HAL Id: jpa-00246495
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/jpa-00246495
Submitted on 1 Jan 1992
HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.
L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.
Numerical simulation of random composite dielectrics
S. Stölzle, A. Enders, G. Nimtz
To cite this version:
S. Stölzle, A. Enders, G. Nimtz. Numerical simulation of random composite dielectrics. Journal de
Physique I, EDP Sciences, 1992, 2 (4), pp.401-408. �10.1051/jp1:1992153�. �jpa-00246495�
J. Phys, I France 2
(1992)
401-408 APRIL 1992, PAGE 401Classification Physics Abstracts
02.60 77.20 77.40
Numerical simulation of random composite dielectrics
S.
St61zle,
A. Enders and G. NimtzII. Physikalisches Institut der Universitit zu K61n, 5000 K61n 41, Germany
(RecHved
18 December 1991, accepted 24 December1991)
Abstract. A novel computer simulation method is presented for the non-dissipative dielec- tric response of binary mixtures. It is based on the discretization of Maxwell's equations and thus takes into account aII classical
long-range
interactions between different particles implicitly.The simulations performed yield a relationship between the dielectric functions of the two
com-
ponents, the volume fraction and the dielectric function of the mixture, which can be described
by an exponential formula. It was found that the exponent in this formula depends on the volume fraction but not on the dielectric properties of each component. The mixture rule is in agreement with experimental data taken from literature.
I. Introduction.
A mixture of
electrc-magnetically
diTerent materials which shows amacroscopically
horno- geneousbehaviour,
is called "ETective Medium". For more than a century scientists andengineers
have beentrying
to describe the effective dielectric response of such acomposite material,
for an overview seeill.
Several theoreticalapproaches
have beendeveloped
into formulascharacterizing
therelationship
between thecomplex
dielectric functions(DF)
of the two components £, Em, therespective
volumefilling
factor(or:
volumefraction) f
and theresulting
effective DF ? of the mixture.However,
there are manyapproximations
necessaryin the
analyticaI deveIopment, concerning
the innertopology
of the structures as well assize, shape,
DF and volume fraction of theparticles.
As a consequence none of the formulas can be used to describe allpossible experimental
data.They
are all limited to smallfilling
factorsf
<0,I) and/or
toonly
small differences between the DF'S of the components. Thisproblem
even occurs in the
simple
case ofwater-in-oil-microemulsions,
asreported
in [2, 3]. In thispaper we
investigate non-dissipative
dielectric mixturesby
computer simulations and compare the results with those obtainedby
thefollowing
formulas:. Maxwell-Garnett [4]
? + 2£r~
~
2£ + Em
402 JOURNAL DE PfIYSIQUE I N°4
o B6ttcher [5]
~ ~£
+ 2£m.
Bruggeman
[6]'-f= ~l-~~l~i)~
o
Looyenga iii
it
=
f£I
+(I f)£I
o Lichtenecker [8]
In?=
fln£+(I- f)In£m
with Em
being
the DF of the matrix material in whichparticles
with a bulk DF of £ arerandomly
distributed.2. The method.
For the computer simulations we discretized the
3D-space
inside an idealrectangular cavity
resonator
using
a cubicgrid
G and a secondgrid
G*displaced
from Gby
half thelength
A of eachgrid
cell in z-, y- and z-direction. The size was chosen as: 20 mm x 20 mm x 10 mm.On the
edges
between the nodes ofG,
we define the electric field vectors andon the
edges
of G* themagnetic
field vectors.Every
mesh cell of G may be filled witha diTerent
material,
I.e.material with diTerent
permittivity
£ or Em andpermeability
/t or /tm.By
thissetting
~ve cantransform Maxwell's
equations
into a set of matrixequations using
a finite diTerence method(finite integration theory
[9]).
