• Aucun résultat trouvé

Randomized fluid dynamics based on subgrid transport

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Randomized fluid dynamics based on subgrid transport"

Copied!
27
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HAL Id: hal-01377747

https://hal.inria.fr/hal-01377747

Submitted on 9 Nov 2016

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

Randomized fluid dynamics based on subgrid transport

Valentin Resseguier, Etienne Mémin, Bertrand Chapron

To cite this version:

Valentin Resseguier, Etienne Mémin, Bertrand Chapron. Randomized fluid dynamics based on subgrid transport. Workshop on Stochastic Weather Generators, May 2016, Vannes, France. �hal-01377747�

(2)

Randomized fluid

dynamics based on subgrid transport

Valentin Resseguier, Etienne Mémin, Bertrand Chapron

(3)

Motivations

Rigorously identified sudgrid dynamics effects

Injecting likely small-scale dynamics

Predicting possible distinct scenarios

Quantification of modeling errors:

Diagnose to design numerical simulations (mesh refinements, …) Data assimilation: ensemble forecasts

2

(4)

Randomized dynamics

SQG under Moderate Uncertainty

Contents

(5)

Randomized dynamics

4

(6)

Random equations

Random initial conditions

Arbitrary Gaussian forcing

Averaging, homogenization

Adding white random velocity

Underdispersive

Adding energy + wrong phase

Previous talk

v = w + B ˙

(7)

Advection of tracer

D ⇥

Dt = 0

Θ

(8)

Advection

Diffusion

Advection of tracer Θ

Drift

correction

Multiplicative random

forcing

Balanced energy exchanges

@

t

⇥ + w

?

· r ⇥ + B ˙ · r ⇥ = r ·

✓ 1

2 a r ⇥

(9)

Drift correction

8

(10)

Drift correction

w? = w 1

2 (r · a)T

(11)

Uncertainty

Derived random models

Conservations (mass, linear momentum, …)

D Dt

Navier-Stokes

Boussinesq

QG MU

SQG MU

SQG SU

10

(12)

SQG under Moderate Uncertainty

SQG MU

Code available online

(13)

Reference flow:

deterministic SQG

512 x 512

12

(14)

One realization

x ( m)

y(m)

t= 17 d ay s

0 2 4 6 8 10

x 105 0

2 4 6 8

x 105

10−5 10−4

10−6 10−4 10−2

|ˆb(κ)|2

κ! r a d . m−1"

t= 17 d ay s

(15)

One realization

Our model Larger noise

Lower noise

x ( m)

y(m)

t= 17 d ay s

0 2 4 6 8 10

x 105 0

2 4 6 8

x 105

10−5 10−4

10−6 10−4 10−2

|ˆb(κ)|2

κ! r a d . m−1"

t= 17 d ay s

14

(16)

x ( m)

y(m)

t= 17 d ay s

0 2 4 6 8 10

x 105 0

2 4 6 8

x 105

10−5 10−4

10−6 10−4 10−2

|ˆb(κ)|2

κ! r a d . m−1"

t= 17 d ay s x ( m)

y(m)

t= 17 d ay s

0 2 4 6 8 10

x 105 0

2 4 6 8

x 105

10−5 10−4

10−6 10−4 10−2

|ˆb(κ)|2

κ! r a d . m−1"

t= 17 d ay s x ( m)

y(m)

t= 17 d ay s

0 2 4 6 8 10

x 105 0

2 4 6 8

x 105

10−5 10−4

10−6 10−4 10−2

|ˆb(κ)|2

κ! r a d . m−1"

t= 17 d ay s x ( m)

y(m)

t= 17 d ay s

0 2 4 6 8 10

x 105 0

2 4 6 8

x 105

10−5 10−4

10−6 10−4 10−2

|ˆb(κ)|2

κ! r a d . m−1"

t= 17 d ay s x ( m)

y(m)

t= 17 d ay s

0 2 4 6 8 10

x 105 0

2 4 6 8

x 105

10−5 10−4

10−6 10−4 10−2

|ˆb(κ)|2

κ! r a d . m−1"

t= 17 d ay s x ( m)

y(m)

t= 17 d ay s

0 2 4 6 8 10

x 105 0

2 4 6 8

x 105

10−5 10−4

10−6 10−4 10−2

|ˆb(κ)|2

κ! r a d . m−1"

t= 17 d ay s

Ensemble

(17)

x ( m)

y(m)

t= 17 d ay s

0 2 4 6 8 10

x 105 0

2 4 6 8

x 105

10−5 10−4

10−6 10−4 10−2

|ˆb(κ)|2

κ! r a d . m−1"

t= 17 d ay s x ( m)

y(m)

t= 17 d ay s

0 2 4 6 8 10

x 105 0

2 4 6 8

x 105

10−5 10−4

10−6 10−4 10−2

|ˆb(κ)|2

κ! r a d . m−1"

t= 17 d ay s x ( m)

y(m)

t= 17 d ay s

0 2 4 6 8 10

x 105 0

2 4 6 8

x 105

10−5 10−4

10−6 10−4 10−2

|ˆb(κ)|2

κ! r a d . m−1"

t= 17 d ay s x ( m)

y(m)

t= 17 d ay s

0 2 4 6 8 10

x 105 0

2 4 6 8

x 105

10−5 10−4

10−6 10−4 10−2

|ˆb(κ)|2

κ! r a d . m−1"

t= 17 d ay s x ( m)

y(m)

t= 17 d ay s

0 2 4 6 8 10

x 105 0

2 4 6 8

x 105

10−5 10−4

10−6 10−4 10−2

|ˆb(κ)|2

κ! r a d . m−1"

t= 17 d ay s x ( m)

y(m)

t= 17 d ay s

0 2 4 6 8 10

x 105 0

2 4 6 8

x 105

10−5 10−4

10−6 10−4 10−2

|ˆb(κ)|2

κ! r a d . m−1"

t= 17 d ay s

Ensemble

16

(18)

