HAL Id: jpa-00226316
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/jpa-00226316
Submitted on 1 Jan 1987
HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.
L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.
STUDIES OF SURFACE PROPERTIES OF ICE USING NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE
Y. Mizuno, N. Hanafusa
To cite this version:
Y. Mizuno, N. Hanafusa. STUDIES OF SURFACE PROPERTIES OF ICE USING NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE. Journal de Physique Colloques, 1987, 48 (C1), pp.C1-511-C1-517.
�10.1051/jphyscol:1987170�. �jpa-00226316�
JOURNAL DE
PHYSIQUE
C o l l o q u e
C 1 ,supplgment a u n o 3, Tome 48, mars
1987STUDIES OF SURFACE PROPERTIES OF ICE USING NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE
Y. M I Z U N O
and
N.HANAFUSA
I n s t i t u t e o f Low Temperature S c i e n c e s , HoWraido U n i v e r s i t y , Sapporo 060, J a p a n
R 6 s d - Des e e r i e n c e s de rdsonance magndtique nucldaixe pul&e ont dt6 f a i t e s sur des p e t i t e s particules de glace ayant un grand rapport surface/volume pour dtudier l a couche quasi liquide
(Q.L.L.)2 l a surface de l a glace. La &pendance avec l a t d r a t u r e des caract6ristiques
IWNe t l e s propridtds dynamiques t e l l e s que l e temps de c o r r d l a t i o n pour l e mouvement de r o t a t i o n e t l e c o e f f i c i e n t d ' a u t o - d i f f u s i o n de l a Q.L.L. o n t 6 t d d d c r i t e s . La frdquence du mouvement moldcaaire rotationnel dans l e
Q.L.L.e t l e coefficient d'autc-diffusion sont plus grands respectivement de 5 et
2ordres de grandeur que dans l a glace en volume.
Abstract - Pulsed nuclear mgnetic resonance studies were carried out on small i c e p a r t i c l e s
withlarge surface to volume r a t i o s to investigate the so-called quasi- liquid layer
(Q.L.L.)on an i c e surface. The temperature dependence of features of
the N M R spectra and dynamical properties such asthe correlation
timef o r rota- tional m t i o n and the self diffusion coefficient of the
Q.L.L.were described. The frequency of the rotational mlecular m t i o n
andthe self diffusion coefficient were larger than those of bulk i c e
byabout five orders and by two orders, respec-
tively.
I .
I n t r o d u c t i o n
I t
i s g e n e r a l l y a c c e p t e d t h a t a mobile p h a s e , t h e s o - c a l l e d q u a s i - l i q u i d l a y e r
( Q . L . L . )on an i c e s u r f a c e , p l a y s an i m p o r t a n t r o l e i n some phenomena which o c c u r a t t e m p e r a t u r e s n e a r below t h e m e l t i n g p o i n t , s u c h a s snow metamorphism, s i n t e r i n g , a d h e s i o n , a c c r e t i o n and c r y s t a l growth. Many s t u d i e s r e l a t e d t o t h e
Q . L . L .have been c a r r i e d o u t i n t h e p a s t
30y e a r s t o c l a r i f y i t s e x i s t e n c e and t h e d i s t i n c t i v e s u r f a c e p r o p e r t i e s o f i c e .
Nakaya
( 1 )and Weyl
( 2 )have i n t e r p r e t e d t h e a d h e s i o n o b s e r v e d be- tween i c e s p h e r e s and r e g e l a t i o n i n t e r m s o f mobile I l l i q u i d - l i k e " s u r - f a c e s t r u c t u r e s . J e l l i n e k
( 3 )emphasized t h e e x i s t e n c e of t h e mobile phase b a s e d on e x t e n s i v e s t u d i e s on i c e a d h e s i o n and reviewed t h e s u r - f a c e p r o p e r t i e s o f i c e .
