A NNALES DE L ’I. H. P., SECTION A
A. M. B LOKHIN
V. R OMANO
Y U . L. T RAKHININ
Stability of shock waves in relativistic radiation hydrodynamics
Annales de l’I. H. P., section A, tome 67, n
o2 (1997), p. 145-180
<http://www.numdam.org/item?id=AIHPA_1997__67_2_145_0>
© Gauthier-Villars, 1997, tous droits réservés.
L’accès aux archives de la revue « Annales de l’I. H. P., section A » implique l’accord avec les conditions générales d’utilisation (http://www.numdam.
org/conditions). Toute utilisation commerciale ou impression systématique est constitutive d’une infraction pénale. Toute copie ou impression de ce fichier doit contenir la présente mention de copyright.
Article numérisé dans le cadre du programme Numérisation de documents anciens mathématiques
http://www.numdam.org/
145
Stability of shock
wavesin
relativistic radiation hydrodynamics
A. M. BLOKHIN
V. ROMANO
Yu. L. TRAKHININ
Institute of Mathematics, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia.
Politecnico di Bari, sede di Taranto, V. le del Turismo 8, 74100 Taranto, Italia.
Institute of Mathematics, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia.
Vol. 67. n° 2. 1997. Physique théorique
ABSTRACT. - The linear
stability
of shock waves in aradiating
relativistic gas isanalyzed. According
to the ratio between the soundspeed
and gasspeed
behind and ahead the front ofdiscontinuity,
the radiative shocks are classified as slow andfast
shock wavesrespectively.
With thehelp
of thetechnique
ofdissipative
energyintegrals,
it isproved
that the fast shockwaves are stable. An
ill-posedness example
forstability problem
for slowshocks is constructed.
Key words: Relativistic radiation hydrodynamics, variable Eddington factor, stability of
shoch waves.
RESUME. - Nous
analysons
la stabilite lineaire des ondes de choc dansun gaz relativiste radiatif. Les chocs radiatifs sont classifies comme chocs lents et
rapides
selon lerapport
entre la vitesse du son et la vitesse du gaz à 1’ arriere et a l’avant du front de discontinuite. A l’aide de latechnique
desintegrales d’énergie dissipative
on demontre que les ondes de chocrapides
sont stables. On construit aussi un
exemple
malpose
pour leprobleme
dela stabilite des chocs lents.
Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré - Physique théorique - 0246-0211 1 Vol. 67/97/02J~ 7.00/© Gauthier-Villars
146 A. M. BLOKHIN, V. ROMANO AND Yu. L. TRAKHININ
1. INTRODUCTION
Radiation represents the more efficient mechanism for
dissipative
effectsoccuring
in manyproblems
of relativisticastrophysics
andcosmology.
Radiation can be well described
by
means of kinetictheory [ 1 ] .
but such anapproach
is a formidable task even for numerical simulations.We shall follow a
macroscopic description
in the framework of radiationhydrodynamics [2]:
radiation is considered as adissipative
fluid whichobeys
the usual balance law of continuum mechanics. We willadopt
themathematical model for radiation
by
Anile-Pennisi-Sammartino[3], [4]
(hereafter APS),
which is based on ageneralization
to the relativisticcase of the variable
Eddington
factorgiven by
Levermore[5].
The APMmodel is formulated in the framework of the
Extended-Thermodynamics
of irreversible processes
[6], [7]
and leads toequations
ofhyperbolic type (for
other theories whichgive
rise to nonlinearparabolic equations
seeRefs
8, 9).
As
well-known,
the solutions ofhyperbolic
systems candevelope
discontinuities in a finite time
[10], [11] (shock
waves, contactdiscontinuities,
rarefactionwaves).
Inparticular,
shock waves inradiating
gases are of
great importance
in models ofgravitational collapse,
supernovaexplosions,
formation ofquark-gluon plasma.
Stability
of relativistic shock waves insimple
fluids wasinvestigated by
several authors(see
Ref. 12 and referencestherein).
We will followthe method
previously adopted
in[13], [14], [15]
for relativisticsimple
gas,
magnetofluid dynamics
andsuperfluid.
It consists in theapplication
ofthe so-called
technique of dissipative
energyintegrals
to theinvestigation
of the
well-posedness
of mixed linearproblems (Cauchy
andboundary
value
problem).
