HAL Id: jpa-00223071
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/jpa-00223071
Submitted on 1 Jan 1983
HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.
L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.
CHARACTERIZATION OF DISLOCATIONS AND THEIR EFFECTS IN SILICON DEVICE
TECHNOLOGY
M. Kittler, W. Seifert, E. Bugiel, H. Richter
To cite this version:
M. Kittler, W. Seifert, E. Bugiel, H. Richter. CHARACTERIZATION OF DISLOCATIONS AND THEIR EFFECTS IN SILICON DEVICE TECHNOLOGY. Journal de Physique Colloques, 1983, 44 (C4), pp.C4-437-C4-443. �10.1051/jphyscol:1983451�. �jpa-00223071�
der DDR, DDR- 1156 Ber Zin-Rahnsdorf, Seestrasse 82, D.R. G.
REsum6 - On p r e s e n t e d e s e t u d e s m e t h o d i q u e s d e s c a u s e s d u c o n t r a s t E B f F a e s d i s l o c a t i o n s e t d e s o n e v a l u a t i o n . On m o n t r e d e s a p p l i - c a t i o n s d e l a methode E B I C 3 l a r e c h e r c h e d e l ' i n f l u e n c e d e s d i s l o c a t i o n s s u r l e s p e r f o m a n c e s d e c o m p o s a n t s , i n f l u e n c e n e g a - t i v e ( a u g m e n t a t i o n du c o n s t a n t i n v e r s e ) e t p o s i t i v e ( p i 6 g e a g e i n t e r n e ) .
A b s t r a c t
-
M e t h o d i c a l s t u d i e s on cause and v a l u a t i o n o f t h e d i s l o c a t i o n EBIC c o n t r a s t a r e presented. The a p p l i c a t i o n o f t h e EBIC method t o i n v e s t i g a t i o n s o f n e g a t i v e (enhancedreverse c u r r e n t ) and p o s i t i v e ( i n t r i n s i c get t e r i n g ) e f f e c t s o f d i s l o c a t i o n s on device performance a r e demonstrated.
1. I n t r o d u c t i o n
-
W id e f e c t i n f l u e n c e s on t h a t even i n d i v i d u a l
t h proceeding r e d u c t i o n o f device dimensions d e v i c e o p e r a t i o n g a i n growing importance so d i s l o c a t i o n s may become a s e r i o u s problem. On t h e o t h e r hand, p o s i t i v e e f f e c t s may r e s u l t from d i s l o c a t i o n s due t o g e t t e r i n g o f i m p u r i t i e s . Therefore, t h e r e a r i s e s t h e need f o r c h a r a c t e r i z a t i o n o f i n d i v i d u a l d i s l o c a t i o n s w i t h respect t o e l e c t r i c a l a c t i v i t y and g e t t e r i n g .
2. EBIC defect c o n t r a s t
-
I t has been e s t a b l i s h e d t h a t t h e EBIC c o n t r a s t o f d i s l o c a t i o n s ( d e f e c t s ) depends i n a complex way on a l o t o f parameters: p r o p e r t i e s o f t h e defect (shape and p o s i t i o n , e l e c t r i c a l p r o p e r t i e s ) , p r o p e r t i e s o f t h e sample (doping andd i f f u s i o n l e n g t h , measuring geometry), o p e r a t i n g c o n d i t i o n s o f t h e SEM /I,2,3/. The p r i m a r y i n t e r e s t o f EBIC d e f e c t i n v e s t i g a t i o n s i s t o o b t a i n i n f o r m a t i o n on e l e c t r i c a l defect p r o p e r t i e s which can n o t be r e a l i z e d by s i m p l e imaging o n 1
.
Even t h e v a l u e o f t h e EBIC c o n t r a s t c i s no d i r e c t measure f o r e x e c t r i c a l d e f e c t p r o e r t L e s1
because t h e r e h o l d s a r e l a t i o n c = r x F ( R , L, geometry) etween s t r e n g t h
r
d e s c r i b i n g p r i m a r i l y t h e recombinat i o n p r o p e r t i e s o f t h e d e f e c t and c o n t r a s t c. The c o r r e c t i o n f a c t o r F i s a f u n c t i o n which takes i n t o accouat t h e i n f l u e n c e o f e l e c t r o n range R, o f d i f f u s i o n l e n g t h L o u t s i d e t h e d e f e c t , and o f geometry on c o n t r a s t /4/. For s e m i q u a n t i t a t i v e i n v e s t i g a t i o n s o f d e f e c t s t r e n g t h t h e c a l c u l a t i o n o f c o r r e c t i o n f a c t o r s on t h e base o f DONOLATO'S t h e o r y /5/ i s u s e f u l . An i m p o r t a n t r e s u l t o f h i s t h e o r y i s t h e p r e d i c t i o n o f a v e r y s m a l l dependence o f c o n t r a s t w i d t h on d i f f u s i o n l e n g t h . Fig. 1 shows a comparison between a s i m u l a t e d image o f a d i s l o c a t i o ni n c l i n e d t o t h e s u r f a c e ( t a k e n from / 6 / ) and an e x p e r i m e n t a l
micrograph o f a corresponding d i s l o c a t i o n . I n b o t h cases t h e c o n t r a s t w i d t h i s i n t h e o r d e r o f t h e e l e c t r o n range R and n o t i n t h e o r d e r o f L.