On t h e o t h e r h a n d , F l e t c h e r
( 4 )h a s shown t h e o r e t i c a l l y t h e e x i s - t e n c e o f t h e p r o p e r s u r f a c e s t r u c t u r e and concluded t h a t a t tempera- t u r e s above a b o u t - 5 ' ~ th e s u r f a c e of i c e i s covered by t h e Q.L.L., whose t h i c k n e s s i n c r e a s e s a s t h e t e m p e r a t u r e a p p r o a c h e s O°C.
D i r e c t e v i d e n c e o f t h e e x i s t e n c e of t h e
Q . L . L .on i c e s u r f a c e s h a s been p r e s e n t e d by many i n v e s t i g a t o r s u s i n g v a r i o u s e x p e r i m e n t a l t e c h - n i q u e s : Photoemission by Nason and F l e t c h e r ( 5 1 , p r o t o n c h a n n e l l i n g by Golecki and J a c c a r d
( 6 )and n u c l e a r magnetic r e s o n a n c e by K v l i v i d z e e t a l .
( 7 1 ,Anderson
( 8 ) ,B e l l e t a 1 . ( 9 ) and Ocampo and K l i n g e r ( 1 0 ) .
A
r e c e n t e l l i p s o m e t r i c a l s t u d y by Furukawa e t a l . ( l l ) p r o v i d e d de- t a i l e d i n f o r m a t i o n on t h e t h i c k n e s s and r e f r a c t i v e i n d e x of t h e l a y e r and i t s dependence on t h e c r y s t a l l o g r a p h i c s u r f a c e . T h e i r r e s u l t s on t h e c r y s t a l l o g r a p h i c s u r f a c e s u p p o r t t h e t h e o r e t i c a l t r e a t m e n t of t h e
Article published online by EDP Sciences and available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/jphyscol:1987170
C1-512 JOURNAL
DE
PHYSIQUEgrowth k i n e t i c s o f i c e from t h e vapor phase p r e s e n t e d by Kuroda and Lacmann
(12
).
I n f o r m a t i o n on t h e dynamical p r o p e r t i e s o f t h e
Q . L . L . ,i t s d i f f e r - e r e n c e from b u l k i c e o r i t s " l i q u i d - l i k e v f e a t u r e , i s i m p o r t a n t t o un- d e r s t a n d t h e above-mentioned snow and i c e phenomena which a r e c l o s e l y r e l a t e d t o t h e s u r f a c e p r o p e r t i e s o f i c e .
. I n t h i s c o n n e c t i o n , t h i s p a p e r d e s c r i b e s t h e dynamical p r o p e r t i e s o f t h e Q.L.L., t h e c o r r e l a t i o n time f o r r o t a t i o n a l m o l e c u l a r motion and t h e s e l f d i f f u s i o n c o e f f i c i e n t i n t h e Q.L.L. u s i n g p u l s e d n u c l e a r mag- ne t i c resonance.
11.
Experimental P r o c e d u r e s
I n o r d e r t o o b t a i n t h e NMR s i g n a l due t o i c e s u r f a c e s , s m a l l i c e p a r t i c l e s o f l e s s t h a n 150 pm i n d i a m e t e r were p r e p a r e d a t -30°C by f r e e z i n g s u p e r c o o l e d w a t e r d r o p l e t s s p r a y e d o u t from a n a t o m i z e r on a c l e a n t e f l o n s h e e t . The p a r t i c l e s were p u t i n t o a g l a s s c e l l f o r t h e
NMRs p e c t r o s c o p y . To p r e v e n t s i n t e r i n g between i c e p a r t i c l e s , t h e g l a s s c e l l was s t o r e d i n a c o l d chamber whose t e m p e r a t u r e was k e p t below -80°C.
T h e NMR measurements were made u s i n g a JEOL F X l O O N M R
s p e c t r o s c o p e eqyipped w i t h a s p i n l o c k i n g u n i t and a t e m p e r a t u r e c o n t r o l l i n g u n i t and o p e r a t e d a t 100
MHz.The t e m p e r a t u r e o f a sample was c o n t r o l l e d w i t h an accuracy o f * O.l°C, and f o r t h e r m a l e q u i l i b r i u m , e v e r y mea- surement performed a t a c e r t a i n t e m p e r a t u r e w a s s t a r t e d a f t e r k e e p i n g t h e sample f o r more t h a n
30m i n u t e s a t t h a t t e m p e r a t u r e .
