Publisher’s version / Version de l'éditeur:
Journal of power sources, 196, 22, pp. 9731-9736, 2011-11-15
READ THESE TERMS AND CONDITIONS CAREFULLY BEFORE USING THIS WEBSITE.
https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/copyright
Vous avez des questions? Nous pouvons vous aider. Pour communiquer directement avec un auteur, consultez la
première page de la revue dans laquelle son article a été publié afin de trouver ses coordonnées. Si vous n’arrivez pas à les repérer, communiquez avec nous à PublicationsArchive-ArchivesPublications@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca.
Questions? Contact the NRC Publications Archive team at
PublicationsArchive-ArchivesPublications@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca. If you wish to email the authors directly, please see the first page of the publication for their contact information.
NRC Publications Archive
Archives des publications du CNRC
This publication could be one of several versions: author’s original, accepted manuscript or the publisher’s version. / La version de cette publication peut être l’une des suivantes : la version prépublication de l’auteur, la version acceptée du manuscrit ou la version de l’éditeur.
For the publisher’s version, please access the DOI link below./ Pour consulter la version de l’éditeur, utilisez le lien DOI ci-dessous.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowrsour.2011.07.061
Access and use of this website and the material on it are subject to the Terms and Conditions set forth at
Synthesis and characterization of macroporous tin oxide composite as
an anode material for Li-ion batteries
Yim, Chae-Ho; Baranova, Elena A.; Courtel, Fabrice M.; Abu-Lebdeh, Yaser;
Davidson, Isobel J.
https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/droits
L’accès à ce site Web et l’utilisation de son contenu sont assujettis aux conditions présentées dans le site LISEZ CES CONDITIONS ATTENTIVEMENT AVANT D’UTILISER CE SITE WEB.
NRC Publications Record / Notice d'Archives des publications de CNRC:
https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/view/object/?id=7c820d38-de40-4f83-a79b-7dbf9f8b466d
https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/voir/objet/?id=7c820d38-de40-4f83-a79b-7dbf9f8b466d
ContentslistsavailableatScienceDirect
Journal
of
Power
Sources
j ou rn a l h o m e pa g e :w w w . e l s e v i e r . c o m / l o c a t e / j p o w s o u r
Synthesis
and
characterization
of
macroporous
tin
oxide
composite
as
an
anode
material
for
Li-ion
batteries
Chae-Ho
Yim
a,
Elena
A.
Baranova
a,
Fabrice
M.
Courtel
b,
Yaser
Abu-Lebdeh
b,∗,
Isobel
J.
Davidson
b aDepartmentofChemicalandBiologicalEngineering,UniversityofOttawa,161rueLouisPasteur,Ottawa,ON,K1N6N5,CanadabNationalResearchCouncilCanada,1200MontrealRoad,Ottawa,ON,K1A0R6,Canada
a
r
t
i
c
l
e
i
n
f
o
Articlehistory: Received7June2011
Receivedinrevisedform15July2011 Accepted16July2011
Available online 22 July 2011 Keywords:
MacroporousSnO2/Ccomposite SnO2
Li-ionbatteries
a
b
s
t
r
a
c
t
AmacroporousSnO2/Ccompositeanodematerialwassynthesizedusinganorganictemplate-assisted
method.Polystyrenespheresweresynthesizedandusedastemplateandleadtomacroporous
morphol-ogywithporesof300–500nmindiameterandasurfaceareaof54.7m2g−1.X-raydiffractionshowed
thattheSnO2nanoparticlesarecrystallizedinarutileP42/mnmlatticewiththepresenceofSnmetal
traces.ThesynthesizedmacroporousSnO2/Ccompositeprovidedpromisingperformanceinlithiumhalf
cellsshowingadischargecapacityof607mAhg−1after55cycles.Itwasfoundthatthemacroporous
SnO2/Ccompositeisstableandresistanttopulverizationuponcycling.