By the
help
of linearapproximation
techniques for the numerical treatment ofintegrals,
rot E
= -B
rot H = D
(I)
D = ££oE
B =
/t/toH
are transformed to:
C .e = -iw.b
C* h
= iw.d
(2)
D~ e = d
D~ h = b
where
D~
and D~ arediagonal
matricescontaining permittivities
andpermeabilities
inside the diTerent cells of thegrid (as
in this workonly
materials with /t = I are studied,D~
~vill beN°4 NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF RANDOM COMPOSITE DIELECTRICS 403
represented by
a factor I in theequations).
C and C* represent the discrete rot-operators [9]and
e,d,h,b
are the discrete vectorscontaining
therespective
fieldstrength
ofE,
D, H and B.Reducing
the two sets ofequations
to one we eliminate themagnetic
field. The result isone
single eigenvalue equation
for the electric field distribution:C* C e =
A~£o
iLow~Dee (3)
This discretization
approach
has theadvantage
thatcontinuity
conditions for the fields areimplicitly
fulfilled. Electric fields are nevercomputed perpendicular
to surfaces between dif- ferent materials andmagnetic
flux densities are never definedparallel
to these surfaces. Thismeans that
only
the continuous components of theelectromagnetic
fields arecalculated,
anatural property, which
always
demands some effort ifone uses finite element methods instead of finite differences.If the resonator is now filled
only
with loss free materials(£ real,
differentpermittivities, however)
theeigenvalue equation
is real andsymmetric (3
x Nequations
for Nnodes).
The effective
permittivity
of the mixture is then calculated from the lowest resonance fre-quencies
of the empty(wo)
and the filled(w)
resonator:~2
0
~ ~2
First we used code E of the MAFIA [9] = MAxwell's
equations
FiniteIntegration Algorithm) software,
which has beendeveloped
for thecomputation
ofeigensolutions
of such systemsby
Householder-tranformation. But the MAFIA software
package only
accepts loss free materials up to now andwe found numerical accuracy to become
inacceptably
poor for suchheteroge-
neous systems as studied here with
filling
factorf
> 0.3.So a new computer code COSME [10] =
Complex
Solution of Maxwell'sEquations)
wasdeveloped
which finds the exacteigenvalue
andeigenvector belonging
to any resonator modeusing
aconjugate gradient
methodtogether
with inverse iteration.Consider She
general eigenvalue equation:
A~ =
qDz
First, by
aspectral
shift[11],
theequation
is modified to have noeigensolutions
with zeroas an
eigenvalue.
(A
noD)z
= q* D ~(4)
If no is chosen very close to the
eigenvalue
q which isactually
to bedetermined,
q*= q no
results to be the smallest
eigenvalue
of the newproblem (Eq. 4).
Then I/q*
is found to be thelargest eigenvalue
to the inverse matrix(A qoD)~~D
which is
easily
foundby
astraight
forward Mises-iteration[11].
In the case that the inversion of this matrix is notpossible
as a cause of thehigh
order of theproblem,
inverse iteration is404 JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE I N°4
employed:
(A
qo D ~n+i " Dzn~n+1 ~ ~n
In each iteration step the above
equation
is solvedusing
aconjugate gradient algorithm
and~n converges towards the
eigenvector belonging
to q* and at the same time to q, theeigenvalue
of the
original problem (3).
In this case, the matrix A is identical with C* C and the matrix D with D~.
We obtain the effective
permittivity dividing
theeigenvalue
of the empty resonatorby
q:~ no
This new computer program COSME will also enable us to
investigate lossy
media in thenear future. Materials
showing dissipation
makeequation (3) complex
with asymmetric
but non-hermitian matrix.3. Itesults.
All the mixtures we
investigated
wereparticles
in air(or vacuum).
It can beproved
mathe-matically
that systems with a matrix ofhigher permittivity
show the samebehaviour,
becausenormalizing
allpermittivities
to the matrixpermittivity
does notchange
theeigenvalue prob-
lem at all.