To o b t a i n t h e t e m p e r a t u r e dependence on b o t h t h e i n t e n s i t y and t h e l i n e w i d t h , most of t h e measurements were made i n t h e p r o c e s s o f t h e t e m p e r a t u r e r i s i n g from
- 1 0 O 0 Ct o -5°C.
S p i n l a t t i c e r e l a x a t i o n t i m e T I and t h a t i n a r o t a t i n g frame
T I Pwere measured by t h e i n v e r s i o n r e c o v e r y and t h e s p i n l o c k i n g methods, r e s p e c t i v e l y .
111.
R e s u l t s
1. NMR
s i g n a l due t o s u r f a c e mobile phase F i g u r e
1shows
NMRs p e c t r a f o r t h e s u r f a c e mobile phase accumulated 200 t i m e s a t t h e v a r i o u s tem- p e r a t u r e s observed a t
9 9 . 5 MHz,t h e b r o a d s i g n a l due t o c r y s t a l l i n e i c e i s n o t s e e n w i t h i n t h e range o f o b s e r v a t i o n a l f r e q u e n c y o f 20 kHz.
The narrow s i g n a l was n o t d e t e c t e d a t any t e m p e r a t u r e when o n l y b u l k i c e was u s e d , and t h e s i g n a l s a p p e a r i n g i n F i g .
1were t h o u g h t t o be caused by a mobile phase a t an i n t e r f a c e between a i r and c r y s t a l - l i n e i c e a n d / o r a t g r a i n b o u n d a r i e s .
A s i s
obvious i n t h e f i g u r e , t h e l i n e width and t h e i n t e n s i t y v a r y w i t h t e m p e r a t u r e .
I ts h o u l d be n o t e d t h a t t h e l i n e w i d t h o f t h e spec-
trum a t -lO°C is a b o u t
7t i m e s t h a t o f o r d i n a r y w a t e r a t +5OC, which i s shown f o r comparison on t h e l e f t hand s i d e . The i n t e n s i t y o f t h e spectrum i s p r o p o r t i o n a l t o t h e number of t h e mobile molecules. The r e l a t i v e i n t e n s i t y , which i s normalized w i t h t h e i n t e n s i t y a t -5"C, and t h e l i n e width v a r i a t i o n w i t h t e m p e r a t u r e a r e shown i n Fig. 2 .
A st h e s u r f a c e a r e a was reduced by s i n t e r i n g i n o u r e x p e r i m e n t , t h e i n t e n s i t y , e s p e c i a l l y a t -5OC, i s e x p e c t e d t o be l a r g e r . Although t h e r e l a t i v e i n t e n s i t y l a r g e l y changed between -5OC and -lO°C, l i n e w i d t h v a r i a t i o n was q u i t e s m a l l .
2.
S p i n - l a t t i c e r e l a x a t i o n t i m e ( T 1 ) The s p i n l a t t i c e r e l a x a t i o n t i m e ,
TI, was measured by t h e i n v e r s i o n r e c o v e r y method a t v a r i o u s tempera-
t u r e s . F i g u r e 3 shows t h e r e l a t i o n s between TI and t h e t e m p e r a t u r e
f o r powder i c e p a r t i c l e s and a r e f r o z e n i c e , where e a c h p o i n t i s an av-
e r a g e o f t h r e e t i m e s measurements i n b o t h c a s e s . The r e f r o z e n i c e was made by m e l t i n g t h e powder i c e s l i g h t l y w i t h i n t h e c e l l and t h e r e a f t e r f r e e z i n g
i t
r a p i d l y a t below - 3 0 ' ~ . M i c r o s c o p i c a l o b s e r v a t i o n r e v e a l - e d t h a t a l a r g e number o f t i n y b u b b l e s s e v e r a l 10 pm i n d i a m e t e r were d i s p e r s e d u n i f o r m l y i n t h e sample.Figure 1. NMR spectra of the Q.L.L. ob- served a t 99.5 MHz. Signal of liquid water was taken a t +5OC. Notice the dif- ference in the line w i d t h between liquid water and the Q.L.L.