Article published online by EDP Sciences and available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/jphyscol:1983451
C4-438 JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE
Fig. 1
-
EBIC c o n t r a s t of a d i s l o c a t i o n lyxng i n c l i n e d t o surface ( i n c l i n a t i o n angle 15')a) image s i m u l a t i o n f o r L - I c e 0 a f t e r DONOLATO /6/
b b ) EBIC micrograph (inverse cont r a s t )
f o r L sv 1000 um /2/
/
The usefulness o f the simple model o f DONOLATO f o r s e m i q u a n t i t a t i v e i n v e s t i g a t i o n s o f defect recombinat i o n p r o p e r t i e s i s demonst r a t e d i n f i g , 2 by determination o f t h e defect s t r e n g t h from c o n t r a s t c f o r two SF.
I n /7/ t h e r e was obtained an expression r e l a t i n g c o n t r a s t c t o recombinat i o n centres a t t h e d i s l o c a t i o n :
e i s the number o f centres p e r d i s l o c a t i o n length, 6 capture cgoss s e c t i o n of the centres, D the d i f f u s i v i t y o f m i n d r i t y c a r r i e r s , and V t h e i r thermal v e l o c i t
.
According t o t h e givenr e l a t i o n the pr68uct e x d can be ogtained from EBTC measure- ments if the c o r r e c t i o d f a c t o g i s known. C a l c u l a t i o n s on t h i s base show t h 3 t *cleanm d i s l o c a t i w e l l g i v e a c o n t r a s t i n t h e order o f c = 10- /7/, using b r 10-98cm' as d i s l o c a t i o n capture cross s e c t i o n as given by several authors / 8 , 9 / . Such a s m a l l c o n t r a s t i s undetectable by usual EBIC e l e c t r o n i c s . Consequently the o f t e n observed EBIC c o n t r a s t a t d i s l o c a t i o n s i s not caused by t h e dis- l o c a t i o n centres themselves. Contamination i s necessary t o cause d i s l o c a t i o n s t o appear i n contrast. Assuming t h e contaminatin
i m p u r i t i e s t o be s f f i c i e n t recombination centres w i t h b s= l ~ - ~ ~ c l p ~ (e.g. Au) a l i n e d e n s i t y o f contaminating centres o f = 200 urn-'
would be s u f f i c i e n t t o produce a c o n t r a s t c rr 5 x 10-~! That beans t h a t the existence o f EBIC c o n t r a s t i s a s e n s i t i v e measure f o r dia- l o c a t i o n ( d e f e c t ) contamination.
b f D e t e r m i n a t i o n o f P from p h o t o m e t r i c a l l y o b t a i n e d EBIC c o n t r a s t and from c a l c u l a t e d c o r r e c t i o n f a c t o r s F. I n t h e i d e a l case a f v a l u e i n d e p e n d e n t o f $ , t h e e l e c t r o n p r o b e p o s i t i o n w i t h r e s p e c t t o t h e SF c e n t r e , i s e x p e c t e d , Moreover, I' must b e indepen- d e n t o f E a n d s h o u l d b e e q u a l f o r O b o t h S F b e c a u s e o f i d e n t i c a l p r e - h i s t o r y . T h e s e e x p e c t a t i d n s w e r e s a t i s f a c t o r i l y c o n f i r m e d i n t h e r e g i o n 0 4 p 4 4
-
SF 1, E = 30 kevr
o.P3...0.27-
SF 1, E = 20keVs = 0.83.. .0.29
( i n t h e l o w e r c u r v e s -a- t h e e f f e c t o f t h e c e n t r a l d e f e c t a t SF 1 was t a k e n i n t o a c c o u n t
The d e v i a t i o n s f o r $ > 9
a r e p o s s i b l y c a u s e d by d i s t u r b i n g i n f l u e n c e s o f
o 5 3 10 5 a d j a c e n t d e f e c t s .
b position f $urn)
-
SF 2 , E 30 keV:r
.I0.90...