If the mixedproblem
for thepertubation
of the basic shock solution iswell-posed,
then the shock wave isstable; othewise,
it is unstable.We
classify
the shock waves asfast
and slow ones. It isproved
that fastradiative shocks are stable while for the slow ones a
ill-posed problem
isconstructed. This
imples
in turn theinstabilility
of the secondtype
solutions.One of the most
important
stages of ourapproach
is thesymmetrization
of initial
quasilinear equations
which describe the motion ofradiating
gas in order toapply,
with suitabledevelopments,
thetheory
of mixedproblems
for
symmetric i-hyperbolic
systems(by Friedrichs).
The
problem
ofstability
of strong discontinuities in continuum mechanics hasrecently
assumed aspecial importance
in view of the wideapplication
of
computational
methods to findapproximate
solutions to theproblems
of continuum mechanics with strong discontinuities
(e.g.
see ref. 16 forAnnales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré - Physique théorique
a recent numerical code in radiation
hydrodynamics). Clearly,
apositive
answer on the
question
ofstability
of discontinuities in agiven
model is anessential
preliminary
step for theapplication
ofcomputational
methods.The paper is
organized
as follows. In section 2 we set forth thecomplete
system of Radiation
Hydrodynamics equations
and in sections 3 theproblem
of their
symmetrization
is discussed. In section 4 theproblem
of shock wavestability
ispresented.
Section 5 is devoted to prove thewell-posedness
ofthe mixed
problem
for fast shock waves. The case of slow shocks isinvestigated
in section6,
where the fulfilment of theLopatinsky
conditionsis discussed and an
ill-posed problem
ispresented.
We shall use units such that c = ~ =
1,
with cbeing
thespeed
oflight
in the vacuum.Repeated
indeces are to consider summed and in local coordinates the Greek indices run from 0 to 3 and Latin ones from 1 to3, except
where stated otherwise. Moreover the simbol * indicatestransposition
for matrix.2. THE COMPLETE SYSTEM OF RADIATION HYDRODYNAMICS
EQUATIONS
The relativistic radiation
hydrodynamics equations
of motion arerepresented by
thecontinuity equation
and the balanceequations
for theenergy momentum-tensor of matter and
radiation,
where is the energy momentum tensor of matter and that of radiation.
B7 P
is the covariant derivative withrespect
to the metric g pv of thespace-time,
uP is thefour-velocity
of an observercomoving
withthe fluid.
In usual
problems
in which radiation isimportant
the maindissipative
processes occur due to the
transport
ofphotons,
therefore weneglect viscosity
and heat conduction of gas. Ingeneral
matter and radiation behave like two distinct fluids whose interaction isexpressed through
the sourceterms
f".
Inthermodynamics equilibrium
radiation becomes thermalized and it iscompletely
determinedby
means of the localtemperature
of thegas
(black-body radiation).
VoL 67. n° 2-1997.
148 A. M. BLOKHIN. V. ROMANO AND Yu. L. TRAKHININ
With respect to the normalized
four-velocity
the energy-momentumtensors can be
decomposed
ase and p are the total energy
density
and pressure of gas.By writing
e = with eo
the. specific
internal energy and p thedensity
measured in the frame determined
by
uJ-L andby introducing
thespecific entropy s
and the absolute temperature T of the gas, one can relate eo, p and pby
means of anequation
of stateaccording
to the Gibbs relationon the basis of kinetic
theory
or statistical mechanics. For the moment wedo not restrict ourselves to a
particular equation
of state.J,
HJ1 and KJ11/ are the radiative energy,density,
flux and shear tensor.They satisfy
For thermalized radiation the
expression
of J is obtainedby
thedistribution of Planck
where B is the
black-body
energydensity
and cr the Stefan-Boltzmann constant.In order to close the
system ( 1 )-(3)
one has tospecify
a relation betweenJ,
77~ and KlLv(closure problem), by taking
into accountIf the radiation field is
isotropic,
isgiven by
the classicalEddington approximation
where h 03BD = + u u03BD is the
projection
tensororthogonal
to uu.Levermore
[5]
in the case of static medium has obtained on the basis of kinematic considerations a variableEddington factor,
Annales de l’lnstitut Henri Poincaré - Physique theorique
where 03C61 =
1 - cp,
CP2 ==?’ cP
=03C6(03BB2)=2-4- 3À- A- ==
.We observe that the
physical
range of values for A is 0A~
«1,
thelimiting
casebeing isotropic
radiation and freestreaming respectively.