Crown Copyright © 2011 Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
Carbongraphitehasbeenthemostpopularanodematerialin useforLi-ion batteriesdue toitsmoderatecost, longcyclelife and negligible volumechange duringbattery cycling [1]. How-ever, due to its limited theoretical capacity to 372mAhg−1 or 833mAhmL−1,othermaterialsarebeingsoughtout;amongthem aremetalsthatcanreversiblyalloywithlithiumsuchassilicon (SiLi4.4,4200mAhg−1),tin(SnLi4.4,993mAhg−1),antimony(SbLi3, 660mAhg−1),andaluminium(LiAl,994mAhg−1)[1].Thesemetal alloysarepromisinganodematerialsduetotheirlithiumuptakeat lowpotentialandthreetotenfoldhighertheoreticalcapacities thangraphite. However,themajor problemwiththese materi-alsistheextremely largevolumechange(250–400%) uponthe alloying/dealloyingreactionwithlithium[1].Itcauses mechani-calcracks,pulverizationandlossofelectronicconductivityamong theparticlesandthecurrentcollector.Itresultsinanextremely poorbatterycyclelife[1–3].
One approach to prevent pulverization during the battery cyclingistominimizetheparticlesizeinmultiphasealloymatrices
[4]alongwiththeuseofbindersthatcanaccommodatevolume changes,suchassodiumcarboxymethylcellulose(NaCMC)[5]or styrenebutadienerubber(SBR)[6].Anotherapproachwouldbeto useaninertmatrixsuchasLi2OasinthecaseofSnO2.Itreacts withlithiuminatwo-stepprocess,firstviaanirreversible reac-tionwhereSnO2 isreducedintoSnthatthenfurtherreactswith
∗ Correspondingauthor.Tel.:+16139494184;fax:+16139912384. E-mailaddress:Yaser.Abu-Lebdeh@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca(Y.Abu-Lebdeh).
lithium byformingatin–lithium alloy[7].Asaresult, theLi2O matrixpreventsseverevolumechangeandkeepstheSnin nano-sizedform.AsreportedbyBrousseetal.[8],thesizeoftheparticles playsacrucialroleinthecaseoftinoxide,assmaller(nano) par-ticlesareabletobetteraccommodatetheabsolutevolumechange thanlarger(micro)ones.PristineSnO2nanoparticlesorcomposites usuallyshowamediumcapacityaround350–450mAhg−1atarate ofC/5[9–13].Bymaking3Dflower-shapedSnO2nanostructures, acapacityof670mAhg−1wasobtainedatarateofC/8.However, buildinguptheLi2Onetworkcouldnotpreventcompletevolume changes ofSn,leading topulverization.Otheralternativeshave beenintroduced,suchascoatingNi–SnontoCunano-rods[14],and sphericallyporousmulti-deckcageSnO2 [15].Otherapproaches includedispersionofSnO2particlesontoacarbonmaterial[13,16], or carboncoating ofSnO2 particles [17].Using a layer-by-layer technique to obtain carbon nanotubes as a substrate for SnO2 nanotubes (50wt%),Yang et al.[18] obtaineda specific capac-ityof450mAhg−1.Recently,researchgroupsstartedworkingon graphene/SnO2 compositesasawaytobetteraccommodatethe volume change;SnO2 nanoparticleswouldbetrapped between layersofgraphene,asshowninthefollowingRefs.[19–24].
Three-dimensionallyorderedmacroporous(3DOM)materials havebeenusedforavarietyofapplicationsinchemicaland bio-chemical sensors[26–28],photonicbandgapmaterials[29–31]
andnanofabrication[32].Thesynthesisofthistypeofmaterials involvestheuseofacolloidaltemplate[25].3DOMmaterial syn-thesiswasadaptedinthisworktoobtainanorderedcarbon-coated porousSnO2thatwouldpreventthesignificantvolumechangeand Snpulverization duringbattery cycling.In a battery,thehighly orderedmacroporousmaterialshouldhavegreatersurfacein
con-0378-7753/$–seefrontmatter.Crown Copyright © 2011 Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.07.061
9732 C.-H.Yimetal./JournalofPowerSources196 (2011) 9731–9736
tactwiththeelectrolyteandleadtobetterlithiumdiffusionintothe electrodematerial,andthusfastercharge/dischargerate.Porous SnO2templated-structureshaveimprovedalotofthereversible capacityandalsotheratecapabilityofSnO2electrodes,asshown byKimandCho[33];theyobtainedcapacitiesof775mAhg−1at C,whichisalmostthetheoreticalreversiblecapacityofSnO2.At higherrates,acapacity upto730mAhg−1 wasobtainedat10C, which is 93% of thetheoretical reversible capacity. The use of polystyrene(PS)asanorganiccolloidaltemplatenotonlymade itpossibletomakeacarboncoatedmacroporousSnO2/C compos-itebutalsotoobtainahighcarboncontentduetothenatureofthe thermaldecompositionofPS.Highcarboncontentwillimprovethe electronicconductivityoftheelectrodeandthuscompensatefor theinsulatingnatureofLi2O.Poly(methylmethacrylate)(PMMA) colloidsareanothercommontemplatetosynthesize3DOM crys-tals.However,depolymerisationofPMMAduringsinteringsteps reducestheamountofcarbonspreadoverSnO2/C[34].Therefore thePScolloidscanbeconsideredbettercandidatetodisperseSnO2 particlesintothecarbonmacroporousmaterial.