0.30-
SF 2 , E = 2 0 keV:s
I 0Q8...0.26T h e s e t h e o r e t i c a l r e s u l t s a r e s u p p o r t e d b e x p e r i m e n t a l i n v e s t i - g a t i o n s . F i g . 3 shows s t a c k i n g f a u l t s (SFY i n a n e p i l a y e r which w e r e c h a r a c t e r i z e d b y EBIC a n d HVEM. Some o f t h e d e f e c t s show EBIC recom- b i n a t i o n c o n t r a s t w h e r e a s f o r o t h e r d e f e c t s o n l y t h e SIRTL e t c h e d t o p o g r a p h y is v i s i b l e .
C4-440 JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE
qr
a b
~ i g
.
3-
c o r n p a r a t w e EBIC/HVEM s n v e s t s g a t z o n s o r e p i t a x i a l s t a c k i n g f a u l t sa ) EBIC m i c r o g r a p h : o n l y b ) HVEM m i c r o g r a p h s o f t h e some o f t h e d e f e c t s same a r e a : 1-SHOCKLEY show r e c o m b i n a t i o n con- p a r t i a l s , 2 - s t a i r - r o d t r a s t ( n o t e t h a t d a r k p a r t i a l s , S c o m p l i c a t e d c o n t r a s t i s c a u s e d b y s t r u c t u r e s o f p a r t i a l s ,
t h e bounding p a r t i a l s see /3/
o f t h e SF and n o t by t h e SF p l a n e s )
With W E M t h e c r y s t a l l o g r a p h f c d e t a i l s o f t h e d e f e c t s w e r e s t u d i e d . Mo m d e r o p r s c i p i t a t e s were found a t t h e d e f e c t s .
A Pot o f s a m p l e s o f t h i s k i n d were i n v e s t i g a t e d , c o n t a i n i n g b e s i d e s S F a l s o c o m p l e t e d i s l o c a t i o n s . The r e s u l t s a r e summarized i n t a b l e 1 which i n d i c a t e s f o r e v e r y d e f e c t t y p e t h e number o f i n v e s t i g a t e d d e f e c t s and t h e number o f d e f e c t s showing EBIC c o n t r a s t . Because o f i d e n t i c a l g e o m e t r i c a l c o n d i t i o n s t h e EBIC c o n t r a s t o f t h e d i s l o - c a t i o n s c a n b e compared d i r e c t l y w i t h o u t n e e d f o r c o r r e c t i o n . Accord.
t o t a b l e 2 no s i m p l e r e l a t i o n e x i s t s between t y p e o f d e f e c t a n d EBIC c o n t r a s t . The c o n t r a s t c a n n o t b e c a u s e d p r i m a r i l y b y defect-own c e n t r e s , b e c a u s e d e f e c t s o f t h e same t y p e may show EBIC c o n t r a s t o r n o t . We c o n c l u d e t h e r e f o r e t h a t c o n t r a s t i s c a u s e d by c o n t a m i n a t i o n s f the d i s l o c a t i o n s w i t h r e c o m b i n a t i o n - a c t i v e i m p u r i t i e s . T h i s i s f n c o r r e s p o n d e n c e w i t h a b o v e g i v e n t h e o r e t i c a l r e s u l t s . Consequently, EBIC is u s e f u l f o r s t u d y i n g t h e g e t t e r i n g e f f i c i e n c y o f d i f f e r e n t types of d i s l o c a t d o n a ( d e f e c t s ) .
FWNM p a r e i a L s bounding volume s t a c k i n g f a u l t s a n d c o m p l e t e d i s l o - c a t d a n s w e r e a l s o examined by EBIC and HVEM. T h e r e b y , t h e FRANK p a r t i a l p r o v e d t o b e more e f f e c t i v e i n i n d u c i n g EBIC c o n t r a s t t h a n t h e c o m p l e t e d i s l o c a t i o n . So f a r no e x p l a n a t i o n o f t h i s r e s u l t c a n b e g i v e n . G e n e r a l l y s p e a k i n g , however, t h e c a b a b i l i t y o f g e t t e r i n g , s u p p o s e d h e r e t o c a u s e t h e i n c r e a s i n g d i s t u r b a n c e o f t h e l a t t i c e ( i n c r e a s i n g EBIC c o n t r a s t , seems t o i n r e a s e w i t h /6/ 8 )
.