Lately
APS[2], [3]
have cast theprevious
closure in covariant form and showed that it can be derivedby
means of the entropyprinciple
asformulated in the framework of extended
thermodynamics [6], [7].
The source terms in
(2)-(3),
which model the interactionmatter-radiation,
are the moments of the collision kernel of the
transport equation
forphotons.
Except
Thomsonscattering,
ingeneral
it is notpossible
to express themas
explicit
functions ofJ,
7~ and KJLV[17], [18].
We willadopt
aphenomenological description by
means of a sort of meanabsorption
~,We note that
by using
thecontinuity equation,
the balanceequation
and theGibbs
relation,
thefollowing
additional consevation law holdsThe fluid
flow,
in contrast with asimple
ideal gas, is not adiabatic on account of thedissipative
effects of radiation. The presence of the additional relation(5)
willplay
animportant
role in the next section for thesymmetrization
of balance
equations
for matter.Since the thickness of the shock is almost
always negligible compared
with the characteristic
length
for which curvature isrelevant,
we will workin Minkowski
space-time
A4.Only
forspecial problems
in veryearly
universe we
expect
the inclusion of curvature effects tochange significantly
the results.
Let
(~.~)
be local coordinates in A4. Thenand the
four-velocity
of the fluid hascomponents
where r =
( 1 - V2)-1/2
is the Lorentzfactor, with v2
=Vol. 67, n’ 2-1997.
150 A. M. BLOKHIN. V. ROMANO AND Yu. L. TRAKHININ
Explicitly
eqs(1)-(3)
now readwith h = 1 + eo +
p/ p
the relativistichentalpy.
If the state
equation
is in the formin view of
(4)
we can writeand consider
system (6)-(10)
in the unknown variables vectorwhere
3. SYMMETRIZATION OF BALANCE
EQUATION
Our aim is to
investigate
thestability
of shock wavesarising
from thesystem
( 1 )-(3) by applying
the energy method. One of the most fruitfull wayAnnales de rlnstitut Henri Poincaré - Physique theoriquz
to
employ
that method is to rewrite the balanceequations
in asymmetric
form. We recall that a system of the type
is said
symmetric
if80 and Bi
aresymmetric
matrices. Further if80
is
positive
definite then the system is saidsymmetric t-hyperbolic by
Friedrichs. We shall
symmetrize
the balanceequation
for matter andradiation
saparately
with different methods.3.1.
Symmetrization
of the balanceequations
for mediumSince for gas the additional law
holds we can use the
procedure suggested
in Refs19, 20, 21, 22,
23. The basic ideas are thefollowing.
If
is a
system
of balanceequations
such that thesupplementary
relationis satisfied
by
each solution of(11),
then a new set ofdependent
variablesQ
= ...,qn)
can be introducedby
means of the relationwith - standard scalar
product
inR3. Setting
the system
(2)
can be rewritten in asymmetrical
form aswhere
with
aQ
=£qiqj
and67, n ‘ 2-1997.
152 A. M. BLOKHIN. V. ROMANO AND Yu. L. TRAKHININ
The calculation can be
simplified by introducing
the matrices and> with the aid of the relations
[13], [14], [15]
where
Then
In the present case we find the
following
canonical variablesand
productive
functionIt is easy to
verify
in theparticular
caseu2
=u3
= 0(which
will beconsidered in the
following,
even ifthe
same result holds ingeneral)
that2014~4~>0if
thefollowing inequalities
takeplace
where
Annales de rlnstitut Henri Poincaré - Physique theorique
It is easy to show
that,
as in classical GasDynamics, inequalities ( 12)
arefulfilled if the state
equation
eo =eo ( p, s)
satisfies thefollowing inequalities
which express
causality (sound speed
smaller than thevelocity
oflight)
and
convessity
of the relativistic freeentalpy:
Note
(see
Ref.15)
that system(2)
can be rewritten aswhere in the
particular
caseu2
=U 3
= 0F = -7*F. It is easy to see that the matrices
are
symmetric
andB(°)
> 0 > 0 andinequalities ( 13)
fulfilled.Consequently
system(14)
is alsosymmetric t-hyperbolic (by Friedrichs).
VoL67,n° 2-1997.
154 A. M. BLOKHIN. V. ROMANO AND Yu. L. TRAKHININ
3.2.
Symmetrization
of radiationequation
In this subsection we discuss the
topic
ofsymmetrization
of radiationequations (3).
With this purpose weadopt
the same idea used in refs3,4
and based on the
procedure
of extendedthermodynamics [6].
