Publisher’s version / Version de l'éditeur:
Vous avez des questions? Nous pouvons vous aider. Pour communiquer directement avec un auteur, consultez la première page de la revue dans laquelle son article a été publié afin de trouver ses coordonnées. Si vous n’arrivez pas à les repérer, communiquez avec nous à PublicationsArchive-ArchivesPublications@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca.
Questions? Contact the NRC Publications Archive team at
PublicationsArchive-ArchivesPublications@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca. If you wish to email the authors directly, please see the first page of the publication for their contact information.
https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/droits
L’accès à ce site Web et l’utilisation de son contenu sont assujettis aux conditions présentées dans le site LISEZ CES CONDITIONS ATTENTIVEMENT AVANT D’UTILISER CE SITE WEB.
Internal Report (National Research Council of Canada. Division of Building Research), 1961-03-01
READ THESE TERMS AND CONDITIONS CAREFULLY BEFORE USING THIS WEBSITE.
https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/copyright
NRC Publications Archive Record / Notice des Archives des publications du CNRC :
https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/view/object/?id=7158cceb-0c19-45fa-83e9-27cc48b89d96 https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/voir/objet/?id=7158cceb-0c19-45fa-83e9-27cc48b89d96
NRC Publications Archive
Archives des publications du CNRC
For the publisher’s version, please access the DOI link below./ Pour consulter la version de l’éditeur, utilisez le lien DOI ci-dessous.
https://doi.org/10.4224/20338071
Access and use of this website and the material on it are subject to the Terms and Conditions set forth at
Effects of freezing brick masonry at an early age
N A T I O N A L R72SEARCH C O U N C I L CANADA
D I V I S I O N OF
BUILDING
HXSEARCHEFFXCTS OF
FREEZING
B R I C K MASONRY AT AN EARLY AGI;: by T. R i t c h i e and P. T. Hodgins I n t e r n a l Report No. 213 of t h e D i v i s i o n of B u i l d i n g Research Ottawa March 1961The promotion of w i n t e r c o n s t r u c t i o n i n Canada a s a n a i d i n r e d u c i n g w i n t e r unemployment i n t h e c o n s t r u c t i o n i n d u s t r y h a s l e d t o a need f o r a r e a s s e s s m e n t of t h e c o l d ?weather p r o t e c t i o n r e q u i r e d d u r i n g t h e l a y i 3 g of masonry. The I l i v i s i o n , r e c o g n i z i n g t h i s n e e d , h a s c o n s t r u c t e d a c o l d room and h a s i n i t i a t e d a prosram of s t u d y of t h e e f f e c - t s of f r e e z i n g , u n d e r v a r i o u s c o n d i t i o n s , upon newly l a i d b r i c k
Inn 5 onry.
.F. T. Hodgins, t h e second a u t h o r , and a r e s e a r c h o f f i c e r w i t h t h e B u i l d i n g M a t e r i a l s S e c t i o n , was i n c h a r g e of t h e f i r s t phase of t h e s t u d y . T h i s r e p o r t of t h e work which was c a r r i e d o u t by M r . Hodgins b e f o r e he l e f t t h e D i v i s i o n t o t a k e u p o t h e r d u t i e s , h a s been p r e p a r e d by 1:vl.r. R i t c h i e , a ceramic e n g i n e e r and a r e s e a r c h o f f i c e r w i t h t h e D t v i s i o n . rho
h a s been engaged f o r many y e a r s i n s t u d i e s of b r i c k masonry. The r e s u l t s r e p o r t e d a r e p r e l i m i n a r y o n l y , s i n c e it; has n o t y e t been p o s s i b l e t o resu1.w work on t h e p r o j e c t .
Ottawa B.
Il.
