• Aucun résultat trouvé

On unique extension of time changed reflecting brownian motions

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "On unique extension of time changed reflecting brownian motions"

Copied!
12
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

www.imstat.org/aihp 2009, Vol. 45, No. 3, 864–875

DOI: 10.1214/08-AIHP301

© Association des Publications de l’Institut Henri Poincaré, 2009

On unique extension of time changed reflecting Brownian motions

Zhen-Qing Chen

a,1

and Masatoshi Fukushima

b,2

aDepartment of Mathematics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA. E-mail: [email protected] bBranch of Mathematical Science, Osaka University, Toyonaka, Osaka 560-0043, Japan. E-mail: [email protected]

Received 8 May 2008; accepted 26 August 2008

Abstract. LetDbe an unbounded domain inRdwithd≥3. We show that ifDcontains an unbounded uniform domain, then the symmetric reflecting Brownian motion (RBM) onDis transient. Next assume that RBMXonDis transient and letY be its time change by Revuz measure1D(x)m(x)dxfor a strictly positive continuous integrable functionmonD. We further show that if there is somer >0 so thatD\B(0, r)is an unbounded uniform domain, thenY admits one and only one symmetric diffusion that genuinely extends it and admits no killings.

Résumé. NotonsDun domaine non borné dansRd avecd≥3. Nous montrons que siDcontient un domaine uniforme non borné, alors le mouvement brownien réfléchi (RBM) surDest transient. Par ailleurs, supposons que le RBM X surDest transient et notonsY son changement de temps par une mesure de Revuz1D(x)m(x)dxpour une fonctionmstrictement positive, continue et intégrable surD. Nous démontrons alors que si il existe unr >0 tel queD\B(0, r)soit un domaine uniformément non borné, alorsY admet une unique extension en une diffusion symétrique qui n’est jamais tuée.

MSC:Primary 60J50; secondary 60J60; 31C25

Keywords:Reflecting Brownian motion; Transience; Time change; Uniform domain; Sobolev space; BL function space; Reflected Dirichlet space;

Harmonic function; Diffusion extension

1. Introduction

Consider an unbounded domainD in Rd withd ≥3 possessing continuous boundary. Then(12D, W1,2(D)) is a regular strongly local Dirichlet form onL2(D;dx), whereD(u, v)=

Du(x)· ∇v(x)dx. The symmetric diffusion processXassociated with this form is the symmetric reflecting Brownian motion onDwith infinite lifetime. In this paper, we are concerned with the following two questions:

(i) WhenXis transient?

(ii) IfXis transient, then almost all sample paths ofXapproach to the point at infinityofDas time goes to infinity.

LetY be its time change by Revuz measure1D(x)m(x)dx for a strictly positive continuous integrable function monD. The time-changed processY has finite lifetime with probability one. How many symmetric diffusions are there that genuinely extendsY?

We show that ifD contains an unbounded uniform domain (see Definition 2.1 below), then RBM X on D is transient. We further show that if there is somer >0 so that D\B(0, r)is an unbounded uniform domain, thenY

1Supported in part by NSF Grant DMS-06-000206.

2Supported by Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research of MEXT No. 19540125.

(2)

admits a unique genuine diffusion extension that admits no killings. HereB(x, r)denotes the ball inRd centered atx with radiusr. The extension diffusion can be obtained through one-point darning ofY at∂.It can also be obtained through the active reflected Dirichlet form ofY. The key of our approach is to identify the reflected Dirichlet space ofY with the space

BL(D):=

uL2loc(D): ∂u

∂xiL2(D),1≤id

of Beppo Levi functions onDand to show that BL(D)is the linear space spanned byWe1,2(D)and constant functions under suitable conditions onD. HereWe1,2(D)is the extended Dirichlet space of(12D, W1,2(D)); see next section for its definition.

2. Transience of reflecting Brownian motion

LetEbe a locally compact separable metric space andma positive Radon measure onEwith full support. Numerical functionsf, g onE is said to be m-equivalent ifm(f =g)=0. We write asf =g [m] in this case. Let(E,F) be a Dirichlet form on L2(E;m) and (Fe,E) be its extended Dirichlet space. A functionu is in Fe if and only if |u|<∞ [m] and there exists{un} ⊂F called an approximating sequence ofu such that{un}isE-Cauchy and limn→∞un=u [m].It holds then that E(u, u)=limn→∞E(un, un).We know thatF=FeL2(E;m)and that every normal contraction operates on(Fe,E).

Denote by{Tt;t >0}be theL2-semigroup generated by the Dirichlet formEand define{St, t >0}by the Bochner integralStf=t

0Tsfds, f ∈L2(E;m).The operatorSt then extends fromL2L1to a bounded linear operator on L1(E;m)such that 0≤StfStf for 0≤t < tandfL1+(E;m). Hence forfL1+(E;m),

Gf (x)= lim

N→∞SNf (x)(≤ ∞)

defines a functionGf uniquely up to them-equivalence. The Dirichlet form(E,F)is calledtransient(resp.recurrent) if Gf <∞ [m] for some fL1+(E;m) withf >0 [m] (resp.m(0< Gf <)=0 for everyfL1+(E;m)).