We want toimpose
the entropyprinciple
on system(3),
i.e. we assume that there arefunctions 4l" =
4l" (W), g
=g (W )
and canonic variables(or Lagrange Multipliers )
r 0: =r 0: (W")
such that the relationholds for every smooth solution of
system (1)-(3).
HereWe define the
productive functions L, Mt~> ,
k =1, 2,
3:By using
the theorem ofrepresentation
formulas for tensor-valuedisotropic
function
[24],
we seek theproductive functions
in the formwhere
Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré - Physique théorique
From
(15)
deriveTo compare
expressions (15)
withexpressions (3),
we introduce therepresentation
for HO:where
Co, d
are relatedby
and
satisfy
the conditionsSubstituting
theexpressions (16)
into(3)
andcomparing
the obtainedexpression
with(15),
one hasactually,
the lastexpression
is anidentity (for
thegiven expression
of Coand
c.p). Using
relation(16)2
and(17)i 2,
we have the differentialequation
for unknown function £:
67. n 2- 1997.
156 A. M. BLOKHIN. V. ROMANO AND Yu. L. TRAKHININ
its solution is
Since
we have that
wherefrom
, ’ .
By
means of theprevious relations,
we obtainConsequently
system(3)
can be rewritten in the canonic formHere
Anrtales de l’Institzst Henri Poincare - Physique théorique
Considering
the casewe have
where
It is easy to
verify
that in theparticular
caseU2 = ~c3
=0, 7~
=0,
k =
1; 2. 3
the matrix >0, i. e.,
system(17)
issymmetric t-hyperbolic (by Friedrichs).
Moreover,
we have forsystem (6)-(10)
theentropy
relationwhich holds for every smooth solution of
system (6)-( 10).
VoL 67, n 2-1997.
158 A. M. BLOKHIN. V. ROMANO AND Yu. L. TRAKHININ
4. SHOCK WAVES IN RELATIVISTIC RADIATION HYDRODYNAMICS: THE STABILITY PROBLEM
A shock wave is an oriented
hypersurface £
inspace-time,
across whichthe field variables suffer
a jump discontinuity,
i. e. the tensor fieldsgoverning
the motion are
regularly
discontinuous[12].
We will be deal with shocks between two
equilibrium
states. In such acase radiation is
completely
thermalized and radiative stress-energy tensoris, then, given
in the smoothnessregions by
The mathematical
properties
of shocks for relativisticradiating
gas were discussed in Ref.25,
where it wasproved
that under theassumption ( 13)
onthe
equation
of state thejump
conditions admit aunique
solutionsatisfying
the entropy
inequality. Moreover,
it was shown that theipersurface E
isspace-like. Therefore,
if ~ is describedby
theequation
we can introduce the
unitary space-like
four vectorand the conditions
must hold on E for the system
( 1 )-(3)
where for everyregularly
discontinuous function
f is [ f]
=f- - f+,
thesubscripts
+, - denote the value of the function ahead and behind the shockfront, respectively.
We assume the undisturbed shock to be
stationary. Then,
one can choosethe local coordinates
(t. adapted
to the shock front. Inparticular,
thelocal chart can be taken such that the
equation ~ 1
= 0represents locally
thehypersuface
~. The shock wave will begiven by
astep-wise
function withdifferent constant value for for each t in the two
region x~
0and x >
0.We will
investigate
thestability
of the solution under small disturbances(linear stability).
Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincare - Physique théorique
The indisturbed state has the
following
form:when x1
0:when x1
> 0:We assume that at
x~ = 0
conditions(20)-(21)
hold on thediscontinuity
surface
Vo!.67,B° 2-1997.
160 A. M. BLOKHIN, V. ROMANO AND Yu. L. TRAKHININ
and
require
the fulfilment of the necessary conditions:Let us consider a small
pertubation
of theprevious
solution and denoteby
the matrices andArad
for U = U and so on. Let us linearize the
system (14)-(18)
around theindisturbed state. In order to
simplify
the notation we indicateagain
thepertubation
of the matter and radiative variables with the vectors U and W.The
stability
isinvestigated by studying
thewell-posedness
of thefollowing
mixedproblem
withmoving boundary
conditions.MAIN PROBLEM I. - To find
piece-wise
smooth solution which satisfiesthe
boundary
conditions:Annales de I ’Institut Henri Poincaré - Physique théorique
for t > 0 and x’ E
R2 , x 1
=0;
and the initial datafor t = 0.
