HAL Id: jpa-00223717
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/jpa-00223717
Submitted on 1 Jan 1984
HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.
L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.
DESIGN OF THE DIPOLE MAGNETS FOR ORBIT CORRECTION IN LEP
Ph. Lebrun
To cite this version:
Ph. Lebrun. DESIGN OF THE DIPOLE MAGNETS FOR ORBIT CORRECTION IN LEP. Journal de Physique Colloques, 1984, 45 (C1), pp.C1-305-C1-308. �10.1051/jphyscol:1984161�. �jpa-00223717�
JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE
Colloque C1, suppl&ment au n o 1, Tome 45, janvier 1984 page C1-305
DESIGN OF T H E DIPOLE MAGNETS FOR O R B I T CORRECTION IN LEP
Ph. L e b r u n
LEP Division, C. E. R. N., 121 1 Geneva 23, SwitzerZand
R6sume
-
Le r6seau magn6tique du LEP c o n t i e n t 520 6lectro-aimants d i p o l a i r e s de c o r r e c t i o n d ' o r b i t e dans l e s plans h o r i z o n t a l e t v e r t i c a l . La geom6trie des c i r c u i t s magnitiques e t l e s c a r a c t 6 r i s t i q u e s des bobines d ' e x c i t a t i o n o n t 6 t 6 c h o i s i e s pour l e u r a p t i t u d e 2 repondre efficacement e t 6conomiquement au ca- h i e r des charges (niveau e t q u a l i t 6 du champ) t o u t en respectant l e s c o n t r a i n - t e s techniques impos6es par l e s grandes dimensions du LEP. Du f a i t de l a gamme de fonctionnement 6tendue des aimants, l a r e d u c t i o n des e f f e t s d 8 h y s t 6 r 6 s i s a s u s c i t 6 des e f f o r t s p a r t i c u l i e r s , conduisant 1 imposer des tolerances serrees s u r l e champ c o e r c i t i f de l ' a c i e r u t i l i s 6 . Les r 6 s u l t a t s de mesures e l e c t r i - ques, thermi ques e t magngtiques s u r des mod51 es d'aimants sont prGsent6s.A b s t r a c t
-
The magnetic l a t t i c e o f LEP c o n t a i n s 520 d i p o l e electromagnets f o r v e r t i c a l and h o r i z o n t a l o r b i t c o r r e c t i o n . The choice o f magnetic c i r c u i t geo- metry and e x c i t a t i o n c o i l c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s , which s a t i s f y t h e f i e l d r e q u i r e - ments and tolerances as w e l l as t h e t e c h n i c a l boundary c o n d i t i o n s imposed by t h e l a r g e s i z e o f LEP, i s discussed w i t h r e s p e c t t o achievable performance, economics and f e a s i b i l i t y . Owing t o the wide o p e r a t i n g range o f t h e magnets, p a r t i c u l a r emphasis i s p u t on t h e r e d u c t i o n o f h y s t e r e s i s e f f e c t s , which de- termines t i g h t c o n s t r a i n t s on t h e c o e r c i v i t y o f t h e s t e e l . Results o f elec- t r i c a l , thermal and magnetic measurements on model magnets a r e presented.INTRODUCTION
Closed o r b i t d i s t o r t i o n s i n c i r c u l a r a c c e l e r a t o r s and storage r i n g s increase w i t h t h e number o f components, and hence t h e s i z e o f t h e machine. The l a t t i c e o f LEP c o n t a i n s about 4700 bending and focusing magnets [ l l ; random f i e l d e r r o r s o r misalignments produce d i s t o r t i o n s o f t h e closed o r b i t s , which may exceed t h e a p e r t u r e and l i m i t t h e performance o f t h e machine. An e f f i c i e n t o r b i t c o r r e c t i o n system i s , therefore, es- s e n t i a l t o speed up commissioning, o b t a i n e a r l y c i r c u l a t i n g beams, and 1 a t e r optimize o p e r a t i n g conditions. This system i n v o l v e s beam p o s i t i o n monitoring, data transmis- s i o n and processing [21, and c o n t r o l o f the power supplies [ 3 1 feeding t h e c o r r e c t i o n d i p o l e magnets. Although o n l y the l a t t e r are discussed here, t h e i r design i s con- s i s t e n t w i t h t h e g l o b a l requirements o f t h e system.