An m-measurable setAEis said to be{Tt}-invariantif 1ATt1Ac =0 [m].The Dirichlet form (E,F)is called m-irreducibleif for any{Tt}-invariant setA, we have eitherm(A)=0 orm(Ac)=0. If the Dirichlet form(E,F)is irreducible, then it is either transient or recurrent. The following criteria are known [6]. The Dirichlet form(E,F)is transient if and only if one of the next conditions is satisfied:

(Fe,E)is a real Hilbert space; (2.1)

uFe, E(u, u)=0 ⇒ u=0[m]. (2.2)

The Dirichlet form(E,F)is recurrent if and only if

1∈Fe and E(1,1)=0. (2.3)

Denote by Cc(E)the space of all continuous functions onE with compact support. For a Dirichlet form (E,F), a subspaceCofFCc(E)is called acoreofEifCisE1-dense inFand uniformly dense inCc(E).A Dirichlet formE is calledregularif it possesses a core. A Dirichlet form(E,F)is said to bestrongly localifE(u, v)=0 whenever K=Supp[u·m]is compact andvis constant in a neighborhood ofK.Any strongly local regular Dirichlet form on L2(E;m)is known to admit an associatedm-symmetric diffusion process onEthat admits no killing insideE.

In the following, we will take the state spaceEto be a Euclidean domainDinRd. We denote byLp(D), p≥1, theLp-space of functions onDwith respect to the Lebesgue measure dx. We focus our attention on the space

BL(D)=

T: ∂T

∂xiL2(D),1≤id

(2.4)

(3)

of Schwartz distributionsT .It is known that any distributionT ∈BL(D)can be identified with a function inL2loc(D) (cf. Schwartz [13], Deny and Lions [5]) so that

BL(D)=

uL2loc(D): ∂u

∂xiL2(D),1≤id

, (2.5)

where the derivatives are taken in Schwartz distribution sense. Members in BL(D)are called BL (Beppo Levi)func- tionsonD. Foru, v∈BL(D), we put

D(u, v)= d i=1

D

∂u

∂xi

∂v

∂xi dx. (2.6)

The space BL(D)is known to enjoy the following properties (cf. [5]):

(BL.1) The quotient spaceBL(D)˙ of BL(D)by the subspace of constant functions is a Hilbert space with inner prod- uctD.AnyD-Cauchy sequenceun∈BL(D)admitsu∈BL(D)and constantscnsuch thatunisD-convergent touandun+cnisL2loc-convergent tou.

(BL.2) A function uonDis in BL(D)if and only if for eachi (1id), there is a versionu(i)ofu such that it is absolutely continuous on almost all straight lines parallel toxi-axis and the derivative∂u(i)/∂xi in the ordinary sense (which exists a.e. onD) is inL2(D). In this case, the ordinary derivatives coincide with the distribution derivatives ofu.

TheSobolev space of order(1,2)on the domainD⊂Rdis defined by

W1,2(D)=BL(D)∩L2(D). (2.7)

Then

(E,F)= 1

2D, W1,2(D)

(2.8) is a Dirichlet form onL2(D).

LetDdenote the class of domains in Rd so that the Dirichlet form(E,F)of (2.8) is regular onL2(D); that is, W1,2(D)Cc(D)is both dense in(W1,2(D),·1,2)and in(C(D),·). HereC(D)is the space of continuous functions onDthat vanishes at infinity. A domainD⊂Rdis inDif one of the following two conditions hold:

(i) Dhas continuous boundary (see Theorem 2 on p. 14 of [12]); that is, for everyz∂D, there is somer >0 so thatB(z, r)Dis the domain lying above the graph of a continuous function;

(ii) Dis anextendable domainin the sense thatW1,2(D)=W1,2(Rd)|D; in other words, every functionuW1,2(D) admits a function uW1,2(Rd) such that u=u a.e. on D. When D is an extendable domain, Cc(D)= Cc(Rd)|D is a core for(E,F). HereCc(Rd)is the space of infinitely differentiable functions with compact support onRd.

Definition 2.1. A domainDis called a locally uniform domain if there areδ(0,∞]andC >0such that for every x, yD with|xy|< δ,there is a rectifiable curveγ inD connectingx andy withlength(γ )≤C|xy|and, moreover,

min

|xz|,|zy|

Cdist z, Dc

for everyzγ .

A domain is said to be a uniform domain if the above property holds withδ= ∞.