Here
xl
=F(t, x’)
is a smalldisplacement
of thediscontinuity front,
By performing
thefollowing change
ofcoordinates,
which isregular
forsufficiently
small values ofF (t, x’ ),
we reduce the
problem
to aproblem
with fixedboundary
conditions.Necessary
conditions for thestability
of shock waves are thegeometrical
Lax conditions
(see
Ref. 10 for areview),
which assure that theproblem
isVoL 67, n° 2-1997.
162 A. M. BLOKHIN. V. ROMANO AND Yu. L. TRAKHININ
well formulated with respect to the number of
boundary
conditions. Shock solutionssatisfying
the Lax conditions are saidevolutionary.
We observe that the matrix
where values:
has the
following eigen-
and if
VI
>cs,
thenA~
>0, j = 1, 5;
ifVI cs,
thenÀI,2,3,4
>0, ~~
0.The matrix has the
following eigen-values:
and >
0, ~2
0 if3(vl)2 1,
and~1,2,3,4
> 0 if3(vl)?
> 1.Therefore,
one hasevolutionary
shocks whenor when
We call the last two
type
of discontinuous solutions asfast
and slow shockwaves
respectively.
In the next sections thestability properties
will bestudied for both the type of
evolutionary
shocks.Annales de l’lnstitut Henri Poincaré - Physique théorique
We observe that fast shocks can occour
only
in veryspecial situations,
as in
early universe,
because it isrequired
that the soundspeed
of gas isgreater
than that of radiation. Anexample
can be abarotropic
fluid withequation
of state ewith
= 1(stiff matter),
considered in severalcosmologial
models.The slow shock waves include almost all the
cases
of interest for radiativephenomena
inastrophysics
orlaboratory experiments.
5. WELL-POSEDNESS OF STABILITY PROBLEM FOR FAST SHOCKS
By
virtue of the firstinequality
from(37),
the matrix has fivepositive eigen-values,
and the matrix has fourpositive eigenvalues. Consequently system (32), (33)
does not need theboundary
conditions for
xl
= 0 and its solutions in this case iscompletely
determinedby
initial data forx1
0. Without loss ofgenerality
we presume thatW(t, x) -
0 forx1
0(see
also Refs13, 14).
We can turn the
stability problem
for fast shock waves into theproof
ofthe
well-posedness
of thefollowing problem.
MAIN PROBLEM II. - We seek a solution to the
system
ofequations (30), (31)
which satisfies theboundary
conditionsfor t > 0 and x’ E
1~2 ~ x 1
= 0 and the initial datafor t = 0. The coefficients
d, A, v
are described above.Vol. 67, n° 2-1997.
164 A. M. BLOKHIN, V. ROMANO AND Yu. L. TRAKHININ
As in Gas
Dynamics (see
Ref.14),
we can derive thefollowing boundary
condition 0 for Main
problem
IIwhere
with
po
=r/3, p 1
=Cs j52
=03B22 = c2s - (A1)2
while thecoefficients
ak, k
=1, 2, 3
can be determined fromboundary
conditions(41 ), (42).
We will obtain the so-called a
priori
estimation without lossofsmoothness
for Main
problem
II. This allows us,by using
standardtechniques (see
forexample
Ref.27),
to prove thewell-posedness
of Main Problem II and in turn to achieve the fast shock wavesstability
in RadiationHydrodynamics.
The basic idea used is to consider besides the eqs
(30)-(31 )
also anotherproblem
withdissipative boundary
condition atxl
= 0.By taking
a suitablelinear combination of the two systems we obtain an
expanded
system which has alsodissipative boundary
conditions. This allows us toget
the desidereda
priori
estimate for Mainproblem
II. The construction process of theexpanded
system consists of two stages.Firstly
from thesystem
we construct the
following symmetric t-hyperbolic (by Friedrichs)
system:Here
Annales de l’lnstitut Henri Poincaré - Physique theorique
Q is the square matrix such that
=
diag(h x A, E(ho x Aa)),
a =0, 3, ~p
=diag(IsxO,E(I1oxO))
areblock-diagonal matrices, I5 x Aa
is the Kroneckerproduct
of the matrices~5
andAD:, ~5
is the unit matrix of order 5 etc.; E is apositive
constant.Writing
the energyintegral
in differential form for thesymmetric system (45)
andintegrating
it over the domainR~,
we obtainwhere
etc. In order to deduce eq.
