• Aucun résultat trouvé

1.1 Summary of the evolution of single low- and intermediate-mass stars . . . 3

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "1.1 Summary of the evolution of single low- and intermediate-mass stars . . . 3"

Copied!
4
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Contents

1 Introduction 3

1.1 Summary of the evolution of single low- and intermediate-mass stars . . . 3

1.1.1 Pre-main sequence and main sequence . . . . 3

1.1.2 Evolution to the AGB: red giant branch and first dredge-up . . . . 5

1.2 The Asymptotic Giant Branch (AGB) . . . . 6

1.2.1 Early-AGB (E-AGB) . . . . 6

1.2.2 TP-AGB: The origin of thermal pulses . . . . 7

1.2.3 The third dredge-up (TDU) . . . . 8

1.2.4 s-process nucleosynthesis . . . . 11

1.2.5 Challenges in understanding AGB nucleosynthesis . . . . 17

1.2.6 Observational characteristics of AGB stars . . . . 21

1.2.7 Termination of the AGB phase . . . . 22

1.3 Evolution beyond the AGB: post-AGB, planetary nebulae and white dwarf 22 1.4 Binary evolution of low- and intermediate-mass stars . . . . 23

1.4.1 Binary interaction mechanisms . . . . 24

1.4.2 The zoo of chemically-peculiar objects . . . . 25

1.5 S-type stars . . . . 27

1.5.1 Summary of the evolution from M-type stars to carbon stars: Im- portance of S-type stars . . . . 27

1.5.2 General introduction to S stars . . . . 29

1.5.3 Tc dichotomy . . . . 30

1.5.4 Intrinsic and extrinsic S stars . . . . 30

1.5.5 Different methods to distinguish intrinsic and extrinsic S stars . . 31

1.5.6 Atmospheric parameters and abundances of S stars . . . . 33

1.5.7 S stars: Unsolved issues and challenges . . . . 34

1.6 Motivation and Outline . . . . 35

(2)

ii Contents

2 Stellar parameter and abundance determinations of S stars 37

2.1 Challenges in determining the parameters of S stars . . . . 37

2.2 Grid of MARCS model atmospheres of S stars . . . . 38

2.3 S4U: S StarS SED Fitting Utility . . . . 40

2.3.1 Introduction to the tool . . . . 40

2.3.2 Method . . . . 41

2.3.3 Discussion . . . . 41

2.3.4 Conclusion . . . . 42

2.4 Atmospheric parameters derived from spectral fitting . . . . 46

2.4.1 Limitations of the spectral fitting routine . . . . 48

2.5 Constraining log g with Gaia DR2 parallaxes . . . . 48

2.6 Abundance determination . . . . 50

2.7 Deriving abundances of S stars: General description . . . . 51

2.7.1 C, N, O . . . . 51

2.7.2 Carbon isotopic ratios . . . . 52

2.7.3 Metallicity . . . . 53

2.7.4 Heavy elements . . . . 53

3 S stars and s-process in the Gaia era 55 3.1 Introduction . . . . 56

3.2 Observations and target selection . . . . 61

3.2.1 S stars from the Gaia catalogues . . . . 61

3.2.2 High-resolution spectra . . . . 64

3.2.3 Classification based on Tc lines . . . . 64

3.3 Atmospheric parameter determination . . . . 67

3.3.1 Uncertainties on the atmospheric parameters . . . . 67

3.4 Abundance determination . . . . 71

3.4.1 C, N, O . . . . 71

3.4.2 Metallicity [Fe/H] . . . . 74

3.4.3 s-process elements . . . . 74

3.4.4 Uncertainties on the abundances . . . . 76

3.4.5 Abundance profiles of the three intrinsic S stars NQ Pup, UY Cen, and V915 Aql . . . . 79

3.5 Comparison of abundances with nucleosynthesis predictions . . . . 82

3.5.1 Stellar models and nucleosynthesis calculations . . . . 82

3.5.2 The s-process abundance distribution . . . . 82

3.5.3 Comparison between the modelled and measured carbon and s-

process enrichments . . . . 86

(3)