The above definition is taken from Väisälä [15], where various equivalent definitions are discussed. Uniform do- main and locally uniform domain are also called(ε,)-domain and(ε, δ)-domain, respectively, in [10]. For example, the classical van Koch snowflake domain in the conformal mapping theory is a uniform domain inR2. Note that every bounded Lipschitz domain is uniform, and everynontangentially accessible domaindefined by Jerison and Kenig in

(4)

[9] is a uniform domain (see (3.4) of [9]), while every Lipschitz domain is an(ε, δ)-domain. LetSd1denote the unit sphere{x∈Rd:|x| =1}inRdand(r, θ )the polar coordinates inRd. It is easy to check that a truncated infinite cone CA,a:= {(r, θ ): r > aandθA}inRdfor any connected open setASd1with Lipschitz boundary is a uniform domain. However, the boundary of a uniform domain can be highly nonrectifiable and, in general, no regularity of its boundary can be inferred (besides the easy fact that the Hausdorff dimension of the boundary is strictly less thann).

It is known that every locally uniform domainDadmits a bounded linear operator T:

W1,2(D), · 1,2

W1,2

Rd , · 1,2

(2.9)

(see [10]) and so in particular it is an extendable domain.

WhenDD, the Dirichlet form (2.8) is regular and strongly local onL2(D). Its associated diffusion process is called symmetric (or normally) reflected Brownian motion (RBM) onD. WhenD=Rd, then the associated process is thed-dimensional standard Brownian motion and hence (2.8) is transient ifn≥3 and recurrent ifd=1,2.By the following lemma, (2.8) is recurrent for anyDDwheneverd=1,2.

Lemma 2.2. SupposeDDand letX=(Xt,Px)be RBM onD.

(i) RBMX onD is conservative in the sense that Px = ∞)=1 for q.e.xD,where ζ is the lifetime of X.

Moreover,X(or equivalently,the Dirichlet form(E,F)of(2.8))ism-irreducible.

(ii) SupposeD1, D2DandD1D2.LetX(i)be RBM onDi,i=1,2.IfX(1)is transient,then so isX(2).IfX(2) is recurrent,then so isX(1).

Proof. (i) The conservativeness ofXfollows from [6], Example 5.7.1. The transition function of Xdominates the transition function of the absorbed Brownian motion onDwhich is obtained from then-dimensional standard Brown- ian motion by killing upon leavingDand is known to have a strictly positive transition density onD.ThereforeXis irreducible.

(ii) If we assume the recurrence of (2.8) for D2, there exist unW1,2(D2), n≥1, which are D-Cauchy and convergent pointwise to 1 onD2.Thenvn=un|D1, n≥1, satisfy the same properties forD1, yielding the recurrence of (2.8) forD1.This implies the first assertion of (ii) because of the irreducibility proven in (i).

Let us denote by(We1,2(D),E)the extended Dirichlet space of (2.8). We may callWe1,2(D)theextended Sobolev spaceof order(1,2)onD.We denote byH(D)the space of all harmonic functions onDwith finite Dirichlet integral.

Lemma 2.3. We1,2(D)⊂BL(D)andE(u, u)=12D(u, u)foruWe1,2(D).If we denote byH(D)the collection of functions inBL(D)that isD-orthogonal to all functions inWe1,2(D),then

H(D)⊂H(D). (2.10)

Proof. ForuWe1,2(D), there is a sequence{un} ⊂W1,2(D)which isD-Cauchy and convergent toua.e.D(un, un) then converges toE(u, u).By(BL.1), there existv∈BL(D)and constantscn such that{un}isD-convergent tov and the sequence{un+cn}is convergent tovinL2loc(D).By choosing a subsequence if necessary, we may assume that the latter sequence converges tova.e. Then limn→∞cn=cexists,u=vcand consequently,u∈BL(D)and E(u, u)=12D(u, u).

Ifu∈BL(D)isD-orthogonal to all functions inWe1,2(D), then, sinceCc(D)W1,2(D), we have (u, f )= −D(u, f )=0 for everyfCc(D),

which implies thatu=0, namely, (a version of)uis harmonic onD.

Informally,H(D)is the space of harmonic functions onDhaving finite Dirichlet energy with zero normal deriv- ative on the boundary∂D.

(5)

If (2.8) is transient, then we see from (2.1) that the extended Sobolev space(We1,2(D),12D)is a real Hilbert space and in particular,

uWe1,2(D)having D(u, u)=0 ⇒ u=0 a.e., (2.11)

which means that the Hilbert space(We1,2(D),12D)is isometrically imbedded into a closed subspace of(BL(D),˙ 12D) by the canonical mapWe1,2(D)→ ˙BL(D).Accordingly, we have

Proposition 2.4. Assume that the Dirichlet form(2.8)onL2(D)is transient.Then(We1,2(D),12D)can be regarded as a closed linear subspace of the Hilbert space(BL(D),˙ 12D)by the canonical mapWe1,2(D)→ ˙BL(D).

BL(D)is a linear space spanned byWe1,2(D)andH(D).

The next lemma is well known (cf. [1]).