BASIC REQUIREMENTS
The t o t a l number o f c o r r e c t i o n d i p o l e s r e s u l t s from the d e s i r e d q u a l i t y o f o r b i t cor- r e c t i o n : a n a l y t i c a l c a l c u l a t i o n s [41 show t h a t about t h r e e c o r r e c t o r s p e r b e t a t r o n wavelength g i v e a good c o r r e c t i o n q u a l i t y . I n LEP, t h i s amounts t o about 260 inde- pendent c o r r e c t i o n d i p o l e s i n each transverse plane. For each magnet type, a l a r g e s e r i e s i s r e q u i r e d so t h a t c a r e f u l o p t i m i z a t i o n o f t h e design i s expected t o r e s u l t i n s i g n i f i c a n t o v e r a l l economy.
The magnets must be s t r o n g enough t o c o r r e c t t h e closed o r b i t g l o b a l l y and compensate l o c a l l y the d i s t o r t i o n s produced by quadrupole misalignments o f 1 mm a t maximum beam
Article published online by EDP Sciences and available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/jphyscol:1984161
CI-306 JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE
Table 1
-
Requirements f o r LEP c o r r e c t i o n d i p o l e magnetsenergy. Moreover, t h e c o r r e c t i o n d i p o l e s w i l l be used t o produce l o c a l bumps f o r scanning t h e a p e r t u r e a t i n j e c t i o n energy. The t i g h t e s t c r i t e r i o n d e f i n e s t h e r e - quirements on f i e l d i n t e g r a l [ 2 1 l i s t e d i n Table 1.
The maximum f i e l d inhomogeneity acceptable i n t h e u s e f u l r e g i o n s o f t h e apertures, deduced from the f i e l d t o l e r a n c e i n t h e main d i p o l e magnets, i s 0.75 %. Larger values can be accepted a t h i g h e x c i t a t i o n s o f t h e magnets, mainly used f o r scanning bumps.
Furthermore, t h e s e t t i n g e r r o r s must be small enough t o have n e g l i g i b l e c o n t r i b u t i o n s t o t h e r e s i d u a l o r b i t , r e s u l t i n g i n a maximum absolute e r r o r o f 2 10-5 T m. Combining both requirements r e s u l t s i n t h e g l o b a l t o l e r a n c e s C51 o f Fig. 2; a good f i e l d qua1 i- t y i s r e q u i r e d throughout t h e o p e r a t i n g range, i n c l u d i n g a t low e x c i t a t i o n s where one has t o cope w i t h n o n - l i n e a r e f f e c t s i n the magnetic p r o p e r t i e s of t h e s t e e l .
MCHA 88 0.036 102 400 t 59 t 19
The gaps o f t h e c o r r e c t i o n d i p o l e s must be s u f f i c i e n t t o accommodate the LEP vacuum chamber, equipped w i t h l e a d s h i e l d i n g and bakeout i n s u l a t i o n , and a l l o w i n g f o r f a b r i - c a t i o n and alignment tolerances. L o n g i t u d i n a l space being l i m i t e d i n LEP, t h e l e n g t h o f t h e magnetic c i r c u i t s has been s e t a t 0.4 m, r e s u l t i n g i n r a t h e r s h o r t magnets where end e f f e c t s become important.
Magnet type Number
Maximum f i e l d i n t e g r a l ET m l
Gap [mml
Length o f magnetic c i r c u i t [mml H o r i z o n t a l u s e f u l a p e r t u r e [mml V e r t i c a l u s e f u l a p e r t u r e [mml
The c o r r e c t i o n d i p o l e s w i l l be i n d i v i d u a l l y e x c i t e d by b i p o l a r power s u p p l i e s through cables running along t h e machine tunnel. Environmental c o n d i t i o n s d u r i n g o p e r a t i o n of LEP w i l l be c h a r a c t e r i z e d by s t r o n g i o n i z i n g synchrotron r a d i a t i o n from t h e c i r c u l a t - i n g beams and a i r temperatures ranging up t o 38°C.