Figure 2. Intensity(so1id l i n e ) and line w i d t h variation(dotted l i n e ) w i t h temperature
The v a r i a n c e i n TI between t h e two samples r e f l e c t s some o f t h e dy- namical d i f f e r e n c e s e x p e c t e d t o be c a u s e d mainly by w a t e r vapor p r e s - s u r e around t h e i n n e r and t h e o u t e r s u r f a c e s . However, T I minimum a p p e a r e d around -35OC i n b o t h samples.
The s p i n l a t t i c e r e l a x a t i o n time T I f o r p r o t o n
i s
e x p r e s s e d i n t h e f o l l o w i n g form ( 1 3 ) ,where,
w, = F
Hoi s
t h e r e s o n a n t f r e q u e n c y , 7fi s
t h e gyromagnetic r a t i o ,r i s
t h e s p i n t o s p i n d i s t a n c e and Zi s
t h e c o r r e l a t i o n time f o r r o t a - t i o n a l m o l e c u l a r motion. The c o r r e l a t i o n t i m e a t - 3 5 O ~ was e v a l u a t e d t o be 9 . 6 x 1 0 - ~ ~ s e c from t h e c o n d i t i o n t h a t T ii s
minimum f o r woZ i s a b o u t 0.6. Using t h i s c o r r e l a t i o n t i m e , t h e s p i n t o s p i n d i s t a n c e , r , was e v a l u a t e d t o be a b o u t 1 . 6 6 ~ 1 0 - l om
and 1 . 4 1 ~ 1 0 - ~ ~m
f o r powder and r e f r o z e n i c e , r e s p e c t i v e l y . Assumingr
d o e s n o t change w i t h tempera- t u r e , ~ a t e a c h t e m p e r a t u r e c a n be o b t a i n e d by s u b s t i t u t i n g t h e c o r r e - sponding T1 i n t o e q . ( 1 ) . I n t h i s c a s e , woz<< 1 i s r e a s o n a b l y c o n s i d - e r e d a t h i g h e r t e m p e r a t u r e s andwof;)
1a t
lower t e m p e r a t u r e s compared t o t h e minimum p o i n t g i v e n i n F i g . 3.F i g u r e 4 i l l u s t r a t e s t h e c o r r e l a t i o n t i m e a t v a r i o u s t e m p e r a t u r e s , where t h e v a l u e a t O°C was c a l c u l a t e d by u s i n g T i a t
o0C,
which was o b t a i n e d by e x t r a p o l a t i n g s e v e r a l p o i n t s a t lower t e m p e r a t u r e s .JOURNAL
DE
PHYSIQUEa: powder ice(o) b: refrozen ice(.)
C 0
0 activation energy
a: 28.0 k~.mol.'
Figure 3 . Spin l a t t i c e relaxation time, Figure 4. Correlation time for rotation-
T I , VS. inverse temperature a l motion, Z
,
vs. inverse temperatureThe d i f f e r e n c e i n T f o r powder and r e f r o z e n i c e i s c o n s i d e r a b l y l a r g e n e a r t h e m e l t i n g p o i n t ; however,
i t
d e c r e a s e s a s t e m p e r a t u r e f a l l e s , and below -15OC, b o t h samples become a l m o s t e q u a l . The a c t i - v a t i o n energy f o r r o t a t i o n a l motion was 28.0 kJ/mol f o r powder i c e and 59.7 kJ/mol f o r r e f r o z e n i c e i n t h e t e m p e r a t u r e range o f 0 t o -50°C and 0 t o -15OC, r e s p e c t i v e l y .A s
i s
shown i n F i g . 4 , t h e c o r r e l a t i o n time o f t h e Q . L . L . i s i n t h e o r d e r o f 1 0 -I0 s e c , which i s much c l o s e r t o t h a t o f w a t e r o f 10-l2 s e c( 1 4 ) t h a n t h a t o f i c e c r y s t a l o f s e c ( l 5 ) . A s compared w i t h t h e c o r r e l a t i o n time of t h e Q . L . L . a t O°C and t h a t o f o r d i n a r y w a t e r , t h e Q.L.L. i s movable w i t h a f r e q u e n c y o f about 1 / 2 5 o f t h a t i n o r d i - n a r y w a t e r a t O°C.