HutcheonBy T . R i t c h i e and P. T. Hodgins
B u i l d i n g c o n s t r u c t i o n i n Canada i s c a r r i e d o u t y e a r - round, a l t h o u g h t h e r e i s u s u a l l y a s l a c k e n i n g of a c t i v i t y i n t h e w i n t z r s e a s o n . l)u.rin,q; p e r i o d s of s e v e r e cold., some t y p e s of work mag be c o m p l e t e l y stopped u n l e s s p r o t e c t i o n i s provided f o r t h e work o r t h e workers o r b o t h . I n many c i t i e s ( f o r example, Ot-taws ) b r i c k l a y i n g h a s been c a r r i e d o u t i n a i r t e m p e r a t u r e s
w e l l below f r e e z i n g w i t h o u t p r o - t e c t i o n t o t h e work. The l i m i t i n g c o n s i d e r a t i o n i n many c a s e s a p p e a r s t o be t h e c a p a c i t y of t h e b r i c k l a y e r s t o work i n s e v e r e l y c o l d c o n d i t i o n s , r a t h e r t h a n p o s s i b l e impairment of t h e q u a l i t y of -the work.
To p r e v e n t r e d u c t i o n i n t h e q u a l - i t y of masonry due t o f r e e z i n g a t a n e a r l y a g e , many s p e c i f i c a t i o n s and codes of p r a c t i c e f o r b r i c k masonry c o n s t r u c t i o n r e q u i r e t h a t t h e
t e m p e r a t u r e of t h e masonry be maintained above f r e e z i n g f o r some time ( u s u a l l y a t l e a s t 4 8 h o u r s ) a f t e r t h e briclo?rorlr i s
c o n s t n ~ c t e d t o permit it t o a c h i e v e r e s i s t a n c e t o damage b e f o r e b e i n g f r o z e n . hlan;~ c o n t r i ~ c t o r s however, have n o t e d t h a t briclc masonry which had been c o n s t r u c t e d w i t h o u t p r o t e c t i o n i n v e r y cold weather a p p a r e n t l y h a s performed s a t i s f a c t o r i l y . The need f o r t h e r e q u i r e m e n t s s e t o u t i n s p e c i f i c a t i o n s r e g a r d i n g
p r o t e c t i o n t o t h e masonry d u r i n g c o n s t r u c t i o n i n f r e e z i n g weather h a s t h e r e f o r e been q u e s t i o n e d , and it seems i m p o r t a n t t o d e t e r m i n e how t h e p r o p e r t i e s of b r i c k masonry construe-Led imcier f r e e z i n g c o n d i t i o n s d i f f e r from t h o s e of s i m i l a r masonry c o n s t r u c t e d under normal ( i . e . summer) c o n d i t i o n s .
P r e l i m i n a r y l a b o r a t o r y s t u d i e s of t h i s problem were u n d e r t a k e n i n t h e D i v i s i o n of B u i l d i n g Research i n 1958. I t
was t h e n planned t o s t u d y s m a l l p a n e l s of b r i c k masonry t o d e t e r m i n e t h e e f f e c t on v a r i o u s p r o p e r t i e s of f r e e z i n g a t a n e a r l y age. The p r o p e r t i e s t o be s t u d i e d ?vere r e s i s t a n c e t o m o i s t u r e p e n e t r a t i c n , s t r e n g t h of bond between b r i c k and m o r t a r , and d i m e n s i o n a l changes i n t h e b r i c k ~ o r k . I t was o r i g i n a l l y planned t h a t p a n e l s made of s e v e r a l t y p e s of b r i c k s and s e v e r a l m o r t a r compositions would be s t u d i e d . The b r i c k s were t o be chosen t o c o v e r a wide range of i n i t i a l r a t e of a b s o r p t i o n , o r " s u c t i o n 1 ' , which i s a n i m p o r t a n t p r o p e r t y w i t h r e s p e c t t o t h e bonding between b r i c k and m o r t a r . The f i r s t p a r t of t h e s t u d y i n v o l v e d t h e c o n s t r u c t i o n of p a n e l s u s i n g a l o w - s u c t i o n b r i c k and a v a r i e t y of m o r t a r s . ':hen t h i s p a r t of t h e lnrork was
completed, however, t h e r e s e a r c h o f f i c e r s u p e r v i s i n g t h e s t u d y l e f t t h e D i v i s i o n f o r o t h e r d u t i e s , w i t h t h e r e s u l t t h a t t h e program o r i g i n a l l y planned h a s n o t y e t been completed. The r e s u l t s p r e s e n t e d i n t h i s r e p o r t t h e r e f o r e r e f e r o n l y t o t h e p a r t i c u l a r l o w - s u c t i o n b r i c k u s e d , and it i s c o n s i d e r e d l i k e l y t h a t d i f f e r e n t r e s u l t s w i l l be o b t a i n e d when o t h e r t y p e s of b r i c k s a r e employed.