Ingeneral,3DOMmaterialsaresynthesizedbyinfiltrationof precursorsolutionontoatemplate[35–37].Inthiswork,weused adifferentapproachbymakingaSnO2/PScompositebymeansof ahydrothermalreaction.Thiswasfollowedbyacalcinationstep at600◦CinargoninordertodecomposethePScolloidsandform aporouscarbonmatrixsurroundingtheSnO2nanoparticles.The performanceofthemacroporousSnO2/Ccompositeandpristine SnO2nanoparticleswascomparedinlithiumhalfcellbatteryusing sodiumcarboxymethylcellulose(NaCMC)asbinder.
2. Materialsandmethods 2.1. Syntheses
PScolloidsweresynthesizedbyemulsion polymerization,as describedbyHollandetal.[25].Thestyrenemonomerwasobtained from Sigma–Aldrich (≥99% Reagentplus) and waspurged with nitrogenpriortouse.Then,50mLofstyrenewasaddedto425mL ofde-ionizedwater,whichwasalsopurgedwithnitrogen.The mix-turewasheatedto70◦C.Toinitializethepolymerization,25mLof nitrogenpurged0.1MK2S2O8(Sigma–Aldrich,99%)aqueous solu-tionwasaddedtothemixture.Thesolutionwaskeptat70◦Cfor 24hundernitrogen.ThePScolloids werewashedwithethanol (CommercialAlcoholsInc.,95%)andcentrifugedat10,000rpmfor 1htoobtaintheorderedorganictemplate.Thisstepwasrepeated threetimestoremovetheinorganicimpurities.
Tinoxidewassynthesizedbymeansofahydrothermalreaction. First,0.356gofSnCl2·2H2O(Fisher,98.4%)wasdissolvedin50mLof de-ionizedwaterand50mLofethanol.Then,0.240gofPScolloids wereaddedtothesolutionandmixedfor24husingmagnetic stir-ringtohomogenizeanddispersethePScolloidsinthesolution.The beakercontainingthesolutionwascoveredwithaparafilmto pre-ventwater/ethanolevaporation.Theresultantmilkysolutionwas putintoanautoclavereactor(Parr,BombNo.4744)for6hat120◦C. Afterthesynthesis,theautoclavereactorcontainingthesolution waslefttocooltoroomtemperature.Theresultingsolutionwas centrifugedtoorderthePScolloidsandbuildtheSnO2/PS compos-ite.Theobtainedpowderwaswashedthreetimeswithethanol, andthencalcinatedunderargon.Thefirstsinteringstepwas con-ductedat260◦Cfor3h,whilethesecondsinteringwasconducted at600◦Cforanother3h.SincethemeltingpointofPSis240◦C,the firstsinteringat260◦CensuredthatPSmelteddownfromthe crys-tallizedSnO2phase.Aslowheatingrateof2◦Cmin−1wasused.The calcinationwasperformedunderargoninordertoobtainacarbon coatingontotheSnO2nanocomposite(SnO2/C).Thesamesynthetic
procedurewasfollowedbutwithouttheadditionofthePStemplate topreparethenon-templatedpristineSnO2nanoparticles. 2.2. Characterizationofcompositematerials
PowderX-raydiffractionwascarriedoutbetween15◦and85◦ (2angles) usingaBrukerAXSD8diffractometerwitha CoK␣ sourcewith35kVand45mAofpower,adivergenceangleof0.3◦, astepsizeof0.027◦,andanacquisitiontimeof1sperstep.The patternswereanalyzedbytheRietveldrefinementmethod[38]
usingthesoftwareTOPASv4.2fromBrukerAXS[39].Thecrystallite sizesweredeterminedusingthefundamentalparameterapproach methoddevelopedbyChearyandCoelho[40].Themorphologyof thematerialwascharacterizedbyscanningelectronmicroscopy (SEM)usingaJEOL840A.Thermalgravimetricanalysis(TGA)was performedtoquantifytheamountofcarbonpresentintheSnO2/C composite.ATGA2950TAinstrumentwasused.Thecompositewas heatedat10◦Cmin−1upto110◦Cfor30mintoremovemoisture containedinthematerialandthenheatedcontinuouslyupto800◦C inairinordertooxidizethecarbonfromthecomposite.