Contents iii

3.5.4 The Zr – Nb pair . . . . 87

3.6 The HR diagram of S stars . . . . 87

3.7 Infrared excess of the intrinsic S stars . . . . 89

3.8 Conclusions . . . . 89

4 Occurrence of third dredge-up in low-mass S stars 99 4.1 Introduction . . . 100

4.2 Observations . . . 103

4.3 Technetium detection . . . 103

4.4 Stellar parameter determination . . . 105

4.5 Abundance determination and uncertainties . . . 107

4.6 Comparison with STAREVOL nucleosynthesis predictions . . . 112

4.7 Robustness of the derived stellar masses . . . 116

4.7.1 Sensitivity to the adopted atmospheric-parameter set . . . 116

4.7.2 Sensitivity to the RGB mass-loss rate . . . 116

4.8 Conclusion . . . 116

5 Constraining the luminosity of the TDU via Tc-rich S stars 119 5.1 Introduction . . . 120

5.2 Observational sample . . . 121

5.3 Confirmation of Tc-rich nature . . . 124

5.4 Stellar parameter determination . . . 124

5.5 Abundance determination . . . 129

5.5.1 C, N, O . . . 129

5.5.2 [Fe/H] . . . 129

5.5.3 Light s-process elements (Sr, Y, Zr, Nb) . . . 129

5.5.4 Heavy s-process elements (Ba, Ce, Nd) . . . 131

5.5.5 Other heavy elements (Pr, Sm, Eu) . . . 131

5.5.6 Uncertainties on the abundances . . . 131

5.6 HR diagram of Tc-rich S stars . . . 141

5.6.1 Mass and metallicity distribution of intrinsic and extrinsic S stars 144 5.7 Discussion on the abundances . . . 144

5.7.1 [C/Fe] vs total [s/Fe] . . . 144

5.7.2 [hs/ls] vs [Fe/H] . . . 147

5.7.3 Comparison with STAREVOL predictions . . . 148

5.7.4 o

1

Ori and BD+79 156: The ‘trinsic’ S stars . . . 149

5.8 Conclusions . . . 150

(4)

iv Contents

6 Conclusions and future prospects 157

6.1 Summary and conclusions . . . 157

6.2 Future prospects . . . 159

6.2.1 HR diagram of Tc-rich M-type stars . . . 159

6.2.2 Tc and Nb of intrinsic S stars as chronometer . . . 162

6.2.3 Analysis of intrinsic S stars in the near-infrared (NIR) regime . . 162

6.2.4 Expansion of the S stars sample with Gaia Data Release 3 . . . . 162

6.2.5 Investigating the low-luminosity carbon stars . . . 163

A Annex 165 A.1 [s/Fe] in the MARCS grid . . . 165

A.2 Atomic Linelists . . . 165

Bibliography 173

Références

Documents relatifs

10 ( ﺎﻤ ﺭﻴﺒﻌﺘﻟﺍ ﺔﺼﺤ ﺀﺎﻨﺜﺃ ﺫﻴﻤﻼﺘﻟﺍ ﺎﻬﻴﻓ ﻊﻘﻴ ﻲﺘﻟﺍ ﺀﺎﻁﺨﻷﺍ ﻲﻫ ﻲﺒﺎﺘﻜﻟﺍ ﻭﺃ ﻱﻭﻔﺸﻟﺍ ؟.. ﻲﻧﺎﺜﻟا ﻞﺼﻔﻟا : ﺔﯿﻧاﺪﯿﻣ ﺔﺳارد 95 ﺞﺌﺎﺘﻨﻟﺍ لﻴﻠﺤﺘ : ﺀﺎﻨﺜﺃ ﺫﻴﻤﻼﺘﻟﺍ

L’accès à ce site Web et l’utilisation de son contenu sont assujettis aux conditions présentées dans le site LISEZ CES CONDITIONS ATTENTIVEMENT AVANT D’UTILISER CE SITE WEB.

Regarding our modelling results, early crustal growth models predict ridgecrests significantly less shallow than progressive crustal growth models because a larger continental

Note: “Closing” is defined as a positive closure rate horizontally and a positive relative

La présente étude expérimentale et de modélisation a été menée pour comprendre le comportement acoustique du terre-chanvre, et le comparer à celui du chaux-chanvre.. Elle a

J’ai perdu dans tes yeux Mon reflet embelli Ton regard lumineux N’éclaire plus ma vie Tous nos instants heureux.. À jamais,

Results For enamel, the highest shear bond strength values were obtained applying routine bonding procedures (23.5± 5.6 MPa for etch-and-rinse and 26.0±6.0 MPa for

De la combinaison de ces deux facteurs conjoncturels – le rééquilibrage des lignes de production et la mise en conformité avec la nouvelle loi sur le travail tem- poraire – naît