The p i ~ n e l s c o n s i s t e d of f i v e b r i c k s l a i d one nbovc t h e o t h c r r v i t 3 1 m o r t a r j o i n t s between, asssmbl-ed and t e s t e d f o r m o i s t u r e p e r l c t r a t i o n and bond s t r e n g t h p r o p e r t i e s a s
d c s c r t b e c i i n 1)BR I n t e r n a l R e p o r t s Nos. 1 6 0 and 115 ( 1 , 2 ) . The t i m e i n t e r v : ~ l b e t w e e n pl3c;ine t h e m o r t a r on t h e s u r f a c e of t h e b r i c k and t h e n p l a c i n g t h e n e x t b r i c k on it was s e t a t 30 s e c o n d s , and a t a p p i n g i m p a c t o f 4 pounds d r o p p i n g t h r o u z h
14
i n c h e s was u s e d t o bed t h e bri-clc i n t h e m o r t a r . The t o p and bottom b r i c k s o f e a c h p a n e l , p r i o r t o p a n e l c o n s t r u c t i o n , were f i t t e dw i t h b r a s s p i n s u s e d t o measure c h a n g e s i n t h e p a n e l h e i g h t .
A m i c r o m e t e r head which gave r e a d i n g s t o 0.0001 i n c h was used f o r m e a s u r i n g t h e d i m e n s i o n a l c h a n g e s .
CONDITIONS OF CONSTRUCTION
P a n e l s were assembled u n d e r t h r e e c o n d i t i o n s : ( a ) The b r i c k s a n d t h e f r e s h l y mixed m o r t a r , b o t h a t a t e m p e r a t u r e of 73OP, were a s s e m b l e d i n t o p a n e l s i n a room a t 73OP, and remained a t t h a t t e m p e r a t u r e u n t i l t e s t e d .
( b ) S r i c k s a n d f r e s h l y mixed m o r t a r , b o t h a t a
t e m p e r a t u r e of 73OF were t a k c n i n t o a c o l d room m a i n t a i n e d a t Oo.F and i m m e d i a t e l y made i n t o p a n e l s .
( c ) _Freshly mixed m o r t a r a t a t e m p e r a t u r e of '7T°F
and b r i c k s ? t a t e m p e r a t u r e of OOP were assembled i n t o p a n e l s i n a c o l d room m a i n t a i n e d a t OoP. The second s i t u a t i o n ( b ) was i n t e n d e d t o c o r r e s p o n d t o t h e p r a c t i c e o f p r o v i d i n g h e a t e d b r i c k s a n d m o r t a r t o t h e b r i c k l a y e r ; t h e b r i c b ~ o r k a f t e r c o n s t r u c t i o n w a s u n p r o t e c t e d and c o o l e d below t h e f r e e z i n g p o i n t . The t h i r d c o n d i t i o n ( c ) was i n t e n d e d t o c o r r e s p o n d t o t h e p r a c t i c e o f u s i n g w s r m m o r t a r w i t h c o l d b r i c k s and t h e masonry l e f t u n p r o t e c t e d and c o o l e d below t h e f r e e z i n g p o i n t . The d i f f e r e n c e between c o n d i t i o n s
( b ) and ( c ) i.s e s s e n t i a l l y
i n
t h e r a t e o f F r e e z i n g o f t h e m o r t a r ; t h e warm b r i c k o f concli-tion ( b ) would produce a s l o w e r r a t e o f c o o l i n g o f t k e m o r t a r , compared w i t h t h a t o f t h e m o r t a r l a i d i n c o n t a c t w i t h t h ? c o l d b r i c k c o n d i t i o n ( c ) .I t l,vas c o n s i d e r e d t h 8 t a n y damage t o b r l c b v o r k a s a r e s u l t o f f r e e z i n g would be more s e v e r e i f e a r l i e r P r e e z i - n g o f t h e f r e s h m o r t : . ~ r t o o k p l a c e , and f o r t h i s r e a s o n no s t u d y was made o f t h e e f f e c - t s of f r e e z i n g b r i c b v o r l r which h2(1 b e e n aged f o r a c o n s i d . e r a b l e l e n g t h o f t i m e a t a b o v e - f r e e z i n g t e m p e r a t u r e . A l s o , t h e e f f e c t of a l t e r n a t e f r e e z i n g and t h a w i n ~ was n o t
i n v e s t i g a t e d .