(46),
we have assumedVp
to be squareintegrable
in
~. Therefore
whenor
Estimating
the second and the third term inequality (46)
with thehelp
of
boundary
conditions(41), (42)
andsystem (14),
we obtain theinequality
where
Ml . M2
> 0 are constants;From
boundary
conditions(42)
andsystem (30) (31 ) at Xl
= 0 we deduceVol. 67. n° 2-1997.
166 A. M. BLOKHIN, V. ROMANO AND Yu. L. TRAKHININ
where
/3i~,
~0.1.2 are constants.Using
theinequality [29]
thatand the
property
of the trace of a function in on theplane z~
= 0(see
Ref.29),
we transforminequality (47)
to thefollowing
form:where
Mi, M2
> 0 are constants.Now we
proceed
to the second morecomplicated stage consisting
in theconstruction of the
expanded system.
SinceVI c~
we observe that P satisfies the waveequation
with
Then the vector
satisfies the
symmetric system [13]
Annales de l’lnstitut Henri Poincaré - Physique théorique
where
~1~2 13
are some constants, and E > 0 if 1+ l2
+l3 ;
We rewrite
boundary
conditions(44)
in the form:where
The constants a, a2 are derived from the
system
Solving
thissystem,
wechoose,
forexample,
the number a as follows:In
general,
the number a iscomplex (if ~ 2014
4mn >0,
then a isreal).
Therefore,
the function L P is acomplex
function and the vectoris a
complex
vector which satisfies asymmetric t-hyperbolic (by Friedrichs)
system:where
Ep, Qp, R2p, R3p
areblock-diagonal
matrices of order20,
168 A. M. BLOKHIN, V. ROMANO AND Yu. L. TRAKHININ
We choose
.... n " I I ,
a5 is an
arbitrary positive
number. Thanks to thischoice,
we obtainwhere
kij,
i =1,4, j
=2, 3, k5, M3,4
arepositive
constants; El > 0 isa constant such that
We write out the energy
integral
in the differential form for system(50):
Here
Dp
= It is easy toverify
thatDp
> 0. Weintegrate equality (52)
over the domainR+ assuming again that IVpl
is squareintegrable
inR+
andtherefore 1-+0
whetheror x ~ ~ 3 ~ -~ x .
Asa
result,
in view of(50),
with thehelp
of theproperty
of function tracefrom
W.; (R§ )
on theplane ~ 1
=0,
we obtain thefollowing inequality:
Annales de l’lnstitut Henri Poincaré - Physique theorique
where
-B[5
=M4)
>0, M6
> 0 are constantsdependent
on 61.Adding inequality (49)
toinequality (53)
andconsidering
that under anappropriate
choice of the constant E thequadratic
formis
positive definite,
we obtain theinequality:
where
J2 (t)
=Jo(t)
+M7
> 0 is a constant. The lastinequality implies
the desired apriori
estimation for Mainproblem
II:Thus,
from(54)
we conclude that the estimationholds for Main
problem
II. HereM8
oo is apositive
constantdependent
on T.
Note that for the function
F(t, x’)
the estimationmay be obtained
(Mg
oo is apositive
constantdependent
onT).
From estimations
(54), (55)
it follows(see 27)
that Mainproblem
II iswell-posed
for m, n > 0 and thisimplies
thefast
shock waves are stable.6. INSTABILITY OF SLOW SHOCK WAVES Now the slow shocks will be studied.
By
virtue of(39),
the matrix has fivepositive eigen-values,
and the matrix
(W~ )
has threepositive eigen-values
and onenegative eigen-value.
At the sametime,
as a consequence of(40),
the matrixB1(U)
has four
positive eigen-values
and the matrix has threepositive
Vol. 67, n 2-1997.
170 A. M. BLOKHIN, V. ROMANOAND Yu. L. TRAKHININ
eigen-values,
i. e. , atx 1
= 0 it is necessary to set upeight boundary
conditions for systems
(30), (31 )
and(32), (33) plus
a condition to determinethe function
F(t, x’).
The
study
ofstability
for slow radiative shockcorresponds
to theanalysis
of the
well-posedness
of Main Problem I under the conditions(39)-(40).
Applying
the sametechnique
to the case of slow shock waves,omitting details,
we conclude that if theinequality.
holds,
then theboundary
conditions of thecorresponding expanded
systemare
dissipative. However, by
virtue of(39), (40)
it is not difficult to seethat condition
(56)
is not fulfilled.Indeed,
we shallshow, by following
theRef.
