HAL Id: jpa-00220538
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/jpa-00220538
Submitted on 1 Jan 1980
HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of
sci-entific research documents, whether they are
pub-lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.
L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.
COOPERATIVE IONIC MOTION IN LIQUID
METALS
T. Gaskell, P. Mason
To cite this version:
JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE ColZoque C8, suppldment
au
n08, Tome 41,aoCt
1980,page
C8-330
COOPERATIVE I O N I C M O T I O N
I N
L I Q U I DMETALS
T. Gaskell and P.E. Mason
P h y s i c s Department, t h e U n i v e r s i t y , S h e f f i e l d , U.K. 1
.
ZNTRODUCTION Theorles of v e l o c l t y c o r r e l a t i o n s i n l i q u i d s have i n v a r i a b l y been r e s t r i c t e d t o t h e a u t o c o r r e l a t i o n f u n c t i o n of e i t h e r t h e s i n g l e p a r t i c l e v e l o c i t y o r a F o u r i e r component of t h e c u r r e n t d e n s i t y . Both a r e important f o r a number of r e a s o n s , n o t l e a s t of which i s t h a t t h e y a r e i n p r i n c i p l e a c c e s s i b l e through n e u t r o n s c a t t e r i n g experiments. However, t h e y do n o t n e c e s s a r i l y c o n t a i n a l l t h e u s e f u l i n f ormat l o n one might seek from a knowledge of t h e way i nwhich t h e v e l o c i t i e s of atoms i n a l i q u i d a r e c o r r e l a t e d . We demonstrate t h i s by u s i n g a configuration-dependent v e l o c i t y f i e l d t o d i s c u s s
t h e way i n which t h e i n i t i a l momentum of an atom i n t h e l l q u i d i s t r a n s f e r r e d t o t h e surrounding medium. T h i s approach may be used t o d e r i v e an
expression f o r t h e v e l o c l t y a u t o c o r r e l a t i o n f u n c t i c n , b u t a l s o a l l o w s f o r cooperative e f f e c t s , such a s t h e coherent motion w i t h i n a c l u s t e r of atoms, t o be mvestiga-ked. The v e l o c i t y f i e l d ,
2*(x,t)
,
which t a k e s i n t o account t h e f i n i t e s l z e of t h e atoms, i s r e p r e s e n t e d by an e x p r e s s i o n of t h e form ft
=C?L;(t)
f(~:-:~:;(t)l)
1% i sk ( - ,
argued t h a t t h e v e l o c i t y f i e l d should be e s s e n t i a l l y c o n s t a n t a c r o s san
atomic d i a m e t e rand
f (f)
1s chosen a c c o r d i n g l y . ' I n a d d i t i o n it should s a t i s f y t h e c o n d i t i o n ,where
n
i s t h e number d e n s i t y , which g u a r a n t e e st h e c o r r e c t s t r u c t u r e of t h e v e l o c i t y f i e l d i n t h e hydrodynamic l i m i t . Momentum t r a n s f e r may be c o n v e n i e n t l y c o n s i d e r e d through t h e time-dependent c o r r e l a t i o n of t h e v e l o c i t y of an atom ( l a b e l l e d 1 )
a t
t
= O
,
w i t h t h a t of t h e c e n t r e of mas: of a group of atoms w i t h i n a sphere whose c e n t r e i s t h e l o c a t i o n of t h e same atom a t some l a t e r time. This c o r r e l a t i o n f u n c t i o n c l e a r l y i n c l u d e s ac o n t r i b u t i o n from t h e a u t o c o r r e l a t i o n term, and a s t h e l a t t e r decays with ti^, t h e c o r r e l a t i o n of t h e i n t i t i a l v e l o c i t y of atom 1 w i t h t h e vel-ocity of t h e surrounding s h e l l s of atoms b u i l d s up from z e r o w l t h t h e t r a n s f e r of t h e i n i t i a l momentum of p a r t i c l e 1 t o t h e surrounding medlum. I n a group of f i n i t e s i z e t h e l a t t e r correlation w l l l i t s e l f e v e n t u a l l y decay as t h e momentum t r a n s f e r spreads. The c h a r a c t e r i s t i c f e a t u r e s of such c o r r e l a t i o n s w i l l give some i n s i g h t i n t o any s t r o n g l y c o r r e l a t e d motlon which may e x i s t w i t h i n
a c l u s t e r .