For t h e p a n e l s consl;ructec3 und c r "normal" c o n d i t i o n s (73OY) t h e p r o c e d u r e nclopted was t o ::-tore t h e completed p a n e l i n R p1.ar;ti.c c o l ~ c : r f o r 74 h o u r s , thc.t~ I ~ ~ t h e uncovered p a n e l C C
i n a h i ~ h - h t ~ m i d i t y chamber ('7Y0Te and 100 p e r c e n t
R.H.)
f o r 6 d a y s . I t was t h e n removed from t h e chamber and t e s t e d f o rmoist us:^ p e n e t r a t i o n . Aftewvnrds, t h e p a n ~ l was p l a c ? d i n a
room a t 7-3O1;',
50
p e r c e n t R . H . , untj.3 age 1 4 d a y s .hihen t h ~ bond s t r e n g t h t e s t was made.The pa:lc,l-s which were c o n s t r u c t e d i n t h e c o l d room werc l e f t t h e r e f o r 21 2,ours. On removal t h e y were p l a c e d i n t h e h i f h - h u m i d i t y chamber (73'F and 1 0 0 p e r c e n t R . 9 . ) f o r 7
days and t h e m o i s t i l r e p e n e t r a t i o n t e s t was t h e n made, A f t e r t h i s t e s t t h e r e was a p e r i o d o f ::torage a t 73OP and 50 p e r c e n t
R.H. i ~ n t i l t h e p a n e l was 1 5 d a y s 014, v~hen t h e bond s t r e n g t h
was d e t e r m i n e d .
Some p a n e l s were made of l i m e m o r t a r , i n which c a s e t h e y were s t o r e d a f t e r c o n s t r u c t i o n f o r 1 4 d a y s i n a room a t 73OF and 50 p e r c e n t R.H. ( r a t h e r t h a n
7
da$s a t 100 p e r c e n t h u m i d i t y a s f o r t h e o t h e r p a n e l s ) , and a t a g e 1 4 d.ays t h e m o i s t u r e p e n e t r a t i o n t e s t was made. The bond s t r e n g t h t e s t of p a n e l s of l i m e mort;ar was mad.e a t a g e 28 d a y s ( i n s t e a d of 1 4 d a y s a s f o r t h e o t h e r p a n e l s ) .One t y p e of b r i c k was u s e d , a d e n s e , l o w - s u c t i o n r e d b r i c k made by t h e e x t r u s i o n p r o c e s s . The i n i t i a l r a t e of
a b s o r p t i o n was i n t h e r a n g e 1 t o
5
p e r minute p e r 30 s q u a r e i n c h e s . The b r i c k s c o n t a i n e t l 10 c o r e h o l e s , a r r a n g e d i n two rows, and t h e s u r f a c e s o f t h e b r i c k s were smooth, n o t t e x t u r e d .MORTARS
Lime, p o r t l a n d cement, m i x t u r e s of l i m e and p o r t l a n d cement, and two t y p e s of masonry cement were used w i t h s a n d t o p r e p a r e m o r t a r . The r a t i o b y volume of c e m e n t i n g m a t e r i a l t o sand was 1 : 3 , e x c e p t f o r one of t h e masonry cements which i n
a c c o r d a n c e w i t h t h e m a n u f a c t u r e r ~ s recommendation was p r o p o r t i o n e d
w i t h sand i n t h e r a t i o 1:2-213. One masonry cement was a n i n t e r - grouncl m i x t u r e of p o r t l a n d cement and l i m e s t o n e , w h i l e t h e - o t h e r was a b l e n d of p o r t l a n d cement and h y d r a t e d l i m e .