3. D i f f u s i o n c o e f f i c i e n t For p r o t o n , whose n u c l e u s p o s s e s s e s s p i n 1 / 2 , t h e s p i n l a t t i c e r e l a x a t i o n time i n a r o t a t i n g f r a m e , T l p
,
i s r e l a t e d t o w l , t h e r a d i o f r e q u e n c y , and D , t h e s e l f d i f f u s i o n c o e f f i - c i e n t , a s f o l l o w s ( 1 6 ) :where N
i s
t h e number d e n s i t y o f r e s o n a n t n u c l e i . A s i s o b v i o u s i n e q . ( 2 1 ,i n
p l o t t i n g l / T l p v s . ~ $ 1 2 , t h e s l o p e g i v e s a s e l f d i f f u s i o n c o e f f i c i e n t , D. A t y p i c a l r e s u l t a t -lO°C i s shown i n F i g . 5. We o b t a i n e d t h e s e l f d i f f u s i o n c o e f f i c i e n t a t t e m p e r a t u r e s between -1.5"C a n d - 2 0 ° C . T h e r e s u l t s a r e l i s t e d i n T a b l e 1 , w h e r e e v e r y v a l u e i s a n a v e r a g e of t h r e e measurements a t e a c h t e m p e r a t u r e .A c t i v a t i o n e n e r g y f o r d i f f u s i o n by t r a n s l a t i o n a l motion was e v a l u - a t e d t o be 2 3 . 5 kJ/mol a s i s shown i n F i g . 6 . F o r comparison, t h e d i f - f u s i o n c o e f f i c i e n t i n a s i n g l e c r y s t a l by I t a g a k i ( l 7 ) , i n p o l y c r y s t a l - l i n e i c e by Kuhn and T h i i r k a u f ( l 8 ) and i n w a t e r ( l 4 ) a r e a l s o shown i n t h e same f i g u r e .
The a b s o l u t e v a l u e of t h e d i f f u s i o n c o e f f i c i e n t o f t h e Q . L . L .
i s
a b o u t f o u r o r d e r s of magnitude s m a l l e r t h a n t h a t o f w a t e r ; however,i t
i s r e m a r k a b l e t h a t t h i s v a l u e i s l a r g e r t h a n t h a t o f a s i n g l e c r y s t a l o f i c e by two o r d e r s . I n r e g a r d t o t h e a c t i v a t i o n e n e r g y f o r d i f f u s i o n , t h a tof t h e
Q.L.L. i ss l i g h t l y l a r g e r t h a n t h a t o f l i q u i d w a t e r b u t i s o n l y a b o u t a t h i r d of a s i n g l e c r y s t a l of i c e .
Table 1
Temperature D i f f u s i o n c o e f f i c i e n t
Figure 5. Tlpvariation with radio fre- quency at
-lO°C;
plotted1/Tlp
vs. w:/**rat*, (5-2O.C) D - Z ~ ~ O - * rnlsec"
18.9 rJ. moi'
'.,
single crystd(ref.17)'. '.,
63.1 ( 0 6 5 e V ) kI.mol1Figure 6. Diffusion coefficient of the Q.L.L. vs. inverse temperature
I V .
D i s c u s s i o n and Conclusion
The i n t e n s i t y o f t h e
NMR s i g n a l was l a r g e l y dependent on t h e p a r t i -c l e s i z e .