Furtherelectrochemicalcharacterizationwasperformedusing a 2325-type coin cell. Because of the interest in SnO2/C com-posite,onlyhalf cellswithlithium asa counter electrodewere used.Theelectrode waspreparedfroma slurrymadeof75wt% activematerial,5wt%carbonSuperS(Timcalgraphiteand Car-bon,Switzerland),5wt%carbongraphiteE-KS4(KG,Lonza G+T, Switzerland)and15wt%sodiumcarboxymethylcellulose(NaCMC, Calbiochem)asabinder.NaCMCwasusedasa5wt%solution dis-solvedindoubledistilledH2O.Theslurrywascastontoacopper foilcurrentcollectorthatwascleanedusinga 2.5%HClsolution inwater.Thecastwaspreparedusinganautomateddoctorblade spreaderanddriedovernightinaconvectionovenat85◦C,and thenina vacuumovenovernightat80◦C.Individualelectrodes (Ø=12.5mm)were punched out, dried at 80◦C under vacuum overnight,pressedundera pressureof0.5metric ton,andwere usedaspositiveelectrodes.Alithiumdisk(Ø=16.5mm)wasused asanegativeelectrode(counterelectrodeandreferenceelectrode). 70Lof1MLiPF6inEC:DMC(1:1byvol.)wasusedaselectrolyte andspreadoveradoublelayerofthepolypropyleneseparators. Thebatterieswereassembledinanargon-filleddrybox.Thecells werecycledgalvanostaticallyatC/12usinganArbinbatterycycler andtestedusingcyclicvoltammetrytechniques.Cyclic voltamme-trywascarriedoutusingaBiologicVMP3potentiostatandswept at0.1mVs−1between5mVand1.5Vforfivecycles.
3. Resultsanddiscussion
Atwo-stepsynthesiswasnecessarytoachieveamacroscopic porousstructureofcarbon-coatedSnO2andthecarbonnetworkin whichtheSnO2nanoparticlesaredispersed.PScolloidswereused toobtaintheporousmorphology.Thechallengeherewasto syn-thesizeSnO2withoutdestroyingthePScolloids.Toachievethis,a hydrothermalreactionwasused.First,thetinprecursor (SnCl2) hadtoundergooxidation reactionata temperaturelowerthan 240◦CtopreventthemeltingofPS. Moreover,theorganic tem-platehadtobecalcinedunderoxygen-freeatmospheretoobtaina carboncoating.Thus,thehydrothermalreactionfollowedby calci-nationunderargonwastotallyadequate.Duringthecentrifugation step,thePScolloidswereorderedandthevoidsamongthe col-loidswerefilledwiththeSnO2nanoparticles.Fig.1showstheSEM micrographofthepreparedanddriedSnO2/PScomposite.ThePS colloidsareorderedandtheirintegrityispreserved.Fig.2shows theRietveldrefinementoftheXRDpatternoftheSnO2/PS com-posite.Thefirstbroadpeakaround23◦2correspondstothePS reflection.TheotherpeakscorrespondtotheSnO2rutileP42/mnm
Fig.1.SEMmicrographsofthecentrifugedanddriedSnO2/PScomposite synthe-sizedviaahydrothermalreaction.Inset:SEMmicrographofthePScolloidsusedfor thesynthesis.
Fig.2.RietveldrefinementoftheX-raydiffractionpatternofthecentrifugedand driedSnO2/PScompositesynthesizedviaahydrothermalreaction.
Table1
LatticeparametersofSnO2beforeandafterremovaloforganictemplate.
a( ˚A) c( ˚A) SnO2/PS Synthesized 4.753(8) 3.249(6) Ref.[44] 4.73 3.18 Crystalsize(nm) 3.2(2) SnO2/C Synthesized 4.7424(8) 3.1873(6) Ref.[44] 4.73 3.18 Crystalsize(nm) 6.37(4) Sn Synthesized 5.831(9) 3.13(1) Ref.[45] 5.83 3.18
Crystalsize(nm) N/A
structure:31◦(110),40◦(101)and61◦(211).Thelattice parame-tersandcrystallitesizeareshowninTable1.Thelatticeparameter valuesslightlydeviatefromthereferencevaluesduetothe amor-phousnaturefortheobtainedmaterial.Crystallitesizebelow5nm hasbeencalculated.Itisimportanttonotethatnootherphases wereobservedontheXRDpatterns.