One of t h e cement:lime m o r t a r s was composed o f one p a r t by volume of w e l l - a g e d l i m e p u t t y , two p a r t - s of p o r t l a n d cement and n i n e volilmes of s a n d , w h i l e t h e o t h e r cement:lime m o r t a r c o n t a i n e d two p a r t s of l i m e , one p a r t of p o r t l a n d cement and n i n e p a r t s of s a n d ,
The m o r t a r s were used i n two c o n s f ~ s t e n c i e s of 115 p e r c e n t and 1 2 5 p e r c e n t f l o w a s measured by t h e f l o w t a b l e . H i g h l y v a r i a b l e flax v a l u e s of d u p l i c a t e b a t c h e s of t h e same m o r t a r , however, werc frequently n o t e d .
Thc r e s u l t s o b t a i n e d from t h e t e s t s a r e sumrnarizecl i n Table I. The corrlposition of t h e m o r t a r used i n t h e p a n e l
and its flocv, t h e c o n d i t i o n s under which t h e p a n e l was c o n s t r u c t e d , t h e d i m e n s i o n : ~ l changcs which o c c u r r e d , t h e t o t a l amount of
lealcace wlrich t o o k p l a c e i n 24 h o u r s of t e s t f o r m o i s t u r e penc.tra-tion, and t h e average bond stren'gth of t h e f o u r m o r t a r
j o i n t s of t h e p a n e l , a r e shown. DIMENSIONAL CHANGES
-
!Vhen b r i c k s and m o r t a r were assembled und-er "normal" c o n d i t i o n s ( i n a room a t
73OF)
and were maintained a t t h i s t e m p e r a t u r eu n t i l
t h e t e s t s were made, i n a l l c a s e s s h r i n k a g eof -6he panel t o o k p l a c e . Most of t h e movement t o o k p l a c e i n t h e f i r s t
7
days ( i . e . up t o t h e t i m e of t h e l e a k a g e t e s t ) .I n -the n e x t
7
days ( u p t o t h e t i m e of t h e bond s t r e n g t h t e s t ) t h e r e was l i t t l e a d d i t i o n a l s h r i n k a g e . The f l o w ( w e t n e s s ) of t h e m o r t a r d i d n o t a p p e a r t o i n f l u e n c e g r e a t l y t h e amount ofs h r i n k a g e . The maximum s h r i n k a g e was s l i g h t l y l e s s t h a n 0.007 i n c h , i n a n e f f e c t i v e p a n e l h e i g h t of a b o u t 11 i n c h e s , o r about 0.06 p e r c e n t .
',Then t h e b r i c k s and m o r t a r were assembled i n t h s c o l d room, however, t h e dimensional changes were q u i t e d i f f e r e n t from t h o s e of p a n e l s assembled under "normal1' c o n d i t i o n s . I n s t e a d of s h r i n k a g e , expansion occurred d u r i n g t h e f r e e z i n g of t h e p a n e l s . When t h e p a n e l s were thawed ( a f t e r 24 h o u r s i n t h e c o l d room), a pronounced s h r i n k a g e t o o k p l a c e . T h i s "thawing s h r i n k a g e " i n some c a s e s exceeded t h e i n i t i a l " f r e e z i n g expansion" and i n o t h e r c a s e s was l e s s t h a n t h e expansion, s o t h a t a n e t
movement i n t h e p a n e l from t h e f r e e z i n g and thawing r e s u l t e d . The " f r e e z i n g and thawing" movements were a p p r e c i a b l y g r e a t e r i n e x t e n t t h a n t h e "normal1' s h r i n k a g e of unfrozen p a n e l s .
