• Aucun résultat trouvé

Ocean circulation: quiz 1

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Ocean circulation: quiz 1"

Copied!
2
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Ocean circulation: quiz 1

This quiz aims at testing your basic knowledge of geophysical fluid dynamics and the associated mathematical background. It will be highly useful for a good understanding of Chapter 2 and Chapter 3 of the lecture. Please give a mathematical answer together with its interpretation in plain words.

1. Gradient. Given a physical scalar such as temperature T(x, y, z, t), define its gradient vector. What is its physical meaning?

2. Divergence. Given the velocity vector v(x, y, z, t), define its divergence. What is its physical meaning?

3. Vorticity. Given the velocity vector v(x, y, z, t), define its vorticity. What is its physical meaning?

4. Material (Lagrangian) versus local (Eulerian) derivative. Given temperature T(x, y, z, t), give the notation and physical meaning of its Lagrangian and Eulerian tem- poral derivatives.

5. Chain rule of derivation. Given a function f(x, y, z, t), give the chain rule for its temporal derivation dfdt as a function of its partial derivatives ∂f∂x, ∂f∂y, ∂f∂z and ∂f∂t. Deduce the mathematical relation between Lagrangian and Eulerian accelerations. Interpret their difference.

6. Taylor series expansion. Given a functionf(x, y), express its first order Taylor expan- sion and interpret its meaning. Deduce a simplified expression for density ρ(T, S) as a function of salinity and temperature, with respect to a reference stateρ0(T0, S0).

7. Conservation laws. Which one of these quantities does not dispose of a law of conser- vation?

• Mass.

• Heat.

• Pressure.

• Momentum.

8. Mixing. Let two incompressible water masses of volume Vi (i = 1,2), temperature Ti

and salinity Si mix entirely. Deduce from conservation of mass (for salt) and heat the temperatureT and salinity S of the resulting water mass.

9. Reynolds averaging. Given a variablex, define its Reynolds average and perturbation.

Express a heat transport uT as a function of the Reynolds average and perturbation of velocityu and temperatureT. How do you interpret each term?

10. Reynolds number. Recall the expression for the Reynolds number. What terms of the momentum equation (Newton’s 2nd law) does it compare? What is its typical value for large-scale oceanic motion, and how do you interpret it?

11. Rossby number. Recall the expression for the Rossby number. What terms of the momentum equation does it compare? What is its typical value for large-scale oceanic motion, and how do you interpret it?

(2)

12. Hydrostatic balance. Recall the hydrostatic relation. What is its physical interpreta- tion? How well is it verified in the ocean?

13. Geostrophic balance. Recall the geostrophic balance. What is its physical interpreta- tion? Where does it hold in the ocean?

14. Ekman balance. Recall the Ekman balance. What is its physical interpretation? Where does it hold in the ocean?

Références

Documents relatifs

In Section 1 we put an emphasis on the Lagrangian model and give a detailed and simple proof of existence of optimal irrigation plans without resorting to parameterizations as done

The method is based on the time- frequency decomposition of variance called ‘‘maximum overlap discrete wavelet transform.’’ The results show that the Ellison length scale can be

40 succeeded in developing the simple and efficient synthesis of three novel 9-hydroxyellipticine derivatives linked with a glucose moiety by a triazole ring-succinate

Conceptual scientific systems can be thought to form a next stage in the development of the higher mental functions; the meaning produced at each stage refers to some

Variance of scalar, scalar viscous term, scalar production term, scalar advection term, Lagrangian time rate of change, and Eulerian time rate of change, for five values of the

As a matter of fact, Basic English can be seen as a practical experiment in W’s language games (moreover, Masterman will develop a similar approach to the one from Ogden, using

However the Stokes drift of a spe trum of wind waves is strongly surfa e trapped so that, in the presen e of a strong verti al mixing, δ s ≪ δe and the mean ow driven by

In Fig.6-13(b), we show their initial and final position as well as their centers’ trajectories under Lagrangian advection. These eddies remain coherent, their boundaries don’t