Fig.3. SEMmicrographofthemacroporousSnO2/Ccompositeafterthecalcination ofthetemplateunderargonat260◦Cfor3h,and600◦Cfor3h.
Fig.4. RietveldrefinementoftheX-raydiffractionpatternofthemacroporous SnO2/Ccompositeaftercalcinationofthetemplateunderargonat260◦Cfor3h, and600◦Cfor3h.
TheresultingSnO2/PScompositeswerecalcinedunderargon in order toobtainporousand carbon-coated SnO2.The porous morphology wasachievedby a slowheating rateat 2◦Cmin−1 andsinteringattwodifferenttemperaturesinordertocontrolthe decompositionofPS.Fig.3showstheSEMmicrographafterthe cal-cinationofthePStemplate.ThefingerprintofthePScolloidscan beobservedasasphericalporousmorphology.Arandomlyordered butinterconnectedmacroporousopenstructurewasobtained,very differentthana3DOM.Mostofthepores’diameterrangesfrom300 to500nm,whichcorrespondstothesizeofthePScolloids. How-ever,somevoidsarebiggerthanthesizeofthePScolloidsthatcould beduetothevolatiledecompositionofPScolloidsortheabsence ofSnO2nanoparticlesbetweensomePScolloidsbeforethe calcina-tionstep.Thedarkareasoftheimageareduetotheunevensurface oftheSnO2/Ccomposite,wheretheSnO2isabsentpriortothe cal-cinations.AlsoduetothefactthatSnO2islessconductive,SnO2 comesoutasbrighterareaintheSEMimage.
Fig. 4 shows the Rietveld refinement of the pattern of the finalmacroporousSnO2/Ccomposite.Twocrystallinephasesare observed:SnO2andSn.TheappearanceofSnaftercalcinationis believedtobetheresultofthereducingatmosphere.This orig-inatesfromthecalcinationatelevatedtemperatureofPSunder
9734 C.-H.Yimetal./JournalofPowerSources196 (2011) 9731–9736
Fig.5.ThermogravimetricanalysisofthemacroporousSnO2/Ccompositeafter calcinationofthetemplateunderargonat260◦Cfor3h,and600◦Cfor3h.The measurementwasdoneunderairat10◦Cmin−1.
Fig.6. Cyclicvoltammogramsofahalf-cellmeasuredbetween0.005Vand1.5V at0.1mVs−1ofthemacroporousSnO2/Ccompositeafterthecalcinationsteps.Li metalwasusedascounterandreferenceelectrode.
argon,whichprovidesreducingconditions,leadingtothe reduc-tionofsomeSn4+ofSnO
2toSn0.Asaresult,1.1wt%ofcrystalline Snwasestimatedviaacomputinganalysis(Topasv4.2).Table1
showsthelatticeparametersandthecrystallitesizeobtainedfrom theXRDpatternofthesinteredSnO2/Ccomposite.Lattice param-etersareinagreementwiththereferencedvalues(Table1).Due tothehighcalcinationtemperature,growthinthecrystallitesize wasobservedfromlessthan5nmupto6.37(4)nm.TheBET sur-faceareaofthecompositewas54.7m2g−1,whichisverysimilar towhatisreportedbyLytleetal.(55m2g−1)[35].
ToestimatetheamountofcarboninthesynthesizedSnO2/C composite,TGAwasconductedontheresultingmaterial.Asshown in Fig.5, continuousweight loss wasobserved when the tem-peraturewas raisedup to110◦C;it corresponds totheloss of water.Thetemperaturewasmaintainedat110◦Cfor30minin ordertoremoveanymoisture.Thetemperaturewasthenincreased to800◦Cat10◦Cmin−1.Thesecondweightloss(8.3%)observed between350and 450◦C wastheresultofthedecompositionof carbonfromtheSnO2/Ccomposite.Whenconsideringthatthere is1.1wt%ofSn,0.2%weightgainoccurredduetotheoxidationof
Fig.7. VoltageprofileofthefirstfivecyclesofthemacroporousSnO2/Ccomposite. ArateofC/12wasused.