30,
that it ispossible
to constructill-posed examples
ofHadamard-type
for slow shock waves, that is a sequence of solutions of the form
where the matrices A and
Aoo
and the constantsP, v 00, ~~
will bedescribed below and the constants ci will not be all zero and determined
by
theboundary
conditions.In order to
simplify
the calculations we rewritesystem (2)-(3)
aswhere
, ,
Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré - Physique théorique
Qrad
arequadratic
matrices andDmat, Drad
arerectangular
matricessuch that
Applying
theFourier-Laplace
transform to the Main ProblemI,
we obtain thefollowing boundary
valueproblem
for thesystem
ofordinary
differentialequations:
Here
Vo!.67,n° 2-1997.
172 A. M. BLOKHIN, V. ROMANO AND Yu. L. TRAKHININ
While
applying
theFourier-Laplace transform,
we assume thatV(t. x)
= 0for t 0.
Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré - Physique théorique
Let
Then
Further let n » 1. We can
expand
the valuesyy, ~, ~2,3,
the elements of matrices etc. as a power series in the smallparameter n
because the element of the matricesM, M~
areanalytic
functions:etc. Then we have:
where
Vol. 67, n° 2-1997.
174 A. M. BLOKHIN, V. ROMANO AND Yu. L. TRAKHININ
for 7~ = = 0
(it
is also not difficult to write out the matrix A for this case and for the casewhen T/2 + ç2 -f- cv2
= 0 or77~ + ç2 -~ c,v3
=0).
HereReB > 0 and the
eigen-values
of the matrixQ
liestrictly
in the leftsemi-plane (ReAj(Q) 0).
The
explicit
form of the matricesQo, Ao
and theparameter Bo
arenot relevant. We
report only
thatReBo
> 0 and theeigen-values
of thematrix
Qo
liestrictly
in the leftsemi-plane. Nk,
k =1,6
are the matrices with elements of order0(~-).
It is not difficult to write out theanalogous
representation
for the matrixThe
eigen-values
of the matrix liestrictly
in the left semi-plane ; 14
is the unit matrix of order5; Nk, k
==7, 10
are the matrices with elements of order0(~-).
We have the
following
relations for constantsck, k
=1, 9:
Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré - Physique théorique
The last
equation
hasonly
the trivial solutions ifwhere
Here
It is also not difficult to write out the matrix L for the cases:
1). ~ ç = 0; 2).
7? = = 0.One says that the
boundary
conditions(34), (35)
of Main Problemsatisfy
the
Lopatinsky
condition ifrequirement (62)
is fulfilled forall ~
>0,
(I, L)
ER3.
This means thatexponentially growing
solutions do not exist for theproblem
under consideration. Let us prove that theLopatinsky
condition is not fulfilled.
We consider the
equality
as a relation which must be satisfied
by
the values7}, ~, (~2,3.
We show thatthere
exist fi
>0, (~, cv)
ER
such thatequality (6.5)
is fulfilled. Asproved
in the
Appendix,
there exist 7yo >0,~o.
Wo =(~~3) (~70
+Ç5 + 2
=1,
~~.3
>0)
such that detL(s~°},
=0, i.e., [0
= det£(0)
= 0.Vol. 67, n° 2-1997.
176 A. M. BLOKHIN. V. ROMANO AND Yu. L. TRAKHININ
We choose
~~°~
=1(°)
=0, ~~) = (~, 0)
=0)
and the valuess~~>, ~,y 3, ~;
=1.2.3...
as roots of thecorresponding
relations:Thus,
forthe
Lopatinsky
determinant det L isequal
to zero.Consequently, boundary
conditions
(34), (35)
do notsatisfy
theLopatinsky
condition.The last fact allows us to write out the
ill-posedness example
of Hada-mard
type
for Mainproblem:
with the
eigenvalues
of the matricesQr
in the leftsemi-plane
andReBr~
> 0(Brx;
=0(; )).
For theprevious
solutions it is notpossible
to determine a uniform bound for t > 0 and therefore we haveproved
theinstability of
slow shock waves.Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré - Physique théorique
7.
CONCLUSIONS
The
present analysis
reveals substantial differences between fast and slow shocks in radiationhydrodynamics. However,
the obtained results have arather clear
physical meaning.
Even if the shocks are treated as
discontinuities, they
arereally represented by
thinregion
where the field variables havestrong gradients.