Lemma 2.5. WhenD=Rd,H(Rd)consists of all constant functions.Ifd≥3,then BL

Rd

is a linear space spanned byWe1,2 Rd

and constant functions. (2.12)

See [6], Example 1.5.3 for a proof, where however an incorrect statement that “the spaceWe1,2(Rd)is obtained from BL(Rd)by removing nonzero constant functions” was made. It should be corrected in the manner of (2.12). See also Remark 2.9 below.

We shall be concerned with a finite measurem(dx)=m(x)dxonDwith a density functionm(x)satisfying (A.1) m(x) >0 for everyxDandmCb(D)L1(D).

We then consider the form defined by E,F

= 1

2D,BL(D)∩L2(D;m)

, (2.13)

which is obtained just by replacingL2(D)withL2(D;m)in (2.7) and (2.8).

Proposition 2.6. The symmetric form(E,F)of(2.13)is a recurrent Dirichlet form on L2(D;m). Its extended Dirichlet space(E,Fe)coincides with the space(12D,BL(D)).

Proof. Since the convergence inL2(D;m)implies the convergence inL2loc(D), (2.13) can be readily seen to be a closed symmetric form onL2(D;m).Its Markovian property is an immediate consequence of(BL.2). It satisfies the recurrence condition (2.3) becausemis a finite measure onD.We further have

uFehaving E(u, u)=0 ⇒ uis constant a.e. (2.14)

To see this, supposeuFewithE(u, u)=0 and putu =ϕuwith the normal contraction ϕ (t ):=

( )t

, ∈N. (2.15)

ThenuL2(E;m)Fe=Fand henceE(u , u )=12D(u, u )=0.Thereforeu is a constant and we get (2.14) by letting → ∞.

Denote byF˙ethe quotient space ofFeby the subspace of constant functions. Just as in the proof of the preceding proposition but using (2.14) in place of (2.11), we conclude that the space(F˙e,E)is isometrically embedded into the space(BL(D),˙ 12D).

Take anyu∈BL(D)and putu =ϕuas above. By(BL.2),u ∈BL(D)and D(uu , uu )=

{x:|u(x)|> }|∇u|2dx→0, → ∞. (2.16)

(6)

SinceuFandu converges toupointwise,umust be an element ofFe.Hence the above isometric embedding

is an onto map and soFe=BL(D).

When the Lebesgue measure of the domainDis finite, then we can take the functionm≡1 in (2.13) in reducing FtoW1,2(D).Hence

Corollary 2.7. If the domainDis of finite Lebesgue measure,then(12D, W1,2(D))is a recurrent Dirichlet form on L2(D)and

We1,2(D)=BL(D). (2.17)

We will show in Theorem 3.1 below that BL(D)is the reflected Dirichlet space of(12D, W1,2(D))for anyDD in any dimensiond≥1.

In what follows, we are concerned with the following condition on the domainD⊂Rd: (A.2) DDand the Dirichlet form (2.8) onL2(D)is transient.

This condition forces dimensiond to be greater than or equal to 3 andD to have infinite Lebesgue measure in view of Lemma 2.2 and Corollary 2.7. We shall see from Theorem 2.10 below that, ifd≥3 andDDcontains an unbounded uniform domain, thenDsatisfies the condition (A.2); in other words, RBM onDis transient. This result is almost sharp since RBMX on an infinite cylinderD= {x=(x1, x2,·, xd)∈Rd: d

i=2xk2<1}whered≥3 is recurrent becauseXis direct product of the one-dimensional Brownian motion and the reflecting Brownian motion on the closed unit ball. Note that an infinite cylinder isnota uniform domain.

We first prepare a proposition.

Proposition 2.8. LetDbe an unbounded uniform domain inRd withd≥3andfWe1,2(Rd).Iff =ca.e.onD for some constantc,thenc=0.

Proof. Without loss generality, we assume that the origin 0∈D. SinceDis unbounded, there is a sequence{xk, k≥0}

so that|xk| =2Ck, whereC≥1 is the constant in the Definition 2.1 for the uniform domainD. By definition of uniform domain, for everyk≥1, there is a rectifiable curveγk connecting 0 andxk with 2Ck= |xk| ≤length(γk)C|xk| =2C2kand

min

|z|,|zxk|

Cdist z, Dc

for everyzγk.

Chooseykγksuch that|yk| = |ykxk|.Then clearly|yk| ≥ |xk|/2=Ck,2|yk| ≤length(γk)≤2C2kand further dist

yk, Dc

(1/C)(Ck)=k.

AccordinglyDcontains a sequence of open balls{B(yk, k), k≥1}withCk≤ |yk| ≤C2k.

LetX=(Xt,Px)be the Brownian motion inRd, which is transient asd≥3, ande1:=(1,0, . . . ,0)∈Rd. Observe that by the Brownian scaling and the rotation invariance of the Brownian motionX,

P0(XtDfor sometCk)

P0

XtB(yk, k)for sometCk

P0

XtB(yk, k)for somet≥ |yk|

=P0

XtB

e1, k/|yk|

for somet≥1/|yk|

P0

XtB

e1, C2

for sometC1

=:p0>0.