Fig.8.DischargecapacityofthemacroporousSnO2/Ccompositeandthepristine SnO2nanoparticles.ThecolumbicefficiencyofthemacroporousSnO2/Ccomposite isalsorepresented.
Sn.Asaresult,0.2wt%shouldbeaddedtothe8.3%weightlossto moreaccuratelyestimatetheamountofcarboninthesynthesized SnO2/Ccomposite.ThetotalamountofcarbonresidueinSnO2/C compositeisthencanbeestimatedas8.5wt%.
Fig.6showsthecyclicvoltammograms(CVs)ofthe macrop-orousSnO2/Ccomposite.TheirreversiblereductionofSnO2toSn (blackline)isobservedonthefirstcycle.Thesmallcathodicpeak around1.25V(peakA)andthepeakat0.65V(peakB)vs.Li/Li+are duetothepartialreductionofSnO2toelementSnandthesolid electrolyteinterface(SEI)formationduringthefirstdischarge[41]. SEIformationiscausedbythedecompositionoftheelectrolyteand thelithiumsaltatthesurfaceoftheelectrode,andbothpeaks dis-appearafterthefirstcycle.Thecathodicpeaksbelow0.3V(peakb) areduetotheformationoftheLixSnalloy(0≤x≤4.4).Thenoise inthesepeaksis duetothemulti-stagelithiumintercalationof LixSnalloys[42].Theanodicpeakat0.6V(peakb′)correspondsto
thede-alloyingreactionofLixSn(0≤x≤4.4).Thesetworeactions arefullyreversible.Anadditionalreversibleprocessisobservedat 1.25V(peaka′)and1.0V(peaka).Thisprocessisbelievedtobe associatedwiththerecovery,tosomeextent,ofsometinoxides (SnO2orSnO)[42,43].
UsingthecompositiondeterminedviaTGAandXRD,the the-oreticalcapacityvalueofthemacroporousSnO2/Ccompositewas estimatedat732mAhg−1.Areversiblecapacityof150mAhg−1was usedforthecarboncoating,assumingitisablackcarbon.In the-ory,SnO2 exhibitafirstdischargecapacityof1494mAhg−1 and areversibledischargecapacityof782mAhg−1.Thereweremany attemptstosynthesize3DOMSnO2,however,onlyLytleetal.[35] andWangetal.[36]performedelectrochemicalcharacterizations.
Fig.7shows thevoltageprofileofthefirstfive cyclesof ahalf cellmadeusingthemacroporousSnO2/Ccomposite;thecellwas cycledatC/12.Thefirstcycleshowsafirstdischargecapacityof 1705mAhg−1.Thisvaluecorrespondstotheirreversiblereduction ofSnO2 toSn,theformationofLi2O,andthepartiallithiationof thecarboncoating.Snthenfurtherreactedwithlithiumtoform a tin–lithiumalloy. Thesereactionsareshown in thefollowing equations:
SnO2+4Li++4e−→Sn+2Li2O (1) Sn+xLi++xe−↔ SnLix(0≤x≤4.4) (2) 6C+xLi++xe−↔C6Lix(0≤x≤1) (3) Thefirstdischargecurvecontainsseveralfluctuationsdueto noiseoriginatedfromtheequipment.Thechargeisrepresented byaslopingplateauaround0.5Vvs.Li/Li+.Theirreversible capac-ityobservedinthefirstcycleis800mAhg−1,or47%ofthefirst dischargecapacity[13].Afterwards,cyclesfourandfivearerather stable,suggestinggoodcapacityretention.