We studied mixtures
containing particles
withpermittivities
up to £ = 60. There is asimple
reason for
choosing
this limit: the first simulations were carried out on an IBM 3084 computerwhose main memory allowed
only
40 x 10 x 40 nodes on thegrid.
Asparticle
size cannot be smaller than one unitlength
A of a meshcell,
the smallestparticles
we simulated had alength
d of 0.5 mm.
On the other hand it is obvious that
quasi-homogeneous properties
of a mixture canonly
be observed if theinhomogenities
are much smaller than thewavelength
I used for spectroscopy.We chose the rule
~
$
~ ~~to reduce the unwanted influence of
scattering
and reflection of the wavesby
theparticles.
The
corresponding problem
of the simulations is thequestion:
how does the number of nodes in the mesh aiect thequality
of the obtainedresults,
I-e- can we be sure ofgetting
rid offinite size effects
using
asufficiently
fine mesh? Wecompared
a very coarse mesh(10
x 4 x 10nodes) successively
with meshes ofincreasing
fineness: 20 x 16 x20,
40 x 30 x40,
60 x 20 x 60, 60 x 40 x 60. The latter sizes have becomecomputable
because of the new vector computer in the Rechenzentrum at theUniversity
ofCologne,
the NECSX3,
which allowslarger
systemsto be calculated
using
the program COSME. Above a mesh size of 40 x 30 x 40 the values did notchange considerably
any more. To save computer time ingeneral
all our models werediscretized
using
that same mesh size.With the MAFIA programs we were able to compute the effective
permittivities
of heterostruc-tures with a volume
filling
factor up tof
= 0.3. Above that value accuracy was too poor toallow a reasonable
interpretation
of the data.N°4 NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF RANDOM COMPOSITE DIELECTRICS 405
3.5 ~
£ E
7
3 o f o-I
f 0 2
6
2.5
2.0 4
3 1.5
2
1.0
o.5 o
-10 0 lo 20 30 40 50 60 70 -lo 0 lo 20 30 40 50 60 70
E E
a) b)
14
I
12
f = 0.3
io
8
6
4
z
0
-lo 0 lo 20 30 40 50 60 70
E
c)
Fig-I-
Computer simulation data(o)
in comparison to Maxwell- Garnett's(i?),
Looyenga's(o),
Bruggeman's(m)
B6ttcher's(b)
and Lichtenecker's(D)
formulas, I is plotted vs, e, em = i at aconstant volume Itaction,
a)
volume fraction f= 0.i,
b)
volume fraction f = 0.2,c)
volume fraction f = 0.3.First we
compared
the data(I,e.: ?(
£,f
with several of the effective medium formulas(Fig.
I). Obviously
the results calculated with the formulas differ from each other and none of the formulasreproduces
the values obtainedby
the simulation.As
Looyenga's
formula [7]ri/3
=
j £1/3
+(1 f) £)3
is
clearly
the one thatgives
closest results to the numericaldata,
we chose thegeneralized
mixture formula
T #
f
£~ +(l f)
ESto fit the data
varying
the exponent a(0
< a <I). Actually
for many differenttripletts
of valuesf,
£,?)
the exponents were foundusing
Newton's method. Anexample
result of thisprocedure
406 JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE I N°4
o.9
a
Da
f=0 3
07
t=o z
06
t=o 05
0 4
20 30 40 50 60
E
Fig.2.
I°= f. e° +
(I f)
e$ is used to fit the data tripletts f, e,I),
in this case from MAFIA simulations. The resulting values for the exponent a are plotted vs. e. em= I + I * 0.
0.8
a °
~~ .
a
o.6
o
o.5 °
o
DA
o '
o.3 ~
0.2
O-O O-1 02 03 04
f
Fig.3.
Exponent a vs. volume &action f, MAFIA(o),
COSME (o)is shown in
figure
2. We obtained the same exponent a out of different computerexperiments provided
that therespective filling
factors were identical. On the otherhand,
there wasno
significant dependence
on the value of thepermittivity
of theparticles.