I nf a c t , i n o u r experiment u s i n g i c e p a r t i c l e s l a r g e r t h a n 200 pm i n d i a m e t e r , t h e s i n g n a l was s m a l l and f a i n t even a t -lO°C.
However, t h e s i z e o f an i n d i v i d u a l c r y s t a l i n an i c e p a r t i c l e was most- l y independent of t h e p a r t i c l e s between 50 and 500 pm i n d i a m e t e r . T h e r e f o r e t h e
NMRs i g n a l
i sc o n s i d e r e d t o be due mainly t o i n n e r o r o u t e r f r e e s u r f a c e s and t h e c o n t r i b u t i o n from g r a i n . b o u n d a r i e s seems t o be s m a l l i n t h i s c a s e . Undoubtedly, t h e e x i s t e n c e o f t h e mobile w a t e r phase a t g r a i n b o u n d a r i e s a t v e r y c l o s e t o t h e m e l t i n g p o i n t h a s been shown by Ohtomo and Wakahama(l9). F u r t h e r s t u d i e s a r e needed t o c l a r - i f y t h e d i f f e r e n c e between t h e dynamical p r o p e r t i e s o f a f r e e s u r f a c e and of a g r a i n boundary, because molecules a t t h e g r a i n boundary a r e e x p e c t e d t o have a h i g h e r c r y s t a l l i n i t y t h a n t h o s e i n a f r e e s u r f a c e .
A s
t h e s u r f a c e a r e a d e c r e a s e s due t o s i n t e r i n g between i c e p a r -
t i c l e s , t h e i n t e n s i t y v a r i a t i o n w i t h t e m p e r a t u r e does n o t c o r r e s p o n d t o
t h e t h i c k n e s s v a r i a t i o n o f t h e
Q . L . L .w i t h t e m p e r a t u r e . R e g a r d l e s s o f
C1-516 JOURNAL D E PHYSIQUE
t h e l a r g e v a r i a t i o n o f t h e i n t e n s i t y between -5OC and -lO°C, t h e l i n e width d o e s n o t change v e r y much. T h i s f a c t s u g g e s t s t h a t t h e t h i c k - n e s s o f t h e Q.L.L. changes l a r g e l y w i t h i n t h i s t e m p e r a t u r e range ; however, v e r y s m a l l changes o c c u r i n t h e dynamical p r o p e r t i e s .
I n o u r e x p e r i m e n t , t h e NMR s i g n a l due t o t h e mobile molecules
a t
t h e s u r f a c e was observed even a t a t e m p e r a t u r e o f a s low a s - l O O ° C . This f i n d i n g i n d i c a t e s t h a t some s u r f a c e molecules can r o t a t e a t a much h i g h e r f r e q u e n c y t h a n i n b u l k i c e even a t - l O O e C , however, i t should n o t be c o n s i d e r e d t h a t t h e Q.L.L.s t i l l
remains a t such a low t e m p e r a t u r e .The number o f mobile m o l e c u l e s
is
dependent n o t o n l y on t h e tem- p e r a t u r e b u t a l s o on t h e degree of t h e p e r f e c t i o n and t h e c r y s t a l l o g - r a p h i c o r i e n t a t i o n o f t h e s u r f a c e . Our r e s u l t d i f f e r s l a r g e l y from t h e e l l i p s o m e t r i c a l o b s e r v a t i o n (11) o f t h e t e m p e r a t u r e a t which t h e mobile phase a p p e a r s . The d i f f e r e n c ei s