Conclusion

(19)

Conclusion

Random transport applicable to any dynamics

Better small scales

Estimate position and amplitude of errors

Extreme events

Likely scenarios

under Strong Uncertainty:


Simple 2D description of frontolysis/frontogenesis

18

(20)

Code SQG MU:

link from Fluminance website - V. Resseguier

Thank you for your attention

(21)

Likely SQG scenarios

tracked by SQG MU

20

(22)

pdf of the 1st PCA coecient along time

20 30 40 50 60 70 80

Time (day) -4

-2 0 2 4

1st PCAcoecient

×10-4

0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000

x ( m)

y(m)

t= 17 d ay s

0 2 4 6 8 10

x 105 0

2 4 6 8

x 105

10−5 10−4

10−6 10−4 10−2

|ˆb(κ)|2

κ! r a d . m−1"

t= 17 d ay s x ( m)

y(m)

t= 17 d ay s

0 2 4 6 8 10

x 105 0

2 4 6 8

x 105

10−5 10−4

10−6 10−4 10−2

|ˆb(κ)|2

κ! r a d . m−1"

t= 17 d ay s x ( m)

y(m)

t= 17 d ay s

0 2 4 6 8 10

x 105 0

2 4 6 8

x 105

10−5 10−4

10−6 10−4 10−2

|ˆb(κ)|2

κ! r a d . m−1"

t= 17 d ay s x ( m)

y(m)

t= 17 d ay s

0 2 4 6 8 10

x 105 0

2 4 6 8

x 105

10−5 10−4

10−6 10−4 10−2

|ˆb(κ)|2

κ! r a d . m−1"

t= 17 d ay s x ( m)

y(m)

t= 17 d ay s

0 2 4 6 8 10

x 105 0

2 4 6 8

x 105

10−5 10−4

10−6 10−4 10−2

|ˆb(κ)|2

κ! r a d . m−1"

t= 17 d ay s x ( m)

y(m)

t= 17 d ay s

0 2 4 6 8 10

x 105 0

2 4 6 8

x 105

10−5 10−4

10−6 10−4 10−2

|ˆb(κ)|2

κ! r a d . m−1"

t= 17 d ay s

Ensemble

y(m)

x(m) t = 0 d ay s

0 2 4 6 8

x 105 0

2 4 6 8

x 105

−1

−0.5 0 0.5 x 101 −3

y(m)

x(m)

t = 70 d ay s

0 5 10

x 105 0

2 4 6 8

x 105

−1

−0.5 0 0.5 x 101 −3

512x512

Chaotic

transition y(m

)

x(m)

t = 70 d ay s

0 2 4 6 8

x 105 0

2 4 6 8

x 105

−1

−0.5 0 0.5 x 101 −3

128x128

512x512

t=70 days

t=0

(23)

SQG under Strong Uncertainty

SQG SU

22

(24)

Mesoscale divergence

Horizontal Diffusion Geostrophic balance

f ⇥ u = 1

b

r p

0

+ a

2 u

r · u / r ? · u

(25)

Filtering of model outputs:

Gula, Jonathan, M. Jeroen Molemaker, and James C. McWilliams

"Gulf Stream dynamics along the southeastern US seaboard.”

Journal of Physical Oceanography 45.3 (2015): 690-715.

24

(26)

Spatial test

(27)

10−4 10−2

10−1 100 101

|ˆf1(κ)|/|ˆf2(κ)|

κ!

r a d . m1"

Me an sp e c t r u m r at i o 10−4

10−4 10−2 100 102

|ˆf(κ)|2

κ!

r a d . m1"

Nor mal i z e d me an sp e c t r u m of t h e i r r ot at i on al v e l o c i ty an d of i t s e st i mat i on

10−4 0

0.5 1 1.5

θ

κ!

r a d . s1"

Me an p h ase sh i f t

Spectral test

26

Références

Documents relatifs

To test whether the vesicular pool of Atat1 promotes the acetyl- ation of -tubulin in MTs, we isolated subcellular fractions from newborn mouse cortices and then assessed

Néanmoins, la dualité des acides (Lewis et Bronsted) est un système dispendieux, dont le recyclage est une opération complexe et par conséquent difficilement applicable à

Cette mutation familiale du gène MME est une substitution d’une base guanine par une base adenine sur le chromosome 3q25.2, ce qui induit un remplacement d’un acide aminé cystéine

En ouvrant cette page avec Netscape composer, vous verrez que le cadre prévu pour accueillir le panoramique a une taille déterminée, choisie par les concepteurs des hyperpaysages

Chaque séance durera deux heures, mais dans la seconde, seule la première heure sera consacrée à l'expérimentation décrite ici ; durant la seconde, les élèves travailleront sur

A time-varying respiratory elastance model is developed with a negative elastic component (E demand ), to describe the driving pressure generated during a patient initiated

The aim of this study was to assess, in three experimental fields representative of the various topoclimatological zones of Luxembourg, the impact of timing of fungicide

Attention to a relation ontology [...] refocuses security discourses to better reflect and appreciate three forms of interconnection that are not sufficiently attended to