• Aucun résultat trouvé

Processing and Properties of Steel Foam Sandwiches

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Processing and Properties of Steel Foam Sandwiches"

Copied!
24
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Vous avez des questions? Nous pouvons vous aider. Pour communiquer directement avec un auteur, consultez la

première page de la revue dans laquelle son article a été publié afin de trouver ses coordonnées. Si vous n’arrivez pas à les repérer, communiquez avec nous à PublicationsArchive-ArchivesPublications@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca.

Questions? Contact the NRC Publications Archive team at

PublicationsArchive-ArchivesPublications@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca. If you wish to email the authors directly, please see the first page of the publication for their contact information.

https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/droits

L’accès à ce site Web et l’utilisation de son contenu sont assujettis aux conditions présentées dans le site LISEZ CES CONDITIONS ATTENTIVEMENT AVANT D’UTILISER CE SITE WEB.

READ THESE TERMS AND CONDITIONS CAREFULLY BEFORE USING THIS WEBSITE.

https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/copyright

NRC Publications Archive Record / Notice des Archives des publications du CNRC :

https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/view/object/?id=cd1fee50-7760-41cd-a514-f5386ca177a9 https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/voir/objet/?id=cd1fee50-7760-41cd-a514-f5386ca177a9

NRC Publications Archive

Archives des publications du CNRC

Access and use of this website and the material on it are subject to the Terms and Conditions set forth at

Processing and Properties of Steel Foam Sandwiches

(2)

Processing and properties of steel

foam sandwiches

L.P.Lefebvre1, M.Gauthier1, E.Baril1, B.Voizelle2 1National Research Council Canada/Industrial Materials Institute

(3)

National Research

Council Canada

Institutes

(4)

Scope

– Introduction – Process

– Results

• Part 1: Effect of density and composition on the compressive properties of the foams

• Part 2: Effect of the foam and face sheet properties on the properties of steel foam sandwiches

(5)

Steel foams

sandwiches

• Lightweight structures

• Improved rigidity

• Energy absorption (i.e. improved crashworthiness)Vibration absorption…

• Challenge:

– To produce highly porous structures at low cost – Capability to produce large panels

• Simple process

• Inexpensive starting materials • PM Avoid densification steps

(6)

IMI process

L. P.Lefebvre, Y. Thomas, Method of Making Open Cell Material, US Patent 6,660,224 B2, Dec. 9, 2003.

• No compaction required • Open porosity • Porosity 50-93% Ceramic Bronze Titanium Nickel Copper Steel Iron Debinding

(7)

Material

• Diffusion bonded steel premixes (FD-0400) • Screened -325 mesh

• 9.5%Ni, 5%Cu, 0.5%Mo and 0.15%Mn

• Admixed with phenolic resin and foaming agent. • Foaming @ 110°C

• Debinding at 500°C in air • Sintering at 1200°C in H2

• Cementation treatment: 30 min at 900°C using cracked Vapocarb fluid (Lindberg), cooled to RT in Ar

• Tempering 800°C/H2

(8)

Structure, dimensions

and density along

processing steps

Foamed  Debinded 20.2% Debinded  Sintered 25.5% Foamed  Sintered 40.5%

(9)
(10)

Effect of composition:

Compression

x,y

E =d /d

(11)

Compressive properties

(12)

Compressive

properties: Foams

Energy absorbed at

(13)

Effect of

composition: Energy

Before cementation After cementation

(14)

Sandwich panels

Foaming Debinding Sintering/ Heat Treatment

Finishing

Connector plates:

• Help handling the foam during processing • Perforation helps binder removal

(15)

Sandwich panels and

Profiles

(16)

Composite

sandwiches

Steel foam

Steel sheet Twintex

Twintex:

PP/Glass roving (60%) Density: 1.89 g/cm3

Tensile strength: 960 MPa Tensile modulus: 38.5 GPa Flexural strength: 860 MPa Flexural modulus: 37.5 GPa

(17)

Density

Steel Foam Sandw ich ich/Tw intex D en s it y (g/c m 3 ) 0 2 4 6 8 10

(18)

Compressive

properties

Foam vs sandwich

(19)

Mechanical properties

FD-0400 (cemented)

ich 2 g /cm3 0.71 g/cm 3 m 2 g /cm3* x, y ( M Pa) 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 * Extrapolated ich 2 g/ cm3 0.71 g/cm 3 m 2 g/ cm3* M odulus ( M Pa) 0 200 400 600 800

(20)

Compressive

properties:

(21)

Flexion

3 points bending

Foam density: 0.66 g/cm3 Sandwich density: 2.04 g/cm3

Density with composite: 2.17 g/cm3 Span: 140 mm

Length: 190 mm Width: 33 mm Thickness: 10 mm

(22)

Conclusion…

• Simple process to produce iron-based foams and foam sandwiches

• Foam density around 0.65g/cm3 (i.e. porosity

around 93%)

• Pins contribute to increase the modulus, the yield strength and the energy at densification.

• Properties of the core and face sheets have an impact on the compressive and flexural properties

(23)

Future work

• Optimization of the foam composition and

microstructure to further improve the mechanical properties

• Evaluation of different face sheets to improve the specific properties of the materials

• Process optimization, scale-up • Validation in applications

(24)

Références

Documents relatifs

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des

Therefore we have made a series of experiments in order to clarify the effect of ultrasonic vibration on the metallurgical and mechanical properties of low carbon aluminwn-

Leur singularité réside dans le traitement du fantastique puisque le conte semble ici témoigner d’une représentation de la vie psychique conçue comme le lieu d’un refoulement

The present thesis will focus on the role of culture in architecture and urbanism. The new environment should represent the identity of its inhabitants and the coherence of exist-

Therefore, the low binding effects measured using cells’ viability was specific to Herceptin or anti-HER-2 (clone CB-11) interactions with HER-2.. receptor and not due to

We introduce CamRay, a platform that captures video of users as they move in front of wall-sized displays using camera ar- rays, and presents this video on remote walls. Using

3, that the local time variations of the plasma drift velocities, using the three different approaches, are fairly similar, but the veloci- ties inferred differ significantly (the

Pour l’argile de Niemenike, nous obtenons des résistances supérieures avec la cure longue alors que pour le déchet argileux d’Allou Kagne, les résistances sont bien supérieures