MCV 176 0.019 200 400 f 35 t 33
MCH 168 0.029 102 400 f 59 t 19
MAGNETIC CIRCUITS
MCVA 88 0.031 200 400 f 46 f 33
Once t h e l e n g t h o f t h e magnets has been f i x e d , optimal design c o n s i s t s i n f i n d i n g a d i s t r i b u t i o n o f e x c i t a t i o n c o i l s and magnetic yoke prod11 -7g t h e d e s i r e d f i e l d l e v e l and q u a l i t y , w h i l e m i n i m i z i n g t h e transverse dimensions, .td hence the c o s t o f the magnets. Several p o t e n t i a l l y s u i tab1 e geometries have been i n v e s t i g a t e d [ 6 1 and t h e i r r e l a t i v e e f f i c i e n c i e s compared on t h e b a s i s o f common requirements (Fig. 1). The U- shaped s o l u t i o n , r e q u i r i n g h a l f t h e conductor mass o f t h e others, appears t o be t h e most economical. F i e l d homogeneity i n the u s e f u l a p e r t u r e i s achieved by a p p r o p r i a t e shimming o f t h e p o l e pieces, a d j u s t e d by measurements on model magnets (Fig. 21.
Due t o simple geometry and slow ramping rates, i t was f i r s t thought t o use p l a t e s o f commercially pure ( "Armco" ) i r o n o r c o n s t r u c t i o n s t e e l . However, such m a t e r i a l s ex- h i b i t c o e r c i v i t i e s o f 100 A m - 1 and above, g i v i n g r i s e t o remanence i n t h e magnet
C O N V E N T I O N A L WINDOW-FRAME , WINDOW-FRAME, U-SHAPED
D I P O L E RACETRACK C O I L S B E D S T E A D C O I L S
Fig. 1
-
D i f f e r e n t geometries considered f o r LEP c o r r e c t i o n d i p o l e magnetsat half operture
- - - / - - B i i T r n l - + L -_---
001 0 0 2 0 03
Fig. 2
-
F i e l d q u a l i t y i n MCV and MCVA magnets Fig. 3-
MCVA magnet model apertures ( t y p i c a l l y 2 T m f o r MCH) exceeding t h e t o l e r a n c e on absolute f i e l d p r e c i s i o n . Consequently, t h e need f o r low c o e r c i v e f i e l d and low d i s p e r s i o n i n coer- c i v i t y l e d t o s e l e c t a standard non-oriented s i l ic o n s t e e l (FeV 135-50 according t o EURONORM 106-71). Magnetic measurements on samples o f s i l ic o n s t e e l s a v a i l a b l e from i n d u s t r y have shown t h a t r e p r o d u c i b l e c o e r c i v i t y values of 40 -1. 5 A m-l can be ex- pected. As a r e s u l t , t h e remanent f i e l d i n t e g r a l s i n f u l l - s c a l e model magnets were measured t o be 2 10-5 T m and 5 T m f o r t h e MCV and MCH types, r e s p e c t i v e l y .The choice o f s i l ic o n s t e e l imposes a
Fig. 4
-
MCHA magnet model1 aminated construction. For t h e sake o f s c a l e economy, o n l y two types o f magnetic c i r c u i t s have been designed, one common t o MCV and MCVA, and t h e o t h e r common t o MCH and MCHA magnets
(Figs. 3 and 4). Each c i r c u i t i s made o f two stacks o f L-shaped laminations, glued t o g e t h e r w i t h epoxy r e s i n . The mechanical p r e c i s i o n r e q u i r e d by t h e d e s i r e d f i e l d q u a l i t y i s ensured by t h e c l o s e to1 erances on t h e punched 1 aminations (0.02 mm) and on t h e glued stacks, h e l d together by means o f an e x t e r n a l A1 - a l l o y frame and s t a i n l e s s s t e e l t i e - b o l t s which guarantee t h e p r e c i s e a p e r t u r e o f t h e magnet gaps.