Consequently, P0

n≥1

kn

{XtDfor sometCk}

p0. (2.18)

(7)

Letbe the one-point compactification ofRd. As is well known, Px

tlim→∞Xt=

=1, x∈Rd. (2.19)

AnyfWe1,2(Rd)admits a versionfwhich is quasi-continuous in the restricted sense with respect to the transient extended Dirichlet space(We1,2(Rd),12D), namely, there exists a decreasing sequence of open subsets{Gn}of Rd such that Cap(0)(Gn)→0, n→ ∞, and the restriction offto each set(Rd\Gn)∪ {}is continuous there if we set f (∂) =0. By (2.9) of [3], it then holds that PxGn = ∞for somen≥1)=1, q.e. x ∈ Rd, which combined with (2.19) yields thatϕ(x)=1 for q.e.x∈Rd, whereϕ(x)=Px(limt→∞f (X t)=0).Hence, by the Markov prop- erty,

P0

tlim→∞f (X t)=0

=(2π)−d/2

Rde−|x|2/2ϕ(x)dx=1. (2.20)

SupposefWe1,2(Rd) equals a constantca.e. on D, then f=c q.e. onD, and we can deduce from (2.18)

and (2.20) thatc=0.

Remark 2.9. We can make the statement(2.12)more specific as follows:Whend≥3,We1,2(Rd)is obtained from the quotient spaceBL(˙ Rd)by choosing from each equivalence class a special function whose quasi-continuous version has zero limit at∂in the sense of(2.20).

Theorem 2.10. Assume thatd≥3andDis a domain inDthat contains an unbounded uniform domain.Then RBM onDis transient;in other words,Dsatisfies condition(A.2).

Proof. In view of the comparison result Lemma 2.2(ii), we may assume, without loss of generality, thatD is an unbounded uniform domain.

We first show thatWe1,2(D)=We1,2(Rd)|D. By [8], Theorem 4.13, there is a linear bounded extension operator S: BL(D)→BL(Rd)in the following sense: for everyu∈BL(D),Su∈BL(Rd)withSu=ua.e. onD, moreover,

(Su)

L2(Rd)MuL2(D) for everyu∈BL(D). (2.21)

ForuW1,2(D),Su∈BL(Rd)and so by Lemma 2.5, Su=v0+c for somev0We1,2(Rd)and constantc. On the other hand, by (2.9), there isT uW1,2(Rd)so thatT u=ua.e. onD. It follows thatT uv0We1,2(Rd)and T uv0=conD. Proposition 2.8 now implies thatc=0. This proves that the extension operatorSmapsW1,2(D) intoWe1,2(Rd). Now foruWe1,2(D), there is aD-Cauchy sequence{uk, k≥1} ⊂W1,2(D)so thatukua.e. onD.

By (2.21) and what we just established,{Suk, k≥1}is aD-Cauchy sequence inWe1,2(Rd). Since(We1,2(Rd),D)is a Hilbert space,SukisD-convergent to somefWe1,2(Rd). Taking a subsequence if necessary,Sukconverges tofa.e.

onRd. It follows thenu=f a.e. onD. This proves thatWe1,2(D)=We1,2(Rd)|D, as clearlyWe1,2(Rd)|DWe1,2(D).

(The above also implies thatSmapsWe1,2(D)intoWe1,2(Rd). This is because foruWe1,2(D),Su∈BL(Rd)and so Su=v0+cfor somev0We1,2(Rd)and constantc. On the other hand, there is somefWe1,2(Rd)so thatf =u a.e. onD. Thus we havefv0=conD. Sincefv0We1,2(Rd), we have by Proposition 2.8 thatc=0. This proves thatSu=v0We1,2(Rd).)

To show that RBM on D is transient, by (2.2) and Lemma 2.3, it suffices to show that if uWe1,2(D) has D(u, u)=0, thenu=0 onD. SupposeuWe1,2(D)andD(u, u)=0. Clearly,u=ca.e. onDfor some constantc.

We know from the above that there isu0We1,2(Rd)so thatu0=u=ca.e. onD. It follows from Proposition 2.8

thatc=0 and sou=0.

(8)

3. Unique symmetric extension and the space of BL-functions

We start this section with a domainDD, together with a measurem(dx)=m(x)dx onDwhose densitym(x)is strictly positive for everyxDand satisfiesmCb(D). Consider the following symmetric form

E(0),F(0)

= 1

2D, We1,2(D)L2(D;m)

, (3.1)

obtained by just replacing BL(D)withWe1,2(D)in (2.13). As for (2.13), the above form can be readily checked to be a Dirichlet form on L2(D;m).Furthermore, it is a regular and strongly local Dirichlet form on L2(D;m).The associated diffusion processY =(Yt,Px)onDis obtained from the reflecting Brownian motionXby a time change with respect to the additive functionalAt=t

0m(Xs)dsin view of [6], Section 6.2.