Fig.8showsthedischargecapacitiesofthemacroporousSnO2/C compositeandthepristineSnO2nanoparticlespreparedwithout PStemplate as wellas the columbicefficiency of the macrop-orousSnO2/Ccompositeelectrode.Aspreviouslydiscussed,alarge irreversiblecapacityisobservedforthefirstcycleduetothe irre-versiblereductionofSnO2toSnandtheformationoftheSEI.The macroporousSnO2/Ccomposite showedafirstdischarge capac-ity of 1705mAhg−1 with 47% of irreversible capacity whereas theSnO2nanoparticlesshowsalowerfirstdischargecapacityof 1150mAhg−1withanirreversibilityof37%.Thelargerirreversible capacityobservedforthemacroporousSnO2/Ccompositeisdueto thecarboncoatingandalsoduetothelargersurfaceareathatleads tomoreSEIformation.Forthefirstsevencycles,astable capac-ityof900mAhg−1 wasobserved.Aftera12-hrest,thecapacity startedfading.Areversiblecapacity of607mAhg−1 isobserved after55cycles.Thecolumbicefficiencyisquitestablearound98% startingatcycle8.ThemacroporousSnO2/Ccompositeshowed bet-tercapacityretentionthanthepristineSnO2nanoparticleswhich exhibitsacapacityofonly300mAhg−1after55cycles.Wangetal. reportedfirstdischargecapacitiesaround1500–1600mAhg−1and reversible capacities of 150mAhg−1 and 330mAhg−1 after 55 cyclesat current rates of50 and 100mAg−1, respectively [36]. Thesevaluesaremuchlowerthantheonesobtainedinthepresent studywhichwebelieveisduetothedifferenceintheamountof carbonpresentinthecomposite.Moreover,Wangetal.reported acarboncontentof62wt%whereasitisonly8.5wt%inourcase
[36].Itisimportanttohavecarboninthecompositetoprovide electronicconductivity,buttheblack carbonobtaineddoesnot providehighcapacitystorage,soitisimportanttokeepits con-tentlowinordertoobtainbetterperformance.3DOMSnO2from Wangetal.hadlesscapacityfadeduetothehighlyordered struc-ture,butlowercapacityduetothehighcarboncontentcompared toourmaterial.
4. Conclusions
Inthepresentwork,amacroporousSnO2/Ccompositeanode material was synthesized using an organic template-assisted
hydrothermalsynthesis.Acontentof8.5wt%ofcarbonwas deter-minedinthecomposite.AsverifiedbySEM,aftercalcinations,pores of300–500nmindiameterwereobserved.ArutileSnO2crystalline phasewasobtainedbyXRDwithtracesofSnmetal.Thematerial performance,characterizedinhalfcells,suggeststhatnano-sized porousSnO2matrixmaterialisstableandresistantto pulveriza-tionduringcycling.After55 cycles,themacroporouscomposite had a capacity of 607mAhg−1, whereas the SnO
2 nanoparti-clewithoutPStemplateshowedonlyhalfthecapacityreaching 300mAhg−1.
References
[1] G.-A.Nazri,G.Pistoia,LithiumBatteries:ScienceandTechnology,Kluwer Aca-demicPublisher,Boston/Dordrecht/NewYork/London,2003.
[2]J.Li,R.B.Lewis,J.R.Dahn,ElectrochemicalandSolid-StateLetters10(2007) A17–A20.
[3]U.Kasavajjula,C.Wang,A.J.Appleby,JournalofPowerSources163(2007) 1003–1039.
[4]J.O.Besenhard,J.Yang,M.Winter,JournalofPowerSources68(1997)87–90. [5]S.D.Beattie,D.Larcher,M.Morcrette,B.Simon,J.M.Tarascon,Journalofthe
ElectrochemicalSociety155(2008)A158–A163.
[6] H.Buqa,M.Holzapfel,F.Krumeich,C.Veit,P.Novák,JournalofPowerSources 161(2006)617–622.
[7]I.A.Courtney,J.R.Dahn,JournaloftheElectrochemicalSociety144(1997) 2045–2052.
[8] T.Brousse,O.Crosnier,J.Santos-Pe ˜na,I.Sandu,P.Fragnaud,D.M.Schleich,in:N. Kumagai,S.Komaba(Eds.),MaterialsChemistryinLithiumBatteries,Research Signpost,Kerala,2002.
[9]S.H.Ng,D.I.dosSantos,S.Y.Chew,D.Wexler,J.Wang,S.X.Dou,H.K.Liu, Elec-trochemistryCommunications9(2007)915–919.
[10]Y.-C.Chen,J.-M.Chen,Y.-H.Huang,Y.-R.Lee,H.C.Shih,SurfaceandCoatings Technology202(2007)1313–1318.
[11]Y.Wang,F.Su,J.Y.Lee,X.S.Zhao,ChemistryofMaterials18(2009)1347– 1353.
[12] V.Subramanian,W.W.Burke,H.Zhu,B.Wei,J.Phys.Chem.C112(2008) 4550–4556.
[13]F.M.Courtel,E.A.Baranova,Y.Abu-Lebdeh,I.J.Davidson,JournalofPower Sources195(2010)2355–2361.