EXCITATION COILS
The choice o f c u r r e n t d e n s i t y i n magnet windings u s u a l l y r e s u l t s from m i n i m i z a t i o n o f c a p i t a l and i n t e g r a t e d o p e r a t i o n costs. The l a t t e r can be neglected i n t h e case o f c o r r e c t i o n magnets, expected t o have a low r.m.s. e x c i t a t i o n l e v e l . For t h e magnets i n t h e machine a r c s (MCV and MCH), t h e d e f i n i t i o n o f c u r r e n t d e n s i t i e s r e s u l t s from t h e cab1 i n g l e n g t h s (up t o 1900 m) imposed by t h e l a y o u t and t h e 1 im i t e d v o l t a g e (de- s i g n value 120 V) a v a i l a b l e a t the power supply terminals: s a t i s f y i n g these c o n f l i c t - i n g requirements leads t o low design currents. I n t h i s range, m i n i m i z i n g the t o t a l c o s t o f t h e system a l s o minimizes t h e mass o f conductor i n t h e c a b l e and e x c i t a t i o n c o i l [61. This c o n d i t i o n leads t o t h e s e t s o f c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s i n Table 2, based on c u r r e n t l y a v a i l a b l e cross-sections o f copper w i r e s and cables. The use of aluminium conductor has n o t been considered due t o the 1 ack o f commercially a v a i l a b l e products.
C1-308 JOURNAL D E PHYSIQUE
Table 2
-
C h a r a c t e r i s t i c s o f LEP c o r r e c t i o n d i p o l e magnetsThe moderate c u r r e n t d e n s i t i e s i n t h e MCV and MCH c o i l s r e s u l t i n low power
densities.Calculations 161 and meas- thermal llmlt olr cooled to11
urements on models have shown t h a t the b u l k thermal c o n d u c t i v i t y o f t h e c o i l s allows them t o be cooled from t h e i r s u r f a c e only. Moreover, t h e low abso- I5O 1 u t e values o f power d i s s i p a t i o n sug- gested a i r cooling. A surface thermal r e s i s t a n c e o f about 0.15 K W - 1 was measured on model c o i l s f i t t e d w i t h black anodized f i n n e d a1 uminium pro- f i l e s glued on t h e i r o u t e r surface. l o o For t h e MCV and MCH magnets, t h i s per- m i t s n a t u r a l convection i n a i r t o keep the maximum c o i l temperatures be1 ow 70°C i n t h e worst o p e r a t i n g condi- t i o n s . MCVA and MCHA magnets, l o c a t e d i n t h e a c c e l e r a t i o n r e g i o n s o f LEP, 50 a r e stronger b u t can accept higher c u r r e n t d e n s i t y because o f s h o r t e r cables, r e s u l t i n g i n h i g h e r power d i s - s i p a t i o n which r e q u i r e s water c o o l i n g (Fig. 5).
Copper w i r e o f round cross-section, o 1 2 3 L 5 6
i n s u l a t e d w i t h a polyamide-imide ena- Fig. 5
-
Working l i n e s o f LEP me1 o f thermal c l a s s H, i s used t o c o r r e c t i o n dip01 e magnets wind t h e c o i l s , l a t e r impregnated un-der vacuum w i t h an epoxy r e s i n . I n s u l a t i o n t o ground i s ensured by g l a s s - f i b r e epoxy c o i l formers and g l a s s - f i b r e tape.
Magnet type
Number o f t u r n s i n c o i l
Nominal w i r e diameter [mml
Maximum e x c i t a t i o n c u r r e n t [A]
Maximum power d i s s i p a t i o n C W I E l e c t r i c a l r e s i s t a n c e o f c o i l a t 20°C [Q]
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
B. Jean-Prost and J.L. Servais c o n t r i b u t e d t o t h e design and c o n s t r u c t i o n o f t h e mo- del magnets, l a t e r measured by G. Brun. S t i m u l a t i n g discussions w i t h J.P. Gourber, 6. Guignard, L. Resegotti and C. Wyss are g r a t e f u l l y acknowledged.
MCV 2420
1.6 2.5 160
21.2
111 RESEGOTTI L., Inv. paper t o t h i s Conference (1E2-01).
[ 2 1 BORER J. e t a1
.,
LEP Note 437 (1983)-
unpublished.L31, ISCH H.W., Proc. . 5 t h I n t . PC1 Conf., Geneva (1982) 278.
[43 GUIGNARD E., CERN 70-24 (1970).
151 GUIGNARD G., CERN LEP-THL83-38
-
presented a t 1 2 t h I n t . Conf. on High-Energy Acc., Batavia, I L (August 1983).C61 LEBRUN Ph., LEP Note 332 (1981)
-
unpublished.MCH 2050
1.5 2.5 150
20.4
MCVA 1980
1.9 5.0 320
12.3
MCHA 1300
1.9 5.0 210
8.1