The d i f f e r e n c e
i n
r e s u l t s between p a n e l s made of c o l d b r i c k s and t h o s e made of warm b r i c k s( i n
b o t h c a s e s assembled i n t h e coldroom)
appeared t o be i n t h e r a t e of f r e e z i n g , andit appeared t h a t w i t h t h e c o l d b r i c k s t h e m o r t a r o f t h e bottom j o i n t s of t h e p a n e l was f r o z e n b e f o r e t h e p a n e l was completed, and f o r t h e s e j o i n t s t h e r e f o r e t h e " f r e e z i n g expansion" had t a k e n p l a c e b e f o r e measurement of p a n e l h e i g h t was made.
A f t e r t h e bond s t r e n g t h t e s t s were made, d i s t i n c t i v e " c r o w f s - f e e t " c r y s t a l p a t t e r n s were observed a t t h e b r i c k - m o r t a r i n t e r f a c e of many of t h e p a n e l s which had been f r o z e n . There seems l i t t l e doubt t h a t t h e " f r e e z i n g expansion." was due t o t h e formation of i c e c r y s t a l s i n t h e mortar, o r between m o r t a r and b r i c k , and t h e p a t t e r n s of t h e c r y s t a l s remained a f t e r thawing. MOISTURE PXNETI?ATION
-
A s shown i n Tablq I , o n l y t h o s e p a n e l s of t h e two masonry cements had no l e a k a g e t h r o u & t h e p a n e l i n t h e 24 h o u r s of t e s t when c o n s t r u p t e d under "normal" a s w e l l a s under
e a r l y - f r e e z i n l : con(li.tions. The r e s j . s t a n c e t o moisture p e n e t r a t i o n of thesc! p a n c l s thr?rcrt'o.re, a p p a r e n t l y was n o t i n f l u e n c e d by
e a r l y f r e c z i n ~ : . I n n S l o t h e r c a s e s however, t h e cons1;rucl;j.on o f t h e p a n e l s i n t h e cold room had a n a d v e r s e e f f e c t on r e s i s - t a n c e t o m o i s t i ~ r o pt!nf?tra-tion. For example, p a n e l s of t h e p o r t l a n d cement and sand. m o r t a r and. of t h e cement-lime m o r t a r s
( 1 : 2 : 9 cement:lime:sand and 2:1:9 cernent:lime:sand) when
c o n s t r u c t e d ~ ~ n c i e r condi-Lions had no lealcage of w a t e r i n 24 h o u r s of t e s t , b u t when c o n s t r u c t e d i n t h e cold room, however, t h e r e was lealcage through t h e p a n e l s i n t h e m o i s t u r e p e n e t r a t i o n t e s t . The e a r l y f r e e z i n g of t h e s e p a n e l s , t h e r e f o r e , r e s u l t e d i n more permeable briclcworlc. S i m i l a r l y , t h e p a n e l s of t h e lime : sa.nd mortar c o n s t r u c t e d und.er "normal" c o n d i t i o n s
allowed a p p r e c i a b l e moisture p e n e t r a t i o n i n t h e 24 h o u r s of t e s t , and t h e amount of lealcage was g r e a t l y i n c r e a s e d when t h e p a n e l s were c o n s t r u c t e d . i n t h e c o l d room.