c a u s e d mainly by t h e d i f f e r - ence i n t h e power o f d e t e c t i o n o f each e x p e r i m e n t a l method t h a n by t h e d i f f e r e n c e i n t h e sample. The q u e s t i o n "how many mobile m o l e c u l e s make t h e s u r f a c e v e r y l i q u i d - l i k e ?I1 can n o t be answered from t h e r e - s u l t s o f o u r experiment u s i n g NMR; however, t h i s method does p r o v i d e i n f o r m a t i o n on t h e s u r f a c e molecule motion.I t was found t h a t t h e m o l e c u l e s a t t h e s u r f a c e r o t a t e a t
a
f r e - quency o f about f i v e o r d e r s l a r g e r t h a n t h a t o f c r y s t a l l i n e i c e a t t e m p e r a t u r e s between 0 t o -20°C, and t h i s f r e q u e n c y c o r r e s p o n d s t o only a b o u t 1 / 2 5 o f t h a t o f a molecule i n l i q u i d w a t e r .Regarding d i f f u s i o n by t h e t r a n s l a t i o n a l motion, t h e s u r f a c e mole- c u l e d i f f u s e s
a t
a r a t e o f a b o u t two o r d e r s l a r g e r t h a n t h a t i n b u l k i c e . I t can be concluded t h a t t h e s u r f a c e molecule p o s s e s s e s some p r o p e r t i e s which a r e much c l o s e r t o t h o s e o f l i q u i d w a t e r t h a n t o t h o s e o f c r y s t a l l i n e i c e , b u t t h e y a r e a p p a r e n t l y d i f f e r e n t from t h o s e of l i q u i d w a t e r even a t t e m p e r a t u r e s v e r y c l o s e t o t h e m e l t i n g p o i n t .The a c t i v a t i o n e n e r g y b o t h f o r t h e r o t a t i o n a l and t h e t r a n s l a - t i o n a l motion o f t h e s u r f a c e molecule a p p e a r t o be l o c a t e d between t h o s e o f l i q u i d w a t e r and c r y s t a l l i n e i c e .
R e f e r e n c e s
Nakaya,U. and Matsumoto,A. U.S.Army Snow,Ice and P e r m a f r o s t Res. R e p t . , 4 (1953) pp 1-6
Wey1,W.A. J . C o l l o i d S c i . , 6 (1951) 389-405
Jellinek,H.H.G. J . C o l l o i d a n 3 I n t e r f a c e S c i . , 25 (1967) 192-205 Fletcher,N.H. P h i l . Mag.,
18
(1968) 1 2 8 7 - 1 z 0Nason,D. and F l e t c h e r , N . H . J.Chem.Phys.,
62
( 1 9 7 5 ) 4444-4449 G o l e c k i , I . and J a c c a r d , C . J.Phys. C : S o l i d S t a t e Phys.,11
(1978) 4229-4237
Kvlividze,V.I.,Kiselev,V.F., Kurzaev,A.B. and Ushakova,L.A.
S u r f a c e S c i . ,
9
(1974) 60-68Anderson,D.M. CRREL Res.Rept., No. 274 (1970) pp 1-17
Bell.J.D.,Mvatt,R.W. and Richards,R.E. Nature, P h y s i c a l S c i . ,
239, .
22 . ( i 9 7 ij
91-92Ocampo,J. and K l i n g e r , J . J.Phys. Chem., 87 ( 1 9 8 3 ) 4325-4328 Furukawa,Y., Kuroda,T. and Yamamoto,M. J.>e Physique, T h i s . -
i s s u e (1987)
Kuroda,T. and Lacmann,R. J . C r y s t a 1 Growth, 56 (1982) 189-205 Abragam,A. i n " The P r i n c i p l e o f Nuclear ~ a g n e E c Resonancet1 Oxford a t t h e Claremdon P r e s s . (1961)
E i s e n b e r g , D . and Kauzmann,W. i n The S t r u c t u r e and P r o p e r t i e s o f Water Oxford Univ. P r e s s . (1969)
Auty,R.P. and Cole,R.H. J.Chem.Phys., 20 (1952) 1309-1314
B u r n e t t , L . J . and Harmon,J.F. J.Chem.phy= 57 ( 1 9 7 2 ) 1293-1297 I t a g a k i , K . J . P h y s . S o c . J a p a n ,
2
(1967) 427-431Kuhn,W. and Thurkauf,M. Helv. Chim. A c t a ,
2
(1958) 938-971Ohtomo,M. and Wakahama,G. J.Phys.Chem.,
87
(1983) 4139-4142COMMENTS