For a general regular Dirichlet form(E,F), the notions of its reflected Dirichlet space(Fref,Eref)and its active reflected Dirichlet form(Eref,Faref)were originally introduced by Silverstein (see [14]) and have been further studied in [2] when(E,F)is transient. These notions are well defined for the present Dirichlet form (3.1).

Assume thatmCb(D)withm(x) >0 for everyxDand let(E(0),F(0))be the Dirichlet form onL2(D;m) defined by (3.1). Following [2], let

Fref:=

f: fk:=ϕkfFloc(0)and sup

k1

D(fk, fk) <

,

Faref:=FrefL2(D;m), Eref(f, f ):=1

2

D

f (x)2dx=1

2D(f, f ) forfFref.

We call(Eref,Fref)and(Eref,Faref)the reflected Dirichlet form and the active reflected Dirichlet form, respectively, of(E(0),F(0))onL2(D;m). In [2], the above notions are defined for transient(E(0),F(0))and it is proved there that (Eref,Faref)is a Dirichlet form onL2(D;m). But these notions can also be defined when(E(0),F(0))is recurrent.

Theorem 3.1. LetDDbe a domain inRd withd≥1.Assume thatmCb(D)withm(x) >0 for everyxD.

Then the Dirichlet form(E,F)defined by(2.13)withm(dx)=m(x)dxis the active reflected Dirichlet form of the Dirichlet form(E(0),F(0))given by(3.1)andBL(D)is the reflected Dirichlet space of(E(0),F(0)).

Proof. ForfFrefL(D),fFloc(0) and sof ∈BL(D). For generalfFrefandk≥1, definefk=ϕkf for k ≥1, where ϕk is defined in (2.15). From above we have fk ∈BL(D) with Eref(fk, fk)= 12D(fk, fk).

Since supk1D(fk, fk) <∞, there is a Cesàro mean {gk, k≥1} of {fk, k≥1} that is D-Cauchy. Observe that gkFrefL(D)⊂BL(D). By (BL.1), there isu∈BL(D)and a sequence of constants{ck, k≥1}so thatgk is D-convergent touandgk+ckconverges toulocally inL2(D)ask→ ∞. But limk→∞gk=f onD. This implies that limk→∞ck=candf +c=u. Thereforef∈BL(D)and soFref⊂BL(D).

Now forf ∈BL(D), clearlyfk=ϕkf∈BL(D)∩L2loc(D)Floc(0)for everyk≥1. SinceD(fk, fk)D(f, f ), we conclude that fFaref. This completes the proof that BL(D)=Fref. It then follows immediately that F=

BL(D)∩L2(D;m)=FrefL2(D;m)=Faref.

Taking m(x)≡1 on D in Theorem 3.1 yields in particular that BL(D) is the reflected Dirichlet space for (12D, W1,2(D))for everyDDin any dimension.

We shall next consider a domainDDsatisfying the transience condition (A.2) and the functionmsatisfying condition (A.1). Thend≥3 andDis of infinite Lebesgue measure as is noted in Section 2. Abusing the notation a bit, we also useto denote the point at infinity ofD, namely, we letD=D∪ {}be the one point compactification ofD.Under condition (A.2), the reflecting Brownian motionX=(Xt,Px)onDsatisfies

Px

tlim→∞Xt=

=1 for q.e.xD (3.2)

(9)

on account of [3], Theorem 2.4. In this case, the Dirichlet form(E(0),F(0))of (3.1) is transient and its associated diffusion process, time-changed Brownian motionY =(Yt,Px)onD has lifetimeζ satisfyingPx(ζ <)=1 for q.e.xD. This is because, sincemL1(D,dx)and the RBMXonDis transient, by Lemma 1.5.1 of [6],EYx[ζ] = Ex[

0 m(Xs)ds]<∞for q.e.xD. Moreover,Yt approaches toastζ in view of (3.2).

Let us further make the following assumption on the domainD:

(A.3) H(D) consists of constant functions onD.

HereH(D)is the space of harmonic functions onDappearing in Lemma 2.3. Thus under the transience condition (A.2), (A.3) amounts to assuming that

BL(D)is a linear space spanned byWe1,2(D)and constant functions. (3.3) We will show in Theorem 3.5 below that conditions (A.2) and (A.3) hold for every unbounded uniform domain.

Moreover Proposition 3.6 will imply that the condition (A.3) is satisfied by any domainDDthat is the complement of a compact set.

Under the stated three conditions, we shall compare the form (E,F) defined by (2.13) and the (E(0),F(0)) defined by (3.1). They are Dirichlet forms onL2(D;m)and related to each other by

F=

u=u0+c: u0F(0), cis constant ,

E(u, u)=E(0)(u0, u0)=12D(u0, u0) (3.4)

in view of Proposition 2.4.

Letmbe the extension ofmfromDtoDobtained by setting m

∂D∪ {}

=0.