[14] J.Hassoun,S.Panero,P.Simon,P.L.Taberna,B.Scrosati,AdvancedMaterials19 (2007)1632–1635.
[15]Y.Yu,C.H.Chen,Y.Shi,AdvancedMaterials19(2007)993–997.
[16] J.Y.Lee,R.Zhang,Z.Liu,ElectrochemicalandSolid-StateLetters 3(2000) 167–170.
[17]T.Moon,C.Kim,S.T.Hwang,B.Park,ElectrochemicalandSolid-StateLetters (2006)9.
[18] N.Du,H.Zhang,B.Chen,X.Ma,X.Huang,J.Tu,D.Yang,MaterialsResearch Bulletin44(2009)211–215.
[19]Z.Du,X.Yin,M.Zhang,Q.Hao,Y.Wang,T.Wang,MaterialsLetters64(2010) 2076–2079.
[20] J.Yao,X.Shen,B.Wang,H.Liu,G.Wang,ElectrochemistryCommunications11 (2009)1849–1852.
[21]Z.Wang,H.Zhang,N.Li,Z.Shi,Z.Gu,G.Cao,NanoResearch3(2010)748– 756.
[22] S.-M.Paek,E.Yoo,I.Honma,NanoLetters9(2008)72–75. [23]X.Wang,X.Zhou,K.Yao,J.Zhang,Z.Liu,Carbon49(2011)133–139. [24]S.Liang,X.Zhu,P.Lian,W.Yang,H.Wang,JournalofSolid-StateChemistry184
(2011)1400–1404.
[25]B.T.Holland,C.F.Blanford,T.Do,A.Stein,ChemistryofMaterials11(1999) 795–805.
[26]T.Cassagneau,F.Caruso,AdvancedMaterials14(2002)1629–1633. [27]C.E.Reese,M.E.Baltusavich,J.P.Keim,S.A.Asher,AnalyticalChemistry73(2001)
5038–5042.
[28]J.M.Weissman,H.B.Sunkara,A.S.Tse,S.A.Asher,Science274(1996)959–960. [29]W.Cheng,J.Wang,U.Jonas,G.Fytas,N.Stefanou,NatureMaterials5(2006)
830–836.
[30]J.D.Joannopoulos,P.R.Villeneuve,S.Fan,Nature386(1997)143–149. [31]E.Yablonovitch,ScientificAmerican285(2001)34–41.
[32]U.C.Fischer,H.P.Zingsheim,JournalofVacuumScience&Technology19(1981) 881–885.
[33]H.Kim,J.Cho,JournalofMaterialsChemistry18(2008)771–775. [34] W.R.Zeng,S.F.Li,W.K.Chow,JournalofFireSciences20(2002)401–433. [35]J.C.Lytle,H.Yan,N.S.Ergang,W.H.Smyrl,A.Stein,JournalofMaterials
Chem-istry14(2004)1616–1622.
[36]Z.Wang,M.A.Fierke,A.Stein,JournaloftheElectrochemicalSociety155(2008) A658–A663.
[37]H.Yan,S.Sokolov,J.C.Lytle,A.Stein,F.Zhang,W.H.Smyrl,Journalofthe ElectrochemicalSociety150(2003).
[38] H.Rietveld,ActaCrystallographica22(1967)151–152.
[39] BrukerAXS,DIFFRACPlusTOPAS:TOPAS4.2UserManual,Bruker-AXSGmbH, Karlsruhe,Germany,2008.
9736 C.-H.Yimetal./JournalofPowerSources196 (2011) 9731–9736
[41]Z.-Q.He,X.-H.Li,L.-Z.Xiong,X.-M.Wu,Z.-B.Xiao,M.-Y.Ma,MaterialsResearch Bulletin40(2005)861–868.
[42]M.Mohamedi,S.J.Lee,D.Takahashi,M.Nishizawa,T.Itoh,I.Uchida, Elec-trochimicaActa46(2001)1161–1168.
[43]T.Brousse,R.Retoux,U.Herterich,D.M.Schleich,JournaloftheElectrochemical Society145(1998)1–4.
[44]T.Maekawa,C.Minagoshi,S.Nakamura,K.Nomura,H.Kageyama,Chemical Sensors24(2008)3.
[45]M.Wolcyrz,R.Kubiak,S.Maciejewski,PhysicaStatusSolidi(B)BasicResearch 107(1981)245–253.