supposed i n c r e a s e o f g e t t e r i n g c a p a b i l i t y
- I
de f e c t s w i t h EBIC c o n t r a s t
3. D e v i c e e f f e c t s o f d i s l o c a t i o n s
-
Defect i n f l u e n c e s on d e v i c e o p e r a t i o n a r e a w e l l e s t a b l i s h e d f a c t /10,11,12/. The degree t o w h i c h o p e r a t i o n o f a g i v e n d e v i c e may be a f f e c t e d depends on a l o t o f v a r i a b l e s a s k i n d , number, l o c a t i o n o f t h e d e f e c t s , and, l a s t n o t l e a s t , on t h e i r c o n t a m i n a t i o n b y i m p u r i t i e s . T h i s makes c a r e f u l c h a r a c t e r i z a t i o n o f t h e d e f e c t s and t h e i r a c t i o n w i t h i n t h e d e v i c e necessary.P r i n c i p a l l y , two d e f e c t e f f e c t s o f d i f f e r e n t i m p o r t a n c e a r e p o s s i b l e i n p-n j u n c t i o n s : enhanced g e n e r a t i o n / r e c o m b i n a t i o n and l o c a l break- down o f t h e j u n c t i o n (microplasma).
-
1 12 %
F i g . 4
-
Comparison o f EBIC and HVEM micrographs f o r a d e t a i l o f a s o f t d i o d e a) EBIC, r e v e r s e b i a s : 10 Vb ) EBIC, r e v e r s e b i a s : 20 V c ) , d) HVEM
B o t h e f f e c t s a r e demonstrated f o r a r e l a t i v e l y l a r g e (about 4000'urn 2 1
p-n d i o d e s e l e c t e d f o r EBIC i n v e s t i g a t i o n s because o f enhanced /
r e v e r s e c u r r e n t i n t h e pre-breakdown range. F i g . 4 shows d e t a i l s o f t h e d i o d e imaged b y EBIC and HVEM. A t l o w o r z e r o r e v e r s e v o l t a g e s r e c o m b i n a t i o n c o n t r a s t i s found i n t h e edge r e g i o n o f t h e d i o d e , whereas a microplasma becomes v i s i b l e a t s u f f i c i e n t l y h i g h v o l t a g e .
5 55 %
1 2 100 %
C4-442 JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE
The HVEM m i c r o g r a p h r e v e a l s a dense d i s l o c a t i o n c o n f i g u r a t i o n p e n e t r a t i n g t h e m e t a l l u r g i c a l j u n c t i o n i n t h e microplasma r e g i o n . Because no d e c o r a t i o n o f t h e d i s l o c a t i o n s was found t h e recombi- n a t i o n a c t i v i t y a t t h e d e f e c t s i t e and t h e i n f l u e n c e on t h e e l e c t r i - c a l f i e l d d i s t r i b u t i o n i n t h e j u n c t i o n l e a d i n g t o t h e microplasma may be due t o t h e d i s l o c a t i o n s themselves.
On t h e c o n t r a , t h e e f f e c t o f i n d i v i d u a l d i s l o c a t i o n s i n d i o d e s o f such a r e a c a n y e n e g l e c t e d , p r o v i d e d t h e d i s l o c a t i o n i s n o t e x t r e m e l y c o n t a m i n a t e d and does n o t a c t as microplasma. T h i s i s c o n f i r m e d b y an e s t i m a t i o n o f t h e excess t h e r m a l g e n e r a t i o n c u r r e n t caused b y a d i s l o c a t i o n . A p p l y i n g DONOLATO'S c o n t r a s t c a l c u l a t i o n s /5/ and
assuming e q u a l i t y between l i f e t i m e s f o r g e n e r a t i o n and r e c o m b i n e t i o n a t t h e d i s l o c a t i o n , a p r o p o r t i o n a l i t y i s o b t a i n e d between excess t h e r m a l g e n e r a t i o n c u r r e n t and EBIC c o n t r a s t
.
A c c o r d i n g t o t h i s r e l a t i o n d i s l o c a t i o n s w i t h u s u a l EBIC c o n t r a s t a e x p e c t e d t o g i v e excess g e n e r a t i o n c u r r e n t s n o t exceeding t h e IOoB A range, w h i c h i s much t o s m a l l t o make e f f e c t s i n l a r g e s t r u c t u r e s . W i t h r e d u c t i o n o f d e v i c e dimensions, however, i n d i v i d u a l d i s l o c a t i o n s g a i n i n c r e a s i n g i m p o r t a n c e as t h e i r r e l a t i v e c o n t r i b u t i o n t o t h e d i o d e r e v e r s e c u r r e n t i n c r e a s e s.