BOND STRENGTH
:Panels of a l l . m o r t a r s had lower bond s t r e n g t h when c o n s t r u c t e d . i n t h e c o l d room compared w i t h s i m i l a r p a n e l s con- s t r u c t e d . und.er "normal" c o n d i t i o n s . I n most c a s e s t h e r e d u c t i o n i n s t r e n o h was a p p r e c i a b l e . For example, p a n e l s of t h e 1 : 2 : 9 cement: lime: sand m o r t a r had a n a v e r a g e bond s t r e n g t h of a b o u t 12.5 p . s . i . when c o n s t r u c t e d und.er "normal11 c o n d i t i o n s , b u t only about h a l f t h i s v a l u e under cold. room c o n s t r u c t i o n . S i m i l a r l y , f o r p a n e l s of t h e 2 : l : g cement:lime:sand m o r t a r , t h e "normal" bond s t r e n g t h was o v e r
30
p . s . i , b u t t h i s was reduced. t o a b o u t 21 p . s . i . f o r c o l d room c o n s t r u c t i o n w i t h warm b r i c k s , and t o about 16 p . s . i . f o r c o l d room c o n s t r u c t i o n w i t h c o l d b r i c k s . For s e v e r a l of t h e p a n e l s s u b j e c t e d t o e a r l y f r e e z i n g t h e bond. s t r e n g t h was c o n s i d e r a b l y l e s s when c o l d b r i c k s were used. t h a n warm b r i c k s . I t i s c l e a r from t h e r e s u l t s shown i n Table I t h a t e a r l y f r e e z i n g of t h e p a n e l s r e s u l t e d . i n c o n s i d e r a b l y lowers t r e n g t h of bond t h a n t h a t o b t a i n e d from "normal" c o n s t r u c t i o n ,
BOND STRENGTH OF PR0Z:EN BFUCICl"J0RK
Tiken though t h e bond s t r e n g t h of p a n e l s which were f r o z e n t h e n thawed was l e s s t h a n t h a t of s i m i l a r p a n e l s whlch had n o t been f r o z e n , it was found t h a t w h i l e a p a n e l remained f r o z e n it had a p p r e c i a b l e s t r e n g t h of bond. T h i s was determined by makine a t e s t f o r bond s t r e n g t h while a p a n e l was i n t h e
f r o z e n s t a t e . The bond s t r e n g t h t h u s measured was o v e r 7 0 . p . s . i , , compared w i t h l e s s t h a n 1 2 p.s. i. f o r s i m i l a r b r i c k and m o r t a r assembled without subsequent f r e e z i n g . I t a p p e a r s t h a t i c e may
Iorm a comenting m a t e r i a l between t h e b r i c k s , adding t o t h e s t r e n g t h of t h e assemblage a s l o n g a s it remains a s i c e .
A f c v r t e s t s were made u s i n g 2-inch cubes of a masonry ccmen-t rnortar .to i n v e s t i g a t e t h e e f f e c t of e a r l y f r e e z i n g o f t h e frqr.h m o r t a r on i t s compressive s t r e n g t h . No a p p r e c i a b l e d i I f e r e n 2 e i n compressive s t r e n g t h was noted however when cubes
were made and s t o r e d under "normal1t
(73OP)
c o n d i t i o n s and when s i m i l a r cubes were frozen a t a n e a r l y age t h e n thawed andsubsequently t e s t e d . The compressive s t r e n g t h of mortar cubes which had been f r o z e n , and t e s t e d while s t i l l f r o z e n , s l i g h t l y
exceeded t h e compressive s t r e n g t h of "nonnal" mortar cubes i n d i c a t i n ~ t h a t t h e presence of i c e i n t h e mortar contribu-l-es
t o t h e compressive s t r e n g t h a s l o n g a s it remains a s i c e .
The e f f e c t of e a r l y f r e e z i n g of b r i c k masonry panels on dimensional changes, bond s t r e n g t h and r e s i s t a n c e t o moisture p e n e t r a t i o n was s t u d i e d . The i n v e s t i g a t i o n was r e s t r i c t e d t o
t h e use of a low s u c t i o n b r i c k w i t h mortars of s e v e r a l compositions. Panels c o n s t r u c t e d without subsequent f r e e z i n g shrank, v!hile t h o s e which were c o n s t r u c t e d i n a cold room expanded, and
subsequently shrank on thawing. The s t r e n g t h of bond between b r i c k and mortar i n a l l c a s e s was reduced a s a r e s u l t of t h e e a r l y f r e e z i n g , when compared with t h e bond s t r e n g t h of s i m i l a r panels which had n o t been f r o z e n . The e f f e c t of e a r l y f r e e z i n g on r e s i s t a n c e t o moisture p e n e t r a t i o n was v a r i a b l e ; some panels were f r e e of leakage under both "normal" and " e a r l y f r e e z i n g "
c o n d i t i o n s of c o n s t r u c t i o n , while o t h e r s v e r e l e a k - f r e e under llnormaltt c o n d i t i o n s b u t were permeable when b u i l t under f r e e z i n g c o n d i t i o n s , ? a r l y f r e e z i n g o f b r i c k masonry of t h e m a t e r i a l s used t h e r e f o r e s i g n i f i c a n t l y a f f c c t c d t h e p r o p e r t i e s of t h e brickwork; t h e f o m a t l - o n of i c e c r y s t a l s a t t h e brick-mortar i n t e r f a c e and i n t h e mortar was observed.
