCNDA,
International system forcytogenetic
nomenclature of domestican-imals,
in: Di BerardinoD., Hayes H.,
FriesR., Long
S.(Eds.),
2nd Int. Conf. onStandardization of Domestic Animal
Karyotypes, Jouy-en-Josas,
22-26May
1989,Cytogenet.
Cell Genet. 53(1990)
65-79.[8]
KovdcsA., Villag6mez D.A.F.,
GustavssonI.,
LindbladK.,
FooteR.H.,
HowardT.H., Synaptonemal complex analysis
of athree-breakpoint
translocationin a subfertile
bull,
Cytogenet.
Cell Genet. 61(1992)
195-201.[9]
Koykul W.,
Basrur P.K.,Synaptic
behaviour and itsimpact
onfertility
in anX-autosome translocation carrier
bull,
in: Proc. 11th Eur. Coll.Cytogenet.
Domest.Anim., Frederiksberg,
2-5August
1994, pp. 76-81.[10]
LinC.C.,
NewtonD.R.,
SminkN.K.,
ChurchR.B.,
Arapid
andsimple
method for the isolation and culture ofleucocytes
for chromosomeanalysis
in domesticanimals,
Can. J. Anim. Sci. 56(1976)
27-31.[11]
Mayr
B., Themessel H., W6ckl F.,Schleger W., Reziproke
Translokation60,XY,t(10;11)(41;14)
beimRind,
Z. Tierzucht.Zuchtgsbiol.
96(1979)
44-47.[12]
Mayr B., Untersuchungen zytogenetischer
Marker und ihrer Andwendbarkeitin der
Zuchtpraxis
bei Rind undSchwein,
Habilthesis,
Vet. Univ.Vienna, 1979,
pp.32-35.