By identifyingL2(D;m)withL2(D;m), we can regard(E,F)as a Dirichlet form onL2(D;m).

Theorem 3.2. Assume that conditions(A.1), (A.2)and(A.3)hold.

(i) (E,F)is a recurrent,strongly local and regular Dirichlet form onL2(D, m).

(ii) The associated diffusion processY=(Yt,Px)onDis a conservative extension of the time changed transient reflected Brownian motionY onDand satisfies

Px<)=1 for q.e.xD. (3.5)

Proof. (i) The recurrence condition (2.3) is trivially satisfied by(E,F).If we letC= {u+c: uCc(D), cis constant}, thenCC(D)andCis readily seen to be a core of the Dirichlet form(E,F).The strong locality of (E,F)can be proved in the same way as in the proof of Theorem 3.2 of [7], where a Dirichlet form quite similar to (3.4) was studied in a rather general context.

(ii) SinceY is associated with(E0,F0),Yis an extension ofY fromDtoD=D∪ {}. The pointis notm- polar forXbecausePm<)dominates the quantityPm(ζ <) >0 forY.On the other hand, the irreducibility of(E,F)can be verified in a similar manner to [7]. Hence (3.5) holds in view of [6], Theorem 4.6.6.

Remark 3.3. The extended diffusionYofYin the above theorem can be also constructed stochastically by a darning ofY at∂as in[7]and[3],namely,by piecing together the excursions ofY around∂according to an excursion-valued Poisson point process{pt}.The characteristic measurenof{pt}is described as[7], (4.4)in terms of the transition function{qt}ofY and the{qt}-entrance law{μt}onEuniquely determined by the equation

m=

0

μtdt.

Using Theorem 3.1, we can further show thatYis the uniquem-symmetric continuous genuine extension ofY in the following sense.

(10)

Theorem 3.4. Suppose that there is a Luzin spaceEso thatDis embedded continuously inEas a dense open subset and there is an m-symmetric diffusionZ on E that admits no killings inside and thatY is the proper subprocess ofZ killed upon leaving D.Here the measure mis extended to E by settingm(E\D)=0.Then the symmetric Dirichlet form ofZonL2(E;m)coincides with that ofXonL2(D;m);in other words,ZunderPmhas the same finite-dimensional distributions as that ofYunderPm.

Note that althoughZandXlive on different state spaces, sincem(E\D)=0 andm({})=0, Pm(ZtE\D)=Pm

Yt=

=0 for everyt≥0

and so we can compare the finite-dimensional distributions ofZunderPmwith those ofYunderPm.

Proof of Theorem 3.4. Let(EZ,FZ)denote the symmetric Dirichlet form ofZonL2(E;m). It is known (cf. [11]) that(EZ,FZ)is quasi-regular onEand so, by [4], it is quasi-homeomorphic to a regular Dirichlet form on a locally compact metric space. Consequently, the results established under the regular Dirichlet form framework in [6] and [14] apply toZand(EZ,FZ).

LetLandL0be theL2-generators of the Dirichlet forms(EZ,FZ)onL2(E;m)and(E(0),F(0))onL2(D;m), respectively. SinceY is the part process ofZ killed upon leavingD, for everyf ∈Dom(L), there is a uniqueEZ- orthogonal decompositionf =f0+h, wheref0F(0) andhFZ so thatEZ(g, h)=0 for everygF(0). Note thathis harmonic with respect to the diffusionY (see [6]). Sincef ∈Dom(L), we have in particular

(−Lf, g)L2(D;m)=EZ(f, g)=E(0)(f0, g) for everygF(0)FZ.

The above implies thatf0∈Dom(L0)andL(0)f0=Lf. In the terminology of Silverstein ([14], Definition 15.1 on p. 152),L is contained in thelocal generator of (E(0),F(0)). So by [14], Theorem 15.2, and its proof as well as Theorem 3.1 above, we have

FZF and EZ(f, f )E(f, f ) forfFZ.

SinceZ is a genuine extension ofY,FZ must be the same asF in view of (3.4). For anyf =f0+c1Fwith f0F(0), since(EZ,FZ)is local and admits no killing, we have

EZ(f, f )=EZ(f0, f0)=E(0)(f0, f0)=E(f, f ).

This proves that(EZ,FZ)=(E,F).

Finally we give sufficient conditions for (A.3) to hold.

Theorem 3.5. LetD⊂Rdbe a uniform domain.ThenH(D)consists of all constant functions onD.In particular, ifd≥3andD⊂Rd is an unbounded uniform domain,thenDsatisfies conditions(A.2)and(A.3).

Proof. Again we use [8], Theorem 4.13, which states that there is a linear bounded extension operatorS: BL(D)→ BL(Rd)in the following sense: for everyu∈BL(D),Su∈BL(Rd)withSu=ua.e. onDand with bound (2.21).