2.
THEORY
The atomic v e l o c i t i e s a r e o b t a i n e d by e v a l u a t i n g t h e v e l o c i t y f i e l d at t h e l o c a t i o n of t h e atom. Hence, b e a r i n g i n mind ( 1
)
,
t h e sun of t h e atomic v e l o c i t i e s ,s(b)
,
w i t h i n a sphere of r a d i u sR
c e n t r e d a tTi(t)
1s o b t a i n e d by i n t e g r a t i o n of t h e v e l o c i t y f i e l d . Theref o r eI'igure
3.
The s o l i d curve shows(1.5
U,t)
minus t h e a u t o c o r r e l a t i o n term, f o r rubidium. The open c i r c l e s r e p r e s e n t t h e v e l o c i t y a u t o c o r r e l a t i o n f u n c t i o n
q ( t )
.
!
t r a n s f e r r e d t o t h e i o n s i n t h e f i r s t s h e l l v a r i e sw i t h time
in
much t h e same way as t h ea u t o c o r r e l a t i o n f u n c t i o n . T h i s i s more c l e a r l y demonstrated when t h e a u t o c o r r e l a t i o n c o n t r i b u t i o n
i s s u b t r a c t e d from
Qd(I.50)t).
The r e s u l t i s shown i n f i g u r e3.
It s t r o n g l y s u g g e s t s ap h y s i c a l p i c t u r e of an i o n rebounding from t h e
f i r s t s h e l l , w i t h t h e c e n t r e of mass of t h e s h e l l i t s e l f i n o s c i l l a t o r y motion, though o u t of phase
w i t h t h e i o n a t i t s c e n t r e . It should be remembered t h a t i n t h i s approach t h e c o r r e l a t i o n of p a r t i c l e 1 i s w i t h t h a t of t h e c e n t r e of mass
of t h e n e a r e s t neighbours. Consequently, our p r e v i o u s statement should n o t be t a k e n t o imply a
s h e l l of i o n s moving a s a r i g i d u n i t . We would Deed t o see t h e a n g u l a r c o r r e l a t i o n w i t h r e s p e c t J;o c e n t r a l p a r t i c l e ' s i n i t i a l d i r e c t i o n of motion t o t e s t t h a t concept. N e v e r t h e l e s s , t h e r e Bppears t o be s t r o n g l y c o o r d i n a t e d behaviour. p g u r e
4.
The c u r v e s show r e s u l t s f o r I$( R ,
t )
hf!in a r i g i d
-
sphere f l u i d . The open c l r o l e s/
r e p r e s e n t t h e v e l o c i t y a u t o c o r r e l a t i o n f u n c t i o nY(6
Facking f r a c t i o n 0.4628,
k
in mean collis;oi? time.
,Although qd(2.5G,b)a1so d i s p l a y s an o s c i l l a t o r y decay, it i s c l e a r t h a t
$,
(2.5
u ) t )
-
$N(1.5c,t)
w i l l n o t show any s i g n i f i c a n t o s c i l l a t o r y p a t t e r n . T h i s i s presumably because of t h e c o n s i d e r a b l e combined i n e r t i a l mass of t h e second s h e l l neighbours. Contrast t h e s e r e s u l t s w i t h t h o s e i n
f i g u r e
4.
When R i n c l u d e s t h e n e a r neighbours,H,(g,t)
shows no t r a c e of t h e n e g a t i v e r e g i o np r e s e n t i n
y(r(t).
T h i s emphasi s e s t h e caging e f f e c t i n Rb. There, we argue t h a t a s an i o n c o l l i d e s w i t ha neighbour t h e momentum t r a n s f e r , because o f t h e s t r o n g cohesion, i s w i t h a s i g n i f i c a n t p a r t of t h e s h e l l , c a u s i n g t h e i o n t o rebound from t h e g r e a t e r mass. T h i s e f f e c t i s a b s e n t w i t h r i g i d s p h e r e s , c o n s i d e r a b l y reducing t h e p r o b a b i l i t y of a rebound.
REFERENCES
1 GASKELL,T and
MILLER,S
,J .F'hys. C . ~ ( I 978) 37492 4839