4. I n t r i n s i c g e t t e r i n
-
D i s l o c a t i o n s may have a l s o b e n e f i c i a l e f f e c t s on d e v i c e p e r rmance because o f t h e i r g e t t e r i n g a c t i o n . D u r i n g i n t r i n s i c g e t t e r i n g f o r i n s t a n c e , n o t t h e S i % p r e c i p i t a t e s b u t t h e secondary d e f e c t s g e n e r a t e d b y t h e p r e c i p i t a t e s (punching l o o p s , bounding p a r t i a l s o f SF) a c t a s t h e main s i n k s f o r m e t a l l i c i m p u r i t i e s .zone 1
F i g c 5
-
EBIC i n v e s t i g a t i o n s on t h e b e v e l o f a sample w h i c h was u n d e r t a k e n an i n t r i n s i c g e t t e r i n g process. The improvement o f t h e e l e c t r i c a l p r o p e r t i e s i n t h e l a y e r a d j a c e n t t o t h e s u r f a c e (zone 1) i s demonst r a t e d.
a ) EBIC m i c r o g r a p h showing downward: d e v i c e
-
zone 1-
zone 2 a-
zone 2b
b ) The energy dependence o f t h e charge c o l l e c t i o n e f f i c i e n c y 9 (E ) g i v e s t h e f o l l o w i n g a p p r o x i m a t e v a l u e s f o r t h e d i f f u s i o n l e n g t h : L 1 u 6.5 um, 2,5/um, Lpb 3,5/um
/
s t a b i l i z a t i o n and improvement o f d e v i c e #erformance (e. g
.
r e d u c t i o n o f l e a k a g e c u r r e n t s ) . I n zone 2a h a v i n g t h e l o w e s t d i f f u s i o n l e n g t h , a n e s p e c i a l l y h i g h d e n s i t y o f SF was found b y e t c h i n g . T h i sr e l a t i o n s h i p may be i n t e r p r e t e d i n t e r m s o f t h e supposed h i g h g e t t e r i n g e f f i c i e n c y o f FRANK p a r t i a l s r e p o r t e d above.
Acknowlegments: The a u t h o r s t h a n k K.-W. S c h r o d e r f o r c a r r y i n g o u t t h e c a l c u l a t i o n s o f c o r r e c t i o n f a c t o r s and 9 (Eo) dependences, t h e I F E H a l l e o f t h e AdVJ d e r DDR f o r e n a b l i n g t h e HVEM i n v e s t i g a t i o n s , and C. D o n o l a t o f o r p e r m i t t i n g r e p r o d u c t i o n o f f i g . l a .
References
/1/ LEAMY, H .J
.
, I<IMERLING , L .C.
and FERRIS, S .D.
, Scanning E l e c t r o n Microscopy, Vol. I, I I T R I , Chicago (1976) 529/2/ KITTLER, M., K r i s t a l l u. T e c h n i k 15 (1980) 575
/3/ KITTLER, M. and BUGIEL, E., C r y s t a l Res. Technol. 17 (1982) 79 /4/ KITTLER, M. and SEIFERT, W., C r y s t a l Res. ~ e c h n o l . 16 (1981)157 /5/ DONOLATO, C* , O p t i k 52 (1978/79) 1 9
/6/ DONOLATO, C. and KLANN, H., 3. Appl. Phys. 51 (1980) 1624 /7/ KITTLER, M. and SEIFERT, W., Phys. S t a t . Sol.(a) (1981) 573 /8/ MAKTWANI, S., DEL PENNINO, U. and MAZZEGA, E., Proc. V. I n t e r -
n a t . Summer S c h o o l Defects, K r y n i c a / P o l a n d (1976) 225
/9/ PATEL, 3.R. and KIMERLING, L.C., 3. Physique 40 (1979) C6-79
/lo/ RAVI, K. V., VARI<ER, C.3. and VOLK, C.E., 3. Electrochem. Soc.
120 (1973) 533
/11/ HOLT, D.B., 3. Physique
-
40 (1979) C6-1891121 HEYDENREICH , J
.
, BLUMTRITT , H.
, GLEICHMANN , R.
and J0HANSEN. H ,3. Physique 40 (1979) C6-23
/13/ RICHTER, H
.
, MA1 , Ma , KIRSCHT , F a-G . and GAWRZEWSKI P Proc. 12. I n t e r n a t . Symp. D e f e c t s i n Semicond., Amsterdam (1982)P h y s i c a 116 B (1983) 162-167