Thc s t r e n g t h o f bond, and compressive s t r e n g t h , of b r i c l c ~ o r k while s t i l l i n t h e f r o z e n s t a t e was i n d i c a t e d . t o be h i g h e r t h a n t h a t of unfrozen b r i c h ~ o r ' . ~ , t h e i c e a p p a r e n t l y a c - t i n g a s a cementing agent.
REPERENCES
(1) R i t c h i e ,
T.
A Small-panel method f o r i n v e s t i g a t i n g moisture p e n e t r a t i o n of b r i c k masonry. National Research Council, Division of B u i l d i n g Research, I n t e r n a l Report No. 160, Ottawa, September 1958.( 2 ) Hodgins, P. T. Small r i c k panel t e s t s a t Ottawa
-
a p p a r a t u s and t e c L l i q u e s f o r s t u d y of bond s t r e n g t h .
National Research Council, Division of Building
T A B L E I RESULTS OF TESTS MORTAR COMPOSITION l:3 Lime: Sand I t I ? I t n ?I TOTAL
DIMENSIONAL CHANGE ( INCRES ) ( LEAKAGE AVERAGE
MORTAR CONDITION OF NORMAL ON ON 24 BOND
n o w
CONSTRUCTION (+I CONSTRUCTION FREEZING THAWING HRS.
S T ~ G T Hrn
( p . s . 1 . )1 2 5 Normal -0 .OOSS 443 1 3
115 Normal -0.0056 527 1.5
125 Cold Room
-
Warm Bricks +0.0136 -0.0247 no t e s t 0115 Cold ?toom
-
Warm Bricks +O .0210-OO.Oy
3035 44500
125 Cold Room
-
Cold Bricks + O . O O O ~ -0.05 2 0115 Cold Room
-
Cold Bricks no t e s t no t e s t no t e a t 01:2:9 Cement: Lime: Sand 125 Normal -0.0033 0 12.8
l? 115 Normal -0.0025 0 12.9
II 125 Cold Room
-
Warn Bricks +O .0137 -0 .Ol3O 164 6.8?t 115 Cold Room
-
Warm Bricks +O.O2O9 -0.0150350 6.2
n 125 Cold Room
-
Cold Bricks +O .0019 -0.0165 78 6.111 115 Cold Room
-
Cold Bricks + O . O O ~ -0.0175 161 6.52:1:9 Cement: Lime: Sand 125 Normal -0.0024 0 36.6
11 115 Normal -G 0017 0 31 3
I( 125 Cold Room
-
Warm Bricks +0.0168 -0.0082 217 20.2I! 115 Cold Room
-
Warm Bricks +O. 0183 -0 -007811 125 Cold Room
-
Cold Bricks no t e s t -0.00624g
17.822.5
11 115 Cold Room
-
Cold Bricks +0.0018 -0.0081 7 214.4
3 Portland Cement: Sand 115 Normal -0.000s 0 45 2
II 115 Cold Room
-
Warm Bricks +O .Ol45 -0 -0077 120 13.1I 1 115 Cold Room
-
Cold Bricks +O .0057 -0.0150 128 10.91 : Masonry Cement: Sand
11
1: 2 2/3 Masonry Cement: Sand
11
No r n a l Nonnal
Cold Room
-
Warm Bricks Cold Room-
Warm Bricks Cold Room-
Cold Bricks Cold Room-
Cold S r i c k s NonnalNormal
Cold Room
-
Warm Bricks Cold Room-
Warm Bricks Cold Room-
Cold Bricks Cold Room-
Cold Bricks-0.0010 -0.0014 +O
.
00 34 +O .0058%.88?8
-0.0035 -0.0038 +o .0140+o
.0020 no t e s t no t e s t( G ) Normal = M a t e r i a l s a t 7 3 ' ~ c o n s t r u c t e d and maintained a t temp. of 7 3 O ~ . ( ) Minus s i g n i n d i c a t e s shrinkage
Cold Room