This behavjouralight
reflect the interaction between theparticles becoming
stronger withincreasing
number ofparticles
per unitvolume,
I-e- withincreasing filling
factor.Figure
Ialready
shows that the relative diTerence between the simulated results and the values obtained fromanalytical
formulas increase with
increasing
volume fraction.Obviously
all the formulas do not take into account themany-particle
interaction. Infigure
3 the calculated exponent a isplotted
us. the volume fraction. Whereas at volume fractions below 0.25 an almoststrictly
linear behaviour isobserved,
above 0.25 the linear correlation between a andf
is abandoned.If a
Looyenga-like
formula isapplied
to describe therelationship
between thepermittivities
of matrix andparticles,
the volume fraction and theresulting
eTectivepermittivity
of an eTectiveN°4 NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF RANDOM COMPOSITE DIELECTRICS 407
2.5 O-o
E'
. ,,
E
,
o o
o ,
2.0
.
°
i.5
lo
01 0.2
f f
a) b)
igA.
-
data
powder, from[12]). Data calculated from
exponential formula (5): a) Real
Imaginary
part
of I.medium, it canonly
I,e,
with an exponent a which aries withthe
fillingWe compared the values iven by this formula with
the
experimental data byNelson
and
You [12].From
the data shown in figure3
wecalculated
thea and f
as:
a( f)
=
1.655b)
a(f)
as
upper and ower mits for the
In figure 4 the effective ielectric unctions
of
a plasticmaterial
alled Kynar mixed ith air[12]
are
ottedagainst different volume fractions inwith
the respective effectiveDF'S predicted
by our
formula (5). The reementshows
that oursimulation
dataresulting
mixture
rule are consistent with xperimentalresults.
Data reported in [flare
alsoreproduced by formula (5).
4.
nclusion.We modeled
alculated resonance frequencies by
solving
a discretizedform
of axwell's equations. Wecompared the
resulting
ffective permittivities withthe data
given by
several
analytic
mixture
ormulas.Looyenga's formulawas
found to givethe
losest valuesto
the408 JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE I N°4
computer
simulations, although
the differencewas still very
high.
So we present a modifiedexponential
formula of the formga(f)
=
f ~a(f)
+ jf) ~a(f)
where the function
a(f)
may beapproximated by
a linear or a square root-like function. It describes well the data we obtained out of our computer simulations forfilling
factors below 0.3.Generalizations to
complex
values of £representing dissipation
are in progress.Acknowledgements.
The
investigations
weresupported by
the DeutscheForschungsgemeinschaft (SFB 341)
andby
the Bundesministerium fur
Forschung
undTechnologie /
Bonn. Discussions with D. StauTerare also
gratefully acknowledged.
References
[1] van Beek L-K-H-,
Progress
in Dielectrics 7(Heywood
Books, 1967) p.69.[2] Marquardt P. and Nimtz G., Phys. Rev. B 40
(1989)
7996.[3] Marquardt P. and Nimtz G., Phys. Rev. Lett. 57
(1986)
io36.[4] Maxwell-Gamett J-C-, Philos. Trans. R. Sac. A203
(1904)
385.[5] B6ttcher C-J-F-, Theory of Electric Polarization,
(Elsevier, Amsterdam,1952)
p.415.[6] Bruggeman D-A-G-, Ann. Phys. Fr. 24
(1935)
636.[7] Looyenga H., Physica
(Utrecht)
31(196S)
401.[8] Lichtenecker K., Phys. Z., XXVII
(192t)
its.[9] Weiland T., Part. Accel. 17
(1985)
227 and 15(1984)
245.[10] St6Izle S., Ph. D. Th., in progress.
[ii]
Numerical Recipes, Press W-H- et al.,(Cambridge
Univ. Press,1986).
[12] Nelson S-O- and You T-S-, J. Phys. D, Appl. Phys. 23