The thickness of those
regions
is of the order of the mean freepath
of thefluid
(a
mixture in ourcase).
For veryhigh temperatures (e.g.
ultrarelativisticlimit)
the soundspeed
of matter tends to radiative one. As a conseguence, the characteristic velocities of matter and radiation are of the same order.For slow gas at
relatively
lowtemperature
matter and radiation behavequite differently.
Forexample
if thetemperature
is10~ - 105
K the meanfree
path
ofphotons
is of the order of10-2 - 10-1
cm, while that of gasparticles
is of the order of10-5
cm. Since the viscousexchange
zones aredetermined
by
thelonger
mean freepath,
one can considerpratically
thegas shock embedded in the radiative one. In fact in newtonian
problems,
inthe
analysis
of shock strucure forradiating
gascontinuity
isrequired
for theradiative variables and
jumps
are allowedonly
for the matter fields[31 ] .
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
We
gratefully
thankprof.
A. M. Anile for manyhelpful
discussions andenlightening
conversations.This work was
partially supported by
M.U.R.S.T.This work was
partially
writtenduring
thefellowship
of one of theauthors
(V.R.)
at C.N.R.(G.N.F.M.).
APPENDIX
PROOF OF THE EXISTENCE OF THE ROOT OF THE LOPATINSKY DETERMINANT
.
Here we prove that there exist >
0, ~
Cùo =Cùg) (’l}õ+Ç-õ+ICùo 12 =1,
~2.3
>0)
such thatç, w)
= detL(s~°~ ,
= O. LetVol. 67. n ’ 2-1997.
178 A. M. BLOKHIN, V. ROMANO AND Yu. L. TRAKHININ
Then we have
where is a real-valued function.
Let us show that the
equality
has roots such that
On one hand we have
(see (39)-(40)).
On the other handwhere
It is
straightforward
toverify
Then
Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré - Physique théorique
Thus B > 0 and we have:
This
implies
that there exist 0 ?7o1,
=(@£, 0),
01, fio
== 0 such thatIt remains to show that
It is easy to see that
Therefore conditions
(Al)
hold. Thiscompletes
theproof.
REFERENCES
[1] S. R. de GROOT, W. A. VAN LEEUWEN and Ch. G. VAN WEERT, Relativistic Kinetic Theory, North-Holland, 1980.
[2] D. MIHALAS and B. W. MIHALAS, Foundation of Radiation Hydrodynamics, Oxford University Press, 1984.
[3] A. M. ANILE, S. PENNISI and M. SAMMARTINO, A thermodynamical approach to Eddington factors, J. Math. Phys., Vol. 32, 1991, pp. 544-550.
[4] A. M. ANILE, S. PENNISI and M. SAMMARTINO, Covariant radiation hydrodynamics,
Ann. Inst. H. Poin., Vol. 56, 1992, pp. 49-74.
[5] C. D. LEVERMORE, Relating Eddington factors to flux-limiters, J.Q.S.R.T, Vol. 31, 1984, pp. 149-160.
[6] I. MÚLLER and T. RUGGERI, Extended Thermodynamics, Springer, Berlin, 1993.
[7] D. Jou, J. CASAS-VÁZQUEZ and G. LEBON, Extended Irreversible Thermodynamics, Springer, Berlin, 1993.
[8] A. M. ANILE and V. ROMANO, Covariant flux-limited diffusion theories, Astrophys. J.,
Vol. 386, 1992, pp. 325-329.
[9] A. BONANNO and V. ROMANO, Covariant flux-limited diffusion theory for an anisotropic
source term, Astrophys. J., Vol. 404, 1993, pp. 264-267.
[10] A. JEFFREY, Quasilinear Hyperbolic Systems and Waves, Pitman, New York, 1976.
[11] L. D. LANDAU and E. M. LIFSHITZ, Fluid Mechanics, Pergamon Press, London, 1959.
[12] A. M. ANILE, Relativistic Fluids and Magneto-Fluids, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1989.
[13] A. M. BLOKHIN, Energy integrals and their applications to gas dynamics problems, Nauka, Novosibirsk, 1986.
[14] A. M. BLOKHIN, Strong Discontinuities in Magnetohydrodynamics, Nova Science Publishers, New York, 1993.
[15] A. M. BLOKHIN and E. V. MISHCHENKO, Investigation on shock waves stability in relativistic gas dynamics, Le Matematiche, Vol. 48, 1993, pp. 53-75.
Vol.67,n° 2-1997.