Foru∈H(D)⊂BL(D),Su∈BL(Rd). Therefore, by Lemma 2.5,Su=f0+cfor somef0We1,2(Rd)and some constantc. Note thatf0|DWe1,2(D). Sincef0|D=uc∈H(D), we obtain

D(f0, f0)=0, (3.6)

which implies thatf0=c1for some constant. Henceu∈H(D)equals a constantc+c1onD.

The second statement of the theorem follows from the above and Theorem 2.10.

We can readily deduce the next proposition from the above theorem. In particular, any unbounded domainD⊂ Rd, d≥3, inDwith compact boundary satisfies (A.3).

(11)

Proposition 3.6. IfD⊂Rd,d≥3is an unbounded domain inDsuch thatD\B(0, r)is a uniform domain for some r >0,then condition(A.3)holds.

Proof. By normal contraction property, it suffices to show that for every bounded nonnegativeu∈BL(D),u=u0+c for someu0We1,2(D)and a constantc.

We putU=D\B(0, r)and takeφCc(Rd)such thatφ=1 onB(0, r+1). Asu∈BL(D)⊂BL(U )andUis an unbounded uniform domain, we see by the above theorem that there is a constantcwithu0:=ucWe1,2(U ). We claim that(1φ)u0We1,2(U ). This is because there is a sequencefnW1,2(U )such that supn1

U|∇fn|2dx=0 andfnu0, n→ ∞, a.e. on U. Since u0 is bounded, by the normal contraction property, we may assume that {fn, n≥1}are uniformly bounded. Clearly(1φ)fnW1,2(D),(1φ)fnconverges a.e. onDto(1φ)u0and

sup

n1

D

(1φ)fn2dx

≤2 sup

n1

fn2L(U )

Rd|∇φ|2dx+2(1φ)2

sup

n1

U

|∇fn|2dx <∞.

We conclude that(1φ)u0We1,2(D). On the other hand, sinceφu0W1,2(D), we haveuc=u0=φu0+(1

φ)u0We1,2(D). This proves the theorem.

Remark 3.7. The second statement of Theorem3.5is “sharp” for(A.3)in view of the following example.

IfDis an unbounded domain inRdwith two or more infinite branches,then condition(A.3)may fail.Consider D=B(0,1)∪

x=(x1, x2, . . . , xd): xd2>

d1

k=1

xk2

inRd ford≥3.HereB(x, r)denote the ball centered atx with radiusr >0.ClearlyDis a Lipschitz domain but it is not a uniform domain as it has a bottleneckB1.HoweverDcontains an unbounded uniform domain

C1:=B(0,1)cxd>

x12+ · · · +xd21 . So by Theorem2.10,condition(A.2)holds forD.

We claim that condition(A.3)does not hold forD.Define C2=B(0,1)c

xd<

x12+ · · · +x2d1 .

LetfCb2(D)be such thatf=1onC1andf=2onC2.Clearlyf ∈BL(D)and so we can write it asf=f0+h withf0We1,2(D)andh∈H(D).LetXbe RBM onD,which is transient as is noted in the above.By(3.2)

Px

tlim→∞f (Xt)=1 ·Px

tlim→∞f (Xt)=2

>0 for q.e.xD.

On the other hand,f0is quasi-continuous in the restricted sense with respect to the transient extended Dirichlet space(We1,2(D),12D):there exists a decreasing sequence of open subsets{Gn}ofD such thatCap(0)(Gn)→0as n→ ∞, and the restriction of f0 to each set (D\Gn)∪ {}is continuous there if we set f0(∂)=0. By(2.9) of [3], it then holds that PxGn = ∞for somen≥1)=1, q.e.xD, which combined with (3.2) leads us to limt→∞f0(Xt)=0 Px-a.s.for q.e.xD.Thus we havelimt→∞h(Xt)=limt→∞f (Xt)Px-a.s.for q.e.xD.

This yields thathcannot be a constant.

Remark 3.8. In the case where the reflecting Brownian motion onDis recurrent,we have the identification

We1,2(D),1 2D

=

BL(D),1 2D

. (3.7)

Références

Documents relatifs

Numerical results for 2D problems using mixed finite elements (with the lowest order Raviart-Thomas spaces on rectangles) for discretization in space and the lowest order

Keywords: mixed formulations, domain decomposition, advection-diffusion, optimized Schwarz waveform relaxation, time-dependent Steklov–Poincaré operator, nonconforming time grids..

Also, on the basis on the observations that quantum mechanics shows that the electron seems to follow several trajectories simultaneously and the theory

The radial part of a Dunkl process may be considered as a Brownian motion perturbed by a singular drift which forces the process to live in a cone generated by the intersection of

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des

Part of the research for this article was carried out while the authors were visiting the University of Bordeaux to participate at the Confer- ence on Harmonic Analysis,

Sojourn times and the exact Hausdorff measure of the sample path for planar Brownian motion.. Continuous martingales and

We construct a sequence of Markov processes on the set of dom- inant weights of the Affine Lie algebra ˆ sl 2 (C) which involves tensor product of irreducible highest weight modules